Skip to main content
Top

2017 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

3. The Power of Exclusion: Congress, Courts, and the Plenary Power

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter explores three important themes in constitutional immigration law. First, as creators and executors of U.S. immigration policy, Congress and the President have virtually limitless power over designating who may enter the country, under what terms, and when they must leave. Second, this plenary power over immigration law was created by a complicit U.S. Supreme Court and has never been constitutionally repudiated. The plenary power doctrine thus enjoyed the Court’s imprimatur, guaranteeing considerable political branch latitude even if laws resulted in systemic exclusion based on invidious criteria like race or national origin. Third, notwithstanding this historical deference to the political branches, the Court has provided an occasional yet essential check on legislative and executive overreaching.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
See Exodus 2:22b (“I have been a stranger in a strange land.”) (New International Version).
 
2
U.S. Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment (“No State shall…deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”).
 
3
I have written about this history, especially the relevant cases, many times before. See, e.g., Romero (2014), pp. 1–39 and Romero (2009), ch. 1.
 
4
Despite the death in early 2016 of Justice Antonin Scalia, the 2016 presidential election should continue this legacy.
 
5
Pub. L. 96–212.
 
6
Pub. L. 99–603, 100 Stat. 3445.
 
7
See Deferred Action for Childhood Removals (DACA) (2012), http://​www.​uscis.​gov/​humanitarian/​consideration-deferred-action-childhood-arrivals-daca and Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) (2014), http://​www.​uscis.​gov/​sites/​default/​files/​USCIS/​ExecutiveActions​/​EAFlier_​DAPA.​pdf.
 
8
For a thoughtful and comprehensive discussion of prosecutorial discretion within immigration law, see Wadhia (2015).
 
9
U.S. v. Texas, 579 U.S. __ (June 23, 2016) (after Scalia’s death, the 4–4 decision upheld the appeals court that struck down the 2014 executive order).
 
10
Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803).
 
11
347 U.S. 483 (1954).
 
12
130 U.S. 581 (1889).
 
13
130 U.S. at 606.
 
14
149 U.S. 698 (1893).
 
15
345 U.S. 206 (1953).
 
16
345 U.S. at 214.
 
17
345 U.S. at 212 (citing Knauff v. Shaughnessy, 338 U.S. 537, 544 [1950]).
 
18
345 U.S. at 220 (Jackson J., dissenting).
 
19
556 U.S. 662 (2009).
 
20
422 U.S. 873 (1975).
 
21
For a comprehensive study of the Roberts Court’s immigration decisions from 2009 to 2013, see Johnson (2015).
 
22
Hiroshi Motomura refers to these as phantom constitutional norms. See Motomura (1990), pp. 545–613.
 
23
559 U.S. 356 (2010).
 
24
132 S. Ct. 1479 (2012).
 
25
128 S. Ct. 2307 (2008).
 
Literature
go back to reference Chan, Sucheng, ed. 1991. Entry Denied: Exclusion and the Chinese Community in American, 1882–1943. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Chan, Sucheng, ed. 1991. Entry Denied: Exclusion and the Chinese Community in American, 1882–1943. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
go back to reference Guerin-Gonzales, Camille. 1994. Mexican Workers and the American Dream: Immigration, Repatriation, and California Farm Labor, 1900–1939. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press. Guerin-Gonzales, Camille. 1994. Mexican Workers and the American Dream: Immigration, Repatriation, and California Farm Labor, 1900–1939. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
go back to reference Harwood, Edwin. 1984. “Arrests Without Warrant: The Legal and Organizational Environment of Immigration Law Enforcement,” U.C. Davis Law Review (17): 505. Harwood, Edwin. 1984. “Arrests Without Warrant: The Legal and Organizational Environment of Immigration Law Enforcement,” U.C. Davis Law Review (17): 505.
go back to reference Hutchinson, Edward P. 1981. Legislative History of American Immigration Policy, 1798–1965. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRef Hutchinson, Edward P. 1981. Legislative History of American Immigration Policy, 1798–1965. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Johnson, Kevin R. 2015. “Immigration in the Supreme Court, 2009–2013: A New Era of Immigration Law Unexceptionalism”. Oklahoma Law Review 68: 57. Johnson, Kevin R. 2015. “Immigration in the Supreme Court, 2009–2013: A New Era of Immigration Law Unexceptionalism”. Oklahoma Law Review 68: 57.
go back to reference Kanstroom, Daniel. 2000. Deportation Nation: Outsiders in American History. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Kanstroom, Daniel. 2000. Deportation Nation: Outsiders in American History. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
go back to reference López, Ian Haney. 1996. White By Law: The Legal Construction of Race. New York: New York University Press. López, Ian Haney. 1996. White By Law: The Legal Construction of Race. New York: New York University Press.
go back to reference Motomura, Hiroshi. 1990. “Immigration Law after a Century of Plenary Power: Phantom Constitutional Norms and Statutory Interpretation,” Yale Law Journal (100): 545.CrossRef Motomura, Hiroshi. 1990. “Immigration Law after a Century of Plenary Power: Phantom Constitutional Norms and Statutory Interpretation,” Yale Law Journal (100): 545.CrossRef
go back to reference Neuman, Gerald E. 1996. Strangers to the Constitution: Immigrants, Borders, and Fundamental Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Neuman, Gerald E. 1996. Strangers to the Constitution: Immigrants, Borders, and Fundamental Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
go back to reference Romero, Victor C. 2009. Everyday Law for Immigrants. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers. Romero, Victor C. 2009. Everyday Law for Immigrants. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
go back to reference Romero, Victor C. 2010. “Interrogating Iqbal: Intent, Inertia and (a Lack of) Imagination,” Penn State Law Review. 114: 1419. Romero, Victor C. 2010. “Interrogating Iqbal: Intent, Inertia and (a Lack of) Imagination,” Penn State Law Review. 114: 1419.
go back to reference Romero, Victor C. 2014. “The Criminalization of Undocumented Migrants,” in Hidden Lives and Human Rights in the United States: Understanding the Controversies and Tragedies of Undocumented Immigration, volume 2,” ed. Lois Lorentzen, Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger. Romero, Victor C. 2014. “The Criminalization of Undocumented Migrants,” in Hidden Lives and Human Rights in the United States: Understanding the Controversies and Tragedies of Undocumented Immigration, volume 2,” ed. Lois Lorentzen, Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
go back to reference Wadhia, Shoba Sivaprasad. 2015. Beyond Deportation: The Role of Prosecutorial Discretion in Immigration Cases. New York: New York University Press.CrossRef Wadhia, Shoba Sivaprasad. 2015. Beyond Deportation: The Role of Prosecutorial Discretion in Immigration Cases. New York: New York University Press.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Power of Exclusion: Congress, Courts, and the Plenary Power
Author
Victor C. Romero
Copyright Year
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55074-3_3

Premium Partner