Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Neural Computing and Applications 7/2020

15-12-2018 | Original Article

Nuclear Fission–Nuclear Fusion algorithm for global optimization: a modified Big Bang–Big Crunch algorithm

Authors: Yagizer Yalcin, Onur Pekcan

Published in: Neural Computing and Applications | Issue 7/2020

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This study introduces a derivative of the well-known optimization algorithm, Big Bang–Big Crunch (BB–BC), named Nuclear Fission–Nuclear Fusion-based BB–BC, simply referred to as N2F. Broadly preferred in the engineering optimization community, BB–BC provides accurate solutions with reasonably fast convergence rates for many engineering problems. Regardless, the algorithm often suffers from stagnation issues. More specifically, for some problems, BB–BC either converges prematurely or exploits the promising regions inefficiently, both of which prevent obtaining the optimal solution. To overcome such problems, N2F algorithm is proposed, inspired by two major phenomena of nuclear physics: fission and fusion reactions. In N2F, two concepts named “Nuclear Fission” and “Nuclear Fusion” are introduced, replacing the “Big Bang” and “Big Crunch” phases of BB–BC, respectively. With the “Nuclear Fission” phase represented through a parameter named amplification factor, premature convergence issues are eliminated to a great extent. Meanwhile, convergence rate and exploitation capability of the algorithm are enhanced largely through a precision control parameter named magnification factor, in the “Nuclear Fusion” phase. The performance of N2F algorithm is investigated through unconstrained test functions and compared with the conventional BB–BC and other metaheuristics including genetic algorithm, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Artificial Bee Colony Optimization (ABC), Drone Squadron Optimization (DSO) and Salp Swarm Algorithm (SSA). Then, further analyses are performed with constrained design benchmarks, validating the applicability of N2F to engineering problems. With superior statistical performance compared to BB–BC, GA, PSO, ABC, DSO and SSA in unconstrained problems and improved results with respect to the literature studies, N2F is proven to be an efficient and robust optimization algorithm.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Rao RV, Savsani VJ (2012) Mechanical design optimization using advanced optimization techniques. Springer, LondonCrossRef Rao RV, Savsani VJ (2012) Mechanical design optimization using advanced optimization techniques. Springer, LondonCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Dréo J, Pétrowski A, Siarry P (2006) Metaheuristics for hard optimization: methods and case studies. Springer, BerlinMATH Dréo J, Pétrowski A, Siarry P (2006) Metaheuristics for hard optimization: methods and case studies. Springer, BerlinMATH
10.
go back to reference Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems—an introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. The University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborMATH Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems—an introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. The University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborMATH
15.
16.
go back to reference Karaboga D (2005) An idea based on honey bee swarm for numerical optimization. Technical Report-TR06. Erciyes University, Engineering Faculty, Computer Engineering Department Karaboga D (2005) An idea based on honey bee swarm for numerical optimization. Technical Report-TR06. Erciyes University, Engineering Faculty, Computer Engineering Department
31.
35.
go back to reference Kazemzadeh Azad S, Hasançebi O, Erol OK (2011) Evaluating efficiency of big-bang big-crunch algorithm in benchmark engineering optimization problems. Int J Optim Civ Eng 3:495–505 Kazemzadeh Azad S, Hasançebi O, Erol OK (2011) Evaluating efficiency of big-bang big-crunch algorithm in benchmark engineering optimization problems. Int J Optim Civ Eng 3:495–505
44.
go back to reference Luo FL, Ye H (2013) Renewable energy systems: advanced conversion technologies and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton Luo FL, Ye H (2013) Renewable energy systems: advanced conversion technologies and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton
45.
go back to reference Das A, Ferbel T (1994) Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics. John Wiley & Sons Inc, New YorkMATH Das A, Ferbel T (1994) Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics. John Wiley & Sons Inc, New YorkMATH
46.
48.
go back to reference Liang JJ, Qu BY, Suganthan PN (2013) Problem definitions and evaluation criteria for the CEC 2015 competition on learning-based real-parameter single objective optimization. Zhengzhou University, Technical report Liang JJ, Qu BY, Suganthan PN (2013) Problem definitions and evaluation criteria for the CEC 2015 competition on learning-based real-parameter single objective optimization. Zhengzhou University, Technical report
58.
go back to reference Rao SS (2009) Engineering optimization: theory and practice. Wiley, New JerseyCrossRef Rao SS (2009) Engineering optimization: theory and practice. Wiley, New JerseyCrossRef
74.
go back to reference Gold S, Krishnamurty S (1997) Trade-offs in robust engineering design. In: Proceedings of the 1997 ASME design engineering technical conferences, Sacramento, California, pp 14–17 Gold S, Krishnamurty S (1997) Trade-offs in robust engineering design. In: Proceedings of the 1997 ASME design engineering technical conferences, Sacramento, California, pp 14–17
76.
go back to reference Thanedar PB, Vanderplaats GN (1995) Survey of discrete variable optimization for structural design. J Struct Eng 121(2):301–306CrossRef Thanedar PB, Vanderplaats GN (1995) Survey of discrete variable optimization for structural design. J Struct Eng 121(2):301–306CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Nuclear Fission–Nuclear Fusion algorithm for global optimization: a modified Big Bang–Big Crunch algorithm
Authors
Yagizer Yalcin
Onur Pekcan
Publication date
15-12-2018
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Neural Computing and Applications / Issue 7/2020
Print ISSN: 0941-0643
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3907-1

Other articles of this Issue 7/2020

Neural Computing and Applications 7/2020 Go to the issue

Premium Partner