Top

Wireless Networks

Published in:

09-04-2016

Two-step fuzzy logic system to achieve energy efficiency and prolonging the lifetime of WSNs

Authors: Yahya Kord Tamandani, Mohammad Ubaidullah Bokhari, Qahtan Makki Shallal

Published in: Wireless Networks | Issue 6/2017

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Mainly because of resource restrictions in wireless sensor networks (WSNs), extending the lifetime of the network, has gained significant attention in the last several years. As energy becomes a quite challenging issue in these networks, clustering protocols are employed to deal with this problem. One of the main research areas in cluster-based routing protocols is fair distribution and balancing the overall energy consumption in the WSN, by selecting the most suitable cluster heads (CHs). In order to reduce the energy consumption and enhancing the CHs selection process a new routing protocol based on fuzzy logic has been proposed. There exist several algorithms based of fuzzy logic to select the most proper CHs for the network. But these algorithms do not consider all the important parameters and information of the sensor nodes in order to guarantee the optimal selection of the CHs. In The proposed algorithm, a two-step fuzzy logic system is used to select the appropriate CHs. The selection of CHs is based on six descriptors; residual energy, density, distance to base station, vulnerability index, centrality and distance between CHs. The result of the simulation indicates that, the proposed algorithm performs better comparing with some other similar approaches in case of fair distribution and balancing of the overall energy consumption.

previous article Potential position node placement approach via oppositional gravitational search for fulfill coverage and connectivity in target based wireless sensor networks

next article Privacy-preserving authenticated key agreement scheme based on biometrics for session initiation protocol

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Arampatzis, T., et al. (2005). A survey of applications of wireless sensors and wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control, 2005, Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (pp. 719–724), 27–29 June 2005.

Qin, Y., et al. (2016). When things matter: A survey on data-centric internet of things. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 64(2016), 137–153.CrossRef

Gubbi, J., et al. (2013). Internet of things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(7), 1645–1660.CrossRef

Sheng, Z., et al. (2013). A survey on the ietf protocol suite for the internet of things: Standards, challenges, and opportunities. IEEE Wireless Communications, 20(6), 91–98.CrossRef

Jing, Q., et al. (2014). Security of the internet of things: Perspectives and challenges. Wireless Networks, 20(8), 2481–2501.CrossRef

Whitmore, A., et al. (2015). The internet of things—A survey of topics and trends. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(2), 261–274.CrossRef

Yan, Z., et al. (2014). A survey on trust management for internet of things. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 42(2014), 120–134.CrossRef

Li, M., et al. (2013). A survey on topology control in wireless sensor networks: Taxonomy, comparative study, and open issues. Proceedings of the IEEE, 101(12), 2538–2557. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2013.2257631.CrossRef

Zhang, X. M., et al. (2015). Interference-based topology control algorithm for delay-constrained mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 14(4), 742–754. doi:10.1109/TMC.2014.2331966.MathSciNetCrossRef

10.

Zhu, N., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2015). A generic framework for energy evaluation on wireless sensor networks. Wireless Networks. doi:10.1007/s11276-015-1033-x.

11.

Tamandani, Y. K., & Bokhari, M. U. (2015). The impact of sink location on the performance, throughput and energy efficiency of the WSNs. In 2015 4th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (ICRITO) (Trends and Future Directions), Noida (pp. 1–5). doi:10.1109/ICRITO.2015.7359244.

12.

Yao, Y., et al. (2015). EDAL: An energy-efficient, delay-aware, and lifetime-balancing data collection protocol for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 23(3), 810–823.CrossRef

13.

Chilamkurti, N., et al. (2009). Cross-layer support for energy efficient routing in wireless sensor networks. Journal of Sensors. Article ID 134165. doi:10.1155/2009/134165.

14.

Liu, Y., et al. (2010). Multi-layer clustering routing algorithm for wireless vehicular sensor networks. IET Communications, 4(7), 810–816. doi:10.1049/iet-com.2009.0164.CrossRef

15.

Li, P., et al. (2014). Reliable multicast with pipelined network coding using opportunistic feeding and routing. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 25(12), 3264–3273. doi:10.1109/TPDS.2013.2297105.CrossRef

16.

Saleem, M., et al. (2012). BeeSensor: An energy-efficient and scalable routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. Information Sciences, 200, 38–56.CrossRef

17.

Bhuiyan, M. Z. A., et al. (2015). Local area prediction-based mobile target tracking in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 64(7), 1968–1982. doi:10.1109/TC.2014.2346209.MathSciNetCrossRefMATH

18.

Tamandani, Y. K., & Bokhari, M. U. (2016). SEPFL routing protocol based on fuzzy logic control to extend the lifetime and throughput of the wireless sensor network. Wireless Networks, 22(2), 647–653.CrossRef

19.

Heinzelman, W., et al. (2000). Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2000. IEEE.

20.

Xiao, Y., et al. (2012). Tight performance bounds of multihop fair access for MAC protocols in wireless sensor networks and underwater sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 11(10), 1538–1554. doi:10.1109/TMC.2011.190.CrossRef

21.

Dvir, A., & Vasilakos, A. (2010). Backpressure-based routing protocol for DTNs. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 40(4), 405.CrossRef

22.

Vasilakos, A., et al. (2011). Delay tolerant networks: Protocols and applications. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

23.

Lopez-Perez, D., et al. (2013). On distributed and coordinated resource allocation for interference mitigation in self-organizing LTE networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 21(4), 1145–1158.CrossRef

24.

Vasilakos, A., et al. (2015). Information centric network: Research challenges and opportunities. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 52(2015), 1–10.CrossRef

25.

Yang, M., et al. (2014). Software-defined and virtualized future mobile and wireless networks: A survey. Mobile Networks and Applications., 20(1), 4–18.CrossRef

26.

Sindhwani, N., & Vaid, R. (2013). VLEACH: An energy efficient communication protocol for WSN. Mechanica Confab, 2(2), 79–84.

27.

Zeng, Y., et al. (2012). Directional routing and scheduling for green vehicular delay tolerant networks. Wireless Networks, 19(2), 161–173.CrossRef

28.

Mehmood, A., et al. (2015). Energy-efficient multi-level and distance-aware clustering mechanism for WSNs. International Journal of Communication Systems, 28(5), 972–989.CrossRef

29.

Han, K., et al. (2013). Algorithm design for data communications in duty-cycled wireless sensor networks: A survey. IEEE Communications Magazine, 51(7), 107–113. doi:10.1109/MCOM.2013.6553686.CrossRef

30.

Ganesh, S., & Amutha, R. (2013). Efficient and secure routing protocol for wireless sensor networks through SNR based dynamic clustering mechanisms. Journal of Communications and Networks, 15(4), 422–429.CrossRef

31.

Meng, T., et al. (2015). Spatial reusability-aware routing in multi-hop wireless networks. IEEE TMC. doi:10.1109/TC.2015.2417543.MATH

32.

Xiang, L., Luo, J., & Rosenberg, C. (2013). Compressed data aggregation: Energy-efficient and high-fidelity data collection. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON), 21(6), 1722–1735.CrossRef

33.

Yao, Y., Cao, Q., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2015). EDAL: An energy-efficient, delay-aware, and lifetime-balancing data collection protocol for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 23(3), 810–823. doi:10.1109/TNET.2014.2306592.CrossRef

34.

Martinez-de, D., et al. (2013). Cooperation between uas and wireless sensor networks for efficient data collection in large environments. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, 70(1-4), 491–508.

35.

Liu, X., et al. (2015). CDC: Compressive data collection for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 26(8), 2188–2197.CrossRef

36.

Xiang, L., et al. (2011). Compressed data aggregation for energy efficient wireless sensor networks. In 2011 8th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON), Salt Lake City, UT (pp. 46–54). doi:10.1109/SAHCN.2011.5984932.

37.

Wei, G., et al. (2011). Prediction-based data aggregation in wireless sensor networks: Combining grey model and Kalman Filter. Computer Communications, 34(6), 793–802.MathSciNetCrossRef

38.

Prabhavathi, S., et al. (2016). Energy efficient dynamic reconfiguration of routing agents for WSN data aggregation. In N. R. Shetty, N. H. Prasad, & N. Nalini (Eds.), Emerging research in computing, information, communication and applications (pp. 291–301). Springer India.

39.

Sengupta, S., et al. (2012). An evolutionary multiobjective sleep-scheduling scheme for differentiated coverage in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 42(6), 1093–1102.CrossRef

40.

Yuning, S., et al. (2014). A biology-based algorithm to minimal exposure problem of wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 11(3), 417–430. doi:10.1109/TNSM.2014.2346080.CrossRef

41.

Liu, L., et al. (2015). Physarum optimization: A biology-inspired algorithm for the Steiner tree problem in networks. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 64(3), 818–831. doi:10.1109/TC.2013.229.MathSciNetCrossRef

42.

Acampora, G., et al. (2010). Interoperable and adaptive fuzzy services for ambient intelligence applications. ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems, 5(2), 1–26.CrossRef

43.

Gupta, I., et al. (2005). Cluster-head election using fuzzy logic for wireless sensor networks. In Communication Networks and Services Research Conference, 2005. Proceedings of the 3rd Annual. IEEE.

44.

Puneet, A., & Sharma, V. (2013). Cluster head selection in wireless sensor networks under fuzzy environment. ISRN Sensor Networks. doi:10.1155/2013/909086.

45.

AbdulAlim, M. A., et al. (2013). A fuzzy based clustering protocol for energy-efficient wireless sensor networks. Advanced Materials Research, 760–762, 685–690.CrossRef

46.

Nayak, P., & Devulapalli, A. (2016). A fuzzy logic-based clustering algorithm for WSN to extend the network lifetime. IEEE Sensors Journal, 16(1), 137–144.CrossRef

47.

Kim, J., et al. (2008). CHEF: Cluster head election mechanism using fuzzy logic in wireless sensor networks. In 10th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, 2008. ICACT 2008 (Vol. 1). IEEE.

48.

Heinzelman, W., et al. (2002). An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 1(4), 660–670.CrossRef

Title: Two-step fuzzy logic system to achieve energy efficiency and prolonging the lifetime of WSNs
Authors: Yahya Kord Tamandani
Mohammad Ubaidullah Bokhari
Qahtan Makki Shallal
Publication date: 09-04-2016
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Wireless Networks / Issue 6/2017
Print ISSN: 1022-0038
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8196
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-016-1266-3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 6/2017

Secure and reliable routing in cognitive radio networks

Online/offline signature based on UOV in wireless sensor networks

Incentive based scheme for improving data availability in vehicular ad-hoc networks

A distributed lightweight Redundancy aware Topology Control Protocol for wireless sensor networks

Wormhole-Free Routing and DoS Attack Defense in Wireless Mesh Networks

Diffusing-CRN k-means: an improved k-means clustering algorithm applied in cognitive radio ad hoc networks