Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Biodiversity and Conservation 12/2015

01-11-2015 | Commentary

When shooting a coyote kills a wolf: Mistaken identity or misguided management?

Authors: Thomas M. Newsome, Jeremy T. Bruskotter, William J. Ripple

Published in: Biodiversity and Conservation | Issue 12/2015

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The recovery of wolf populations in the United States (U.S.) is hampered by ongoing human-wolf conflicts. In particular, the illegal killing of grey wolves (Canis lupus), red wolves (Canis rufus), and Mexican wolves (Canis lupus baileyi) protected under the U.S. Endangered Species Act has contributed to relatively high mortality rates in some areas. One issue is that wolves are often mistaken as coyotes (Canis latrans) and illegally shot by hunters. To minimise cases of mistaken identity, stricter regulation of coyote hunting is being adopted in some areas where endangered wolves exist. Here we argue that such management should be adopted more widely, and especially in areas where wolves are at low densities or recolonising new areas. Such a proposal may face opposition, particularly where coyote hunting is common, or where coyotes are perceived as a threat to human enterprises such as livestock ranching. Appropriate education and training is needed to ensure that the public is aware that (i) wolves and coyotes are difficult to distinguish from a distance and (ii) coyotes are far too resilient to be affected by most periodic eradication programs, let alone from derbies or recreational hunting. We conclude that recreational hunting of coyotes could restrict wolf recolonisation while providing little benefit to animal agriculture. Consideration of new management strategies is therefore required to assist with wolf restoration efforts and to minimise ongoing human-wildlife conflicts.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Bruskotter JT, Wilson RS (2014) Determining where the wild things will be: using psychological theory to find tolerance for large carnivores. Conserv Lett 7:158–165. doi:10.1111/conl.12072 CrossRef Bruskotter JT, Wilson RS (2014) Determining where the wild things will be: using psychological theory to find tolerance for large carnivores. Conserv Lett 7:158–165. doi:10.​1111/​conl.​12072 CrossRef
go back to reference Bruskotter JT, Vucetich JA, Enzler S et al (2014) Removing protections for wolves and the future of the U.S. Endangered Species Act (1973). Conserv Lett 7:401–407. doi:10.1111/conl.12081 CrossRef Bruskotter JT, Vucetich JA, Enzler S et al (2014) Removing protections for wolves and the future of the U.S. Endangered Species Act (1973). Conserv Lett 7:401–407. doi:10.​1111/​conl.​12081 CrossRef
go back to reference Connolly GE, Longhurst WM (1975) The effects of control on coyote populations: a simulation model. Division of Agricultural Science, University of California, Davis, Bulletin 1872 Connolly GE, Longhurst WM (1975) The effects of control on coyote populations: a simulation model. Division of Agricultural Science, University of California, Davis, Bulletin 1872
go back to reference Crabtree RL, Sheldon JW (1999) Coyotes and canid coexistence. Carnivores in ecosystems: the Yellowstone experience. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 127–163 Crabtree RL, Sheldon JW (1999) Coyotes and canid coexistence. Carnivores in ecosystems: the Yellowstone experience. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 127–163
go back to reference Enzler SA, Bruskotter JT (2009) Contested definitions of endangered species: the controversy regarding how to interpret the phrase “a significant portion a species’ range”. Va Environ Law J 27:1–65 Enzler SA, Bruskotter JT (2009) Contested definitions of endangered species: the controversy regarding how to interpret the phrase “a significant portion a species’ range”. Va Environ Law J 27:1–65
go back to reference Gese E (2005) Demographic and spatial responses of coyotes to changes in food and exploitation. Wildl Damage Manag Conf 11:271–285 Gese E (2005) Demographic and spatial responses of coyotes to changes in food and exploitation. Wildl Damage Manag Conf 11:271–285
go back to reference Knowlton FF, Gese EM, Jaeger MM (1999) Coyote depredation control: an interface between biology and management. J Range Manag 52:398–412CrossRef Knowlton FF, Gese EM, Jaeger MM (1999) Coyote depredation control: an interface between biology and management. J Range Manag 52:398–412CrossRef
go back to reference Murray DL, Bastille-Rousseau G, Adams JR, Waits LP (in press) The challenges of red wolf conservation and the fate of an endangered species recovery program. Conserv Lett. doi: 10.1111/conl.12157 Murray DL, Bastille-Rousseau G, Adams JR, Waits LP (in press) The challenges of red wolf conservation and the fate of an endangered species recovery program. Conserv Lett. doi: 10.​1111/​conl.​12157
go back to reference Ripple WJ, Estes JA, Beschta RL et al (2014) Status and ecological effects of the world’s largest carnivores. Science 343:1241484CrossRefPubMed Ripple WJ, Estes JA, Beschta RL et al (2014) Status and ecological effects of the world’s largest carnivores. Science 343:1241484CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Smith DW, Bangs EE (2009) Reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone National Park: history, values and ecosystem restoration. Reintroduction of top order predators. Wiley-Blackwell, London, pp 92–125CrossRef Smith DW, Bangs EE (2009) Reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone National Park: history, values and ecosystem restoration. Reintroduction of top order predators. Wiley-Blackwell, London, pp 92–125CrossRef
go back to reference Thiel RP (2001) Keepers of the wolves: the early years of wolf recovery in Wisconsin. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison Thiel RP (2001) Keepers of the wolves: the early years of wolf recovery in Wisconsin. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison
go back to reference USFWS (2014a) Red Wolf Recovery Program: 2nd Quarter Report January–March 2014. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service USFWS (2014a) Red Wolf Recovery Program: 2nd Quarter Report January–March 2014. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
go back to reference USFWS (2014b) Mexican Wolf Recovery Program: 2013 Progress Report. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service USFWS (2014b) Mexican Wolf Recovery Program: 2013 Progress Report. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Metadata
Title
When shooting a coyote kills a wolf: Mistaken identity or misguided management?
Authors
Thomas M. Newsome
Jeremy T. Bruskotter
William J. Ripple
Publication date
01-11-2015
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation / Issue 12/2015
Print ISSN: 0960-3115
Electronic ISSN: 1572-9710
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-0999-0

Other articles of this Issue 12/2015

Biodiversity and Conservation 12/2015 Go to the issue