Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 3/2018

23-07-2018

Towards a learning-oriented assessment to improve students’ learning—a critical review of literature

Authors: Wenjie Zeng, Fuquan Huang, Lu Yu, Siyu Chen

Published in: Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability | Issue 3/2018

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Learning-oriented assessment (LOA), a concept coined by Carless, has emerged in Europe, Canada, the USA, and the Asia-Pacific Region as an alternative assessment methodology. LOA evolved from both summative assessment and formative assessment, and its framework comprises three integrated components, assessment for learning, assessment as learning, and assessment of learning. While a few studies have provided information about the connections among assessment for, of, and as learning, the purpose of this review is to summarize what is state of the art of LOA, and we aim to examine the history and the nature as well as the strategy of developing LOA. We conducted a transformed critical review of LOA to address these questions. To be specific, the related studies were searched between January 1971 and December 2016, using specific inclusion criteria to remove irrelevant documents. Results provide the publication types of the selected studies and the reported approaches to LOA, trace the evolution of classroom assessment from summative and formative assessment to LOA in order to clarify the historical foundations of LOA, and indicate its nature from the dimensions of components, functions, conceptual frameworks, and principles, as well as to illustrate strategies for using it in the classroom. The findings of a deep analysis of 48 publications were then used to define a holistic framework for LOA and a dynamic framework for its development and also yield important recommendations for practice and future research. Finally, we propose the conclusion.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Abdul Aziz, M. N., & Yusoff, N. (2016). Improving process writing with the use authentic assessment. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 5(3), 200–204. Abdul Aziz, M. N., & Yusoff, N. (2016). Improving process writing with the use authentic assessment. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 5(3), 200–204.
go back to reference Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT–TPCK: advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers and Education, 52, 154–168.CrossRef Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT–TPCK: advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers and Education, 52, 154–168.CrossRef
go back to reference *Antoniou, P., & James, M. (2014). Exploring formative assessment in primary school classrooms: developing a framework of actions and strategies. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26(2), 153–176. *Antoniou, P., & James, M. (2014). Exploring formative assessment in primary school classrooms: developing a framework of actions and strategies. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26(2), 153–176.
go back to reference *Baas, D., Castelijns, J., Vermeulen, M., Martens, R., & Segers, M. (2015). The relation between assessment for learning and elementary students’ cognitive and metacognitive strategy use. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 33–46. *Baas, D., Castelijns, J., Vermeulen, M., Martens, R., & Segers, M. (2015). The relation between assessment for learning and elementary students’ cognitive and metacognitive strategy use. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 33–46.
go back to reference Bandiera, M., & Bruno, C. (2006). Active/cooperative learning in schools. Journal of Biological Education, 40(3), 130–134.CrossRef Bandiera, M., & Bruno, C. (2006). Active/cooperative learning in schools. Journal of Biological Education, 40(3), 130–134.CrossRef
go back to reference Bayat, A., Jamshidipour, A., & Hashemi, M. (2017). The beneficial impacts of applying formative assessment on Iranian University students’ anxiety reduction and listening efficacy. International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching, 5(2), 1–11. Bayat, A., Jamshidipour, A., & Hashemi, M. (2017). The beneficial impacts of applying formative assessment on Iranian University students’ anxiety reduction and listening efficacy. International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching, 5(2), 1–11.
go back to reference Bell, B., & Kozlowski, S. (2008). Active learning: effects of core training design elements on self-regulatory processes, learning, and adaptability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 296–316.CrossRef Bell, B., & Kozlowski, S. (2008). Active learning: effects of core training design elements on self-regulatory processes, learning, and adaptability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 296–316.CrossRef
go back to reference *Bennett, R. (2010). Cognitively based assessment of, for, and as learning (CBAL): a preliminary theory of action for summative and formative assessment. Measurement, 8(2), 70–91. *Bennett, R. (2010). Cognitively based assessment of, for, and as learning (CBAL): a preliminary theory of action for summative and formative assessment. Measurement, 8(2), 70–91.
go back to reference Bennett, R. (2011). Formative assessment: a critical review. Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice, 18(1), 5–25.CrossRef Bennett, R. (2011). Formative assessment: a critical review. Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice, 18(1), 5–25.CrossRef
go back to reference Bennett, R., & Gitomer, D. (2009). Transforming k–12 assessment: integrating accountability testing, formative assessment and professional support. In C. Wyatt-Smith, & J. J. Cumming (Eds.), Educational assessment in the 21st century (pp. 43–61). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRef Bennett, R., & Gitomer, D. (2009). Transforming k–12 assessment: integrating accountability testing, formative assessment and professional support. In C. Wyatt-Smith, & J. J. Cumming (Eds.), Educational assessment in the 21st century (pp. 43–61). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference Bernauer, J., & Fuller, R. (2017). Beyond measurement-driven instruction: achieving deep learning based on constructivist learning theory, integrated assessment, and a flipped classroom approach. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 28(2), 111–132. Bernauer, J., & Fuller, R. (2017). Beyond measurement-driven instruction: achieving deep learning based on constructivist learning theory, integrated assessment, and a flipped classroom approach. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 28(2), 111–132.
go back to reference Bevitt, S. (2015). Assessment innovation and student experience: a new assessment challenge and call for a multi-perspective approach to assessment research. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(1), 103–119.CrossRef Bevitt, S. (2015). Assessment innovation and student experience: a new assessment challenge and call for a multi-perspective approach to assessment research. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(1), 103–119.CrossRef
go back to reference Beyer, B., Herrmann, D., Meek, G., & Rapley, E. (2010). What it means to be an accounting professor: a concise career guide for doctoral students in accounting. Issues in Accounting Education, 25(2), 227–244.CrossRef Beyer, B., Herrmann, D., Meek, G., & Rapley, E. (2010). What it means to be an accounting professor: a concise career guide for doctoral students in accounting. Issues in Accounting Education, 25(2), 227–244.CrossRef
go back to reference *Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139–148. *Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139–148.
go back to reference *Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: putting it into practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press. *Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: putting it into practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
go back to reference *Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & William, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 9–21. *Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & William, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 9–21.
go back to reference Blasco-Arcas, L., Buil, I., Hernández-Ortega, B., & Sese, F. (2013). Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance. Computers and Education, 62, 102–110.CrossRef Blasco-Arcas, L., Buil, I., Hernández-Ortega, B., & Sese, F. (2013). Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance. Computers and Education, 62, 102–110.CrossRef
go back to reference *Bloom, B., Hastings, J., & Madaus, G. (1971). Handbook on the formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGraw-Hill. *Bloom, B., Hastings, J., & Madaus, G. (1971). Handbook on the formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
go back to reference Bowers, P., & Ryan, S. (2013). Models of faculty assessment and review: an exploration of forty peer and aspirational institutions. International Journal of University Teaching and Faculty Development, 4(2), 91–100. Bowers, P., & Ryan, S. (2013). Models of faculty assessment and review: an exploration of forty peer and aspirational institutions. International Journal of University Teaching and Faculty Development, 4(2), 91–100.
go back to reference Bullough Jr., R. (2001). Pedagogical content knowledge circa 1907 and 1987: a study in the history of an idea. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(6), 655–666.CrossRef Bullough Jr., R. (2001). Pedagogical content knowledge circa 1907 and 1987: a study in the history of an idea. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(6), 655–666.CrossRef
go back to reference *Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219–233. *Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219–233.
go back to reference *Carless, D. (2007). Learning-oriented assessment: conceptual bases and practical implications. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(1), 57–66. *Carless, D. (2007). Learning-oriented assessment: conceptual bases and practical implications. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(1), 57–66.
go back to reference *Carless, D. (2015). Exploring learning-oriented assessment processes. Higher Education, 69(6), 963–976. *Carless, D. (2015). Exploring learning-oriented assessment processes. Higher Education, 69(6), 963–976.
go back to reference *Carless, D., Joughin, G., & Liu, N. (2006a). How assessment supports learning: Learning-oriented assessment in action. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. *Carless, D., Joughin, G., & Liu, N. (2006a). How assessment supports learning: Learning-oriented assessment in action. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
go back to reference *Carless, D., Joughin, G., & Mok, M. M.C. (2006b). Learning-oriented assessment: principles and practice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 395–398. *Carless, D., Joughin, G., & Mok, M. M.C. (2006b). Learning-oriented assessment: principles and practice. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 395–398.
go back to reference *Clark, I. (2012). Formative assessment: assessment is for self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24(2), 205–249. *Clark, I. (2012). Formative assessment: assessment is for self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24(2), 205–249.
go back to reference Colantonio, J. (2005). Assessment for a learning society. Principal Leadership, 6(2), 22–26. Colantonio, J. (2005). Assessment for a learning society. Principal Leadership, 6(2), 22–26.
go back to reference Cox, S., & Robinson-Pant, A. (2008). Power, participation and decision making in the primary classroom: children as action researchers. Educational Action Research, 16(4), 457–468.CrossRef Cox, S., & Robinson-Pant, A. (2008). Power, participation and decision making in the primary classroom: children as action researchers. Educational Action Research, 16(4), 457–468.CrossRef
go back to reference *Curry, K., Mwavita, M., Holter, A., & Harris, E. (2016). Getting assessment right at the classroom level: using formative assessment for decision making. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28(1), 89–104. *Curry, K., Mwavita, M., Holter, A., & Harris, E. (2016). Getting assessment right at the classroom level: using formative assessment for decision making. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28(1), 89–104.
go back to reference Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education—a systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 80–91.CrossRef Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education—a systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 80–91.CrossRef
go back to reference DeLuca, C., & Klinger, D. (2010). Assessment literacy development: identifying gaps in teacher candidates’ learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 17(4), 419–438.CrossRef DeLuca, C., & Klinger, D. (2010). Assessment literacy development: identifying gaps in teacher candidates’ learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 17(4), 419–438.CrossRef
go back to reference DeLuca, C., Chavez, T., Bellara, A., & Cao, C. (2013). Pedagogies for preservice assessment education: supporting teacher candidates’ assessment literacy development. The Teacher Educator, 48(2), 128–142.CrossRef DeLuca, C., Chavez, T., Bellara, A., & Cao, C. (2013). Pedagogies for preservice assessment education: supporting teacher candidates’ assessment literacy development. The Teacher Educator, 48(2), 128–142.CrossRef
go back to reference Depaepe, F., Verschaffel, L., & Kelchtermans, G. (2013). Pedagogical content knowledge: a systematic review of the way in which the concept has pervaded mathematics educational research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34(1), 12–25.CrossRef Depaepe, F., Verschaffel, L., & Kelchtermans, G. (2013). Pedagogical content knowledge: a systematic review of the way in which the concept has pervaded mathematics educational research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34(1), 12–25.CrossRef
go back to reference Dobson, S. (2010). Book review: how assessment supports learning. Learning-oriented assessment in action. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 17(1), 105–112. Dobson, S. (2010). Book review: how assessment supports learning. Learning-oriented assessment in action. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 17(1), 105–112.
go back to reference Duckor, B., Holmberg, C., & Becker, J. (2017). Making moves: formative assessment in mathematics. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 22(6), 334–342.CrossRef Duckor, B., Holmberg, C., & Becker, J. (2017). Making moves: formative assessment in mathematics. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 22(6), 334–342.CrossRef
go back to reference *Earl, L. (2003). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press. *Earl, L. (2003). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
go back to reference Elden, M., & Chisholm, R. (1993). Emerging varieties of action research: introduction to the special issue. Human Relations, 46(2), 121–142.CrossRef Elden, M., & Chisholm, R. (1993). Emerging varieties of action research: introduction to the special issue. Human Relations, 46(2), 121–142.CrossRef
go back to reference Elliott, J. (2003). Dynamic assessment in educational settings: realizing potential. Educational Review, 55, 15–32.CrossRef Elliott, J. (2003). Dynamic assessment in educational settings: realizing potential. Educational Review, 55, 15–32.CrossRef
go back to reference *Embretson, S. (2010). Cognitively based assessment and the integration of summative and formative assessments. Measurement, 8(4), 180–184. *Embretson, S. (2010). Cognitively based assessment and the integration of summative and formative assessments. Measurement, 8(4), 180–184.
go back to reference Fan, Y.-C., Wang, T.-H., & Wang, K.-H. (2011). A web-based model for developing assessment literacy of secondary in-service teachers. Computers and Education, 57(2), 1727–1740.CrossRef Fan, Y.-C., Wang, T.-H., & Wang, K.-H. (2011). A web-based model for developing assessment literacy of secondary in-service teachers. Computers and Education, 57(2), 1727–1740.CrossRef
go back to reference Fernández-Balboa, J.-M., & Stiehl, J. (1995). The generic nature of pedagogical content knowledge among college professors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(3), 293–306.CrossRef Fernández-Balboa, J.-M., & Stiehl, J. (1995). The generic nature of pedagogical content knowledge among college professors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(3), 293–306.CrossRef
go back to reference Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.CrossRef Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.CrossRef
go back to reference Flavell, J. (1985). Cognitive development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Inc. Flavell, J. (1985). Cognitive development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Inc.
go back to reference Flynn, B., Kakibara, S., Schroeder, R., Bates, K., & Flynn, E. (1990). Empirical research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 9(2), 250–284.CrossRef Flynn, B., Kakibara, S., Schroeder, R., Bates, K., & Flynn, E. (1990). Empirical research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 9(2), 250–284.CrossRef
go back to reference Fourie, M., Stein, D., Solms, M., Gobodo-Madikizela, P., & Decety, J. (2017). Empathy and moral emotions in post-apartheid South Africa: an fMRI investigation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(6), 881–892.CrossRef Fourie, M., Stein, D., Solms, M., Gobodo-Madikizela, P., & Decety, J. (2017). Empathy and moral emotions in post-apartheid South Africa: an fMRI investigation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(6), 881–892.CrossRef
go back to reference Fraser, B. (1981). Learning environment in curriculum evaluation: a review. Evaluation in Education, 5(1), 1–93.CrossRef Fraser, B. (1981). Learning environment in curriculum evaluation: a review. Evaluation in Education, 5(1), 1–93.CrossRef
go back to reference *Friesen, S. (2016). Assessment for learning in a math classroom. Cham: Springer International Publishing.CrossRef *Friesen, S. (2016). Assessment for learning in a math classroom. Cham: Springer International Publishing.CrossRef
go back to reference *Gibbons, S., & Kankkonen, B. (2011). Assessment as learning in physical education: making assessment meaningful for secondary school students. Physical and Health Education Journal, 76(4), 6–12. *Gibbons, S., & Kankkonen, B. (2011). Assessment as learning in physical education: making assessment meaningful for secondary school students. Physical and Health Education Journal, 76(4), 6–12.
go back to reference *Gikandi, J., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: a review of the literature. Computers and Education, 57(4), 2333–2351. *Gikandi, J., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: a review of the literature. Computers and Education, 57(4), 2333–2351.
go back to reference Gotch, C., & French, B. (2014). A systematic review of assessment literacy measures. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 33(2), 14–18.CrossRef Gotch, C., & French, B. (2014). A systematic review of assessment literacy measures. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 33(2), 14–18.CrossRef
go back to reference Grant, M., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108.CrossRef Grant, M., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108.CrossRef
go back to reference Guiffrida, D., Douthit, K., Lynch, M., & Mackie, K. (2011). Publishing action research in counseling journals. Journal of Counseling and Development, 89(3), 282–287.CrossRef Guiffrida, D., Douthit, K., Lynch, M., & Mackie, K. (2011). Publishing action research in counseling journals. Journal of Counseling and Development, 89(3), 282–287.CrossRef
go back to reference Heap, N., Kear, K., & Bissell, C. (2004). An overview of ICT-based assessment for engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 29(2), 241–250.CrossRef Heap, N., Kear, K., & Bissell, C. (2004). An overview of ICT-based assessment for engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 29(2), 241–250.CrossRef
go back to reference *Heitink, M., Kleij, F., Veldkamp, B., Schildkamp, K., & Kippers, W. (2016). A systematic review of prerequisites for implementing assessment for learning in classroom practice. Educational Research Review, 17, 50–62. *Heitink, M., Kleij, F., Veldkamp, B., Schildkamp, K., & Kippers, W. (2016). A systematic review of prerequisites for implementing assessment for learning in classroom practice. Educational Research Review, 17, 50–62.
go back to reference *Hounsell, D., Xu, R., & Tai, C. M. (2007). Integrative assessment: Balancing assessment of and assessment for learning—guide no. 2. Gloucester: The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. *Hounsell, D., Xu, R., & Tai, C. M. (2007). Integrative assessment: Balancing assessment of and assessment for learning—guide no. 2. Gloucester: The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.
go back to reference Hsu, C.-L., Zhao, Y., & Wang, W.-C. (2013). Exploiting computerized adaptive testing for self-directed learning. In M. M. C. Mok (Ed.), Self-directed learning oriented assessments in the Asia-Pacific (pp. 257–280). Dordrecht: Springer. Hsu, C.-L., Zhao, Y., & Wang, W.-C. (2013). Exploiting computerized adaptive testing for self-directed learning. In M. M. C. Mok (Ed.), Self-directed learning oriented assessments in the Asia-Pacific (pp. 257–280). Dordrecht: Springer.
go back to reference Huang, F. Q. (2003). On curriculum for learning: review from perspective of cultural philosophy. Peking University Education Review, 4(90–94), 99. Huang, F. Q. (2003). On curriculum for learning: review from perspective of cultural philosophy. Peking University Education Review, 4(90–94), 99.
go back to reference *Hume, A., & Coll, R. (2009). Assessment of learning, for learning, and as learning: New Zealand case studies. Assessment in Education, 16(3), 269–290. *Hume, A., & Coll, R. (2009). Assessment of learning, for learning, and as learning: New Zealand case studies. Assessment in Education, 16(3), 269–290.
go back to reference InPraxis Group Inc. (2006). Effective professional development: What the research says. Edmonton: Alberta Education. InPraxis Group Inc. (2006). Effective professional development: What the research says. Edmonton: Alberta Education.
go back to reference Istance, D., & Kools, M. (2013). OECD Work on technology and education: innovative learning environments as an integrating framework. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 43–57.CrossRef Istance, D., & Kools, M. (2013). OECD Work on technology and education: innovative learning environments as an integrating framework. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 43–57.CrossRef
go back to reference Järvelä, S., & Järvenojä, H. (2011). Socially constructed self-regulated learning and motivation regulation in collaborative learning groups. Teachers College Record, 113(2), 350–374. Järvelä, S., & Järvenojä, H. (2011). Socially constructed self-regulated learning and motivation regulation in collaborative learning groups. Teachers College Record, 113(2), 350–374.
go back to reference *Jones, N., & Saville, N. (2016). Learning oriented assessment—a systemic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. *Jones, N., & Saville, N. (2016). Learning oriented assessment—a systemic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference *Keppell, M., & Carless, D. (2006). Learning-oriented assessment: a technology-based case study. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 13(2), 179–191. *Keppell, M., & Carless, D. (2006). Learning-oriented assessment: a technology-based case study. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 13(2), 179–191.
go back to reference Kim, A., & Kim, H. (2017). The effectiveness of instructor feedback for learning-oriented language assessment: using an integrated reading-to-write task for English for academic purposes. Assessing Writing, 32, 57–71.CrossRef Kim, A., & Kim, H. (2017). The effectiveness of instructor feedback for learning-oriented language assessment: using an integrated reading-to-write task for English for academic purposes. Assessing Writing, 32, 57–71.CrossRef
go back to reference Kirschner, P. (2005). Learning in innovative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 547–554.CrossRef Kirschner, P. (2005). Learning in innovative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 547–554.CrossRef
go back to reference *Klenowski, V. (2006). Learning oriented assessment in the Asia Pacific region. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 13(2), 131–134. *Klenowski, V. (2006). Learning oriented assessment in the Asia Pacific region. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 13(2), 131–134.
go back to reference Klute, M., Apthorp, H., Harlacher, J., & Reale, M. (2017). Formative assessment and elementary school student academic achievement: A review of the evidence. REL 2017-259. Washington, DC: Regional Educational Laboratory Central. Klute, M., Apthorp, H., Harlacher, J., & Reale, M. (2017). Formative assessment and elementary school student academic achievement: A review of the evidence. REL 2017-259. Washington, DC: Regional Educational Laboratory Central.
go back to reference Knowles, M. (1975). Self-directed learning: a guild for learners and teachers. New York: Association Press. Knowles, M. (1975). Self-directed learning: a guild for learners and teachers. New York: Association Press.
go back to reference Koh, K. (2011). Improving teacher’ assessment literacy through professional development. Teaching Education, 22(3), 255–276.CrossRef Koh, K. (2011). Improving teacher’ assessment literacy through professional development. Teaching Education, 22(3), 255–276.CrossRef
go back to reference *Krogstrup, H. (1997). User participation in quality assessment: a dialogue and learning oriented evaluation method. Evaluation, 2(3), 205–224. *Krogstrup, H. (1997). User participation in quality assessment: a dialogue and learning oriented evaluation method. Evaluation, 2(3), 205–224.
go back to reference Li, Y., Dong, M., & Huang, R. (2009). Toward a semantic forum for active collaborative learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 71–86. Li, Y., Dong, M., & Huang, R. (2009). Toward a semantic forum for active collaborative learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 71–86.
go back to reference Lin, H., Wang, Y., Cai, J., & Li, C. (2014). Design and development of education cloud platform. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 6(3), 383–386. Lin, H., Wang, Y., Cai, J., & Li, C. (2014). Design and development of education cloud platform. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 6(3), 383–386.
go back to reference Loughran, J. (2015). Student teacher as researcher. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. L. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 1231–1258). Dordrecht: Springer. Loughran, J. (2015). Student teacher as researcher. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. L. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 1231–1258). Dordrecht: Springer.
go back to reference *Martinez, M., Lipson, J. (1989). Assessment for learning. Educational Leadership, 46(7), 73–75. *Martinez, M., Lipson, J. (1989). Assessment for learning. Educational Leadership, 46(7), 73–75.
go back to reference *Mclaren, S. (2012). Assessment is for learning: supporting feedback. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22(2), 227–245. *Mclaren, S. (2012). Assessment is for learning: supporting feedback. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22(2), 227–245.
go back to reference *Miedijensky, S., & Tal, T. (2016). Reflection and assessment for learning in science enrichment courses for the gifted. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 50, 1–13. *Miedijensky, S., & Tal, T. (2016). Reflection and assessment for learning in science enrichment courses for the gifted. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 50, 1–13.
go back to reference Miller, M. (2008). Problem-based conversations: using preservice teachers’ problems as a mechanism for their professional development. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(4), 77–98. Miller, M. (2008). Problem-based conversations: using preservice teachers’ problems as a mechanism for their professional development. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(4), 77–98.
go back to reference *Mok, M. M. C. (2010). Self-directed learning oriented assessment: assessment that informs learning and empowers the learner. Hong Kong: Pace Publications Ltd. *Mok, M. M. C. (2010). Self-directed learning oriented assessment: assessment that informs learning and empowers the learner. Hong Kong: Pace Publications Ltd.
go back to reference *Mok, M. M. C. (2013). Self-directed learning oriented assessments in the Asia-Pacific. London: Springer.CrossRef *Mok, M. M. C. (2013). Self-directed learning oriented assessments in the Asia-Pacific. London: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference Mysen, T. (2013). Towards a framework for controls as determinants of export performance. European Business Review, 25(3), 224–242.CrossRef Mysen, T. (2013). Towards a framework for controls as determinants of export performance. European Business Review, 25(3), 224–242.CrossRef
go back to reference Nelson, E., & Bishop, P. (2013). Students as action research partners: a New Zealand example. Middle School Journal, 45, 19–26.CrossRef Nelson, E., & Bishop, P. (2013). Students as action research partners: a New Zealand example. Middle School Journal, 45, 19–26.CrossRef
go back to reference Niess, M. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509–523.CrossRef Niess, M. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509–523.CrossRef
go back to reference OECD. (2010). The nature of learning: Using research to inspire practice. Paris: OECD. OECD. (2010). The nature of learning: Using research to inspire practice. Paris: OECD.
go back to reference Palmer, A., & Choi, N. (2014). The current state of library open source software research: a descriptive literature review and classification. Library Hi Tech, 32(1), 11–27.CrossRef Palmer, A., & Choi, N. (2014). The current state of library open source software research: a descriptive literature review and classification. Library Hi Tech, 32(1), 11–27.CrossRef
go back to reference *Pat-El, R., Tillema, H., Segers, M., & Vedder, P. (2013). Validation of assessment for learning questionnaires for teachers and students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 98–113. *Pat-El, R., Tillema, H., Segers, M., & Vedder, P. (2013). Validation of assessment for learning questionnaires for teachers and students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 98–113.
go back to reference *Plake, B., & Impara, J. (1996). Teacher assessment literacy: what do teachers know about assessment? In Phye G. D. (Ed.), Handbook of classroom assessment: learning, achievement, and adjustment (pp. 53–68). Cambridge: Academic Press.CrossRef *Plake, B., & Impara, J. (1996). Teacher assessment literacy: what do teachers know about assessment? In Phye G. D. (Ed.), Handbook of classroom assessment: learning, achievement, and adjustment (pp. 53–68). Cambridge: Academic Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Punch, S. (2002). Research with children: the same or different from research with adults? Childhood, 9(3), 321–341. Punch, S. (2002). Research with children: the same or different from research with adults? Childhood, 9(3), 321–341.
go back to reference Redecker, C., & Johannessen, Ø. (2013). Changing assessment—towards a new assessment paradigm using ICT. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 79–96.CrossRef Redecker, C., & Johannessen, Ø. (2013). Changing assessment—towards a new assessment paradigm using ICT. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 79–96.CrossRef
go back to reference Regalla, M., & Peker, H. (2017). Prompting all students to learn: examining dynamic assessment of special needs and typical students in a Prekindergarten Inclusive French Program. Foreign Language Annals, 50(2), 323–338.CrossRef Regalla, M., & Peker, H. (2017). Prompting all students to learn: examining dynamic assessment of special needs and typical students in a Prekindergarten Inclusive French Program. Foreign Language Annals, 50(2), 323–338.CrossRef
go back to reference Rovegno, I. (1992). Learning to teach in a field-based methods course: the development of pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8(1), 69–82.CrossRef Rovegno, I. (1992). Learning to teach in a field-based methods course: the development of pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8(1), 69–82.CrossRef
go back to reference Rushmer, R., Kelly, D., Lough, M., Wilkinson, J., & Davies, H. (2004a). Introducing the learning practice—I. The characteristics of learning organizations in primary care. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 10(3), 375–386.CrossRef Rushmer, R., Kelly, D., Lough, M., Wilkinson, J., & Davies, H. (2004a). Introducing the learning practice—I. The characteristics of learning organizations in primary care. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 10(3), 375–386.CrossRef
go back to reference Rushmer, R., Kelly, D., Lough, M., Wilkinson, J., & Davies, H. (2004b). Introducing the learning practice—II. Becoming a learning practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 10(3), 387–398.CrossRef Rushmer, R., Kelly, D., Lough, M., Wilkinson, J., & Davies, H. (2004b). Introducing the learning practice—II. Becoming a learning practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 10(3), 387–398.CrossRef
go back to reference Schuitema, J., Peetsma, T., & van der Veen, I. (2012). Self-regulated learning and students' perceptions of innovative and traditional learning environments: a longitudinal study in secondary education. Educational Studies, 38(4), 397–413.CrossRef Schuitema, J., Peetsma, T., & van der Veen, I. (2012). Self-regulated learning and students' perceptions of innovative and traditional learning environments: a longitudinal study in secondary education. Educational Studies, 38(4), 397–413.CrossRef
go back to reference Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler et al. (Eds.), Perspectives in evaluation, American Educational Research Association Monograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation (pp. 39–83). Chicago: Rand McNally. Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler et al. (Eds.), Perspectives in evaluation, American Educational Research Association Monograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation (pp. 39–83). Chicago: Rand McNally.
go back to reference Shen, R. H., & Huang, F. Q. (2004). A preliminary study of cooperative-activity-based learning. Educational Research, 297, 60–63. Shen, R. H., & Huang, F. Q. (2004). A preliminary study of cooperative-activity-based learning. Educational Research, 297, 60–63.
go back to reference Shi, Y., Frederiksen, C., & Muis, K. (2013). A cross-cultural study of self-regulated learning in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Learning and Instruction, 23, 52–59.CrossRef Shi, Y., Frederiksen, C., & Muis, K. (2013). A cross-cultural study of self-regulated learning in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Learning and Instruction, 23, 52–59.CrossRef
go back to reference Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.CrossRef Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.CrossRef
go back to reference Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Education Review, 57(1), 1–8.CrossRef Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Education Review, 57(1), 1–8.CrossRef
go back to reference Simms, M., & George, B. (2014). Approaching assessment from a learning perspective: elevating assessment beyond technique. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26, 95–104.CrossRef Simms, M., & George, B. (2014). Approaching assessment from a learning perspective: elevating assessment beyond technique. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26, 95–104.CrossRef
go back to reference Singh, C. K. S., Lebar, O., & Kepol, N. (2017). An observation of classroom assessment practices among lecturers in selected Malaysian higher learning institutions. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 14(1), 23–61. Singh, C. K. S., Lebar, O., & Kepol, N. (2017). An observation of classroom assessment practices among lecturers in selected Malaysian higher learning institutions. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 14(1), 23–61.
go back to reference Smith, C., Worsfold, K., Davies, L., Fisher, R., & McPhail, R. (2013). Assessment literacy and student learning: the case for explicitly developing students ‘assessment literacy’. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(1), 44–60.CrossRef Smith, C., Worsfold, K., Davies, L., Fisher, R., & McPhail, R. (2013). Assessment literacy and student learning: the case for explicitly developing students ‘assessment literacy’. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(1), 44–60.CrossRef
go back to reference Soni, G., & Kodali, R. (2012). A critical review of empirical research methodology in supply chain management. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 23(6), 753–779.CrossRef Soni, G., & Kodali, R. (2012). A critical review of empirical research methodology in supply chain management. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 23(6), 753–779.CrossRef
go back to reference Stiggins, R. (1991). Assessment literacy. Phi Delta Kappan, 72, 534–539. Stiggins, R. (1991). Assessment literacy. Phi Delta Kappan, 72, 534–539.
go back to reference *Stiggins, R. (2005a). From formative assessment to assessment for learning: a path to success in standards-based schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(4), 324–328. *Stiggins, R. (2005a). From formative assessment to assessment for learning: a path to success in standards-based schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(4), 324–328.
go back to reference *Stiggins, R. (2005b). Student-involved assessment for learning. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall. *Stiggins, R. (2005b). Student-involved assessment for learning. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
go back to reference *Stiggins, R. (2009). Assessment for learning in upper elementary grades. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(6), 419–421. *Stiggins, R. (2009). Assessment for learning in upper elementary grades. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(6), 419–421.
go back to reference Stödberg, U. (2012). A research review of e-assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(5), 591–604.CrossRef Stödberg, U. (2012). A research review of e-assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(5), 591–604.CrossRef
go back to reference *Tang, S., & Chow, A. (2007). Communicating feedback in teaching practice supervision in a learning-oriented field experience assessment framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(7), 1066–1085. *Tang, S., & Chow, A. (2007). Communicating feedback in teaching practice supervision in a learning-oriented field experience assessment framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(7), 1066–1085.
go back to reference Tanner, D. (2001). Authentic assessment: a solution, or part of the problem? The High School Journal, 85(1), 24–29.CrossRef Tanner, D. (2001). Authentic assessment: a solution, or part of the problem? The High School Journal, 85(1), 24–29.CrossRef
go back to reference *Taras, M. (2005). Assessment—summative and formative: some theoretical reflections. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53(4), 466–478. *Taras, M. (2005). Assessment—summative and formative: some theoretical reflections. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53(4), 466–478.
go back to reference *Taras, M. (2008). Assessment for learning: sectarian divisions of terminology and concepts. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 32(4), 389–397. *Taras, M. (2008). Assessment for learning: sectarian divisions of terminology and concepts. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 32(4), 389–397.
go back to reference Taylor, E. (2007). An update of transformative learning theory: a critical review of the empirical research (1999–2005). International Journal of Lifelong Education, 26(2), 173–191.CrossRef Taylor, E. (2007). An update of transformative learning theory: a critical review of the empirical research (1999–2005). International Journal of Lifelong Education, 26(2), 173–191.CrossRef
go back to reference Teasdale, R., Viskupic, K., Bartley, J., McConnell, D., Manduca, C., Bruckner, M., Farthing, D., & Iverson, E. (2017). A multidimensional assessment of reformed teaching practice in geoscience classrooms. Geosphere, 13(2), 608–627.CrossRef Teasdale, R., Viskupic, K., Bartley, J., McConnell, D., Manduca, C., Bruckner, M., Farthing, D., & Iverson, E. (2017). A multidimensional assessment of reformed teaching practice in geoscience classrooms. Geosphere, 13(2), 608–627.CrossRef
go back to reference Terpstra, D., & Rozell, E. (1997). Why some potentially effective staffing practices are seldom used. Public Personnel Management, 26(4), 483–495.CrossRef Terpstra, D., & Rozell, E. (1997). Why some potentially effective staffing practices are seldom used. Public Personnel Management, 26(4), 483–495.CrossRef
go back to reference *Tillema, H., Leenknecht, M., & Segers, M. (2011). Assessing assessment quality: criteria for quality assurance in design of (peer) assessment for learning: a review of research studies. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 25–34. *Tillema, H., Leenknecht, M., & Segers, M. (2011). Assessing assessment quality: criteria for quality assurance in design of (peer) assessment for learning: a review of research studies. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 25–34.
go back to reference Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (2001). Developing formative assessment in the classroom: using action research to explore and modify theory. British Educational Research Journal, 26(5), 615–631.CrossRef Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (2001). Developing formative assessment in the classroom: using action research to explore and modify theory. British Educational Research Journal, 26(5), 615–631.CrossRef
go back to reference Tough, A. (1967). Learning without a teacher: a study of tasks and assistance during adult self-teaching projects. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education. Tough, A. (1967). Learning without a teacher: a study of tasks and assistance during adult self-teaching projects. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
go back to reference Vallberg Roth, A.-C. (2014). Bedömning i förskolans dokumentationspraktiker: Fenomen, begrepp och reglering. Göteborgs universitet, Institutionen för pedagogik och didaktik, 19(4–5), 403–437. Vallberg Roth, A.-C. (2014). Bedömning i förskolans dokumentationspraktiker: Fenomen, begrepp och reglering. Göteborgs universitet, Institutionen för pedagogik och didaktik, 19(4–5), 403–437.
go back to reference Van Driel, J., Veal, W., & Janssen, F. (2001). Pedagogical content knowledge: an integrative component within the knowledge base for teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(8), 979–986.CrossRef Van Driel, J., Veal, W., & Janssen, F. (2001). Pedagogical content knowledge: an integrative component within the knowledge base for teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(8), 979–986.CrossRef
go back to reference *Volante, L. (2010). Assessment of, for, and as learning within schools: implications for transforming classroom practice. Action in Teacher Education, 31(4), 66–75. *Volante, L. (2010). Assessment of, for, and as learning within schools: implications for transforming classroom practice. Action in Teacher Education, 31(4), 66–75.
go back to reference *Volante, L., & Fazio, X. (2007). Exploring teacher candidates’ assessment literacy: implications for teacher education reform and professional development. Canadian Journal of Education, 30(3), 749–770. *Volante, L., & Fazio, X. (2007). Exploring teacher candidates’ assessment literacy: implications for teacher education reform and professional development. Canadian Journal of Education, 30(3), 749–770.
go back to reference Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109–121.CrossRef Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109–121.CrossRef
go back to reference Wang, T.-H., Wang, K.-H., & Huang, S.-C. (2008). Designing a web-based assessment environment for improving pre-service teacher assessment literacy. Computers and Education, 51(1), 448–462.CrossRef Wang, T.-H., Wang, K.-H., & Huang, S.-C. (2008). Designing a web-based assessment environment for improving pre-service teacher assessment literacy. Computers and Education, 51(1), 448–462.CrossRef
go back to reference *Webb, M., & Jones, J. (2009). Exploring tensions in developing assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 16(2), 165–184. *Webb, M., & Jones, J. (2009). Exploring tensions in developing assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 16(2), 165–184.
go back to reference Westbury, I., Hopmann, S., & Riquarts, K. (2000). Teaching as a reflective practice: The German didaktik tradition. London: Routledge. Westbury, I., Hopmann, S., & Riquarts, K. (2000). Teaching as a reflective practice: The German didaktik tradition. London: Routledge.
go back to reference *Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3–14. *Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3–14.
go back to reference Wilmott, D., & Knox, I. (2012). A review of cloud application assessment practices. Education for Information, 29, 229–242.CrossRef Wilmott, D., & Knox, I. (2012). A review of cloud application assessment practices. Education for Information, 29, 229–242.CrossRef
go back to reference *Winter, J. (2003). The changing prepositions of assessment practice: assessment of, for and as learning. British Educational Research Journal, 29(5), 767–772. *Winter, J. (2003). The changing prepositions of assessment practice: assessment of, for and as learning. British Educational Research Journal, 29(5), 767–772.
go back to reference Yang, H., & Tate, M. (2012). A descriptive literature review and classification of cloud computing research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 31, 35–60. Yang, H., & Tate, M. (2012). A descriptive literature review and classification of cloud computing research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 31, 35–60.
go back to reference Youssefa, A., El-Telbanya, M., & Zekry, A. (2017). The role of artificial intelligence in photo-voltaic systems design and control: a review. Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78, 72–79.CrossRef Youssefa, A., El-Telbanya, M., & Zekry, A. (2017). The role of artificial intelligence in photo-voltaic systems design and control: a review. Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78, 72–79.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Towards a learning-oriented assessment to improve students’ learning—a critical review of literature
Authors
Wenjie Zeng
Fuquan Huang
Lu Yu
Siyu Chen
Publication date
23-07-2018
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1874-8597
Electronic ISSN: 1874-8600
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-018-9281-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 3/2018 Go to the issue