Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Management International Review
Published in: Management International Review 4/2013

01-08-2013 | Research Article

The Role of Social Values, Accounting Values and Institutions in Determining Accounting Conservatism

Authors: Prof. Stephen B. Salter, Assoc. Prof. Tony Kang, Asst. Prof. Giorgio Gotti, Prof. Timothy S. Doupnik

Published in: Management International Review | Issue 4/2013

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

  • The extant literature on cross cultural differences in conservatism finds that a mix of institutional and economic variables influences differences in the level of conservatism across countries. Using the modified Gray model Doupnik and Tsakumis (J Acc Lit 3(1): 1–20, 2004) we examine whether societal values are a neglected explanatory factor for differences in levels of accounting conservatism across countries.
  • Both unconditional and conditional conservatism are measured. Social values are measured using both a composite value for conservatism Hope et al. (J Acc Public Policy 27(5): 353–357, 2008) and individual values from Hofstede and Hofstede in Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (2nd ed., New York, McGraw-Hill, 2005). A test sample of 89,481 firm-years from 1989 to 2006, compressed to 341 (or 342) country-year observations from 22 countries provides the data for OLS regressions.
  • We find that after controlling for previously documented legal and financial institutional variables, both conditional and unconditional accounting conservatism are greater in countries with more conservative societal and accounting values. The Hofstede value of femininity (the importance of caring for others) is also significant for both measures of conservatism.
  • These findings provide a more complete model for further testing of accounting conservatism and other topics using societal values. They also provide support for the modified Gray model using archival data. Finally, while both dimensions of conservatism matter and while they share some common explanators, both have unique additional influencing factors in culture and institutions.
previous article Antecedents to Government Relationship Building and the Institutional Contingencies in a Transition Economy
next article Erratum to: The Role of Social Values, Accounting Values and Institutions in Determining Accounting Conservatism

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Management International Review

MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL REVIEW is a double-blind refereed journal that aims at the advancement and dissemination of research in the fields of International Management.

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Footnotes
1
These beliefs and actions predate the European settlement of the United States.
 
2
Ball et al. (2008, p. 194) note that the unconditional definition of conservatism has been employed in much prior literature, including the international accounting literature (e.g., Gray 1980). Notably, creditor protection has been offered as the main explanation for the conservative balance sheets of German companies in particular.
 
3
Depending on the model specification.
 
4
These institutional variables include English, French and Scandinavian legal systems which are dummy variables that receive the value of 1 if the firm/year’s legal origin is English, French and Scandinavian, 17 respectively, and zero otherwise. Debt/GNP, Equity/GNP, Rule of Law, Corruption and Creditors’ Rights are extracted from La Porta et al. (1997, 1998).
 
5
Gray’s (1988) accounting values have been widely tested without definitive results. See Doupnik and Tsakumis (2004) for a review of this literature.
 
6
We compute the scores for each country’s AVC using Hofstede’s (1980) social values (SC) for uncertainty avoidance minus the sum of individualism and masculinity score.
 
7
For example, Francis and Wang (2008) assume that the ratio current accruals to sales is equal to 0.15 for a firm in year t-1, based on sales of US$ 100 and current accruals of US$ 15 in t-1. If sales in year t are US$ 140, then predicted current accruals in year t would be US$ 140*0.15 = US$ 21. The same procedure is used for predicted depreciation expense, which is based on the prior year’s ration of depreciation expense to gross PPE.
 
8
DATA items refer to the appropriate items in the COMPUSTAT data base.
 
9
This approach has advantages over pooling firm-level observations across countries or simply using country-level information in the following ways. First, the results under this approach will not be affected by different numbers of observations from each country, which can bias the results towards more heavily represented countries. Second, this approach alleviates concerns associated with cross-sectional dependence in the data, which can inflate the test statistics. Third, by examining country-year rather than country-level observations, we exploit possible year-to-year variations in accounting conservatism across countries.
 
10
We use DATA32 from Compustat Global, which represents the income or loss reported by a company after expenses and losses have been subtracted from all revenues and gains for the fiscal period, including extraordinary items and discontinued operations.
 
11
For our second test of conditional conservatism using the Givoly and Hayn (2000) operationalization, we use the variable name MKTCAPRES which is calculated using the initial MKTCAP cariable amended as follows. “Two variables, MKTCAP and ENGLISH are highly correlated with AVC, our cultural conservatism measure. To avoid multicollinearity issues, we “orthogonalize” these variables: We regress MKTCAP and ENGLISH on AVC and use the residual of the regression as dependent variable in our models.” These are referred to as MKTCAPRES and ENGLISHRES in Table 6 of the results.
 
12
A firm is considered privately owned if the State is not a known shareholder in it.
 
13
Although later regression analysis finds when other variables are added they become significant.
 
14
Ball et al. (2008, p. 178) refer to this as “asymmetrically timely loss recognition relative to gain recognition” i.e., the incremental timely loss regression coefficient which measures the extent to which losses are reported more quickly than gains.
 
Literature
Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. (2010). Comparative and international corporate governance. Annals of the Academy of Management, 4(1), 486–556.
Avner, G. (2006). Institutions and the path to the modern economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ball, R. (2004). Daimler-Benz AG: Evolution of corporate governance from a code-law “stakeholder” to a common-law “shareholder value” system. In A. Hopwood et al. (Eds.), The economics and politics of accounting: international perspectives (pp. 103–143). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Ball, R., & Shivakumar, L. (2005). Earnings quality in UK private firms: Comparative loss recognition timeliness. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1/2), 83–128.CrossRef
Ball, R., Kothari, S. P., & Robin, A. (2000). The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29(1), 1–51.CrossRef
Ball, R., Robin, A., & Wu, J. S. (2003). Incentives versus standards: properties of accounting income in four East Asian countries. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 36(1/3), 235–270.CrossRef
Ball, R., Robin, A., & Sadka, G. (2008). Is financial reporting shaped by equity markets or by debt markets? An international study of timeliness and conservatism. Review of Accounting Studies, 13(2/3), 168–205.CrossRef
Basu, S. (1997). The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(1), 3–37.CrossRef
Beuselinck, C., Joos, P., & Van der Meulen, S. (2007). International earnings comparability. http://​ssrn.​com/​abstract=​1014086.​ Accessed 3 May 2012.
Bushman, R. M., & Piotroski, J. D. (2006). Financial reporting incentives for conservative accounting: The influence of legal and political institutions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(1/2), 107–148.CrossRef
Chui, A. C. W., Lloyd, A. E., & Kwok, C. C. Y. (2002). The determination of capital structure: Is national culture a missing piece to the puzzle? Journal of International Business Studies, 33(1), 99–127.CrossRef
Daniel, S. J., Cieslewicz, J. K., & Pourjalali, H. (2012). The impact of national economic culture and country-level institutional environment on corporate governance practices. Management International Review, 52(3), 365–394.CrossRef
Defond, M. L., & Park, C. W. (2001). The reversal of abnormal accruals and the market valuation of earnings surprises. Accounting Review, 76(3), 375–404.CrossRef
Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2008). The law and economics of self-dealing. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(3), 430–465.CrossRef
Ding, Y., Jeanjean, T., & Stolowy, H. (2005). Why do national GAAP differ from IAS? The role of culture. The International Journal of Accounting, 40(4), 325–350.CrossRef
Doupnik, T. S., & Tsakumis, G. T. (2004). A critical review of tests of Gray’s theory of cultural relevance and suggestions for future research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 23(1), 1–48.
Doupnik, T. S., & Richter, M. (2004). The impact of culture on the interpretation of “in context” verbal probability expressions. Journal of International Accounting Research, 3(1), 1–20.CrossRef
Doupnik, T. S., & Riccio, E. L. (2006). The influence of conservatism and secrecy on the interpretation of verbal probability expressions in the Anglo and Latin cultural areas. The International Journal of Accounting, 41(3), 237–261.CrossRef
Eddie, I. A. (1990). Asia Pacific cultural values and accounting systems. Asia Pacific International Management Forum, 16, 22–30.
European Federation of Accountants (FEE). (1997). FEE comparative study on conceptual accounting frameworks in Europe. Brussels: FEE.
Francis, J. R., & Wang, D. (2008). The joint effect of investor protection and big 4 audits on earnings quality around the world. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(1), 157–191.
Garcia Lara, J. M., & Mora, A. (2004). Balance sheet versus earnings conservatism in Europe. European Accounting Review, 13(2), 261–292.CrossRef
Gassen, J., Fullbier, R. U., & Sellhorn, T. (2006). International differences in conditional conservatism: The role of unconditional conservatism and income smoothing. European Accounting Review, 15(4), 527–564.CrossRef
Giner, B., & Rees, W. (2001). On the asymmetric recognition of good and bad news in France, Germany and the United Kingdom. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 28(9/10), 1285–1331.CrossRef
Givoly, D., & Hayn, C. (2000). The changing time-series properties of earnings, cash flows and accruals: Has financial reporting become more conservative? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29(3), 287–320.CrossRef
Gray, S. J. (1980). The impact of international accounting differences from a security analysis perspective. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 64–76.CrossRef
Gray, S. J. (1988). Towards a theory of cultural on the development of accounting influence systems internationally. Abacus, 24(1), 1–15.CrossRef
Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2006). Does culture affect economic outcomes? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 23–48.CrossRef
Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2006). International differences in the cost of equity capital: Do legal institutions and securities regulation matter? Journal of Accounting Research, 44(3), 485–531.CrossRef
Haller, A. (2003). Accounting in Germany. In P. A. Walter et al. (Eds.), International Accounting (pp. 91–128). London: International Thomson Business Press.
Han, S., Kang, T., Salter, S., & Yoo, Y. K. (2010) A cross-country study on the effects of national culture on earnings discretion. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(1), 123–141.CrossRef
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. J. (2005). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hope, O. K. (2003). Firm-level disclosures and the relative roles of culture and legal origin. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 14(3), 218–248.CrossRef
Hope, O. K., Kang, T., Thomas, W., & Yoo, Y. K. (2008). Culture and auditor choice: A test of the secrecy hypothesis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27(5), 353–357.CrossRef
Kanagaretnam, K., Lim, C. Y., & Lobo, G. J. (2011). Effects of national culture on earnings quality of banks. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(6), 853–874.CrossRef
Kwok, C. C. Y., & Tadesse, S. (2006). National culture and financial systems. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(2), 227–247.CrossRef
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of Finance, 52(3), 1131–1150.CrossRef
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–55.CrossRef
Moore, K., & Lewis, D. (1999). Birth of the multinational. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
Nobes, C. W. (1998). Towards a general model of the reasons for international differences in financial reporting. Abacus, 34(2), 162–187.CrossRef
Penndorf, B. (Sept., 1930). The relation of taxation to the history of the balance sheet. The Accounting Review, 5(3), 243–251.
Raonic, I., McLeay, S., & Asimakopoulos, I. (2004). The timeliness of income recognition by European companies: An analysis of institutional and market complexity. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 31(1/2), 115–148.CrossRef
Salter, S. B., & Lewis, P. A. (2011). Shades of Gray: an empirical examination of Gray’s model of culture and income measurement practices using 20-F data. Advances in Accounting, 27(1), 132–142.CrossRef
Salter, S. B., & Niswander, F. (1995). Cultural influence on the development of accounting systems internationally: A test of Gray’s (1988) theory. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(2), 379–397.CrossRef
Schultz Jr., J. J., & Lopez, T. J. (2001). The impact of national influence on accounting estimates: Implications for international accounting standard-setters. The International Journal of Accounting, 36(3), 271–290.CrossRef
Sudarwan, M., & Fogarty, T. J. (1996). Culture and accounting in Indonesia: An empirical examination. International Journal of Accounting, 31(4), 463–481.CrossRef
Williamson, O. E. (2000). The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595–613.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Role of Social Values, Accounting Values and Institutions in Determining Accounting Conservatism
Authors
Prof. Stephen B. Salter
Assoc. Prof. Tony Kang
Asst. Prof. Giorgio Gotti
Prof. Timothy S. Doupnik
Publication date
01-08-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Management International Review / Issue 4/2013
Print ISSN: 0938-8249
Electronic ISSN: 1861-8901
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-012-0152-1

Other articles of this Issue 4/2013

Management International Review 4/2013 Go to the issue

Research Article

In at the Deep End of Firm Internationalization

Research Article

Antecedents to Government Relationship Building and the Institutional Contingencies in a Transition Economy

Research Article

Procedural Justice, Not Absorptive Capacity, Matters in Multinational Enterprise ICT Transfers

Erratum

Erratum to: The Role of Social Values, Accounting Values and Institutions in Determining Accounting Conservatism

Research Article

Dual-Option Subsidiaries and Exit Decisions During Times of Economic Crisis