Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Population and Environment
Published in: Population and Environment 1/2021

16-03-2021 | Original Paper

No future, no kids–no kids, no future?

An exploration of motivations to remain childfree in times of climate change

Authors: Sabrina Helm, Joya A. Kemper, Samantha K. White

Published in: Population and Environment | Issue 1/2021

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Individuals around the world believe global climate change is a major threat, with media attention and polling suggesting young adults may decide to go childfree as a result. Yet, there is limited research on the link between environmental concern and reproductive attitudes. The purpose of this research was to explore how climate change-related concerns affect reproductive attitudes and motivations to remain childfree. Two studies were conducted: study 1 consisted of a content analysis of reader comments on articles discussing going childfree in response to climate change, and study 2 featured semi-structured interviews conducted in New Zealand and the USA. The impact of future children on the planet, in the context of overpopulation and overconsumption, was a major theme in both studies. Perspectives of doom and hope emerged simultaneously, indicating how climate anxiety influences reproductive attitudes. Study findings point at implications for public policy makers regarding this largely neglected perspective on climate change adaptation and mitigation and potential psychological and societal effects.
previous article Rising seas, immobilities, and translocality in small island states: case studies from Fiji and Tuvalu

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Footnotes
1
‘Childless’ refers to individuals who desire to be parents but are unable to, ‘childfree’ indicates individuals who choose to not procreate even though they have the ability to do so and is a result of socio-cultural shifts in social norms and personal values (Blackstone & Stewart, 2016).
 
2
Researchers influenced by positivist or postpositivist philosophies believe triangulation overcomes the limitations to only using one approach to research, providing a means to verify the findings of different methods (Salkind, 2010). Conversely, researchers influenced by a constructivist philosophy believe the benefits of triangulation are in its ability to provide multiple viewpoints on the phenomenon of interest and deepen the understanding of the research question (Salkind, 2010).
 
Literature
Adler, M. A. (1997). Social change and declines in marriage and fertility in Eastern Germany. Journal of Marriage and Family, 59(1), 37–49.CrossRef
Aitken, C., Chapman, R., & McClure, J. (2011). Climate change, powerlessness and the commons dilemma: Assessing New Zealanders’ preparedness to act. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 752–760.CrossRef
Ajzen, I., & Klobas, J. (2013). Fertility intentions: An approach based on the theory of planned behavior. Demographic Research, 29, 203–232.CrossRef
Andrijevic, M., & Striessnig, E. (2017). Less Feet, Less Footprint: The Relationship Between Environmental Concern and Fertility Intentions. Paper presented at the International Population Conference, Cape Town, South Africa
Arnocky, S., Dupuis, D., & Stroink, M. L. (2012). Environmental concern and fertility intentions among Canadian university students. Population and Environment, 34(2), 279–292.CrossRef
Basten, S., Lutz, W., & Scherbov, S. (2013). Very long range global population scenarios to 2300 and the implications of sustained low fertility. Demographic Research, 28, 1145–1166.CrossRef
Bergen, N., & Labonté, R. (2020). “Everything is perfect, and we have no problems”: Detecting and limiting social desirability bias in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 30(5), 783–792.CrossRef
Berry, H. L., Bowen, K., & Kjellstrom, T. (2010). Climate change and mental health: a causal pathways framework. International Journal of Public Health, 55(2), 123–132.CrossRef
Blackstone, A. (2014). Doing family without having kids. Sociology Compass, 8(1), 52–62.CrossRef
Blackstone, A. (2019). Childfree by choice: The movement redefining family and creating a new age of independence. Dutton.
Blackstone, A., & Stewart, M. D. (2012). Choosing to be childfree: Research on the decision not to parent. Sociology Compass, 6(9), 718–727.CrossRef
Blackstone, A., & Stewart, M. D. (2016). “There’s more thinking to decide” how the childfree decide not to parent. The Family Journal, 24(3), 296–303.CrossRef
Bradatan, C., & Firebaugh, G. (2007). History, population policies, and fertility decline in eastern Europe: A case study. Journal of Family History, 32(2), 179–192.CrossRef
Brauner-Otto, S. R. (2014). Environmental quality and fertility: the effects of plant density, species richness, and plant diversity on fertility limitation. Population and Environment, 36(1), 1–31.CrossRef
Brauner-Otto, S. R., & Axinn, W. G. (2017). Natural resource collection and desired family size: a longitudinal test of environment-population theories. Population and Environment, 38(4), 381–406.CrossRef
Cain, M. (1983). Fertility as an adjustment to risk. Population Development Review, 9(4), 688–702.CrossRef
Caldwell, J. C. (1982). Theory of fertility decline. Academic Press.
Clayton, S., & Karazsia, B. T. (2020). Development and validation of a measure of climate change anxiety. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 101434.
Collins, L., & Nerlich, B. (2015). Examining user comments for deliberative democracy: A corpus-driven analysis of the climate change debate online. Environmental Communication, 9(2), 189–207.CrossRef
Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124–130.CrossRef
Dasgupta, P. (1993). An inquiry into well-being and destitution. Oxford University Press.
Davis, A. C., Arnocky, S., & Stroink, M. (2019). The problem of overpopulation: Proenvironmental concerns and behavior predict reproductive attitudes. Ecopsychology, 11(2), 92–100.CrossRef
De Kraker, J., Kuijs, S., Cörvers, R., & Offermans, A. (2014). Internet public opinion on climate change: a world views analysis of online reader comments. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 6(1), 19–33.CrossRef
De Rose, A., & Testa, M. R. (2015a). Climate change and reproductive intentions in Europe. In D. Strangio & G. Sancetta (Eds.), Italy in a European Context (pp. 194-212). Palgrave Macmillan.
De Rose, A., & Testa, M. R. (2015b). The ecological awareness and fear for climate change in Euope. Annali del Dipartimento di Metodi e Modelli per l’Economia, 113-135.
Fahlén, S., & Oláh, L. (2015). The impact of economic uncertainty on childbearing intentions in Europe. Families and Societies: Working Paper Series, 36.
Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92.CrossRef
Francis, J. J., Johnston, M., Robertson, C., Glidewell, L., Entwistle, V., Eccles, M. P., & Grimshaw, J. M. (2010). What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychology and Health, 25(10), 1229–1245.CrossRef
Ghimire, D. J., & Mohai, P. (2005). Environmentalism and contraceptive use: How people in less developed settings approach environmental Issues. Population and Environment, 27(1), 29–61.CrossRef
Gifford, R., & Sussman, R. (2012). Environmental attitudes. In S. D. Clayton (Ed.), Oxford library of psychology: The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (p. 65-80). Oxford University Press.
Gillespie, R. (2000). When no means no: Disbelief, disregard and deviance as discourses of voluntary childlessness. Women’s Studies International Forum, 23(2), 223–234.CrossRef
Grbich, C. (2012). Qualitative data analysis: an introduction. Sage.
Gregory-Smith, D., Smith, A., & Winklhofer, H. (2013). Emotions and dissonance in “ethical” consumption choices. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(11–12), 1201–1223.CrossRef
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough?: An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82.CrossRef
Guion, L. A., Diehl, D. C., & McDonald, D. (2011). Triangulation: Establishing the validity of qualitative studies. EDIS, 2011(8), 3–3.CrossRef
Hayes, K., & Poland, B. (2018). Addressing mental health in a changing climate: Incorporating mental health indicators into climate change and health vulnerability and adaptation assessments. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(9), 1806.CrossRef
Heer, B., Polito, V., & Wickens, M. R. (2020). Population aging, social security and fiscal limits. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 116, 103913.CrossRef
Helm, S. V., Pollitt, A., Barnett, M. A., Curran, M. A., & Craig, Z. R. (2018). Differentiating environmental concern in the context of psychological adaption to climate change. Global Environmental Change, 48, 158–167.CrossRef
Henrich, N., & Holmes, B. (2013). Web news readers comments: Towards developing a methodology for using on-line comments in social inquiry. Journal of Media and Communication studies, 5(1), 1–4.
Janetzko, D. (2008). Nonreactive data collection. In N.G. Fielding, R.M. Lee & G, Blank, The SAGE handbook of online research methods (Eds.), 161-173.
Johnson, P. (1990). Our ageing population – The implications for business and government. Long Range Planning, 23(2), 55–62.CrossRef
Kolbe, R. H., & Burnett, M. S. (1991). Content-analysis research: An examination of applications with directives for improving research reliability and objectivity. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(2), 243–250.CrossRef
Kuzel, A. (1992). Sampling in qualitative inquiry. In B. Crabtree & W. Miller (Eds.), Doing Qualitative Research (pp. 31–44). Sage.
Landry, N., Gifford, R., Milfont, T. L., Weeks, A., & Arnocky, S. (2018). Learned helplessness moderates the relationship between environmental concern and behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 55, 18–22.CrossRef
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications Ltd.CrossRef
Lindberg, L. D., & Kost, K. (2014). Exploring US men’s birth intentions. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 18(3), 625–633.CrossRef
Malhotra, N. K. (2010). Marketing Research: An applied orientation. Prentice Hall.CrossRef
Merz, E.-M. (2012). Fertility intentions depend on intergenerational relations: A life course perspective. Family Science, 3(3–4), 237–245.CrossRef
Miettinen, A., & Szalma, I. (2014). Childlessness intentions and ideals in Europe. Finnish Yearbook of Population Research, 49, 31–55.CrossRef
Murtaugh, P. A., & Schlax, M. G. (2009). Reproduction and the carbon legacies of individuals. Global Environmental Change, 19(1), 14–20.CrossRef
O’Neill, B. C., & Wexler, L. (2000). The greenhouse externality to childbearing: A sensitivity analysis. Climactic Change, 47, 283–324.CrossRef
Ojala, M., & Bengtsson, H. (2019). Young people’s coping strategies concerning climate change: Relations to perceived communication with parents and friends and proenvironmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 51(8), 907–935.CrossRef
Park, K. (2002). Stigma management among the voluntarily childless. Sociological Perspectives, 45, 21–45.CrossRef
Pimentel, D., Harman, R., Pacenza, M., Pecarsky, J., & Pimentel, M. (1994). Natural resources and an optimum human population. Population and Environment, 15(5), 347–369.CrossRef
Rowland, D. T. (2007). Historical trends in childlessness. Journal of Family Issues, 28(10), 1211–1337.CrossRef
Salkind, N. J. (2010). Triangulation. In N. J Salkind (Eds.), Encyclopedia of research design (Vol. 1). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Salomon, E., Preston, J. L., & Tannenbaum, M. B. (2017). Climate change helplessness and the (de) moralization of individual energy behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 23(1), 15.
Sasson, I., & Weinreb, A. (2017). Land cover change and fertility in West-Central Africa: rural livelihoods and the vicious circle model. Population and Environment, 38(4), 345–368.CrossRef
Satterthwaite, D. (2009). The implications of population growth and urbanization for climate change. Environment and Urbanization, 21(2), 545–567.CrossRef
Schuth, A., Marx, M., & De Rijke, M. (2007). Extracting the discussion structure in comments on news-articles. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 9th annual ACM international workshop on Web information and data management.
Stebbins, R. A. (2001). What is exploration?. In RA. Stebbins, Exploratory research in the social sciences (pp. 2-17). SAGE Publications, Inc
Stern, N. (2008). The economics of climate change. American Economic Review, 98(2), 1–37.CrossRef
Taylor, C. A., Al-Hiyari, R., Lee, S. J., Priebe, A., Guerrero, L. W., & Bales, A. (2016). Beliefs and ideologies linked with approval of corporal punishment: a content analysis of online comments. Health Education Research, 31(4), 563–575.CrossRef
Thévenon, O. (2011). Family policies in OECD Countries: A comparative analysis. Population and Development Review, 37(1), 57–87.CrossRef
Thurmond, V. (2001). The point of triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(3), 254–256.CrossRef
van Basshuysen, P., & Brandstedt, E. (2018). Comment on ‘The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions’. Environmental Research Letters, 13(4)
Wynes, S., & Nicholas, K. A. (2017). The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions. Environmental Research Letters, 12(7), 074024.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
No future, no kids–no kids, no future?
An exploration of motivations to remain childfree in times of climate change
Authors
Sabrina Helm
Joya A. Kemper
Samantha K. White
Publication date
16-03-2021
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Population and Environment / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0199-0039
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7810
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-021-00379-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Population and Environment 1/2021 Go to the issue

Original Paper

Rising seas, immobilities, and translocality in small island states: case studies from Fiji and Tuvalu

Original Paper

Climate anomalies and childhood growth in Peru

Review Article

Scales and sensitivities in climate vulnerability, displacement, and health

Original Paper

Population living on permafrost in the Arctic

Original Paper

Disentangling the relationship between immigration and environmental emissions