Top

Environmental Management

Published in:

01-05-2010

Resident Motivations and Willingness-to-Pay for Urban Biodiversity Conservation in Guangzhou (China)

Authors: Wendy Y. Chen, C. Y. Jim

Published in: Environmental Management | Issue 5/2010

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

The monetary assessment of biodiversity measures the welfare damages brought by biodiversity losses and the cost-benefit analysis of conservation projects in a socio-economic context. The contingent valuation method could include motivational factors to strengthen economic analysis of nature conservation. This study analyzed Guangzhou residents’ motivations and willingness-to-pay (WTP) for an urban biodiversity conservation program in the National Baiyun Mountain Scenic Area (BMSA). The peri-urban natural site, offering refuge to some endemic species, is under increasing development pressures for recreational and residential use. A questionnaire survey was conducted in the Guangzhou metropolitan area during June to October 2007. We interviewed face-to-face 720 stratified sampled households to probe residents’ attitudes towards the city’s environmental issues, motivations for urban nature conservation, and WTP for biodiversity conservation. Principal component analysis identified five motivational factors, including environmental benefit, ecological diversity, nature-culture interaction, landscape-recreation function, and intergenerational sustainability, which illustrated the general economic values of urban nature. Logistic regression was applied to predict the probability of people being willing to pay for the urban biodiversity conservation in BMSA. The significant predictors of WTP included household income and the factor nature-culture interaction. The median WTP estimated RMB149/household (about US$19.5/household) per year and an aggregate of RMB291 million (approximately US$38.2 million) annually to support the urban conservation project. Including public motivations into contingent valuation presents a promising approach to conduct cost-benefit analysis of public projects in China.

previous article Impacts of Adjacent Land Use and Isolation on Marsh Bird Communities

next article Public Perception of Blue-Algae Bloom Risk in Hongze Lake of China

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Ahmed SU, Gotoh K (2006) Cost-benefit analysis of environmental goods by applying contingent valuation method: some Japanese case studies. Springer, Tokyo, p 159

Ajzen I (1985) From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behaviour. In: Kuhl J, Beckmann J (eds) Action control: from cognition to behaviour. Springer, Berlin, pp 11–39

Ajzen I, Brown TC, Rosenthal LH (1996) Information bias in contingent valuation: effects of personal relevance, quality of information, and motivational orientation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30:43–57CrossRef

Akter S, Brouwer R, Brander L, van Beukering P (2009) Respondent uncertainty in a contingent market for carbon offsets. Ecological Economics 68:1858–1863CrossRef

Alberini A, Rosato P, Longo A, Zanatta V (2005) The effects of information on willingness to pay: a contingent valuation study of S. Erasmo in the lagoon of Venice. In: Krarup S, Russell CS (eds) Environment, information and consumer behaviour. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 219–247

Arrow K, Solow R, Portney PR, Leamer EE, Radner R, Schuman H (1993) Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, US Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, p 66

Aunan K, Pan X-C (2004) Exposure-response functions for health effects of ambient air pollution applicable for China—a meta-analysis. Science of Total Environment 329:3–16CrossRef

Backhaus N (2005) Tourism and nature conservation in Malaysian national parks. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ, p 277

Baiyun Mountain Administrative Bureau (2007) Annual report of the national Baiyun Mountain Scenic Area. Internal document (in Chinese)

Balmford A, Bruner A, Cooper P, Costanza R, Farber S, Green RE, Jenkins M, Jefferiss P, Jessamy V, Madden J, Munro J, Myers N, Naeem S, Paavola J, Rayment M, Rosendo S, Roughgraden J, Trumper K, Turner RK (2002) Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science 297:950–953CrossRef

Barr S (2004) Are we all environmentalists now? Rhetoric and reality in environmental action. Geoforum 35:231–249CrossRef

Bateman IJ, Willis KG (1999) Valuing environmental preferences: the theory and practice of the contingent valuation method in the US, EU and developing countries. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 668

Bateman IJ, Langford IH, Turner RK, Willis KG, Garrod GD (1995) Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies. Ecological Economics 12:161–179CrossRef

Bateman IJ, Carson RT, Day B, Hanemann M, Hanley N, Hett T, Jones-Lee M, Loomis G, Mourato S, Őzdemiroğlu E, Pearce DW, Sugden R, Swanson J (2002) Economic valuation with stated preference techniques: a manual. Edwaed Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, p 458

Breuste JH (2004) Decision making, planning and design for the conservation of indigenous vegetation within urban development. Landscape and Urban Planning 68:439–452

Brookshire DS, Crocker TD (1981) The advantage of contingent valuation methods for benefit-cost analysis. Public Policy 36:235–252

Buckland ST, Macmillan DC, Duff EI, Hanley N (1999) Estimating mean willingness to pay from dichotomous choice contingent valuation studies. The Statistician 48:109–124

Carson RT, Flores NE, Meade NF (2001) Contingent valuation controversies and evidence. Environmental & Resource Economics 19:173–210CrossRef

Chen S (2000) Urbanization in China. Urban Problems 93:3–5 (in Chinese)

Chen WY, Jim CY (2006) Valuation of nature: economic contribution of periurban protected areas in Guangzhou Baiyun Mountain Scenic Area. In: Jim CY, Corlett RT (eds) Sustainable management of protected areas for future generations. World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland, pp 59–75

Chen C, Chen X, Zhen J (2008) Impact of real estate development on landscape ecology of north Guangzhou. Tropical Geography 28:161–165 (in Chinese)

China Environmental Awareness Program (2008) 2007 national environmental public awareness survey. World Environment 2:72–77 (in Chinese)

Christie M, Hanley N, Warren J, Murphy K, Wright R, Hyde T (2006) Valuing the diversity of biodiversity. Ecological Economics 58:304–317CrossRef

Cooper P, Poe GL, Bateman IJ (2004) The structure of motivation for contingent values: a case study of lake water quality improvement. Ecological Economics 50:69–82CrossRef

Crompton JL (2001) Parks and economic development. America Planning Association. Planning Advisory Service, Washington, DC

Cummings RG, Brookshire DS, Schulze WD (1986) Valuing environmental goods: an assessment of the contingent valuation method. Rowman and Allanheld, Totawa, NJ, p 270

Davison A, Ridder B (2006) Turbulent times for urban nature: conserving and re-inventing nature in Australian cities. Australian Zoologist 33:306–314

Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (2002) Survey of public attitudes to quality of life and to the environment-2001. London

Dunn RR, Gavin MC, Sanchez MC, Solomon JN (2006) The pigeon paradox: dependence of global conservation on urban nature. Conservation Biology 20:1814–1816CrossRef

Edmonds RL (1999) The environment in the People’s Republic of China 50 years on. China Quarterly 159:640–649CrossRef

Edwards PJ, Abivardi C (1998) The value of biodiversity: where ecology and economy blend. Biological Conservation 83:239–246CrossRef

Evans J (2004) What is local about local environmental governance? Observations from the local biodiversity action planning process. Area 36:270–279CrossRef

FAO Information Division (2000) Applications of the contingent valuation method in developing countries: a survey. FAO Economic and Social Development Paper, 146

Faul AK (2008) Increasing interactions with nature: a survey of expectations on a university campus. Urban Habitats 5:58–82

Garrod G, Willis KG (1999) Economic valuation of the environment: methods and case studies. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, p 384

Gong Y (2004) Distribution of benefits and costs among stakeholders of a protected area: an empirical study from China. Research report no. 2004-RR3, Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia, Singapore

Goode DA (1989) Urban nature conservation in Britain. Journal of Applied Ecology 26:859–873CrossRef

Guangdong Census Office (2002) Tabulation on the 2000 population census of Guangdong province (Guangzhou). Guangdong Economic Press, Guangzhou (in Chinese)

Guangzhou Municipal Statistics Bureau (2007) Guangzhou Statistical Yearbook. China Statistics Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

Hanemann WM (1985) Some issues in continuous- and discrete-response contingent valuation studies. Northeastern Journal of Agricultural Economics 14:5–13

Hanemann WM (1989) Welfare evaluation in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses data: reply. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71:1057–1061CrossRef

Hanemann WM, Kriström B (1995) Preference uncertainty, optimal designs and spikes. In: Johansson P-O, Kriström B, Mäler K-G (eds) Current issues in environmental economics. Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp 58–77

Hanemann WM, Loomis J, Kanninen B (1991) Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73:1255–1263CrossRef

Huhtala A (2004) What price recreation in Finland? A contingent valuation study of non-market benefits of public outdoor recreation areas. Journal of Leisure Research 36:23–44

Jakobsson KM, Dragun AK (1996) Contingent valuation and endangered species: methodological issues and applications. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, p 269

Jim CY, Chen WY (2006) Recreation-amenity use and contingent valuation of urban green spaces in Guangzhou, China. Landscape and Urban Planning 75:81–96CrossRef

Jorgensen BS, Syme GJ (2000) Protest responses and willingness to pay: attitude toward paying for stormwater pollution abatement. Ecological Economics 33:251–265CrossRef

Jorgensen BS, Syme GJ, Bishop BJ, Nancarrow BE (1999) Protest responses in contingent valuation. Environmental & Resource Economics 14:131–150CrossRef

Kendle T, Forbes S (1997) Urban nature conservation. E and FN Spon, London, p 352

Lewan L, Söderqvist T (2002) Knowledge and recognition of ecosystem services among the general public in a drainage basin in Scania, Southern Sweden. Ecological Economics 42:459–467CrossRef

Liang XF, Chen GZ, Chen XL, Yue PQ (2008) Threatened fishes in the world: Tanichthys albonubes Lin 1932 (Cyprinidae). Environmental Biology of Fishes 82:177–178CrossRef

Lin SY (1932) New cyprinid fishes from White Cloud Mountain. Lingnan Science Journal 11:379–383

Liu J, Diamond J (2005) China’s environment in a globalizing world. Nature 435:1179–1186CrossRef

Loomis J, Ekstrand E (1998) Alternative approaches for incorporating respondent uncertainty when estimating willingness to pay: the case of the Mexican Spotted Owl. Ecological Economics 27:29–41CrossRef

Luo Y, Deng J (2008) The new environmental paradigm and nature-based tourism motivation. Journal of Travel Research 46:392–402CrossRef

Macmillan D, Hanley N, Buckland S (1996) A contingent valuation study of uncertain environmental gains. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 43:519–533CrossRef

Martine G (2007) The state of the world population 2007. United Nations Population Fund, New York

Menzel S, Scarpa R (2005) Protection motivation theory and contingent valuation: perceived realism, threat and WTP estimates for biodiversity protection. FEEM Working Paper No. 26.05

Miller JR, Hobbs RJ (2002) Conservation where people live and work. Conservation Biology 16:330–337CrossRef

Mitchell RC, Carson RT (1989) Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, p 463

Morrison MD, Blamey RK, Bennett JW (2000) Minimising payment vehicle bias in contingent valuation studies. Environmental & Resource Economics 16:407–422CrossRef

Murphy DD (1988) Challenges to biological diversity in urban areas. In: Wilson EO, Peter FM (eds) Biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 71–76

National Bureau of Statistics of China (2008) Communiqué on national economy and social development in 2007. Accessed on line August 15, 2008: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjgb/ndtjgb/qgndtjgb/t20080228_402464933.htm (in Chinese)

Paradiso M, Trisorio A (2001) The effect of knowledge on the disparity between hypothetical and real willingness to pay. Applied Economics 33:1359–1364CrossRef

Pearce DW (1999) Economics and biodiversity conservation in the developing world. Environment and Development Economics 4:203–236CrossRef

Pearce DW (2007) Do we really care about biodiversity? Environmental & Resource Economics 37:313–333CrossRef

Pouta E, Rekola M, Kuuluvainen J, Tahvonen O, Li C-Z (2000) Contingent valuation of the Natura 2000 nature conservation programme in Finland. Forestry 73:119–128CrossRef

Qu G (2000) Dream and expectation: past and future of China’s environment. China Environmental Science Press, Beijing, p 287

Rudzitis G, Johansen H (1991) How important is wilderness? Results from a United States survey. Environmental Management 15:227–233CrossRef

Shyamsundar P (1997) Benefit–cost analysis as a mechanism for evaluating conservation policies in developing countries. Environment and Development Economics 2:195–221CrossRef

Spash CL (2000) Ethical motives and charitable contributions in contingent valuation: empirical evidence from social psychology and economics. Environmental Values 9:453–479CrossRef

Spash CL, Urama K, Burton R, Kenyon W, Shannon P, Hill G (2009) Motives behind willingness to pay for improving biodiversity in a water ecosystem: economics, ethics and social psychology. Ecological Economics 68:955–964CrossRef

Thompson CW (2002) Urban open space in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning 60:59–72CrossRef

Turner WR, Nakamura T, Dinetti M (2004) Global urbanization and the separation of humans from nature. BioScience 54:585–590CrossRef

Uliczka H, Angelstam P, Jansson G, Bro A (2004) Non-industrial private forest owners’ knowledge of and attitudes towards nature conservation. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 19:274–288CrossRef

UN-HABITAT (2006) The state of the world’s cities report. Earthscan, London

Uysal MC, Jurowski F, McDonald C (1994) Environmental attitude by trip and visitor characteristics. Tourism Management 15:284–294CrossRef

Veisten K (2007) Contingent valuation controversies: philosophic debates about economic theory. Journal of Socio-Economics 36:204–232CrossRef

Wainger LA, King DM, Cantrell JA, Bird SL (2004) Development of indicators to assess economic vulnerabilities to changes in ecosystem services: case study of counties in Maryland, USA. Environmental Management 34:730–747CrossRef

Walpole MJ, Goodwin HJ (2001) Local attitudes towards conservation and tourism around Komodo National Park, Indonesia. Environmental Conservation 28:160–166CrossRef

Wang X (1996) The effects of urbanization on biodiversity. Rural Eco-environment 12:32–36 (in Chinese)

Wang G, Xiong B (2005) The sustainable development of Guangzhou Baiyun Mountain Scenic Spot. Guangdong Landscape Architecture 27:38–40 (in Chinese)

Wei Y, Davidson B, Chen D, White R, Li B, Zhang J (2007) Can contingent valuation be used to measure the in situ value of groundwater on the north China plain? Water Resources Management 21:1735–1749CrossRef

Willis K, Garrod G, Scarpa R, Powe N, Lovett A, Bateman I, Hanley N, Macmillan D (2003) The social and environmental benefits of forests in Great Britain. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh

Wilson EO (1984) Biophilia: The human bond with other species. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, p 180

Wolf K (2005) Civic nature valuation: assessments of human functioning and well-being in cities. In: Forging solutions: applying ecological economics to current problems, Proceedings of the 3rd biennial conference of the U.S. Society for Ecological Economics. Earth Economics, Tacoma, WA

World Bank (2001) China: air, land, and water. World Bank, Washington, DC, p 149

Yang Q, Chen Z, Shen H (2002) A study on the indirect valuation of the forest ecosystem in Baiyun Mountain. Ecological Science 21:72–75 (in Chinese)

Yoo SH, Yang HJ (2001) Application of sample selection model to double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation studies. Environmental & Resource Economics 20:1147–1163

Zhou Z (1996) Report of national environmental awareness survey. Environmental Education 2:6–8 (in Chinese)

Zhou K, Ye Y, Liu Q, Liu A, Peng S (2007) Evaluation of ambient air quality in Guangzhou, China. Journal of Environmental Sciences 19:432–437CrossRef

Zhu J (1989) Nature conservation in China. Journal of Applied Ecology 26:825–833CrossRef

Zhu Z, Deng Q, Zhou H, Ouyang T, Kuang Y, Huang N, Qiao Y (2002) Water pollution and degradation in Pearl river Delta, South China. Ambio 31:226–230CrossRef

Title: Resident Motivations and Willingness-to-Pay for Urban Biodiversity Conservation in Guangzhou (China)
Authors: Wendy Y. Chen
C. Y. Jim
Publication date: 01-05-2010
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Environmental Management / Issue 5/2010
Print ISSN: 0364-152X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1009
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9478-2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 5/2010

Understanding the Value of Local Ecological Knowledge and Practices for Habitat Restoration in Human-Altered Floodplain Systems: A Case from Bangladesh

Public Perception of Blue-Algae Bloom Risk in Hongze Lake of China

A Management Tool for Assessing Aquaculture Environmental Impacts in Chilean Patagonian Fjords: Integrating Hydrodynamic and Pellets Dispersion Models

An Integrated Sampling and Analysis Approach for Improved Biodiversity Monitoring

Impacts of Adjacent Land Use and Isolation on Marsh Bird Communities

Guiding Climate Change Adaptation Within Vulnerable Natural Resource Management Systems