Top

Journal of Science Education and Technology

Published in:

13-06-2020

Seeing the Forest through the Trees Using Network Analysis: Exploring Student Responses to Conceptual Physics Questions

Author: Mihwa Park

Published in: Journal of Science Education and Technology | Issue 5/2020

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

This study explored how scientific ideas interacted in college students’ scientific explanations using text analysis techniques and network analysis. A task was given to first-year college students asking them to answer a series of physics questions associated with a computer simulation. Students’ written responses were classified into three models—non-normative, mixed, and normative—and then subjected to text analysis using IBM SPSS Modeler with text analytics software. Using the text analysis result, a decision tree model was applied to find what ideas were significantly attributed to the different models of responses. Finally, network analysis was used to reveal and illustrate how the important attributes were used and connected with each other across the three models. The findings support the importance of teaching a small number of core ideas as the premise of the Framework for K-12 Science Education, and indicates that integrated knowledge should emphasize organizing knowledge around the core ideas.

previous article Perceptions of Video Scenarios to Learn Human Pathophysiology Among Undergraduate Science Students

next article Cognition, Attitude, and Interest in Cross-Disciplinary i-STEM Robotics Curriculum Developed by Thematic Integration Approaches of Webbed and Threaded Models: a Concurrent Embedded Mixed Methods Study

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Available only for authorised users

Brown, N. J. S., Furtak, E. M., Timms, M., Nagashima, S. O., & Wilson, M. (2010). The evidence-based reasoning framework: assessing scientific reasoning. Educational Assessment, 15(3–4), 123–141.

Chabalengula, V. M., Sanders, M., & Mumba, F. (2012). Diagnosing students’ understanding of energy and its related concepts in biological context. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(2), 241–266.

Chen, C. C., Lin, H. S., & Lin, M. L. (2002). Developing a two-tier diagnostic instrument to assess high school students' understanding-the formation of images by a plane mirror. Proceedings-National Science Council Republic of China Part D Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 12(3), 106–121.

Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving: advances in the psychology of human intelligence (pp. 1–75). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

Clough, E. E., & Driver, R. (1985). Secondary students’ conceptions of the conduction of heat: bringing together scientific and personal views. Physics Education, 20(4), 176–182.

Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124–130.

de Jong, T., & van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 179–201.

Ding, L., Chabay, R., & Sherwood, B. (2013). How do students in an innovative principle-based mechanics course understand energy concepts? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(6), 722–747.

diSessa, A. A. (2002). Why “conceptual ecology” is a good idea. In M. Limon & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: issues in theory and practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Duit, R. (1981). Students’ notions about the energy concept—before and after physics instruction. In W. Jung, H. Pfundt, & C. von Rhoneck (Eds.), Proceedings of the international workshop on “problems concerning students’ representation of physics and chemistry knowledge” (pp. 268–319). Ludwigsburg: Paedagogische Hochschule.

Duit, R. (1984). Learning the energy concept in school—empirical results from the Philippines and West Germany. Physics Education, 19(1), 59–66.

Duit, R. (2012). Towards a learning progression of energy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Indianapolis, IN.

Gick, M. L. (1986). Problem-solving strategies. Educational Psychologist, 21(1–2), 99–120.

Goldring, H., & Osborne, J. (1994). Students’ difficulties with energy and related concepts. Physics Education, 29(1), 26–31.

Ha, M., Nehm, R. H., Urban-Lurain, M., & Merrill, J. E. (2011). Applying computerized-scoring models of written biological explanations across courses and colleges: prospects and limitations. CBE Life Sciences Education, 10(4), 379–393.

Harrison, A. G., Grayson, D. J., & Treagust, D. F. (1999). Investigating a grade 11 student’s evolving conceptions of heat and temperature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1), 55–87.

Haudek, K. C., Prevost, L. B., Moscarella, R. A., Merrill, J., & Urban-Lurain, M. (2012). What are they thinking? Automated analysis of student writing about acid-base chemistry in introductory biology. CBE Life Sciences Education, 11(3), 283–293.

Lee, R. P. (2016). Misconceptions and biases in German students’ perception of multiple energy sources: implications for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 38(6), 1036–1056.

Lee, H.-S., & Liu, O. L. (2009). Assessing learning progression of energy concepts across middle school grades: the knowledge integration perspective. Science Education, 94(4), 665–688.

Lijnse, P. (1990). Energy between the life-world of pupils and the world of physics. Science Education, 75(5), 571–583.

Linn, M. C. (2006). The knowledge integration perspective on learning and instruction. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of: the learning sciences (pp. 243–264). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Linn, M. C., & Eylon, B. S. (2006). Science education: integrating views of learning and instruction. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of education psychology (2nd ed., pp. 511–544). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Linn, M. C., Clark, D., & Slotta, J. D. (2003). WISE design for knowledge integration. Science Education, 87(4), 517–538.

Liu, X., & McKeough, A. (2005). Development growth in student’s concept of energy: analysis of selected items from the TIMSS database. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(5), 493–517.

Liu, X., & Park, M. (2012). Progression of students’ understanding of the energy concept. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Indianapolis.

Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Klagenfurt: Monograph. Available at: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173.

National Research Council. (1999). How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning. J.D. Bransford, A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking (Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Research Council. (2014). Developing assessments for the Next Generation Science Standards. Committee on Developing Assessments of Science Proficiency in K-12. In W. J. W. Pellegrino, M. R. Wilson, J. A. Koenig, & A. S. Beatty (Eds.), Board on testing and assessment and board on science education. Division of behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Nehm, R., & Schonfeld, I. (2008). Measuring knowledge of natural selection: a comparison of the CINS, an open-response instrument, and an oral interview. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(10), 1131–1160.

Neumann, K., Viering, T., Boone, W. J., & Fischer, H. E. (2013). Towards a learning progression of energy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(2), 162–188.

NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: for states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Pandya, R., & Pandya, J. (2015). C5.0 algorithm to improved decision tree with feature selection and reduced error pruning. International Journal of Computers and Applications, 117(16), 18–21.

Pang, S., & Gong, J. (2009). C5.0 classification algorithm and application on individual credit evaluation of banks. Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice, 29(12), 94–104.

Park, M. (2019) Effects of simulation-based formative assessments on students’ conceptions in physics. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/103586.

Park, M., & Liu, X. (2016). Assessing understanding of the energy concept in different science disciplines. Science Education, 100(3), 483–516.

Park, M., & Liu, X. (2019). An Investigation of item difficulties in energy aspects across biology, chemistry, environmental science, and physics. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9819-y.

Park, M., Liu, X., & Waight, N. (2017). Development of the connected chemistry as formative assessment pedagogy for high school chemistry teaching. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(3), 273–281.

Paul, A., Podolefsky, N., Reid, S., Dubson, M., Gruneich, B., Loeblein, P., Moore, E. B., Perkins, K., Siman-Tov, S., & McGarry, A. (n.d). Energy skate park Retrieved from https://phet.colorado.edu/en/simulation/energy-skate-park-basics.

Pellegrino, J. W. (2013). Proficiency in science: assessment challenges and opportunities. Science, 340(6130), 320–323.

Quellmalz, E. S., Timms, M. J., Silberglitt, M. D., & Buckley, B. C. (2012). Science assessments for all: integrating science simulations into balanced state science assessment systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(3), 363–393.

Rutten, N., van Joolingen, W. R., & van der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers in Education, 58(1), 136–153.

Smith, M., Shneiderman, B., Milic-Frayling, N., Mendes Rodrigues, E., Barash, V., Dunne, C., Capone, T., Perer, A., & Gleave, E. (2009). Analyzing (social media) networks with NodeXL. Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Communities and technologies, ACM, 255–264.

Sripathi, K. N., Moscarella, R. A., Yoho, R., You, H.-S., Urban-Lurain, M., Merill, J., & Haudek, K. (2019). Mixed student ideas about mechanisms of human weight loss. CBE-Life Science Education, 3, ar37.

Srisawasdi, N., & Panjaburee, P. (2015). Exploring effectiveness of simulation-based inquiry learning in science with integration of formative assessment. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(3), 323–352.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oakes: Sage Publications.

Tatar, E., & Oktay, M. (2007). Students’ misunderstandings about the energy conservation principle: a general view to studies in literature. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 2(3), 79–81.

Treagust, D. F. (1998). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 159–169.

Trumper, R. (1998). A longitudinal study of physics students’ conceptions on energy in pre-senice training for high school teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7(4), 311–318.

Trundle, K. C., & Bell, R. L. (2010). The use of a computer simulation to promote conceptual change: a quasi-experimental study. Computers in Education, 54(4), 1078–1088.

Tytler, R., & Peterson, S. (2005). A longitudinal study of children’s developing knowledge and reasoning in science. Research in Science Education, 35(1), 63–98.

Watts, D. (1983). Some alternative views of energy. Physics Education, 18(5), 213–217.

Title: Seeing the Forest through the Trees Using Network Analysis: Exploring Student Responses to Conceptual Physics Questions
Author: Mihwa Park
Publication date: 13-06-2020
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: Journal of Science Education and Technology / Issue 5/2020
Print ISSN: 1059-0145
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1839
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09840-w

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 5/2020

How Much Cueing Is Needed in Instructional Animations? The Role of Prior Knowledge

Designing for Relationality in Virtual Reality: Context-Specific Learning as a Primer for Content Relevancy

Perceptions of Video Scenarios to Learn Human Pathophysiology Among Undergraduate Science Students

Cognition, Attitude, and Interest in Cross-Disciplinary i-STEM Robotics Curriculum Developed by Thematic Integration Approaches of Webbed and Threaded Models: a Concurrent Embedded Mixed Methods Study

The Effect of REACT and Computer-Assisted Instruction Model in 5E on Student Achievement of the Subject of Acids, Bases and Salts

Development and Initial Validation of the Student Interest and Choice in STEM (SIC-STEM) Survey 2.0 Instrument for Assessment of the Social Cognitive Career Theory Constructs

Premium Partners