Top

Technology, Knowledge and Learning

Published in:

07-12-2019

Teaching CALL to Pre-service Teachers of English in a Flipped Classroom

Author: Sedat Akayoğlu

Published in: Technology, Knowledge and Learning | Issue 1/2021

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

With the emergence of online tools in education, the search for the new models and approaches has gained importance. Flipped Classroom Model (FCM), in which online and face-to-face instructions are blended and the place of homework and classroom instruction is reversed, is one of the recent models. The purpose of this study is to investigate the perceptions of pre-service teachers of English in Turkey context on FCM and an LMS platform, Google Classroom. The participants of this study were 58 pre-service teachers of English enrolled at a state-run university in Turkey. The findings revealed that the pre-service teachers’ perceptions on FCM were quite positive in terms of motivation, effectiveness, engagement and overall student satisfaction. It was also found that they believed that more time was required to prepare before the class, being prepared was something positive in terms of motivation, each learner had to chance to learn on his/her own pace and learning by doing was encouraged through more practice. As for the platform, Google Classroom was found to be user-friendly, particularly due to its features related to assignment submission and following deadlines. It was also observed that the participants were satisfied with the instructor’s attitude in online platform.

previous article Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Practices in Higher Education: First Impressions of Preservice Teachers

next article Students’ Satisfaction with E-learning Platforms in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Adnan, M. (2017). Perceptions of senior-year ELT students for flipped classroom: A materials development course. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(4), 204–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1301958.CrossRef

Albert, M., & Beatty, B. J. (2014). Flipping the classroom applications to curriculum redesign for an introduction to management course: Impact on grades. Journal of Education for Business, 89(8), 419–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2014.929559.CrossRef

Arslan, R. Ş., & Şahin-Kızıl, A. (2010). How can the use of blog software facilitate the writing process of English language learners? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(3), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.486575.CrossRef

Barkley, E. (2010). Student engagement techniques: A handbook for college faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.

Berrett, D. (2012). How “flipping” the classroom can improve the traditional lecture. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 12, 1–15.

Bliuc, A. M., Goodyear, P., & Ellis, R. A. (2007). Research focus and methodological choices in studies into students’ experiences of blended learning in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 10(4), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.08.001.CrossRef

Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Kinshuk, & Chen, N. S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead? Computers and Education, 79, 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.004.CrossRef

Chen Hsieh, J. S., Wu, W.-C. V., & Marek, M. W. (2017). Using the flipped classroom to enhance EFL learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30, (1–2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1111910.CrossRef

Chi, M. T. H. (2009). Active–constructive–interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 73–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x.CrossRef

Childs, M., Schnieders, H. L., & Williams, G. (2012). “This above all: To thine own self be true”: Ethical considerations and risks in conducting Higher Education learning activities in the virtual world Second Life TM. Interactive Learning Environments, 20, 253–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2011.641679.CrossRef

Chun, D., Smith, B., & Kern, R. (2016). Technology in language use, language teaching, and language learning. Modern Language Journal, 100, 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12302.CrossRef

Coates, H. (2006). Student engagement in campus-based and online education: University connections. London: Routledge.CrossRef

Davis, C. (2013). Flipped or inverted learning: Strategies for course design. In E. G. Smyth & J. X. Volker (Eds.), Enhancing instruction with visual media: Utilizing video and lecture capture (pp. 241–265). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.CrossRef

Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.CrossRef

Dill, E. M. (2012). The impact of flip teaching on student homework completion, behavior, engagement, and proficiency. Armidale: University of New England.

Dizon, G. (2016). A comparative study of Facebook vs. paper-and-pencil writing to improve L2 writing skills. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 9(8), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2016.1266369.CrossRef

Ducate, L., & Lomicka, L. (2009). Podcasting: An effective tool for honing language students’ pronunciation? Language Learning & Technology, 13(3), 66–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.01.CrossRef

Flipped Learning Network (FLN). (2014). The four pillars of F-L-I-P™. Retrieved August 28, 2017, from http://flippedlearning.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Extension-of-FLipped-Learning-LIt-Review-June-2014.pdf.

Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. The Jossey–Bass higher and adult education series. New York: Wiley.

Ginns, P., & Ellis, R. (2007). Quality in blended learning: Exploring the relationships between on-line and face-to-face teaching and learning. Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.10.003.CrossRef

Godwin-Jones, R. (2016). Emerging technologies augmented reality and language learning: From annotated vocabulary to place-based mobile games. Language Learning & Technology, 20(3), 9–19.

Google Suite for Education. (2017). Retrieved August 28, 2017, from https://edu.google.com/products/productivity-tools.

Han, Y. (2015). Successfully flipping the ESL classroom for learner autonomy. NYS TESOL Journal, 2(1), 98–109.

Hao, Y. (2016). Middle school students’ flipped learning readiness in foreign language classrooms: Exploring its relationship with personal characteristics and individual circumstances. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.031.CrossRef

Holmes, K. A., & Prieto-Rodriguez, E. (2018). Student and staff perceptions of a learning management system for blended learning in teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v43n3.2.CrossRef

Hung, H.-T. (2016). Clickers in the flipped classroom: Bring your own device (BYOD) to promote student learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(8), 983–995. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1240090.CrossRef

Hung, H. T. (2017). The integration of a student response system in flipped. Language Learning & Technology, 21(1), 16–27.

Khan, S. (2012). The one world schoolhouse: Education reimagined. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

Kim, M. K., Kim, S. M., Khera, O., & Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: An exploration of design principles. Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.003.CrossRef

Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(3), 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344008000335.CrossRef

Lage, M. J., & Platt, G. (2000). The internet and the inverted classroom. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.2307/1183335.CrossRef

Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.CrossRef

Love, B., Hodge, A., Grandgenett, N., & Swift, A. W. (2014). Student learning and perceptions in a flipped linear algebra course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(3), 317–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.822582.CrossRef

Lund, A. (2008). Wikis: A collective approach to language production. ReCALL, 20(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344008000414.CrossRef

Milman, N. B. (2012). The flipped classroom strategy: What is it and how can it best be used? Distance Learning, 9(3), 85–87.

Moffett, J., & Mill, A. C. (2014). Evaluation of the flipped classroom approach in a veterinary professional skills course. Advances in medical education and practice, 5, 415.CrossRef

Mull B. (2012). Flipped learning: A response to five common criticisms. November Learning. Retrieved December 6, 2019 from https://novemberlearning.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/flipped-learning-a-response-to-five-common-criticisms.pdf.

Nielsen, L. (2012). Five reasons I’m not flipping over the flipped classroom. Technology & Learning, 32(10), 46.

Nishioka, H. (2016). Analysing language development in a collaborative digital storytelling project: Sociocultural perspectives. System, 62, 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.07.001.CrossRef

Nizal, I., Shaharanee, M., Jamil, J. M., Syamimi, S., & Rodzi, M. (2016). The application of Google Classroom as a tool for teaching and learning. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering, 8(10), 8–11.

Novak, G. M. (2011). Just-in-time teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 128, 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.469.CrossRef

O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002.CrossRef

Park, S. Y. (2009). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding University students’ behavioral intention to use e-Learning. Educational Technology and Society, 12(3), 150–162.

Roehl, A., Reddy, S. L., & Shannon, G. J. (2013). The flipped classroom: An opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning strategies. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences, 105(2), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.14307/JFCS105.2.12.CrossRef

Sahin, A., Cavlazoglu, B., & Zeytuncu, Y. E. (2015). Flipping a college calculus course: A case study. Educational Technology and Society, 18(3), 142–152.

Smyth, S., Houghton, C., Cooney, A., & Casey, D. (2012). Students’ experiences of blended learning across a range of postgraduate programmes. Nurse Education Today, 32(4), 464–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2011.05.014.CrossRef

Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4.CrossRef

Suda, K. J., Sterling, J. M., Guirguis, A. B., & Mathur, S. K. (2014). Student perception and academic performance after implementation of a blended learning approach to a drug information and literature evaluation course. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 6(3), 367–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2014.02.017.CrossRef

Thai, N. T. T., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2017). The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: Looking for the best “blend” of lectures and guiding questions with feedback. Computers & Education, 107, 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.003.CrossRef

Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Education Next, 12(1), 2–10.

Turan, Z., & Goktas, Y. (2016). The Flipped Classroom: instructional efficency and impact of achievement and cognitive load levels. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 12(4), 51–62.

Vernadakis, N., Giannousi, M., Derri, V., Michalopoulos, M., & Kioumourtzoglou, E. (2012). The impact of blended and traditional instruction in students’ performance. Procedia Technology, 1, 439–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2012.02.098.CrossRef

Wang, F. H. (2017). An exploration of online behaviour engagement and achievement in flipped classroom supported by learning management system. Computers & Education, 114, 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.012.CrossRef

Yarbro, J., Arfstrom, K. M., McKnight, K., & McKnight, P. (2014). Extension of a review of flipped learning. Retrieved December 6, 2019 from http://flippedlearning.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Extension-of-FLipped-Learning-LIt-Review-June-2014.pdf.

Ziegelmeier, L. B., & Topaz, C. M. (2015). Flipped calculus: A study of student performance and perceptions. PRIMUS, 25(9–10), 847–860. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2015.1031305.CrossRef

Title: Teaching CALL to Pre-service Teachers of English in a Flipped Classroom
Author: Sedat Akayoğlu
Publication date: 07-12-2019
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: Technology, Knowledge and Learning / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 2211-1662
Electronic ISSN: 2211-1670
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-019-09428-3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

A Study Exploring Students’ Usage Patterns and Adoption of Lecture Capture

A Learning Analytics Approach to Address Heterogeneity in the Classroom: The Teachers’ Diagnostic Support System

Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Practices in Higher Education: First Impressions of Preservice Teachers

Social Curation Experience: Towards Authentic Learning in Preservice Teacher Training

Students’ Satisfaction with E-learning Platforms in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Teachers’ Readiness to Adopt Mobile Learning in Classrooms: A Study in Greece

Premium Partners