Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Basic Metabolism Surrounding DNAs Read chapter Read first chapter

2013 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

16. Tree and Network Building

Author : Naruya Saitou

Published in: Introduction to Evolutionary Genomics

Publisher: Springer London

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Construction of phylogenetic trees from nucleotide or amino acid sequence data is one of the important areas of evolutionary genomics. We start from classification of tree-building methods, both by type of data and by type of tree search algorithm. Various distance matrix methods including UPGMA, minimum deviation methods, minimum evolution methods, transformed distance methods, and neighbor-joining method are explained. Among character-state methods, maximum parsimony methods, maximum likelihood methods, and Bayesian method are explained. These many phylogenetic tree-making methods were compared mainly based on computer simulation studies. Phylogenetic network constructions from distance matrix and from multiply aligned sequences are also discussed as well as phylogeny construction without multiple alignments.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter Evolutionary Distances
next chapter Population Genomics
Literature
1.
Saitou, N., & Nei, M. (1987). The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 4, 406–425.
2.
Ohtsuka, H., Oyanagi, M., Mafune, Y., Miyashita, N., Shiroishi, T., Moriwaki, K., Kominami, R., & Saitou, N. (1996). The presence/absence polymorphism and evolution of p53 pseudogene within the genus Mus. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 5, 548–556.CrossRef
3.
Kimura, M. (1980). A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 16, 111–120.CrossRef
4.
Saitou, N. (1996). Reconstruction of gene trees from sequence data. In R. Doolittle (Ed.), Methods in enzymology, 266: Computer methods for macromolecular sequence analysis (pp. 427–449). San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRef
5.
Saitou, N. (2007). Genomu Shinkagaku Nyumon. Tokyo: Kyoritsu-Shuppan (in Japanese).
6.
Saitou, N., & Imanishi, T. (1989). Relative efficiencies of the Fitch-Margoliash, maximum-parsimony, maximum-likelihood, minimum-evolution, and neighbor-joining methods of phylogenetic tree construction in obtaining the correct tree. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 6, 514–525.
7.
Saitou, N., & Nei, M. (1986). The number of nucleotides required to determine the branching order of three species, with special reference to the human-chimpanzee-gorilla divergence. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 24, 189–204.CrossRef
8.
Tamura, K., Nei, M., & Kumar, S. (2004). Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, USA, 101, 11030–11035.CrossRef
9.
Sneath, P. H. P., & Sokal, R. (1973). Numerical taxonomy. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.MATH
10.
Sokal, R., & Sneath, P. H. P. (1968) Principles of numerical taxonomy.
11.
Sokal, R., & Michener, C. D. (1958). A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationship. University of Kansas Science Bulletin, 38, 1409–1438.
12.
Nei, M. (1975). Molecular population genetics and evolution. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
13.
Chakraborty, R. (1977). Estimation of the time of divergence from phylogenetic studies. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology, 19, 217–223.
14.
Fitch, W. M., & Margoliash, E. (1967). Construction of phylogenetic trees. Science, 155, 279–284.CrossRef
15.
Tateno, Y., Nei, M., & Tajima, F. (1982). Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. I. Distantly related species. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 18, 387–404.CrossRef
16.
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., & Edwards, A. W. F. (1967). Phylogenetic analysis: Models and estimation procedures. American Journal of Human Genetics, 19, 233–257.
17.
Rzhetsky, A., & Nei, M. (1992). Statistical properties of the ordinary least-squares, generalized least-squares, and minimum-evolution methods of phylogenetic inference. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 35, 367–375.CrossRef
18.
Edwards, A. W. F., & Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. (1964). A method for cluster analysis. Biometrics, 21, 362–375.CrossRef
19.
Courant, R., Robbins, H., & Stewart, I. (1996). What is mathematics? Second edition: Oxford University Press.
20.
Rzhetsky, A., & Nei, M. (1992). A simple method for estimating and testing minimum-evolution trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 9, 945–967.
21.
22.
Nei, M., Kumar, S., & Takahashi, K. (1998). The optimization principle in phylogenetic analysis tends to give incorrect topologies when the number of nucleotides or amino acids used is small. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, USA, 95, 12390–12397.CrossRef
23.
Pauplin, Y. (2000). Direct calculation of a tree length using a distance matrix. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 51, 41–47.
24.
25.
Gascuel, O., & Steel, M. (2006). Neighbor-joining revealed. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 23, 1997–2000.CrossRef
26.
Mihaescu, R., & Pachter, L. (2008). Combinatorics of least-squares trees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 13206–13211.MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
27.
Price, M., Dehal, P. S., & Arkin, A. P. (2009). FastTree: Computing large minimum evolution trees with profiles instead of a distance matrix. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 26, 1641–1650.CrossRef
28.
Farris, J. S. (1972). Estimating phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. American Naturalist, 106, 645–668.CrossRef
29.
Faith, D. P. (1985). Distance methods and the approximation of most-parsimonious trees. Systematic Zoology, 34, 312–325.CrossRef
30.
Farris, J. S., Kluge, A. G., & Exkardt, M. J. (1970). A numerical approach to phylogenetic systematics. Systematic Zoology, 19, 172–191.CrossRef
31.
Klotz, L. C., & Blanken, R. L. (1981). A practical method for calculating evolutionary trees from sequence data. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 91, 261–272.CrossRef
32.
Li, W.-H. (1981). Simple method for constructing phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, USA, 78, 1085–1089.MATHCrossRef
33.
OOta, S. (1998). ThreeTree: A new method to reconstruct phylogenetic trees. Genome Informatics, 9, 340–341.
34.
35.
Buneman, P. (1971). The recovery of trees from measurements of dissimilarity. In F. R. Hodson, D. G. Kendall, & P. Tautu (Eds.), Mathematics in the archeological and historical sciences (pp. 387–395). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
36.
Fitch, W. M. (1981). A non-sequential method for constructing trees and hierarchical classifications. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 18, 30–37.CrossRef
37.
Sattath, S., & Tversky, A. (1977). Additive similarity trees. Psychometrika, 42, 319–345.CrossRef
38.
Saitou N. (1986). Theoretical studies on the methods of reconstructing phylogenetic trees from DNA sequence data. Ph.D. dissertation. Graduate University of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.
39.
Studier, J. A., & Keppler, K. J. (1988). A note on the neighbor-joining algorithm of Saitou and Nei. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 5, 729–731.
40.
Ishida, N., Oyunsuren, T., Mashima, S., Mukoyama, H., & Saitou, N. (1995). Mitochondrial DNA sequences of various species of the genus Equus with a special reference to the phylogenetic relationship between Przewalskii’s wild horse and domestic horse. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 41, 180–188.CrossRef
41.
Gascuel, O. (1997). BIONJ: an improved version of the NJ algorithm based on a simple model of sequence data. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 14, 685–695.CrossRef
42.
Bruno, W. J., Socci, N. D., & Halpern, A. L. (2000). Weighted neighbor joining: A likelihood-based approach to distance-based phylogeny reconstruction. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 17, 189–197.CrossRef
43.
Kumar, S. (1996). A stepwise algorithm for finding minimum evolution trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 13, 584–593.CrossRef
44.
Pearson, W. R., Robins, G., & Zhang, T. (1999). Generalized neighbor-joining: More reliable phylogenetic tree reconstruction. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 16, 806–816.CrossRef
45.
Dress, A. (1984). Trees, tight extensions of metric spaces, and the cohomological dimension of certain groups: A note on combinatorial properties of metric spaces. Advances in Mathematics, 53, 321–402.MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
46.
Dress, A., Huber, K. H., Koolen, J., Moulton, V., & Spillner, A. (2012). Basic phylogenetic combinatorics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
Bandelt, H. J., & Dress, A. W. (1992). Split decomposition: A new and useful approach to phylogenetic analysis of distance data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 1, 242–252.CrossRef
48.
Kitano, T., Noda, R., Takenaka, O., & Saitou, N. (2009). Relic of ancient recombinations in gibbon ABO blood group genes deciphered through phylogenetic network analysis. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 51, 465–471.CrossRef
49.
Bryant, D., & Moulton, V. (2004). Neighbor-Net: An agglomerative method for the construction of phylogenetic networks. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 21, 255–265.CrossRef
50.
Huson, D. H., & Bryant, D. (2006). Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 23, 254–267.CrossRef
51.
Camin, J. H., & Sokal, R. R. (1965). A method for deducing branching sequences in phylogeny. Evolution, 19, 311–326.CrossRef
52.
Eck, R. V., & Dayhoff, M. (1966). Atlas of protein sequence and structure. Silver Spring: National Biomedical Research Foundation.
53.
Felsenstein, J. (2004). Inferring phylogenies. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
54.
Fitch, W. M. (1977). On the problem of discovering the most parsimonious tree. American Naturalist, 111, 223–257.CrossRef
55.
Hartigan, J. A. (1973). Minimum mutation fits to a given tree. Biometrics, 29, 53–65.CrossRef
56.
Zharkikh, A. A. (1977). Algorithm for constructing phylogenetic trees from amino acid sequences. In V. A. Ratner (Ed.), Mathematical models of evolution and selection (pp. 5–52). Novosibirsk: Institute of Cytology and Genetics (in Russian).
57.
Zharkikh, A. A., & Ratner, V. A. (1996). Methods for studying the evolution of macromolecules. In V. A. Ratner et al. (Eds.), Molecular evolution (pp. 71–91). Berlin/New York: Springer-Verlag.
58.
Saitou, N. (1998). Simultaneous sequence joining (SSJ): A new method for reconstruction of phylogenetic networks of closely related sequences (Abstract). Anthropological Science, 106, 141–142.
59.
Tateno, Y. (1990). A method for molecular phylogeny construction by direct use of nucleotide sequence data. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 30, 85–93.CrossRef
60.
Wilson, A. O. (1965). A consistency test for phylogenies based on contemporaneous species. Systematic Zoology, 14, 214–220.CrossRef
61.
Le Quesne, W. J. (1969). A method of selection of characters in numerical taxonomy. Systematic Zoology, 18, 201–205.CrossRef
62.
Saitou, N. (1989). A theoretical study of the underestimation of branch lengths by the maximum parsimony principle. Systematic Zoology, 38, 1–5.CrossRef
63.
Felsenstein, J. (1978). Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Systematic Zoology, 27, 401–410.CrossRef
64.
Zharkikh, A., & Li, W.-H. (1993). Inconsistency of the maximum parsimony method: The case of five taxa with a molecular clock. Systematic Biology, 42, 113–125.
65.
Takezaki, N., & Nei, M. (1994). Inconsistency of the maximum parsimony method when the rate of nucleotide substitution is constant. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 39, 210–218.
66.
Tamura, K., & Nei, M. (1993). Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 10, 512–526.
67.
Saitou, N., & Ueda, S. (1994). Evolutionary rate of insertions and deletions in non-coding nucleotide sequences of primates. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 11, 504–512.
68.
Bernstein, F. (1925). Zusammenfassende betrachtungen uber die erblichen blutstrukturen des menschen. Molecular and General Genetics, 37, 237–370.
69.
Yasuda, N., & Kimura, M. (1968). A gene-counting method of maximum likelihood for estimating gene frequencies in ABO and ABO-like systems. Annals of Human Genetics, 31, 409–420.CrossRef
70.
Neyman, J. (1971). Molecular studies of evolution: A source of novel statistical problems. In S. S. Gupta & J. Yackel (Eds.), Statistical decision theory and related topics (pp. 1–27). New York: Academic Press.
71.
Felsenstein, J. (1973). Maximum-likelihood estimation of evolutionary trees from continuous characters. American Journal of Human Genetics, 25, 471–492.
72.
Felsenstein, J. (1973). Maximum-likelihood and minimum-steps methods for estimating evolutionary trees from data on discrete characters. Systematic Zoology, 22, 240–249.CrossRef
73.
Kashap, R. L., & Subas, S. (1974). Statistical estimation of parameters in a phylogenetic tree using a dynamic model of the substitutional process. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 47, 75–101.CrossRef
74.
Langley, C., & Fitch, W. M. (1974). An examination of the constancy of the rate of molecular evolution. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 3, 161–177.CrossRef
75.
Thompson, E. A. (1975). Human evolutionary trees. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
76.
Felsenstein, J. (1981). Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 17, 368–376.CrossRef
77.
Guindon, S., Dufayard, J. F., Lefort, V., Anisimova, M., Hordijk, W., & Gascuel, O. (2010). New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: Assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic Biology, 59, 307–321.CrossRef
78.
Saitou, N. (1988). Property and efficiency of the maximum likelihood method for molecular phylogeny. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 27, 261–273.CrossRef
79.
Saitou, N. (1990). Maximum likelihood methods. Methods in Enzymology, 183, 584–598.
80.
Hixson, J., & Brown, W. M. (1986). A comparison of the small ribosomal RNA genes from the mitochondrial DNA of the great apes and humans: Sequence, structure, evolution, and phylogenetic implications. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 3, 1–18.
81.
Gouy, M., Guindon, S., & Gascuel, O. (2010). SeaView version 4: A multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 27, 221–224.CrossRef
82.
Horai, S., Hayasaka, K., Kondo, R., Tsugane, K., & Takahata, N. (1995). Recent African origin of modern humans revealed by complete sequences of hominoid mitochondrial DNAs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 92, 532–536.CrossRef
83.
Adachi, J., & Hasegawa, M. (1996). MOLPHY version 2.3: Programs for molecular phylogenetics based on maximum likelihood. Computer Science Monographs, 28, 1–150.
84.
Yang, Z. (1997). PAML: A program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. CABIOS Applications Note, 13, 555–556.
85.
Strimmer, K., & von Haeseler, A. (1996). Quartet puzzling: A quartet maximum-likelihood method for constructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 13, 1401–1409.CrossRef
86.
Ota, S., & Li, W.-H. (2000). NJML: A hybrid algorithm for the neighbor-joining and maximum-likelihood methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 17, 1401–1409.CrossRef
87.
Ota, S., & Li, W.-H. (2001). NJML+: An extension of the NJML method to handle protein sequence data and computer software implementation. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 18, 1983–1992.CrossRef
88.
Yule, G. U. (1924). A mathematical theory of evolution, based on the conclusions of Dr. J. C. Willis, F.R.S (Philosophical transaction of royal society of London, series B, Vol. 213, pp. 21–87). London: Harrison and Sons.
89.
Rannala, B., & Yang, Z. (1996). Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: A new method of phylogenetic inference. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 17, 368–376.
90.
Huelsenbeck, J. P., Ronquist, F., Nielsen, R., & Bollback, J. P. (2001). Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science, 294, 2310–2314.CrossRef
91.
Nei, M. (1987). Molecular evolutionary genetics. New York: Columbia University Press.
92.
Li, W.-H., & Guoy, M. (1991). Statistical methods for testing molecular phylogenies. In M. M. Miyamoto & J. Cracraft (Eds.), Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences (pp. 249–277). New York: Oxford University Press.
93.
Yang, Z. H. (1996). Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and likelihood methods. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 42, 294–307.CrossRef
94.
Felsenstein, J. (1984). The statistical approach to inferring evolutionary trees and what it tells us about parsimony and compatibility. In T. Duncan & T. F. Steussy (Eds.), Cladistics: Perspectives on the reconstruction of evolutionary history (pp. 169–191). New York: Columbia University Press.
95.
Bandelt, H. J., Forster, P., & Rohl, A. (1999). Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 16, 37–48.CrossRef
96.
Kruskal, J. B. (1956). On the shortest spanning subtree of the graph and the travelling salesman problem. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 7, 48–57.MATHMathSciNetCrossRef
97.
FarrisJ, S. (1970). Methods for computing Wagner trees. Systematic Zoology, 19, 83–92.CrossRef
98.
Jinam, T. A., Hong, L. -C., Phipps, M. E., Stoneking, M., Ameen, M., Edo, J., HUGO Pan-Asian SNP Consortium, & Saitou, N. (2012). Evolutionary history of Continental Southeast Asians: “Early train” hypothesis based on genetic analysis of mitochondrial and autosomal DNA data. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 29, 3513–3527.
99.
Kryukov, K., & Saitou, N. (2003). Netview: Application software for constructing and visually exploring phylogenetic networks. Genome Informatics, 14, 280–281.
100.
Grunewald, S., Farslund, K., Dress, A., & Moulton, V. (2007). QNet: An agglomerative method for the construction of phylogenetic networks from weighted quartets. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 24, 532–538.CrossRef
101.
Wooley, S., Posada, D., & Crandall, K. A. (2007). A comparison of phylogenetic network methods using computer simulation. PLoS One, 3, e1913.CrossRef
102.
Takahashi, K., & Nei, M. (2000). Efficiencies of fast algorithms of phylogenetic inference under the criteria of maximum parsimony, minimum evolution, and maximum likelihood when a large number of sequences are used. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 17, 1251–1258.CrossRef
103.
DeBry, R. W. (1992). The consistency of several phylogeny-inference methods under varying evolutionary rates. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 9, 537–551.
104.
Nei, M., Tajima, F., & Tateno, Y. (1983). Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. II. Gene frequency data. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 19, 153–170.CrossRef
105.
Tateno, Y., Takezaki, N., & Nei, M. (1994). Relative efficiencies of the maximum likelihood, neighbor-joining, and maximum parsimony methods when substitution rate varies with site. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 11, 261–277.
106.
Kuhner, M. K., & Felsenstein, J. (1994). A simulation comparison of phylogeny algorithms under equal and unequal evolutionary rates. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 11, 459–468. Erratum in: Molecular Biology and Evolution, 12, p. 525.
107.
Nei, M., Kumar, S., & Takahashi, K. (1998). The optimization principle in phylogenetic analysis tends to give incorrect topologies when the number of nucleotides or amino acids used is small. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 12390–12397.CrossRef
108.
Russo, C., Takezaki, N., & Nei, M. (1996). Efficiencies of different genes and different tree-making methods in recovering a known vertebrate phylogeny. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 13, 525–536.CrossRef
109.
Nguyen, M. A. H., Klaere, S., & von Haeseler, A. (2011). MISFITS: Evaluating the goodness of fit between a phylogenetic model and an alignment. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 28, 143–152.CrossRef
110.
Nguyen, M. A. H., Gesell, T., & von Haeseler, A. (2012). ImOSM: Intermittent evolution and robustness of phylogenetic methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 29, 663–673.CrossRef
111.
Karlin, S., & Ladunga, I. (1994). Comparisons of eukaryotic genomic sequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 91, 12832–12836.CrossRef
112.
Nakashima, H., Nishikawa, K., & Ooi, T. (1997). Differences in dinucleotide frequencies of human, yeast, and Escherichia coli genes. DNA Research, 4, 185–192.CrossRef
113.
Karlin, S., Mrazek, J., & Campbell, A. (1997). Compositional biases of bacterial genomes and evolutionary implications. Journal of Bacteriology, 179, 3899–3913.
114.
Abe, T., et al. (2003). Informatics for unveiling hidden genome signatures. Genome Research, 13, 693–702.CrossRef
115.
Pride, D. T., Meinersmann, R. J., Wassenaar, T. M., & Blaser, M. J. (2003). Evolutionary implications of microbial genome tetranucleotide frequency biases. Genome Research, 13, 145–155.CrossRef
116.
Takahashi, M., Kryukov, K., & Saitou, N. (2009). Estimation of bacterial species phylogeny through oligonucleotide frequency distances. Genomics, 93, 525–533.CrossRef
117.
Felsenstein, J. (1985). Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 39, 783–791.
Metadata
Title
Tree and Network Building
Author
Naruya Saitou
Copyright Year
2013
Publisher
Springer London
Book
Introduction to Evolutionary Genomics

Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5303-0

Electronic ISBN: 978-1-4471-5304-7

Copyright Year: 2013

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5304-7_16

Premium Partner

    Image Credits