Skip to main content
Top

2023 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

3. Impact Investments Measurement: Bridging Research and Practice

Authors : Eugenia Strano, Alessandro Rizzello, Annarita Trotta

Published in: Contemporary Issues in Sustainable Finance

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Intentionality and measurable impact are the key characteristics that allow the differentiation of impact investing from conventional forms of investment. Over the past decade, impact measurement has become a common method for evaluating the financial and social return generated by impact investments, and it is relevant for all impact stakeholders, such as impact investors and intermediaries, investees and social enterprises, public administrations and governments. This study was performed to provide an empirical analysis of some practices useful for improving the consistency, effectiveness and applicability of impact measurement. Using a qualitative approach based on a case study analysis, the paper investigates two measurement tools: Social Return on Investment (SROI) and balanced scorecard (BSC). The analysis performed uses various perspectives and concepts, and based on the evidence found, it opens interesting future research directions into the impact measurement field. The findings of this study add to the existing body of knowledge with “insights” for bridging the gap between theory and practice.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Arvidson, M., Lyon, F., McKay, S., & Moro, D. (2013). Valuing the social? The nature and controversies of measuring social return on investment (SROI). Voluntary Sector Review, 4(1), 3–18.CrossRef Arvidson, M., Lyon, F., McKay, S., & Moro, D. (2013). Valuing the social? The nature and controversies of measuring social return on investment (SROI). Voluntary Sector Review, 4(1), 3–18.CrossRef
go back to reference Asiaei, K., & Bontis, N. (2019). Using a balanced scorecard to manage corporate social responsibility. Knowledge and Process Management, 26(4), 371–379.CrossRef Asiaei, K., & Bontis, N. (2019). Using a balanced scorecard to manage corporate social responsibility. Knowledge and Process Management, 26(4), 371–379.CrossRef
go back to reference Bolis, M., Sahan, E., West, C., Irani, I., & Nash, R. (2017). Impact investing: Who are we serving? A case of mismatch between supply and demand. Bolis, M., Sahan, E., West, C., Irani, I., & Nash, R. (2017). Impact investing: Who are we serving? A case of mismatch between supply and demand.
go back to reference Boyd, J. (2004). Measuring social impact: The foundation of social return on investment (SROI). New Economics Foundation/London Business School. Boyd, J. (2004). Measuring social impact: The foundation of social return on investment (SROI). New Economics Foundation/London Business School.
go back to reference Caseau, C., & Grolleau, G. (2020). Impact investing: Killing two birds with one stone? Financial Analysts Journal, 76(4), 40–52.CrossRef Caseau, C., & Grolleau, G. (2020). Impact investing: Killing two birds with one stone? Financial Analysts Journal, 76(4), 40–52.CrossRef
go back to reference Chen, S., & Harrison, R. (2020). Beyond profit vs. purpose: Transactional-relational practices in impact investing. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 14, e00182. Chen, S., & Harrison, R. (2020). Beyond profit vs. purpose: Transactional-relational practices in impact investing. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 14, e00182.
go back to reference Costa, E. (2021). Challenges for social impact measurement in the non-profit sector. In A research agenda for social finance (pp. 127–152). Edward Elgar Publishing. Costa, E. (2021). Challenges for social impact measurement in the non-profit sector. In A research agenda for social finance (pp. 127–152). Edward Elgar Publishing.
go back to reference Davies, L. E., Taylor, P., Ramchandani, G., & Christy, E. (2019). Social return on investment (SROI) in sport: A model for measuring the value of participation in England. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 11(4), 585–605.CrossRef Davies, L. E., Taylor, P., Ramchandani, G., & Christy, E. (2019). Social return on investment (SROI) in sport: A model for measuring the value of participation in England. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 11(4), 585–605.CrossRef
go back to reference Epstein, M. J., & Yuthas, K. (2017). Measuring and improving social impacts: A guide for nonprofits, companies, and impact investors. Routledge. Epstein, M. J., & Yuthas, K. (2017). Measuring and improving social impacts: A guide for nonprofits, companies, and impact investors. Routledge.
go back to reference Gębczyńska, A., & Brajer-Marczak, R. (2020). Review of selected performance measurement models used in public administration. Administrative Sciences, 10(4), 99.CrossRef Gębczyńska, A., & Brajer-Marczak, R. (2020). Review of selected performance measurement models used in public administration. Administrative Sciences, 10(4), 99.CrossRef
go back to reference Gianoncelli, A., & Gaggiotti, G. (2021). Managing for impact: The role of investors’ networks in enhancing appropriate impact measurement and management practices. In Generation Impact (pp. 219–233). Emerald Publishing Limited. Gianoncelli, A., & Gaggiotti, G. (2021). Managing for impact: The role of investors’ networks in enhancing appropriate impact measurement and management practices. In Generation Impact (pp. 219–233). Emerald Publishing Limited.
go back to reference Gibbon, J., & Dey, C. (2011). Developments in social impact measurement in the third sector: Scaling up or dumbing down? Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 31(1), 63–72. Gibbon, J., & Dey, C. (2011). Developments in social impact measurement in the third sector: Scaling up or dumbing down? Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 31(1), 63–72.
go back to reference Grieco, C. (2015). Assessing social impact of social enterprises: Does one size really fit all? (pp. 13–15). Springer.CrossRef Grieco, C. (2015). Assessing social impact of social enterprises: Does one size really fit all? (pp. 13–15). Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference Hoque, Z. (2014). 20 years of studies on the balanced scorecard: Trends, accomplishments, gaps and opportunities for future research. The British Accounting Review, 46(1), 33–59.CrossRef Hoque, Z. (2014). 20 years of studies on the balanced scorecard: Trends, accomplishments, gaps and opportunities for future research. The British Accounting Review, 46(1), 33–59.CrossRef
go back to reference Islam, S. M. (2021). Impact investing in social sector organisations: A systematic review and research agenda. Accounting & Finance. Islam, S. M. (2021). Impact investing in social sector organisations: A systematic review and research agenda. Accounting & Finance.
go back to reference Kah, S., & Akenroye, T. (2020). Evaluation of social impact measurement tools and techniques: A systematic review of the literature. Social Enterprise Journal. Kah, S., & Akenroye, T. (2020). Evaluation of social impact measurement tools and techniques: A systematic review of the literature. Social Enterprise Journal.
go back to reference Kaplan, R. S. (2001). Strategic performance measurement and management in nonprofit organisations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 11(3), 353–370.CrossRef Kaplan, R. S. (2001). Strategic performance measurement and management in nonprofit organisations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 11(3), 353–370.CrossRef
go back to reference Kaplan, R. S., & McMillan, D. (2020). Updating the balanced scorecard for triple bottom line strategies (Harvard Business School Accounting & Management Unit Working Paper), 21–28. Kaplan, R. S., & McMillan, D. (2020). Updating the balanced scorecard for triple bottom line strategies (Harvard Business School Accounting & Management Unit Working Paper), 21–28.
go back to reference Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard Business Press. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard Business Press.
go back to reference Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). The strategy-focused organisation: How balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Harvard Business Press. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). The strategy-focused organisation: How balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Harvard Business Press.
go back to reference Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2015). Balanced scorecard success: The Kaplan-Norton Collection (4 Books). Harvard Business Review Press. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2015). Balanced scorecard success: The Kaplan-Norton Collection (4 Books). Harvard Business Review Press.
go back to reference Kročil, O., & Pospíšil, R. (2018). Comprehensive measurement of social enterprise impact. Ekonomski Pregled, 69(5), 571–593.CrossRef Kročil, O., & Pospíšil, R. (2018). Comprehensive measurement of social enterprise impact. Ekonomski Pregled, 69(5), 571–593.CrossRef
go back to reference Lall, S. (2017). Measuring to improve versus measuring to prove: Understanding the adoption of social performance measurement practices in nascent social enterprises. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organisations, 28(6), 2633–2657. Lall, S. (2017). Measuring to improve versus measuring to prove: Understanding the adoption of social performance measurement practices in nascent social enterprises. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organisations, 28(6), 2633–2657.
go back to reference Lall, S. A. (2019). From Legitimacy to learning: how impact measurement perceptions and practices evolve in social enterprise–social finance organisation relationships. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Non profit Organisations, 30(3), 562–577. Lall, S. A. (2019). From Legitimacy to learning: how impact measurement perceptions and practices evolve in social enterprise–social finance organisation relationships. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Non profit Organisations, 30(3), 562–577.
go back to reference Mäkelä, H. (2021). Roles of accounting for the contested Terrain of social enterprises. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 1–22. Mäkelä, H. (2021). Roles of accounting for the contested Terrain of social enterprises. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 1–22.
go back to reference Mamabolo, A., & Myres, K. (2020). Performance measurement in emerging market social enterprises using a balanced scorecard. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 11(1), 65–87.CrossRef Mamabolo, A., & Myres, K. (2020). Performance measurement in emerging market social enterprises using a balanced scorecard. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 11(1), 65–87.CrossRef
go back to reference Moody, M., Littlepage, L., & Paydar, N. (2015). Measuring social return on investment: Lessons from organizational implementation of SROI in the Netherlands and the United States. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 26(1), 19–37.CrossRef Moody, M., Littlepage, L., & Paydar, N. (2015). Measuring social return on investment: Lessons from organizational implementation of SROI in the Netherlands and the United States. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 26(1), 19–37.CrossRef
go back to reference O’Flynn, P., & Barnett, C. (2017). Evaluation and impact investing: A review of methodologies to assess social impact. O’Flynn, P., & Barnett, C. (2017). Evaluation and impact investing: A review of methodologies to assess social impact.
go back to reference Perrini, F., Costanzo, L. A., & Karatas-Ozkan, M. (2020). Measuring impact and creating change: A comparison of the main methods for social enterprises. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society. Perrini, F., Costanzo, L. A., & Karatas-Ozkan, M. (2020). Measuring impact and creating change: A comparison of the main methods for social enterprises. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society.
go back to reference Reeder, N., Jones, G. R., Loder, J., & Colantonio, A. (2014). Measuring impact: preliminary insights from interviews with impact investors. Reeder, N., Jones, G. R., Loder, J., & Colantonio, A. (2014). Measuring impact: preliminary insights from interviews with impact investors.
go back to reference Reisman, J., & Olazabal, V. (2016). Situating the next generation of impact measurement and evaluation for impact investing. Rockefeller Foundation. Reisman, J., & Olazabal, V. (2016). Situating the next generation of impact measurement and evaluation for impact investing. Rockefeller Foundation.
go back to reference Rohm, H., Halbach, L., Giannetto, D. F., Cannon, T., Bowyer, S., Brown, M. G., & Allen, J. R. (2006). A balancing act: Sustaining new directions. Balanced Scorecard Institute, PERFORM Magazine, 2(3), 1–8. Rohm, H., Halbach, L., Giannetto, D. F., Cannon, T., Bowyer, S., Brown, M. G., & Allen, J. R. (2006). A balancing act: Sustaining new directions. Balanced Scorecard Institute, PERFORM Magazine, 2(3), 1–8.
go back to reference Ruiz-Lozano, M., Tirado-Valencia, P., Sianes, A., Ariza-Montes, A., Fernández-Rodríguez, V., & López-Martín, M. (2020). SROI methodology for public administration decisions about financing with social criteria. A case study. Sustainability, 12(3), 1070.CrossRef Ruiz-Lozano, M., Tirado-Valencia, P., Sianes, A., Ariza-Montes, A., Fernández-Rodríguez, V., & López-Martín, M. (2020). SROI methodology for public administration decisions about financing with social criteria. A case study. Sustainability, 12(3), 1070.CrossRef
go back to reference Ryan, P. W., & Lyne, I. (2008). Social enterprise and the measurement of social value: Methodological issues with the calculation and application of the social return on investment. Education, Knowledge & Economy, 2(3), 223–237.CrossRef Ryan, P. W., & Lyne, I. (2008). Social enterprise and the measurement of social value: Methodological issues with the calculation and application of the social return on investment. Education, Knowledge & Economy, 2(3), 223–237.CrossRef
go back to reference Strano, E., Rizzello, A., & Trotta, A. (2022). Evaluation in impact investing: Where we are and where we are going. In Handbook of research on global aspects of sustainable finance in times of crises (pp. 46–76). IGI Global. Strano, E., Rizzello, A., & Trotta, A. (2022). Evaluation in impact investing: Where we are and where we are going. In Handbook of research on global aspects of sustainable finance in times of crises (pp. 46–76). IGI Global.
go back to reference Verrinder, N. B., Zwane, K., Vaca, S., & Nixon, D. (2018). Evaluative tools in impact investing: Three case studies on the use of theories of change. African Evaluation Journal, 6(2), 1–9.CrossRef Verrinder, N. B., Zwane, K., Vaca, S., & Nixon, D. (2018). Evaluative tools in impact investing: Three case studies on the use of theories of change. African Evaluation Journal, 6(2), 1–9.CrossRef
go back to reference Watson, K. J., & Whitley, T. (2017). Applying Social Return on Investment (SROI) to the built environment. Building Research & Information, 45(8), 875–891.CrossRef Watson, K. J., & Whitley, T. (2017). Applying Social Return on Investment (SROI) to the built environment. Building Research & Information, 45(8), 875–891.CrossRef
go back to reference Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. SAGE. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. SAGE.
Metadata
Title
Impact Investments Measurement: Bridging Research and Practice
Authors
Eugenia Strano
Alessandro Rizzello
Annarita Trotta
Copyright Year
2023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22539-0_3