Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Quality & Quantity 5/2014

01-09-2014

Methods for analyzing decision-making: a framework approach

Authors: Jon Nyhlén, Gustav Lidén

Published in: Quality & Quantity | Issue 5/2014

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In political science an eternal question concerns how decisions and policies arise. Modern society, characterized by more uncertainty and complexity than before, increases the challenge of providing valid answers. However, the general lack of methodological concern in several previous studies in this area stresses the need for elaborations of more suitable approaches. In this article we add a methodological perspective that deals with this very question. By reviewing and analyzing earlier research on how decision-making is reached, the overall ambition of this article is to create a framework that can lay the methodological foundation for further studies. Such a framework, which takes into account both the complexity of modern multi-governance societies and adds methodological perspectives of macro and micro standpoints as well as of causal mechanisms, can be used in future research to achieve richer pictures of how decision-making is carried out. In addition, we show how a certain technique of analysis is highly compatible to this framework and that jointly these features provide solutions for a better understanding of the complexity of modern decision-making. All in all, applying this strategy can be used to better systematize complex causal chains that reflect different analytical levels and thereby increase leverage on how to understand and explain the process of political decisions.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Beach, D., Pedersen, R.B.: Process-Tracing Methods?: Foundations and Guidelines. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (2013) Beach, D., Pedersen, R.B.: Process-Tracing Methods?: Foundations and Guidelines. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (2013)
go back to reference Beck, N.: Causal process “observation”: oxymoron or (fine) old wine. Political Anal. 18, 499–505 (2010)CrossRef Beck, N.: Causal process “observation”: oxymoron or (fine) old wine. Political Anal. 18, 499–505 (2010)CrossRef
go back to reference Brady, H.E.: Toward a pluralistic vision of methodology. Political Anal. 14, 353–368 (2006)CrossRef Brady, H.E.: Toward a pluralistic vision of methodology. Political Anal. 14, 353–368 (2006)CrossRef
go back to reference Brady, H.E., Collier, D. (eds.): Rethinking Social Inquiry?: Diverse Tools. Shared Standards. Rowman & Rowman, Lanham (2004) Brady, H.E., Collier, D. (eds.): Rethinking Social Inquiry?: Diverse Tools. Shared Standards. Rowman & Rowman, Lanham (2004)
go back to reference Cohen, M.D., March, J.G., Olsen, J.P.: A garbage can model of organizational choice. Adm. Sci. Q. 17, 1–25 (1972)CrossRef Cohen, M.D., March, J.G., Olsen, J.P.: A garbage can model of organizational choice. Adm. Sci. Q. 17, 1–25 (1972)CrossRef
go back to reference Coleman, J.S.: Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1990) Coleman, J.S.: Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1990)
go back to reference Collier, D., Brady, H.E., Seawright, J.: Outdated views of qualitative methods: time to move on. Political Anal. 18, 506–513 (2010)CrossRef Collier, D., Brady, H.E., Seawright, J.: Outdated views of qualitative methods: time to move on. Political Anal. 18, 506–513 (2010)CrossRef
go back to reference Coppedge, M.: Thickening thin concepts and theories: combining large N and small in comparative politics. Comp. Politics 31, 465–476 (1999)CrossRef Coppedge, M.: Thickening thin concepts and theories: combining large N and small in comparative politics. Comp. Politics 31, 465–476 (1999)CrossRef
go back to reference Deutsch, K.W.: The Nerves of Government?: Models of Political Communication and Control. Free Press, New York (1963) Deutsch, K.W.: The Nerves of Government?: Models of Political Communication and Control. Free Press, New York (1963)
go back to reference Duit, A., Galaz, V.: Governance and complexity-emerging issues for governance theory. Governance 21, 311–335 (2008)CrossRef Duit, A., Galaz, V.: Governance and complexity-emerging issues for governance theory. Governance 21, 311–335 (2008)CrossRef
go back to reference Easton, D.: A Framework for Political Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1965) Easton, D.: A Framework for Political Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1965)
go back to reference Elster, J.: Explaining Social Behavior?: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)CrossRef Elster, J.: Explaining Social Behavior?: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)CrossRef
go back to reference Fung, A.: Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Adm. Rev. 66, 66–75 (2006)CrossRef Fung, A.: Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Adm. Rev. 66, 66–75 (2006)CrossRef
go back to reference George, A.L., Bennett, A.: Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005) George, A.L., Bennett, A.: Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)
go back to reference Gerring, J.: Case Study Research?: Principles and Practices. Cambridge University Press, New York (2007) Gerring, J.: Case Study Research?: Principles and Practices. Cambridge University Press, New York (2007)
go back to reference Gerring, J.: The mechanismic worldview: thinking inside the box. Br. J. Political Sci. 38, 161–179 (2008)CrossRef Gerring, J.: The mechanismic worldview: thinking inside the box. Br. J. Political Sci. 38, 161–179 (2008)CrossRef
go back to reference Gerring, J.: Causal mechanisms: yes, but... Comp. Political Stud. 43, 1499–1526 (2010) Gerring, J.: Causal mechanisms: yes, but... Comp. Political Stud. 43, 1499–1526 (2010)
go back to reference Gill, J., Meier, K.J.: Public administration research and practice: a methodological manifesto. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 10, 157–199 (2000)CrossRef Gill, J., Meier, K.J.: Public administration research and practice: a methodological manifesto. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 10, 157–199 (2000)CrossRef
go back to reference Goodsell, C.T.: A new vision for public administration. Public Adm. Rev. 66, 623–635 (2006)CrossRef Goodsell, C.T.: A new vision for public administration. Public Adm. Rev. 66, 623–635 (2006)CrossRef
go back to reference Hedström, P.: Dissecting the Social?: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)CrossRef Hedström, P.: Dissecting the Social?: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)CrossRef
go back to reference Hedström, P., Swedberg, R.: Social Mechanisms?: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)CrossRef Hedström, P., Swedberg, R.: Social Mechanisms?: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)CrossRef
go back to reference Held, D.: Regulating globalization? The reinvention of politics. Int. Sociol. 15, 394–408 (2000)CrossRef Held, D.: Regulating globalization? The reinvention of politics. Int. Sociol. 15, 394–408 (2000)CrossRef
go back to reference Jervis, R.: System Effects?: Complexity in Political and Social Life. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1997) Jervis, R.: System Effects?: Complexity in Political and Social Life. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1997)
go back to reference Kettl, D.F.: The Transformation of Governance: Public Administration for Twenty-First Century America. JHU Press, Baltimore (2002) Kettl, D.F.: The Transformation of Governance: Public Administration for Twenty-First Century America. JHU Press, Baltimore (2002)
go back to reference King, G., Keohane, R.O., Verba, S.: Designing Social Inquiry?: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1994) King, G., Keohane, R.O., Verba, S.: Designing Social Inquiry?: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1994)
go back to reference Kingdon, J.W.: Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Foresman and Company, London (1984) Kingdon, J.W.: Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Foresman and Company, London (1984)
go back to reference Kjær, A.M., Kjær, A.M.: Governance. Polity Press, Cambridge (2004) Kjær, A.M., Kjær, A.M.: Governance. Polity Press, Cambridge (2004)
go back to reference Klijn, E.-H.: Complexity theory and public administration: what’s new? Public Manag. Rev. 10, 299–317 (2008)CrossRef Klijn, E.-H.: Complexity theory and public administration: what’s new? Public Manag. Rev. 10, 299–317 (2008)CrossRef
go back to reference Kooiman, J.: Governing as Governance. Sage, London (2003) Kooiman, J.: Governing as Governance. Sage, London (2003)
go back to reference Lane, J.E.: New Public Management. Routledge, London (2000) Lane, J.E.: New Public Management. Routledge, London (2000)
go back to reference Laswell, H.D.: Politics: Who Gets What?. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1935) Laswell, H.D.: Politics: Who Gets What?. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1935)
go back to reference Lidén, G.: Democracy and Diffusion Creating a Comprehensive Model for Explaining Democracy. Mittuniversitetet, Sundsvall, Inst. för samhällvetenskap (2011) Lidén, G.: Democracy and Diffusion Creating a Comprehensive Model for Explaining Democracy. Mittuniversitetet, Sundsvall, Inst. för samhällvetenskap (2011)
go back to reference Lidén, G.: What about theory? The consequences on a widened perspective of social theory. Qual. Quant. 47, 213–225 (2013)CrossRef Lidén, G.: What about theory? The consequences on a widened perspective of social theory. Qual. Quant. 47, 213–225 (2013)CrossRef
go back to reference Lindblom, C.E.: The science of “muddling through”. Public Adm. Rev. 19, 79–88 (1959)CrossRef Lindblom, C.E.: The science of “muddling through”. Public Adm. Rev. 19, 79–88 (1959)CrossRef
go back to reference Loorbach, D.: Transition management for sustainable development: a prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance 23, 161–183 (2010)CrossRef Loorbach, D.: Transition management for sustainable development: a prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance 23, 161–183 (2010)CrossRef
go back to reference Lowery, D., Evans, K.G.: The iron cage of methodology. Adm. Soc. 36, 306–327 (2004)CrossRef Lowery, D., Evans, K.G.: The iron cage of methodology. Adm. Soc. 36, 306–327 (2004)CrossRef
go back to reference Lundqvist, L.J.: Privatization: towards a concept for comparative policy analysis. J. Public Policy 8, 1–19 (1988)CrossRef Lundqvist, L.J.: Privatization: towards a concept for comparative policy analysis. J. Public Policy 8, 1–19 (1988)CrossRef
go back to reference Mahoney, J.: Nominal, ordinal, and narrative appraisal in macrocausal analysis. Am. J. Sociol. 104, 1154–1196 (1999)CrossRef Mahoney, J.: Nominal, ordinal, and narrative appraisal in macrocausal analysis. Am. J. Sociol. 104, 1154–1196 (1999)CrossRef
go back to reference Mahoney, J.: Beyond correlational analysis: recent innovations in theory and method. Sociol. Forum. 16, 575–593 (2001)CrossRef Mahoney, J.: Beyond correlational analysis: recent innovations in theory and method. Sociol. Forum. 16, 575–593 (2001)CrossRef
go back to reference Marsh, D.: Meta-theoretical issues. In: Marsh, D., Stoker, G. (eds.) Theory and Methods in Political Science. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2010) Marsh, D.: Meta-theoretical issues. In: Marsh, D., Stoker, G. (eds.) Theory and Methods in Political Science. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2010)
go back to reference Munck, G.L.: Tools for qualitative research. In: Brady, H.E., Collier, D. (eds.) Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, pp. 105–121. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham (2004) Munck, G.L.: Tools for qualitative research. In: Brady, H.E., Collier, D. (eds.) Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, pp. 105–121. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham (2004)
go back to reference Papadopoulos, Y.: Cooperative forms of governance: problems of democratic accountability in complex environments. Eur. J. Political Res. 42, 473–501 (2003)CrossRef Papadopoulos, Y.: Cooperative forms of governance: problems of democratic accountability in complex environments. Eur. J. Political Res. 42, 473–501 (2003)CrossRef
go back to reference Payne, J.W.: Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: an information search and protocol analysis. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 16, 366–387 (1976)CrossRef Payne, J.W.: Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: an information search and protocol analysis. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 16, 366–387 (1976)CrossRef
go back to reference Peters, B.G.: Comparative Politics: Theory and Methods. Macmillan, London (1998) Peters, B.G.: Comparative Politics: Theory and Methods. Macmillan, London (1998)
go back to reference Pierre, J., Peters, B.G.: Governance, Politics, and the State. St. Martin’s Press, New York (2000) Pierre, J., Peters, B.G.: Governance, Politics, and the State. St. Martin’s Press, New York (2000)
go back to reference Pierre, J., Peters, B.G.: Governing Complex Societies?: Trajectories and Scenarios. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke (2005)CrossRef Pierre, J., Peters, B.G.: Governing Complex Societies?: Trajectories and Scenarios. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke (2005)CrossRef
go back to reference Provan, K.G., Kenis, P.: Modes of network governance: structure, management, and effectiveness. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 18, 229–252 (2008)CrossRef Provan, K.G., Kenis, P.: Modes of network governance: structure, management, and effectiveness. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 18, 229–252 (2008)CrossRef
go back to reference Przeworski, A., Teune, H.: The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. Wiley-Interscience, New York (1970) Przeworski, A., Teune, H.: The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. Wiley-Interscience, New York (1970)
go back to reference Rhodes, R.A.W.: The new governance: governing without government. Political Stud. Lond. 44, 652–667 (1996)CrossRef Rhodes, R.A.W.: The new governance: governing without government. Political Stud. Lond. 44, 652–667 (1996)CrossRef
go back to reference Rhodes, R.A.W.: Understanding Governance?: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Open University Press, Buckingham (1997) Rhodes, R.A.W.: Understanding Governance?: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Open University Press, Buckingham (1997)
go back to reference Rothstein, B.: Social Traps and the Problem of Trust. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)CrossRef Rothstein, B.: Social Traps and the Problem of Trust. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)CrossRef
go back to reference Simon, H.A.: Administrative Behavior?: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. Macmillan, New York (1957) Simon, H.A.: Administrative Behavior?: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. Macmillan, New York (1957)
go back to reference Stoker, G.: Governance as theory: five propositions. Int. Soc. Sci. Rev. 50, 17–28 (1998)CrossRef Stoker, G.: Governance as theory: five propositions. Int. Soc. Sci. Rev. 50, 17–28 (1998)CrossRef
go back to reference Tansey, O.: Process tracing and elite interviewing: a case for non-probability sampling. Political Sci. 40, 765–772 (2007) Tansey, O.: Process tracing and elite interviewing: a case for non-probability sampling. Political Sci. 40, 765–772 (2007)
go back to reference Tarrow, S.: Bridging the quantitative-qualitative divide. In: Brady, H.E., Collier, D. (eds.) Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, pp. 171–180. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham (2004) Tarrow, S.: Bridging the quantitative-qualitative divide. In: Brady, H.E., Collier, D. (eds.) Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, pp. 171–180. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham (2004)
go back to reference Teisman, G.R., Klijn, E.-H.: Complexity theory and public management. Public Manag. Rev. 10, 287–297 (2008)CrossRef Teisman, G.R., Klijn, E.-H.: Complexity theory and public management. Public Manag. Rev. 10, 287–297 (2008)CrossRef
go back to reference Todd, P., Benbasat, I.: Process tracing methods in decision support systems research: exploring the black box. MIS Q. 11, 493–512 (1987)CrossRef Todd, P., Benbasat, I.: Process tracing methods in decision support systems research: exploring the black box. MIS Q. 11, 493–512 (1987)CrossRef
go back to reference Udehn, L.: The changing face of methodological individualism. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 28, 479–507 (2002)CrossRef Udehn, L.: The changing face of methodological individualism. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 28, 479–507 (2002)CrossRef
go back to reference Wachhaus, T.A.: Anarchy as a model for network governance. Public Adm. Rev. 72, 33–42 (2012)CrossRef Wachhaus, T.A.: Anarchy as a model for network governance. Public Adm. Rev. 72, 33–42 (2012)CrossRef
go back to reference Verba, S., Schlozman, K.L., Brady, H.E.: Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1995) Verba, S., Schlozman, K.L., Brady, H.E.: Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1995)
go back to reference Verschuren, P., Arts, B.: Quantifying influence in complex decision making by means of paired comparisons. Qual. Quant. 38, 495–516 (2005)CrossRef Verschuren, P., Arts, B.: Quantifying influence in complex decision making by means of paired comparisons. Qual. Quant. 38, 495–516 (2005)CrossRef
go back to reference Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2009) Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2009)
Metadata
Title
Methods for analyzing decision-making: a framework approach
Authors
Jon Nyhlén
Gustav Lidén
Publication date
01-09-2014
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Quality & Quantity / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 0033-5177
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7845
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-013-9905-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

Quality & Quantity 5/2014 Go to the issue