Top

Learning Environments Research

Published in:

10-05-2019 | Original Paper

More than chalkboards: classroom spaces and collaborative learning attitudes

Authors: Virginia Clinton, Nicholas Wilson

Published in: Learning Environments Research | Issue 3/2019

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

The well-known benefits of collaborative learning have prompted the development of active learning classrooms that are designed to facilitate peer interaction. Given the expense of designing active learning classrooms, examining student perceptions of these learning spaces is critical. Furthermore, it is not well understood how the type of classroom (active learning or traditional lecture) relates to students’ perceptions of collaborative learning. In this study, aviation students (N = 46) were enrolled in the same course taught in the same active-learning manner by the same professor, with one section taught in an active-learning classroom and one taught in a traditional lecture classroom. Relative to the traditional lecture classroom, students perceived the active-learning classroom as being much better suited to collaborative learning and having higher levels of collaborative learning, both in terms of enjoyment and usefulness. Implications for designing learning environments and promoting the value of active learning among students are discussed.

previous article A phenomenological exploration of children’s school life and well-being

next article Parental involvement and adolescent school achievement: the mediational role of self-regulated learning

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Adedokun, O. A., Parker, L. C., Henke, J. N., & Burgess, W. D. (2017). Student perceptions of a 21st Century learning space. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(1). http://libjournal.uncg.edu/jls/article/view/1339

Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It’s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.006.CrossRef

Barrett, P., Zhang, Y., Moffat, J., & Kobbacy, K. (2013). A holistic, multi-level analysis identifying the impact of classroom design on pupils’ learning. Building and Environment, 59, 678–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.09.016.CrossRef

Barry, S., Murphy, K., & Drew, S. (2015). From deconstructive misalignment to constructive alignment: Exploring student uses of mobile technologies in university classrooms. Computers & Education, 81(2), 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.014.CrossRef

Beckers, R., van der Voordt, T., & Dewulf, G. (2016). Why do they study there? Diary research into students’ learning space choices in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development, 35(1), 142–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1123230.CrossRef

Beery, T. A., Shell, D., Gillespie, G., & Werdman, E. (2013). The impact of learning space on teaching behaviors. Nurse Education in Practice, 13(5), 382–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2012.11.001.CrossRef

Beichner, R. J. (2006). North Carolina State University: SCALE: UP. In D. G. Oblinger (Ed.), Learning spaces (pp. 29.1–29.6). Educause.

Beichner, R. J. (2014). History and evolution of active learning spaces. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 137, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20081.CrossRef

Bolden, E. C., III, Oestreich, T. M., Kenney, M. J., & Yuhnke, B. T., Jr. (2017). Location, location, location: A comparison of student experience in a lecture hall to a small classroom using similar techniques. Active Learning in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417742018.

Brooks, D. C. (2011). Space matters: The impact of formal learning environments on student learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 719–726. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01098.x.CrossRef

Buchanan, T., & Palmer, E. (2017). Student perceptions of the history lecture: Does this delivery mode have a future in the humanities? Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 14(2), 4. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1152024

Choi, H. H., Van Merriënboer, J. J., & Paas, F. (2014). Effects of the physical environment on cognitive load and learning: Towards a new model of cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 26(2), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9262-6.CrossRef

Cleveland, B., & Fisher, K. (2014). The evaluation of physical learning environments: A critical review of the literature. Learning Environments Research, 17(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-013-9149-3.CrossRef

Clinton, V., & Kelly, A. E. (in-press). Student attitudes toward group discussions. Active Learning in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417740277.

Eccles, J., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J., et al. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153.CrossRef

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., et al. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111.CrossRef

Fung, D. C., To, H., & Leung, K. (2016). The influence of collaborative group work on students’ development of critical thinking: The teacher’s role in facilitating group discussions. Pedagogies An: International Journal, 11(2), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480x.2016.1159965.CrossRef

Gillespie, D., Roos, J., & Slaughter, C. (2006). Undergraduates’ ambivalence about leadership in small groups. The Journal of Excellence in College Teaching, 17(3), 33–49.

Granito, V. J., & Santana, M. E. (2016). Psychology of learning spaces: Impact on teaching and learning. Journal of Learning Spaces, 5(1). http://libjournal.uncg.edu/jls/article/view/882

Han, H., Kiatkawsin, K., Kim, W., & Hong, J. H. (2018). Physical classroom environment and student satisfaction with courses. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(1), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1299855.CrossRef

Hillyard, C., Gillespie, D., & Littig, P. (2010). University students’ attitudes about learning in small groups after frequent participation. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787409355867.CrossRef

Hulleman, C. S., Durik, A. M., Schweigert, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2008). Task values, achievement goals, and interest: An integrative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 398–416. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.398.CrossRef

Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326(5958), 1410–1412. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1177067.CrossRef

Lee, D., Morrone, A. S., & Siering, G. (2018). From swimming pool to collaborative learning studio: Pedagogy, space, and technology in a large active learning classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(1), 95–127.CrossRef

Lee, N., & Tan, S. (2013). Traversing the design-language divide in the design and evaluation of physical learning environments: A trial of visual methods in focus groups. Journal of Learning Spaces, 2(1), 1–7. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1152683

Lobo, G. (2017). Active learning interventions and student perceptions. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 9(3), 465–473. https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-09-2016-0061.CrossRef

Machemer, P. L., & Crawford, P. (2007). Student perceptions of active learning in a large cross-disciplinary classroom. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787407074008.CrossRef

Oblinger, D. (2005). Leading the transition from classrooms to learning spaces. Educause Quarterly, 28(1), 14–18.

Park, E. L., & Choi, B. K. (2014). Transformation of classroom spaces: Traditional versus active learning classroom in colleges. Higher Education, 68(5), 749–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9742-0.CrossRef

Parsons, C. S. (2017). Reforming the environment: The influence of the roundtable classroom design on interactive learning. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(3), 23–33. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1164644

Peberdy, D. (Ed.). 2014. Active learning spaces and technology advances in higher and further education. http://www.wolfvision.com/wolf/Active_Learning

Ramprasad, V., & Subbaiyan, G. (2017). Perceived indoor environmental quality of classrooms and outcomes: A study of a higher education institution in India. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 13(3), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2017.1287050.CrossRef

Rands, M. L., & Gansemer-Topf, A. M. (2017). The room itself is active: How classroom design impacts student engagement. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(1), 26. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1048&context=edu_pubs

Saville, B. K., Zinn, T. E., & Elliot, M. P. (2005). Interteaching vs traditional methods of instruction: A preliminary analysis. Teaching of Psychology, 32(3), 161–163. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top3203_6.CrossRef

Savin-Baden, M., McFarland, L., & Savin-Baden, J. (2008). Learning spaces, agency and notions of improvement: what influences thinking and practice about teaching and learning in higher education? An interpretive meta-ethnography. London Review of Education, 6(3), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460802489355.CrossRef

Sawers, K.M., Wicks, D., Mvududu, N., Seeley, L., & Copeland, R. (2016). What drives student engagement: Is it learning space, instructor behavior, or teaching philosophy. Journal of Learning Spaces, 5(2): 11–12. http://libjournal.uncg.edu/jls/article/view/1247

Seidel, S. B., & Tanner, K. D. (2013). What if students revolt? Considering student resistance: Origins, options, and opportunities for investigation. CBE Life Sciences Education, 12(4), 586–595. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe-13-09-0190.CrossRef

Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Adams, W. K., Wieman, C., Knight, J. K., Guild, N., et al. (2009). Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science, 323(5910), 122–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.05.104.CrossRef

Tharayil, S., Borrego, M., Prince, M., Nguyen, K. A., Shekhar, P., Finelli, C. J., et al. (2018). Strategies to mitigate student resistance to active learning. International Journal of STEM Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0102-y.

Vercellotti, M. L. (2018). Do interactive learning spaces increase student achievement? A comparison of classroom context. Active Learning in Higher Education, 19(3), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417735606.CrossRef

Waite, W. M., Jackson, M. H., Diwan, A., & Leonardi, P. M. (2004). Student culture vs. group work in computer science. In Proceedings of the 34th sigcse technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 12–16). https://doi.org/10.1145/971300.971308

Walczak, M. M., & Van Wylen, D. G. (2013–2014). Tiered classrooms at St. Olaf College: Faculty and student perceptions of three different designs. Journal of Learning Spaces, 2(2), 2013–2014. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1152685

Walker, J. D., & Baepler, P. (2017). Measuring social relations in new classroom spaces: Development and validation of the Social Context and Learning Environments (SCALE) survey. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(3), 34–41. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1164634

Weinstein, C. S. (1979). The physical environment of the school: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 49(4), 577–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/1169986.CrossRef

Whiteside, A., Brooks, D. C., & Walker, J. D. (2010). Making the case for space: Three years of empirical research on learning environments. Educause Quarterly, 33(3). https://er.educause.edu/about/eq-archives

Yang, Z., Becerik-Gerber, B., & Mino, L. (2013). A study on student perceptions of higher education classrooms: Impact of classroom attributes on student satisfaction and performance. Building and Environment, 70, 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.08.030.CrossRef

Title: More than chalkboards: classroom spaces and collaborative learning attitudes
Authors: Virginia Clinton
Nicholas Wilson
Publication date: 10-05-2019
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: Learning Environments Research / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1387-1579
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1855
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09287-w

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Students’ perceptions of mathematics classroom learning environments: measurement and associations with achievement

Differentiation as measured by the Classroom Practices Survey: a validity study updating the original instrument

A phenomenological exploration of children’s school life and well-being

Assessing students’ perceptions of their learning environment in science classes in the United Arab Emirates

Equity in access? The number of the books available in grade 1, 3 and 5 classroom libraries

Educating for innovation: students’ perceptions of the learning environment and of their own innovation competence