Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Social Indicators Research 2/2018

27-03-2017

The Relationship Between Social Capital and Individualism–Collectivism in Europe

Authors: Mai Beilmann, Liisi Kööts-Ausmees, Anu Realo

Published in: Social Indicators Research | Issue 2/2018

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to examine the relationship between social capital and individualism–collectivism in a sample of 50,417 individuals from 29 European countries using data from the European Social Survey Round 6 (2012). Social capital was measured in terms of generalized social trust and informal social networks; individualism–collectivism was operationalized via Schwartz’s Openness to Change–Conservation value dimension. Results from a hierarchical linear modeling analysis showed that less than 10% of variance in social capital indicators was found between countries, meaning that the level of social capital varies more substantively between individuals than between the countries. Openness to Change had a weak but statistically significant and positive relationship both with the indices of Generalized Social Trust and Informal Social Networks, which remained significant even when individual age, gender, education level, and domicile were controlled for. In sum, our findings show that the positive relationship between social capital and individualism that has been found at the cultural level also holds at the individual level: people who emphasize independent thought, action, and readiness to change are also more willing to believe that most people can be trusted and are more engaged in informal social networks. The relationship is, nevertheless, very weak and the strength of the association varies significantly across different European countries. This variation, however, cannot be explained by country differences in level of democracy or human development and the country’s wealth moderates only the individual level relationship between Openness to Change and Informal Social Networks. Our findings suggest that sources of social capital at the individual level can be found in people’s immediate social surroundings, as well as their everyday social interactions.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
According to Schwartz et al. (2012), it is reasonable to impute the missing values for the respondents who have up to five missing values in PVQ21 when using higher order values and cultural dimensions (e.g. openness to change vs. conservation) in research.
 
2
However, as the data was cross-sectional, no causal inferences can be made.
 
3
In order to attest our results, we produced a summary model for both indicators of social capital (i.e., Informal Social Networks and General Social Trust). This model included all variables from two previous separate HLM models (i.e., at Level 1 the predictor variables was Openness to Change–Conservation together with control variables gender, age, education level and domicile, and at Level 2 the moderators of the Level-1 association between social capital indicators and Openness to Change–Conservation were countries’ HDI, GDP, and the Democracy Index). The results of these two models showed that, at the individual level, the variable Informal Social Networks was statistically significantly associated with Openness to Change–Conservation, β = −0.27 (SE = 0.03, t = −8.63, df = 25, p < .001), and with the control variable age. General social trust was also significantly related to Openness to Change–Conservation, β = −0.13 (SE = 0.05, t = −2.44, df = 25, p < .05), and to control variables education and age. At the country level, both the association between Informal Social Networks and Openness to Change–Conservation, as well as the association between General Social Trust and Openness to Change–Conservation was moderated by the Democracy Index (γ = 0.04, SE = 0.02, t = 2.28, p < 0.05, and γ = 0.05, SE = 0.01, t = 4.21, p < 0.001, respectively). Thus, it appears that the individual-level associations between the two social capital indicators and Openness to Change–Conservation were in the same magnitude as was found using two separate models, but there were some changes in statistically significant country-level moderator effects. However, it is not advisable to use all three country-level indicators in one model because of multicollinearity issues.
 
Literature
go back to reference Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. The Academy of Management Review, 27, 17–40.CrossRef Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. The Academy of Management Review, 27, 17–40.CrossRef
go back to reference Akcomak, S., & ter Weel, B. (2011). The impact of social capital on crime: Evidence from the Netherlands. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42, 323–340.CrossRef Akcomak, S., & ter Weel, B. (2011). The impact of social capital on crime: Evidence from the Netherlands. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42, 323–340.CrossRef
go back to reference Allik, J., & Realo, A. (2004). Individualism–collectivism and social capital. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 29–49.CrossRef Allik, J., & Realo, A. (2004). Individualism–collectivism and social capital. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 29–49.CrossRef
go back to reference Arts, W., & Halman, L. (Eds.). (2004). European values at the turn of the Millennium. Leiden: Brill. Arts, W., & Halman, L. (Eds.). (2004). European values at the turn of the Millennium. Leiden: Brill.
go back to reference Beilmann, M., & Lilleoja, L. (2015). Social trust and value similarity: The relationship between social trust and human values in Europe. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 7, 19–30. Beilmann, M., & Lilleoja, L. (2015). Social trust and value similarity: The relationship between social trust and human values in Europe. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 7, 19–30.
go back to reference Beilmann, M., Mayer, B., Kasearu, K., & Realo, A. (2014). The relationship between adolescents’ social capital and individualism–collectivism in Estonia, Germany, and Russia. Child Indicators Research, 7, 589–611.CrossRef Beilmann, M., Mayer, B., Kasearu, K., & Realo, A. (2014). The relationship between adolescents’ social capital and individualism–collectivism in Estonia, Germany, and Russia. Child Indicators Research, 7, 589–611.CrossRef
go back to reference Beilmann, M., & Realo, A. (2012). Individualism–collectivism and social capital at the individual level. Trames: Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 16, 205–217.CrossRef Beilmann, M., & Realo, A. (2012). Individualism–collectivism and social capital at the individual level. Trames: Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 16, 205–217.CrossRef
go back to reference Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.CrossRef Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.CrossRef
go back to reference Dakhli, M. (2009). Investigating the effects of individualism–collectivism on trust and cooperation. Psychology Journal, 6, 90–99. Dakhli, M. (2009). Investigating the effects of individualism–collectivism on trust and cooperation. Psychology Journal, 6, 90–99.
go back to reference Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., & Schwartz, S. H. (2008). Bringing values back in: The adequacy of the European Social Survey to measure values in 20 countries. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 420–445.CrossRef Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., & Schwartz, S. H. (2008). Bringing values back in: The adequacy of the European Social Survey to measure values in 20 countries. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 420–445.CrossRef
go back to reference De Souza Briggs, X. (1997). Social capital and the cities: Advice to change agents. National Civic Review, 86, 111–117.CrossRef De Souza Briggs, X. (1997). Social capital and the cities: Advice to change agents. National Civic Review, 86, 111–117.CrossRef
go back to reference Delhey, J., & Newton, K. (2005). Predicting cross-national levels of social trust: Global pattern or Nordic exceptionalism? European Sociological Review, 21, 311–327.CrossRef Delhey, J., & Newton, K. (2005). Predicting cross-national levels of social trust: Global pattern or Nordic exceptionalism? European Sociological Review, 21, 311–327.CrossRef
go back to reference Engbers, T. A., Thompson, M. F., & Slaper, T. F. (2015). Theory and measurement in social capital research. Social Indicators Research, 1–22. Engbers, T. A., Thompson, M. F., & Slaper, T. F. (2015). Theory and measurement in social capital research. Social Indicators Research, 1–22.
go back to reference Finkelstein, M. A. (2010). Individualism/collectivism: Implications for the volunteer process. Social Behavior and Personality, 38, 445–452.CrossRef Finkelstein, M. A. (2010). Individualism/collectivism: Implications for the volunteer process. Social Behavior and Personality, 38, 445–452.CrossRef
go back to reference Gheorghiu, M. A., Vignoles, V. L., & Smith, P. B. (2009). Beyond the United States and Japan: testing Yamagishi’s emancipation theory of trust across 31 nations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72, 365–383.CrossRef Gheorghiu, M. A., Vignoles, V. L., & Smith, P. B. (2009). Beyond the United States and Japan: testing Yamagishi’s emancipation theory of trust across 31 nations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72, 365–383.CrossRef
go back to reference Guillen, L., Coromina, L., & Saris, W. E. (2011). Measurement of social participation and its place in social capital theory. Social Indicators Research, 100, 331–350.CrossRef Guillen, L., Coromina, L., & Saris, W. E. (2011). Measurement of social participation and its place in social capital theory. Social Indicators Research, 100, 331–350.CrossRef
go back to reference Halman, L., & Luijkx, R. (2006). Social capital in contemporary Europe: Evidence from the European Social Survey. Portuguese Journal of Social Science, 5, 65–90.CrossRef Halman, L., & Luijkx, R. (2006). Social capital in contemporary Europe: Evidence from the European Social Survey. Portuguese Journal of Social Science, 5, 65–90.CrossRef
go back to reference Halpern, D. (2005). Social capital. Cambridge: Polity Press. Halpern, D. (2005). Social capital. Cambridge: Polity Press.
go back to reference Hirsch, P. M., & Levin, D. Z. (1999). Umbrella advocates versus validity police: A life-cycle model. Organization Science, 10, 199–212.CrossRef Hirsch, P. M., & Levin, D. Z. (1999). Umbrella advocates versus validity police: A life-cycle model. Organization Science, 10, 199–212.CrossRef
go back to reference Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
go back to reference Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill. Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
go back to reference Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
go back to reference Hofstede, G. (2004). Epi-dialogue. In H. Vinken, J. Soeters, & P. Ester (Eds.), Comparing cultures. Dimensions of culture in a comparative perspective (pp. 270–278). Leiden: Brill. Hofstede, G. (2004). Epi-dialogue. In H. Vinken, J. Soeters, & P. Ester (Eds.), Comparing cultures. Dimensions of culture in a comparative perspective (pp. 270–278). Leiden: Brill.
go back to reference Hooghe, M., & Vanhoutte, B. (2011). Subjective well-being and social capital in Belgian communities. The impact of community characteristics on subjective well-being indicators in Belgium. Social Indicators Research, 100, 17–36.CrossRef Hooghe, M., & Vanhoutte, B. (2011). Subjective well-being and social capital in Belgian communities. The impact of community characteristics on subjective well-being indicators in Belgium. Social Indicators Research, 100, 17–36.CrossRef
go back to reference Jagodzinski, W. (2004). Methodological problems of value research. In H. Vinken, J. Soeters, & P. Ester (Eds.), Comparing cultures. Dimensions of culture in a comparative perspective (pp. 97–121). Leiden: Brill. Jagodzinski, W. (2004). Methodological problems of value research. In H. Vinken, J. Soeters, & P. Ester (Eds.), Comparing cultures. Dimensions of culture in a comparative perspective (pp. 97–121). Leiden: Brill.
go back to reference Kaasa, A. (2009). Effects of different dimensions of social capital on innovative activity: Evidence from Europe at the regional level. Technovation, 29, 218–233.CrossRef Kaasa, A. (2009). Effects of different dimensions of social capital on innovative activity: Evidence from Europe at the regional level. Technovation, 29, 218–233.CrossRef
go back to reference Kelly, B. D., Davoren, M., Mhaolain, A. N., Breen, E., & Casey, P. (2009). Social capital and suicide in 11 European countries: An ecological analysis. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 44, 971–977.CrossRef Kelly, B. D., Davoren, M., Mhaolain, A. N., Breen, E., & Casey, P. (2009). Social capital and suicide in 11 European countries: An ecological analysis. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 44, 971–977.CrossRef
go back to reference Kemmelmeier, M., Jambor, E. E., & Letner, J. (2006). Individualism and good works: Cultural variations in giving and volunteering across the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 327–344.CrossRef Kemmelmeier, M., Jambor, E. E., & Letner, J. (2006). Individualism and good works: Cultural variations in giving and volunteering across the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 327–344.CrossRef
go back to reference Kroll, C. (2011). Different things make different people happy: Examining social capital and subjective well-being by gender and parental status. Social Indicators Research, 104, 157–177.CrossRef Kroll, C. (2011). Different things make different people happy: Examining social capital and subjective well-being by gender and parental status. Social Indicators Research, 104, 157–177.CrossRef
go back to reference Lappe, F. M., & Du Bois, P. M. (1997). Building social capital without looking backward. National Civic Review, 86, 119–128.CrossRef Lappe, F. M., & Du Bois, P. M. (1997). Building social capital without looking backward. National Civic Review, 86, 119–128.CrossRef
go back to reference Lee, V. E. (2000). Using hierarchical linear modelling to study social contexts: The case of school effects. Educational Psychologist, 35, 125–141.CrossRef Lee, V. E. (2000). Using hierarchical linear modelling to study social contexts: The case of school effects. Educational Psychologist, 35, 125–141.CrossRef
go back to reference Lin, N. (2000). Inequality in social capital. Contemporary Sociology, 29, 785–795.CrossRef Lin, N. (2000). Inequality in social capital. Contemporary Sociology, 29, 785–795.CrossRef
go back to reference Lin, N., & Erickson, B. H. (2008). Generalized social trust: An international research program. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lin, N., & Erickson, B. H. (2008). Generalized social trust: An international research program. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Lippl, B. (2007). Soziales Engagement und politische Partizipation in Europa. Sozialkapital: Grundlagen und Anwendungen. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Sonderheft, 47, 420–449. Lippl, B. (2007). Soziales Engagement und politische Partizipation in Europa. Sozialkapital: Grundlagen und Anwendungen. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Sonderheft, 47, 420–449.
go back to reference Meulemann, H. (2008a). Social capital in Europe: Similarity of countries and diversity of people? Multi-level analyses of the European Social Survey 2002. Leiden: Brill. Meulemann, H. (2008a). Social capital in Europe: Similarity of countries and diversity of people? Multi-level analyses of the European Social Survey 2002. Leiden: Brill.
go back to reference Meulemann, H. (2008b). Is altruism more effective where it is required more? Collectivity-orientation and involvement in interest, issue, and religious associations. In H. Meulemann (Ed.), Social capital in Europe: Similarity of countries and diversity of people? Multi-level analyses of the European Social Survey 2002 (pp. 73–102). Leiden: Brill. Meulemann, H. (2008b). Is altruism more effective where it is required more? Collectivity-orientation and involvement in interest, issue, and religious associations. In H. Meulemann (Ed.), Social capital in Europe: Similarity of countries and diversity of people? Multi-level analyses of the European Social Survey 2002 (pp. 73–102). Leiden: Brill.
go back to reference Mõttus, R., Allik, J., & Realo, A. (2010). An attempt to validate national mean scores of conscientiousness: No necessarily paradoxical findings. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 630–640.CrossRef Mõttus, R., Allik, J., & Realo, A. (2010). An attempt to validate national mean scores of conscientiousness: No necessarily paradoxical findings. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 630–640.CrossRef
go back to reference Neira, I., Portela, M., & Vieira, E. (2010). Social capital and growth in European regions. Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, 10, 19–28. Neira, I., Portela, M., & Vieira, E. (2010). Social capital and growth in European regions. Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, 10, 19–28.
go back to reference Neller, K. (2008). Explaining social trust: What makes people trust their fellow citizens. In H. Meulemann (Ed.), Social capital in Europe: Similarity of countries and diversity of people? Multi-level analyses of the European Social Survey 2002 (pp. 103–133). Leiden: Brill. Neller, K. (2008). Explaining social trust: What makes people trust their fellow citizens. In H. Meulemann (Ed.), Social capital in Europe: Similarity of countries and diversity of people? Multi-level analyses of the European Social Survey 2002 (pp. 103–133). Leiden: Brill.
go back to reference Newton, K. (2001). Trust, social capital, civil society, and democracy. International Political Science Review, 22(2), 201–214.CrossRef Newton, K. (2001). Trust, social capital, civil society, and democracy. International Political Science Review, 22(2), 201–214.CrossRef
go back to reference Oishi, S., Schimmack, U., Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (1998). The measurement of values and individualism–collectivism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1177–1187.CrossRef Oishi, S., Schimmack, U., Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (1998). The measurement of values and individualism–collectivism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1177–1187.CrossRef
go back to reference Oyserman, D., & Lee, S. W. S. (2008). Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 311–342.CrossRef Oyserman, D., & Lee, S. W. S. (2008). Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 311–342.CrossRef
go back to reference Poortinga, W. (2006). Social capital. An individual or collective resource for health. Social Science and Medicine, 62, 292–302.CrossRef Poortinga, W. (2006). Social capital. An individual or collective resource for health. Social Science and Medicine, 62, 292–302.CrossRef
go back to reference Portes, A., & Vickstrom, E. (2011). Diversity, social capital, and cohesion. The Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 461–479.CrossRef Portes, A., & Vickstrom, E. (2011). Diversity, social capital, and cohesion. The Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 461–479.CrossRef
go back to reference Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.CrossRef Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.CrossRef
go back to reference Putnam, R. D. (2002). Democracies in flux: The evolution of social capital in contemporary society. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Putnam, R. D. (2002). Democracies in flux: The evolution of social capital in contemporary society. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models. Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models. Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
go back to reference Realo, A. (2003). Comparison of public and academic discourses: Estonian individualism and collectivism revisited. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 9, 47–77.CrossRef Realo, A. (2003). Comparison of public and academic discourses: Estonian individualism and collectivism revisited. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 9, 47–77.CrossRef
go back to reference Realo, A., & Allik, J. (2009). On the relationship between social capital and individualism–collectivism. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 1–16.CrossRef Realo, A., & Allik, J. (2009). On the relationship between social capital and individualism–collectivism. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 1–16.CrossRef
go back to reference Realo, A., Allik, J., & Greenfield, B. (2008). Radius of trust: Social capital in relation to familism and institutional collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 447–462.CrossRef Realo, A., Allik, J., & Greenfield, B. (2008). Radius of trust: Social capital in relation to familism and institutional collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 447–462.CrossRef
go back to reference Realo, A., Allik, J., & Vadi, M. (1997). The hierarchical structure of collectivism. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 93–116.CrossRef Realo, A., Allik, J., & Vadi, M. (1997). The hierarchical structure of collectivism. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 93–116.CrossRef
go back to reference Realo, A., Koido, K., Ceulemans, E., & Allik, J. (2002). Three components of individualism. European Journal of Personality, 16, 163–184.CrossRef Realo, A., Koido, K., Ceulemans, E., & Allik, J. (2002). Three components of individualism. European Journal of Personality, 16, 163–184.CrossRef
go back to reference Rothstein, B. (2002). Sweden: Social capital in the social democratic state. In R. Putnam (Ed.), Democracies in flux: The evolution of social capital in contemporary society (pp. 289–331). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Rothstein, B. (2002). Sweden: Social capital in the social democratic state. In R. Putnam (Ed.), Democracies in flux: The evolution of social capital in contemporary society (pp. 289–331). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Ruiter, S., & De Graaf, N. D. (2008). Socio-economic payoffs of voluntary association involvement. A Dutch life course study. European Sociological Review, 21, 1–18. Ruiter, S., & De Graaf, N. D. (2008). Socio-economic payoffs of voluntary association involvement. A Dutch life course study. European Sociological Review, 21, 1–18.
go back to reference Saxton, G. D., & Benson, M. A. (2005). Social capital and the growth of the nonprofit sector. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 16–35.CrossRef Saxton, G. D., & Benson, M. A. (2005). Social capital and the growth of the nonprofit sector. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 16–35.CrossRef
go back to reference Schmitt-Beck, R. (2008). Mass media and social capital in Europe: Evidence from multilevel analyses. In H. Meulemann (Ed.), Social capital in Europe: Similarity of countries and diversity of people? Multi-level analyses of the European Social Survey 2002 (pp. 159–187). Leiden: Brill. Schmitt-Beck, R. (2008). Mass media and social capital in Europe: Evidence from multilevel analyses. In H. Meulemann (Ed.), Social capital in Europe: Similarity of countries and diversity of people? Multi-level analyses of the European Social Survey 2002 (pp. 159–187). Leiden: Brill.
go back to reference Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, Ç. Kagitçibasi, S. C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 85–119). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, Ç. Kagitçibasi, S. C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 85–119). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
go back to reference Schwartz, S. (2004b). Mapping and interpreting cultural differences around the world. In H. Vinken, J. Soeters, & P. Ester (Eds.), Comparing cultures. Dimensions of culture in a comparative perspective (pp. 43–73). Leiden: Brill. Schwartz, S. (2004b). Mapping and interpreting cultural differences around the world. In H. Vinken, J. Soeters, & P. Ester (Eds.), Comparing cultures. Dimensions of culture in a comparative perspective (pp. 43–73). Leiden: Brill.
go back to reference Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Value orientations: Measurement, antecedents and consequences across nations. In R. Jowell, C. Roberts, & R. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Measuring attitudes crossnationally—Lessons from the European Social Survey (pp. 161–193). London: Sage. Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Value orientations: Measurement, antecedents and consequences across nations. In R. Jowell, C. Roberts, & R. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Measuring attitudes crossnationally—Lessons from the European Social Survey (pp. 161–193). London: Sage.
go back to reference Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., et al. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 663–688.CrossRef Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., et al. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 663–688.CrossRef
go back to reference Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 519–542.CrossRef Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 519–542.CrossRef
go back to reference Smith, P. B., & Schwartz, S. H. (1997). Values. In J. W. Berry, M. H. Segall, & C. Kagitcibasi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 77–118). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Smith, P. B., & Schwartz, S. H. (1997). Values. In J. W. Berry, M. H. Segall, & C. Kagitcibasi (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 77–118). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
go back to reference Trommsdorff, G., Mayer, B., & Albert, I. (2004). Dimensions of culture in intra-cultural comparisons. Individualism/collectivism and family-related values in three generations. In H. Vinken, J. Soeters, & P. Ester (Eds.), Comparing cultures. Dimensions of culture in a comparative perspective (pp. 157–179). Leiden: Brill. Trommsdorff, G., Mayer, B., & Albert, I. (2004). Dimensions of culture in intra-cultural comparisons. Individualism/collectivism and family-related values in three generations. In H. Vinken, J. Soeters, & P. Ester (Eds.), Comparing cultures. Dimensions of culture in a comparative perspective (pp. 157–179). Leiden: Brill.
go back to reference Uslaner, E. M. (1999). Democracy and social capital. In M. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and trust (pp. 121–150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Uslaner, E. M. (1999). Democracy and social capital. In M. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and trust (pp. 121–150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Uslaner, E. M. (2000). Producing and consuming trust. Political Science Quarterly, 115(4), 569–590.CrossRef Uslaner, E. M. (2000). Producing and consuming trust. Political Science Quarterly, 115(4), 569–590.CrossRef
go back to reference Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference van der Meer, T., Scheepers, P., & de Grotenhuis, M. (2008). Does the state affect the informal connections between its citizens? New institutionalist explanations of social participation in everyday life. In H. Meulemann (Ed.), Social capital in Europe: Similarity of countries and diversity of people? Multi-level analyses of the European Social Survey 2002 (pp. 41–72). Leiden: Brill. van der Meer, T., Scheepers, P., & de Grotenhuis, M. (2008). Does the state affect the informal connections between its citizens? New institutionalist explanations of social participation in everyday life. In H. Meulemann (Ed.), Social capital in Europe: Similarity of countries and diversity of people? Multi-level analyses of the European Social Survey 2002 (pp. 41–72). Leiden: Brill.
go back to reference Van Lange, P. A. M. (2015). Generalized trust: Four lessons from genetics and culture. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 71–76.CrossRef Van Lange, P. A. M. (2015). Generalized trust: Four lessons from genetics and culture. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 71–76.CrossRef
go back to reference Verkasalo, M., Lönnqvist, J.-E., Lipsanen, J., & Helkama, K. (2009). European norms and equations for a two dimensional presentation of values as measured with Schwartz’s 21-item portrait values questionnaire. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 780–792.CrossRef Verkasalo, M., Lönnqvist, J.-E., Lipsanen, J., & Helkama, K. (2009). European norms and equations for a two dimensional presentation of values as measured with Schwartz’s 21-item portrait values questionnaire. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 780–792.CrossRef
go back to reference von dem Knesebeck, O., Dragano, N., & Siegrist, J. (2005). Social capital and self-rated health in 21 European countries. GMS Psycho-Social-Medicine, 2, 1–9. von dem Knesebeck, O., Dragano, N., & Siegrist, J. (2005). Social capital and self-rated health in 21 European countries. GMS Psycho-Social-Medicine, 2, 1–9.
go back to reference Whiteley, P. F. (2000). Economic growth and social capital. Political Studies, 48, 443–466.CrossRef Whiteley, P. F. (2000). Economic growth and social capital. Political Studies, 48, 443–466.CrossRef
go back to reference Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development. Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27, 151–208.CrossRef Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development. Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27, 151–208.CrossRef
go back to reference Wuthnow, R. (2002). The United States: Bridging the privileged and the marginalized. In R. Putnam (Ed.), Democracies in flux: The evolution of generalized social trust in contemporary society (pp. 59–102). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Wuthnow, R. (2002). The United States: Bridging the privileged and the marginalized. In R. Putnam (Ed.), Democracies in flux: The evolution of generalized social trust in contemporary society (pp. 59–102). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1993). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 129–166.CrossRef Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1993). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 129–166.CrossRef
go back to reference Zmerli, S., & Newton, K. (2008). Social trust and attitudes toward democracy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 706–724.CrossRef Zmerli, S., & Newton, K. (2008). Social trust and attitudes toward democracy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 706–724.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Relationship Between Social Capital and Individualism–Collectivism in Europe
Authors
Mai Beilmann
Liisi Kööts-Ausmees
Anu Realo
Publication date
27-03-2017
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Social Indicators Research / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0303-8300
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0921
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1614-4

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Social Indicators Research 2/2018 Go to the issue