Top

Neural Computing and Applications

Published in:

01-03-2012 | Swam Intelligence

Swarm-intelligent foraging in honeybees: benefits and costs of task-partitioning and environmental fluctuations

Authors: Thomas Schmickl, Ronald Thenius, Karl Crailsheim

Published in: Neural Computing and Applications | Issue 2/2012

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

For honeybee colonies, it is crucial to collect nectar in an efficient way. Empiric experiments showed that the process of decision making, which allows the colony to select the optimal nectar source, is based on individual decisions. These decisions are made by returning nectar foragers, which alter their dancing behaviours based on the nectar source’s quality and based on the experienced search time for a receiver bee. Nectar receivers, which represent a shared limited resource for foragers, can modulate the foraging decisions performed by the colony. We investigated the interplay between foragers and receivers by using a multi-agent simulation. Therefore, we implemented agents which are capable of a limited set of behaviours and which spend energy according to their behaviour. In simulation experiments, we tested colonies with various receiver-to-forager ratios and measured colony-level results like the emerging foraging patterns and the colony’s net honey gain. We show that the number of receivers prominently regulates the foraging workforce. All tested environmental fluctuations are predicted to cause energetic costs for the colony. Task-partitioning additionally influences the colony’s decision-making concerning the question whether or not the colony sticks to a nectar source after environmental fluctuations.

previous article An inertia-adaptive particle swarm system with particle mobility factor for improved global optimization

next article Robust large margin discriminant tangent analysis for face recognition

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Sumpter DJT, Pratt SC (2003) A modeling framework for understanding social insect foraging. Behav Ecol Sociobiol (53):131–144

Bartholdi JJ, Seeley TD, Tovey C, Vate JV (1992) The pattern and effectiveness of forager allocation among flower patches in honey bee colonies. J Theor Biol 160:23–40CrossRef

Seeley TD, Camazine S, Sneyd J (1991) Collective decision-making in honey bees: how colonies choose among nectar sources. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28(4):277–290CrossRef

Cox MD, Myerscough MR (2003) A flexible model of foraging by a honey bee colony: the effects of individual behaviour on foraging success. J Theor Biol 223:179–197

de Vries H, Biesmeijer JC (2002) Self-organization in collective honeybee foraging: emergence of symmetry breaking, cross inhibition and equal harvest-rate distribution. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51(6):557–569CrossRef

de Vries H, Biesmeijer JC (1998) Modelling collective foraging by means of individual behaviour rules in honey-bees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 44:109–124CrossRef

Anderson C, Ratnieks FLW (1999) Task partitioning in insect societies. I. Effect of colony size on queueing delay and colony ergonomic efficiency. Am Nat 154:521–535CrossRef

Ratnieks FLW, Anderson C (1999) Task partitioning in insect societies II: use of queueing delay information in recruitment. Am Nat 154(5): 536–548CrossRef

von Frisch K (1965) Tanzsprache und Orientierung der Bienen. Springer, Berlin

10.

Seeley TD (1992) The tremble dance of the honey bee: message and meanings. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31:375–383CrossRef

11.

Seeley TD, Camazine S, Sneyd J (1991) Collective decision-making in honey bees: how colonies choose among nectar sources. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28(4):277–290CrossRef

12.

Grüter C, Farina WM (2009) The honeybee waggle dance: can we follow the steps? Trends Ecol Evol 24(5):242–247CrossRef

13.

Seeley TD (1994) Honey bee foragers as sensory units of their colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 34:51–62CrossRef

14.

Schmid-Hempel P, Kacelnik A, Houston AI (1985) Honeybees maximize efficiency by not filling their crop. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:61–66CrossRef

15.

Johnson BR (2003) Organization of work in the honeybee: a compromise between division of labour and behavioural flexibility. Proc Royal Soc Lond B 270(1511):147–152CrossRef

16.

Seeley TD (1982) Adaptive significance of the age polyethism schedule in honeybee colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:287–293CrossRef

17.

Johnson BR (2002) Reallocation of labor in honeybee colonies during heat stress: the relative roles of task switching and the activation of reserve labor. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:188–196CrossRef

18.

Schmickl T, Crailsheim K Hopomo (2007) A model of honeybee intracolonial population dynamics and resource management. Ecol Model 204(1–2): 219–245CrossRef

19.

Schmickl T, Crailsheim K (2001) Cannibalism and early capping: strategy of honeybee colonies in times of experimental pollen shortages. J Comp Physiol A 187(7):541–547CrossRef

20.

Seeley TD (1992) The tremble dance of the honey bee: message and meanings. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31:375–383CrossRef

21.

Seeley TD (1989) Social foraging in honey bees: how nectar foragers assess their colonys nutritional status. Behav Ecol and Sociobiol 24:181–199CrossRef

22.

Schmickl T, Thenius R, Crailsheim K (2005) Simulating swarm intelligence in honeybees: foraging in differently fluctuating environments. In: Proceedings of the genetic and evolutionary computation conference (GECCO) 2005, Washington, DC, pp 273–274

23.

Schmickl T, Crailsheim K (2004) Costs of environmental fluctuations and benefits of dynamic decentralized foraging decisions in honey bees. Adapt Behav Anim Anim Software Agents Rob Adapt Syst 12:263–277

24.

Thenius R, Schmickl T, Crailsheim K (2006) Economic optimisation in honeybees: adaptive behaviour of a superorganism. In: Nolfi S, Baldassarre G, Calabretta R, Hallam JCT, Marocco D, Meyer JA, Miglino O, Parisi D (eds) From animals to animats 9: 9th international conference on simulation of adaptive behavior, SAB 2006. Volume 4095 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (LNAI). Springer, Berlin, pp 725–737

25.

Russell SJ, Norvig P (1995) Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsMATH

26.

Bonabeau E, Dorigo M, Theraulaz G (1999) Swarm intelligence: from natural to artificial systems. Oxford University Press, OxfordMATH

27.

Thenius R, Schmickl T, Crailsheim K (2005) The dance or work problem: why do not all honeybees dance with maximum intensity. Lect Notes Artif Intell 3690:246–255

28.

Seeley TD (1995) The wisdom of the hive: the social physiology of honey bee colonies. Havard University Press, Cambridge

29.

Huang M, Seeley TD (2003) Multiple unloadings by nectar foragers in honey bees: a matter of information improvement or crop fullness?. Insectes Sociaux 50:330–339CrossRef

30.

Castro L (2007) Fundamentals of natural computing: an overview. Phys Life Rev 4(1):1–36CrossRef

31.

Anderson C (1998) Simulation of the feedbacks and regulation of recruitment dancing in honey bees. Adv Compl Syst 1:267–282CrossRef

32.

Gregson A, Hart A, Holcombe M, Ratnieks F (2003) Partial nectar loads as a cause of multiple nectar transfer in the honey bee (apis mellifera): a simulation model. J Theor Biol 222(1): 1–8CrossRef

33.

Schmickl T, Crailsheim K (2008) Analysing honeybees’ division of labour in broodcare by a multi-agent model. In: Bullock S, Noble J, Watson R, Bedau MA (eds) Artificial life XI: proceedings of the eleventh international conference on the simulation and synthesis of living systems, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 529–536

34.

Schmickl T, Crailsheim K (2008) An individual-based model of task selection in honeybees. In: Goebel R, Siekmann J, Wahlster W (eds) From animals to animats 10. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 5040, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 383–392

35.

Schmickl T, Crailsheim K (2008) Taskselsim: a model of the self-organization of the division of labour in honeybees. Math Comput Model Dyn Syst 14:101–125MATHCrossRef

36.

Thenius R, Schmickl T, Crailsheim K (2008) Optimisation of a honeybee-colony’s energetics via social learning based on queuing delays. Connect Sci 20(2):193–210CrossRef

37.

Wedde HF, Farooq M, Pannenbaecker T, Vogel B, Mueller C, Meth J, Jeruschkat R (2005) Beeadhoc: an energy efficient routing algorithm for mobile ad hoc networks inspired by bee behavior. In: GECCO ’05: proceedings of the 2005 conference on genetic and evolutionary computation. ACM, New York, pp 153–160

38.

Wedde HF, Farooq M, Zhang Y (2004) Beehive: An efficient fault-tolerant routing algorithm inspired by honey bee behavior. In: Lecture notes in computer science. Number 3172, Springer, Berlin, pp 83–94

39.

Tovey C (2004) The honey bee algorithm: a biological inspired approach to internet server optimization. Engineering Enterprise, Spring, pp 13–15

40.

Pham D, Ghanbarzadeh A, Koc E, Otri S, Rahim S, Zaidi M (2006) The bees algorithm, a novel tool for complex optimisation problems. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international virtual conference on intelligent production machines and systems (IPROMS 2006), Elsevier, pp 454–459

41.

Dorigo M, Stützle T (2004) Ant colony optimization (Bradford Books). The MIT Press, CambridgeCrossRef

42.

Dorigo M, Bonabeau E, Theraulaz G (2000) Ant algorithms and stigmergy. Future Gener Comput Syst 16(9):851–871CrossRef

43.

Bonabeau E, Henaux F, Guérin S, Snyers D, Kuntz P, Theraulaz G (January 1998) Routing in telecommunications networks with “smart” ant-like agents. Working papers 98-01-003, Santa Fe Institute

44.

Sugawara K, Kazama T, Watanabe T (2004) Foraging behavior of interacting robots with virtual pheromone. In: Proceedings of 2004 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos, pp 3074–3079

45.

Krieger MJB, Billeter JB (2000) The call of duty: self organised task allocation in a population of up to twelve mobile robots. Rob Auton Syst 30:65–84CrossRef

46.

Payton D, Daily M, Estowski R, Howard M, Lee C (2001) Pheromone robotics. Auton Rob 11(3):319–324MATHCrossRef

47.

Payton D, Estkowski R, Howrad M (2005) Pheromonic robotics and the logic of virtual pheromones. Lect Notes Comput Sci 3342:45–57CrossRef

48.

Garnier S, Jost C, Jeanson R, Gautrais J, Asadpour M, Caprari G, Theraulaz G (2005) Aggregation behaviour as a source of collective decision in a group of cockroach-like-robots. In: Capcarrere M (ed) Advances in artificial life: 8th European conference, ECAL 2005. Vol 3630 of LNAI. Springer, Berlin, pp 169–178

49.

Schmickl T, Thenius R, Möslinger C, Radspieler G, Kernbach S, Crailsheim K (2008) Get in touch: cooperative decision making based on robot-to-robot collisions. Auton Agent Multi Agent Syst 18(1):133–155CrossRef

50.

Hamann H, Wörn H, Crailsheim K, Schmickl T (2008) Spatial macroscopic models of a bio-inspired robotic swarm algorithm. In: IEEE/RSJ 2008 international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS’08). IEEE Press, Los Alamitos, pp 1415–1420

51.

Schmickl T, Möslinger C, Thenius R, Crailsheim K (2007) Bio-inspired navigation of autonomous robots in heterogenous environments. Int J Factory Autom Rob Soft Comput 3:164–170

52.

Schmickl T, Möslinger C, Thenius R, Crailsheim K (2007) Individual adaptation allows collective path-finding in a robotic swarm. Int J Factory Autom Rob Soft Comput 4:102–108

53.

Schmickl T, Crailsheim K (2008) Trophallaxis within a robotic swarm: bio-inspired communication among robots in a swarm. Auton Rob 25:171–188CrossRef

Title: Swarm-intelligent foraging in honeybees: benefits and costs of task-partitioning and environmental fluctuations
Authors: Thomas Schmickl
Ronald Thenius
Karl Crailsheim
Publication date: 01-03-2012
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Neural Computing and Applications / Issue 2/2012
Print ISSN: 0941-0643
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3058
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-010-0357-9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 2/2012

Fuzzy isomorphism theorems of soft rings

HYBP_PSSP: a hybrid back propagation method for predicting protein secondary structure

Designing the conflict resolution machinery using game theory–based neural network

Robust large margin discriminant tangent analysis for face recognition

Training twin support vector regression via linear programming

Globally stable adaptive robust tracking control using RBF neural networks as feedforward compensators

Premium Partner