Top

Sexuality Research and Social Policy

Published in:

14-06-2023

Predictors of Engagement in Abortion-Related Activism Before and After the Nomination of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh

Authors: Kristen N. Jozkowski, Brandon L. Crawford, Megan K. Simmons, Ronna C. Turner, Wen-Juo Lo

Published in: Sexuality Research and Social Policy | Issue 1/2024

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Context

Guided by the Civic Voluntarism Model (CVM), we examined (1) people’s lifetime engagement in abortion-related activism behaviors prior to Justice Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court of the United States and (2) people’s first-time engagement in abortion-related activism behaviors after his nomination. We examined predictors of lifetime and first-time engagement separately for people who identify as pro-life, pro-choice, and neither/both.

Method

A web-based survey was administered to U.S. adults in English and Spanish (N = 4,743). We used logistic regression to assess predictors of (1) lifetime engagement in four abortion activism behaviors (e.g., calling politicians, attending rallies) before Kavanaugh’s nomination and (2) first-time engagement in the same four behaviors after Kavanaugh’s nomination for people who identified as pro-life, pro-choice, and neither/both.

Results

Approximately 17–30% of participants engaged in abortion-related activism prior to Kavanaugh’s nomination and 3–8% for the first time after his nomination. CVM variables were better at predicting lifetime than first-time engagement and seemed to be more consistent predictors for pro-life and pro-choice groups than neither/both.

Conclusions

Abortion-related engagement after Kavanaugh’s nomination was minimal, suggesting that this event may not have sparked new engagement. Because CVM variables were more effective predictors of lifetime engagement, especially among people who identified as pro-life and pro-choice, the CVM may function better for those invested to some degree in an issue.

Implications

Abortion advocacy groups may consider using the CVM to engage people in abortion-related activism generally. However, abortion movement leaders may consider other tactics to engage people for the first time.

previous article Mental Health and Substance Use Factors Associated with Sexual Violence Victimization and Perpetration in University Samples: A Meta-Analysis

next article The Dynamics of Intimate Relations in Residential Settings for People with Intellectual Disabilities: Social Workers’ Perspective

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Available only for authorised users

Even when not explicitly stated, all discussions of odds ratios for categorical predictors are made in comparison to the reference group. All of the reference groups are identified in the logistic regression tables.

In some cases, odds ratios for multiple models are presented as a range. In these cases, only significant ORs are reported, and the 95% CIs are not included in the text but can be found in the referenced table.

Adamczyk, A., Kim, C., & Dillon, L. (2020). Examining public opinion about abortion: A mixed-methods systematic review of research over the last 15 years. Sociological Inquiry, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1111/soin.12351

Alter, C. (2018). “People are no longer afraid.” Hundreds of women protest as Kavanaugh’s fate hangs in balance. Time. Retrieved March 30, 2021, from https://time.com/5416105/kavanaugh-protest/

Alumbaugh, S., & Rowland, C. K. (1990). The links between platform-based appointment criteria and trial judges’ abortion judgments. Judicature, 74, 153–162.PubMed

Barkan, S. E. (2004). Explaining public support for the environmental movement: A civic voluntarism model. Social Science Quarterly, 85(4), 913–937. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00251.xCrossRef

Behl, A., & Dutta, P. (2020). Engaging donors on crowdfunding platform in Disaster Relief Operations (DRO) using gamification: A Civic Voluntary Model (CVM) approach. International Journal of Information Management, 54, 102140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102140

Berman, M. (2017). Trump promised judges who would overturn Roe v. Wade. Washington Post. Retrieved March 31, 2021, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2017/live-updates/trump-white-house/neil-gorsuch-confirmation-hearings-updates-and-analysis-on-the-supreme-court-nominee/trump-promised-judges-who-would-overturn-roe-v-wade/

Bilger, M. (2018). Pro-life groups support Judge Brett Kavanagh for supreme court: Has a “strong record of protecting life.” LifeNews.Com. Retrieved March 31, 2021, from https://www.lifenews.com/2018/07/10/pro-life-groups-support-judge-brett-kavanagh-for-supreme-court-has-a-strong-record-of-protecting-life/

Bimber, B. (2017). Three prompts for collective action in the context of digital media. Political Communication, 34(1), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1223772CrossRef

Birkhead, N. A., & Hershey, M. R. (2017). Assessing the ideological extremism of American party activists. Party Politics, 25(4), 495–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817730721CrossRef

Buechler, S. M. (1993). Beyond resource mobilization? Emerging trends in social movement theory. The Sociological Quarterly, 34(2), 217–235. JSTOR.

Cowan, S. K. (2017). Enacted abortion stigma in the United States. Social Science & Medicine, 177, 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.011CrossRef

Crawford, B. L., LaRoche, K. J., & Jozkowski, K. N. (2022). Examining abortion attitudes in the context of gestational age. Social Science Quarterly, 103(4), 855–867. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13157CrossRef

Dejmanee, T. (2020). #MeToo; #HimToo: Popular feminism and hashtag activism in the Kavanaugh Hearings. 18.

Dimock, M., Lugo, L., Doherty, C., & Cooperman, A. (2013, January 16). Roe v. Wade at 40: Most oppose overturning abortion decision, Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C. Retrieved September 15, 2019, from https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2013/01/16/roe-v-wade-at-40/

Evans, J. (2002). Polarization in abortion attitudes in U.S. religious traditions, 1972–1998. Sociological Forum, 17(3), 397–422.

Green, E. (2018, September 5). Democrats are coming after Kavanaugh on abortion. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/09/democrats-are-coming-after-kavanaugh-on-abortion/569380/

Guo, J., Liu, N., Wu, Y., & Zhang, C. (2021). Why do citizens participate on government social media accounts during crises? A civic voluntarism perspective. Information & Management, 58(1), 103286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2020.103286

Guttmacher Institute. (2019). State abortion policy landscape: From hostile to supportive. Retrieved October 14, 2022, from https://web.archive.org/web/20190103013905/https:/www.guttmacher.org/article/2018/12/state-abortion-policy-landscape-hostile-supportive

Hans, J. D., & Kimberly, C. (2014). Abortion attitudes in context: A multidimensional vignette approach. Social Science Research, 48, 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.06.001CrossRefPubMed

Harkness, J. A., Vijver, F. J. R. V. de, & Mohler, P. (2003). Cross-cultural survey methods (1st ed.). Wiley.

Hillygus, D. S., & Shields, T. G. (2005). Moral issues and voter decision making in the 2004 presidential election. PS: Political Science & Politics, 38(02), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096505056301

Jaffe, S. (2018). Trump’s second supreme court nominee, Brett Kavanaugh. The Lancet; London, 392(10144), 267–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31211-X

Johnson, A. A. (2014). Ambivalence, political engagement and context. Political Studies, 62(3), 502–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12063CrossRef

Jones, C. (2020). Women gather at Phoenix courthouse to protest Amy Coney Barrett’s planned confirmation. The Arizona Republic. Retrieved February 25, 2022, from https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/phoenix-breaking/2020/10/25/afraid-roe-v-wade-women-protest-amy-coney-barrett-confirmation/6034163002/

Jones, R. P., Cox, D., Griffin, R., Najle, M., Fisch-Friedman, M., & Vandermaas-Peeler, A. (2019). American democracy in crisis: Civic engagement, young adult activism, and the 2018 midterm elections (p. 48). Public Religion Research Institute. Retrieved November 10, 2020, from https://www.prri.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Civic-Engagement-NovB.pdf

Jozkowski, K. N., Crawford, B. L., Turner, R. C., & Lo, W.-J. (2020). Knowledge and sentiments of Roe v. Wade in the wake of Justice Kavanaugh’s nomination to the US Supreme Court. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 17(2), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-019-00392-2

Jozkowski, K. N., Crawford, B. L., & Willis, M. (2021). Abortion complexity scores from 1972 to 2018: A cross-sectional time-series analysis using data from the general social survey. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, Online. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-020-00439-9CrossRef

Jozkowski, K.N., Turner, R.C., Weese, J., Lo, W.J., & Crawford, B.L. (2022). Abortion vs. sexual assault: People’s perceptions of Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court of the United States, Journal of Sex Research, 59(9), 1073–1081. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2021.1984377

Kenan Institute for Ethics. (2012). Measuring morality [SPSS]. Duke University.

Kim, Y., & Khang, H. (2014). Revisiting civic voluntarism predictors of college students’ political participation in the context of social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.044CrossRef

Klofstad, C. A. (2007). Talk leads to recruitment: How discussions about politics and current events increase civic participation. Political Research Quarterly, 60(2), 180–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907301708CrossRef

Kumar, A. (2018). Disgust, stigma, and the politics of abortion. Feminism & Psychology, 28(4), 530–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353518765572CrossRef

Kusumarani, R., & Zo, H. (2019). Why people participate in online political crowdfunding: A civic voluntarism perspective. Telematics and Informatics, 41, 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.04.011CrossRef

Leighley, J. E. (1995). Attitudes, opportunities and incentives: A field essay on political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 48(1), 181–209. https://doi.org/10.2307/449127CrossRef

Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Rosenthal, S., Cutler, M., & Kotcher, J. (2018). Politics & Global Warming, March 2018 (Yale Program on Climate Change Communication). Yale University and George Mason University.

McCammon, S. (2020). A look at Amy Coney Barrett’s record on abortion rights. NPR. Retrieved March 30, 2021, from https://www.npr.org/2020/09/28/917827735/a-look-at-amy-coney-barretts-record-on-abortion-rights

Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. (2012). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 437–455. pdh. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028085

Medoff, M. H. (2010). State abortion policies, targeted regulation of abortion provider laws, and abortion demand: State abortion policies, TRAP laws, and abortion demand. Review of Policy Research, 27(5), 577–594. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010.00460.xCrossRef

Meyer, D. S., & Staggenborg, S. (1996). Movements, countermovements, and the structure of political opportunity. American Journal of Sociology, 101(6), 1628–1660.CrossRef

Meyer, D. S., & Staggenborg, S. (2008). Opposing movement strategies in U.S. abortion politics. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, 28(1), 207–238.

Morrison, S. (2018). Brett Kavanaugh nomination protest: Emily Ratajkowski and Amy Schumer among hundreds arrested at rally in Washington. In Evening Standard: Web Edition Articles (London, England). Access World News – Historical and Current. Retrieved March 31, 2021, from http://infoweb.newsbank.com/apps/news/openurl?ctx_ver=z39.88-2004&rft_id=info%3Asid/infoweb.newsbank.com&svc_dat=WORLDNEWS&req_dat=0D10997327EA07D5&rft_val_format=info%3Aofi/fmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Actx&rft_dat=document_id%3Anews%252F16EDE112863733A8

Munson, Z. (2018). Abortion politics. John Wiley & Sons.

Oni, A. A., Oni, S., Mbarika, V., & Ayo, C. K. (2017). Empirical study of user acceptance of online political participation: Integrating civic voluntarism model and theory of reasoned action. Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.02.003CrossRef

Ostrander, J., Kindler, T., & Bryan, J. (2021). Using the civic voluntarism model to compare the political participation of US and Swiss social workers. Journal of Policy Practice and Research, 2(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42972-020-00020-zCrossRef

Owens, M. L., & Walker, H. L. (2018). The civic voluntarism of “custodial citizens”: Involuntary criminal justice contact, associational life, and political participation. Perspectives on Politics, 16(4), 990–1013. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592718002074CrossRef

Pew Research Center. (2018). Americans divided on Kavanaugh’s nomination to the supreme court. Retrieved March 30, 2021, from http://www.people-press.org/2018/07/17/americans-divided-on-kavanaughs-nomination-to-the-supreme-court/

Riffkin, R. (2015). Abortion edges up as important voting issue for Americans. Gallup. Retrieved September 15, 2019, from https://news.gallup.com/poll/183449/abortion-edges-important-voting-issue-americans.aspx

Roh, J., & Haider-Markel, D. P. (2003). All politics is not local: National forces in state abortion initiatives*. Social Science Quarterly, 84(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.t01-1-8401002CrossRef

Rosenstone, S. J., & Hansen, J. M. (1993). Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. Macmillan Publishing Company.

Saad, L. (2018). In depth: Abortion. Gallup.Com. Retrieved September 15, 2019, from https://news.gallup.com/poll/1576/Abortion.aspx

Schlozman, K. L., Burns, N., Verba, S., & Donahue, J. (1995). Gender and citizen participation: Is there a different voice? American Journal of Political Science, 39(2), 267–293. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111613CrossRef

Snell, K. (2018). Kavanaugh nomination sparks partisan uproar on abortion rights. National Public Radio. Retrieved March 31, 2021, from https://www.npr.org/2018/07/10/627461139/kavanaugh-nomination-sparks-partisan-uproar-on-abortion-rights

Torres, R. (n.d.) (2022). “I just felt that I need to do something”: Protesters oppose Barrett’s nomination to supreme court. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Retrieved February 25, 2022, from https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/local/milwaukee/2020/10/17/protesters-oppose-amy-coney-barretts-nomination-supreme-court/3697205001/

US Census Bureau. (2017). Voting and registration in the election of November 2016. Retrieved November 11, 2020, from https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/voting-and-registration/p20-580.html

U.S. Reports: Roe v. Wade. (1973). 410 U.S. 113. Retrieved October 14, 2022, from https://www.loc.gov/item/usrep410113

Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice & equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Harvard University Press.

Villarreal, D. (2020). Activists dressed as handmaids protest Amy Coney Barrett nomination outside Supreme Court. Newsweek. Retrieved March 31, 2021, from https://www.newsweek.com/activists-dressed-handmaids-protest-amy-coney-barrett-nomination-outside-supreme-court-1535787

Yan, T., & Tourangeau, R. (2008). Fast times and easy questions: The effects of age, experience and question complexity on web survey response times. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1331CrossRef

Title: Predictors of Engagement in Abortion-Related Activism Before and After the Nomination of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Authors: Kristen N. Jozkowski
Brandon L. Crawford
Megan K. Simmons
Ronna C. Turner
Wen-Juo Lo
Publication date: 14-06-2023
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Sexuality Research and Social Policy / Issue 1/2024
Print ISSN: 1868-9884
Electronic ISSN: 1553-6610
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-023-00815-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Context

Method

Results

Conclusions

Implications

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

How Artistic Actions Can Foster Sensitivity to Equality in Diversity in Public University Participants and Observers

Predictors of Public Attitudes Regarding the Impact of “End Demand” Legislation: Findings from an Israeli Survey

Relationship between Religion and Public Attitudes toward Same-Sex Marriage: Examining the role of Traditional Chinese Religions through a Case Study of Hong Kong

The Effect of a Mobile App-Based Psychosexual Intervention on Promoting Help-Seeking Behaviors for Sexual Health Issues Among Iranian Newly Married Women: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

A Networked Model of Ecological Systems Theory to Discuss Concerns in Italian Bisexual+ and Transgender People After the Block of the “Zan Bill” by Senate

The Impact of Anti-discrimination Legislation on Transgender People within the USA