Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Business Ethics 1/2019

28-03-2017 | Original Paper

The Ethics of Functional Differentiation: Reclaiming Morality in Niklas Luhmann’s Social Systems Theory

Author: Vladislav Valentinov

Published in: Journal of Business Ethics | Issue 1/2019

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Niklas Luhmann held a skeptical view of the role of morality in the modern society. The present paper reassesses this skepticism in view of his early work showing the regime of functional differentiation to be supported by fundamental human rights. Building on this argument, the paper advocates a more positive view of morality which is shown to be related to the sustainability of social systems in their encompassing societal and natural environment. This view is warranted by the overarching Luhmannian theme of the precariousness of system–environment relations. If this view is accepted, Luhmann’s work on fundamental human rights can be read as an illustration of moral problems caused by the overexpansion tendencies of the political system. This argument is shown to connect up with the ideas of Buchanan and Rawls, as well as to fit in with the Luhmannian construct of the dilemma of structure and function.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Agafonow, A. (2015). Value creation, value capture, and value devolution: Where do social enterprises stand? Administration & Society, 47(8), 1038–1060.CrossRef Agafonow, A. (2015). Value creation, value capture, and value devolution: Where do social enterprises stand? Administration & Society, 47(8), 1038–1060.CrossRef
go back to reference Brans, M., & Rossbach, S. (1997). The autopoiesis of administrative systems: Niklas Luhmann on public administration and public policy. Public Administration, 75, 417–439.CrossRef Brans, M., & Rossbach, S. (1997). The autopoiesis of administrative systems: Niklas Luhmann on public administration and public policy. Public Administration, 75, 417–439.CrossRef
go back to reference Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. M. (2000). The reason of rules: Constitutional political economy. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. M. (2000). The reason of rules: Constitutional political economy. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
go back to reference Buchanan, J. M. (2000). The limits of liberty: Between anarchy and leviathan. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. Buchanan, J. M. (2000). The limits of liberty: Between anarchy and leviathan. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
go back to reference Duska, R. (2007). Contemporary reflections on business ethics. Dordrecht: Springer. Duska, R. (2007). Contemporary reflections on business ethics. Dordrecht: Springer.
go back to reference Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times, September, 13:33. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times, September, 13:33.
go back to reference Gensicke, D. (2008). Luhmann. Stuttgart: Reclam. Gensicke, D. (2008). Luhmann. Stuttgart: Reclam.
go back to reference Gentile, G. C., Wetzel, R., & Wolf, P. (2015). The non-sense of organizational morality: Processing corporate social responsibility between formal and informal organizational structures. Journal of Global Responsibility, 6(1), 19–44.CrossRef Gentile, G. C., Wetzel, R., & Wolf, P. (2015). The non-sense of organizational morality: Processing corporate social responsibility between formal and informal organizational structures. Journal of Global Responsibility, 6(1), 19–44.CrossRef
go back to reference Graber, C. B., & Teubner, G. (1998). Art and money: Constitutional rights in the private sphere? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 18(1), 61–73.CrossRef Graber, C. B., & Teubner, G. (1998). Art and money: Constitutional rights in the private sphere? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 18(1), 61–73.CrossRef
go back to reference Habermas, J. (1985). The theory of communicative action. Volume 2: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Boston: Beacon Press. Habermas, J. (1985). The theory of communicative action. Volume 2: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Boston: Beacon Press.
go back to reference Hielscher, S., Pies, I., Valentinov, V., & Chatalova, L. (2016). Rationalizing the GMO debate: The ordonomic approach to addressing agricultural myths. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. doi:10.3390/ijerph13050476. Hielscher, S., Pies, I., Valentinov, V., & Chatalova, L. (2016). Rationalizing the GMO debate: The ordonomic approach to addressing agricultural myths. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. doi:10.​3390/​ijerph13050476.
go back to reference Horster, D. (2012). Ethik. In O. Jahraus, A. Nassehi, M. Grizelj, I. Saake, C. Kirchmeier, & J. Müller (Eds.), Luhmann Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Wirkung (pp. 336–340). Stuttgart et al: Verlag J.B.Metzler. Horster, D. (2012). Ethik. In O. Jahraus, A. Nassehi, M. Grizelj, I. Saake, C. Kirchmeier, & J. Müller (Eds.), Luhmann Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Wirkung (pp. 336–340). Stuttgart et al: Verlag J.B.Metzler.
go back to reference Kirchmeier, C. (2012). Moral. In O. Jahraus, A. Nassehi, M. Grizelj, I. Saake, C. Kirchmeier, & J. Müller (Eds.), Luhmann Handbuch: Leben—Werk—Wirkung (pp. 105–107). Stuttgart: J.B.Metzler. Kirchmeier, C. (2012). Moral. In O. Jahraus, A. Nassehi, M. Grizelj, I. Saake, C. Kirchmeier, & J. Müller (Eds.), Luhmann Handbuch: Leben—Werk—Wirkung (pp. 105–107). Stuttgart: J.B.Metzler.
go back to reference Kneer, G., & Nassehi, A. (2000). Niklas Luhmanns Theorie sozialer Systeme. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink. Kneer, G., & Nassehi, A. (2000). Niklas Luhmanns Theorie sozialer Systeme. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink.
go back to reference Luhmann, N. (1965). Grundrechte als Institution: ein Beitrag zur politischen Soziologie. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Luhmann, N. (1965). Grundrechte als Institution: ein Beitrag zur politischen Soziologie. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
go back to reference Luhmann, N. (1981). Politische Theorie im Wohlfahrtsstaat. München et al.: Günter Olzog Verlag. Luhmann, N. (1981). Politische Theorie im Wohlfahrtsstaat. München et al.: Günter Olzog Verlag.
go back to reference Luhmann, N. (1989). Ecological communication. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Luhmann, N. (1989). Ecological communication. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
go back to reference Luhmann, N. (1990). Essays on self-reference. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. Luhmann, N. (1990). Essays on self-reference. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
go back to reference Luhmann, N. (1991). Paradigm Lost: On the ethical reflection of morality. Thesis Eleven, 29, 82–94.CrossRef Luhmann, N. (1991). Paradigm Lost: On the ethical reflection of morality. Thesis Eleven, 29, 82–94.CrossRef
go back to reference Luhmann, N. (1993a). Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik (Vol. 3). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Luhmann, N. (1993a). Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik (Vol. 3). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
go back to reference Luhmann, N. (1993b). The code of the moral. Cardozo Law Review, 14, 995–1009. Luhmann, N. (1993b). The code of the moral. Cardozo Law Review, 14, 995–1009.
go back to reference Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
go back to reference Luhmann, N. (1999 [1968]). Zweckbegriff und Systemrationalität. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Luhmann, N. (1999 [1968]). Zweckbegriff und Systemrationalität. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
go back to reference Luhmann, N. (2002). Theories of distinction: Redescribing the descriptions of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Luhmann, N. (2002). Theories of distinction: Redescribing the descriptions of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
go back to reference Luhmann, N. (2012). The Theory of Society (Vol. 1). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Luhmann, N. (2012). The Theory of Society (Vol. 1). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
go back to reference Luhmann, N. (2013). Introduction to systems theory. Cambridge: Polity Press. Luhmann, N. (2013). Introduction to systems theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
go back to reference Neckel, S., & Wolf, J. (1994). The fascination of amorality: Luhmann’s theory of morality and its resonances among German intellectuals. Theory, Culture & Society, 11(2), 69–99.CrossRef Neckel, S., & Wolf, J. (1994). The fascination of amorality: Luhmann’s theory of morality and its resonances among German intellectuals. Theory, Culture & Society, 11(2), 69–99.CrossRef
go back to reference Pies, I. (2009). Moral als Heuristik. Berlin: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Berlin. Pies, I. (2009). Moral als Heuristik. Berlin: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Berlin.
go back to reference Pies, I., Beckmann, M., & Hielscher, S. (2014). The political role of the business firm: an ordonomic reconceptualization of an Aristotelian idea. Business and Society, 53(2), 226–259.CrossRef Pies, I., Beckmann, M., & Hielscher, S. (2014). The political role of the business firm: an ordonomic reconceptualization of an Aristotelian idea. Business and Society, 53(2), 226–259.CrossRef
go back to reference Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
go back to reference Reese-Schäfer, W. (1999). Niklas Luhmann zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius. Reese-Schäfer, W. (1999). Niklas Luhmann zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius.
go back to reference Röhl, K. F. (1987). Rechtssoziologie: ein Lehrbuch. Köln: Heymann. Röhl, K. F. (1987). Rechtssoziologie: ein Lehrbuch. Köln: Heymann.
go back to reference Roth, S. (2013). Common values? Fifty-two cases of value semantics copying on corporate websites. Human Systems Management, 32, 249–265. Roth, S. (2013). Common values? Fifty-two cases of value semantics copying on corporate websites. Human Systems Management, 32, 249–265.
go back to reference Roth, S. (2014). The things that go without saying: on performative differences between business value communication and communication on business values. International Journal of Business Performance Management, 15, 175–189.CrossRef Roth, S. (2014). The things that go without saying: on performative differences between business value communication and communication on business values. International Journal of Business Performance Management, 15, 175–189.CrossRef
go back to reference Roth, S. (2015). Free economy! On 3628800 alternatives of and to capitalism. Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 27, 107–128.CrossRef Roth, S. (2015). Free economy! On 3628800 alternatives of and to capitalism. Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 27, 107–128.CrossRef
go back to reference Schimank, U. (2009). Die Moderne: eine funktional differenzierte kapitalistische Gesellschaft. Berliner Journal für Soziologie, 3, 327–351.CrossRef Schimank, U. (2009). Die Moderne: eine funktional differenzierte kapitalistische Gesellschaft. Berliner Journal für Soziologie, 3, 327–351.CrossRef
go back to reference Schneider, L. W. (2009). Grundlagen der soziologischen Theorie. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRef Schneider, L. W. (2009). Grundlagen der soziologischen Theorie. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRef
go back to reference Thompson, S., & Valentinov, V. (2017). The neglect of society in the theory of the firm: A systems theory perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics. doi:10.1093/cje/bew072. Thompson, S., & Valentinov, V. (2017). The neglect of society in the theory of the firm: A systems theory perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics. doi:10.​1093/​cje/​bew072.
go back to reference Tool, R. (2001). The discretionary economy: A normative theory of political economy. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers. Tool, R. (2001). The discretionary economy: A normative theory of political economy. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
go back to reference Valentinov, V. (2014a). The complexity-sustainability trade-off in Niklas Luhmann’s social systems theory. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 31(1), 14–22.CrossRef Valentinov, V. (2014a). The complexity-sustainability trade-off in Niklas Luhmann’s social systems theory. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 31(1), 14–22.CrossRef
go back to reference Valentinov, V. (2014b). K. William Kapp’s theory of social costs: A Luhmannian interpretation. Ecological Economics, 97(1), 28–33. Valentinov, V. (2014b). K. William Kapp’s theory of social costs: A Luhmannian interpretation. Ecological Economics, 97(1), 28–33.
go back to reference Valentinov, V. (2015b). From equilibrium to autopoiesis: A Luhmannian reading of Veblenian evolutionary economics. Economic Systems, 39(1), 143–155. Valentinov, V. (2015b). From equilibrium to autopoiesis: A Luhmannian reading of Veblenian evolutionary economics. Economic Systems, 39(1), 143–155.
go back to reference Valentinov, V. (2015c). Kenneth Boulding’s theories of evolutionary economics and organizational change: A reconstruction. Journal of Economic Issues, 49(1), 71–88. Valentinov, V. (2015c). Kenneth Boulding’s theories of evolutionary economics and organizational change: A reconstruction. Journal of Economic Issues, 49(1), 71–88.
go back to reference Valentinov, V. (2015d). Demand, supply, and sustainability: Reflections on Kenneth Boulding’s evolutionary economics. Society and Natural Resources, 28(11), 1216–1232. Valentinov, V. (2015d). Demand, supply, and sustainability: Reflections on Kenneth Boulding’s evolutionary economics. Society and Natural Resources, 28(11), 1216–1232.
go back to reference Valentinov, V., & Chatalova, L. (2016). Institutional economics and social dilemmas: A systems theory perspective. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 33(1), 138–149. Valentinov, V., & Chatalova, L. (2016). Institutional economics and social dilemmas: A systems theory perspective. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 33(1), 138–149.
go back to reference Valentinov, V., Hielscher, S., & Pies, I. (2016). Emergence: A systems theory’s challenge to ethics. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 29(6), 597–610. Valentinov, V., Hielscher, S., & Pies, I. (2016). Emergence: A systems theory’s challenge to ethics. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 29(6), 597–610.
go back to reference Van Assche, K., & Verschraegen, G. (2008). The limits of planning: Niklas Luhmann’s systems theory and the analysis of planning and planning ambitions. Planning Theory, 7(3), 263–283.CrossRef Van Assche, K., & Verschraegen, G. (2008). The limits of planning: Niklas Luhmann’s systems theory and the analysis of planning and planning ambitions. Planning Theory, 7(3), 263–283.CrossRef
go back to reference Verschraegen, G. (2002). Human rights and modern society: A sociological analysis from the perspective of systems theory. Journal of Law and Society, 29(2), 258–281.CrossRef Verschraegen, G. (2002). Human rights and modern society: A sociological analysis from the perspective of systems theory. Journal of Law and Society, 29(2), 258–281.CrossRef
go back to reference Verschraegen, G. (2011). Hybrid constitutionalism, fundamental rights and the state. Rechtsfilosofie & Rechtstheorie, 40(3), 216–229. Verschraegen, G. (2011). Hybrid constitutionalism, fundamental rights and the state. Rechtsfilosofie & Rechtstheorie, 40(3), 216–229.
go back to reference von Groddeck, V. (2011a). Rethinking the role of value communication in business corporations from a sociological perspective: Why organisations need value-based semantics to cope with societal and organisational fuzziness. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 69–84.CrossRef von Groddeck, V. (2011a). Rethinking the role of value communication in business corporations from a sociological perspective: Why organisations need value-based semantics to cope with societal and organisational fuzziness. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 69–84.CrossRef
go back to reference von Groddeck, V. (2011b). The function of dysfunctions: The paradox of value-based leadership communication. European Journal of International Management, 5(1), 30–46. von Groddeck, V. (2011b). The function of dysfunctions: The paradox of value-based leadership communication. European Journal of International Management, 5(1), 30–46.
go back to reference Wallis, S. E. (2009). The complexity of complexity theory: An innovative analysis. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 11(4), 26–38. Wallis, S. E. (2009). The complexity of complexity theory: An innovative analysis. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 11(4), 26–38.
go back to reference Wallis, S. E., & Valentinov, V. (2016a). A limit to our thinking and some unanticipated moral consequences: A science of conceptual systems perspective with some potential solutions. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 30(2), 103–116. Wallis, S. E., & Valentinov, V. (2016a). A limit to our thinking and some unanticipated moral consequences: A science of conceptual systems perspective with some potential solutions. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 30(2), 103–116.
go back to reference Wallis, S., & Valentinov, V. (2016b). The imperviance of conceptual systems: Cognitive and moral aspects. Kybernetes, 45(9), 1437–1451. Wallis, S., & Valentinov, V. (2016b). The imperviance of conceptual systems: Cognitive and moral aspects. Kybernetes, 45(9), 1437–1451.
go back to reference Wallis, S., & Valentinov, V. (2016c). What is sustainable theory? A Luhmannian perspective on the science of conceptual systems. Foundations of Science. doi:10.1007/s10699-016-9496-5. Wallis, S., & Valentinov, V. (2016c). What is sustainable theory? A Luhmannian perspective on the science of conceptual systems. Foundations of Science. doi:10.​1007/​s10699-016-9496-5.
Metadata
Title
The Ethics of Functional Differentiation: Reclaiming Morality in Niklas Luhmann’s Social Systems Theory
Author
Vladislav Valentinov
Publication date
28-03-2017
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3521-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Journal of Business Ethics 1/2019 Go to the issue

Acknowledgment

Reviewers 2018