nach oben

Asia Pacific Journal of Management

Erschienen in:

10.06.2019

Doing extreme by doing good

verfasst von: Xueyan Dong, Jingyu Gao, Sunny Li Sun, Kangtao Ye

Erschienen in: Asia Pacific Journal of Management | Ausgabe 1/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Firms adopting deviant strategies are generally subject to impaired legitimacy and heightened risk. Based on the legitimacy literature, we hypothesize that strategically deviant firms are motivated to engage in corporate social responsibility activities as protection from a potential legitimacy loss. Using a sample of Chinese-listed firms during the 2003–2011 period, we find that firms with deviant strategies are more likely to engage in charitable donations. In addition, the positive effect of strategic deviance on donations is alleviated when firms communicate effectively with financial analysts, and when block holders largely own these firms.

Vorheriger Artikel Does media coverage help firms “lobby” for government subsidies? Evidence from China

Nächster Artikel A resource-based perspective on leader-member exchange: An updated meta-analysis

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

We searched the dataset of Web of Science (by Clarivate Analytics) and believe that our paper is the first study to identity the causal relationship between strategy deviance and donation.

Here we define “firms with more financial analysist following” as firms that followed by more financial analysist than other firms.

The U.S. data come from Giving USA 2008 (http://givinginstitute.org/giving-usa/); the China data are from the Statistics Bulletin of Civil Affairs Development (2008), published by the Ministry of Civil Affairs, China.

Charities Aid Foundation (2011), World Giving Index 2011 https://www.cafonline.org/publications/2011-publications/world-giving-index-2011.aspx.

http://www.cncf.org.cn/Public/Uploads/user/20150919/1442657103128346.pdf

These results are available upon request.

This result is available upon request.

Abrahamson, E., & Hambrick, D. C. 1997. Attentional homogeneity in industries: The effect of discretion. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18: 513–532.

Adams, M., & Hardwick, P. 1998. An analysis of corporate donations: United Kingdom evidence. Journal of Management Studies, 35: 641–654.

Amato, L. H., & Amato, C. H. 2007. The effects of firm size and industry on corporate giving. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(3): 229–241.

Argenti, P. A. 2004. Collaborating with activists: How Starbucks works with NGOs. California Management Review, 47(1): 91–116.

Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. 2004. Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1): 93–103.

Barton, J. 2005. Who cares about auditor reputation? Contemporary Accounting Research, 22(3): 549–586.

Becker, B., Cronqvist, H., & Fahlenbrach, R. 2011. Estimating the effects of large shareholders using a geographic instrument. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(4): 907–942.

Boutin-Dufresne, F., & Savaria, P. 2004. Corporate social responsibility and financial risk. Journal of Investing, 13: 57–66.

Brammer, S., & Millington, A. 2005. Profit maximization vs. agency: An analysis of charitable giving by UK firms. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 29(4): 517–534.

Brammer, S., & Millington, A. 2006. Firm size, organizational visibility and corporate philanthropy: An empirical analysis. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(1): 6–18.

Brammer, S., & Millington, A. 2008. Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(12): 1325–1343.

Carpenter, M. A. 2000. The price of change: The role of CEO compensation in strategic variation and deviation from industry strategy norms. Journal of Management, 26: 1179–1198.

Chen, J., Ding, R., Hou, W., & Johan, S. 2016. Do financial analysts perform a monitoring role in China? Evidence from modified audit opinions. Abacus, 52(3): 473–500.

Cheng, M., & Subramanyam, K. R. 2008. Analyst following and credit ratings. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(4): 1007–1043.

Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. 2014. Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35: 1–23.

Cheng, M., Lin, B., Lu, R., & Wei, M. 2017. Non-controlling large shareholders in emerging markets: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance. Forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.09.010.

Chiu, S. C., & Sharfman, M. 2011. Legitimacy, visibility, and the antecedents of corporate social performance: an investigation of the instrumental perspective. Journal of Management, 37(6):1558–1585.

Chung, K. H., & Jo, H. 1996. The impact of security analysts' monitoring and marketing functions on the market value of firms. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(4): 493–512.

Chung, K. H., McInish, T. H., Wood, R. A., & Wyhowski, D. J. 1995. Production of information, information asymmetry, and the bid-ask spread: Empirical evidence from analysts' forecasts. Journal of Banking & Finance, 19: 1025–1046.

Cordeiro, J. J., Veliyath, R., & Romal, J. B. 2007. Moderators of the relationship between director stock-based compensation and firm performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15: 1384–1393.

Craninckx, K., & Huyghebaert, N. 2015. Large shareholders and value creation through corporate acquisitions in Europe. The identity of the controlling shareholder matters. European Management Journal, 33(2): 116–131.

D’Aunno, T., Succi, M., & Alexander, J. A. 2000. The role of institutional and market forces in divergent organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(4): 679–703.

Dai, L., Dharwadkar, R., Shi, L., & Zhang, B. 2017. The governance transfer of blockholders: Evidence from block acquisitions and earnings management around the world. Journal of Corporate Finance, 45: 586–607.

Deephouse, D. L. 1996. Does isomorphism legitimate? Academy of Management Journal, 39(4): 1024–1039.

Deephouse, D. L. 1999. To be different, or to be the same? It is a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 147–166.

Denrell, J. 2005. Should we be impressed with high performance? Journal of Management Inquiry, 14: 292–298.

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2): 147–160.

Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20: 65–91.

Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. 2011. Corporate social responsibility and competitive advantage: Overcoming the trust barrier. Management Science, 579: 1528–1545.

Durand, R., Rao, H., & Monin, P. 2007. Code and conduct in French cuisine: Impact of code changes on externalevaluations. Strategic Management Journal, 28(5): 455–472.

Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. 1990. Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 484–503.

Fombrun, C. J., Gardberg, N. A., & Barnett, M. L. 2000. Opportunity platforms and safety nets: corporate citizenship and reputational risk. Business and Society Review, 105(1): 85–106.

Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, USA:Pitman Publishing.

Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. 2004. Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited”. Organization Science, 15(3): 364–369.

Gao, Y. 2009. Corporate social performance in China: Evidence from large companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 89: 23–35.

Gao, Y., Lin, Y. L., & Yang, H. 2017. What’s the value in it? Corporate giving under uncertainty. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 34(1): 215–240.

Gardberg, N. A., & Fombrun, C. 2006. Corporate citizenship: Creating intangible assets across institutional environments. Academy of Management Review, 31(2): 329–346.

Gaur, A. S., Kumar, V., & Singh, D. 2014. Institutions, resources, and internationalization of emerging economy firms. Journal of World Business, 49(1): 12–20.

Geletkanycz, M. A., & Hambrick, D. C. 1997. The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 646–681.

Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. 2009. The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 425–445.

Goranova, M., Priem, R., Ndofor, H., & Trahms, C. 2017. Is there a “dark side” to monitoring? Board and shareholder monitoring effects on M&A performance extremeness. Strategic Management Journal, 38: 2285–2297.

Greening, D. W., & Turban, D. B. 2000. Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attractinga quality workforce. Business & Society, 39: 254–280.

Guan, Y., Wong, M. H., & Zhang, Y. 2015. Analyst following along the supply chain. Review of Accounting Studies, 20: 210–241.

Hiller, N. J., & Hambrick, D. C. 2005. Conceptualizing executive hubris: The role of (hyper-) core self-evaluations in strategic decision-making. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 297–319.

Jain, T., Aguilera, R. V., & Jamali, D. 2017. Corporate stakeholder orientation in an emerging country context: a longitudinal cross industry analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(4):701–719.

Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs,and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305–360.

Jian, M., & Wong, T. J. 2008. Propping and tunneling through related party transactions. Review of Accounting Studies, 15(1): 70–105.

Jo, H., & Kim, Y. 2007. Disclosure frequency and earnings management. Journal of Financial Economics, 84(2): 561–590.

Jo, H., & Kim, Y. 2008. Ethics and disclosure: a study of the financial performance of firms in the seasoned equity offerings market. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(4):855–878.

Jones, T. M. 1995. Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20: 404–437.

Jung, B., Sun, K. J., & Yang, Y. S. 2012. Do financial analysts add value by facilitating more effective monitoring of firms' activities? Journal of Accounting Auditing & Finance, 27(1): 61–99.

Kedia, S., Rajgopal, S., & Zhou, X. 2017. Large shareholders and credit ratings. Journal of Corporate Finance, 124: 632–653.

Khanna, T., Palepu, K., & Sinha, J. 2006. Strategies that fit emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 84(10): 60–69.

Koh, P. S., Qian, C., & Wang, H. 2013. Firm litigation risk and the insurance value of corporate social responsibility. Strategic Management Journal, 35: 1464–1482.

Lambert, R., Leuz, C., & Verrecchia, R. E. 2007. Accounting information, disclosure, and the cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research,45(2): 421-426.

Lang, M., Lins, K., & Miller, D. 2003. ADRs, analysts, and accuracy: Does cross listing in the United States improve a firm's information environment and increase market value? Journal of Accounting Research, 41(2): 317–345.

Lemmon, M. L., & Lins, K. V. 2003. Ownership structure, corporate governance, and firm value: Evidence from the East Asian financial crisis. Journal of Finance, 58: 1445–1468.

Liang, H., Marquis, C., Renneboog, L., & Sun, S. L. 2014. Speaking of corporate social responsibility, Harvard Business School Organizational Behavior Unit Working Paper No. 14–082; European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI) - Finance Working Paper No. 412/2014.

Liang, H., Ren, B., & Sun, S. L. 2015. An anatomy of state control in the globalization of state-owned enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(2): 223–240.

Lin, L. W. 2010. Corporate social responsibility in China: Window dressing or structural change. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 28(1): 64–100.

Luo, X. R., & Wang, D. 2012. Unintended consequences of political endorsement: The effect of government endorsement on private firms’ social responsiveness in a transitional economy. Annual Meeting of the Strategic Management Society.

Mackey, A., Mackey, T. B., & Barney, J. B. 2007. Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32(3): 817–835.

Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. 2015. Behavioral CEOs: The role of managerial overconfidence. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(4): 37–60.

Marquis, C., & Lee, M. 2013. Who is governing whom? Executives, governance, and the structure of generosity in large U.S. firms. Strategic Management Journal, (4, 4): 483–497.

Marquis, C., & Qian, C. 2014. Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: Symbol or substance? Organization Science, 25(1): 127–148.

Martínez-Ferrero, J., Banerjee, S., & García-Sánchez, I. M. A. 2016. Corporate social responsibility as a strategic shield against costs of earnings management practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 133: 305–324.

Maurer, J. G. 1971. Readings in organization theory: Open-system approaches. New York:Random House.

McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. 2000. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification. Strategic Management Journal, 21(5): 603–609.

Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83: 340–363.

Mintzberg, H. 1978. Patterns in strategy formation. Management Science, 24: 934–949.

Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. 1998. Strategy Safari: A Guided Tour through the Wilds of Strategic Management. New York:Free Press.

Mithani, M. A. 2017. Liability of foreignness, natural disasters, and corporate philanthropy. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(8): 941–963.

Muller, A., & Whiteman, G. 2009. Exploring the geography of corporate philanthropic disaster response: A study of fortune global 500 Firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(4): 589–603.

O'Connor, E. 2004. Storytelling to be real: Narrative, legitimacy building and venturing. Economics Papers from University Paris Dauphine.

Orlitzky, M., & Benjamin, J. D. 2001. Corporate social performance and firm risk: a meta-analytic review. Business & Society, 40(4): 369–396.

Park, J. H., Kim, C., Chang, Y. K., Lee, D. H., & Sung, Y. D. 2018. CEO hubris and firm performance: Exploring the moderating roles of CEO power and board vigilance. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(4): 919–933.

Peloza, J. 2006. Using corporate social responsibility as insurance for financial performance. California Management Review, 48(2): 52–72.

Peng, M. W., Sun, S. L., Pinkham, B., & Chen, H. 2009. The institution-based view as a third leg for a strategy tripod. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3): 63–81.

Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. 2003. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Redwood City, CA:Stanford Business Books.

Philippe, D., & Durand, R. 2011. The impact of norm conforming behaviors on firm reputation. Strategic Management Journal, 32: 969–993.

Pollock, T. G., & Rindova, V. P. 2003. Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5): 631–642.

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. 2002. The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12): 56–68.

Porter, M. E. & Kramer, M. R. 2006. Strategy & society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12): 78–92.

Post, J. E., Preston, L., & Sachs, S. 2002. Managing the extended enterprise. California Management Review, 45(1): 6–28.

Prior, D., Surroca, J., & Tribó, J. A. 2008. Are socially responsible managers really ethical? Exploring the relationship between earnings management and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(3): 160–177.

Qian, C., Gao, X., & Tsang, A. 2015. Corporate philanthropy, ownership type, and financial transparency. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(4): 851–867.

Rao, H. 1994. The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimization, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry, 1895–1912. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S1): 29–44.

Saiia, D. H., Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. 2003. Philanthropy as strategy: When corporate charity “begins at home”. Business and Society, 42(2): 169–201.

Seifert, B., Morris, S., & Bartkus, B. 2004. Having, Giving, and Getting: Slack Resources, Corporate Philanthropy, and Firm Financial Performance. Business & Society, 43(2): 135–161.

Serfling, M. A. 2014. CEO age and the riskiness of corporate policies. Journal of Corporate Finance, 25: 251–273.

Sethi, S. P. 1979. A conceptual frame work for environmental analysis of social issues and evaluation of business response patterns. Academy of Management Review, 4(1): 63–74.

Shepherd, D. A., & Zacharakis, A. 2003. A new venture’s cognitive legitimacy: An assessment by customers. Journal of Small Business Management, 41(2): 148–167.

Shi, W., Sun, S. L., Yan, D., & Zhu, Z. 2017. Institutional fragility and outward foreign direct investment from China. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(4): 452–476.

Shocker, A. D., & Sethi, S. P. 1973. An approach to incorporating social preferences in developing corporate action strategies. California Management Review, 15(4): 197–200.

Shores, D. 1990. The association between interim information and security returns surrounding earnings announcements. Journal of Accounting Research, 28(1): 164–181.

Singh, J. V., Tucker, D. J., & Robert, J. H. 1986. Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31: 171–193.

Sirmon, D. G., & Hitt, M. A. 2009. Contingencies within dynamic managerial capabilities: interdependent effects of resource investment and deployment on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(13): 1375–1394.

Stevens, C., Xie, E., & Peng, M. 2016. Toward a legitimacy-based view of political risk: the case of google and yahoo in China. Strategic Management Journal, 37: 945–963.

Su, W., & Tsang, E. W. K. 2015. Product diversification and financial performance: The moderating role of secondary stakeholders. Academy of Management Journal, 58(4): 1128–1148.

Suchman, M. C. 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3): 571–610.

Sun, S. L., & Im, J. 2015. Cutting microfinance interest rates: An opportunity co-creation perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1): 101–128.

Sun, S. L., Yang, X., & Li, W. 2014. Variance-enhancing corporate entrepreneurship under deregulation: An option portfolio approach. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(3): 733–761.

Sun, S. L., Peng, M. W., Lee, R. P., & Tan, W. 2015. Institutional open access in the home country and outward internationalization. Journal of World Business, 50(1): 234–246.

Sun, S. L., Peng, M. W., & Tan, W. 2017. Institutional relatedness behind product diversification and international diversification. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 34(2): 339–366.

Tang, J. Y., Crossan, M., & Rowe, W. G. 2011. Dominant CEO, deviant strategy, and extreme performance: The moderating role of a powerful board. Journal of Management Studies, 48(7): 1479–1503.

Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. 1996. Institutionalization of institutional theory. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.). The Handbook of Organization Studies: Thousand Oaks: 175–190. CA: Sage.

Verrecchia, R. E. 1983. Discretionary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5: 179–194.

Walker, G., Madsen, T. L., & Carini, G. 2002. How does institutional change affect heterogeneity among firms? Strategic Management Journal, 23(2): 89–104.

Wang, H., & Qian, C. 2011. Corporate philanthropy and corporate financial performance: The roles of stakeholder response and political access. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6): 1159–1181.

Wiersema, M. F., & Bowen, H. P. 2009. The use of limited dependent variable techniques in strategy research: Issues and methods. Strategic Management Journal, 30(6): 679–692.

Xia, F., & Walker, G. 2015. How much does owner type matter for firm performance? Manufacturing firms in China 1998–2007. Strategic Management Journal, 36(4): 576–586.

Yafeh, Y., & Yosha, O. 2003. Large shareholders and banks: Who monitors and how? Economic Journal, 113(484): 128–146.

Ye, K., & Zhang, R. 2011. Do lenders value corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 104: 197–206.

Yu, F. 2008. Analyst coverage and earnings management. Journal of Financial Economics, 88: 245–271.

Zhang, R., Rezaee, Z., & Zhu, J. 2010. Corporate philanthropic disaster response and ownership type: Evidence from Chinese firms’ response to the Sichuan earthquake. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(1): 51–63.

Zhang, X., Piesse, J., & Filatotchev, I. 2012. Family control, multiple institutional block-holders, and informed trading. European Journal of Finance, 21(10): 1–22.

Titel: Doing extreme by doing good
verfasst von: Xueyan Dong
Jingyu Gao
Sunny Li Sun
Kangtao Ye
Publikationsdatum: 10.06.2019
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Asia Pacific Journal of Management / Ausgabe 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0217-4561
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9958
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-018-9591-y

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

Attenuating the negative effects of network change on innovation: A whole network level analysis of Taiwanese business groups

Does media coverage help firms “lobby” for government subsidies? Evidence from China

Six paths to Chinese company innovation

Learning through observation or through acquisition? Innovation performance as an outcome of internal and external knowledge combination

The consequence of differences: How heterogeneity in practice adaptations affects the diffusion process

Who controls the Indian economy: The role of families and communities in the Indian economy

Premium Partner