Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Group Decision and Negotiation 2/2022

24.02.2022

Dynamic Reference Point-Oriented Consensus Mechanism in Linguistic Distribution Group Decision Making Restricted by Quantum Integration of Information

verfasst von: Xiao Tan, Jianjun Zhu, Tong Wu

Erschienen in: Group Decision and Negotiation | Ausgabe 2/2022

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We present a consensus improvement mechanism based on prospect theory and quantum probability theory (QPT) that enables the manifestation of irrational and uncertain behaviors of decision makers (DMs) in linguistic distribution group decision making. In this framework, the DMs pursue the possibility of working with different partial agreements on prospect values. Considering that the reference information should be comprehensive and accurate as it guides information modification and affects consensus efficiency, objective and subjective information is integrated to obtain the information. Several studies have verified that the interference effect will occur when the brain beliefs flow towards the different decision classification paths. To address this problem, QPT is introduced into the information integration and the optimized value of the interference term can be acquired by the designed multi-objective programming model based on the maximum individual utility. Finally, as the reference point changes during the preference adjustment process, a dynamic reference point-oriented consensus model is constructed to obtain the optimized modification. A case study is performed on the emergency plan for the selection of designated hospitals, and comparative analyses are performed to demonstrate the feasibility and advantages of the proposed model. Several important insights are offered to simulate the most likely possibility of consciousness flowing into different decision classifications for DMs and moderators.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Aerts D, Aerts S (1995) Applications of quantum statistics in psychological studies of decision processes. Found Sci 1(1):85–97CrossRef Aerts D, Aerts S (1995) Applications of quantum statistics in psychological studies of decision processes. Found Sci 1(1):85–97CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Aerts D, Sozzo S (2012) Quantum structure in economics: the ellsberg paradox. Am Inst Phys Conf Proc 1424(1):487–494 Aerts D, Sozzo S (2012) Quantum structure in economics: the ellsberg paradox. Am Inst Phys Conf Proc 1424(1):487–494
Zurück zum Zitat Baillon A, Bleichrodt H, Spinu V (2020) Searching for the reference point. Manag Sci 66(1):93–112CrossRef Baillon A, Bleichrodt H, Spinu V (2020) Searching for the reference point. Manag Sci 66(1):93–112CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bezdek JC, Spillman B, Spillman R (1978) A fuzzy relation space for group decision theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1(4):255–268CrossRef Bezdek JC, Spillman B, Spillman R (1978) A fuzzy relation space for group decision theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1(4):255–268CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Busemeyer JR, Wang Z (2018) Data fusion using hilbert space multi-dimensional models. Theor Comput Sci 752:41–55CrossRef Busemeyer JR, Wang Z (2018) Data fusion using hilbert space multi-dimensional models. Theor Comput Sci 752:41–55CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Busemeyer JR, Wang Z, Lambert-Mogiliansky A (2009) Empirical comparison of markov and quantum models of decision-making. J Math Psychol 53(5):423–433CrossRef Busemeyer JR, Wang Z, Lambert-Mogiliansky A (2009) Empirical comparison of markov and quantum models of decision-making. J Math Psychol 53(5):423–433CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Busemeyer JR, Wang Z, Shiffrin RM (2015) Bayesian model comparison favors quantum over standard decision theory account of dynamic inconsistency. Decision 2(1):1–12CrossRef Busemeyer JR, Wang Z, Shiffrin RM (2015) Bayesian model comparison favors quantum over standard decision theory account of dynamic inconsistency. Decision 2(1):1–12CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Catarina M, Andreas W (2016) Quantum-like bayesian networks for modeling decision making. Front Psychol 7:11 Catarina M, Andreas W (2016) Quantum-like bayesian networks for modeling decision making. Front Psychol 7:11
Zurück zum Zitat Ding RX, Wang XQ, Shang K, Herrera F (2019) Social network analysis-based conflict relationship investigation and conflict degree-based consensus reaching process for large scale decision making using sparse representation. Inf Fusion 50:251–272CrossRef Ding RX, Wang XQ, Shang K, Herrera F (2019) Social network analysis-based conflict relationship investigation and conflict degree-based consensus reaching process for large scale decision making using sparse representation. Inf Fusion 50:251–272CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Ding XF, Liu HC, Shi H (2019) A dynamic approach for emergency decision making based on prospect theory with interval-valued pythagorean fuzzy linguistic variables. Comput Ind Eng 131:57–65CrossRef Ding XF, Liu HC, Shi H (2019) A dynamic approach for emergency decision making based on prospect theory with interval-valued pythagorean fuzzy linguistic variables. Comput Ind Eng 131:57–65CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dolan P, Robinson A (2001) The measurement of preferences over the distribution of benefits: the importance of the reference point. Eur Econ Rev 45(9):1697–1709CrossRef Dolan P, Robinson A (2001) The measurement of preferences over the distribution of benefits: the importance of the reference point. Eur Econ Rev 45(9):1697–1709CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Dong YC, Zhang HJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2016) Integrating experts’ weights generated dynamically into the consensus reaching process and its applications in managing non-cooperative behaviors. Decis Support Syst 84:1–15CrossRef Dong YC, Zhang HJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2016) Integrating experts’ weights generated dynamically into the consensus reaching process and its applications in managing non-cooperative behaviors. Decis Support Syst 84:1–15CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fan ZP, Ma J, Zhang Q (2002) An approach to multiple attribute decision making based on fuzzy preference information on alternatives. Fuzzy Sets Syst 131:101–106CrossRef Fan ZP, Ma J, Zhang Q (2002) An approach to multiple attribute decision making based on fuzzy preference information on alternatives. Fuzzy Sets Syst 131:101–106CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gao J, Xu ZS, Liao HC (2017) A dynamic reference point method for emergency response under hesitant probabilistic fuzzy environment. Int J Fuzzy Syst 19(5):1261–1278CrossRef Gao J, Xu ZS, Liao HC (2017) A dynamic reference point method for emergency response under hesitant probabilistic fuzzy environment. Int J Fuzzy Syst 19(5):1261–1278CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Gong ZW, Zhang HH, Forrest J, Li LS, Xu XX (2015) Two consensus models based on the minimum cost and maximum return regarding either all individuals or one individual. Eur J Operation Res 240(1):183–192CrossRef Gong ZW, Zhang HH, Forrest J, Li LS, Xu XX (2015) Two consensus models based on the minimum cost and maximum return regarding either all individuals or one individual. Eur J Operation Res 240(1):183–192CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat He ZC, Chan FTS, Jiang W (2018) A quantum framework for modelling subjectivity in multi-attribute group decision making. Comput Ind Eng 124:560–572CrossRef He ZC, Chan FTS, Jiang W (2018) A quantum framework for modelling subjectivity in multi-attribute group decision making. Comput Ind Eng 124:560–572CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (2000) Linguistic decision analysis: steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information. Fuzzy Sets Syst 115(1):67–82CrossRef Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (2000) Linguistic decision analysis: steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information. Fuzzy Sets Syst 115(1):67–82CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jing X, Wang XL, Zhang HJ (2020) Managing classification-based consensus in social network group decision making: an optimization-based approach with minimum information loss. Inf Fusion 63:74–87CrossRef Jing X, Wang XL, Zhang HJ (2020) Managing classification-based consensus in social network group decision making: an optimization-based approach with minimum information loss. Inf Fusion 63:74–87CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kamis NH, Chiclana F, Levesley J (2017) Preference similarity network structural equivalence clustering based consensus group decision making model. Appl Soft Comput 67:706–720CrossRef Kamis NH, Chiclana F, Levesley J (2017) Preference similarity network structural equivalence clustering based consensus group decision making model. Appl Soft Comput 67:706–720CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Khrennikov A (1999) Classical and quantum mechanics on information spaces with applications to cognitive, psychological, social, and anomalous phenomena. Found Phys 29(7):1065–1098CrossRef Khrennikov A (1999) Classical and quantum mechanics on information spaces with applications to cognitive, psychological, social, and anomalous phenomena. Found Phys 29(7):1065–1098CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Labella Á, Liu YY, Rodríguez RM, Martínez L (2018) Analyzing the performance of classical consensus models in large scale group decision making: a comparative study. Appl Soft Comput 67:677–690CrossRef Labella Á, Liu YY, Rodríguez RM, Martínez L (2018) Analyzing the performance of classical consensus models in large scale group decision making: a comparative study. Appl Soft Comput 67:677–690CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Labella Á, Rodríguez RM, Alzahrani AA, Martínez L (2020) A consensus model for extended comparative linguistic expressions with symbolic translation. Mathematics 8(12):2198CrossRef Labella Á, Rodríguez RM, Alzahrani AA, Martínez L (2020) A consensus model for extended comparative linguistic expressions with symbolic translation. Mathematics 8(12):2198CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Li CC, Gao Y, Dong YC (2021) Managing ignorance elements and personalized individual semantics under incomplete linguistic distribution context in group decision making. Group Decis Negotiat 30(1):97–118CrossRef Li CC, Gao Y, Dong YC (2021) Managing ignorance elements and personalized individual semantics under incomplete linguistic distribution context in group decision making. Group Decis Negotiat 30(1):97–118CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Li CC, Rodríguez RM, Martínez L, Dong YC, Herrera F (2019) Consensus building with individual consistency control in group decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 27(2):319–332CrossRef Li CC, Rodríguez RM, Martínez L, Dong YC, Herrera F (2019) Consensus building with individual consistency control in group decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 27(2):319–332CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Liu BS, Zhou Q, Ding RX, Palomares I, Herrera F (2019) Large-scale group decision making model based on social network analysis: trust relationship-based conflict detection and elimination. Eur J Operation Res 275(2):737–754CrossRef Liu BS, Zhou Q, Ding RX, Palomares I, Herrera F (2019) Large-scale group decision making model based on social network analysis: trust relationship-based conflict detection and elimination. Eur J Operation Res 275(2):737–754CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Liu Y, Zhou T, Forrest YL (2020) A multivariate minimum cost consensus model for negotiations of holdout demolition. Group Decis Negotiat 29(5):871–899CrossRef Liu Y, Zhou T, Forrest YL (2020) A multivariate minimum cost consensus model for negotiations of holdout demolition. Group Decis Negotiat 29(5):871–899CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Neumann JV, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton Neumann JV, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Zurück zum Zitat Rodríguez RM, Labella Á, Tré GD, Martínez L (2018) A large scale consensus reaching process managing group hesitation. Knowl-Based Syst 159:86–97CrossRef Rodríguez RM, Labella Á, Tré GD, Martínez L (2018) A large scale consensus reaching process managing group hesitation. Knowl-Based Syst 159:86–97CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Song W, Zhu JJ (2019) Three-reference-point decision-making method with incomplete weight information considering independent and interactive characteristics. Inf Sci 503:148–168CrossRef Song W, Zhu JJ (2019) Three-reference-point decision-making method with incomplete weight information considering independent and interactive characteristics. Inf Sci 503:148–168CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tan X, Zhu JJ, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2021) A cyclic dynamic trust-based consensus model for large-scale group decision making with probabilistic linguistic information. Appl Soft Comput 100(2):106937CrossRef Tan X, Zhu JJ, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2021) A cyclic dynamic trust-based consensus model for large-scale group decision making with probabilistic linguistic information. Appl Soft Comput 100(2):106937CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tversky A, Kahneman D (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291CrossRef Tversky A, Kahneman D (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. J Risk Uncertain 5(4):297–323CrossRef Tversky A, Kahneman D (1992) Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. J Risk Uncertain 5(4):297–323CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wang L, Zhang ZX, Wang YM (2015) A prospect theory-based interval dynamic reference point method for emergency decision making. Expert Syst Appl 42:9379–9388CrossRef Wang L, Zhang ZX, Wang YM (2015) A prospect theory-based interval dynamic reference point method for emergency decision making. Expert Syst Appl 42:9379–9388CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Z, Busemeyer JR (2016) Interference effects of categorization on decision making. Cognition 150:133–149CrossRef Wang Z, Busemeyer JR (2016) Interference effects of categorization on decision making. Cognition 150:133–149CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Z, Solloway T, Shiffrin RM, Busemeyer JR (2014) Context effects produced by question orders reveal quantum nature of human judgments. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(26):9431–9436CrossRef Wang Z, Solloway T, Shiffrin RM, Busemeyer JR (2014) Context effects produced by question orders reveal quantum nature of human judgments. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(26):9431–9436CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wu T, Liu XW, Qin JD, Herrera F (2019) Consensus evolution networks: a consensus reaching tool for managing consensus thresholds in group decision making. Inf Fusion 52:375–388CrossRef Wu T, Liu XW, Qin JD, Herrera F (2019) Consensus evolution networks: a consensus reaching tool for managing consensus thresholds in group decision making. Inf Fusion 52:375–388CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wu YZ, Dong YC, Qin JD, Pedrycz W (2020) Flexible linguistic expressions and consensus reaching with accurate constraints in group decision-making. IEEE Trans Cybernet 50(6):2488–2501CrossRef Wu YZ, Dong YC, Qin JD, Pedrycz W (2020) Flexible linguistic expressions and consensus reaching with accurate constraints in group decision-making. IEEE Trans Cybernet 50(6):2488–2501CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wu YZ, Li CC, Chen X, Dong YC (2018) Group decision making based on linguistic distributions and hesitant assessments: Maximizing the support degree with an accuracy constraint. Inf Fusion 2018(41):151–160CrossRef Wu YZ, Li CC, Chen X, Dong YC (2018) Group decision making based on linguistic distributions and hesitant assessments: Maximizing the support degree with an accuracy constraint. Inf Fusion 2018(41):151–160CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Wu ZB, Xu JP (2018) A consensus model for large-scale group decision making with hesitant fuzzy information and changeable clusters. Inf Fusion 41:217–231CrossRef Wu ZB, Xu JP (2018) A consensus model for large-scale group decision making with hesitant fuzzy information and changeable clusters. Inf Fusion 41:217–231CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Xu WJ, Chen X, Dong YC, Chiclana F (2021) Impact of decision rules and non-cooperative behaviors on minimum consensus cost in group decision making. Group Decis Negotiat 30(6):1239–1260CrossRef Xu WJ, Chen X, Dong YC, Chiclana F (2021) Impact of decision rules and non-cooperative behaviors on minimum consensus cost in group decision making. Group Decis Negotiat 30(6):1239–1260CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Xu WJ, Huang SY, Li J (2018) A novel consensus reaching framework for heterogeneous group decision making based on cumulative prospect theory. Comput Ind Eng 128:325–335CrossRef Xu WJ, Huang SY, Li J (2018) A novel consensus reaching framework for heterogeneous group decision making based on cumulative prospect theory. Comput Ind Eng 128:325–335CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Yukalov VI, Sornette D (2012) Quantum decision theory as quantum theory of measurement. Phys Lett A 372(46):6867–6871CrossRef Yukalov VI, Sornette D (2012) Quantum decision theory as quantum theory of measurement. Phys Lett A 372(46):6867–6871CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I. Inf Sci 8(3):199–249CrossRef Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I. Inf Sci 8(3):199–249CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang BW, Dong YC, Herrera-Viedma E (2019) Group decision making with heterogeneous preference structures: an automatic mechanism to support consensus reaching. Group Decis Negotiat 28:585–617CrossRef Zhang BW, Dong YC, Herrera-Viedma E (2019) Group decision making with heterogeneous preference structures: an automatic mechanism to support consensus reaching. Group Decis Negotiat 28:585–617CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang BW, Liang HM, Gao Y, Zhang GQ (2018) The optimization-based aggregation and consensus with minimum-cost in group decision making under incomplete linguistic distribution context. Knowl-Based Syst 162:92–102CrossRef Zhang BW, Liang HM, Gao Y, Zhang GQ (2018) The optimization-based aggregation and consensus with minimum-cost in group decision making under incomplete linguistic distribution context. Knowl-Based Syst 162:92–102CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang GQ, Dong YC, Xu YF (2014) Consistency and consensus measures for linguistic preference relations based on distribution assessments. Inf Fusion 17:46–55CrossRef Zhang GQ, Dong YC, Xu YF (2014) Consistency and consensus measures for linguistic preference relations based on distribution assessments. Inf Fusion 17:46–55CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang ST, Zhu JJ, Liu XD, Chen Y (2016) Regret theory-based group decision-making with multidimensional preference and incomplete weight information. Inf Fusion 31:1–13CrossRef Zhang ST, Zhu JJ, Liu XD, Chen Y (2016) Regret theory-based group decision-making with multidimensional preference and incomplete weight information. Inf Fusion 31:1–13CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang YX, Xu ZS, Liao HC (2020) A consensus process for group decision making with probabilistic linguistic preference relations. Inf Sci 533:150–168CrossRef Zhang YX, Xu ZS, Liao HC (2020) A consensus process for group decision making with probabilistic linguistic preference relations. Inf Sci 533:150–168CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou XY, Wang LQ, Liao HC, Wang SY, Lev B, Fujita H (2019) A prospect theory-based group decision approach considering consensus for portfolio selection with hesitant fuzzy information. Knowl-Based Syst 168:28–38CrossRef Zhou XY, Wang LQ, Liao HC, Wang SY, Lev B, Fujita H (2019) A prospect theory-based group decision approach considering consensus for portfolio selection with hesitant fuzzy information. Knowl-Based Syst 168:28–38CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu JJ, Ma ZZ, Wang HH, Chen Y (2017) Risk decision-making method using interval numbers and its application based on the prospect value with multiple reference points. Inf Sci 385:415–437CrossRef Zhu JJ, Ma ZZ, Wang HH, Chen Y (2017) Risk decision-making method using interval numbers and its application based on the prospect value with multiple reference points. Inf Sci 385:415–437CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Dynamic Reference Point-Oriented Consensus Mechanism in Linguistic Distribution Group Decision Making Restricted by Quantum Integration of Information
verfasst von
Xiao Tan
Jianjun Zhu
Tong Wu
Publikationsdatum
24.02.2022
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Group Decision and Negotiation / Ausgabe 2/2022
Print ISSN: 0926-2644
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9907
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-022-09775-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2022

Group Decision and Negotiation 2/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Premium Partner