Skip to main content
Register
Springer Professional
SEARCH
Menu 1 2 3 4
Top

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the chapters of this book

Published in:
Electric, Hybrid, and Fuel Cell Vehicles: Introduction Read chapter Read first chapter

2021 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Life-Cycle Analysis of Vehicle Lightweighting: A Review

Authors : Jarod C. Kelly, Qiang Dai

Published in: Electric, Hybrid, and Fuel Cell Vehicles

Publisher: Springer New York

Login to get access
share
SHARE

Excerpt

AHSS
Advanced high-strength steel
BEVs
Battery electric vehicles
CAFE
Corporate Average Fuel Economy
CFRP
Carbon fiber reinforced plastic
CO2
Carbon dioxide
DOE
US Department of Energy
EPA
US Environmental Protection Agency
FRVs
Fuel reduction values
GFRP
Glass fiber reinforced plastic
GHGs
Greenhouse gas emissions
GREET®
Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Transportation
HEVs
Hybrid electric vehicles
HSS
High-strength steel
ICEVs
Internal combustion engine vehicles
LCA
Life-cycle analysis
MMLV
Multi Material Lightweight Vehicle
MYs
Model years
NHTSA
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
NOx
Oxides of nitrogen
OEMs
Original equipment manufacturers
PHEVs
Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles
SOx
Sulfur oxides
SUVs
Sports utility vehicles
…

To get access to this content you need the following product:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 69.000 Bücher
  • über 500 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt 90 Tage mit der neuen Mini-Lizenz testen!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 50.000 Bücher
  • über 380 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe



 


Jetzt 90 Tage mit der neuen Mini-Lizenz testen!

inform now
previous chapter Vehicle Dynamics and Performance
next chapter Vehicle Biofuels
Literature
1.
Steffen W et al (1998) The terrestrial carbon cycle: implications for the Kyoto protocol. Science 280(5368):1393–1394 CrossRef
2.
O’Neill BC, Oppenheimer M (2002) Climate change: dangerous climate impacts and the Kyoto protocol. Science 296(5575):1971–1972 CrossRef
3.
Susan S (2007) Climate change 2007-the physical science basis: working group I contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC, vol 4. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
4.
Ford JD, Berrang-Ford L, Paterson J (2011) A systematic review of observed climate change adaptation in developed nations. Clim Chang 106(2):327–336 CrossRef
5.
IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis: working group I contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
6.
Mashayekh Y et al (2012) Potentials for sustainable transportation in cities to alleviate climate change impacts. Environ Sci Technol 46(5):2529–2537 CrossRef
7.
Davis SC, Diegel SW, Boundy RG (2014 Transportation energy data book: edition 33. ORNL-6990, Oak Ridge National Laboratory: Knoxville
8.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2010) EPA and NHTSA finalize historic national program to reduce greenhouse gases and improve fuel economy for cars and trucks. EPA-420-F-10-014, U.S. EPA: Washington
9.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2012) 2017 and later model year light-duty vehicle greenhouse gas emissions and corporate average fuel economy standards U.S. EPA; U.S. NHTSA: Washington, DC
10.
US EPA and NHTSA. The safer affordable fuel-efficient (SAFE) Vehicles Rule for Model Years 2021–2026 Passenger cars and light trucks. Proposed Rule NHTSA-2018-0067; EPA-HQ-OAR-2018– 0283; FRL-9981-74-OAR
11.
Davis SC, Boundy RG (2018) Transportation energy data book: edition 37. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge
12.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2014) Light duty automotive technology, carbon dioxide emissions, and fuel economy trends: 1975–2014. EPA-420-R-14-023
13.
14.
Singh H (2012) Mass reduction for light-duty vehicles for model years 2017–2025. Report No DOT HS 811 666
15.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2012) Light-duty vehicle mass reduction and cost analysis – midsize crossover utility vehicle. EPA-420-R-12-026
16.
17.
18.
Kirchain Jr RE, Gregory JR, Olivetti EA (2017) Environmental life-cycle assessment. Nat Mater 16(7):693 CrossRef
19.
Sullivan JL, Hu J (1995) Life cycle energy analysis for automobiles. SAE technical paper, 951829
20.
Stodolsky F, Vyas A, Cuenca R, Gaines L (1995) Life-cycle energy savings potential from aluminum-intensive vehicles. SAE Technical Paper
21.
EPA and NHTSA (2010) Light-duty vehicle greenhouse gas emission standards and corporate average fuel economy standards; final rule. Fed Regist 40:25323–25728
22.
EPA and NHTSA (2012) 2017 and later model year light-duty vehicle greenhouse gas emissions and corporate average fuel economy standards; final rule. Fed Regist 77(199):62623–63200
23.
Kobayashi O (1997) Car life cycle inventory assessment. SAE technical paper, 971199
24.
Schuckert M, Beddies H, Gediga J, Florin H, Eyerer P, Schweimer GW (1997) Life cycle inventories-new experiences to save Environmental loads and costs. SAE technical paper, 971171
25.
Keoleian GA, Spatari S, Beal RT, Stephens RD, Williams RL (1998) Application of life cycle inventory analysis to fuel tank system design. Int J Life Cycle Assess 3(1):18–28 CrossRef
26.
Das S (2000) The life-cycle impacts of aluminum body-in-white automotive material. JOM 52(8):41–44 CrossRef
27.
Schmidt W-P et al (2004) Life cycle assessment of lightweight and end-of-life scenarios for generic compact class passenger vehicles. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9(6):405–416 CrossRef
28.
Cheah LW (2010) Cars on a diet: the material and energy impacts of passenger vehicle weight reduction in the US. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
29.
Kim H-J, McMillan C, Keoleian GA, Skerlos SJ (2010) Greenhouse gas emissions payback for lightweighted vehicles using aluminum and high-strength steel. J Ind Ecol 14(6):929–946 CrossRef
30.
Koffler C, Rohde-Brandenburger K (2010) On the calculation of fuel savings through lightweight design in automotive life cycle assessments. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(1):128–135 CrossRef
31.
Modaresi R, Pauliuk S, Løvik AN, Müller DB (2014) Global carbon benefits of material substitution in passenger cars until 2050 and the impact on the steel and aluminum industries. Environ Sci Technol 48(18):10776–10784 CrossRef
32.
Kelly JC, Sullivan JL, Burnham A, Elgowainy A (2015) Impacts of vehicle weight reduction via material substitution on life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions. Environ Sci Technol 49(20):12535–12542 CrossRef
33.
Luk JM, Saville BA, MacLean HL (2016) Vehicle attribute trade-offs to meet the 2025 CAFE fuel economy target. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 49:154–171 CrossRef
34.
Lewis AM, Kelly JC, Keoleian GA (2012) Evaluating the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from a lightweight plug-in hybrid electric vehicle in a regional context. In: Sustainable systems and technology (ISSST), 2012 IEEE international symposium on, pp 1–6
35.
Kim HC, Wallington TJ (2013) Life cycle assessment of vehicle lightweighting: a physics-based model of mass-induced fuel consumption. Environ Sci Technol 47(24):14358–14366 CrossRef
36.
WorldAutoSteel (2011) FutureSteelVehicle overview report. WorldAutoSteel
37.
Luk JM, Kim HC, De Kleine RD, Wallington TJ, MacLean HL (2018) Greenhouse gas emission benefits of vehicle lightweighting: Monte Carlo probabilistic analysis of the multi material lightweight vehicle glider. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 62:1–10 CrossRef
38.
Reynolds C, Kandlikar M (2007) How hybrid-electric vehicles are different from conventional vehicles: the effect of weight and power on fuel consumption. Environ Res Lett 2(1):014003 CrossRef
39.
Lewis AM, Kelly JC, Keoleian GA (2014) Vehicle lightweighting vs. electrification: life cycle energy and GHG emissions results for diverse powertrain vehicles. Appl Energy 126:13–20 CrossRef
40.
Lewis AM, Keoleian G, Kelly J (2014) The potential of lightweight materials and advanced combustion engines to reduce life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emissions. SAE technical paper
41.
Luk JM, Kim HC, De Kleine R, Wallington TJ, MacLean HL (2017) Impact of powertrain type on potential life cycle greenhouse gas emission reductions from a real world lightweight glider. SAE technical paper
42.
Bushi L, Skszek T, Wagner D (2015) MMLV: life cycle assessment. SAE technical paper
43.
Bushi L (2018) EDAG Silverado body Lightweighting final LCA report. Aluminum Association
44.
US EPA (2018) Light-duty automotive technology, carbon dioxide emissions, and fuel economy trends: 1975 Through 2017. EPA-420-R-18-001
45.
Keoleian GA, Sullivan JL (2012) Materials challenges and opportunities for enhancing the sustainability of automobiles. MRS Bull 37(04):365–373 CrossRef
46.
Luk JM, Kim HC, De Kleine R, Wallington TJ, MacLean HL (2017) Review of the fuel saving, life cycle GHG emission, and ownership cost impacts of lightweighting vehicles with different powertrains. Environ Sci Technol 51(15):8215–8228 CrossRef
47.
Kim HC, Wallington TJ, Sullivan JL, Keoleian GA (2015) Life cycle assessment of vehicle lightweighting: novel mathematical methods to estimate use-phase fuel consumption. Environ Sci Technol 49(16):10209–10216 CrossRef
48.
49.
WorldAutoSteel representative, “Personal discussion,” 13-Jun-2014
50.
51.
Sperle J-O, Hallberg L, Larsson J, Groth H, Östman K, Larsson J (2013) The environmental value of high strength steel structures. Steel Eco-Cycle
52.
Frischknecht R (2010) LCI modelling approaches applied on recycling of materials in view of environmental sustainability, risk perception and eco-efficiency. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(7):666–671 CrossRef
53.
Kim HC, Wallington TJ (2013) Life-cycle energy and greenhouse gas emission benefits of lightweighting in automobiles: review and harmonization. Environ Sci Technol 47(12):6089–6097 CrossRef
54.
U.S. Department of Energy (2013) Light-duty vehicles technical requirements and gaps for lightweight and propulsion materials. U.S. Department of Energy, Vehicle Technologies Office, Workshop Report
55.
Malen DE (2011) Fundamentals of automobile body structure design. SAE International, Warrendale CrossRef
56.
Geyer R (2008) Parametric assessment of climate change impacts of automotive material substitution. Environ Sci Technol 42(18):6973–6979 CrossRef
57.
Elgowainy A, Jeongwoo H, Jacob W, Fred J, David G, Alicia L, Todd R, et al. (2016) Cradle-to-grave lifecycle analysis of US light duty vehicle-fuel pathways: a greenhouse gas emissions and economic assessment of current (2015) and future (2025–2030) technologies. Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL
Metadata
Title
Life-Cycle Analysis of Vehicle Lightweighting: A Review
Authors
Jarod C. Kelly
Qiang Dai
Copyright Year
2021
Publisher
Springer New York
Book
Electric, Hybrid, and Fuel Cell Vehicles

Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-1491-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-1-0716-1492-1

Copyright Year: 2021

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1492-1_1080

Premium Partner

AVL List GmbH dSpace BorgWarner Smalley FEV Ansys Valeo
    Image Credits