Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Biodiversity and Conservation 12/2015

01.11.2015 | Commentary

When shooting a coyote kills a wolf: Mistaken identity or misguided management?

verfasst von: Thomas M. Newsome, Jeremy T. Bruskotter, William J. Ripple

Erschienen in: Biodiversity and Conservation | Ausgabe 12/2015

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The recovery of wolf populations in the United States (U.S.) is hampered by ongoing human-wolf conflicts. In particular, the illegal killing of grey wolves (Canis lupus), red wolves (Canis rufus), and Mexican wolves (Canis lupus baileyi) protected under the U.S. Endangered Species Act has contributed to relatively high mortality rates in some areas. One issue is that wolves are often mistaken as coyotes (Canis latrans) and illegally shot by hunters. To minimise cases of mistaken identity, stricter regulation of coyote hunting is being adopted in some areas where endangered wolves exist. Here we argue that such management should be adopted more widely, and especially in areas where wolves are at low densities or recolonising new areas. Such a proposal may face opposition, particularly where coyote hunting is common, or where coyotes are perceived as a threat to human enterprises such as livestock ranching. Appropriate education and training is needed to ensure that the public is aware that (i) wolves and coyotes are difficult to distinguish from a distance and (ii) coyotes are far too resilient to be affected by most periodic eradication programs, let alone from derbies or recreational hunting. We conclude that recreational hunting of coyotes could restrict wolf recolonisation while providing little benefit to animal agriculture. Consideration of new management strategies is therefore required to assist with wolf restoration efforts and to minimise ongoing human-wildlife conflicts.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Bruskotter JT, Wilson RS (2014) Determining where the wild things will be: using psychological theory to find tolerance for large carnivores. Conserv Lett 7:158–165. doi:10.1111/conl.12072 CrossRef Bruskotter JT, Wilson RS (2014) Determining where the wild things will be: using psychological theory to find tolerance for large carnivores. Conserv Lett 7:158–165. doi:10.​1111/​conl.​12072 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bruskotter JT, Vucetich JA, Enzler S et al (2014) Removing protections for wolves and the future of the U.S. Endangered Species Act (1973). Conserv Lett 7:401–407. doi:10.1111/conl.12081 CrossRef Bruskotter JT, Vucetich JA, Enzler S et al (2014) Removing protections for wolves and the future of the U.S. Endangered Species Act (1973). Conserv Lett 7:401–407. doi:10.​1111/​conl.​12081 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Connolly GE, Longhurst WM (1975) The effects of control on coyote populations: a simulation model. Division of Agricultural Science, University of California, Davis, Bulletin 1872 Connolly GE, Longhurst WM (1975) The effects of control on coyote populations: a simulation model. Division of Agricultural Science, University of California, Davis, Bulletin 1872
Zurück zum Zitat Crabtree RL, Sheldon JW (1999) Coyotes and canid coexistence. Carnivores in ecosystems: the Yellowstone experience. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 127–163 Crabtree RL, Sheldon JW (1999) Coyotes and canid coexistence. Carnivores in ecosystems: the Yellowstone experience. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 127–163
Zurück zum Zitat Enzler SA, Bruskotter JT (2009) Contested definitions of endangered species: the controversy regarding how to interpret the phrase “a significant portion a species’ range”. Va Environ Law J 27:1–65 Enzler SA, Bruskotter JT (2009) Contested definitions of endangered species: the controversy regarding how to interpret the phrase “a significant portion a species’ range”. Va Environ Law J 27:1–65
Zurück zum Zitat Gese E (2005) Demographic and spatial responses of coyotes to changes in food and exploitation. Wildl Damage Manag Conf 11:271–285 Gese E (2005) Demographic and spatial responses of coyotes to changes in food and exploitation. Wildl Damage Manag Conf 11:271–285
Zurück zum Zitat Knowlton FF, Gese EM, Jaeger MM (1999) Coyote depredation control: an interface between biology and management. J Range Manag 52:398–412CrossRef Knowlton FF, Gese EM, Jaeger MM (1999) Coyote depredation control: an interface between biology and management. J Range Manag 52:398–412CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Liberg O, Chapron G, Wabakken P et al (2012) Shoot, shovel and shut up: cryptic poaching slows restoration of a large carnivore in Europe. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 279:910–915. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.1275 CrossRef Liberg O, Chapron G, Wabakken P et al (2012) Shoot, shovel and shut up: cryptic poaching slows restoration of a large carnivore in Europe. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 279:910–915. doi:10.​1098/​rspb.​2011.​1275 CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Murray DL, Bastille-Rousseau G, Adams JR, Waits LP (in press) The challenges of red wolf conservation and the fate of an endangered species recovery program. Conserv Lett. doi: 10.1111/conl.12157 Murray DL, Bastille-Rousseau G, Adams JR, Waits LP (in press) The challenges of red wolf conservation and the fate of an endangered species recovery program. Conserv Lett. doi: 10.​1111/​conl.​12157
Zurück zum Zitat Ripple WJ, Estes JA, Beschta RL et al (2014) Status and ecological effects of the world’s largest carnivores. Science 343:1241484CrossRefPubMed Ripple WJ, Estes JA, Beschta RL et al (2014) Status and ecological effects of the world’s largest carnivores. Science 343:1241484CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Smith DW, Bangs EE (2009) Reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone National Park: history, values and ecosystem restoration. Reintroduction of top order predators. Wiley-Blackwell, London, pp 92–125CrossRef Smith DW, Bangs EE (2009) Reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone National Park: history, values and ecosystem restoration. Reintroduction of top order predators. Wiley-Blackwell, London, pp 92–125CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Thiel RP (2001) Keepers of the wolves: the early years of wolf recovery in Wisconsin. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison Thiel RP (2001) Keepers of the wolves: the early years of wolf recovery in Wisconsin. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison
Zurück zum Zitat USFWS (2014a) Red Wolf Recovery Program: 2nd Quarter Report January–March 2014. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service USFWS (2014a) Red Wolf Recovery Program: 2nd Quarter Report January–March 2014. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Zurück zum Zitat USFWS (2014b) Mexican Wolf Recovery Program: 2013 Progress Report. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service USFWS (2014b) Mexican Wolf Recovery Program: 2013 Progress Report. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Metadaten
Titel
When shooting a coyote kills a wolf: Mistaken identity or misguided management?
verfasst von
Thomas M. Newsome
Jeremy T. Bruskotter
William J. Ripple
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2015
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Biodiversity and Conservation / Ausgabe 12/2015
Print ISSN: 0960-3115
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9710
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-0999-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2015

Biodiversity and Conservation 12/2015 Zur Ausgabe