Top

Small Business Economics

Published in:

26-05-2021

Innovation ambidexterity, resource configuration and firm growth: is smallness a liability or an asset?

Authors: Young Rok Choi, Seongwook Ha, Youngbae Kim

Published in: Small Business Economics | Issue 4/2022

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

This study examines when small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) benefit from innovation ambidexterity for their growth. We argue that innovation ambidexterity in SMEs is sensitive to resource configuration, necessitating a careful fit assessment among firms’ internal resources (firm size), external resources (customer concentration) and the forms of innovation ambidexterity. Patent and utility model data from 912 firm-years for the 2000–2017 period in the Korean electronic parts industry were analysed using a feasible generalised least squares (FGLS) model. Consistent with our prediction, we establish that firm size is negatively related to the growth effect of balanced innovation ambidexterity (BIA), but positively to that of combined innovation ambidexterity (CIA), and that customer concentration is positively related to the growth effect of CIA. The three-way interaction patterns further demonstrate that smaller firms with high customer concentration achieve the best growth when pursuing BIA, whereas the same configuration can lead to the worst growth if they adopt CIA.

previous article Ecosystem dynamics: exploring the interplay within fintech entrepreneurial ecosystems

next article Does working at a start-up pay off?

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1988). Innovation in large and small firms: an empirical analysis. American Economic Review, 78(4), 678–690. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1811167

Ahuja, G., & Lampert, C. M. (2001). Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 521–543. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.176CrossRef

Aldrich, H., & Auster, E. R. (1986). Even dwarfs started small: Liabilities of age and size and their strategic implications. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 8, 165–198. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1988-12,412-001

Andrevski, G., & Ferrier, W. J. (2019). Does it pay to compete aggressively? Contingent roles of internal and external resources. Journal of Management, 45(2), 620–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316673718CrossRef

Arend, R. J. (2014). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: How firm age and size affect the ‘capability enhancement–SME performance’ relationship. Small Business Economics, 42(1), 33–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-012-9461-9CrossRef

Arend, R. J., & Wisner, J. D. (2005). Small business and supply chain management: Is there a fit? Journal of Business Venturing, 20(3), 403–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.11.003CrossRef

Atuahene-Gima, K., & Murray, J. Y. (2007). Exploratory and exploitative learning in new product development: A social capital perspective on new technology ventures in China. Journal of International Marketing, 15(2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1509/jimk.15.2.1CrossRef

Audretsch, D. B. (2004). Sustaining innovation and growth: Public policy support for entrepreneurship. Industry and Innovation, 11(3), 167–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/1366271042000265366CrossRef

Bamiatzi, V. C., & Kirchmaier, T. (2014). Strategies for superior performance under adverse conditions: A focus on small and medium-sized high-growth firms. International Small Business Journal, 32(3), 259–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242612459534CrossRef

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108CrossRef

Baum, J. R., Locke, E. A., & Smith, K. G. (2001). A multidimensional model of venture growth. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 292–303. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069456CrossRef

Belderbos, R., Carree, M., & Lokshin, B. (2004). Cooperative R&D and firm performance. Research Policy, 33(10), 1477–1492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.003CrossRef

Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238–256. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.9416096CrossRef

Bierly, P., & Daly, P. S. (2007). Alternative knowledge strategies, competitive environment, and organizational performance in small manufacturing firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31, 493–516. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00185.xCrossRef

Birley, S., & Westhead, P. (1990). Growth and performance contrasts between ‘types’ of small firms. Strategic Management Journal, 11(7), 535–557. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250110705CrossRef

Blau, P. M. (1970). A formal theory of differentiation in organizations. American Sociological Review, 35, 201–218. https://doi.org/10.2307/2093199CrossRef

Bluedorn, A. C. (1993). Pilgrim’s progress: Trends and convergence in research on organizational size and environments. Journal of Management, 19(2), 163–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639301900201CrossRef

Bommer, W. H., Johnson, J. L., Rich, G. A., Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1995). On the interchangeability of objective and subjective measures of employee performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 48(3), 587–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01772.xCrossRef

Box, G. E., Hunter, W. H., & Hunter, S. (1978). Statistics for experimenters. (Vol. 664)John Wiley and sons.

Burgelman, R. A. (1994). Fading memories: A process theory of strategic business exit in dynamic environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 24–24. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393493CrossRef

Burt, R. S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 339–365.https://doi.org/10.2307/2393923

Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20(4), 781–796. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0426CrossRef

Carreira, C., & Silva, F. (2010). No deep pockets: Some stylized empirical results on firms’ financial constraints. Journal of Economic Surveys, 24(4), 731–753. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2009.00619.xCrossRef

Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. (2000). The demography of corporations and industries. Princeton University Press.CrossRef

Chandler, G. N., McKelvie, A., & Davidsson, P. (2009). Asset specificity and behavioral uncertainty as moderators of the sales growth—Employment growth relationship in emerging ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(4), 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.002CrossRef

Chang, Y. Y., & Hughes, M. (2012). Drivers of innovation ambidexterity in small-to medium-sized firms. European Management Journal, 30(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2011.08.003CrossRef

Chen, M. J., & Hambrick, D. C. (1995). Speed, stealth, and selective attack: How small firms differ from large firms in competitive behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 453–482. https://doi.org/10.5465/256688CrossRef

Choi, Y. R., & Shepherd, D. A. (2005). Stakeholder perceptions of age and other dimensions of newness. Journal of Management, 31(4), 573–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206304272294CrossRef

Chowdhury, S. (2011). The moderating effects of customer driven complexity on the structure and growth relationship in young firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(3), 306–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.10.001CrossRef

Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business School Press.

Christensen, J. F. S. (1996). Innovative assets and inter-asset linkages—A resource-based approach to innovation. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 4(3), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599600000009CrossRef

Cockburn, I., & Grilliches, Z. (1988). The estimation and measurement of spillover effects of R&D investment: Industry effects and appropriability measures in stock market’s valuation of R&D and patents. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 78, 419–423.

Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553CrossRef

d’Amboise, G., & Muldowney, M. (1988). Management theory for small business: Attempts and requirements. Academy of Management Review, 13(2), 226–240. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1988.4306873CrossRef

Degryse, H., de Goeij, P., & Kappert, P. (2012). The impact of firm and industry characteristics on small firms’ capital structure. Small Business Economics, 38(4), 431–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9281-8CrossRef

Delmar, F., Davidsson, P., & Gartner, W. B. (2003). Arriving at the high-growth firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 189–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00080-0CrossRef

Djupdal, K., & Westhead, P. (2015). Environmental certification as a buffer against the liabilities of newness and smallness: Firm performance benefits. International Small Business Journal, 33(2), 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242613486688CrossRef

Dolan, C., & Humphrey, J. (2000). Governance and trade in fresh vegetables: The impact of UK supermarkets on the African horticulture industry. Journal of Development Studies, 37(2), 147–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/713600072CrossRef

Fackler, D., Schnabel, C., & Wagner, J. (2013). Establishment exits in Germany: The role of size and age. Small Business Economics, 41(3), 683–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-012-9450-zCrossRef

Fiegenbaum, A., & Karnani, A. (1991). Output flexibility—a competitive advantage for small firms. Strategic Management Journal, 12(2), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120203CrossRef

Fischer, E., & Reuber, A. R. (2004). Contextual antecedents and consequences of relationships between young firms and distinct types of dominant exchange partners. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(5), 681–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.09.005CrossRef

Fritsch, M., & Lukas, R. (2001). Who cooperates on R&D? Research Policy, 30(2), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00115-8CrossRef

Fujimoto, T. (2007). Architecture-based comparative advantage: A design information view of manufacturing. Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 4(1), 55–112. https://doi.org/10.14441/eier.4.55CrossRef

Gedajlovic, E., Cao, Q., & Zhang, H. (2012). Corporate shareholdings and organizational ambidexterity in high-tech SMEs: Evidence from a transitional economy. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(6), 652–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.06.001CrossRef

Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159573CrossRef

Gimenez-Fernandez, E. M., Sandulli, F. D., & Bogers, M. (2020). Unpacking liabilities of newness and smallness in innovative start-ups: Investigating the differences in innovation performance between new and older small firms. Research Policy, 49(10), 104049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104049CrossRef

Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Larraza-Kintana, M., & Makri, M. (2003). The determinants of executive compensation in family-controlled public corporations. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 226–237. https://doi.org/10.5465/30040616CrossRef

Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311CrossRef

Greene, W. H. (2012). Econometric analysis. Prentice Hall.

Grupp, H., Schwitalla, B., Schmoch, U., & Granberg, A. (1990). Developing industrial robot technology in Sweden, West Germany, Japan, and the U.S.A. In J. Sigurdson (Ed.), Measuring the dynamics of technological change: 106–129. Pinter Publishers.

Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693–706. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22083026CrossRef

Hansen, B., & Hamilton, R. T. (2011). Factors distinguishing small firm growers and non-growers. International Small Business Journal, 29(3), 278–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242610381846CrossRef

He, Z., & Wong, P. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15, 481–494. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0078CrossRef

Heide, J. B., & John, G. (1988). The role of dependence balancing in safeguarding transaction-specific assets in conventional channels. Journal of Marketing, 52(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200103CrossRef

Heo, M., & Leon, A. C. (2010). Sample sizes required to detect two-way and three-way interactions involving slope differences in mixed-effects linear models. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 20(4), 787–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/10543401003618819CrossRef

Hewitt-Dundas, N. (2006). Resource and capability constraints to innovation in small and large plants. Small Business Economics, 26(3), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-2140-3CrossRef

Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., & Hill, C. W. (1993). Managerial incentives and investment in R&D in large multiproduct firms. Organization Science, 4(2), 325–341. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.4.2.325CrossRef

Hult, R. (2020). Significant electronic technology trends over the past 20 years. Available online: https://www.connectorsupplier.com/significant-electronic-technology-trends-over-the-past-20-years/ (Accessed on 27 September 2020).

ILO. (2014). Ups and downs in the electronics industry: Fluctuating production and the use of temporary and other forms of employment, Sectoral Policies Department.

Jansen, D., Von Goertz, R., & Heidler, R. (2009). Knowledge production and the structure of collaboration networks in two scientific fields. Scientometrics, 83(1), 219–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0022-1CrossRef

Jansen, J. J. P., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576CrossRef

Josefy, M., Kuban, S., Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. A. (2015). All things great and small: Organizational size, boundaries of the firm, and a changing environment. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 715–802. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2015.1027086CrossRef

Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1183–1194. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069433CrossRef

Katila, R., & Shane, S. (2005). When does lack of resources make new firms innovative? Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 814–829. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.18803924CrossRef

Ketchen, D. J., Jr., Thomas, J. B., & Snow, C. C. (1993). Organizational configurations and performance: A comparison of theoretical approaches. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1278–1313. https://doi.org/10.5465/256812CrossRef

Kim, Y. K., Kim, T. U., Park, S. T., & Jung, J. R. (2016). Establishing the importance weight of appropriability mechanism by using AHP: The case of the China’s electronic industry. Cluster Computing, 19(3), 1635–1646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-016-0608-3CrossRef

Kleinbaum, D. G., Kupper, L. L., & Muller, K. E. (1988). Applied regression analysis and other multivariate methods. PWS-Kent.

Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1996). What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organization Science, 7(5), 502–518. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.5.502CrossRef

Larson, A. (1992). Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 76–104. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393534

Lee, S. G., Koo, C., & Nam, K. (2010). Cumulative strategic capability and performance of early movers and followers in the cyber market. International Journal of Information Management, 30(3), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.09.003CrossRef

Leenders, R. T., & Gabbay, S. M. (1999). CSC: An agenda for the future. In Corporate social capital and liability (pp. 483–494). Springer.

Lei, D., Hitt, M. A., & Bettis, R. (1996). Dynamic core competences through meta-learning and strategic context. Journal of Management, 22(4), 549–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639602200402CrossRef

Lerner, J. (1994). The importance of patent scope: An empirical analysis. Rand Journal of Economics, 25, 319–333. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555833CrossRef

Levinthal, D. A. (1997). Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Science, 43(7), 934–950. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.7.934CrossRef

Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009CrossRef

Lewin, A. Y., Long, C. P., & Carroll, T. N. (1999). The coevolution of new organizational forms. Organization Science, 10, 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.5.535CrossRef

Liñán, F., Paul, J., & Fayolle, A. (2019). SMEs and entrepreneurship in the era of globalization: Advances and theoretical approaches. Small Business Economics, 53, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00180-7CrossRef

Loveman, G., & Sengenberger, W. (1991). The re-emergence of small-scale production: An international comparison. Small Business Economics, 3(1), 1–37.CrossRef

Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306290712CrossRef

March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71CrossRef

Miller, D. (1996). Configurations revisited. Strategic Management Journal, 17(7), 505–512. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199607)17:7%3c505::AID-SMJ852%3e3.0.CO;2-ICrossRef

Mills, D. E., & Schumann, L. (1985). Industry structure with fluctuating demand. American Economic Review, 75(4), 758–767. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1821353

Murphy, K. R., & Russell, C. J. (2017). Mend it or end it: Redirecting the search for interactions in the organizational sciences. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 549–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115625322CrossRef

Nason, R. S., McKelvie, A., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2015). The role of organizational size in the heterogeneous nature of corporate entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 45(2), 279–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9632-6CrossRef

Nerkar, A. (2003). Old is good? The value of temporal exploration in the creation of new knowledge. Management Science, 49, 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.2.211.12747CrossRef

O’Reilly, C. A., III., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002CrossRef

O’Reilly, C. A., III., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 82(4), 74–83.

O’Reilly, C. A., III., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0025CrossRef

Ortega-Argilés, R., Vivarelli, M., & Voigt, P. (2009). R&D in SMEs: A paradox? Small Business Economics, 33(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9187-5CrossRef

Pennings, J. M., & Lee, K. (1999). Social capital of organization: Conceptualization, level of analysis, and performance implications. In Corporate social capital and liability (pp. 43–67). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5027-3_3

Penrose, E. G. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Wiley.

Priem, R. L., Li, S., & Carr, J. C. (2012). Insights and new directions from demand-side approaches to technology innovation, entrepreneurship, and strategic management research. Journal of Management, 38(1), 346–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311429614CrossRef

Quintana-García, C., & Benavides-Velasco, C. A. (2008). Innovative competence, exploration and exploitation: The influence of technological diversification. Research Policy, 37(3), 492–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.002CrossRef

Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. (2001). Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22(4), 287–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.160CrossRef

Rothaermel, F. T., & Alexandre, M. T. (2009). Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Organization Science, 20(4), 759–780. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0404CrossRef

Rumelt, R. P. (1995). Inertia and transformation. In Resource-based and evolutionary theories of the firm: Towards a synthesis (pp. 101–132). Springer.

Scherbaum, C. A., & Ferreter, J. M. (2009). Estimating statistical power and required sample sizes for organizational research using multilevel modeling. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 347–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107308906CrossRef

Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Socialism, capitalism and democracy. Harper and Brothers.

Short, J. C., McKelvie, A., Ketchen, D. J., Jr., & Chandler, G. N. (2009). Firm and industry effects on firm performance: A generalization and extension for new ventures. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.53CrossRef

Sidhu, J. S., Commandeur, H. R., & Volberda, H. W. (2007). The multifaceted nature of exploration and exploitation: Value of supply, demand, and spatial search for innovation. Organization Science, 18(1), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0212CrossRef

Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., Veiga, J. F., & Souder, D. (2009). A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity’s conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 864–894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00841.xCrossRef

Smith, H. L., Dickson, K., & Smith, S. L. (1991). “There are two sides to every story”: Innovation and collaboration within networks of large and small firms. Research Policy, 20(5), 457–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(91)90069-3CrossRef

Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Sage.

Solís-Molina, M., Hernández-Espallardo, M., & Rodríguez-Orejuela, A. (2018). Performance implications of organizational ambidexterity versus specialization in exploitation or exploration: The role of absorptive capacity. Journal of Business Research, 91, 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.06.001CrossRef

Son, B. G., Ha, B. C., & Lee, T. H. (2019). Small and medium-sized enterprises’ collaborative buyer–supplier relationships: Boundary spanning individual perspectives. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(3), 966–988. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12423CrossRef

Suh, J. (2002). The industrial competitiveness of Korea’s IT industry. Preliminary Draft, Korea Development Institute.

Terziovski, M. (2010). Innovation practice and its performance implications in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the manufacturing sector: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 31(8), 892–902. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.841CrossRef

Tether, B. S. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why: An empirical analysis. Research Policy, 31(6), 947–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00172-XCrossRef

Tripsas, M. (1997). Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Management Journal, 18(S1), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+%3c119::AID-SMJ921%3e3.0.CO;2-0CrossRef

Tsvetkova, A., Thill, J. C., & Strumsky, D. (2014). Metropolitan innovation, firm size, and business survival in a high-tech industry. Small Business Economics, 43(3), 661–676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9550-zCrossRef

Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165852CrossRef

Uotila, J., Maula, M., Keil, T., & Zahra, S. A. (2009). Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: Analysis of S&P 500 corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 30(2), 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.738CrossRef

Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35–67. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393808

Varum, C. A., & Rocha, V. C. (2012). The effect of crises on firm exit and the moderating effect of firm size. Economics Letters, 114(1), 94–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.09.015CrossRef

Voss, G. B., & Voss, Z. G. (2013). Strategic ambidexterity in small and medium-sized enterprises: Implementing exploration and exploitation in product and market domains. Organization Science, 24(5), 1459–1477. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0790CrossRef

Walker, R. D. (1995). Patents as scientific and technical literature. Scarecrow Press.

Wall, T. D., Michie, J., Patterson, M., Wood, S. J., Sheehan, M., Clegg, C. W., & West, M. (2004). On the validity of subjective measures of company performance. Personnel Psychology, 57(1), 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.tb02485.xCrossRef

Wang, S. L., Luo, Y., Maksimov, V., Sun, J., & Celly, N. (2019). Achieving temporal ambidexterity in new ventures. Journal of Management Studies, 56(4), 788–822. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12431CrossRef

Wei, S., Ke, W., Liu, H., Wei, K. K., & Hua, Z. (2013). Supply chain exploitation, exploration, and firm performance: Effects of top management and information technology capabilities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Information Systems.

Wei, Z., Yi, Y., & Guo, H. (2014). Organizational learning ambidexterity, strategic flexibility, and new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 832–847. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12126CrossRef

Weinzimmer, L. G., Nystrom, P. C., & Freeman, S. J. (1998). Measuring organizational growth: Issues, consequences and guidelines. Journal of Management, 24(2), 235–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639802400205CrossRef

Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2003). Aspiring for, and achieving growth: The moderating role of resources and opportunities. Journal of Management Studies, 40(8), 1919–1941. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-6486.2003.00406.xCrossRef

Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.01.001CrossRef

Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press.

Yli-Renko, H., & Janakiraman, R. (2008). How customer portfolio affects new product development in technology-based entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Marketing, 72(5), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.72.5.131CrossRef

Yli-Renko, H., Sapienza, H. J., & Hay, M. (2001). The role of contractual governance flexibility in realizing the outcomes of key customer relationships. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(6), 529–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00062-2CrossRef

Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995CrossRef

Zajac, E. J., Kraatz, M. S., & Bresser, R. K. (2000). Modeling the dynamics of strategic fit: A normative approach to strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 21(4), 429–453. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200004)21:4%3c429::AID-SMJ81%3e3.0.CO;2-%23CrossRef

Zimmermann, A., Hill, S., Birkinshaw, J., & Jäckel, M. (2018). Complements or substitutes? Investigating the interplay amongst drivers of ambidexterity in SMEs. Academy of Management Proceedings, Chicago. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2017.17518abstract

Title: Innovation ambidexterity, resource configuration and firm growth: is smallness a liability or an asset?
Authors: Young Rok Choi
Seongwook Ha
Youngbae Kim
Publication date: 26-05-2021
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Small Business Economics / Issue 4/2022
Print ISSN: 0921-898X
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0913
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00507-3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 4/2022

Short-term financial constraints and SMEs’ investment decision: evidence from the working capital channel

Who shuns entrepreneurship journals? Why? And what should we do about it?

Women in the boardroom: a bottom–up approach to the trickle-down effect

Bank failures, local business dynamics, and government policy

The early impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on business sales

Are there wages from “sin”? Working conditions spillover from paying bribe in Vietnam