Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Environmental Management 5/2010

01-05-2010

Public Perception of Blue-Algae Bloom Risk in Hongze Lake of China

Authors: Lei Huang, Kai Sun, Jie Ban, Jun Bi

Published in: Environmental Management | Issue 5/2010

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this work we characterize the public perception of one kind of ecological risk—blue-algae bloom in Hongze Lake, China, based on the psychometric paradigm method. In the first survey of May 2008, 300 respondents of Sihong County adjacent to Hongze Lake were investigated, with a total of 156 questionnaires returned. Then in a second survey of July 2008, 500 respondents from the same research area were investigated, with 318 questionnaires collected. This research firstly attempted to explore the local respondents’ degree of concern regarding ecological changes to Hongze Lake in the last ten years. Secondly, to explore the public perception of blue-algae bloom compared to three typical kinds of hazards including earthquake, nuclear power and public traffic. T-test was used to examine the difference of risk perception in these four hazards over time. The third part of this research, with demographic analysis and nonparametric statistical test, predicted the different groups of respondents’ willingness to accept (WTA) risk of blue-algae bloom in two surveys. Using multiple linear regression analysis, the risk perception model explained 28.3% of variance in the WTA blue-algae bloom risk. The variables of Knowledge, Social effect, Benefit, Controllability and Trust in government were significantly correlated with WTA, which implied that these variables were the main influencing factors explaining the respondents’ willingness to accept risk. The results would help the Chinese government to comprehend the public’s risk perception of the lake ecosystem, inducing well designed communication of risks with public and making effective mitigation policies to improve people’s rational risk judgment.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Axelrod LJ, McDaniels T, Slovic P (1999) Perceptions of ecological risk from natural hazards. Journal of Risk Research 2(1):31–53CrossRef Axelrod LJ, McDaniels T, Slovic P (1999) Perceptions of ecological risk from natural hazards. Journal of Risk Research 2(1):31–53CrossRef
go back to reference Bonita LM, David OT (2008) Perceptions of ecological risk associated with mountain pine beetle (dendroctonus ponderosae) infestations in banff and kootenay national parks of Canada. Risk Analysis 28(1):803–813 Bonita LM, David OT (2008) Perceptions of ecological risk associated with mountain pine beetle (dendroctonus ponderosae) infestations in banff and kootenay national parks of Canada. Risk Analysis 28(1):803–813
go back to reference Bronfman N, Cifutenes LA (2003) Risk perception in a developing country: the case of Chile. Risk Analysis 23(6):1309–1323CrossRef Bronfman N, Cifutenes LA (2003) Risk perception in a developing country: the case of Chile. Risk Analysis 23(6):1309–1323CrossRef
go back to reference Cervantes O, Espeje I, Arellano E, Delhumeau S (2008) Users’ perception as a tool to improve urban beach planning and management. Environmental Management 42(2):249–264CrossRef Cervantes O, Espeje I, Arellano E, Delhumeau S (2008) Users’ perception as a tool to improve urban beach planning and management. Environmental Management 42(2):249–264CrossRef
go back to reference Chaiken S, Maheswaran D (1994) Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66:460–473CrossRef Chaiken S, Maheswaran D (1994) Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66:460–473CrossRef
go back to reference Chaiken S, Liberman A, Early AH (1989) Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In: Uleman JS, Bargh JA (eds) Unintended thought. Guilford Press, New York Chaiken S, Liberman A, Early AH (1989) Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In: Uleman JS, Bargh JA (eds) Unintended thought. Guilford Press, New York
go back to reference Elosegi A, Gregory SV, Joshi V, Mutz M, Rinaldi M, Wyzga B, Zawiejska J (2005) Public perception as a barrier to introducing wood in Rivers for restoration purpose. Environmental Management 36(5):665–674CrossRef Elosegi A, Gregory SV, Joshi V, Mutz M, Rinaldi M, Wyzga B, Zawiejska J (2005) Public perception as a barrier to introducing wood in Rivers for restoration purpose. Environmental Management 36(5):665–674CrossRef
go back to reference El-Zein A, Nasrallah R, Nuwayhid I (2006) Determinants of the willingness-to-participate in an environmental intervention in a beirut neighborhood. Environmental Management 37(2):200–208CrossRef El-Zein A, Nasrallah R, Nuwayhid I (2006) Determinants of the willingness-to-participate in an environmental intervention in a beirut neighborhood. Environmental Management 37(2):200–208CrossRef
go back to reference Flynn J, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S (1994) Gender, race and environmental health risks. Risk Analysis 14:1101–1108CrossRef Flynn J, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S (1994) Gender, race and environmental health risks. Risk Analysis 14:1101–1108CrossRef
go back to reference Grothman T, Reusswig F (2006) People at risk of flooding: why some residents take precautionary action while others do not. Natural Hazards 38:101–120CrossRef Grothman T, Reusswig F (2006) People at risk of flooding: why some residents take precautionary action while others do not. Natural Hazards 38:101–120CrossRef
go back to reference Guo L (2007) Doing battle with the green monster of Taihu Lake. Science 317:1166CrossRef Guo L (2007) Doing battle with the green monster of Taihu Lake. Science 317:1166CrossRef
go back to reference Hammitt JK, Liu JT (2004) Effects of disease type and latency on the value of mortality risk. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 28(1):73–95CrossRef Hammitt JK, Liu JT (2004) Effects of disease type and latency on the value of mortality risk. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 28(1):73–95CrossRef
go back to reference Ho MC, Shaw D, Lin S (2008) How do disaster characteristics influence risk perception? Risk Analysis 28(3):635–643CrossRef Ho MC, Shaw D, Lin S (2008) How do disaster characteristics influence risk perception? Risk Analysis 28(3):635–643CrossRef
go back to reference Hohl K, Gaskell G (2008) European public perceptions of food risk: cross-national and methodological comparisons. Risk Analysis 28(2):311–324CrossRef Hohl K, Gaskell G (2008) European public perceptions of food risk: cross-national and methodological comparisons. Risk Analysis 28(2):311–324CrossRef
go back to reference Huang L, Duan BL, Bi J, Yuan ZW, Ban J (2010) Analysis of determining factors of risk acceptable level in public: the case of China. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 16(2):95–110 Huang L, Duan BL, Bi J, Yuan ZW, Ban J (2010) Analysis of determining factors of risk acceptable level in public: the case of China. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 16(2):95–110
go back to reference Ji BC, Hong KK, Sam KR (2008) Analysis of local acceptance of a radioactive waste disposal facility. Risk Analysis 28(4):1021–1032CrossRef Ji BC, Hong KK, Sam KR (2008) Analysis of local acceptance of a radioactive waste disposal facility. Risk Analysis 28(4):1021–1032CrossRef
go back to reference Kunreuther H, Eastering D, Desvousges W (1990) Public attitudes toward siting a high-level nuclear waste repository in Nevada. Risk Analysis 10(4):469–484CrossRef Kunreuther H, Eastering D, Desvousges W (1990) Public attitudes toward siting a high-level nuclear waste repository in Nevada. Risk Analysis 10(4):469–484CrossRef
go back to reference Lee HF, Zhang DD (2005) Perceiving land-degrading activities from the lay perspective in Northern China. Environmental Management 36(5):711–725CrossRef Lee HF, Zhang DD (2005) Perceiving land-degrading activities from the lay perspective in Northern China. Environmental Management 36(5):711–725CrossRef
go back to reference Lienhoop N, MacMillan D (2007) Valuing wilderness in Iceland: estimation of WTA and WTP using the market stall approach to contingent valuation. Land Use Policy 24:289–295CrossRef Lienhoop N, MacMillan D (2007) Valuing wilderness in Iceland: estimation of WTA and WTP using the market stall approach to contingent valuation. Land Use Policy 24:289–295CrossRef
go back to reference Lindell MK (2000) Household adjustment to earthquake hazard: a review of research. Environment and Behavior 32:461–501CrossRef Lindell MK (2000) Household adjustment to earthquake hazard: a review of research. Environment and Behavior 32:461–501CrossRef
go back to reference Marincioni F, Appiotti F (2009) The Lyon-Turin high-speed rail: the public debate and perception of environmental risk in Susa valley, Italy. Environmental Management 43(5):863–875CrossRef Marincioni F, Appiotti F (2009) The Lyon-Turin high-speed rail: the public debate and perception of environmental risk in Susa valley, Italy. Environmental Management 43(5):863–875CrossRef
go back to reference McDaniels T, Axelrod LJ, Slovic P (1995) Characterizing perception of ecological risk. Risk Analysis 15(5):575–588CrossRef McDaniels T, Axelrod LJ, Slovic P (1995) Characterizing perception of ecological risk. Risk Analysis 15(5):575–588CrossRef
go back to reference Mitchell RC, Carson RT (1986) Valuing drinking water risk reductions using the contingent valuation method: a methodological study of risks from THM and Giardia. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC Mitchell RC, Carson RT (1986) Valuing drinking water risk reductions using the contingent valuation method: a methodological study of risks from THM and Giardia. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC
go back to reference Mrozek JR, Taylor LO (2002) What determines the value of life? A meta analysis. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 21:253–270CrossRef Mrozek JR, Taylor LO (2002) What determines the value of life? A meta analysis. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 21:253–270CrossRef
go back to reference Nakayachi K (1998) How do people evaluate risk reduction when they are told zero risk is impossible? Risk Analysis 18(3):235–242CrossRef Nakayachi K (1998) How do people evaluate risk reduction when they are told zero risk is impossible? Risk Analysis 18(3):235–242CrossRef
go back to reference Nyland LG (1993) Risk perception in Brazil and Sweden. RHIZIKON: Risk Research Report No. 15. Center for Risk Research, Stockholm School of Economics Nyland LG (1993) Risk perception in Brazil and Sweden. RHIZIKON: Risk Research Report No. 15. Center for Risk Research, Stockholm School of Economics
go back to reference Poumadere M, Mays C, Slovic P (1995) What lies behind public acceptance? Comparison of US and French perceptions of the nuclear power option. In: Proceedings of an international conference on the nuclear power option, Vienna, Austria, pp 393–405 Poumadere M, Mays C, Slovic P (1995) What lies behind public acceptance? Comparison of US and French perceptions of the nuclear power option. In: Proceedings of an international conference on the nuclear power option, Vienna, Austria, pp 393–405
go back to reference Riddel M, Schwer KR (2006) Winners, losers, and the nuclear-waste dilemma. Environmental & Resources Economics 34:317–338CrossRef Riddel M, Schwer KR (2006) Winners, losers, and the nuclear-waste dilemma. Environmental & Resources Economics 34:317–338CrossRef
go back to reference Rogers GO (1985) On determining public acceptability of risk. In: Whipple C, Covello V (eds) Risk analysis in the private sector. Plenum Press, New York, pp 483–504 Rogers GO (1985) On determining public acceptability of risk. In: Whipple C, Covello V (eds) Risk analysis in the private sector. Plenum Press, New York, pp 483–504
go back to reference Salihoglu S, Karaer F (2004) Ecological risk assessment and problem formulation for Lake Uluabat, a ramsar state in Turkey. Environmental Management 33(6):899–910CrossRef Salihoglu S, Karaer F (2004) Ecological risk assessment and problem formulation for Lake Uluabat, a ramsar state in Turkey. Environmental Management 33(6):899–910CrossRef
go back to reference Siegrist M (2000) The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology. Risk Analysis 20(2):195–203CrossRef Siegrist M (2000) The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology. Risk Analysis 20(2):195–203CrossRef
go back to reference Siegrist M, Keller C, Kiers HAL (2005) A new look at the psychometric paradigm of perception of hazards. Risk Analysis 20(1):211–222CrossRef Siegrist M, Keller C, Kiers HAL (2005) A new look at the psychometric paradigm of perception of hazards. Risk Analysis 20(1):211–222CrossRef
go back to reference Sjöberg L (2001) Limits of knowledge and the limited importance of trust. Risk Analysis 21(1):189–198CrossRef Sjöberg L (2001) Limits of knowledge and the limited importance of trust. Risk Analysis 21(1):189–198CrossRef
go back to reference Sjöberg L (2004) Local acceptance of a high-level nuclear waste repository. Risk Analysis 24(3):737–749CrossRef Sjöberg L (2004) Local acceptance of a high-level nuclear waste repository. Risk Analysis 24(3):737–749CrossRef
go back to reference Sjöberg L (2006) Nuclear waste risk perceptions and attitudes in siting a final repository for spent nuclear fuel. In: Andersson K (ed) VALDOR proceedings, Stockholm, Sweden, pp 452–460 Sjöberg L (2006) Nuclear waste risk perceptions and attitudes in siting a final repository for spent nuclear fuel. In: Andersson K (ed) VALDOR proceedings, Stockholm, Sweden, pp 452–460
go back to reference Slovic P (1997) Trust, emotion, sex, politics and science: surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. In: Bazerman M, Messick D, Tenbrunsel A, Wade-Benzoni K (eds) Environment, ethics and behavior. The New Lexington Press, San Francisco, pp 277–313 Slovic P (1997) Trust, emotion, sex, politics and science: surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. In: Bazerman M, Messick D, Tenbrunsel A, Wade-Benzoni K (eds) Environment, ethics and behavior. The New Lexington Press, San Francisco, pp 277–313
go back to reference Slovic P (2000) The perception of risk. In: Risk, society and policy series. Earthscan Publications Ltd, London, Sterling Slovic P (2000) The perception of risk. In: Risk, society and policy series. Earthscan Publications Ltd, London, Sterling
go back to reference Slovic P, Feischhoff B, Lichtenstein S (1980) Facts and fears: understanding perceived risk. In: Schwing RC, Albers WA (eds) Societal risk assessment: how safe is safe enough? Springer Press, New York, pp 181–216 Slovic P, Feischhoff B, Lichtenstein S (1980) Facts and fears: understanding perceived risk. In: Schwing RC, Albers WA (eds) Societal risk assessment: how safe is safe enough? Springer Press, New York, pp 181–216
go back to reference Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E (2004) Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis 24(2):311–322CrossRef Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E (2004) Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis 24(2):311–322CrossRef
go back to reference Smith VK (2008) Risk perceptions, optimism, and natural hazards. Risk Analysis 28(6):1763–1767CrossRef Smith VK (2008) Risk perceptions, optimism, and natural hazards. Risk Analysis 28(6):1763–1767CrossRef
go back to reference Tsunoda K (2002) Difference in the formation of attitude toward nuclear power. Political Psychology 23(1):191–201CrossRef Tsunoda K (2002) Difference in the formation of attitude toward nuclear power. Political Psychology 23(1):191–201CrossRef
go back to reference Venkatachalam L (2006) The contingent valuation method: a review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 24:89–124CrossRef Venkatachalam L (2006) The contingent valuation method: a review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 24:89–124CrossRef
go back to reference Viscusi WK, Aldy JE (2003) The value of a statistical life: a critical review of market estimates throughout the world. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 27(1):1573–1576CrossRef Viscusi WK, Aldy JE (2003) The value of a statistical life: a critical review of market estimates throughout the world. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 27(1):1573–1576CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Public Perception of Blue-Algae Bloom Risk in Hongze Lake of China
Authors
Lei Huang
Kai Sun
Jie Ban
Jun Bi
Publication date
01-05-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Environmental Management / Issue 5/2010
Print ISSN: 0364-152X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1009
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9480-8

Other articles of this Issue 5/2010

Environmental Management 5/2010 Go to the issue