Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Review of Industrial Organization
Published in: Review of Industrial Organization 2/2020

20-06-2020

Importing and Productivity: An Analysis of South African Manufacturing Firms

Authors: Lawrence Edwards, Marco Sanfilippo, Asha Sundaram

Published in: Review of Industrial Organization | Issue 2/2020

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper uses firm-level data from company tax declarations to analyse the complementary relationship between direct access to imported intermediate inputs and manufacturing firm productivity in South Africa. We provide support for the hypothesis of firm learning by importing. Our results show that importing is associated with higher productivity among South African manufacturing firms. In addition, importing a wider variety of intermediate inputs is associated with higher firm productivity, which is consistent with the idea that imported input varieties complement domestic varieties in production. We do not find strong evidence that imports from advanced economies are more relevant for productivity than are imports from emerging economies—which is contrary to expectations that the superior technology that is embedded in advanced economy imports would boost firm productivity.
previous article Deep Trade Agreements and Global Value Chains
next article Technology Adoption, Vertical Coordination in Value Chains, and FDI in Developing Countries: Panel Evidence from the Dairy Sector in India (Punjab)

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
The South African government imposed quotas on imports of Chinese apparel in 2007 and 2008 in an attempt to curb job losses in the apparel industry. This was followed by increases in tariff rates on apparel imports to the WTO bound rate.
 
2
Some caution is required in interpreting the data on trade in value added, as the estimates are strongly influenced by the database that is used. Farole (2016) estimates a 14% share of foreign value added in South Africa’s gross exports with the use of the Eora GVC database (https://​worldmrio.​com/​unctadgvc/​), whereas the OECD (2018) estimates a much higher 21–24% share over the period 2011–2014 with the use of its Trade in Value Added (TiVA) database.
 
3
Such emphasis on the role of importing is not new. Endogenous growth models emphasize the static and dynamic gains from importing new varieties of inputs and show that these contribute to a country’s growth via gains in productivity and by fostering the development of new varieties of domestic products (Broda and Weinstein 2006; Goldberg et al. 2010).
 
4
Firms’ performance is measured in their study as the number of varieties of products that are produced domestically.
 
5
Kasahara and Rodrigue (2008) on Chilean firms, and Bas and Strauss-Kahn (2014) on French firms adopt a similar approach.
 
6
Khandelwal (2010) proposes a more sophisticated measure of quality accounting for prices and market shares at the product level. Both Colantone and Crinò (2014) and Bas and Strauss-Kahn (2015) adopt this measure to account for the ‘quality’ mechanism in their analyses.
 
7
A notable exception is the work by Abreha (2019), who finds sizeable impacts of importing on productivity for Ethiopian manufacturing plants. Foster-McGregor et al. (2014) estimate labour productivity (sales per employee) premia between 79 and 113 per cent for two-way traders and between 36 and 64 per cent, respectively, for exporter-only and importer-only firms with the use of a cross-section of firm data for 19 sub-Saharan African countries. Unlike their study, we use a panel of firm data and measure productivity with the use of estimates of total factor productivity (TFP).
 
8
The transaction database includes firm-level information on the value, quantity, and destination/origin on trade flows at the 8-digit level of the Harmonized System (HS) over the period 2009–2014. To ensure consistency in product classification over time, the HS8-digit data were converted to the 6-digit level of the 2007 revision of the HS classification.
 
9
According to the World Bank Enterprise data for South Africa in 2007, indirect exporters and indirect importers make up 6.5 per cent and 16–18.5 per cent, respectively, of manufacturing firms. The World Bank Enterprise data shares of direct exporters and importers are broadly consistent with our shares that use the SARS data and range from 17 to 23% for exporters and 19–25 per cent for importers, depending on the sample weights that are used. The average share of direct exporters and importers over the 2009–2013 period based on the SARS data is calculated at 24 and 25 per cent, respectively (Edwards et al. 2018).
 
10
The slight decline to just under 23,000 in 2013 reflects the late submission by some firms of their income tax statements to SARS. In a robustness analysis in “Appendix” Table 6, we ensure that our baseline results are robust to the exclusion of 2013.
 
11
Participation in direct importing is unexpectedly low in the Motor vehicles industry. A possible explanation is that international trade in motor vehicles is conducted through subdivisions within the motor industry conglomerates as opposed to directly by the plant.
 
12
The correlation coefficient across industries of the fraction of exporters and importers is 0.9.
 
13
Bernard et al. (2018) find that the 3 percent of US manufacturing firm importers that sourced 11 or more products from 11 or more countries accounted for approximately 76 per cent of import value in the US for 2007. The top 5 percentiles of manufacturing firms by total trade (exports plus imports) in their data accounted for 94.9 per cent of the total value of imports. In contrast, the equivalent share for South African manufacturing firms that import is 60 per cent.
 
14
The estimates do not take into account firm exit as it is not possible to determine whether missing firm observations in the income tax database denote firm exit or failure to submit a tax return. See Kreuser and Newman (2018) for details on the estimates of the TFP.
 
15
We don’t have information on the educational qualifications of works. Consequently, we measure the skilled labour share as the share of workers within a firm who earn a salary of more than 20,000 Rands per month. Capital is measured as the sum of the value of fixed assets (property, plant, and equipment) that is reported by each firm.
 
16
Having an estimated parameter (TFP) as the dependent variable might in fact introduce heteroskedasticity (Saxonhouse 1976).
 
17
Background analysis of the data indicates that 43 per cent of the firms did not change importing status over the period.
 
18
If we assume that all intermediate goods are symmetrically produced, then this ratio is equal to the range of domestic inputs that are purchased relative to the total range available (Kasahara and Rodrigue 2008). The variable is calculated as the (cost of sales—direct imports)/cost of sales. This indicator will over-estimate the domestic share in costs for firms that use indirectly imported intermediate inputs in production.
 
19
High-income countries are defined according to the 2015 World Bank classification of countries by income. High-income economies are those with a gross national income per capita of US$12,736 or more. We also use OECD membership as our indicator of advanced economies. The results are very similar.
 
Literature
Ackerberg, D., Benkard, C. L., Berry, S., & Pakes, A. (2007). Econometric tools for analyzing market outcomes. In J. Heckman & E. Leamer (Eds.), Handbook of econometrics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Amiti, M., & Konings, J. (2007). Trade liberalization, intermediate inputs, and productivity: Evidence from Indonesia. American Economic Review, 97(5), 1611–1638.
Bas, M. (2012). Input-trade liberalization and firm export decisions: Evidence from Argentina. Journal of Development Economics, 97(2), 481–493.
Bas, M., & Strauss-Kahn, V. (2014). Does importing more inputs raise exports? Firm-level evidence from France. Review of World Economics, 150(2), 241–275.
Bas, M., & Strauss-Kahn, V. (2015). Input-trade liberalization, export prices and quality upgrading. Journal of International Economics, 95, 250–262.
Bernard, A. B., Jensen, J. B., Redding, S. J., & Schott, P. K. (2007). Firms in international trade. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(3), 105–130.
Bernard, A. B., Jensen, J. B., Redding, S. J., & Schott, P. K. (2018). Global Firms. Journal of Economic Literature, 56(2), 565–619.
Broda, C., & Weinstein, D. E. (2006). Globalization and the gains from variety. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2), 541–585.
Castellani, D., Serti, F., & Tomasi, C. (2010). Firms in international trade: Importers’ and exporters’ heterogeneity in Italian manufacturing industry. The World Economy, 33(3), 424–457.
Colantone, I., & Crinò, R. (2014). New imported inputs, new domestic products. Journal of International Economics, 92(1), 147–165.
Damijan, J. P., Konings, J., & Polanec, S. (2014). Import churning and export performance of multi-product firms. The World Economy, 37(11), 1483–1506.
de Loecker, J. (2007). Do exports generate higher productivity? Evidence from Slovenia. Journal of International Economics, 73(1), 69–98.
Eaton, J., & Kortum, S. (2001). Technology, trade, and growth: A unified framework. European Economic Review, 45, 742–755.
Edwards, L. (2001). Globalisation and the skill bias of occupational employment in South Africa. South African Journal of Economics, 69(1), 40–71.
Edwards, L. (2005). Has South Africa liberalised its trade? South African Journal of Economics, 73(4), 754–775.
Edwards, L., & Jenkins, R. (2015). The impact of Chinese import penetration on the south african manufacturing sector. Journal of Development Studies, 51(4), 447–463.
Edwards, L., Sanfilippo, M., & Sundaram, A. (2018). Importing and firm export performance: New evidence from South Africa. South African Journal of Economics, 86(S1), 79–95.
Erten, B., Leight, J., & Tregenna, F. (2019). Trade liberalization and local labor market adjustment in South Africa. Journal of International Economics, 118(May), 448–467.
Fan, H., Li, Y. A., & Yeaple, S. R. (2015). Trade liberalization, quality, and export prices. Review of Economics and Statistics, 97(5), 1033–1051.
Farole, T. (2016). Factory Southern Africa?: SACU in global value chains—Summary report. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.
Feng, L., Li, Z., & Swenson, D. L. (2012). The Connection between Imported Intermediate Inputs and Exports: Evidence from Chinese Firms. NBER Working Paper 18260. Washington, D.C.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Foster-McGregor, N., Isaksson, A., & Kaulich, F. (2014). Importing, exporting and performance in sub-Saharan African manufacturing firms. Review of World Economics, 150(2), 309–336.
Goldberg, P. K., Khandelwal, A. K., Pavcnik, N., & Topalova, P. (2010). Imported intermediate inputs and domestic product growth: Evidence from India. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(4), 1727–1767.
Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and growth in the global economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Grossman, G. M., & Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2008). Trading tasks: A simple theory of offshoring. American Economic Review, 98(5), 1978–1997.
Halpern, L., Koren, M., & Szeidl, A. (2015). Imported inputs and productivity. American Economic Review, 105(12), 3660–3703.
Jenkins, R. (2008). Trade, technology and employment in South Africa. Journal of Development Studies, 44(1), 60–79.
Kasahara, H., & Lapham, B. (2013). Productivity and the decision to import and export: Theory and evidence. Journal of International Economics, 89(2), 297–316.
Kasahara, H., & Rodrigue, J. (2008). Does the use of imported intermediates increase productivity? Plant-level Evidence. Journal of Development Economics, 87(1), 106–118.
Khandelwal, A. (2010). The long and short (of) quality ladders. Review of Economic Studies, 77(4), 1450–1476.
Kreuser, F., & Newman, C. (2018). Total factor productivity in South African manufacturing. South African Journal of Economics, 86(S1), 40–78.
Kugler, M., & Verhoogen, E. (2009). Plants and Imported Inputs: New Facts and an Interpretation. American Economic Review, 99(2), 501–507.
Manova, K., & Zhang, Z. (2012). Export prices across firms and destinations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127, 379–436.
Matthee, M., Rankin, N., Webb, T., & Bezuidenhout, C. (2018). Understanding manufactured exporters at the firm-level: New Insights from using SARS administrative data. South African Journal of Economics, 86(S1), 96–119.
Melitz, M. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695–1725.
OECD. (2018). Trade in value added: South Africa. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Rodrik, D. (2008). Understanding South Africa’s economic puzzles. Economics of Transition, 16(4), 769–797.
Saxonhouse, G. R. (1976). Estimated parameters as dependent variables. The American Economic Review, 66(1), 178–183.
Schor, A. (2004). Heterogeneous productivity response to tariff reduction: Evidence from Brazilian manufacturing firms. Journal of Development Economics, 75(2), 373–396.
Topalova, P., & Khandelwal, A. (2011). Trade liberalization and firm productivity: The case of India. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(3), 995–1009.
Wagner, J. (2012). International trade and firm performance: A survey of empirical studies since 2006. Review of World Economics, 148(2), 235–267.
Wagner, J. (2016). A survey of empirical studies using transaction level data on exports and imports. Review of World Economics, 152(1), 215–225.
Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). On estimating firm-level production functions using proxy variables to control for unobservables. Economics Letters, 104(3), 112–114.
World Bank (2017). Measuring and analyzing the impact of GVCs on economic development. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.
World Bank (2020). World Development Report 2020—Trading for Development in the Age of Global Value Chains. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.
Metadata
Title
Importing and Productivity: An Analysis of South African Manufacturing Firms
Authors
Lawrence Edwards
Marco Sanfilippo
Asha Sundaram
Publication date
20-06-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Review of Industrial Organization / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0889-938X
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7160
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-020-09765-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

Review of Industrial Organization 2/2020 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Make or Buy: Offshoring of Services Functions in Manufacturing

OriginalPaper

Made in the World? Global Value Chains in the Midst of Rising Protectionism

OriginalPaper

Critically Important: The Heterogeneous Effect of Diplomatic Tensions on Trade

OriginalPaper

Deep Trade Agreements and Global Value Chains

OriginalPaper

Services Input Intensity and US Manufacturing Employment Responses to the China Shock

OriginalPaper

Policy Uncertainty, Trade and Global Value Chains: Some Facts, Many Questions