Skip to main content
Top

04-02-2024

Modeling the Maximum Perceived Utility Consensus Based on Prospect Theory

Authors: Dong Cheng, Yong Wu, Yuxiang Yuan, Faxin Cheng, Dianwei Chen

Published in: Group Decision and Negotiation

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Expected utility consensus models aim to obtain a consensus solution with the maximum utility of the group. However, decision-makers (DMs) are often bounded rational in practice and their loss aversion behaviors have an important impact on the consensus-reaching, which may lead to a deviation between the actual decision and the theoretical solution. To solve this issue, we propose a maximum perceived utility consensus model based on prospect theory (MPUCM-PT) to maximize the perceived utility of the group under a budget constraint. The individual perceived utility is measured by the prospect value, and individual adjusted opinion is taken as an endogenous reference point. To explore the influence of different consensus levels on consensus modeling, we further develop a soft MPUCM-PT based on soft consensus measure. Then, upper and lower bounds of the optimal budget are given to provide a reference for setting a reasonable budget. Finally, the proposed consensus models are verified by the case of China’s Taihu Lake pollution control. Results show that, with the same level of budget, the utility satisfaction obtained by the MPUCM-PT is higher than that obtained by expected utility consensus models. Moreover, the group perceived utility based on prospect theory is also improved.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Abdellaoui M, Kemel E (2014) Eliciting prospect theory when consequences are measured in time units: “time is not money’’. Manag Sci 60(7):1844–1859CrossRef Abdellaoui M, Kemel E (2014) Eliciting prospect theory when consequences are measured in time units: “time is not money’’. Manag Sci 60(7):1844–1859CrossRef
go back to reference Ben-Arieh D, Easton T (2007) Multi-criteria group consensus under linear cost opinion elasticity. Decis Support Syst 43(3):713–721CrossRef Ben-Arieh D, Easton T (2007) Multi-criteria group consensus under linear cost opinion elasticity. Decis Support Syst 43(3):713–721CrossRef
go back to reference Ben-Arieh D, Easton T, Evans B (2009) Minimum cost consensus with quadratic cost functions. IEEE Trans Syst, Man, Cybern-Part A Syst Humans 39(1):210–217CrossRef Ben-Arieh D, Easton T, Evans B (2009) Minimum cost consensus with quadratic cost functions. IEEE Trans Syst, Man, Cybern-Part A Syst Humans 39(1):210–217CrossRef
go back to reference Cheng D, Zhou ZL, Cheng FX, Zhou YF, Xie YJ (2018) Modeling the minimum cost consensus problem in an asymmetric costs context. Eur J Oper Res 270(3):1122–1137MathSciNetCrossRef Cheng D, Zhou ZL, Cheng FX, Zhou YF, Xie YJ (2018) Modeling the minimum cost consensus problem in an asymmetric costs context. Eur J Oper Res 270(3):1122–1137MathSciNetCrossRef
go back to reference Cheng D, Cheng FX, Zhou ZL, Wu Y (2020) Reaching a minimum adjustment consensus in social network group decision-making. Inf Fusion 59:30–43CrossRef Cheng D, Cheng FX, Zhou ZL, Wu Y (2020) Reaching a minimum adjustment consensus in social network group decision-making. Inf Fusion 59:30–43CrossRef
go back to reference Cheng D, Yuan YX, Wu Y, Hao TT, Cheng FX (2022) Maximum satisfaction consensus with budget constraints considering individual tolerance and compromise limit behaviors. Eur J Oper Res 297:221–238MathSciNetCrossRef Cheng D, Yuan YX, Wu Y, Hao TT, Cheng FX (2022) Maximum satisfaction consensus with budget constraints considering individual tolerance and compromise limit behaviors. Eur J Oper Res 297:221–238MathSciNetCrossRef
go back to reference Dong Y, Xu KF, Song SN, Zhou C (2021) Quality reference in consumer product recalls. Decis Sci 52(4):893–919CrossRef Dong Y, Xu KF, Song SN, Zhou C (2021) Quality reference in consumer product recalls. Decis Sci 52(4):893–919CrossRef
go back to reference Fan ZP, Zhang X, Chen DF, Liu Y (2013) Multiple attribute decision making considering aspiration-levels: a method based on prospect theory. Comput Ind Eng 65(3):341–350CrossRef Fan ZP, Zhang X, Chen DF, Liu Y (2013) Multiple attribute decision making considering aspiration-levels: a method based on prospect theory. Comput Ind Eng 65(3):341–350CrossRef
go back to reference Giorgi ED, Post T (2010) Loss aversion with a state-dependent reference point. Manag Sci 57(6):1094–1110CrossRef Giorgi ED, Post T (2010) Loss aversion with a state-dependent reference point. Manag Sci 57(6):1094–1110CrossRef
go back to reference Gong ZW, Zhang HH, Forrest J, Li LS, Xu XX (2015) Two consensus models based on the minimum cost and maximum return regarding either all individuals or one individual. Eur J Oper Res 240(1):183–192MathSciNetCrossRef Gong ZW, Zhang HH, Forrest J, Li LS, Xu XX (2015) Two consensus models based on the minimum cost and maximum return regarding either all individuals or one individual. Eur J Oper Res 240(1):183–192MathSciNetCrossRef
go back to reference Gong ZW, Xu XX, Li LS, Xu C (2015) Consensus modeling with nonlinear utility and cost constraints: a case study. Knowl-Based Syst 88:210–222CrossRef Gong ZW, Xu XX, Li LS, Xu C (2015) Consensus modeling with nonlinear utility and cost constraints: a case study. Knowl-Based Syst 88:210–222CrossRef
go back to reference Gong ZW, Xu C, Chiclana F, Xu XX (2017) Consensus measure with multi-stage fluctuation utility based on China’s urban demolition negotiation. Group Decis Negot 26(2):379–407CrossRef Gong ZW, Xu C, Chiclana F, Xu XX (2017) Consensus measure with multi-stage fluctuation utility based on China’s urban demolition negotiation. Group Decis Negot 26(2):379–407CrossRef
go back to reference Gong ZW, Xu XX, Guo WW, Herrera-Viedma E, Francisco JC (2021) Minimum cost consensus modelling under various linear uncertain-constrained scenarios. Inf Fusion 66:1–17CrossRef Gong ZW, Xu XX, Guo WW, Herrera-Viedma E, Francisco JC (2021) Minimum cost consensus modelling under various linear uncertain-constrained scenarios. Inf Fusion 66:1–17CrossRef
go back to reference Gong ZW, Guo WW, Slowinski R (2021) Transaction and interaction behavior-based consensus model and its application to optimal carbon emission reduction. Omega 104:102491CrossRef Gong ZW, Guo WW, Slowinski R (2021) Transaction and interaction behavior-based consensus model and its application to optimal carbon emission reduction. Omega 104:102491CrossRef
go back to reference Gu J, Zheng Y, Tian XL, Xu ZS (2021) A decision-making framework based on prospect theory with probabilistic linguistic term sets. J Oper Res Soc 72(4):879–888CrossRef Gu J, Zheng Y, Tian XL, Xu ZS (2021) A decision-making framework based on prospect theory with probabilistic linguistic term sets. J Oper Res Soc 72(4):879–888CrossRef
go back to reference Huang YS, Chang WC, Li WH, Li ZL (2013) Aggregation of utility-based individual preferences for group decision-making. Eur J Oper Res 229(2):462–469MathSciNetCrossRef Huang YS, Chang WC, Li WH, Li ZL (2013) Aggregation of utility-based individual preferences for group decision-making. Eur J Oper Res 229(2):462–469MathSciNetCrossRef
go back to reference Köszegi B, Rabin M (2006) A model of reference-dependent preferences. Q J Econ 121(4):1133–1165 Köszegi B, Rabin M (2006) A model of reference-dependent preferences. Q J Econ 121(4):1133–1165
go back to reference Köszegi B, Rabin M (2007) Reference-dependent risk attitudes. Am Econ Rev 97(4):1047–1073CrossRef Köszegi B, Rabin M (2007) Reference-dependent risk attitudes. Am Econ Rev 97(4):1047–1073CrossRef
go back to reference Labella I, Liu HB, Rodríguez RM, Martínez L (2020) A cost consensus metric for consensus reaching processes based on a comprehensive minimum cost model. Eur J Oper Res 281(2):316–331MathSciNetCrossRef Labella I, Liu HB, Rodríguez RM, Martínez L (2020) A cost consensus metric for consensus reaching processes based on a comprehensive minimum cost model. Eur J Oper Res 281(2):316–331MathSciNetCrossRef
go back to reference Liang HM, Xiong W, Dong YH (2018) A prospect theory-based method for fusing the individual preference-approval structures in group decision making. Comput Ind Eng 117:237–248CrossRef Liang HM, Xiong W, Dong YH (2018) A prospect theory-based method for fusing the individual preference-approval structures in group decision making. Comput Ind Eng 117:237–248CrossRef
go back to reference Long J, Liang HM, Gao L, Guo ZX, Dong Y (2021) Consensus reaching with two-stage minimum adjustments in multi-attribute group decision making: a method based on preference-approval structure and prospect theory. Comput Ind Eng 158:107349CrossRef Long J, Liang HM, Gao L, Guo ZX, Dong Y (2021) Consensus reaching with two-stage minimum adjustments in multi-attribute group decision making: a method based on preference-approval structure and prospect theory. Comput Ind Eng 158:107349CrossRef
go back to reference Pearson K (1894) Contributions to the mathematical theory of evolution. Philos Trans R Soc 185:71–110ADS Pearson K (1894) Contributions to the mathematical theory of evolution. Philos Trans R Soc 185:71–110ADS
go back to reference Song HH, Gong ZW, Forrest JYL, Guo WW, Herrera-Viedma E (2023) Social network utility consensus model with empathic and fuzzy interactions. Comput Ind Eng 175:108904CrossRef Song HH, Gong ZW, Forrest JYL, Guo WW, Herrera-Viedma E (2023) Social network utility consensus model with empathic and fuzzy interactions. Comput Ind Eng 175:108904CrossRef
go back to reference Tan X, Zhu JJ, Wu T (2022) Dynamic reference point-oriented consensus mechanism in linguistic distribution group decision making restricted by quantum integration of information. Group Decis Negot 31(2):491–528PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Tan X, Zhu JJ, Wu T (2022) Dynamic reference point-oriented consensus mechanism in linguistic distribution group decision making restricted by quantum integration of information. Group Decis Negot 31(2):491–528PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
go back to reference Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory. J Risk Uncertain 5(4):297–323CrossRef Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory. J Risk Uncertain 5(4):297–323CrossRef
go back to reference Wang ZL, Wang YM (2020) Prospect theory-based group decision-making with stochastic uncertainty and 2-tuple aspirations under linguistic assessments. Inf Fusion 56:81–92CrossRef Wang ZL, Wang YM (2020) Prospect theory-based group decision-making with stochastic uncertainty and 2-tuple aspirations under linguistic assessments. Inf Fusion 56:81–92CrossRef
go back to reference Wang H, Liao HC, Huang B, Xu ZS (2021) Determining consensus thresholds for group decision making with preference relations. J Oper Res Soc 72(10):2290–2300CrossRef Wang H, Liao HC, Huang B, Xu ZS (2021) Determining consensus thresholds for group decision making with preference relations. J Oper Res Soc 72(10):2290–2300CrossRef
go back to reference Wang Y, Zhan JM, Zhang C (2023) A three-way decision method based on prospect theory under probabilistic linguistic term sets. Inf Sci 645:119342CrossRef Wang Y, Zhan JM, Zhang C (2023) A three-way decision method based on prospect theory under probabilistic linguistic term sets. Inf Sci 645:119342CrossRef
go back to reference Wu J, Dai LF, Chiclana F, Fujita H, Herrera-Viedma E (2018) A minimum adjustment cost feedback mechanism based consensus model for group decision making under social network with distributed linguistic trust. Inf Fusion 41:232–242CrossRef Wu J, Dai LF, Chiclana F, Fujita H, Herrera-Viedma E (2018) A minimum adjustment cost feedback mechanism based consensus model for group decision making under social network with distributed linguistic trust. Inf Fusion 41:232–242CrossRef
go back to reference Wu ZB, Yang XY, Tu JC, Chen X (2019) Optimal consistency and consensus models for interval additive preference relations: a discrete distribution perspective. J Oper Res Soc 71(9):1479–1497CrossRef Wu ZB, Yang XY, Tu JC, Chen X (2019) Optimal consistency and consensus models for interval additive preference relations: a discrete distribution perspective. J Oper Res Soc 71(9):1479–1497CrossRef
go back to reference Xu WJ, Huang SY, Li J (2019) A novel consensus reaching framework for heterogeneous group decision making based on cumulative prospect theory. Comput Ind Eng 128:325–335CrossRef Xu WJ, Huang SY, Li J (2019) A novel consensus reaching framework for heterogeneous group decision making based on cumulative prospect theory. Comput Ind Eng 128:325–335CrossRef
go back to reference Xu WJ, Chen X, Dong YC, Chiclana F (2021) Impact of decision rules and non-cooperative behaviors on minimum consensus cost in group decision making. Group Decis Negot 30(6):1239–1260CrossRef Xu WJ, Chen X, Dong YC, Chiclana F (2021) Impact of decision rules and non-cooperative behaviors on minimum consensus cost in group decision making. Group Decis Negot 30(6):1239–1260CrossRef
go back to reference Yuan YX, Cheng D, Zhou ZL, Cheng FX (2022) Minimum conflict consensus with budget constraint based on social network analysis. Comput Ind Eng 168:108098CrossRef Yuan YX, Cheng D, Zhou ZL, Cheng FX (2022) Minimum conflict consensus with budget constraint based on social network analysis. Comput Ind Eng 168:108098CrossRef
go back to reference Yucel F, Bulut E (2020) User satisfaction aware maximum utility task assignment in mobile crowdsensing. Comput Netw 277(3):964–980 Yucel F, Bulut E (2020) User satisfaction aware maximum utility task assignment in mobile crowdsensing. Comput Netw 277(3):964–980
go back to reference Zhang HH, Kou G, Peng Y (2019) Soft consensus cost models for group decision making and economic interpretations. Eur J Oper Res 122:251–261MathSciNet Zhang HH, Kou G, Peng Y (2019) Soft consensus cost models for group decision making and economic interpretations. Eur J Oper Res 122:251–261MathSciNet
go back to reference Zhang BW, Dong YC, Zhang HJ, Pedrycz W (2020) Consensus mechanism with maximum-return modifications and minimum-cost feedback: a perspective of game theory. Eur J Oper Res 287(2):546–559MathSciNetCrossRef Zhang BW, Dong YC, Zhang HJ, Pedrycz W (2020) Consensus mechanism with maximum-return modifications and minimum-cost feedback: a perspective of game theory. Eur J Oper Res 287(2):546–559MathSciNetCrossRef
go back to reference Zhang HJ, Zhao SH, Kou G, Li CC, Dong YC, Herrera F (2020) An overview on feedback mechanisms with minimum adjustment or cost in consensus reaching in group decision making: Research paradigms and challenges. Inf Fusion 60:65–79CrossRef Zhang HJ, Zhao SH, Kou G, Li CC, Dong YC, Herrera F (2020) An overview on feedback mechanisms with minimum adjustment or cost in consensus reaching in group decision making: Research paradigms and challenges. Inf Fusion 60:65–79CrossRef
go back to reference Zhang HJ, Ji Y, Qu SJ, Li H, Huang RP (2022) The robust minimum cost consensus model with risk aversion. Inf Sci 587:283–299CrossRef Zhang HJ, Ji Y, Qu SJ, Li H, Huang RP (2022) The robust minimum cost consensus model with risk aversion. Inf Sci 587:283–299CrossRef
go back to reference Zhang HH, Kou G, Peng Y (2022) Large-scale peer-to-peer loan consensus based on minimum cost consensus. J Oper Res Soc 73(10):2326–2337CrossRef Zhang HH, Kou G, Peng Y (2022) Large-scale peer-to-peer loan consensus based on minimum cost consensus. J Oper Res Soc 73(10):2326–2337CrossRef
go back to reference Zhang YJJ, Chen X, Pedrycz W, Dong YC (2023) Minimum cost consensus with altruism utility constraints in social network group decision making. IEEE Trans Syst, Man, Cybern Syst 53(8):5032–5045CrossRef Zhang YJJ, Chen X, Pedrycz W, Dong YC (2023) Minimum cost consensus with altruism utility constraints in social network group decision making. IEEE Trans Syst, Man, Cybern Syst 53(8):5032–5045CrossRef
go back to reference Zhang HH, Kou G, Peng Y (2023) Minimum cost consensus models measuring moderator’s preference on consensus levels. IEEE Trans Syst, Man, Cybern Syst 53(5):2938–2948CrossRef Zhang HH, Kou G, Peng Y (2023) Minimum cost consensus models measuring moderator’s preference on consensus levels. IEEE Trans Syst, Man, Cybern Syst 53(5):2938–2948CrossRef
go back to reference Zhao YZ, Gong ZW, Wei G, Slowinski R (2023) Consensus modeling with interactive utility and partial preorder of decision-makers, involving fairness and tolerant behavior. Inf Sci 638:118933CrossRef Zhao YZ, Gong ZW, Wei G, Slowinski R (2023) Consensus modeling with interactive utility and partial preorder of decision-makers, involving fairness and tolerant behavior. Inf Sci 638:118933CrossRef
go back to reference Zhou XY, Wang LQ, Liao HC, Wang SY, Lev B, Fujita H (2019) A prospect theory-based group decision approach considering consensus for portfolio selection with hesitant fuzzy information. Knowl-Based Syst 168:28–38CrossRef Zhou XY, Wang LQ, Liao HC, Wang SY, Lev B, Fujita H (2019) A prospect theory-based group decision approach considering consensus for portfolio selection with hesitant fuzzy information. Knowl-Based Syst 168:28–38CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Modeling the Maximum Perceived Utility Consensus Based on Prospect Theory
Authors
Dong Cheng
Yong Wu
Yuxiang Yuan
Faxin Cheng
Dianwei Chen
Publication date
04-02-2024
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Group Decision and Negotiation
Print ISSN: 0926-2644
Electronic ISSN: 1572-9907
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-023-09871-9