Top

Computational Mechanics

Published in:

01-10-2014 | Original Paper

FSI analysis of the blood flow and geometrical characteristics in the thoracic aorta

Authors: Hiroshi Suito, Kenji Takizawa, Viet Q. H. Huynh, Daniel Sze, Takuya Ueda

Published in: Computational Mechanics | Issue 4/2014

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

We present a fluid–structure interaction (FSI) analysis of the blood flow and geometrical characteristics in the thoracic aorta. The FSI is handled with the sequentially-coupled arterial FSI technique. The fluid mechanics equations are solved with the ST-VMS method, which is the variational multiscale version of the deforming-spatial-domain/stabilized space–time (DSD/SST) method. We focus on the relationship between the centerline geometry of the aorta and the flow field, which influences the wall shear stress distribution. The centerlines of the aorta models we use in our analysis are extracted from the CT scans, and we assume a constant diameter. Torsion-free model geometries are generated by projecting the original centerline to its averaged plane of curvature. The flow fields for the original and projected geometries are compared to examine the influence of the torsion.

previous article The role of numerical simulation for the development of an advanced HIFU system

next article Coronary arterial dynamics computation with medical-image-based time-dependent anatomical models and element-based zero-stress state estimates

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Isselbacher E (2005) Thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms. Circulation 111:816–828CrossRef

Elefteriades J (2002) Natural history of thoracic aortic aneurysms: indications for surgery, and surgical versus nonsurgical risks. Ann Thorac Surg 74:S1877–1880CrossRef

Davies R, Goldstein L, Coady STMA, Rizzo J, Kopf G, Elefteriades J (2002) Yearly rupture or dissection rates for thoracic aortic aneurysms: simple prediction based on size. Ann Thorac Surg 73:17–28CrossRef

Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Schwaab M, Conklin BS (2008) Arterial fluid mechanics modeling with the stabilized space–time fluid–structure interaction technique. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 57:601–629. doi:10.1002/fld.1633 MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

Tezduyar TE, Schwaab M, Sathe S (2009) Sequentially-coupled arterial fluid–structure interaction (SCAFSI) technique. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198:3524–3533. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2008.05.024 MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

Tezduyar TE, Takizawa K, Moorman C, Wright S, Christopher J (2010) Multiscale sequentially-coupled arterial FSI technique. Comput Mech 46:17–29. doi:10.1007/s00466-009-0423-2 MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2011) Multiscale space–time fluid–structure interaction techniques. Comput Mech 48:247–267. doi:10.1007/s00466-011-0571-z MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2012) Space–time fluid–structure interaction methods. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 22:1230001. doi:10.1142/S0218202512300013 MathSciNetCrossRef

Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2013) Computational fluid–structure interaction: methods and applications. Wiley, New YorkCrossRef

10.

Tezduyar TE (1992) Stabilized finite element formulations for incompressible flow computations. Adv Appl Mech 28:1–44. doi:10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70153-4 MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

11.

Tezduyar TE, Behr M, Liou J (1992) A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces—the deforming-spatial-domain/space–time procedure: I. The concept and the preliminary numerical tests. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 94:339–351. doi:10.1016/0045-7825(92)90059-S MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

12.

Tezduyar TE, Behr M, Mittal S, Liou J (1992) A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces—the deforming-spatial-domain/space–time procedure: II. Computation of free-surface flows, two-liquid flows, and flows with drifting cylinders. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 94:353–371. doi:10.1016/0045-7825(92)90060-W MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

13.

Tezduyar TE (2003) Computation of moving boundaries and interfaces and stabilization parameters. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 43:555–575. doi:10.1002/fld.505 MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

14.

Tezduyar TE, Sathe S (2007) Modeling of fluid–structure interactions with the space–time finite elements: solution techniques. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 54:855–900. doi:10.1002/fld.1430 MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

15.

Hughes TJR (1995) Multiscale phenomena: Green’s functions, the Dirichlet-to-Neumann formulation, subgrid scale models, bubbles, and the origins of stabilized methods. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 127:387–401

16.

Hughes TJR, Oberai AA, Mazzei L (2001) Large Eddy simulation of turbulent channel flows by the variational multiscale method. Phys Fluids 13:1784–1799CrossRef

17.

Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Cottrell JA, Hughes TJR, Reali A, Scovazzi G (2007) Variational multiscale residual-based turbulence modeling for large eddy simulation of incompressible flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197:173–201MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

18.

Bazilevs Y, Akkerman I (2010) Large Eddy simulation of turbulent Taylor–Couette flow using isogeometric analysis and the residual-based variational multiscale method. J Comput Phys 229:3402–3414MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

19.

Brooks AN, Hughes TJR (1982) Streamline upwind/Petrov–Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 32:199–259

20.

Tezduyar TE, Mittal S, Ray SE, Shih R (1992) Incompressible flow computations with stabilized bilinear and linear equal-order-interpolation velocity–pressure elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 95:221–242. doi:10.1016/0045-7825(92)90141-6 MATHCrossRef

21.

Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Pausewang J, Schwaab M, Christopher J, Crabtree J (2008) Interface projection techniques for fluid–structure interaction modeling with moving-mesh methods. Comput Mech 43:39–49. doi:10.1007/s00466-008-0261-7 MATHCrossRef

22.

Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Schwaab M, Pausewang J, Christopher J, Crabtree J (2008) Fluid–structure interaction modeling of ringsail parachutes. Comput Mech 43:133–142. doi:10.1007/s00466-008-0260-8 MATHCrossRef

23.

Tezduyar TE, Takizawa K, Moorman C, Wright S, Christopher J (2010) Space–time finite element computation of complex fluid–structure interactions. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 64:1201–1218. doi:10.1002/fld.2221 MATHCrossRef

24.

Takizawa K, Moorman C, Wright S, Spielman T, Tezduyar TE (2011) Fluid–structure interaction modeling and performance analysis of the Orion spacecraft parachutes. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65:271–285. doi:10.1002/fld.2348 MATHCrossRef

25.

Takizawa K, Wright S, Moorman C, Tezduyar TE (2011) Fluid–structure interaction modeling of parachute clusters. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65:286–307. doi:10.1002/fld.2359 MATHCrossRef

26.

Takizawa K, Henicke B, Tezduyar TE, Hsu M-C, Bazilevs Y (2011) Stabilized space–time computation of wind-turbine rotor aerodynamics. Comput Mech 48:333–344. doi:10.1007/s00466-011-0589-2 MATHCrossRef

27.

Takizawa K, Spielman T, Tezduyar TE (2011) Space–time FSI modeling and dynamical analysis of spacecraft parachutes and parachute clusters. Comput Mech 48:345–364. doi:10.1007/s00466-011-0590-9 MATHCrossRef

28.

Takizawa K, Henicke B, Montes D, Tezduyar TE, Hsu M-C, Bazilevs Y (2011) Numerical-performance studies for the stabilized space–time computation of wind-turbine rotor aerodynamics. Comput Mech 48:647–657. doi:10.1007/s00466-011-0614-5 MATHCrossRef

29.

Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2012) Computational methods for parachute fluid–structure interactions. Arch Comput Methods Eng 19:125–169. doi:10.1007/s11831-012-9070-4 MathSciNetCrossRef

30.

Takizawa K, Bazilevs Y, Tezduyar TE (2012) Space–time and ALE–VMS techniques for patient-specific cardiovascular fluid–structure interaction modeling. Arch Comput Methods Eng 19:171–225. doi:10.1007/s11831-012-9071-3 MathSciNetCrossRef

31.

Takizawa K, Henicke B, Puntel A, Kostov N, Tezduyar TE (2012) Space–time techniques for computational aerodynamics modeling of flapping wings of an actual locust. Comput Mech 50:743–760. doi:10.1007/s00466-012-0759-x MATHCrossRef

32.

Takizawa K, Kostov N, Puntel A, Henicke B, Tezduyar TE (2012) Space–time computational analysis of bio-inspired flapping-wing aerodynamics of a micro aerial vehicle. Comput Mech 50:761–778. doi:10.1007/s00466-012-0758-y MATHCrossRef

33.

Takizawa K, Schjodt K, Puntel A, Kostov N, Tezduyar TE (2012) Patient-specific computer modeling of blood flow in cerebral arteries with aneurysm and stent. Comput Mech 50:675–686. doi:10.1007/s00466-012-0760-4 MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

34.

Takizawa K, Fritze M, Montes D, Spielman T, Tezduyar TE (2012) Fluid–structure interaction modeling of ringsail parachutes with disreefing and modified geometric porosity. Comput Mech 50:835–854. doi:10.1007/s00466-012-0761-3 MATHCrossRef

35.

Takizawa K, Montes D, Fritze M, McIntyre S, Boben J, Tezduyar TE (2013) Methods for FSI modeling of spacecraft parachute dynamics and cover separation. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 23:307–338. doi:10.1142/S0218202513400058 MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

36.

Takizawa K, Montes D, McIntyre S, Tezduyar TE (2013) Space–time VMS methods for modeling of incompressible flows at high Reynolds numbers. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 23:223–248. doi:10.1142/s0218202513400022 MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

37.

Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, McIntyre S, Kostov N, Kolesar R, Habluetzel C (2014) Space–time VMS computation of wind-turbine rotor and tower aerodynamics. Comput Mech 53:1–15. doi:10.1007/s00466-013-0888-x MATHCrossRef

38.

Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Boben J, Kostov N, Boswell C, Buscher A (2013) Fluid–structure interaction modeling of clusters of spacecraft parachutes with modified geometric porosity. Comput Mech 52:1351–1464. doi:10.1007/s00466-013-0880-5 MATHCrossRef

39.

Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2014) Space–time computation techniques with continuous representation in time (ST-C). Comput Mech 53:91–99. doi:10.1007/s00466-013-0895-y MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

40.

Takizawa K, Takagi H, Tezduyar TE, Torii R (2013) Estimation of element-based zero-stress state for arterial FSI computations. Comput Mech. doi:10.1007/s00466-013-0919-7

41.

Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Buscher A, Asada S (2013) Space–time interface-tracking with topology change (ST–TC). Comput Mech. doi:10.1007/s00466-013-0935-7

42.

Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Kostov N (2014) Sequentially-coupled space–time FSI analysis of bio-inspired flapping-wing aerodynamics of an MAV. Comput Mech. doi:10.1007/s00466-014-0980-x

43.

Hughes TJR, Liu WK, Zimmermann TK (1981) Lagrangian–Eulerian finite element formulation for incompressible viscous flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 29:329–349MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

44.

Ohayon R (2001) Reduced symmetric models for modal analysis of internal structural-acoustic and hydroelastic-sloshing systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:3009–3019MATHCrossRef

45.

van Brummelen EH, de Borst R (2005) On the nonnormality of subiteration for a fluid–structure interaction problem. SIAM J Sci Comput 27:599–621MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

46.

Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Zhang Y, Hughes TJR (2006) Isogeometric fluid–structure interaction analysis with applications to arterial blood flow. Comput Mech 38:310–322MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

47.

Khurram RA, Masud A (2006) A multiscale/stabilized formulation of the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations for moving boundary flows and fluid–structure interaction. Comput Mech 38:403–416MATHCrossRef

48.

Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Hughes TJR, Zhang Y (2008) Isogeometric fluid–structure interaction: theory, algorithms, and computations. Comput Mech 43:3–37MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

49.

Dettmer WG, Peric D (2008) On the coupling between fluid flow and mesh motion in the modelling of fluid–structure interaction. Comput Mech 43:81–90MATHCrossRef

50.

Bazilevs Y, Gohean JR, Hughes TJR, Moser RD, Zhang Y (2009) Patient-specific isogeometric fluid–structure interaction analysis of thoracic aortic blood flow due to implantation of the Jarvik (2000) left ventricular assist device. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198(2009):3534–3550MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

51.

Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Benson D, Sankaran S, Marsden A (2009) Computational fluid–structure interaction: methods and application to a total cavopulmonary connection. Comput Mech 45:77–89MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

52.

Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Zhang Y, Wang W, Liang X, Kvamsdal T, Brekken R, Isaksen J (2010) A fully-coupled fluid–structure interaction simulation of cerebral aneurysms. Comput Mech 46:3–16MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

53.

Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Zhang Y, Wang W, Kvamsdal T, Hentschel S, Isaksen J (2010) Computational fluid–structure interaction: methods and application to cerebral aneurysms. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 9:481–498CrossRef

54.

Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Akkerman I, Wright S, Takizawa K, Henicke B, Spielman T, Tezduyar TE (2011) 3D simulation of wind turbine rotors at full scale. Part I: geometry modeling and aerodynamics. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65:207–235. doi:10.1002/fld.2400 MATHCrossRef

55.

Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Kiendl J, Wüchner R, Bletzinger K-U (2011) 3D simulation of wind turbine rotors at full scale. Part II: fluid–structure interaction modeling with composite blades. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65:236–253MATHCrossRef

56.

Akkerman I, Bazilevs Y, Kees CE, Farthing MW (2011) Isogeometric analysis of free-surface flow. J Comput Phys 230:4137–4152MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

57.

Hsu M-C, Bazilevs Y (2011) Blood vessel tissue prestress modeling for vascular fluid–structure interaction simulations. Finite Elem Anal Des 47:593–599MathSciNetCrossRef

58.

Nagaoka S, Nakabayashi Y, Yagawa G, Kim YJ (2011) Accurate fluid–structure interaction computations using elements without mid-side nodes. Comput Mech 48:269–276. doi:10.1007/s00466-011-0620-7 MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

59.

Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2012) ALE–VMS and ST–VMS methods for computer modeling of wind-turbine rotor aerodynamics and fluid–structure interaction. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 22:1230002. doi:10.1142/S0218202512300025 CrossRef

60.

Akkerman I, Bazilevs Y, Benson DJ, Farthing MW, Kees CE (2012) Free-surface flow and fluid–object interaction modeling with emphasis on ship hydrodynamics. J Appl Mech 79:010905CrossRef

61.

Hsu M-C, Akkerman I, Bazilevs Y (2012) Wind turbine aerodynamics using ALE–VMS: validation and role of weakly enforced boundary conditions. Comput Mech 50:499–511MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

62.

Hsu M-C, Bazilevs Y (2012) Fluid–structure interaction modeling of wind turbines: simulating the full machine. Comput Mech 50:821–833MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

63.

Akkerman I, Dunaway J, Kvandal J, Spinks J, Bazilevs Y (2012) Toward free-surface modeling of planing vessels: simulation of the Fridsma hull using ALE–VMS. Comput Mech 50:719–727MATHCrossRef

64.

Minami S, Kawai H, Yoshimura S (2012) Parallel BDD-based monolithic approach for acoustic fluid–structure interaction. Comput Mech 50:707–718MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

65.

Miras T, Schotte J-S, Ohayon R (2012) Energy approach for static and linearized dynamic studies of elastic structures containing incompressible liquids with capillarity: a theoretical formulation. Comput Mech 50:729–741MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

66.

van Opstal TM, van Brummelen EH, de Borst R, Lewis MR (2012) A finite-element/boundary-element method for large-displacement fluid–structure interaction. Comput Mech 50:779–788MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

67.

Yao JY, Liu GR, Narmoneva DA, Hinton RB, Zhang Z-Q (2012) Immersed smoothed finite element method for fluid–structure interaction simulation of aortic valves. Comput Mech 50:789–804MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

68.

Larese A, Rossi R, Onate E, Idelsohn SR (2012) A coupled PFEM–Eulerian approach for the solution of porous FSI problems. Comput Mech 50:805–819MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

69.

Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2013) Challenges and directions in computational fluid–structure interaction. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 23:215–221. doi:10.1142/S0218202513400010 MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

70.

Korobenko A, Hsu M-C, Akkerman I, Tippmann J, Bazilevs Y (2013) Structural mechanics modeling and FSI simulation of wind turbines. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 23:249–272MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

71.

Yao JY, Liu GR, Qian D, Chen CL, Xu GX (2013) A moving-mesh gradient smoothing method for compressible CFD problems. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 23:273–305MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

72.

Kamran K, Rossi R, Onate E, Idelsohn SR (2013) A compressible Lagrangian framework for modeling the fluid–structure interaction in the underwater implosion of an aluminum cylinder. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 23:339–367MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

73.

Hsu M-C, Akkerman I, Bazilevs Y (2013) Finite element simulation of wind turbine aerodynamics: validation study using NREL Phase VI experiment. Wind Energy. doi:10.1002/we.1599

74.

Hughes TJR, Cottrell JA, Bazilevs Y (2005) Isogeometric analysis: CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry, and mesh refinement. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194:4135–4195MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

75.

Cottrell JA, Hughes TJR, Bazilevs Y (2009) Isogeometric analysis. Toward integration of CAD and FEA. Wiley, New YorkCrossRef

76.

Tezduyar T, Aliabadi S, Behr M, Johnson A, Mittal S (1993) Parallel finite-element computation of 3D flows. Computer 26:27–36. doi:10.1109/2.237441 CrossRef

77.

Johnson AA, Tezduyar TE (1994) Mesh update strategies in parallel finite element computations of flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 119:73–94. doi:10.1016/0045-7825(94)00077-8 MATHCrossRef

78.

Tezduyar TE (2001) Finite element methods for flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces. Arch Comput Methods Eng 8:83–130. doi:10.1007/BF02897870 MATHCrossRef

79.

Stein K, Tezduyar T, Benney R (2003) Mesh moving techniques for fluid–structure interactions with large displacements. J Appl Mech 70:58–63. doi:10.1115/1.1530635 MATHCrossRef

80.

Stein K, Tezduyar TE, Benney R (2004) Automatic mesh update with the solid-extension mesh moving technique. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193:2019–2032. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2003.12.046 MATHCrossRef

81.

Mittal S, Tezduyar TE (1992) Notes on the stabilized space–time finite element formulation of unsteady incompressible flows. Comput Phys Commun 73:93–112. doi:10.1016/0010-4655(92)90031-S CrossRef

82.

Tezduyar TE, Aliabadi SK, Behr M, Mittal S (1994) Massively parallel finite element simulation of compressible and incompressible flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 119:157–177. doi:10.1016/0045-7825(94)00082-4 MATHCrossRef

83.

Tezduyar T, Aliabadi S, Behr M, Johnson A, Kalro V, Litke M (1996) Flow simulation and high performance computing. Comput Mech 18:397–412. doi:10.1007/BF00350249 MATHCrossRef

84.

Wren GP, Ray SE, Aliabadi SK, Tezduyar TE (1997) Simulation of flow problems with moving mechanical components, fluid–structure interactions and two-fluid interfaces. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 24:1433–1448MATHCrossRef

85.

Tezduyar TE (1999) CFD methods for three-dimensional computation of complex flow problems. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 81:97–116. doi:10.1016/S0167-6105(99)00011-2 CrossRef

86.

Guler I, Behr M, Tezduyar T (1999) Parallel finite element computation of free-surface flows. Comput Mech 23:117–123. doi:10.1007/s004660050391 CrossRef

87.

Tezduyar TE (2006) Interface-tracking and interface-capturing techniques for finite element computation of moving boundaries and interfaces. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195:2983–3000. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2004.09.018 MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

88.

Mittal S, Tezduyar TE (1992) A finite element study of incompressible flows past oscillating cylinders and aerofoils. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 15:1073–1118. doi:10.1002/fld.1650150911 CrossRef

89.

Mittal S, Tezduyar TE (1994) Massively parallel finite element computation of incompressible flows involving fluid–body interactions. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 112:253–282. doi:10.1016/0045-7825(94)90029-9 MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

90.

Kalro V, Aliabadi S, Garrard W, Tezduyar T, Mittal S, Stein K (1997) Parallel finite element simulation of large ram-air parachutes. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 24:1353–1369MATHCrossRef

91.

Tezduyar T, Kalro V, Garrard W (1997) Parallel computational methods for 3D simulation of a parafoil with prescribed shape changes. Parallel Comput 23:1349–1363. doi:10.1016/S0167-8191(97)00057-4 MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

92.

Tezduyar T, Osawa Y (1999) Methods for parallel computation of complex flow problems. Parallel Comput 25:2039–2066. doi:10.1016/S0167-8191(99)00080-0 MathSciNetCrossRef

93.

Tezduyar T, Osawa Y (2001) The multi-domain method for computation of the aerodynamics of a parachute crossing the far wake of an aircraft. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191:705–716. doi:10.1016/S0045-7825(01)00310-3 MATHCrossRef

94.

Ray SE, Tezduyar TE (2000) Fluid–object interactions in interior ballistics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:363–372. doi:10.1016/S0045-7825(00)00207-3 MATHCrossRef

95.

Akin JE, Tezduyar TE, Ungor M (2007) Computation of flow problems with the mixed interface-tracking/interface-capturing technique (MITICT). Comput Fluids 36:2–11. doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2005.07.008 MATHCrossRef

96.

Mittal S, Tezduyar TE (1995) Parallel finite element simulation of 3D incompressible flows—fluid–structure interactions. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 21:933–953. doi:10.1002/fld.1650211011 MATHCrossRef

97.

Wren GP, Ray SE, Aliabadi SK, Tezduyar TE (1995) Space–time finite element computation of compressible flows between moving components. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 21:981–991. doi:10.1002/fld.1650211015 MATHCrossRef

98.

Ray SE, Wren GP, Tezduyar TE (1997) Parallel implementations of a finite element formulation for fluid–structure interactions in interior flows. Parallel Comput 23:1279–1292. doi:10.1016/S0167-8191(97)00053-7 MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

99.

Takase S, Kashiyama K, Tanaka S, Tezduyar TE (2010) Space–time SUPG formulation of the shallow-water equations. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 64:1379–1394. doi:10.1002/fld.2464 MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

100.

Takase S, Kashiyama K, Tanaka S, Tezduyar TE (2011) Space–time SUPG finite element computation of shallow-water flows with moving shorelines. Comput Mech 48(2011):293–306. doi:10.1007/s00466-011-0618-1 MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

101.

Johnson AA, Tezduyar TE (1996) Simulation of multiple spheres falling in a liquid-filled tube. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 134:351–373. doi:10.1016/0045-7825(95)00988-4 MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

102.

Johnson AA, Tezduyar TE (1997) Parallel computation of incompressible flows with complex geometries. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 24:1321–1340MATHCrossRef

103.

Johnson AA, Tezduyar TE (1997) 3D simulation of fluid–particle interactions with the number of particles reaching 100. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 145:301–321. doi:10.1016/S0045-7825(96)01223-6 MATHCrossRef

104.

Johnson AA, Tezduyar TE (1999) Advanced mesh generation and update methods for 3D flow simulations. Comput Mech 23:130–143. doi:10.1007/s004660050393 MATHCrossRef

105.

Johnson A, Tezduyar T (2001) Methods for 3D computation of fluid–object interactions in spatially-periodic flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:3201–3221. doi:10.1016/S0045-7825(00)00389-3 MATHCrossRef

106.

Kalro V, Tezduyar TE (2000) A parallel 3D computational method for fluid–structure interactions in parachute systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:321–332MATHCrossRef

107.

Stein K, Benney R, Kalro V, Tezduyar TE, Leonard J, Accorsi M (2000) Parachute fluid–structure interactions: 3-D computation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:373–386. doi:10.1016/S0045-7825(00)00208-5 MATHCrossRef

108.

Tezduyar T, Osawa Y (2001) Fluid–structure interactions of a parachute crossing the far wake of an aircraft. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191:717–726. doi:10.1016/S0045-7825(01)00311-5 MATHCrossRef

109.

Stein K, Benney R, Tezduyar T, Potvin J (2001) Fluid–structure interactions of a cross parachute: numerical simulation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191:673–687. doi:10.1016/S0045-7825(01)00312-7 MATHCrossRef

110.

Stein KR, Benney RJ, Tezduyar TE, Leonard JW, Accorsi ML (2001) Fluid–structure interactions of a round parachute: modeling and simulation techniques. J Aircraft 38:800–808. doi:10.2514/2.2864 CrossRef

111.

Stein K, Tezduyar T, Kumar V, Sathe S, Benney R, Thornburg E, Kyle C, Nonoshita T (2003) Aerodynamic interactions between parachute canopies. J Appl Mech 70:50–57. doi:10.1115/1.1530634 MATHCrossRef

112.

Stein K, Tezduyar T, Benney R (2003) Computational methods for modeling parachute systems. Comput Sci Eng 5:39–46. doi:10.1109/MCISE.2003.1166551 CrossRef

113.

Tezduyar TE, Sathe S (2004) Enhanced-discretization space–time technique (EDSTT). Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 193:1385–1401. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2003.12.029 MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

114.

Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Keedy R, Stein K (2006) Space–time finite element techniques for computation of fluid—structure interactions. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195:2002–2027. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2004.09.014 MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

115.

Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Stein K (2006) Solution techniques for the fully-discretized equations in computation of fluid–structure interactions with the space–time formulations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195:5743–5753. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2005.08.023 MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

116.

Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE (2006) Computer modeling of cardiovascular fluid–structure interactions with the deforming-spatial-domain/stabilized space–time formulation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195:1885–1895. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2005.05.050 MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

117.

Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE (2006) Fluid–structure interaction modeling of aneurysmal conditions with high and normal blood pressures. Comput Mech 38:482–490. doi:10.1007/s00466-006-0065-6 MATHCrossRef

118.

Tezduyar TE (2007) Finite elements in fluids: stabilized formulations and moving boundaries and interfaces. Comput Fluids 36:191–206. doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2005.02.011 MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

119.

Tezduyar TE (2007) Finite elements in fluids: special methods and enhanced solution techniques. Comput Fluids 36:207–223. doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2005.02.010 MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

120.

Tezduyar TE, Sameh A (2006) Parallel finite element computations in fluid mechanics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195:1872–1884. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2005.05.038 MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

121.

Stein K, Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Benney R, Charles R (2005) Fluid–structure interaction modeling of parachute soft-landing dynamics. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 47:619–631. doi:10.1002/fld.835 MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

122.

Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Cragin T, Nanna B, Conklin BS, Pausewang J, Schwaab M (2007) Modeling of fluid–structure interactions with the space–time finite elements: arterial fluid mechanics. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 54:901–922. doi:10.1002/fld.1443 MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

123.

Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE (2007) Influence of wall elasticity in patient-specific hemodynamic simulations. Comput Fluids 36:160–168. doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2005.07.014 MATHCrossRef

124.

Sathe S, Benney R, Charles R, Doucette E, Miletti J, Senga M, Stein K, Tezduyar TE (2007) Fluid–structure interaction modeling of complex parachute designs with the space–time finite element techniques. Comput Fluids 36:127–135. doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2005.07.010 MATHCrossRef

125.

Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE (2007) Numerical investigation of the effect of hypertensive blood pressure on cerebral aneurysm—dependence of the effect on the aneurysm shape. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 54:995–1009. doi:10.1002/fld.1497 MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

126.

Sathe S, Tezduyar TE (2008) Modeling of fluid–structure interactions with the space–time finite elements: contact problems. Comput Mech 43:51–60. doi:10.1007/s00466-008-0299-6 MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

127.

Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE (2008) Fluid–structure interaction modeling of a patient-specific cerebral aneurysm: influence of structural modeling. Comput Mech 43:151–159. doi:10.1007/s00466-008-0325-8 MATHCrossRef

128.

Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE (2009) Fluid–structure interaction modeling of blood flow and cerebral aneurysm: significance of artery and aneurysm shapes. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198:3613–3621. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2008.08.020 MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

129.

Takizawa K, Christopher J, Tezduyar TE, Sathe S (2010) Space–time finite element computation of arterial fluid–structure interactions with patient-specific data. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 26:101–116. doi:10.1002/cnm.1241 MATHCrossRef

130.

Takizawa K, Moorman C, Wright S, Christopher J, Tezduyar TE (2010) Wall shear stress calculations in space–time finite element computation of arterial fluid–structure interactions. Comput Mech 46:31–41. doi:10.1007/s00466-009-0425-0 MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

131.

Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE (2010) Influence of wall thickness on fluid–structure interaction computations of cerebral aneurysms. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 26:336–347. doi:10.1002/cnm.1289 MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

132.

Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE (2010) Role of 0D peripheral vasculature model in fluid–structure interaction modeling of aneurysms. Comput Mech 46:43–52. doi:10.1007/s00466-009-0439-7 MATHCrossRef

133.

Takizawa K, Moorman C, Wright S, Purdue J, McPhail T, Chen PR, Warren J, Tezduyar TE (2011) Patient-specific arterial fluid–structure interaction modeling of cerebral aneurysms. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65:308–323. doi:10.1002/fld.2360 MATHCrossRef

134.

Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE (2011) Influencing factors in image-based fluid–structure interaction computation of cerebral aneurysms. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65:324–340. doi:10.1002/fld.2448 MATHCrossRef

135.

Tezduyar TE, Takizawa K, Brummer T, Chen PR (2011) Space–time fluid–structure interaction modeling of patient-specific cerebral aneurysms. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 27:1665–1710. doi:10.1002/cnm.1433 MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

136.

Takizawa K, Spielman T, Moorman C, Tezduyar TE (2012) Fluid–structure interaction modeling of spacecraft parachutes for simulation-based design. J Appl Mech 79:010907. doi:10.1115/1.4005070 CrossRef

137.

Takizawa K, Brummer T, Tezduyar TE, Chen PR (2012) A comparative study based on patient-specific fluid–structure interaction modeling of cerebral aneurysms. J Appl Mech 79:010908. doi:10.1115/1.4005071 CrossRef

138.

Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2012) Bringing them down safely. Mech Eng 134:34–37

139.

Tezduyar TE (2004) Finite element methods for fluid dynamics with moving boundaries and interfaces. In: Stein E, Borst RD, Hughes TJR (eds) Encyclopedia of computational mechanics, vol 3. Wiley, New York

140.

Rubin G, Paik D, Johnson P, Napel S (1998) Measurement of the aorta and its branches with helical CT. Radiology 206:823–829CrossRef

141.

Antiga L, Piccinelli M, Botti L, Ene-Iordache B, Remuzzi A, Steinman DA (2008) An image-based modeling framework for patient-specific computational hemodynamics. Med Biol Eng Comput 46:1097–1112CrossRef

142.

Geuzaine C, Remacle J-F (2009) Gmsh: a three-dimensional finite element mesh generator with built-in pre- and post-processing facilities. Int J Numer Methods Eng 79:1309–1331MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

143.

Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE (2004) Influence of wall elasticity on image-based blood flow simulation. Jpn Soc Mech Eng J A 70:1224–1231 in JapaneseCrossRef

144.

Takizawa K, Schjodt K, Puntel A, Kostov N, Tezduyar TE (2013) Patient-specific computational analysis of the influence of a stent on the unsteady flow in cerebral aneurysms. Comput Mech 51:1061–1073. doi:10.1007/s00466-012-0790-y

145.

Chung J, Hulbert GM (1993) A time integration algorithm for structural dynamics withimproved numerical dissipation: the generalized-\(\alpha \) method. J Appl Mech 60:371–375MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

146.

Saad Y, Schultz M (1986) GMRES: a generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems. SIAM J Sci Stat Comput 7:856–869MATHMathSciNetCrossRef

Title: FSI analysis of the blood flow and geometrical characteristics in the thoracic aorta
Authors: Hiroshi Suito
Kenji Takizawa
Viet Q. H. Huynh
Daniel Sze
Takuya Ueda
Publication date: 01-10-2014
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: Computational Mechanics / Issue 4/2014
Print ISSN: 0178-7675
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0924
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-1017-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 4/2014

Coronary arterial dynamics computation with medical-image-based time-dependent anatomical models and element-based zero-stress state estimates

Fluid–structure interaction analysis of bioprosthetic heart valves: significance of arterial wall deformation

Shape optimization of pulsatile ventricular assist devices using FSI to minimize thrombotic risk

Hydrodynamic interaction between two red blood cells in simple shear flow: its impact on the rheology of a semi-dilute suspension

A reduced-order model based on the coupled 1D-3D finite element simulations for an efficient analysis of hemodynamics problems

A matrix-form GSM–CFD solver for incompressible fluids and its application to hemodynamics