Skip to main content
Top

2021 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

12. Innovation Trajectories: When to Open and Close the Innovation Process

Authors : Shantam Shukla, Shashwat Shukla

Published in: The Palgrave Handbook of Workplace Innovation

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Innovation as a source of competitive advantage helps the organization gain superior returns from the market. Until recently, innovation activities were generally restricted inside organizations and in some cases to select partners. The last two decades have witnessed the emergence of practices where private enterprises open all or select innovation activities for anyone with interest to participate. Referred to as “open innovation” approach to innovation development, organizations have shown different patterns of openness in their innovation efforts with regard to stages and levels of openness, identified as innovation trajectory in this study. In one of the first studies to explore openness at innovation process level, we explore the factors that determine the choice of innovation trajectory, i.e. pattern of openness, in the organization’s innovation process.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Mahindra challenges India to drive disruptive innovation. (2014). Mahindra and Mahindra. Retrieved from http://​www.​mahindra.​com/​News/​Press-Releases/​1393504217
 
Literature
go back to reference Adner, R. (2006). Match Your Innovation Strategy to Your Innovation Ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, 84(4), 98–107. Adner, R. (2006). Match Your Innovation Strategy to Your Innovation Ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, 84(4), 98–107.
go back to reference Afuah, A., & Tucci, C. L. (2012). Crowdsourcing as a Solution to Distant Search. Academy of Management Review, 37(3), 355–375.CrossRef Afuah, A., & Tucci, C. L. (2012). Crowdsourcing as a Solution to Distant Search. Academy of Management Review, 37(3), 355–375.CrossRef
go back to reference Allen, R. C. (1983). Collective Invention. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 4, 1–24.CrossRef Allen, R. C. (1983). Collective Invention. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 4, 1–24.CrossRef
go back to reference Ceccagnoli, M. (2009). Appropriability, preemption, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 81–98. Ceccagnoli, M. (2009). Appropriability, preemption, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 81–98.
go back to reference Chaharbaghi, K., Adcroft, A., Willis, R., Todeva, E., & Knoke, D. (2005). Strategic alliances and models of collaboration. Management decision. Chaharbaghi, K., Adcroft, A., Willis, R., Todeva, E., & Knoke, D. (2005). Strategic alliances and models of collaboration. Management decision.
go back to reference Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business Press. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
go back to reference Chiaroni, D., Chiesa, V., & Frattini, F. (2010). The Open Innovation Journey: How Firms Dynamically Implement the Emerging Innovation Management Paradigm. Technovation, 31(1), 34–43.CrossRef Chiaroni, D., Chiesa, V., & Frattini, F. (2010). The Open Innovation Journey: How Firms Dynamically Implement the Emerging Innovation Management Paradigm. Technovation, 31(1), 34–43.CrossRef
go back to reference Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.CrossRef Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.CrossRef
go back to reference Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2000). Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent (or not) (No. w7552). National Bureau of Economic Research. Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2000). Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent (or not) (No. w7552). National Bureau of Economic Research.
go back to reference Cooper, R. G. (2008). Perspective: The stage‐gate® idea‐to‐launch process—update, what’s new, and nexgen systems. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(3), 213–232. Cooper, R. G. (2008). Perspective: The stage‐gate® idea‐to‐launch process—update, what’s new, and nexgen systems. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(3), 213–232.
go back to reference Cyert, R. M., & March, I. G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Cyert, R. M., & March, I. G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
go back to reference Dahlander, L., & Frederiksen, L. (2011). The Core and Cosmopolitans: A Relational View of Innovation in User Communities. Organization Science, 23(4), 988–1007.CrossRef Dahlander, L., & Frederiksen, L. (2011). The Core and Cosmopolitans: A Relational View of Innovation in User Communities. Organization Science, 23(4), 988–1007.CrossRef
go back to reference Darke, P., Shanks, G., & Broadbent, M. (1998). Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism. Information Systems Journal, 8(4), 273–289. Darke, P., Shanks, G., & Broadbent, M. (1998). Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism. Information Systems Journal, 8(4), 273–289.
go back to reference De Faria, P., Lima, F., & Santos, R. (2010). Cooperation in innovation activities: The importance of partners. Research Policy, 39(8), 1082–1092. De Faria, P., Lima, F., & Santos, R. (2010). Cooperation in innovation activities: The importance of partners. Research Policy, 39(8), 1082–1092.
go back to reference Drechsler, W., & Natter, M. (2012). Understanding a Firm’s Openness Decisions in Innovation. Journal of Business Research, 65, 438–445.CrossRef Drechsler, W., & Natter, M. (2012). Understanding a Firm’s Openness Decisions in Innovation. Journal of Business Research, 65, 438–445.CrossRef
go back to reference Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1996). Resource-Based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms. Organization Science, 7(2), 136–150.CrossRef Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1996). Resource-Based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms. Organization Science, 7(2), 136–150.CrossRef
go back to reference Foray, D., & Perez, L. H. (2006). The economics of open technology: collective organization and individual claims in the ‘Fabrique Lyonnaise’during the old regime. New Frontiers in the Economics of Innovation and New Technology: Essays in Honour of Paul A. David, 239–54. Foray, D., & Perez, L. H. (2006). The economics of open technology: collective organization and individual claims in the ‘Fabrique Lyonnaise’during the old regime. New Frontiers in the Economics of Innovation and New Technology: Essays in Honour of Paul A. David, 239–54.
go back to reference Foray, D., Thoron, S., & Zimmermann, J.-B. (2007). Open software: knowledge openess and cooperation in cyberspace. In E. Brousseau & N. Curien (Eds.), Internet and digital economics: Principles, methods and applications (pp. 368–390). New York: Cambridge University Press. Foray, D., Thoron, S., & Zimmermann, J.-B. (2007). Open software: knowledge openess and cooperation in cyberspace. In E. Brousseau & N. Curien (Eds.), Internet and digital economics: Principles, methods and applications (pp. 368–390). New York: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 293–317. Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 293–317.
go back to reference Gupta, A. K. (1987). Scientific Perception of Farmers Innovations in Dry Regions: Barriers to the Scientific Curiosity (No. 699). Gupta, A. K. (1987). Scientific Perception of Farmers Innovations in Dry Regions: Barriers to the Scientific Curiosity (No. 699).
go back to reference Gupta, A. K. (1999). Securing Traditional Knowledge and Contemporary Innovations: Can Global Trade Links Help Grassroots Innovations? Honey Bee perspective. World Trade Forum. Gupta, A. K. (1999). Securing Traditional Knowledge and Contemporary Innovations: Can Global Trade Links Help Grassroots Innovations? Honey Bee perspective. World Trade Forum.
go back to reference Hagedorn, J., Linl, N. A., & Vorontas, S. N. (2000). Research Partnerships. Research Policy, 29, 567–586.CrossRef Hagedorn, J., Linl, N. A., & Vorontas, S. N. (2000). Research Partnerships. Research Policy, 29, 567–586.CrossRef
go back to reference Hansen, M. T., & Birkinshaw, J. (2007). The Innovation Value Chain. June: Harvard Business Review. Hansen, M. T., & Birkinshaw, J. (2007). The Innovation Value Chain. June: Harvard Business Review.
go back to reference Henkel, J. (2006). Selective Revealing in Open Innovation Processes: The Case of Embedded Linux. Research Policy, 35(7), 953–969.CrossRef Henkel, J. (2006). Selective Revealing in Open Innovation Processes: The Case of Embedded Linux. Research Policy, 35(7), 953–969.CrossRef
go back to reference Herzog, P. (2011). Open and Closed Innovation Different Cultures for Different Strategies. Springer. Herzog, P. (2011). Open and Closed Innovation Different Cultures for Different Strategies. Springer.
go back to reference Hippel, E. v. (1988). The Sources of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press. Hippel, E. v. (1988). The Sources of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Hughes, B., & Wareham, J. (2010). Knowledge Arbitrage in Global Pharma: A Synthetic View of Absorptive Capacity and Open Innovation. R&D Management, 40(3), 324–343.CrossRef Hughes, B., & Wareham, J. (2010). Knowledge Arbitrage in Global Pharma: A Synthetic View of Absorptive Capacity and Open Innovation. R&D Management, 40(3), 324–343.CrossRef
go back to reference Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). Strategy as Ecology. Harvard Business Review, 82(3), 68–78. Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). Strategy as Ecology. Harvard Business Review, 82(3), 68–78.
go back to reference Katz, R., & Allen, T. J. (1982). Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups. R&d Management, 12(1), 7–20. Katz, R., & Allen, T. J. (1982). Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups. R&d Management, 12(1), 7–20.
go back to reference Kessler, E. H., & Bierly, P. E. (2002). Is Faster Really Better? An Empirical Test of the Implications of Innovation Speed. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(1), 2–12.CrossRef Kessler, E. H., & Bierly, P. E. (2002). Is Faster Really Better? An Empirical Test of the Implications of Innovation Speed. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(1), 2–12.CrossRef
go back to reference Keupp, M. M., & Gassmann, O. (2009). Determinants and archetype users of open innovation. R&d Management, 39(4), 331–341. Keupp, M. M., & Gassmann, O. (2009). Determinants and archetype users of open innovation. R&d Management, 39(4), 331–341.
go back to reference King, A. A., & Lakhani, K. R. (2011). The Contingent Effect of Absorptive Capacity: An Open Innovation Analysis (No. 11–102). King, A. A., & Lakhani, K. R. (2011). The Contingent Effect of Absorptive Capacity: An Open Innovation Analysis (No. 11–102).
go back to reference Kirschbaum, R. (2005). Open Innovation in Practice. Research-Technology Management, 48(4), 24–28.CrossRef Kirschbaum, R. (2005). Open Innovation in Practice. Research-Technology Management, 48(4), 24–28.CrossRef
go back to reference Kline, S. J. (1985). Innovation is not a Linear Process. Research Management, 28(4), 36–45.CrossRef Kline, S. J. (1985). Innovation is not a Linear Process. Research Management, 28(4), 36–45.CrossRef
go back to reference Lakhani, K. R., Jeppesen, L. B., Lohse, P. A., & Panetta, J. A. (2007). The Value of Openess in Scientific Problem Solving (pp. 7–50). Boston, MA: Division of Research, Harvard Business School. Lakhani, K. R., Jeppesen, L. B., Lohse, P. A., & Panetta, J. A. (2007). The Value of Openess in Scientific Problem Solving (pp. 7–50). Boston, MA: Division of Research, Harvard Business School.
go back to reference Nohria, N., & Gulati, R. (1995). Is Slack Good or Bad for Innovation? The Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1245–1264. Nohria, N., & Gulati, R. (1995). Is Slack Good or Bad for Innovation? The Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1245–1264.
go back to reference Pettigrew, A., McKee, L., & Ferlie, E. (1988). Understanding Change in the NHS. Public Administration, 66(3), 297–317.CrossRef Pettigrew, A., McKee, L., & Ferlie, E. (1988). Understanding Change in the NHS. Public Administration, 66(3), 297–317.CrossRef
go back to reference Pisano, G. (1990). The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 153–176.CrossRef Pisano, G. (1990). The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 153–176.CrossRef
go back to reference Podolny, J. M. (1994). Market Uncertainty and the Social Character of Economic Exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3), 458–483.CrossRef Podolny, J. M. (1994). Market Uncertainty and the Social Character of Economic Exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3), 458–483.CrossRef
go back to reference Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press.
go back to reference Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.
go back to reference Rosenberg, N., & Nelson, R. R. (1994). American Univesities and Technical Advance in Industry. Research Policy, 23, 323–348. Rosenberg, N., & Nelson, R. R. (1994). American Univesities and Technical Advance in Industry. Research Policy, 23, 323–348.
go back to reference Rothaermel, F. T., & Alexandre, M. T. (2009). Ambidexterity in Technology Sourcing: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity. Organization Science, 20(4), 759–780.CrossRef Rothaermel, F. T., & Alexandre, M. T. (2009). Ambidexterity in Technology Sourcing: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity. Organization Science, 20(4), 759–780.CrossRef
go back to reference Rothwell R., & Zegveld. (1985). Reindustrialization and Technology. Harlow, U.K.: Longman. Rothwell R., & Zegveld. (1985). Reindustrialization and Technology. Harlow, U.K.: Longman.
go back to reference Salter, A., ter Wal, A., Criscuolo, P., & Alexy, O. (2012). Open for Ideation: Individual-level Openness and Idea Generation in R & D. DRUID 2012 on June 19 to June 21 at CBS, Copenhagen, Denmark. Salter, A., ter Wal, A., Criscuolo, P., & Alexy, O. (2012). Open for Ideation: Individual-level Openness and Idea Generation in R & D. DRUID 2012 on June 19 to June 21 at CBS, Copenhagen, Denmark.
go back to reference Singh, J. V. (1986). Performance, Slack and Risk-Taking in Organizational Decision Making. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 562–585.CrossRef Singh, J. V. (1986). Performance, Slack and Risk-Taking in Organizational Decision Making. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 562–585.CrossRef
go back to reference Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from Technological Innovation. Research Policy, 15(6), 285–305.CrossRef Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from Technological Innovation. Research Policy, 15(6), 285–305.CrossRef
go back to reference Tushman, M. L. (1977). Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(4), 587–605. Tushman, M. L. (1977). Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(4), 587–605.
go back to reference Van der Meer, H. (2007). Open innovation–the Dutch treat: challenges in thinking in business models. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(2), 192–202. Van der Meer, H. (2007). Open innovation–the Dutch treat: challenges in thinking in business models. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(2), 192–202.
go back to reference West, J. (2003). How Open is Open Enough? Melding Proprietary and Open Source Platform Strategies. Research Policy, 32, 1259–1285.CrossRef West, J. (2003). How Open is Open Enough? Melding Proprietary and Open Source Platform Strategies. Research Policy, 32, 1259–1285.CrossRef
go back to reference West, J., & Bogers, M. (2014). Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4). West, J., & Bogers, M. (2014). Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4).
go back to reference Zaltman, G., Duncan, R., & Holbeck, J. (1973). Innovation and Organisations. New York: Wiley. Zaltman, G., Duncan, R., & Holbeck, J. (1973). Innovation and Organisations. New York: Wiley.
Metadata
Title
Innovation Trajectories: When to Open and Close the Innovation Process
Authors
Shantam Shukla
Shashwat Shukla
Copyright Year
2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59916-4_12

Premium Partner