Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Eurasian Business Review
Published in: Eurasian Business Review 2/2015

01-12-2015 | Original Paper

Innovation and export performance: do young and mature innovative firms differ?

Authors: Areti Gkypali, Apostolos Rafailidis, Kostas Tsekouras

Published in: Eurasian Business Review | Issue 2/2015

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The relevant literature is conflicted about the direction of causality between innovation and exports. In this paper we attempt to shed light on this relationship by setting a theoretical framework where a two-way causality is hypothesized to exist between these two firm activities. In addition, the role of firm age is highlighted as firms at different stages of their life cycle may face different prospects and constraints and thus develop different strategies to survive and grow. Such differential patterns may be even more intense due to the different knowledge and capabilities portfolio possessed by young and mature firms. Employing a sample of Greek Manufacturing R&D active firms for the year 2010, we estimate a multi-group path analysis for young and mature firms. Even though empirical results do not support the existence of a two-way causality between innovation and export performance, when we account for the moderating role of age it becomes evident that the direction of causality differs between young and mature firms. Also the indirect and direct effect of firms’ R&D stock is confirmed as an intermediate link within the innovation-export nexus.
previous article Effect of women’s labor market status on online grocery shopping, the case of Turkey

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Footnotes
1
Standard errors are computed using the Huber-White sandwich estimator thus, accounting for heteroscedasticity issues.
 
2
Gkypali and Tsekouras (2015) present in detail of the survey design and methodology.
 
3
In order to determine the age threshold robustness checks have been performed using alternative age thresholds either greater or lower than 15 years and results are available upon request. Estimation results are robust for alternative age thresholds however for firm age lower than 15 years the model fit deteriorated.
 
4
It should be noted that with respect to the estimation of indirect effects, MPlus uses the Sobel test to calculate indirect effects and employs the Delta method to calculate standard errors of the indirect effects. Simulation studies suggest parameter estimates and standard errors using MLR would be identical to those obtained with the bootstrapping procedure (Muthen and Muthen 2014).
 
Literature
Antonelli, C., & Scellato, G. (2013). Complexity and technological change: knowledge interactions and firm level total factor productivity. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 23, 77–96.CrossRef
Arvanitis S., Gkypali A. & Tsekouras K., (2014): Knowledge Base, Exporting Activities, Innovation Openness and Innovation Performance: A SEM Approach towards a Unifying Framework, KOF Working paper series No361.
Audretsch, D. (1991). New firm survival and the technological regime. Review of Economics and Statistics, 73, 411–450.
Audretsch (1997): Technological regimes, industrial demography and the evolution of industrial structures. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6, 49–82.
Autio, E., Sapienza, H., & Almeida, J. (2000). Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 909–924.CrossRef
Aw, B. Y., Roberts, M., & Xu, D. Y. (2011). R&D investment, exporting, and productivity dynamics. American Economic Review, 101, 1312–1344.CrossRef
Bartelsman, E., Scarpetta, S., & Schivardi, F. (2005). Comparative analysis of firm demographics and survival: evidence from micro-level sources in OECD countries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3, 365–391.CrossRef
Cassiman, B., Golovko, E., & Martinez-Ros, E. (2010). Innovation, exports, and productivity. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 28(4), 372–376.CrossRef
Cavusgil, T., & Knight, G. (2014). The born global firm: an entrepreneurial and capabilities perspective on early and rapid internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 46, 3–16.CrossRef
Clerides, S., Lach, S., & Tybout, J. (1998). Is learning by exporting important? micro-dynamic evidence from Colombia, Mexico, and Morocco. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 903–947.CrossRef
Coad, A., Segarra, A., & Teruel, M. (2013). Like milk or wine: does firm performance improve with age? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 24, 173–189.CrossRef
Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1989). Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal, 99, 569–596.CrossRef
Costantini, J., & Melitz, M. (2008): The dynamics of firm-level adjustment to trade liberalization. In: Helpman, E., Marin, D., Verdier, T. (Eds.), The Organization of Firms in a Global Economy. Harvard University Press.
Crespi, G., Criscuolo, C., & Haskel, J. (2008). Productivity, exporting, and the learning-by-exporting hypothesis: direct evidence from UK firrms. Canadian Journal of Economics, 41(2), 619–638.CrossRef
Esteve-Pérez, S., & Rodríguez, D. (2013). The dynamics of exports and R&D in SMEs,”. Small Business Economics, 41(1), 219–240.CrossRef
Filipescu, D., Prashantham, S., Rialp, A., & Rialp, J. (2013). Technological innovation and exports: unpacking their reciprocal causality. Journal of International Marketing, 21, 23–38.CrossRef
Girma, S., Görg, H., & Hanley, A. (2008). R&D and exporting: a comparison of British and Irish firms. Review of World Economics, 144, 749–772.CrossRef
Gkypali, A., & Tsekouras, K. (2015): Efficiency and Competitive Advantage based on R&D activities of low-tech firms: an antecedent of the decision to export?”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, forthcoming.
Gkypali, A., Tsekouras, K., & von Tunzelmann, N. (2012). Endogeneity between internationalization knowledge creation of global R&D leader firms: an econometric approach using Scoreboard data. Industrial Corporate Change, 21, 731–762.CrossRef
Valentini, E., & Golovko, G. (2011). Exploring the complementarity between innovation and export for SMEs’ growth. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(3), 362–380.CrossRef
Harris, R., & Li, Q. (2009). Exporting. R&D, and absorptive capacity in UK establishments, Oxford Economic Papers, 69(1), 74–103.
Harris R., & Moffatt J. (2011): R&D, Innovation and Exporting, SERC Discussion Paper 73, Spatial Economics Research Centre.
Hayduk, L. (1987). Structural equations modeling with LISREL. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Huergo, E., & Jaumandreu, J. (2004). Firms’ age, process innovation and productivity growth. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22(4), 541–559.CrossRef
Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm: a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments”. Journal of International Business Studies, 8, 23–32.CrossRef
Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. (2009). The Uppsala internationalization model revisited: from liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40, 1411–1433.CrossRef
Johanson, J., & Wiedersheim-Paul, F. (1975). The internationalization of the firm: four Swedish cases. Journal of Management Studies, 12(3), 305–322.CrossRef
Kafouros, M., Buckley, P., Sharp, J., & Wang, C. (2008). The role of internationalization in explaining innovation performance. Technovation, 28(1-2), 63–74.CrossRef
Klepper, S. (1996). ‘Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle. American Economic Review, 86(3), 562–583.
Knight, G., & Cavusgil, S. (2004). Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2), 124–141.CrossRef
Kobrin, S. (1991). An empirical analysis of the determinants of global integration’. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 17–37.CrossRef
Kylaheiko, K., Jantunen, A., Puumalainen, K., Saarenketo, S., & Tuppura, A. (2011). Innovation and internationalization as growth strategies: the role of technological capabilities and appropriability. International Business Review, 20, 508–520.CrossRef
Lachenmaier, S., & Woessmann, L. (2006). Does innovation cause exports? Evidence from exogenous innovation impulses and obstacles using German micro data, Oxford Economic Papers, 58(2), 317–350.
Lileeva, A., & Trefler, D. (2010). Improved access to foreign markets raises plant-level productivity for some plants. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125, 1051–1099.CrossRef
Love, J., & Ganotakis, P. (2013). Learning by exporting: lessons from high-technology SMEs. International Business Review, 22, 1–17.CrossRef
Love J., Roper S. (2013): SME Innovation, Exporting and Growth”, Enterprise Research Centre, White paper No.5.
Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. (1993). Technological regimes and firm behavior. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2, 45–72.CrossRef
Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. (1997). Technological regimes and sectoral patterns of innovative activities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6, 83–117.CrossRef
Máñez, J., M., Rochina-Barrachina J. A.., Sanchis-Llopis (2015): The Dynamic Linkages Among Exports, R&D and Productivity. The World Economy, forthcoming.
March, J. (1991). Exploration exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71–87.CrossRef
Mohnen, P., & Hall, B. (2013). Innovation and Productivity: an update. Eurasian Business Review, 3(1), 47–65.
Muthen, B., and Muthen, L. (2014). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen and Muthen.
Pla-Barber, J., & Alegre, J. (2007). Analysing the link between export intensity, innovation and firm size in a science-based industry. International Business Review, 16(3), 275–293.CrossRef
Quevedo, J., Pellegrino, G., Vivarelli, M. (2014): R&D drivers and age: Are young firms different? Research Policy, forthcoming.
Rosenberg, N. (1990). Why do firms do basic research (with their own money?). Research Policy, 19, 65–174.CrossRef
Salomon, R., & Shaver, J. (2005). Learning by exporting: new insights from examining firm innovation’. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 14, 431–460.CrossRef
von Tunzelmann, N., & Wang, Q. (2003). An evolutionary view of dynamic capabilities. Economie Appliquée, 6, 33–64.
Wagner, J. (2001). A Note on the firm size export relationship. Small Business Economics, 17(4), 229–237.CrossRef
Wagner, J. (2007). Exports and productivity: a survey of the evidence from firm-level data. The World Economy, 30, 60–82.CrossRef
Wakelin, K. (1998). Innovation and export behaviour at the firm level. Research Policy, 26(7-8), 829–841.CrossRef
Wilmore, L. (1992). Transnationals and foreign trade: evidence from Brazil’. Journal of Development Studies, 28, 314–335.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Innovation and export performance: do young and mature innovative firms differ?
Authors
Areti Gkypali
Apostolos Rafailidis
Kostas Tsekouras
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Eurasian Business Review / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 1309-4297
Electronic ISSN: 2147-4281
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-015-0030-4

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Eurasian Business Review 2/2015 Go to the issue

Original Paper

The impact of ownership structure and family board domination on voluntary disclosure for Jordanian listed companies

Original Paper

Again on trade elasticities: evidence from a selected sample of countries

Original Paper

The impact of deregulation on the movie box office after Taiwan’s entry into the WTO: the difference-in-differences estimation

Original Paper

Environmental and innovation policies for the evolution of green technologies: a survey and a test

Original Paper

The impact of the global financial crisis on cross-border mergers and acquisitions: a continental and industry analysis

Original Paper

Cameras tracking shoppers: the economics of retail video surveillance