Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Business Ethics 4/2021

08-07-2019 | Original Paper

The Glass Pyramid: Informal Gender Status Hierarchy on Boards

Authors: Lívia Markóczy, Sunny Li Sun, Jigao Zhu

Published in: Journal of Business Ethics | Issue 4/2021

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Drawing on the status characteristic theory, we investigate the effect of gender on board directors’ status ranking and find that all else being equal, female directors’ status ranking is 81.48% of one position lower than that of male directors, a discrepancy that is attributable to gender. We theorize on the mechanism that determines the ways in which the status value of gender on a board affects board interactions, and we predict how this mechanism influences firm outcomes, including excessive managerial spending, social responsibility performance, and firm risk. We test our hypotheses in Chinese firms using an unbalanced panel that includes 5396 firm-year observations (86,019 director-year observations) for a period of 6 years and find them supported.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
For an exception, see Hillman et al. (2002), but even this study fails to look at the direct effect of gender-based status ranking by boards on firm outcomes, as we attempt to do in this paper.
 
2
The results of these tests are available upon request.
 
Literature
go back to reference Adams, R. B. (2016). Women on boards: The superheroes of tomorrow? Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 371–386. Adams, R. B. (2016). Women on boards: The superheroes of tomorrow? Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 371–386.
go back to reference Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309. Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309.
go back to reference Adams, R. B., & Funk, P. (2012). Beyond the glass ceiling: Does gender matter? Management Science, 58, 219–235. Adams, R. B., & Funk, P. (2012). Beyond the glass ceiling: Does gender matter? Management Science, 58, 219–235.
go back to reference Adams, R. B., Haan, J., Terjesen, S., & Ees, H. (2015). Board diversity: Moving the field forward. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(2), 77–82. Adams, R. B., Haan, J., Terjesen, S., & Ees, H. (2015). Board diversity: Moving the field forward. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(2), 77–82.
go back to reference Ahern, K., & Dittmar, A. (2012). The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127, 137–197. Ahern, K., & Dittmar, A. (2012). The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127, 137–197.
go back to reference Bajtelsmit, W. L., & Bernasek, A. (1996). Why do women invest differently than men? Financial Counseling and Planning, 7, 1–10. Bajtelsmit, W. L., & Bernasek, A. (1996). Why do women invest differently than men? Financial Counseling and Planning, 7, 1–10.
go back to reference Bart, C., & McQueen, G. (2013). Why women make better directors? International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 8(1), 93–99. Bart, C., & McQueen, G. (2013). Why women make better directors? International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 8(1), 93–99.
go back to reference Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 207–221. Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 207–221.
go back to reference Ben-Nasr, H., & Ghouma, H. (2018). Employee welfare and stock price crash risk. Journal of Corporate Finance, 4, 700–725. Ben-Nasr, H., & Ghouma, H. (2018). Employee welfare and stock price crash risk. Journal of Corporate Finance, 4, 700–725.
go back to reference Berger, J., Cohen, B. P., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1972). Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 37, 241–255. Berger, J., Cohen, B. P., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1972). Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 37, 241–255.
go back to reference Berger, J., Fisek, M. H., Norman, R. Z., & Zelditch, M. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction: An expectation-states approach. New York: Elsevier. Berger, J., Fisek, M. H., Norman, R. Z., & Zelditch, M. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction: An expectation-states approach. New York: Elsevier.
go back to reference Bernardi, R. A., & Threadgill, V. H. (2010). Women directors and corporate social responsibility. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 15(2), 15–21. Bernardi, R. A., & Threadgill, V. H. (2010). Women directors and corporate social responsibility. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 15(2), 15–21.
go back to reference Blader, S. L., & Chen, Y. R. (2012). Differentiating the effects of status and power: A justice perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(5), 994–1014. Blader, S. L., & Chen, Y. R. (2012). Differentiating the effects of status and power: A justice perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(5), 994–1014.
go back to reference Boschini, A., Muren, A., & Persson, M. (2012). Constructing gender differences in the economics lab. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 84(3), 741–752. Boschini, A., Muren, A., & Persson, M. (2012). Constructing gender differences in the economics lab. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 84(3), 741–752.
go back to reference Bosworth, W., & Lee, S. (2017). Mandated or spontaneous board diversity? Does it matter? Journal of Business and Behavioral Sciences, 29(1), 45–56. Bosworth, W., & Lee, S. (2017). Mandated or spontaneous board diversity? Does it matter? Journal of Business and Behavioral Sciences, 29(1), 45–56.
go back to reference Bunderson, J. S. (2003). Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristic perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(4), 557–591. Bunderson, J. S. (2003). Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristic perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(4), 557–591.
go back to reference Burke, R., & Mattis, M. (Eds.). (2000). Women on corporate boards of director: International challenges and opportunities (pp. 118–125). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Burke, R., & Mattis, M. (Eds.). (2000). Women on corporate boards of director: International challenges and opportunities (pp. 118–125). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
go back to reference Byrne, K. A., & Worthy, D. A. (2015). Gender differences in reward sensitivity and information processing during decision-making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 50(1), 55–71. Byrne, K. A., & Worthy, D. A. (2015). Gender differences in reward sensitivity and information processing during decision-making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 50(1), 55–71.
go back to reference Byron, K., & Post, C. (2016). Women on boards of directors and corporate social performance: A meta-analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(4), 428–442. Byron, K., & Post, C. (2016). Women on boards of directors and corporate social performance: A meta-analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(4), 428–442.
go back to reference Cai, H., Fang, H., & Xu, L. C. (2011). Eat, drink, firms, government: An investigation of corruption from the entertainment and travel costs of Chinese firms. Journal of Law and Economics, 54(1), 55–78. Cai, H., Fang, H., & Xu, L. C. (2011). Eat, drink, firms, government: An investigation of corruption from the entertainment and travel costs of Chinese firms. Journal of Law and Economics, 54(1), 55–78.
go back to reference Campbell, K., & Minguez, V. A. (2010). Female board appointments and firm valuation: Short and long-term effects. Journal of Management and Governance, 14(1), 37–59. Campbell, K., & Minguez, V. A. (2010). Female board appointments and firm valuation: Short and long-term effects. Journal of Management and Governance, 14(1), 37–59.
go back to reference Carpenter, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2002). Top management team compensation: The missing link between CEO pay and firm performance? Strategic Management Journal, 23(4), 367–375. Carpenter, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2002). Top management team compensation: The missing link between CEO pay and firm performance? Strategic Management Journal, 23(4), 367–375.
go back to reference Carter, D. A., D’Souza, F., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of us boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(5), 396–414. Carter, D. A., D’Souza, F., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of us boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(5), 396–414.
go back to reference Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38, 33–53. Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38, 33–53.
go back to reference Chapple, L., & Humphrey, J. E. (2014). Does board gender diversity have a financial impact? Evidence using stock portfolio performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 122, 709–723. Chapple, L., & Humphrey, J. E. (2014). Does board gender diversity have a financial impact? Evidence using stock portfolio performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 122, 709–723.
go back to reference Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2012). Strong evidence for gender differences in risk taking. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83, 50–58. Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2012). Strong evidence for gender differences in risk taking. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83, 50–58.
go back to reference Christopher, A. N., & Wojda, M. R. (2008). Social dominance orientation, right-wing authoritarianism, sexism, and prejudice toward women in the workforce. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 65–73. Christopher, A. N., & Wojda, M. R. (2008). Social dominance orientation, right-wing authoritarianism, sexism, and prejudice toward women in the workforce. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 65–73.
go back to reference Cohen, B. P., & Zhou, X. (1991). Status processes in enduring work groups. American Sociological Review, 56(2), 179–188. Cohen, B. P., & Zhou, X. (1991). Status processes in enduring work groups. American Sociological Review, 56(2), 179–188.
go back to reference Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (1995). Production equal-status interaction in the heterogeneous classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 99–120. Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (1995). Production equal-status interaction in the heterogeneous classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 99–120.
go back to reference Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448–474. Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448–474.
go back to reference Cumming, D., Leung, T. Y., & Rui, O. M. (2015). Gender diversity and securities fraud. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1572–1593. Cumming, D., Leung, T. Y., & Rui, O. M. (2015). Gender diversity and securities fraud. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1572–1593.
go back to reference Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2003). Women in the boardroom: A business imperative. Journal of Business Strategy, 24(5), 8–10. Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2003). Women in the boardroom: A business imperative. Journal of Business Strategy, 24(5), 8–10.
go back to reference Deutsch, Y. (2005). The impact of board composition on firms’ critical decisions: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 31(3), 424–444. Deutsch, Y. (2005). The impact of board composition on firms’ critical decisions: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 31(3), 424–444.
go back to reference Dezso, C. L., & Ross, D. G. (2012). Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1072–1089. Dezso, C. L., & Ross, D. G. (2012). Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1072–1089.
go back to reference Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
go back to reference Eagly, A. H., Diekman, A. B., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Koenig, A. M. (2004). Gender gaps in sociopolitical attitudes: A social psychological analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(6), 796–816. Eagly, A. H., Diekman, A. B., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Koenig, A. M. (2004). Gender gaps in sociopolitical attitudes: A social psychological analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(6), 796–816.
go back to reference Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–597. Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–597.
go back to reference Faccio, M., Marchia, M.-T., & Murra, R. (2016). CEO gender, corporate risk-taking, and the efficiency of capital allocation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 39, 193–209. Faccio, M., Marchia, M.-T., & Murra, R. (2016). CEO gender, corporate risk-taking, and the efficiency of capital allocation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 39, 193–209.
go back to reference Fairfield, P. M., Sweeney, R. J., & Yohn, T. L. (1996). Accounting classification and the predictive content of earnings. Accounting Review, 71(3), 337–355. Fairfield, P. M., Sweeney, R. J., & Yohn, T. L. (1996). Accounting classification and the predictive content of earnings. Accounting Review, 71(3), 337–355.
go back to reference Fan, G., Wang, X. L., & Zhu, H. P. (2011). The marketization index of china: The process of regional marketization report. Beijing: Economic Science. Fan, G., Wang, X. L., & Zhu, H. P. (2011). The marketization index of china: The process of regional marketization report. Beijing: Economic Science.
go back to reference Farrell, K. A., & Hersch, L. P. (2005). Additions to corporate boards: The effect of gender. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11, 85–106. Farrell, K. A., & Hersch, L. P. (2005). Additions to corporate boards: The effect of gender. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11, 85–106.
go back to reference Ferreira, D. (2015). Board diversity: Should we trust research to inform policy? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(2), 108–111. Ferreira, D. (2015). Board diversity: Should we trust research to inform policy? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(2), 108–111.
go back to reference Ferris, S. P., Jagannathan, M., & Pritchard, A. C. (2003). Too busy to mind the business? Monitoring by directors with multiple board appointments. Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1087–1112. Ferris, S. P., Jagannathan, M., & Pritchard, A. C. (2003). Too busy to mind the business? Monitoring by directors with multiple board appointments. Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1087–1112.
go back to reference Gabaldon, P., Anca, C., Mateos de Cabo, R., & Gimeno, R. (2016). Searching for women on boards: An analysis from the supply and demand perspective. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(3), 371–385. Gabaldon, P., Anca, C., Mateos de Cabo, R., & Gimeno, R. (2016). Searching for women on boards: An analysis from the supply and demand perspective. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(3), 371–385.
go back to reference Gao, Y. W., & Hafsi, T. T. (2015). Government intervention, peers’ giving and corporate philanthropy: Evidence from Chinese private SMEs. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(2), 433–447. Gao, Y. W., & Hafsi, T. T. (2015). Government intervention, peers’ giving and corporate philanthropy: Evidence from Chinese private SMEs. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(2), 433–447.
go back to reference Garg, S., Li, Q., & Shaw, J. D. (2018). Unvervaluation of directors in the board hierarchy: Impact on turnover of directors (and CEOs) in newly public firms. Strategic Management Journal, 39, 429–457. Garg, S., Li, Q., & Shaw, J. D. (2018). Unvervaluation of directors in the board hierarchy: Impact on turnover of directors (and CEOs) in newly public firms. Strategic Management Journal, 39, 429–457.
go back to reference Gregory-Smith, I., Main, B. M., & O’Reilly, C. A. (2014). Appointments, pay and performance in UK boardrooms by gender. Economic Journal, 124(574), F109–F128. Gregory-Smith, I., Main, B. M., & O’Reilly, C. A. (2014). Appointments, pay and performance in UK boardrooms by gender. Economic Journal, 124(574), F109–F128.
go back to reference Haslam, S. A., Ryan, M. K., Kulich, C., Trojanowski, G., & Atkins, C. (2010). Investing with prejudice: The relationship between women’s presence on company boards and objective and subjective measures of company performance. British Journal of Management, 21(2), 484–497. Haslam, S. A., Ryan, M. K., Kulich, C., Trojanowski, G., & Atkins, C. (2010). Investing with prejudice: The relationship between women’s presence on company boards and objective and subjective measures of company performance. British Journal of Management, 21(2), 484–497.
go back to reference Hayes, N. A., & Bendersky, C. (2015). Not all inequality is created equal: Effects of status versus power hierarchies on competition for upward mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(6), 867–882. Hayes, N. A., & Bendersky, C. (2015). Not all inequality is created equal: Effects of status versus power hierarchies on competition for upward mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(6), 867–882.
go back to reference Heckman, J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161. Heckman, J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161.
go back to reference Hillman, A. J. (2015). Board diversity: Beginning to unpeel the onion. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(2), 104–107. Hillman, A. J. (2015). Board diversity: Beginning to unpeel the onion. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(2), 104–107.
go back to reference Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., Jr., & Harris, I. C. (2002). Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: How do directors differ? Journal of Management, 28(6), 747–763. Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., Jr., & Harris, I. C. (2002). Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: How do directors differ? Journal of Management, 28(6), 747–763.
go back to reference Hitt, M. A., Beamish, P. W., Jackson, S. E., & Mathieu, J. E. (2007). Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: Multilevel research in management. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1385–1399. Hitt, M. A., Beamish, P. W., Jackson, S. E., & Mathieu, J. E. (2007). Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: Multilevel research in management. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1385–1399.
go back to reference Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
go back to reference Houser, D., List, J. A., Piovesan, M., Samek, A., & Winter, J. (2016). Dishonesty: From parents to children. European Economic Review, 82, 242–254. Houser, D., List, J. A., Piovesan, M., Samek, A., & Winter, J. (2016). Dishonesty: From parents to children. European Economic Review, 82, 242–254.
go back to reference Iannotta, M., Gatti, M., & Huse, M. (2016). Institutional complementarities and gender diversity on boards: A configurational approach. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(4), 406–427. Iannotta, M., Gatti, M., & Huse, M. (2016). Institutional complementarities and gender diversity on boards: A configurational approach. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(4), 406–427.
go back to reference Ibrahim, N., Angelidis, J., & Tomic, I. M. (2009). Managers’ attitudes toward codes of ethics: Are there gender differences? Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 343–353. Ibrahim, N., Angelidis, J., & Tomic, I. M. (2009). Managers’ attitudes toward codes of ethics: Are there gender differences? Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 343–353.
go back to reference Isidro, H., & Sobral, M. (2015). The effects of women on corporate boards on firm value, financial performance, and ethical and social compliance. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(1), 1–19. Isidro, H., & Sobral, M. (2015). The effects of women on corporate boards on firm value, financial performance, and ethical and social compliance. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(1), 1–19.
go back to reference Jia, M., & Zhang, Z. (2012). Women on boards of directors and corporate philanthropic disaster response. China Journal of Accounting Research, 5, 83–99. Jia, M., & Zhang, Z. (2012). Women on boards of directors and corporate philanthropic disaster response. China Journal of Accounting Research, 5, 83–99.
go back to reference Johnson, J. L., Daily, C. M., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1996). Boards of directors: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 22, 409–438. Johnson, J. L., Daily, C. M., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1996). Boards of directors: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 22, 409–438.
go back to reference Kathlene, L. (1994). Power and influence in state legislative policymaking: The interaction of gender and position in. American Political Science Review, 88(3), 560–576. Kathlene, L. (1994). Power and influence in state legislative policymaking: The interaction of gender and position in. American Political Science Review, 88(3), 560–576.
go back to reference Khaw, K. L., Liao, J., Tripe, D., & Wongchoti, U. (2016). Gender diversity, state control, and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 39, 141–158. Khaw, K. L., Liao, J., Tripe, D., & Wongchoti, U. (2016). Gender diversity, state control, and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 39, 141–158.
go back to reference Konrad, A. M., & Kramer, V. W. (2006). How many women do boards need? Harvard Business Review, 84(2), 22. Konrad, A. M., & Kramer, V. W. (2006). How many women do boards need? Harvard Business Review, 84(2), 22.
go back to reference Konrad, A. M., Kramer, V., & Erkut, S. (2008). Critical mass: The impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organizational Dynamics, 37(2), 145–164. Konrad, A. M., Kramer, V., & Erkut, S. (2008). Critical mass: The impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organizational Dynamics, 37(2), 145–164.
go back to reference Kor, Y. Y., & Misangyi, V. F. (2008). Outside directors’ industry-specific experience and firms’ liability of newness. Strategic Management Journal, 29(12), 1345–1355. Kor, Y. Y., & Misangyi, V. F. (2008). Outside directors’ industry-specific experience and firms’ liability of newness. Strategic Management Journal, 29(12), 1345–1355.
go back to reference Kumar, P., & Zattoni, A. (2016). Corporate governance, board gender diversity and firm performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(4), 388–389. Kumar, P., & Zattoni, A. (2016). Corporate governance, board gender diversity and firm performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(4), 388–389.
go back to reference Leong, T. (2012). In China and Hong Kong women getting on boards. Wall Street Journal, China, 2 Aug. Leong, T. (2012). In China and Hong Kong women getting on boards. Wall Street Journal, China, 2 Aug.
go back to reference Liang, H., Ren, B., & Sun, S. L. (2015). An anatomy of state control in the globalization of state-owned enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(2), 223–240. Liang, H., Ren, B., & Sun, S. L. (2015). An anatomy of state control in the globalization of state-owned enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(2), 223–240.
go back to reference Lucas, J. W. (2003). Status processes and the institutionalization of women as leaders. American Sociological Review, 68(3), 464–480. Lucas, J. W. (2003). Status processes and the institutionalization of women as leaders. American Sociological Review, 68(3), 464–480.
go back to reference Lückerath-Rovers, M. (2013). Women on boards and firm performance. Journal of Management and Governance, 17(2), 491–509. Lückerath-Rovers, M. (2013). Women on boards and firm performance. Journal of Management and Governance, 17(2), 491–509.
go back to reference Manner, M. H. (2010). The impact of CEO characteristics on corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 53–72. Manner, M. H. (2010). The impact of CEO characteristics on corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 53–72.
go back to reference Markoczy, L., Sun, S. L., Peng, M. W., Shi, W., & Ren, B. (2013). Social network contingency, symbolic management, and boundary stretching. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 1367–1387. Markoczy, L., Sun, S. L., Peng, M. W., Shi, W., & Ren, B. (2013). Social network contingency, symbolic management, and boundary stretching. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 1367–1387.
go back to reference Marquis, C., & Qian, C. (2014). Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: Symbol or substance? Organization Science, 25(1), 127–148. Marquis, C., & Qian, C. (2014). Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: Symbol or substance? Organization Science, 25(1), 127–148.
go back to reference Martin, G., Gözübüyük, R., & Becerra, M. (2015). Interlocks and firm performance: The role of uncertainty in the directorate interlock-performance relationship. Strategic Management Journal, 36(2), 235–253. Martin, G., Gözübüyük, R., & Becerra, M. (2015). Interlocks and firm performance: The role of uncertainty in the directorate interlock-performance relationship. Strategic Management Journal, 36(2), 235–253.
go back to reference McNulty, T., Florackis, C., & Ormrod, P. (2013). Boards of directors and financial risk during the credit crisis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(1), 58–78. McNulty, T., Florackis, C., & Ormrod, P. (2013). Boards of directors and financial risk during the credit crisis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(1), 58–78.
go back to reference Miller, K. D., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2011). Testing management theories: Critical realist philosophy and research methods. Strategic Management Journal, 32(2), 139–158. Miller, K. D., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2011). Testing management theories: Critical realist philosophy and research methods. Strategic Management Journal, 32(2), 139–158.
go back to reference Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., Timewell, E., & Alexander, L. (1990). In-depth interviewing: Researching people. Hong Kong: Longman Cheshire Pty Limited. Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., Timewell, E., & Alexander, L. (1990). In-depth interviewing: Researching people. Hong Kong: Longman Cheshire Pty Limited.
go back to reference Mizruchi, M. S. (1996). What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directories. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 271–298. Mizruchi, M. S. (1996). What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directories. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 271–298.
go back to reference Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2010). Women directors’ contribution to board decision-making and strategic involvement: The role of equality perception. European Management Review, 7(1), 16–29. Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2010). Women directors’ contribution to board decision-making and strategic involvement: The role of equality perception. European Management Review, 7(1), 16–29.
go back to reference Overman, W. H. (2004). Sex differences in early childhood, adolescence, and adulthood on cognitive tasks that rely on orbital prefrontal cortex. Brain and Cognition, 55(1), 134–147. Overman, W. H. (2004). Sex differences in early childhood, adolescence, and adulthood on cognitive tasks that rely on orbital prefrontal cortex. Brain and Cognition, 55(1), 134–147.
go back to reference Pelled, L. H. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science, 7, 615–631. Pelled, L. H. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science, 7, 615–631.
go back to reference Peng, M. W., Sun, S. L., & Markoczy, L. (2015). Human capital and CEO compensation during institutional transitions. Journal of Management Studies, 52, 117–147. Peng, M. W., Sun, S. L., & Markoczy, L. (2015). Human capital and CEO compensation during institutional transitions. Journal of Management Studies, 52, 117–147.
go back to reference Post, C., & Byron, K. (2015). Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1546–1571. Post, C., & Byron, K. (2015). Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1546–1571.
go back to reference Pronin, E., Steele, C. M., & Ross, L. (2004). Identity bifurcation in response to stereotype threat: Women and mathematics. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(2), 152–168. Pronin, E., Steele, C. M., & Ross, L. (2004). Identity bifurcation in response to stereotype threat: Women and mathematics. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(2), 152–168.
go back to reference Rabe, H. S., & Skrondal, A. (2008). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press. Rabe, H. S., & Skrondal, A. (2008). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
go back to reference Rao, K., & Tilt, C. (2016). Board composition, and corporate social responsibility: The role of diversity, gender, strategy, and decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 138, 327–347. Rao, K., & Tilt, C. (2016). Board composition, and corporate social responsibility: The role of diversity, gender, strategy, and decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 138, 327–347.
go back to reference Richardson, S. (2006). Over-investment of free cash flow. Review of Accounting Studies, 11(2–3), 159–189. Richardson, S. (2006). Over-investment of free cash flow. Review of Accounting Studies, 11(2–3), 159–189.
go back to reference Ridgeway, C. L. (2001). Gender, status, and leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 637–655. Ridgeway, C. L. (2001). Gender, status, and leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 637–655.
go back to reference Ridgeway, C. L. (2014). Why status matters for inequality. American Sociological Review, 79(1), 1–16. Ridgeway, C. L. (2014). Why status matters for inequality. American Sociological Review, 79(1), 1–16.
go back to reference Ridgeway, C. L., & Kricheli-Katz, T. (2013). Intersecting cultural beliefs in social relations: Gender, race, and class binds and freedoms. Gender & Society, 27(3), 294–318. Ridgeway, C. L., & Kricheli-Katz, T. (2013). Intersecting cultural beliefs in social relations: Gender, race, and class binds and freedoms. Gender & Society, 27(3), 294–318.
go back to reference Roche, J. (2005). Corporate governance in Asia. London, UK: Routledge. Roche, J. (2005). Corporate governance in Asia. London, UK: Routledge.
go back to reference Rose, C. (2007). Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Perspective, 15(2), 404–413. Rose, C. (2007). Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Perspective, 15(2), 404–413.
go back to reference Schein, V. E. (2001). A global look at psychological barriers to women’s progress in management. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 675–688. Schein, V. E. (2001). A global look at psychological barriers to women’s progress in management. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 675–688.
go back to reference Shi, W., Sun, S. L., & Peng, M. W. (2012). Sub-national institutional contingencies, network positions, and IJV partner selection. Journal of Management Studies, 49(7), 1221–1245. Shi, W., Sun, S. L., & Peng, M. W. (2012). Sub-national institutional contingencies, network positions, and IJV partner selection. Journal of Management Studies, 49(7), 1221–1245.
go back to reference Sila, V., Gonzalez, A., & Hagendorff, J. (2016). Women on board: Does boardroom gender diversity affect firm risk? Journal of Corporate Finance, 36, 26–53. Sila, V., Gonzalez, A., & Hagendorff, J. (2016). Women on board: Does boardroom gender diversity affect firm risk? Journal of Corporate Finance, 36, 26–53.
go back to reference Smith, N., Smith, V., & Verner, M. (2006). Do women in top management affect firm performance? A panel study of 2500 Danish firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55, 569–593. Smith, N., Smith, V., & Verner, M. (2006). Do women in top management affect firm performance? A panel study of 2500 Danish firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55, 569–593.
go back to reference Srinidhi, B., Gul, F. A., & Tsui, J. (2011). Female directors and earning quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(5), 1610–1644. Srinidhi, B., Gul, F. A., & Tsui, J. (2011). Female directors and earning quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(5), 1610–1644.
go back to reference Stamarski, C. S., & Hing, L. S. S. (2015). Gender inequalities in the workplace: The effects of organizational structures, processes, practices, and decision makers’ sexism. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–20. Stamarski, C. S., & Hing, L. S. S. (2015). Gender inequalities in the workplace: The effects of organizational structures, processes, practices, and decision makers’ sexism. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–20.
go back to reference Starbuck, W. H. (1976). Organizations and their environments. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally. Starbuck, W. H. (1976). Organizations and their environments. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally.
go back to reference Sun, S. L., Zhu, J., & Ye, K. (2015). Board openness during an economic crisis. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(2), 363–377. Sun, S. L., Zhu, J., & Ye, K. (2015). Board openness during an economic crisis. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(2), 363–377.
go back to reference Tan, J., & Peng, M. (2003). Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: Two studies from an emerging economy. Strategic Management Journal, 24(3), 1249–1263. Tan, J., & Peng, M. (2003). Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: Two studies from an emerging economy. Strategic Management Journal, 24(3), 1249–1263.
go back to reference Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Female directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 320–337. Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Female directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 320–337.
go back to reference Thaler, R. H. (1999). Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 183–220. Thaler, R. H. (1999). Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 183–220.
go back to reference Triana, M. C., Miller, T. L., & Trzebiatowski, T. M. (2014). The double-edged nature of board gender diversity: Diversity, firm performance, and the power of women directors as predictors of strategic change. Organization Science, 25(2), 609–632. Triana, M. C., Miller, T. L., & Trzebiatowski, T. M. (2014). The double-edged nature of board gender diversity: Diversity, firm performance, and the power of women directors as predictors of strategic change. Organization Science, 25(2), 609–632.
go back to reference Tsai, H.-F., & Luan, Ch-J. (2016). What makes firms embrace risks? A risk-taking capability perspective. Business Research Quarterly, 19(3), 213–219. Tsai, H.-F., & Luan, Ch-J. (2016). What makes firms embrace risks? A risk-taking capability perspective. Business Research Quarterly, 19(3), 213–219.
go back to reference Udayasankar, K. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and firm size. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 167–175. Udayasankar, K. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and firm size. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 167–175.
go back to reference Van der Walt, N., Ingley, C., Shergill, G. S., & Townsend, A. (2006). Board configuration: Are diverse boards better boards? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 6(2), 129–147. Van der Walt, N., Ingley, C., Shergill, G. S., & Townsend, A. (2006). Board configuration: Are diverse boards better boards? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 6(2), 129–147.
go back to reference Van Dijk, H., & van Engen, M. L. (2013). A status perspective on the consequences of work group diversity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86(2), 223–241. Van Dijk, H., & van Engen, M. L. (2013). A status perspective on the consequences of work group diversity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86(2), 223–241.
go back to reference Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. W., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1008–1022. Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. W., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1008–1022.
go back to reference Wade, J. B., O’Reilly, C. A., & Pollock, T. G. (2006). Overpaid CEOs and underpaid managers: Fairness and executive compensation. Organization Science, 17(5), 527–544. Wade, J. B., O’Reilly, C. A., & Pollock, T. G. (2006). Overpaid CEOs and underpaid managers: Fairness and executive compensation. Organization Science, 17(5), 527–544.
go back to reference Wagner, D. G., & Berger, J. (1997). Gender and interpersonal task behaviors: Status expectation accounts. Sociological Perspectives, 40(1), 1–32. Wagner, D. G., & Berger, J. (1997). Gender and interpersonal task behaviors: Status expectation accounts. Sociological Perspectives, 40(1), 1–32.
go back to reference Walker, L. S., Doerer, S. C., & Webster, M. (2014a). Status, participation, and influence in task groups. Sociological Perspectives, 57(3), 364–381. Walker, L. S., Doerer, S. C., & Webster, M. (2014a). Status, participation, and influence in task groups. Sociological Perspectives, 57(3), 364–381.
go back to reference Walker, L. S., Doerer, S. C., & Webster, M. (2014b). Status, participation and influence in workgroups. Group Dynamics and Individual Outcomes, 53(3), 364–381. Walker, L. S., Doerer, S. C., & Webster, M. (2014b). Status, participation and influence in workgroups. Group Dynamics and Individual Outcomes, 53(3), 364–381.
go back to reference Washington, M., & Zajac, E. J. (2005). By invitation only: The institutional evolution of status and privilege. Academy of Management Journal, 48(2), 281–296. Washington, M., & Zajac, E. J. (2005). By invitation only: The institutional evolution of status and privilege. Academy of Management Journal, 48(2), 281–296.
go back to reference Westphal, J. D., & Milton, L. P. (2000). How experience and network ties affect the influence of demographic minorities on corporate boards. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2), 366–398. Westphal, J. D., & Milton, L. P. (2000). How experience and network ties affect the influence of demographic minorities on corporate boards. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2), 366–398.
go back to reference Yeh, Y. H., Shu, P. G., Lee, T. S., & Su, Y. H. (2009). Non-tradable share reform and corporate governance in the Chinese stock market. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(4), 457–475. Yeh, Y. H., Shu, P. G., Lee, T. S., & Su, Y. H. (2009). Non-tradable share reform and corporate governance in the Chinese stock market. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(4), 457–475.
go back to reference Zhu, D. H. (2013). Group polarization on corporate boards: Theory and evidence on board decisions about acquisition premiums. Strategic Management Journal, 34(7), 800–822. Zhu, D. H. (2013). Group polarization on corporate boards: Theory and evidence on board decisions about acquisition premiums. Strategic Management Journal, 34(7), 800–822.
go back to reference Zhu, J., Ye, K., Tucker, W. J., & Chan, K. C. (2016). Board hierarchy, independent directors, and firm value: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 41, 262–279. Zhu, J., Ye, K., Tucker, W. J., & Chan, K. C. (2016). Board hierarchy, independent directors, and firm value: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 41, 262–279.
Metadata
Title
The Glass Pyramid: Informal Gender Status Hierarchy on Boards
Authors
Lívia Markóczy
Sunny Li Sun
Jigao Zhu
Publication date
08-07-2019
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04247-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Journal of Business Ethics 4/2021 Go to the issue