Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Quality & Quantity 5/2017

01-07-2016

Managing the front-end phase of process innovation under conditions of high uncertainty

Authors: Vinit Parida, Pankaj C. Patel, Johan Frishammar, Joakim Wincent

Published in: Quality & Quantity | Issue 5/2017

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Using a fuzzy-set qualitative comparison analysis, we identify and examine key conditions for success in early front-end phases of process innovation projects. We focus on the very initial stage of the innovation process—the front-end phase—and a selection of conditions for managing highly uncertain process innovation projects. In high-uncertainty projects coupled with high levels of equivocality, formalizing roles and processes should be consistently avoided; however, idea screening is beneficial. Moreover, in successful innovation projects formalized processes but not formalized roles are beneficial. The findings suggest that formalizing roles and processes, a success factor in prior studies of innovation, does not result in success of process innovation projects.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Amburgey, T.L., Miner, A.S.: Strategic momentum: the effects of repetitive, positional, and contextual momentum on merger activity. Strat. Manag. J. 13, 335–348 (1992)CrossRef Amburgey, T.L., Miner, A.S.: Strategic momentum: the effects of repetitive, positional, and contextual momentum on merger activity. Strat. Manag. J. 13, 335–348 (1992)CrossRef
go back to reference Anderson, P., Tushman, M.L.: Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: a cyclical model of technological change. Adm. Sci. Quart. 35(4), 604–633 (1990)CrossRef Anderson, P., Tushman, M.L.: Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: a cyclical model of technological change. Adm. Sci. Quart. 35(4), 604–633 (1990)CrossRef
go back to reference Baer, M., Frese, M.: Innovation is not enough: climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. J. Org. Behav. 24(1), 45–68 (2003)CrossRef Baer, M., Frese, M.: Innovation is not enough: climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. J. Org. Behav. 24(1), 45–68 (2003)CrossRef
go back to reference Boeddrich, H.J.: Ideas in the workplace: a new approach towards organizing the fuzzy front end of the innovation process. Creat. Innov. Manag. 13(4), 274–285 (2004)CrossRef Boeddrich, H.J.: Ideas in the workplace: a new approach towards organizing the fuzzy front end of the innovation process. Creat. Innov. Manag. 13(4), 274–285 (2004)CrossRef
go back to reference Brentani, U.: Innovative versus incremental new business services: different keys for achieving success. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 18(3), 169–187 (2001)CrossRef Brentani, U.: Innovative versus incremental new business services: different keys for achieving success. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 18(3), 169–187 (2001)CrossRef
go back to reference Bstieler, L., Hemmert, M.: Increasing learning and time efficiency in interorganizational new product development teams. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 27(4), 485–499 (2010)CrossRef Bstieler, L., Hemmert, M.: Increasing learning and time efficiency in interorganizational new product development teams. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 27(4), 485–499 (2010)CrossRef
go back to reference Chesbrough, H.: Managing open innovation. Res. Technol. Manag. 47(1), 23 (2004) Chesbrough, H.: Managing open innovation. Res. Technol. Manag. 47(1), 23 (2004)
go back to reference Chesbrough, H.W.: Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press, Boston (2006) Chesbrough, H.W.: Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press, Boston (2006)
go back to reference Conway, H.A., McGuinness, N.W.: Idea generation in technology-based firms. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 3(4), 276–291 (1986)CrossRef Conway, H.A., McGuinness, N.W.: Idea generation in technology-based firms. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 3(4), 276–291 (1986)CrossRef
go back to reference Cooper, R.G.: Predevelopment activities determine new product success. Ind. Mark. Manag. 17(3), 237–247 (1988)CrossRef Cooper, R.G.: Predevelopment activities determine new product success. Ind. Mark. Manag. 17(3), 237–247 (1988)CrossRef
go back to reference Cooper, R.G., Kleinschmidt, E.J.: New products: what separates winners from losers? J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 4(3), 169–184 (1987)CrossRef Cooper, R.G., Kleinschmidt, E.J.: New products: what separates winners from losers? J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 4(3), 169–184 (1987)CrossRef
go back to reference Cooper, R.G.: Perspective: the stage-gate® idea-to-launch process—Update, what’s new, and Nexgen systems. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 25(3), 213–232 (2008)CrossRef Cooper, R.G.: Perspective: the stage-gate® idea-to-launch process—Update, what’s new, and Nexgen systems. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 25(3), 213–232 (2008)CrossRef
go back to reference Daft, R.L., Lengel, R.H.: Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Manag. Sci. 32(5), 554–571 (1986)CrossRef Daft, R.L., Lengel, R.H.: Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Manag. Sci. 32(5), 554–571 (1986)CrossRef
go back to reference Daft, R.L., Weick, K.E.: Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Acad. Manage. Rev. 9(2), 284–295 (1984) Daft, R.L., Weick, K.E.: Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Acad. Manage. Rev. 9(2), 284–295 (1984)
go back to reference Eng, S., Woodside, A.G.: Configural analysis of the drinking man: fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analyses. Addict. Behav. 37(4), 541–543 (2012)CrossRef Eng, S., Woodside, A.G.: Configural analysis of the drinking man: fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analyses. Addict. Behav. 37(4), 541–543 (2012)CrossRef
go back to reference Ennen, E., Richter, A.: The whole is more than the sum of its parts—or is it? a review of the empirical literature on complementarities in organizations. J. Manag. 36(1), 207–233 (2010) Ennen, E., Richter, A.: The whole is more than the sum of its parts—or is it? a review of the empirical literature on complementarities in organizations. J. Manag. 36(1), 207–233 (2010)
go back to reference Ettlie, J.E., Reza, E.M.: Organizational integration and process innovation. Acad. Manag. J. 35, 795–827 (1992)CrossRef Ettlie, J.E., Reza, E.M.: Organizational integration and process innovation. Acad. Manag. J. 35, 795–827 (1992)CrossRef
go back to reference Fiss, P.C.: Building better causal theories: a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Acad. Manag. J. 54(2), 393–420 (2011)CrossRef Fiss, P.C.: Building better causal theories: a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Acad. Manag. J. 54(2), 393–420 (2011)CrossRef
go back to reference Florén, H., Frishammar, J.: From preliminary ideas to corroborated product definitions. Calif. Manag. Rev. 54(4), 20–43 (2012)CrossRef Florén, H., Frishammar, J.: From preliminary ideas to corroborated product definitions. Calif. Manag. Rev. 54(4), 20–43 (2012)CrossRef
go back to reference Frishammar, J., Florén, H., Wincent, J.: Beyond managing uncertainty: insights from studying equivocality in the fuzzy front end of product and process innovation projects. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 58(3), 551–563 (2011)CrossRef Frishammar, J., Florén, H., Wincent, J.: Beyond managing uncertainty: insights from studying equivocality in the fuzzy front end of product and process innovation projects. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 58(3), 551–563 (2011)CrossRef
go back to reference Frishammar, J., Kurkkio, M., Abrahamsson, L., Lichtenthaler, U.: Antecedents and consequences of firms’ process innovation capability: a literature review and a conceptual framework. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 59(4), 519–529 (2012)CrossRef Frishammar, J., Kurkkio, M., Abrahamsson, L., Lichtenthaler, U.: Antecedents and consequences of firms’ process innovation capability: a literature review and a conceptual framework. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 59(4), 519–529 (2012)CrossRef
go back to reference Frishammar, J., Lichtenthaler, U., Richtnér, A.: Managing process development: key issues and dimensions in the front end. R&D Manag. 43(3), 213–226 (2013)CrossRef Frishammar, J., Lichtenthaler, U., Richtnér, A.: Managing process development: key issues and dimensions in the front end. R&D Manag. 43(3), 213–226 (2013)CrossRef
go back to reference Galbraith, J.K., Buck, B.: The age of uncertainty. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1977) Galbraith, J.K., Buck, B.: The age of uncertainty. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1977)
go back to reference Gilbert, C.G.: Unbundling the structure of inertia: resource versus routine rigidity. Acad. Manag. J. 48, 741–763 (2005)CrossRef Gilbert, C.G.: Unbundling the structure of inertia: resource versus routine rigidity. Acad. Manag. J. 48, 741–763 (2005)CrossRef
go back to reference Goldenberg, J., Lehmann, D.R., Mazursky, D.: The idea itself and the circumstances of its emergence as predictors of new product success. Manag. Sci. 47(1), 69–84 (2001)CrossRef Goldenberg, J., Lehmann, D.R., Mazursky, D.: The idea itself and the circumstances of its emergence as predictors of new product success. Manag. Sci. 47(1), 69–84 (2001)CrossRef
go back to reference Gopalakrishnan, S., Damanpour, F.: Patterns of generation and adoption of innovation in organizations: contingency models of innovation attributes. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 11(2), 95–116 (1994)CrossRef Gopalakrishnan, S., Damanpour, F.: Patterns of generation and adoption of innovation in organizations: contingency models of innovation attributes. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 11(2), 95–116 (1994)CrossRef
go back to reference Gopalakrishnan, S., Bierly, P., Kessler, E.H.: A reexamination of product and process innovations using a knowledge-based view. J. High Technol. Manag. Res. 10(1), 147–166 (1999)CrossRef Gopalakrishnan, S., Bierly, P., Kessler, E.H.: A reexamination of product and process innovations using a knowledge-based view. J. High Technol. Manag. Res. 10(1), 147–166 (1999)CrossRef
go back to reference Greco, M., Grimaldi, M., Cricelli, L.: Open innovation actions and innovation performance: a literature review of European empirical evidence. Euro. J. Innov. Manag. 18, 150–171 (2015)CrossRef Greco, M., Grimaldi, M., Cricelli, L.: Open innovation actions and innovation performance: a literature review of European empirical evidence. Euro. J. Innov. Manag. 18, 150–171 (2015)CrossRef
go back to reference Griffiths-Hemans, J., Grover, R.: Setting the stage for creative new products: investigating the idea fruition process. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 34(1), 27–39 (2006)CrossRef Griffiths-Hemans, J., Grover, R.: Setting the stage for creative new products: investigating the idea fruition process. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 34(1), 27–39 (2006)CrossRef
go back to reference Hannan, M.T., Pólos, L., Carroll, G.: Structural inertia and organizational change revisited: architecture, culture and cascading change. I. Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, California (2002) Hannan, M.T., Pólos, L., Carroll, G.: Structural inertia and organizational change revisited: architecture, culture and cascading change. I. Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, California (2002)
go back to reference Hendricks, K.B., Singhal, V.R.: Firm characteristics, total quality management, and financial performance. J. Op. manag. 19(3), 269–285 (2001)CrossRef Hendricks, K.B., Singhal, V.R.: Firm characteristics, total quality management, and financial performance. J. Op. manag. 19(3), 269–285 (2001)CrossRef
go back to reference Hervas-Oliver, J.L., Sempere-Ripoll, F., Boronat-Moll, C.: Process innovation strategy in SMEs, organizational innovation and performance: a misleading debate? Small Bus. Econ. 43, 873–886 (2014)CrossRef Hervas-Oliver, J.L., Sempere-Ripoll, F., Boronat-Moll, C.: Process innovation strategy in SMEs, organizational innovation and performance: a misleading debate? Small Bus. Econ. 43, 873–886 (2014)CrossRef
go back to reference Ittner, C.D., Larcker, D.F.: The performance effects of process management techniques. Manag. Sci. 43(4), 522–534 (1997)CrossRef Ittner, C.D., Larcker, D.F.: The performance effects of process management techniques. Manag. Sci. 43(4), 522–534 (1997)CrossRef
go back to reference Kim, J., Wilemon, D.: Strategic issues in managing innovation’s fuzzy front-end. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 5(1), 27–39 (2002)CrossRef Kim, J., Wilemon, D.: Strategic issues in managing innovation’s fuzzy front-end. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 5(1), 27–39 (2002)CrossRef
go back to reference Khurana, A., Rosenthal, S.R.: Integrating the fuzzy front end of new product development. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 38(2), 103–120 (1997) Khurana, A., Rosenthal, S.R.: Integrating the fuzzy front end of new product development. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 38(2), 103–120 (1997)
go back to reference Khurana, A., Rosenthal, S.R.: Towards holistic “front ends” in new product development. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 15(1), 57–74 (1998)CrossRef Khurana, A., Rosenthal, S.R.: Towards holistic “front ends” in new product development. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 15(1), 57–74 (1998)CrossRef
go back to reference Kurkkio, M., Frishammar, J., Lichtenthaler, U.: Where process development begins: a multiple case study of front end activities in process firms. Technovation 31(9), 490–504 (2011)CrossRef Kurkkio, M., Frishammar, J., Lichtenthaler, U.: Where process development begins: a multiple case study of front end activities in process firms. Technovation 31(9), 490–504 (2011)CrossRef
go back to reference Lager, T.: A new conceptual model for the development of process technology in process industry. Int. J. Inno. Manag. 4(3), 319–346 (2000) Lager, T.: A new conceptual model for the development of process technology in process industry. Int. J. Inno. Manag. 4(3), 319–346 (2000)
go back to reference Lager, T.: Product and process development intensity in process industry: a conceptual and empirical analysis of the allocation of company resources for the development of process technology. Int. J. Innov. Manag. 6(02), 105–130 (2002)CrossRef Lager, T.: Product and process development intensity in process industry: a conceptual and empirical analysis of the allocation of company resources for the development of process technology. Int. J. Innov. Manag. 6(02), 105–130 (2002)CrossRef
go back to reference Lager, T., Blanco, S., Frishammar, J.: Managing R&D and innovation in the process industries. R&D Manag. 43(3), 189–195 (2013)CrossRef Lager, T., Blanco, S., Frishammar, J.: Managing R&D and innovation in the process industries. R&D Manag. 43(3), 189–195 (2013)CrossRef
go back to reference Linton, J.D.: The role of relationships and reciprocity in the implementation of process innovation. Eng. Manag. J. 12(3), 34–38 (2000)CrossRef Linton, J.D.: The role of relationships and reciprocity in the implementation of process innovation. Eng. Manag. J. 12(3), 34–38 (2000)CrossRef
go back to reference Linton, J.D., Walsh, S.T.: A theory of innovation for process-based innovations such as nanotechnology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Ch. 75(5), 583–594 (2008)CrossRef Linton, J.D., Walsh, S.T.: A theory of innovation for process-based innovations such as nanotechnology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Ch. 75(5), 583–594 (2008)CrossRef
go back to reference Lim, L.P., Garnsey, E., Gregory, M.: Product and process innovation in biopharmaceuticals: a new perspective on development. R&D Manag. 36(1), 27–36 (2006)CrossRef Lim, L.P., Garnsey, E., Gregory, M.: Product and process innovation in biopharmaceuticals: a new perspective on development. R&D Manag. 36(1), 27–36 (2006)CrossRef
go back to reference Lin, T.T.: Assessment of decision-making regarding market entry/exit for technology innovation. Qual. Quant. 44(3), 447–457 (2010)CrossRef Lin, T.T.: Assessment of decision-making regarding market entry/exit for technology innovation. Qual. Quant. 44(3), 447–457 (2010)CrossRef
go back to reference McEvily, B., Marcus, A.: Embedded ties and the acquisition of competitive capabilities. Strat. Manag. J. 26(11), 1033–1055 (2005)CrossRef McEvily, B., Marcus, A.: Embedded ties and the acquisition of competitive capabilities. Strat. Manag. J. 26(11), 1033–1055 (2005)CrossRef
go back to reference Murphy, S.A., Kumar, V.: The front end of new product development: a Canadian survey. R&D Manag. 27(1), 5–15 (1997)CrossRef Murphy, S.A., Kumar, V.: The front end of new product development: a Canadian survey. R&D Manag. 27(1), 5–15 (1997)CrossRef
go back to reference Naghizadeh, R., Elahi, S., Manteghi, M., Ghazinoory, S., Ranga, M.: Through the magnifying glass: an analysis of regional innovation models based on co-word and meta-synthesis methods. Qual. Quant. 49(6), 2481–2505 (2015)CrossRef Naghizadeh, R., Elahi, S., Manteghi, M., Ghazinoory, S., Ranga, M.: Through the magnifying glass: an analysis of regional innovation models based on co-word and meta-synthesis methods. Qual. Quant. 49(6), 2481–2505 (2015)CrossRef
go back to reference Naqshbandi, M.M., Kaur, S., Ma, P.: What organizational culture types enable and retard open innovation? Qual. Quant. 49(5), 2123–2144 (2015)CrossRef Naqshbandi, M.M., Kaur, S., Ma, P.: What organizational culture types enable and retard open innovation? Qual. Quant. 49(5), 2123–2144 (2015)CrossRef
go back to reference Pisano, G.P.: The development factory: unlocking the potential of process innovation. Harvard Business Press, Boston (1997) Pisano, G.P.: The development factory: unlocking the potential of process innovation. Harvard Business Press, Boston (1997)
go back to reference Ragin, C.C.: Fuzzy-set social science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2000) Ragin, C.C.: Fuzzy-set social science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2000)
go back to reference Ragin, C.C.: Redesigning social inquiry: fuzzy sets and beyond (vol. 240). University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2008)CrossRef Ragin, C.C.: Redesigning social inquiry: fuzzy sets and beyond (vol. 240). University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2008)CrossRef
go back to reference Rizzo, J.R., House, R.J., Lirtzman, S.I.: Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Adm. Sci. Quart. 15, 150–163 (1970)CrossRef Rizzo, J.R., House, R.J., Lirtzman, S.I.: Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Adm. Sci. Quart. 15, 150–163 (1970)CrossRef
go back to reference Robertson, P.L., Casali, G.L., Jacobson, D.: Managing open incremental process innovation: absorptive capacity and distributed learning. Res. Policy 41(5), 822–832 (2012)CrossRef Robertson, P.L., Casali, G.L., Jacobson, D.: Managing open incremental process innovation: absorptive capacity and distributed learning. Res. Policy 41(5), 822–832 (2012)CrossRef
go back to reference Sjödin, D.R., Frishammar, J., Eriksson, P.E.: Managing uncertainty and equivocality in joint process development projects. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 39, 13–25 (2016)CrossRef Sjödin, D.R., Frishammar, J., Eriksson, P.E.: Managing uncertainty and equivocality in joint process development projects. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 39, 13–25 (2016)CrossRef
go back to reference Sine, W.D., Mitsuhashi, H., Kirsch, D.A.: Revisiting burns and stalker: formal structure and new venture performance in emerging economic sectors. Acad. Manag. J. 49(1), 121–132 (2006)CrossRef Sine, W.D., Mitsuhashi, H., Kirsch, D.A.: Revisiting burns and stalker: formal structure and new venture performance in emerging economic sectors. Acad. Manag. J. 49(1), 121–132 (2006)CrossRef
go back to reference Teece, D.J.: Dynamic capabilities and strategic management: organizing for innovation and growth. OUP, Oxford (2009) Teece, D.J.: Dynamic capabilities and strategic management: organizing for innovation and growth. OUP, Oxford (2009)
go back to reference Thomas, J.B., McDaniel, R.R.: Interpreting strategic issues: effects of strategy and the information-processing structure of top management teams. Acad. Manag. J. 33(2), 286–306 (1990)CrossRef Thomas, J.B., McDaniel, R.R.: Interpreting strategic issues: effects of strategy and the information-processing structure of top management teams. Acad. Manag. J. 33(2), 286–306 (1990)CrossRef
go back to reference Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychol. 5, 207–232 (1973)CrossRef Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychol. 5, 207–232 (1973)CrossRef
go back to reference Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185, 1124–1131 (1974)CrossRef Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185, 1124–1131 (1974)CrossRef
go back to reference Utterback, J., Abernathy, W.: A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega 3, 639–656 (1975)CrossRef Utterback, J., Abernathy, W.: A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega 3, 639–656 (1975)CrossRef
go back to reference Uzzi, B.: Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Adm. Sci. Quart. 42(1), 35–67 (1997)CrossRef Uzzi, B.: Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Adm. Sci. Quart. 42(1), 35–67 (1997)CrossRef
go back to reference Weick, K.E.: Cognitive processes in organizations. Res. Org. Behav. 1(1), 41–74 (1979) Weick, K.E.: Cognitive processes in organizations. Res. Org. Behav. 1(1), 41–74 (1979)
go back to reference Woodside, A.G.: Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory. J. Bus. Res. 66(4), 463–472 (2013)CrossRef Woodside, A.G.: Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory. J. Bus. Res. 66(4), 463–472 (2013)CrossRef
go back to reference Yu, D., Hang, C.C.: A reflective review of disruptive innovation theory. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 12(4), 435–452 (2010)CrossRef Yu, D., Hang, C.C.: A reflective review of disruptive innovation theory. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 12(4), 435–452 (2010)CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Managing the front-end phase of process innovation under conditions of high uncertainty
Authors
Vinit Parida
Pankaj C. Patel
Johan Frishammar
Joakim Wincent
Publication date
01-07-2016
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Quality & Quantity / Issue 5/2017
Print ISSN: 0033-5177
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7845
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0376-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2017

Quality & Quantity 5/2017 Go to the issue