Skip to main content
Top

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Simulation Game Complexity Perception: An Approach to the Research Model

Author : Marcin Wardaszko

Published in: Neo-Simulation and Gaming Toward Active Learning

Publisher: Springer Nature Singapore

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper presents and discusses the research framework of complexity in simulation gaming. The complexity of a simulation game has three dimensions: game systematic complexity, game social complexity, and complex dynamics of gameplay. The author presents two perspectives on the complexity of a simulation game. The first perspective is a designer perspective and game-scoring model proposed by the author to solve the internal model dilemma of interdependence. The second perspective is the player’s perspective and, in this paper, the research model and procedure are described for discussion.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Duke RD (1974) Gaming: the future’s language. Sage, London Duke RD (1974) Gaming: the future’s language. Sage, London
2.
go back to reference Mayer IS (2009) The gaming of policy and the politics of gaming: a review. Simul Gaming 40:825–862CrossRef Mayer IS (2009) The gaming of policy and the politics of gaming: a review. Simul Gaming 40:825–862CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Oțoiu C (2014) Details of complexity. In: Duke RD, Kriz WC (eds) Back to the future of gaming. W. Bertelsmann Verlag, Bielefeld, pp 40–49 Oțoiu C (2014) Details of complexity. In: Duke RD, Kriz WC (eds) Back to the future of gaming. W. Bertelsmann Verlag, Bielefeld, pp 40–49
4.
go back to reference Lukosch HK, Bekebrede G (2014) The future of gaming: challenges for designing distributed games. In: Duke RD, Kriz WC (eds) Back to the future of gaming. W. Bertelsmann Verlag, Bielefeld, pp 142–153 Lukosch HK, Bekebrede G (2014) The future of gaming: challenges for designing distributed games. In: Duke RD, Kriz WC (eds) Back to the future of gaming. W. Bertelsmann Verlag, Bielefeld, pp 142–153
6.
go back to reference Feinstein AH, Cannon HM (2001) Fidelity, verifiability and validity of simulation: constructs for evaluation. Dev Bus Simul Exp Learn 28. www.absel.org Feinstein AH, Cannon HM (2001) Fidelity, verifiability and validity of simulation: constructs for evaluation. Dev Bus Simul Exp Learn 28. www.​absel.​org
7.
go back to reference Feinstein AH, Cannon HM (2002) Constructs of simulation evaluation. Simul Gaming Interdiscip J Theory Pract Res 33(4):425–440 Feinstein AH, Cannon HM (2002) Constructs of simulation evaluation. Simul Gaming Interdiscip J Theory Pract Res 33(4):425–440
9.
go back to reference Van Gigch J (2002) Comparing the epistemologies of scientific disciplines in two distinct domains: modern physics versus social sciences. Syst Res Behav Sci 19(6):551–562CrossRef Van Gigch J (2002) Comparing the epistemologies of scientific disciplines in two distinct domains: modern physics versus social sciences. Syst Res Behav Sci 19(6):551–562CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cannon HM (1995) Dealing with the complexity paradox in business simulation games. Dev Bus Simul Exp Exerc 22:96–102 Cannon HM (1995) Dealing with the complexity paradox in business simulation games. Dev Bus Simul Exp Exerc 22:96–102
11.
go back to reference Whitton N (2009) Learning with digital games: a practical guide to engaging students in higher education. Routledge, New YorkCrossRef Whitton N (2009) Learning with digital games: a practical guide to engaging students in higher education. Routledge, New YorkCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Meijer SA (2015) The power of sponges: comparing high-tech and low-tech gaming for innovation. Simul Gaming Interdiscip J Theory Pract Res 46(5):512–535 Meijer SA (2015) The power of sponges: comparing high-tech and low-tech gaming for innovation. Simul Gaming Interdiscip J Theory Pract Res 46(5):512–535
13.
go back to reference Klabbers JHG (2000) Learning to handle complexity in social systems. In: McCarthy IP, Rakotobe Joel T (eds) Proceedings of the international conference on complexity and complex systems in industry. University of Warwick, Warwick, pp 616–638 Klabbers JHG (2000) Learning to handle complexity in social systems. In: McCarthy IP, Rakotobe Joel T (eds) Proceedings of the international conference on complexity and complex systems in industry. University of Warwick, Warwick, pp 616–638
14.
go back to reference Klabbers JHG (2006) A framework for artifact assessment and theory testing. Simul Gaming Interdiscip J Theory Pract Res 37:155–173 Klabbers JHG (2006) A framework for artifact assessment and theory testing. Simul Gaming Interdiscip J Theory Pract Res 37:155–173
15.
go back to reference Klabbers JHG (2006) The magic circle: principles of gaming & simulation, vol 1. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam Klabbers JHG (2006) The magic circle: principles of gaming & simulation, vol 1. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam
16.
go back to reference Girard C, Ecalle J, Magnan A (2012) Serious games as new educational tools: how effective are they? A meta-analysis of recent studies. J Comput Assist Learn 29:207–219CrossRef Girard C, Ecalle J, Magnan A (2012) Serious games as new educational tools: how effective are they? A meta-analysis of recent studies. J Comput Assist Learn 29:207–219CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bekebrede G, Lo J, Lukosch HK (2015) Understanding complex systems through mental models and shared experiences: a case study. Simul Gaming Interdiscip J Theory Pract Res 46:536–562 Bekebrede G, Lo J, Lukosch HK (2015) Understanding complex systems through mental models and shared experiences: a case study. Simul Gaming Interdiscip J Theory Pract Res 46:536–562
18.
go back to reference Lankveld G, Sehic E, Lo JC, Meijer SA (2016) Assessing gaming simulation validity for training traffic controllers. Simul Gaming Interdiscip J Theory Pract Res 48(2):219–235 Lankveld G, Sehic E, Lo JC, Meijer SA (2016) Assessing gaming simulation validity for training traffic controllers. Simul Gaming Interdiscip J Theory Pract Res 48(2):219–235
20.
go back to reference Sterman J (2015) Learning for ourselves: interactive simulations to catalyze science-based environmental activism. In: Stoknes PE, Eliassen KA (eds) Science-based activism. Bergen, Fagbokfolaget, pp 253–279 Sterman J (2015) Learning for ourselves: interactive simulations to catalyze science-based environmental activism. In: Stoknes PE, Eliassen KA (eds) Science-based activism. Bergen, Fagbokfolaget, pp 253–279
22.
go back to reference Burgess TF (1995) Cycle time, decisions, and complexity in business simulation/games. Simul Gaming Interdiscip J Theory Pract Res 26(3):376–383 Burgess TF (1995) Cycle time, decisions, and complexity in business simulation/games. Simul Gaming Interdiscip J Theory Pract Res 26(3):376–383
23.
go back to reference Boumas M (1999) Built-in-justification. In: Morgan MS, Morrison M (eds) Models as mediators. Perspectives on natural and social sciences. Cambridge University Press, New York Boumas M (1999) Built-in-justification. In: Morgan MS, Morrison M (eds) Models as mediators. Perspectives on natural and social sciences. Cambridge University Press, New York
24.
go back to reference Cook TD, Campbell DT (1979) Quasi-experimentation: design and analysis issues for field settings. Houghton Mifflin, Boston Cook TD, Campbell DT (1979) Quasi-experimentation: design and analysis issues for field settings. Houghton Mifflin, Boston
25.
go back to reference Creswell JW (2014) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches, 4th edn. Sage, Los Angeles Creswell JW (2014) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches, 4th edn. Sage, Los Angeles
Metadata
Title
Simulation Game Complexity Perception: An Approach to the Research Model
Author
Marcin Wardaszko
Copyright Year
2019
Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8039-6_45

Premium Partner