Top

Journal of Science Education and Technology

Published in:

04-05-2021

Middle School Student Knowledge of and Attitudes Toward Synthetic Biology

Author: Justice T. Walker

Published in: Journal of Science Education and Technology | Issue 6/2021

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Synthetic biology is a field that leverages design, biology, engineering, and computation to genetically engineer organisms to make usable products such as sustainably manufactured textiles, biodegradable chemicals, and personalized medicine. Despite increases in access, we know little about what younger learners know and think about these modern applications. This is problematic for reasons related to civic engagement and field participation. This research addresses this by examining a group (n = 66) of middle school youth (ages 11 to 14) in the United States (US). Analysis of survey and interview data suggests that, while students know very little about synthetic biology, they nevertheless have well-formed attitudes that involve considerations that are typically observed in older student groups. Findings also suggest that perspectives among this group were still forming and flexible. Opportunities to support student learning and literacy in this emerging field are discussed in terms of their geopolitical, sociocultural, and educational influences.

previous article Stimulating Mechanistic Reasoning in Physics Using Student-Constructed Stop-Motion Animations

next article How Science Teachers DiALoG Classrooms: Towards a Practical and Responsive Formative Assessment of Oral Argumentation

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Andrianantoandro, E., Basu, S., Karig, D. K., & Weiss, R. (2006). Synthetic Biology: New Engineering Rules for an Emerging Discipline. Molecular Systems Biology, 2(1), 2006–2028. https://doi.org/10.1038/msb4100073CrossRef

American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2015). Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: Chronicling change, inspiring the future. American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Amino Labs. (2019). Retrieved from https://amino.bio/

Anagun, S. S. (2012). Eighth-grade students' perceptions of biotechnology: a case study. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 9(3).

Beyer, P., Al-Babili, S., Ye, X., Lucca, P., Schaub, P., Welsch, R., & Potrykus, I. (2002). Golden rice: Introducing the β-carotene biosynthesis pathway into rice endosperm by genetic engineering to defeat vitamin A deficiency. The Journal of nutrition, 132(3), 506S-510S. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/132.3.506SCrossRef

BioDesign Challenge (2018). Retrieved from https://biodesignchallenge.org

Cavanagh, H., Hood, J., & Wilkinson, J. (2005). Riverina high school students’ views of biotechnology. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 8(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.2225/vol8-issue2-fulltext-1CrossRef

Chen, S. Y., & Raffan, J. (1999). Biotechnology: student’s knowledge and attitudes in the LJK and Taiwan. Journal of Biological Education, 34(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1999.9655678CrossRef

Črne-Hladnik, H., Peklaj, C., Košmelj, K., Hladnik, A., & Javornik, B. (2009). Assessment of Slovene secondary school students’ attitudes to biotechnology in terms of usefulness, moral acceptability and risk perception. Public Understanding of Science, 18(6), 747–758. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662509337361CrossRef

Dawson, V. (2007). An exploration of high school (12–17 year old) students’ understandings of, and attitudes towards biotechnology processes. Research in Science Education, 37(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9016-7CrossRef

Dawson, V., & Schibeci, R. (2003a). Western Australian school students’ understanding of biotechnology. International Journal of Science Education, 25(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210126720CrossRef

Dawson, V., & Schibeci, R. (2003b). Western Australian high school students’ attitudes towards biotechnology processes: Case studies. Journal of Biological Education, 38(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2003.9655889CrossRef

Dawson, V., & Soames, C. (2006). The effect of biotechnology education on Australian high school students’ understandings and attitudes about biotechnology processes. Research in Science & Technological Education, 24(2), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140600811569CrossRef

Dawson, V., & Venville, G. J. (2009). High-school Students’ Informal Reasoning and Argumentation about Biotechnology: An indicator of scientific literacy? International Journal of Science Education, 31(11), 1421–1445. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690801992870CrossRef

Dawson, V. M., & Venville, G. (2010). Teaching strategies for developing students’ argumentation skills about socioscientific issues in high school genetics. Research in Science Education, 40(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9104-yCrossRef

Endy, D. (2005). Foundations for Engineering Biology. Nature, 438(7067), 449–453. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04342CrossRef

Fonseca, M. J., Costa, P., Lencastre, L., & Tavares, F. (2011). Multidimensional analysis of high-school students’ perceptions about biotechnology. Journal of Biological Education, 46(3), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2011.634019CrossRef

Fonseca, M. J., Costa, P., Lencastre, L., & Tavares, F. (2013). A statistical approach to quantitative data validation focused on the assessment of students’ perceptions about biotechnology. Springerplus, 2(1), 496. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-496CrossRef

Forster, A. C., & Church, G. M. (2007). Synthetic Biology Projects In Vitro. Genome Research, 17(1), 1–6. http://www.genome.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gr.5776007

Genspace. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.genspace.org/

Gunter, B., Kinderlerer, J., & Beyleveld, D. (1998). Teenagers and biotechnology: A survey of understanding and opinion in Britain. Studies in Science Education, 32, 81–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269808560128CrossRef

Gutmann, A. (2011). The ethics of synthetic biology: guiding principles for emerging technologies. Hastings Center Report, 41(4), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1552-146X.2011.tb00118.xCrossRef

Hill, R., Stanisstreet, M., Boyes, E., & O’sullivan, H. . (1998). Reactions to a new technology: students’ ideas about genetically engineered foodstuffs. Research in Science & Technological Education, 16(2), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514980160208CrossRef

Huang, A., Nguyen, P. Q., Stark, J. C., Takahashi, M. K., Donghia, N., Ferrante, T., Dy, A. J., Hsu, K. J., Dubner, R. S., Pardee, K., Jewett, M. C., & Collins, J. J. (2018). BioBits™ Explorer: A modular synthetic biology education kit. Science advances, 4(8), eaat5105. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat5105

iGEM. (2020). Retrieved from: https://igem.org/Main_Page

Kafai, Y. B., & Walker, J. T. (2020a). Twenty Things to Make with Biology. CONSTRUCTIONISM, 2020, 598

Kafai, Y. B., & Walker, J. T. (2020b). Bringing 21st-century science into schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 102(1), 38–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721720956848CrossRef

Kafai, Y., Telhan, O., Hogan, K., Lui, D., Anderson, E., Walker, J. T., & Hanna, S. (2017). Growing designs with biomakerlab in high school classrooms. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 503–508). https://doi.org/10.1145/3078072.3084316

Khalil, A. S., & Collins, J. J. (2010). Synthetic Biology: Applications Come of Age. Nature Reviews Genetics, 11(5), 367–379. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2775CrossRef

Klop, T., & Severiens, S. (2007). An exploration of attitudes towards modern biotechnology: A study among Dutch secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 29(5), 663–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600951556CrossRef

Lindahl, M. G., & Lundin, M. (2016). How do 15–16 year old students use scientific knowledge to justify their reasoning about human sexuality and relationships? Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.08.009CrossRef

Lock, R. (1994). What Do 14 to 16-year-olds Know and Think about Biotechnology? Nutrition & Food Science, 94(3), 29–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/00346659410055101CrossRef

Lock, R., & Miles, C. (1993). Biotechnology and genetic engineering: students’ knowledge and attitudes. Journal of Biological Education, 27(4), 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1993.9655347CrossRef

Means, M. L., & Voss, J. F. (1996). Who reasons well? Two studies of informal reasoning among children of different grade, ability, and knowledge levels. Cognition and Instruction, 14(2), 139–178. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1402_1CrossRef

Mohapatra, A. K., Priyadarshini, D., & Biswas, A. (2010). Genetically modified food: knowledge and attitude of teachers and students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9215-xCrossRef

National Research Council. (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. National Academies Press.

Ozel, M., Erdogan, M., Usak, M., & Prokop, P. (2009). High school students’ knowledge and attitudes regarding biotechnology applications. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 9(1), 321–328

Pellegrino, J. W., Wilson, M. R., Koenig, J. A., & Beatty, A. S. (2014). Developing Assessments for the Next Generation Science Standards. National Academies Press. 500 Fifth Street NW, Washington, DC 20001.

Porter, D. L., Levine, B. L., Kalos, M., Bagg, A., & June, C. H. (2011). Chimeric antigen receptor–modified T cells in chronic lymphoid leukemia. New England Journal of Medicine, 365(8), 725–733. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1103849CrossRef

Prokop, P., Lešková, A., Kubiatko, M., & Diran, C. (2007). Slovakian students’ knowledge of and attitudes toward biotechnology. International Journal of Science Education, 29(7), 895–907. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600969830CrossRef

Ravitch, S. M., & Carl, N. M. (2015). Qualitative research: Bridging the Conceptual, Theoretical, and Methodological. Sage Publications.

Reece, J. B., Urry, L. A., Cain, M. L., Wasserman, S. A., Minorsky, P. V., & Jackson, R. B. (2014). Campbell Biology (No. s 1309). Boston: Pearson.

Roth, W. M., & Barton, A. C. (2004). Rethinking scientific literacy. Routledge.CrossRef

Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009CrossRef

Sadler, T. D. (Ed.). (2011). Socio-scientific Issues in The Classroom: Teaching, learning and research (Vol. 39). Springer Science & Business Media.

Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry?.Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9

Stark, J. C., Huang, A., Nguyen, P. Q., Dubner, R. S., Hsu, K. J., Ferrante, T. C.,Anderson, M., Kanapskyte, A., Quinn Mucha, Q., Packett, J. Patel P., Patel R., Qaq D., Zondor T., Burke J., Martinez T., Miller-Berry A., Puppala A., Reichert K., Schmid M., Brand L., Hill L., Chellaswamy J., Faheem N. , Fetherling S., Gong E., Gonzalzles E.M., Granito T., Koritsaris J., Nguyen B., Ottman S., Palffy C., Patel A., Skweres S., Adriane Slaton A., Woods T., Donghia N., Pardee K., Collins J., Jewett, M. (2018). BioBits™ Bright: A fluorescent synthetic biology education kit. Science Advances, 4(8), eaat5107. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat5107

The Tech Interactive. (2020). BioDesign Studio. Retrieved from https://www.thetech.org/biodesignstudio

Usak, M., Erdogan, M., Prokop, P., & Ozel, M. (2009). High school and university students’ knowledge and attitudes regarding biotechnology. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 37(2), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20267CrossRef

Van Lieshout, E., & Dawson, V. (2016). Knowledge of and attitudes towards health-related biotechnology. applications amongst Australian year 10 high school students. Journal of Biological Education, 50(3), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2015.1117511

Verish, C., Strawhacker, A., Bers, M., & Shaer, O. (2018). CRISPEE: A Tangible Gene Editing Platform for Early Childhood. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (pp. 101–107). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173225.3173277

Walker, J. T., Shaw, M., Kafai, Y., & Lui, D. (2018). Biohacking food: a case study of science inquiry and design reflections about a synthetic biology high school workshop. In Kay, J. and Luckin, R. (Eds.) Rethinking learning in the digital age: making the learning sciences count, 13th international conference of the learning sciences (ICLS) 2018, Volume 3. London, UK: International Society of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.22318/cscl2018.1559

Walker, J. T., & Kafai, Y. B. (2021). The biodesign studio: Constructions and reflections of high school youth on making with living media. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13081CrossRef

Zeller, P., & Zocher, D. (2012). Ecovative’s breakthrough biomaterials. Fungi Magazine, 5(1), 51–56

Title: Middle School Student Knowledge of and Attitudes Toward Synthetic Biology
Author: Justice T. Walker
Publication date: 04-05-2021
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: Journal of Science Education and Technology / Issue 6/2021
Print ISSN: 1059-0145
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1839
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09919-y

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 6/2021

Preparing GTAs for Active Learning in the General Chemistry Lab: Development of an Evidence-Based Rehearsal Module for a Mixed-Reality Teaching Simulator

“It’s Like I’m Really There”: Using VR Experiences for STEM Career Development

Investigating the Links Between Students’ Learning Engagement and Modeling Competence in Computer-Supported Modeling-Based Activities

A Learning Experience in Inquiry-Based Physics with Immersive Virtual Reality: Student Perceptions and an Interaction Effect Between Conceptual Gains and Attitudinal Profiles

“Feeling like a Scientist”: Factors Affecting Students’ Selections of Technology Tools in the Science Classroom

Stimulating Mechanistic Reasoning in Physics Using Student-Constructed Stop-Motion Animations

Premium Partners