Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Inequalities and Applications 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

On Frame’s inequalities

Author: Ling Zhu

Published in: Journal of Inequalities and Applications | Issue 1/2018

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
download
DOWNLOAD
print
PRINT
insite
SEARCH
loading …

Abstract

In this paper, the errors of the two inequalities in Theorem 3.4.20 in the classic “Analytic Inequalities” by Mitrinovic are corrected, and the corresponding inequalities for circular functions and hyperbolic functions are rebuilt.
Notes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

1 Introduction

The classic “Analytic Inequalities” by Mitrinovic [1] has been hailed all over the world since it was published in 1970. The influence of this book on the various branches of mathematics cannot be overestimated and will last forever. As the author says in the introduction of his book, “The greater part of the results included have been checked, although this could not, of course, be done for all the results which appear in the book. We hope, however, that there are not many errors, but the very nature of this book is such that it seems impossible to expect it to be entirely free of them.” I find some errors in “Analytic Inequalities” and announce the specific contents.
The following conclusions are on p. 241 in [1].
Proposition 1
([1, Theorem 3.4.20])
For every \(t>0\),
$$\begin{aligned}& t-\frac{3\sin t}{2+\cos t}< \frac{1}{180}t^{5}, \end{aligned}$$
(1.1)
$$\begin{aligned}& t-\frac{3\sin t}{2+\cos t} \biggl( 1+ \frac{(1-\cos t)^{2}}{9(3+2\cos t)} \biggr) < \frac{t^{7}}{2100}. \end{aligned}$$
(1.2)
It is not difficult to find that these two inequalities above on the common interval \((0,\pi /2)\) are wrong. I read carefully the only one citation [2] by Frame in [1] for Theorem 3.4.20, which was published in the 1944 issue of “The American Mathematical Monthly” in the form of the report of the Mathematical Seminar. We judge that the object of Frame [2] is a right triangle, so the t must be the other two acute angles of a right triangle, that is, \(t\in (0,\pi /2)\). We can only find the related contents of (1.1) in [2] is the item “(7)”, but the one (1.2) at least did not appear in [2].
By using the analytic method, this paper has come to the corresponding conclusions of (1.1) and (1.2); specifically, these are, in the form of (1.1) and (1.2), the first of two inequalities holds for hyperbolic functions, while the second one must be reconstructed, and reversely for circular functions on the interval \((0,\pi )\).
Theorem 1
Let \(x\in (0,\pi )\). Then
$$ x-\frac{3\sin x}{2+\cos x}> \frac{1}{180}x^{5} $$
(1.3)
and
$$ x-\frac{3\sin x}{2+\cos x} \biggl( 1+ \frac{(1-\cos x)^{2}}{9(3+2\cos x)} \biggr) >\frac{x^{7}}{2100} $$
(1.4)
hold, \(1/180\) and \(1/2100\) are the best constants in (1.3) and (1.4), respectively.
Theorem 2
Let \(x>0\). Then
$$ x-\frac{3\sinh x}{2+\cosh x}< \frac{1}{180}x^{5} $$
(1.5)
and
$$ x-\frac{3\sinh x}{2+\cosh x} \biggl( 1+\frac{(1-\cosh x)^{2}}{9(3+2 \cosh x)} \biggr) < - \bigl( 9.537610179\cdot 10^{-5} \bigr) x^{7} $$
(1.6)
hold, where \(1/180\) is the best constant in (1.5).

2 Lemmas

Lemma 1
(Mitrinovic–Adamovic inequality [3])
The inequality
$$ \biggl( \frac{\sin t}{t} \biggr) ^{3}>\cos t $$
(2.1)
holds for all \(t\in (0,\pi /2)\), and the exponent 3 is best possible.
Lemma 2
(Lazarevic’s inequality [4])
Let \(t\neq 0\). Then
$$ \biggl( \frac{\sinh t}{t} \biggr) ^{3}>\cosh t $$
(2.2)
holds, and the exponent 3 is best possible.
Lemma 3
([5])
Let \(\vert x\vert <\pi \), and \(B_{2n}\) be the even-indexed Bernoulli numbers (see [6]), we have the following power series expansion:
$$ \frac{1}{\sin x}=\frac{1}{x}+\sum_{n=1}^{\infty } \frac{2^{2n}-2}{ ( 2n ) !}\vert B_{2n} \vert x^{2n-1}.$$
(2.3)
Lemma 4
([7])
Let \(a_{n}\) and \(b_{n}\) (\(n=0,1,2,\ldots\)) be real numbers, and let the power series \(A(t)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty }a_{n}t^{n}\) and \(B(t)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty }b_{n}t^{n}\) be convergent for \(\vert t\vert < R\) (\(R\leq +\infty \)). If \(b_{n}>0\) for \(n=0,1,2,\ldots\) , and if \(\varepsilon_{n}=a_{n}/b_{n}\) is strictly increasing (or decreasing) for \(n=0,1,2,\ldots\) , then the function \(A(t)/B(t)\) is strictly increasing (or decreasing) on \((0,R)\) (\(R\leq +\infty \)).
Lemma 5
([8])
Let \(B_{2n}\) be the even-indexed Bernoulli numbers. Then the double inequality
$$ \frac{\pi^{2}(2^{2n+2}-1)}{(2n+2)(2n+1)(2^{2n}-1)}< \frac{\vert B _{2n}\vert }{\vert B_{2n+2}\vert }< \frac{\pi^{2}(2^{2n+1}-1)}{(2n+2)(2n+1)(2^{2n-1}-1)} $$
(2.4)
holds for \(n=1,2,\ldots \) .
Lemma 6
Let \(B_{2n}\) be the even-indexed Bernoulli numbers. Then the series
$$ \{ \delta_{n} \} = \biggl\{ \frac{n(2^{2n+2}-2)\vert B_{2n+2} \vert }{(2n+2)(2^{2n}-2)\vert B_{2n} \vert } \biggr\} $$
(2.5)
is increasing for \(n\geq 1\).
Proof
By Lemma 5 we have
$$\begin{aligned}& \begin{aligned} \delta_{n-1} &= \frac{(n-1)(2^{2n}-2)\vert B_{2n} \vert }{(2n)(2^{2n-2}-2)\vert B_{2n-2} \vert } \\ &< \frac{(n-1)(2^{2n}-2)}{(2n)(2^{2n-2}-2)}\frac{(2n)(2n-1)(2^{2n-2}-1)}{\pi^{2}(2^{2n}-1)}, \end{aligned} \\& \begin{aligned} \delta_{n} &= \frac{n(2^{2n+2}-2)\vert B_{2n+2} \vert }{(2n+2)(2^{2n}-2)\vert B_{2n} \vert } \\ &>\frac{n(2^{2n+2}-2)}{(2n+2)(2^{2n}-2)}\frac{(2n+2)(2n+1)(2^{2n-1}-1)}{ \pi^{2}(2^{2n+1}-1)}. \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$
In order to prove \(c_{n-1}< c_{n}\) for \(n\geq 2\) it suffices to show
$$\begin{aligned} &\frac{n(2^{2n+2}-2)}{(2n+2)(2^{2n}-2)}\frac{(2n+2)(2n+1)(2^{2n-1}-1)}{ \pi^{2}(2^{2n+1}-1)} \\ &\quad >\frac{(n-1)(2^{2n}-2)}{(2n)(2^{2n-2}-2)}\frac{(2n)(2n-1)(2^{2n-2}-1)}{ \pi^{2}(2^{2n}-1)}, \end{aligned}$$
that is,
$$ 2n(2n+1) \bigl(2^{2n}-8\bigr) \bigl(2^{2n}-1\bigr)>(2n-2) (2n-1) \bigl(2^{2n}-4\bigr) \bigl(2^{2n}-2\bigr). $$
(2.6)
Let \(2n=m\). Then, for \(m\geq 4\), we show
$$ m(m+1) \bigl(2^{m}-8\bigr) \bigl(2^{m}-1\bigr)>(m-2) (m-1) \bigl(2^{m}-4\bigr) \bigl(2^{m}-2\bigr). $$
(2.7)
Let
$$\begin{aligned}& u_{m} =m(m+1) \bigl(2^{m}-8\bigr) \bigl(2^{m}-1 \bigr)-(m-2) (m-1) \bigl(2^{m}-4\bigr) \bigl(2^{m}-2\bigr) \\& \hphantom{u_{m}}=2 (2m-1)2^{2m}-\bigl(3m^{2}+27m-12 \bigr)2^{m}+32m- 16, \\& v_{m} =2\cdot 2^{m}-\frac{3m^{2}+27m-12}{2m-1}. \end{aligned}$$
Then
$$\begin{aligned} u_{m} &>2 (2m-1)2^{2m}-\bigl(3m^{2}+27m-12 \bigr)2^{m} \\ &= (2m-1)2^{m}v_{m} \end{aligned}$$
(2.8)
and
$$ v_{m+1}-2v_{m}= 3\cdot \frac{17m^{2}+2m^{3}+m-2}{ ( 2m-1 ) ( 2m+1 ) }>0 $$
(2.9)
for \(m\geq 4\).
It follows from (2.9) and \(v_{4}=80/7>0\) that \(v_{m}>0\) for \(m\geq 4\). Therefore, Lemma 6 follows from (2.6), (2.7) and (2.8). □
Lemma 7
The function
$$ K(t)=\frac{t^{3}-\sin^{3}t}{t^{3}\sin^{2}t} $$
is increasing on \((0,\pi )\). In particular, we have
(i)
The double inequality
$$ 1-\frac{\pi^{3}-8}{\pi^{3}}\sin^{2}t< \biggl( \frac{\sin t}{t} \biggr) ^{3}< 1-\frac{1}{2}\sin^{2}t $$
(2.10)
holds for all \(t\in (0,\pi /2)\), the constants \((\pi^{3}-8)/\pi^{3}\) and \(1/2\) are best possible.
 
(ii)
The inequality
$$ \biggl( \frac{\sin t}{t} \biggr) ^{3}< 1-\frac{\pi^{3}-8}{\pi^{3}}\sin ^{2}t $$
(2.11)
holds for all \(t\in (\pi /2,\pi )\), and the constant \((\pi^{3}-8)/\pi ^{3}\) is best possible.
 
Proof
Let
$$ K(t)=\frac{t^{3}-\sin^{3}t}{t^{3}\sin^{2}t}=\frac{ ( \frac{t}{ \sin t} ) ^{3}-1}{\frac{t^{3}}{\sin t}}:=\frac{A(t)}{B(t)},\quad 0< t< \pi . $$
Then by (2.3) we obtain
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{\sin^{3}t} &=\frac{1}{\sin t}+\frac{1}{2} \biggl( \frac{1}{ \sin t} \biggr) ^{\prime \prime } \\ &=\frac{1}{t}+\sum_{n=1}^{\infty } \frac{2^{2n}-2}{ ( 2n ) !}\vert B_{2n} \vert t^{2n-1} \\ &\quad {}+\frac{1}{t^{3}}+\sum_{n=2}^{\infty } \frac{(2^{2n}-2)(2n-1)(n-1)}{ ( 2n ) !}\vert B_{2n} \vert t^{2n-3} \end{aligned}$$
and
$$\begin{aligned}& \begin{aligned} A(t) &=t^{3} \Biggl( \frac{1}{t}+\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }\frac{2^{2n}-2}{ ( 2n ) !}\vert B_{2n} \vert t^{2n-1} \Biggr) -1 \\ &\quad {}+t^{3} \Biggl( \frac{1}{t^{3}}+\sum_{n=2}^{\infty } \frac{(2^{2n}-2)(2n-1)(n-1)}{ ( 2n ) !}\vert B_{2n} \vert t^{2n-3} \Biggr) \\ &=t^{2}+\sum_{n=1}^{\infty } \biggl[ \frac{(2^{2n}-2)\vert B_{2n} \vert }{ ( 2n ) !}+ \frac{(2^{2n+2}-2)(2n+1)n\vert B_{2n+2} \vert }{ ( 2n+2 ) !} \biggr] t ^{2n+2} \\ &:=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty }a_{n}t^{2n+2}, \end{aligned} \\& \begin{aligned} B(t) &=t^{3} \Biggl( \frac{1}{t}+\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }\frac{2^{2n}-2}{ ( 2n ) !}\vert B_{2n} \vert t^{2n-1} \Biggr) =t^{2}+\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }\frac{(2^{2n}-2)\vert B_{2n} \vert }{ ( 2n ) !}t^{2n+2} \\ &:=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty }b_{n}t^{2n+2}, \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$
where
$$\begin{aligned}& a_{0} = 1,\qquad a_{n}=\frac{(2^{2n}-2)\vert B_{2n} \vert }{ ( 2n ) !}+\frac{(2^{2n+2}-2)(2n+1)n\vert B_{2n+2} \vert }{ ( 2n+2 ) !}, \\& b_{0} = 1,\qquad b_{n}=\frac{(2^{2n}-2)\vert B_{2n} \vert }{ ( 2n ) !}>0,\quad n \geq 1. \end{aligned}$$
Since
$$ \frac{a_{0}}{b_{0}}=1,\qquad \frac{a_{n}}{b_{n}}=1+\frac{n(2^{2n+2}-2)\vert B_{2n+2} \vert }{(2n+2)(2^{2n}-2)\vert B_{2n} \vert }=1+ \delta_{n},\quad n\geq 1, $$
we know \(a_{0}/b_{0}< a_{1}/b_{1}\), and \(\{ a_{n}/b_{n} \} _{n\geq 1}\) is increasing by Lemma 6. So \(\{ a_{n}/b_{n} \} _{n\geq 0}\) is increasing, and \(K(t)=A(t)/B(t)\) is increasing on \((0,\pi )\) by Lemma 4. In view of
$$ K\bigl(0^{+}\bigr)=\frac{1}{2},\qquad K \biggl( \frac{\pi }{2} \biggr) =\frac{\pi^{3}-8}{ \pi^{3}},\qquad K\bigl(\pi^{-}\bigr)=+\infty, $$
this completes the proof of Lemma 6. □
In order to prove (1.6), we need the following lemmas. We introduce a useful auxiliary function \(H_{f,g}\). For \(-\infty \leq a< b\leq \infty \), let f and g be differentiable on \((a,b)\) and \(g^{\prime }\neq 0\) on \((a,b)\). Then the function \(H_{f,g}\) is defined by
$$ H_{f,g}:=\frac{f^{\prime }}{g^{\prime }}g-f. $$
The function \(H_{f,g}\) has some good properties and plays an important role in the proof of a monotonicity criterion for the quotient of power series.
Lemma 8
([9])
Let \(C ( t ) =\sum_{k=0}^{\infty }c_{k}t^{k}\) and \(D ( t ) =\sum_{k=0}^{\infty }d_{k}t^{k}\) be two real power series converging on \(( -r,r ) \) (\(r\leq +\infty \)) and \(d_{k}>0\) for all k. Suppose that, for certain \(m\in \mathbb{N} \), the non-constant sequence \(\{ a_{k}/b_{k} \} \) is increasing (resp. decreasing) for \(0\leq k\leq m\) and decreasing (resp. increasing) for \(k\geq m\). Then the function \(C/D\) is strictly increasing (resp. decreasing) on \(( 0,r ) \) if and only if \(H_{C,D} ( r^{-} ) \geq \) (resp. ≤) 0. Moreover, if \(H_{C,D} ( r^{-} ) <\) (resp. >) 0, then there exists \(t_{0}\in ( 0,r ) \) such that the function \(C/D\) is strictly increasing (resp. decreasing) on \(( 0,t_{0} ) \) and strictly decreasing (resp. increasing) on \(( t_{0},r ) \).
Lemma 9
Let
$$ L(t)=\frac{\sinh^{3}t-t^{3}}{t^{3}\sinh^{2}t},\quad t>0, $$
Then the function \(L(t)\) has a minimum point \(t_{0}=2.72078\ldots \) , and
$$ \frac{\sinh^{3}t-t^{3}}{t^{3}\sinh^{2}t}\geq L(t_{0})=0.35803\ldots :=\theta . $$
In particular, we see that the double inequality
$$ \biggl( \frac{\sinh t}{t} \biggr) ^{3}\geq 1+\theta \sinh^{2}t $$
(2.12)
holds for all \(t\in (0,+\infty )\), the constant θ is best possible.
Proof
Let
$$ L(t)=\frac{ ( \frac{\sinh t}{t} ) ^{3}-1}{\sinh^{2}t}=\frac{ \sinh^{3}t-t^{3}}{t^{3}\sinh^{2}t}:=\frac{C(t)}{D(t)},\quad 0< t< +\infty . $$
Then by using the infinite series of sinhx and coshx we obtain
$$\begin{aligned}& C(t) =\sinh^{3}t-t^{3}=\frac{1}{4} ( \sinh 3t-3 \sinh t ) -t ^{3}=\sum_{n=2}^{\infty }\frac{3^{2n+1}-3}{4 ( 2n+1 ) !}t^{2n+1}:= \sum_{n=2}^{\infty }c_{n}t^{2n+1} \end{aligned}$$
and
$$\begin{aligned} D(t) =&t^{3}\sinh^{2}t=\frac{1}{2} ( \cosh 2t-1 ) t^{3} \\ =&\sum_{n=2}^{\infty }\frac{2^{2n-3}}{ ( 2n-2 ) !}t^{2n+1}:= \sum_{n=2}^{\infty }d_{n}t^{2n+1}, \end{aligned}$$
where
$$ c_{n}=\frac{3^{2n+1}-3}{4 ( 2n+1 ) !},\qquad d_{n}=\frac{2^{2n-3}}{ ( 2n-2 ) !}>0,\quad n\geq 2. $$
Setting
$$ \zeta_{n}:=\frac{c_{n}}{d_{n}}=\frac{3^{2n+1}-3}{ ( 2n+1 ) (2n)(2n-1)2^{2n-1}},\quad n \geq 2, $$
we have
$$ \zeta_{2}=\frac{1}{2}>\zeta_{3}=\frac{13}{40}>\zeta_{4}= \frac{205}{672}, $$
and \(\{ \zeta_{n} \} _{n\geq 4}\) is increasing since
$$ \zeta_{n+1}-\zeta_{n}=\frac{3}{4}\frac{ ( 10n^{2}-29n-12 ) 3^{2n}+6n ^{2}+21n+12}{2^{2n}n ( 2n+3 ) ( 2n+1 ) ( 2n-1 ) ( n+1 ) } >0 $$
for \(n\geq 4\). So
$$ \zeta_{2}>\zeta_{3}>\zeta_{4}< \zeta_{5}< \zeta_{6}< \cdots . $$
We compute
$$ H_{C,D} ( +\infty ) =\lim_{x\rightarrow +\infty } \biggl( \frac{C ^{\prime }}{D^{\prime }}D-C \biggr) =+\infty, $$
and we find that there exists \(t_{0}\in ( 0,+\infty ) \) such that the function \(C/D\) is strictly decreasing on \(( 0,t_{0} ) \) and strictly increasing on \(( t_{0},+\infty ) \) by Lemma 8. Let \(t_{1}=2.72078,t_{2}=2.72079\). We calculate
$$\begin{aligned}& L^{\prime }(t_{1})=-3.9522\times10^{-7} < 0, \\& L^{\prime }(t_{2})=3.7644\times 10^{-7}>0, \end{aligned}$$
and see that there exists \(t_{0}\in ( t_{1},t_{2} ) = ( 2.72078,2.72079 ) \subset ( 0,+\infty ) \) such that \(L^{\prime }(t_{0})=0\). So
$$ L(t_{0})=\min_{t\in (0,+\infty )}L(t)=\min_{t\in (2.72078,2.72079)}L(t), $$
and
$$ L(t_{0})\geq L(t_{2})+(t_{0}-t_{2})L^{\prime }(t_{2})= 0.35803\ldots. $$
Obviously, \(L(t)\geq L(t_{0})\) implies (2.12). □

3 The proof of Theorem 1

The proof of the inequality (1.3)
Let
$$ F(x)= x-\frac{3\sin x}{2+\cos x}- \frac{1}{180}x^{5},\quad 0< x< \pi . $$
Then
$$\begin{aligned} F^{\prime }(x) &=-\frac{1}{36 ( \cos x+2 ) ^{2}} \bigl( x^{4} ( \cos x+2 ) ^{2}-36 ( 1-\cos x ) ^{2} \bigr) \\ &=-\frac{x^{2} ( \cos x+2 ) +6 ( 1-\cos x ) }{36 ( \cos x+2 ) ^{2}} \bigl[ x^{2} ( \cos x+2 ) -6 ( 1-\cos x ) \bigr] . \end{aligned}$$
In order to prove \(F^{\prime }(x)>0\) holds for \(x\in (0,\pi )\), it suffices to show
$$ x^{2} ( \cos x+2 ) -6 ( 1-\cos x ) < 0,\quad 0< x< \pi . $$
(3.1)
Since
$$ \cos x=-\frac{\tan^{2}\frac{x}{2}-1}{\tan^{2}\frac{x}{2}+1} $$
(3.2)
we have
$$ x^{2} ( \cos x+2 ) -6 ( 1-\cos x ) < 0\quad \Longleftrightarrow \quad 1+ \frac{3}{ ( \tan \frac{x}{2} ) ^{2}}< \frac{3}{ ( \frac{x}{2} ) ^{2}}. $$
(3.3)
Let \(x/2=t\). Then (3.3) is equivalent to
$$ 1+\frac{3}{\tan^{2}t}< \frac{3}{t^{2}},\quad 0< t< \frac{\pi }{2}. $$
(3.4)
In fact, when letting
$$ f(t)=\frac{3}{t^{2}}-1-\frac{3}{\tan^{2}t},\quad 0< t< \frac{\pi }{2}, $$
(3.5)
then
$$ f\bigl(0^{+}\bigr)=1,f \biggl( \biggl( \frac{\pi }{2} \biggr) ^{-} \biggr) = \frac{12}{\pi^{2}}-1\thickapprox 0.21585>0. $$
(3.6)
By Lemma 1, we have
$$ f^{\prime }(t)=-\frac{6}{\sin^{3}t} \biggl[ \biggl( \frac{\sin t}{t} \biggr) ^{3}-\cos t \biggr] < 0,\quad 0< t< \frac{\pi }{2}, $$
(3.7)
which implies
$$ f(t)\geq \min_{t\in (0,\pi /2)}f(t)=f \biggl( \biggl( \frac{\pi }{2} \biggr) ^{-} \biggr) =\frac{12}{\pi^{2}}-1>0,\quad 0< t< \frac{\pi }{2}. $$
(3.8)
So \(F^{\prime }(x)>0\) holds for \(x\in (0,\pi )\), and
$$ F(x)= x-\frac{3\sin x}{2+\cos x}- \frac{1}{180}x^{5}>F(0)=0,\quad 0< x< \pi . $$
(3.9)
Since
$$ \lim_{x\rightarrow 0^{+}}\frac{x-\frac{3\sin x}{2+\cos x}}{x^{5}}= \frac{1}{180}, $$
this completes the proof of the inequality (1.3). □
The proof of the inequality (1.4)
Let
$$ G(x)=x-\frac{3\sin x}{2+\cos x} \biggl( 1+\frac{(1-\cos x)^{2}}{9(3+2 \cos x)} \biggr) - \frac{x^{7}}{2100},\quad 0< x< \pi . $$
Then \(G(0^{+})=0\), and
$$ G^{\prime }(x)=-\frac{1}{300 ( 2\cos x+3 ) ^{2}} \bigl[ x^{6} ( 2\cos x+3 ) ^{2}- 200 ( 1-\cos x ) ^{3} \bigr] . $$
(3.10)
In order to prove \(G^{\prime }(x)>0\) holds for \(x\in (0,\pi )\), it suffices to prove
$$ x^{6}< 200\frac{ ( 1-\cos x ) ^{3}}{ ( 2\cos x+3 ) ^{2}},\quad 0< x< \pi . $$
(3.11)
Via (3.2) we have
$$\begin{aligned}& 2\cos x+3=\frac{\tan^{2}\frac{x}{2}+5}{\tan^{2}\frac{x}{2}+1},\qquad 1- \cos x= 2 \frac{\tan^{2}\frac{x}{2}}{\tan^{2}\frac{x}{2}+1}, \end{aligned}$$
and (3.11) is equivalent to
$$ x^{6}< \biggl( \frac{40\tan^{3}\frac{x}{2}}{(\sec \frac{x}{2})(\sec^{2} \frac{x}{2}+4)} \biggr) ^{2}. $$
(3.12)
So (3.12) holds for \(x\in (0,\pi )\) when proving
$$ x^{3}< \frac{40\tan^{3}\frac{x}{2}}{(\sec \frac{x}{2})(\sec^{2} \frac{x}{2}+4)},\quad 0< x< \pi, $$
(3.13)
or
$$ \biggl( \frac{x}{2} \biggr) ^{3}< \frac{5\tan^{3}\frac{x}{2}}{(\sec \frac{x}{2})(\sec^{2}\frac{x}{2}+4)},\quad 0< x< \pi . $$
(3.14)
Let \(x/2=t\). Then \(t\in (0,\pi /2)\), and (3.14) is equivalent to
$$ t^{3}< \frac{5\tan^{3}t}{(\sec t)(\sec^{2}t+4)}= \frac{5\sin^{3}t}{4\cos^{2}t+1}, $$
(3.15)
or
$$ \biggl( \frac{\sin t}{t} \biggr) ^{3}>\frac{4\cos^{2}t+1}{5}=1- \frac{4}{5}\sin^{2}t. $$
(3.16)
In fact, by Lemma 7 we have
$$ \biggl( \frac{\sin t}{t} \biggr) ^{3}>1-\frac{\pi^{3}-8}{\pi^{3}} \sin^{2}t>1- \frac{4}{5}\sin^{2}t $$
(3.17)
for all \(t\in (0,\pi /2)\) due to \(4/5>(\pi^{3}-8)/\pi^{3}=0.74199\ldots\) .
Since
$$ \lim_{x\rightarrow 0^{+}}\frac{x-\frac{3\sin x}{2+\cos x} ( 1+\frac{(1- \cos x)^{2}}{9(3+2\cos x)} ) }{x^{7}}= \frac{1}{2100}, $$
this completes the proof of the inequality (1.4). □
So the proof of Theorem 1 is complete.

4 The proof of Theorem 2

The proof of the inequality (1.5)
Let
$$ S(x)=x-\frac{3\sinh x}{2+\cosh x}- \frac{1}{180}x^{5},\quad 0< x< + \infty . $$
Then
$$\begin{aligned} S^{\prime }(x)&=-\frac{x^{4} ( \cosh x+2 ) ^{2}-36 ( \cosh x-1 ) ^{2}}{36 ( \cosh x+2 ) ^{2}} \\ &=-\frac{x^{2} ( \cosh x+2 ) +6 ( \cosh x-1 ) }{36 ( \cos x+2 ) ^{2}} \bigl[ x^{2} ( \cosh x+2 ) -6 ( \cosh x-1 ) \bigr]. \end{aligned}$$
In order to prove that \(S^{\prime }(x)<0\) holds for \(x\in (0,+\infty )\), it suffices to show
$$ x^{2} ( \cosh x+2 ) -6 ( \cosh x-1 ) >0,\quad 0< x< + \infty . $$
(4.1)
Since
$$ \cosh x=-\frac{\tanh^{2}\frac{x}{2}+1}{\tanh^{2}\frac{x}{2}-1} $$
(4.2)
we have
$$ x^{2} ( \cosh x+2 ) -6 ( \cosh x-1 ) >0\quad \Longleftrightarrow \quad 1+ \frac{3}{ ( \tanh \frac{x}{2} ) ^{2}}>\frac{3}{ ( \frac{x}{2} ) ^{2}}. $$
(4.3)
Let \(x/2=t\). Then (4.3) is equivalent to
$$ 1+\frac{3}{\tanh^{2}t}>\frac{3}{t^{2}},\quad 0< t< +\infty . $$
(4.4)
In fact, when letting
$$ s(t)=\frac{3}{\tanh^{2}t}-1-\frac{3}{t^{2}},\quad 0< t< +\infty, $$
(4.5)
we have
$$ s\bigl(0^{+}\bigr)=1,\qquad s ( +\infty ) =2. $$
(4.6)
By Lemma 2 we can obtain
$$ s^{\prime }(t)=\frac{6}{\sinh^{3}t} \biggl( \biggl( \frac{\sinh t}{t} \biggr) ^{3}-\cosh t \biggr) >0,\quad 0< t< +\infty, $$
(4.7)
which implies
$$ s(t)\geq \min_{t\in (0,+\infty )}s(t)=s\bigl(0^{+} \bigr)=1>0,\quad 0< t< +\infty . $$
(4.8)
So \(S^{\prime }(x)<0\) holds for \(x\in (0,+\infty )\), and
$$ S(x)= x-\frac{3\sinh x}{2+\cosh x}- \frac{1}{180}x^{5}< S(0)=0,\quad 0< x< + \infty . $$
(4.9)
Since
$$ \lim_{x\rightarrow 0^{+}}\frac{x-\frac{3\sinh x}{2+\cosh x}}{x^{5}}= \frac{1}{180}, $$
this completes the proof of the inequality (1.5). □
The proof of the inequality (1.6)
Let \(p=9.537610179\cdot 10^{-5}\), and
$$ H(x)=x-\frac{3\sinh x}{2+\cosh x} \biggl( 1+\frac{(1-\cosh x)^{2}}{9(3+2 \cosh x)} \biggr) +px^{7},\quad 0< x< +\infty . $$
Then \(H(0^{+})=0\), and
$$ H^{\prime }(x)=\frac{21px^{6} ( 2\cosh x+3 ) ^{2}-2 ( \cosh x-1 ) ^{3}}{3 ( 2\cosh x+3 ) ^{2}}. $$
We have
$$\begin{aligned}& H^{\prime }(x)>0 \quad \Longleftrightarrow \quad p< \frac{2 ( \cosh x-1 ) ^{3}}{21x^{6} ( 2\cosh x+3 ) ^{2}} \\& \hphantom{H^{\prime }(x)>0 }\quad \Longleftrightarrow \quad x^{6}< \frac{998.553028 ( \cosh x-1 ) ^{3}}{ ( 2\cosh x+3 ) ^{2}} \\& \hphantom{H^{\prime }(x)>0 \quad \Longleftrightarrow \quad x^{6}}=\frac{998.553028 ( 2\frac{\tanh^{2}\frac{x}{2}}{1-\tanh^{2}\frac{x}{2}} ) ^{3}}{ ( \frac{5-\tanh^{2}\frac{x}{2}}{1-\tanh^{2}\frac{x}{2}} ) ^{2}} =\frac{7988.424224\cosh^{2}\frac{x}{2}\tanh^{6}\frac{x}{2}}{ ( 5-\tanh^{2} \frac{x}{2} ) ^{2}} \\& \hphantom{H^{\prime }(x)>0 } \quad \Longleftrightarrow \quad x^{3}< 89.37798512 \frac{\cosh \frac{x}{2}\tanh^{3}\frac{x}{2}}{5-\tanh^{2}\frac{x}{2}} = 89.37798512\frac{\sinh^{3}\frac{x}{2}}{5\cosh^{2}x-\sinh^{2}\frac{x}{2}} \\& \hphantom{H^{\prime }(x)>0 }\quad \Longleftrightarrow \quad \biggl( \frac{\sin t}{t} \biggr) ^{3}> \frac{5+4\sinh^{2}t}{11.17224814}, \end{aligned}$$
where \(t=x/2>0\). In fact, by (2.12) in Lemma 9 we have
$$ \biggl( \frac{\sinh t}{t} \biggr) ^{3}>1+0.35803\sinh^{2}t> \frac{5+4\sinh^{2}t}{11.17224814}. $$
The last inequality holds for \(t\in ( 0,+\infty ) \) due to
$$\begin{aligned} & 11.17224814\bigl(1+0.35803\sinh^{2}t\bigr)-\bigl(5+4 \sinh^{2}t\bigr) \\ &\quad = 1.5642\times 10^{-9}\cosh 2t+ 6.17224814>0. \end{aligned}$$
Therefore \(H^{\prime }(x)>0\), and \(H(x)>H(0^{+})=0\) holds for \(x\in ( 0,+\infty ) \).
So the proof of Theorem 2 is complete. □

5 Remarks

Remark 1
The inequalities (1.3) and (1.4) are obviously better than the famous Cusa–Huygens inequality (see [1013]):
$$ \frac{\sin x}{x}< \frac{2+\cos x}{3},\quad 0< x< \frac{\pi }{2}. $$
(5.1)
Remark 2
Mortici [14] strengthened (5.1) to
$$ \frac{\sin x}{x}< \frac{2+\cos x}{3}-\frac{1}{180}x^{4}+ \frac{1}{3780}x ^{6},\quad 0< x< \frac{\pi }{2}. $$
(5.2)
It is in Frame [2] that the following double inequality was also given:
$$ \frac{2+\cos x-\frac{x^{2}}{\pi^{2}}}{3-\frac{x^{2}}{\pi^{2}}}< \frac{ \sin x}{x}< \frac{2+\cos x-\frac{x^{2}}{10}}{3-\frac{x^{2}}{10}},\quad 0< x< \pi, $$
(5.3)
or
$$ \frac{2+\cos x}{3}-\frac{x(x-\sin x)}{3\pi^{2}}< \frac{\sin x}{x}< \frac{2+ \cos x}{3}- \frac{x(x-\sin x)}{30},\quad 0< x< \pi . $$
(5.4)
In order to compare the three inequalities (1.4), (5.2), and the right hand side of (5.4), we rewrite (1.4) as
$$ \frac{\sin x}{x}< \frac{1-\frac{x^{6}}{2100}}{1+\frac{(1-\cos x)^{2}}{9(3+2 \cos x)}}\frac{2+\cos x}{3}. $$
(5.5)
(i) We first compare two inequalities (5.5) and (5.2) on the same interval \((0,\pi /2)\). We compute
$$\begin{aligned}& \biggl( 1+\frac{(1-\cos x)^{2}}{9(3+2\cos x)} \biggr) \biggl( \frac{2+ \cos x}{3}- \frac{1}{180}x^{4}+\frac{1}{3780}x^{6} \biggr) - \biggl( 1-\frac{x ^{6}}{2100} \biggr) \frac{2+\cos x}{3} \\& \quad = \frac{1}{170\text{,}100}\frac{\cos x+2}{2\cos x+3}i(x), \end{aligned}$$
where
$$ i(x)=-12\text{,}600\cos x-105x^{4}\cos x+59x^{6}\cos x-1470x^{4}+151x^{6}+6300 \cos^{2}x+6300. $$
Numerical results show that \(i(x)>0\) for all \(x\in (0, 0.0040)\) and \(i(x)<0\) for all \(x\in (0.0040,\pi /2)\). That is, the upper estimate in (5.5) is smaller than the one in (5.2) on the interval \((0,0.0040)\), meanwhile the upper estimate in (5.2) is smaller than the one in (5.5) on the interval \((0.0040,\pi /2)\). So these two inequalities (1.4) and (5.2) are not included in each other.
(ii) Then we compare the two inequalities (5.5) and the right hand side of (5.4) on the same interval \((0,\pi )\). Let us check the function
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} &\frac{x^{6}}{2100}\frac{2+\cos x}{3}+\frac{(1-\cos x)^{2}}{9(3+2 \cos x)}\frac{2+\cos x}{3}- \frac{x(x-\sin x)}{30} \biggl( 1+\frac{(1- \cos x)^{2}}{9(3+2\cos x)} \biggr) \\ &\quad = \frac{1}{18\text{,}900}\frac{\cos x+2}{2\cos x+3}j(x), \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$
where
$$\begin{aligned} j(x) &=-1400\cos x-70x^{2}\cos x+6x^{6}\cos x+980x\sin x-980x^{2}+9x ^{6} \\ &\quad {}+700\cos^{2}x+70x\cos x\sin x+700. \end{aligned}$$
Numerical results show that \(j(x)>0\) for all \(x\in (0, 0.4878)\) and \(i(x)<0\) for all \(x\in (0.4878,\pi )\). That is, the upper estimate in (5.5) is smaller than the one in the right hand side of (5.4) on the interval \((0,0.4878)\), meanwhile the upper estimate in the right hand side of (5.4) is smaller than the one in (5.5) on the interval \((0.4878,\pi )\). So these two inequalities (1.4) and the right hand side of (5.4) are not included in each other.
In a word, inequality (1.4) is not contained in the other improved Cusa–Huygens inequalities showed in [14] and [2] and is stronger than those ones near \(x=0\).
Remark 3
Using the methods in [1517] and in [18], one can directly prove the inequalities (1.3) and (1.4), (1.5) and (1.6), respectively. A different approach based on the power series expansions, to proving, refinements and generalizations of inequalities of the similar type can be found in [19].

6 Conclusions

In the present study, we find that there are two wrong inequalities for circular functions in the famous monograph “Analytic Inequalities” by Mitrinovic, and we reestablish two inequalities on this topic and create two corresponding inequalities for hyperbolic functions. These new inequalities are the generalization of the famous Cusa–Huygens inequality, one of them is not contained in other improved Cusa–Huygens inequalities showed in [14] and [2] and is stronger than the ones near \(x=0\).

Competing interests

The author declares that he has no competing interests.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Mitrinovic, D.S., Adamovic, D.D.: Complement à l’article “Sur une inégalité élémentaire où interviennent des fonctions trigonométriques”. Publ. Elektroteh. Fak. Univ. Beogr., Ser. Mat. Fiz. 166, 31–32 (1966) MATH Mitrinovic, D.S., Adamovic, D.D.: Complement à l’article “Sur une inégalité élémentaire où interviennent des fonctions trigonométriques”. Publ. Elektroteh. Fak. Univ. Beogr., Ser. Mat. Fiz. 166, 31–32 (1966) MATH
4.
go back to reference Lazarevic, I.: Neke nejednakosti sa hiperbolickim funkcijama. Publ. Elektroteh. Fak. Univ. Beogr., Ser. Mat. Fiz. 170, 41–48 (1966) MathSciNet Lazarevic, I.: Neke nejednakosti sa hiperbolickim funkcijama. Publ. Elektroteh. Fak. Univ. Beogr., Ser. Mat. Fiz. 170, 41–48 (1966) MathSciNet
6.
go back to reference Scharlau, W., Opolka, H.: From Fermat to Minkowski. Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, New York (1985) CrossRefMATH Scharlau, W., Opolka, H.: From Fermat to Minkowski. Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, New York (1985) CrossRefMATH
7.
go back to reference Biernacki, M., Krzyz, J.: On the monotonicity of certain functionals in the theory of analytic functions. Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sect. A 2, 134–145 (1955) Biernacki, M., Krzyz, J.: On the monotonicity of certain functionals in the theory of analytic functions. Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sect. A 2, 134–145 (1955)
10.
go back to reference Campan, F.T.: The Story of Number π. Ed. Albatros, Romania (1977) Campan, F.T.: The Story of Number π. Ed. Albatros, Romania (1977)
11.
go back to reference Iuskevici, A.P.: History of Mathematics in 16th and 16th Centuries, Moskva (1961) Iuskevici, A.P.: History of Mathematics in 16th and 16th Centuries, Moskva (1961)
12.
go back to reference Cajori, F.: A History of Mathematics, 2nd edn. MacMillan, New York (1929) MATH Cajori, F.: A History of Mathematics, 2nd edn. MacMillan, New York (1929) MATH
13.
go back to reference Huygens, C.: Oeuvres Complètes. Publiées par la Societé Hollandaise des Science. Haga 1888–1940 (20 volumes) Huygens, C.: Oeuvres Complètes. Publiées par la Societé Hollandaise des Science. Haga 1888–1940 (20 volumes)
14.
go back to reference Mortici, C.: The natural approach of Wilker–Cusa–Huygens inequalities. Math. Inequal. Appl. 14(3), 535–541 (2011) MathSciNetMATH Mortici, C.: The natural approach of Wilker–Cusa–Huygens inequalities. Math. Inequal. Appl. 14(3), 535–541 (2011) MathSciNetMATH
15.
go back to reference Malesevic, B., Makragic, M.: A method for proving some inequalities on mixed trigonometric polynomial functions. J. Math. Inequal. 10(3), 849–876 (2016) MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Malesevic, B., Makragic, M.: A method for proving some inequalities on mixed trigonometric polynomial functions. J. Math. Inequal. 10(3), 849–876 (2016) MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
17.
go back to reference Malesevic, B., Lutovac, T., Banjac, B.: A proof of an open problem of Yusuke Nishizawa for a power-exponential function. J. Math. Inequal. (2018, in press) Malesevic, B., Lutovac, T., Banjac, B.: A proof of an open problem of Yusuke Nishizawa for a power-exponential function. J. Math. Inequal. (2018, in press)
18.
go back to reference Makragic, M.: A method for proving some inequalities on mixed hyperbolic-trigonometric polynomial functions. J. Math. Inequal. 11(3), 817–829 (2016) MathSciNetMATH Makragic, M.: A method for proving some inequalities on mixed hyperbolic-trigonometric polynomial functions. J. Math. Inequal. 11(3), 817–829 (2016) MathSciNetMATH
19.
go back to reference Malesevic, B., Lutovac, T., Rasajski, M., Mortici, C.: Extensions of the natural approach to refinements and generalizations of some trigonometric inequalities. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2018, Article ID 90 (2018) MathSciNetCrossRef Malesevic, B., Lutovac, T., Rasajski, M., Mortici, C.: Extensions of the natural approach to refinements and generalizations of some trigonometric inequalities. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2018, Article ID 90 (2018) MathSciNetCrossRef
Metadata
Title
On Frame’s inequalities
Author
Ling Zhu
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of Inequalities and Applications / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1029-242X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-018-1687-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Journal of Inequalities and Applications 1/2018 Go to the issue

Premium Partner