Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Science Education and Technology
Published in: Journal of Science Education and Technology 3/2021

04-11-2020

The Effects of Scientific Self-efficacy and Cognitive Anxiety on Science Engagement with the “Question-Observation-Doing-Explanation” Model during School Disruption in COVID-19 Pandemic

Authors: Xiantong Yang, Mengmeng Zhang, Lingqiang Kong, Qiang Wang, Jon-Chao Hong

Published in: Journal of Science Education and Technology | Issue 3/2021

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Game-based learning supported by mobile intelligence technology has promoted the renewal of teaching and learning models. Herein, a model of Question-Observation-Doing-Explanation (QODE) based on smart phones was constructed and applied to science learning during school disruption in COVID-19 pandemic. In this study, from the theoretical perspective of cognitive-affective theory of learning with media, Bandura’s motivation theory and community of inquiry model, self-report measure was used to verify the effect of students’ scientific self-efficacy and cognitive anxiety on science engagement. A total of 357 valid questionnaires were used for structural equation model research. The results indicated that two types of scientific self-efficacy, as indicated by scientific learning ability and scientific learning behavior, were negatively associated with cognitive anxiety. In addition, cognitive anxiety was also negatively correlated to four types of science engagement, as indicated by cognitive engagement, emotional engagement, behavioral engagement, and social engagement through smartphone interactions. These findings provide further evidence for game-based learning promoted by smart phones, contributing to a deeper understanding of the associations between scientific self-efficacy, cognitive anxiety, and science engagement. This study points out that the QODE model is suitable for implementing smart mobile devices to students’ science learning.
previous article A Meta-Analysis of Machine Learning-Based Science Assessments: Factors Impacting Machine-Human Score Agreements
next article STEM Teachers’ Preparation, Teaching Beliefs, and Perceived Teaching Competence: a Multigroup Structural Equation Approach

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Literature
Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Assessing metacognition in an online community of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 183–190.
Alvarez, F., & Cerda, E. (2003). Learning by doing in a T-period production planning: analytical solution. European Journal of Operational Research, 150(2), 353–369.
Amanda, J. R., Jillian, W., Mervyn, W., Deanna, N. (2016). The predictive relationship among the community of inquiry framework, perceived learning and online, and graduate students’ course grades in online synchronous and asynchronous courses. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 17(3), 18–35.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.
Bandura, A. (1989). Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy. Developmental Psychology, 25(5), 729–735.
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148.
Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 41(3), 586–598.
Bauer, and Julius. (1965). Definition(s) of anxiety. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 191(5), 420.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606.
Bless, H. (2000). The interplay of affect and cognition: The mediating role of general knowledge structures. In J. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 201–222). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Branko, S. (2001). The syndrome of burnout, self-image, and anxiety with grammar school students. Horizons of Psychology, 10(2), 21–32.
Brígido, M., Borrachero, A. B., Bermejo, M. L., Mellado, V. (2013). Prospective primary teachers’ self-efficacy and emotions in science teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education, 36(2), 200–217.
Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 485–499.
Brom, C., Buchtova, M., Sisler, V., Dechterenko, F., Palme, R., Glenk, L. M. (2014). Flow social interaction anxiety and salivary cortisol responses in serious games: a quasi-experimental study. Computers & Education, 79, 69–100.
Browne, M. W., Maccallum, R. C., Kim, C. T., Andersen, B. L., Glaser, R. (2002). When fit indices and residuals are incompatible. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 403–421.
Burton, D. (1998). Measuring competitive state anxiety. In J. L. Duda (Ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement (pp. 129–148). Morgantown: Fitness Information Technology Inc.
Bybee, R., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., van Scotter, P., Carlson, J., Westbrook, A., et al. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Colorado Springs CO: BSCS.
Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International Journal of Testing, 1(1), 55–86.
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: a control-process view. Psychological Review, 97(1), 19–35.
Chen, Y. (2019). Effect of mobile augmented reality on learning performance motivation and math anxiety in a math course. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(7), 1695–1722.
 Chin, W. "The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling," in Modern Methods for Business Research, G. A. Marcoulides (ed.) Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 1998.
Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., Wylie, C. (2012). A Self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In J. Reeve (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 149–172). US: Springer.
Critcher, C. R., & Ferguson, M. J. (2011). Affect in the abstract: abstract mindsets promote sensitivity to affect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(6), 1185–1191.
Cureton, E. E. (1957). The upper and lower twenty-seven per cent rule. Psychometrika, 22, 293–296.
Edelson, D., & Gordin, D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3–4), 391–450.
Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. (2012). Student engagement: What is it and why does it matter? In S. Christenson, A. L. Reschy, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 97–131). New York: Springer.
Floyd, E. M., William, E. S., Charles, R. C., Shigekazu, T., Atsushi, Y. (1992). A study of the logical thinking skills and integrated process skills of junior high school students in North Carolina and Japan. Science Education, 76(2), 211–222.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
Fredricks, J. A., & Paris, B. A. H. (2004). School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
Fredricks, J. A., Wang, M. T., Schall Linn, J., Hofkens, T. L., Sung, H., Parr, A., et al. (2016). Using qualitative methods to develop a survey measure of math and science engagement. Learning & Instruction, 43, 5–15.
Gallagher, B., & Cartwright-Hatton, S. (2008). The relationship between parenting factors and trait anxiety: Mediating role of cognitive errors and metacognition. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 22(4), 722–733.
Gardner, C. M. (2011). Supporting cognitive engagement in a learning-by-doing learning environment: Case studies of participant engagement and social configurations in Kitchen Science Investigators. Georgia Institute of Technology.
Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. Cambridge: Taylor & Francis.
GarrisonAkyol, , D. R. (2015). Toward the development of a metacognition construct for communities of inquiry. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 66–71.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. Internet & Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23.
Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: a construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569–582.
Gilliam, M., Jagoda, P., Fabiyi, C., Lyman, P., Wilson, C., Hill, B., et al. (2017). Alternate reality games as an informal learning tool for generating STEM engagement among underrepresented youth: a qualitative evaluation of the source. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(3), 295–308. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10956-016-9679-4CrossRef
Green, S. B., & Salkind, N. (2004). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433.
Himmerlfarb, S. (1993). The measurement of attitudes. In A. H. Eagly, & S. Chaiken (Eds.), The Psychology of Attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.
Holstermann, N., Grube, D., Boegeholz, S. (2009). The influence of emotion on students’ performance in dissection exercises. Journal of Biological Education, 43(4), 164–168.
Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Liu, M. C., Ho, H. Y., Chen, Y. L. (2014). Using a “prediction-observation- explanation” inquiry model to enhance student interest and intention to continue science learning predicted by their internet cognitive failure. Computers & Education, 72, 110–120.
Hong, J.-C., Hwang, M.-Y., Tai, K.-H., Tsai, C.-R. (2017). An Exploration of students’ science learning interest related to their cognitive anxiety, cognitive load, self-confidence and learning progress using inquiry-based learning with an iPad. Research in Science Education, 47(6), 1193–1212.
Hordacre, B., Immink, M. A., Ridding, M. C., Hillier, S. (2016). Perceptual-motor learning benefits from increased stress and anxiety. Human Movement Science, 49, 36–46.
Hwang, M. Y., Hong, J. C., Tai, K. H., Chen, J. T., Gouldthorp, T. (2020). The relationship between the online social anxiety, perceived information overload and fatigue, and job engagement of civil servant LINE users. Government Information Quarterly, 37(1), 1–8.
Ingram, R. E., & Kendall, P. C. (1987). The cognitive side of anxiety. Cognitive Therapy & Research, 11(5), 523–536.
Irak, M., & Tosun, A. (2008). Exploring the role of metacognition in obsessive–compulsive and anxiety symptoms. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 22(8), 1316–1325.
Johnson, M. L., & Sinatra, G. M. (2013). Use of task-value instructional inductions for facilitating engagement and conceptual change. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(1), 51–63.
Jrvel, S., Veermans, M., Leinonen, P. (2008). Investigating student engagement in computer-supported inquiry: a process-oriented analysis. Social Psychology of Education, 11(3), 299–322.
Kairong, W., Tao, X., Qiong, L. (1999). A Study on the Relationship between self-efficacy attribution and Academic Performance of Middle school Students [in Chinese]. Psychological Development and Education, 4, 22–25.
Khng, K. H. (2016). A better state-of-mind: deep breathing reduces state anxiety and enhances test performance through regulating test cognitions in children. Cognition and Emotion, 31(7), 1502–1510.
Lam, C. C., Wong, N. Y., Wong, K. M. P. (1999). Students’ conception of mathematics learning: a Hong Kong study. Curriculum and Teaching, 14(2), 27–48.
Lesgold, A. M. (2001). The nature and methods of learning by doing. American Psychologist, 56(11), 964–973.
Li, J., Yang, Z., Qiu, H., Wang, Y., Jian, L., Ji, J., et al. (2020). Anxiety and depression among general population in China at the peak of the COVID-19 epidemic. World Psychiatry, 19(2), 249–250.
Liu, N., Liu, S., Yu, N., Peng, Y., Wen, Y., Tang, J., et al. (2018). Correlations among psychological resilience, self-efficacy, and negative emotion in acute myocardial infarction patients after percutaneous coronary intervention. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9, 1.
Liu, R. D., Zhen, R., Ding, Y., Liu, Y., Wang, J., Jiang, R., et al. (2017). Teacher support and math engagement: roles of academic self-efficacy and positive emotions. Educational Psychology, 38(1), 3–16.
Lynn, S. L. (2000). Map use and the development of spatial cognition: seeing the bigger picture. Developmental Science, 3(3), 270–274.
Lynn, S. L., Kim, A. K., Adam, E. C. (2011). Spatial foundations of science education: the illustrative case of instruction on introductory geological concepts. Cognition and Instruction, 29(1), 45–87.
Martens, R., Burton, D., Vealey, R. S., Bump, L. A., Smith, D. E. (1990). Development and validation of the Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 (CSAI-2). In R. Martens, R. S. Vealey, & D. Burton (Eds.), Competitive anxiety in sport (pp. 117–213). Champaign: Human Kinetics Publishers Inc.
Martin, A. J. (2008). How domain specific is motivation and engagement across school, sport, and music? A substantive-methodological synergy assessing young sportspeople and musicians. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 785–813.
Mcconney, A., Oliver, M. C., Woods-Mcconney, A., Schibeci, R., Maor, D. (2014). Inquiry, engagement, and literacy in science: a retrospective, cross-national analysis using PISA 2006. Science Education, 98(6), 963–980.
Mooij, T. (Ed.). (2005, September). Towards a ‘contextual learning theory’ to optimise instruction and learning, Dublin, Ireland: European Conference on Educational Research.
Mooij, T. (2007). Contextual learning theory: concrete form and a software prototype to improve early education. Computers & Education, 48(1), 100–118.
Moreno, R. (2006). Does the modality principle hold for different media? A test of the method-affects-learning hypothesis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(3), 149–158.
Moreno, R. (2009). Learning from animated classroom exemplars: the case for guiding student teachers’ observations with metacognitive prompts. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 15, 487–501.
Morony, S., Kleitman, S., Lee, Y. P., Stankov, L. (2013). Predicting achievement: confidence vs. self-efficacy, anxiety, and self-concept in Confucian and European countries. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 79–96.
Morris, L. W., Davis, M. A., Hutchings, C. H. (1981). Cognitive and emotional components of anxiety: literature review and a revised worry–emotionality scale. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 541–555.
Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representation: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: NY, Basic Books.
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., et al. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61.
Pegg, J. M. (2006). Developing explanations: student reasoning about science concepts during claims-evidence inquiry lessons. Ph.D. diss. Corvallis, OR: Department of Science and Math Education, Oregon State University.
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: a program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91–105.
Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667–686.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.
Ramirez, G., Chang, H., Maloney, E. A., Levine, S. C., Beilock, S. L. (2016). On the relationship between math anxiety and math achievement in early elementary school: The role of problem solving strategies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141, 83–100.
Remesal, A., & Friesen, N. (2014). Inquiry into ‘communities of inquiry’: Knowledge, communication, presence, community. E-Learning and Digital Media, 11(1), 1–4.
Rimm-kaufman, S. E., Baroody, A. E., Larsen, R. A. A., Curby, T. W., Abry, T. (2014). To what extent do teacher-student inter-action quality and student gender contribute to fifth graders’ engagement in mathematics learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 170–185.
Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Straub, D. W. (2012). A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS quarterly. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 3–14.
Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R. (2007). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 14(2), 50–71.
Samantha Kelly, B., Rebecca, D., Richard, A., Gideon James, R., Neil, G. (2018). A systematic, thematic review of social and occupational factors associated with psychological outcomes in healthcare employees during an infectious disease outbreak. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 60(3), 248–257.
Satpute, A. B., Shu, J., Weber, J., Roy, M., Ochsner, K. N. (2013). The functional neural architecture of self-reports of affective experience. Biological Psychiatry, 73(7), 631–638.
Scanlon, C. L., Toro, J. D., Wang, M. T. (2020). Socially anxious science achievers: The roles of peer social support and social engagement in the relation between adolescents’ social anxiety and science achievement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(5), 1005–1016.
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-romá, V., Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92.
Selcan, K., & Zahide, Y. (2018). Investigation of community of inquiry framework in regard to self-regulation, metacognition and motivation. Computers & Education, 126, 53–64.
Selcuk, O., & Sukriye, B. O. (2020, May). Levels and predictors of anxiety, depression and health anxiety during COVID-19 pandemic in Turkish society: The importance of gender. International Journal of Social Psychiatry. Retrieved from https://​journals.​sagepub.​com/​doi/​pdf/​https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​0020764020927051​
Seyle, H. (1950). The physiology and pathology of exposure to stress. Montreal, Canada: Acta.
Seyle, H. (1952). Story of the adaptation syndrome. Montreal, Canada: Acta.
Seyle, H. (1956). Stress of life. New York: McGrawwhill Co.
Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2009). Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education. Computers & Education, 52(3), 543–553.
Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1721–1731.
Shu-Yun Sophie, C. (2013). An empirical investigation of the effectiveness of project-based course learning within hospitality programs: the mediating role of cognitive engagement. Journal of Hospitality Leisure Sport & Tourism Education, 13, 213–225.
Singh, A., Bhadauria, V., Jain, A., Gurung, A. (2013). Role of gender, self-efficacy, anxiety and testing formats in learning spreadsheets. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 739–746.
Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493–525.
Soltanlou, M., Artemenko, C., Dresler, T., Fallgatter, A. J., Ehlis, A. C., Nuerk, H. C. (2019). Math anxiety in combination with low visuospatial memory impairs math learning in children. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 89.
Spielberger, C. (1972). Anxiety as an emotional state. In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.), Anxiety: current trends in theory and research (Vol. 1, pp. 23–49). New York: Academic.
Tanaka, A., Takehara, T., Yamauchi, H. (2006). Achievement goals in a presentation task: performance expectancy, achievement goals, state anxiety, and task performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 16(2), 93–99.
Taylor, L. M., Casto, D. J., Walls, R. T. (2004). Tools, time, and strategies for integrating technology across the curriculum. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 17(2), 121–136.
Valentiner, D. P., Telch, M. J., Petruzzi, D. C., Bolte, M. C. (1996). Cognitive mechanisms in claustrophobia: an examination of Reiss and McNally’s expectancy model and Bandura’s self-efficacy theory. Cognitive Therapy & Research, 20(6), 593–612.
Wang, M. T., Fredricks, J. A., Ye, F., Hofkens, T. L., Linn, J. S. (2016). The math and science engagement scales: scale development, validation, and psychometric properties. Learning & Instruction, 43, 16–26.
Weinberg, R. S., & Gould, D. (2003). Foundations of sport and exercise psychology (3rd ed.). Champaign: Human Kinetics Publishers Inc.
White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3–118.
Yang, X. T., Zhang, M. M., Song, X., Hou, L., Wang, Q. (2019). Regional educational equity: A survey on the ability to design scientific experiments of sixth-grade students. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(6), 971–985.
Yeh, Y. C., Yen, C. F., Lai, C. S., Huang, C. H., Liu, K. M., Huang, I. T. (2007). Correlations between academic achievement and anxiety and depression in medical students experiencing integrated curriculum reform. Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, 23(8), 379–386.
Yin, Z. Z., Sun, M. Y., Liang, T. F. (2016). The influence of stress life events on college students’ study engagement: the moderate effect of mental resilience. China Journal of Health Psychology, 24(4), 618–621.
Liang, Y.S. (2000). Study on achievement goals, attribution styles and academic self-efficacy of college students. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Central China Normal University, Wuhan.
Zhen, R., Liu, R.-D., Ding, Y., Wang, J., Liu, Y., Xu, L. (2017). The mediating roles of academic self-efficacy and academic emotions in the relation between basic psychological needs satisfaction and learning engagement among Chinese adolescent students. Learning and Individual Differences, 54, 210–216.
Zhen, R., Liu, R.-D., Ding, Y., Liu, Y., Wang, J., Xu, L. (2016). The moderating role of intrinsic value in the relation between psychological needs support and academic engagement in mathematics among Chinese adolescent students. International Journal of Psychology, 53(4), 313–320.
Zhou, H., & Long, L. (2004). Statistical remedies for common method biases [in Chinese]. Advances in Psychological Science, 12, 942–950.
Zhu, E. (2006). Interaction and cognitive engagement: an analysis of four asynchronous online discussions. Instructional Science, 34(6), 451–480.
Metadata
Title
The Effects of Scientific Self-efficacy and Cognitive Anxiety on Science Engagement with the “Question-Observation-Doing-Explanation” Model during School Disruption in COVID-19 Pandemic
Authors
Xiantong Yang
Mengmeng Zhang
Lingqiang Kong
Qiang Wang
Jon-Chao Hong
Publication date
04-11-2020
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Science Education and Technology / Issue 3/2021
Print ISSN: 1059-0145
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1839
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09877-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2021

Journal of Science Education and Technology 3/2021 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Investigating Engagement and Flow with a Placed-Based Immersive Virtual Reality Game

OriginalPaper

STEM Teachers’ Preparation, Teaching Beliefs, and Perceived Teaching Competence: a Multigroup Structural Equation Approach

ReviewPaper

A Meta-Analysis of Machine Learning-Based Science Assessments: Factors Impacting Machine-Human Score Agreements

OriginalPaper

The Development and Validation of a Survey for Evaluating Primary Students’ Self-efficacy in STEM Activities

OriginalPaper

Biology Undergraduate Students’ Graphing Practice in Digital Versus Pen and Paper Graphing Environments

Correction

Correction to: Biology Undergraduate Students’ Graphing Practice in Digital Versus Pen and Paper Graphing Environments

Premium Partners

    Image Credits