Ching-Ling Fan
Skip Abstract Section
Skip Supplemental Material SectionAbstract
Head-mounted displays and 360° videos have become increasingly more popular, delivering a more immersive viewing experience to end users. Streaming 360° videos over the best-effort Internet, however, faces tremendous challenges, because of the high resolution and the short response time requirements. This survey presents the current literature related to 360° video streaming. We start with 360° video streaming systems built for real experiments to investigate the practicality and efficiency of 360° video streaming. We then present the video and viewer datasets, which may be used to drive large-scale simulations and experiments. Different optimization tools in various stages of the 360° video streaming pipeline are discussed in detail. We also present various applications enabled by 360° video streaming. In the appendices, we review the off-the-shelf hardware available at the time of writing and the open research problems.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
zip
fan.zip (97.5 KB)
Supplemental movie, appendix, image and software files for, A Survey on 360° Video Streaming: Acquisition, Transmission, and Display
- Ameer Abbasi and Uthman Baroudi. 2012. Immersive environment: An emerging future of telecommunications. IEEE MultiMedia 19, 1 (Jan. 2012), 80--80. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- M. Abdallah, C. Griwodz, K. Chen, G. Simon, P. Wang, and C. Hsu. 2018. Delay-sensitive video computing in the cloud: A survey. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications 14, 3S (2018), 54. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. De Abreu, C. Ozcinar, and A. Smolic. 2017. Look around you: Saliency maps for omnidirectional images in VR applications. In Proc. of QoMEX’17. 1--6.Google Scholar
- H. Afshari, V. Popovic, T. Tasci, A. Schmid, and Y. Leblebici. 2012. A spherical multi-camera system with real-time omnidirectional video acquisition capability. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics 58, 4 (Nov. 2012), 1110--1118.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Afzal, J. Chen, and K. Ramakrishnan. 2017. Characterization of 360-degree videos. In Proc. of ACM VR/AR Network’17. 1--6. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Aggarwal, A. Vohra, and A. Namboodiri. 2016. Panoramic stereo videos with a single camera. In Proc. of IEEE CVPR’16. 3755--3763.Google Scholar
- H. Ahmadi, O. Eltobgy, and M. Hefeeda. 2017. Adaptive multicast streaming of virtual reality content to mobile users. In Proc. of ACM Thematic Workshops’17. 170--178. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Albert, A. Patney, D. Luebke, and J. Kim. 2017. Latency requirements for foveated rendering in virtual reality. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 14, 4 (2017), 25. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Alface, M. Aerts, D. Tytgat, S. Lievens, C. Stevens, N. Verzijp, and J. Macq. 2017. 16K cinematic VR streaming. In Proc. of ACM MM’17. 1105--1112. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Almquist, V. Almquist, V. Krishnamoorthi, N. Carlsson, and D. Eager. 2018. The prefetch aggressiveness tradeoff in 360° video streaming. In Proc. of ACM MMSys’18. 258--269. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Anderson, D. Gallup, J. Barron, J. Kontkanen, N. Snavely, C. Hernandez, S. Agarwal, and S. Seitz. 2016. Jump: Virtual reality video. ACM Transactions on Graphics 35, 6 (Nov. 2016), 198. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Apostolopoulos, P. Chou, B. Culbertson, T. Kalker, M. Trott, and S. Wee. 2012. The road to immersive communication. Proceedings of the IEEE 100, 4 (Feb. 2012), 974--990.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Y. Ban, L. Xie, Z. Xu, X. Zhang, Z. Guo, and Y. Wang. 2018. Cub360: Exploiting cross-users behaviors for viewport prediction in 360 video adaptive streaming. In Proc. of IEEE ICME’18. 1--6.Google Scholar
- Y. Bao, H. Wu, T. Zhang, A. Ramli, and X. Liu. 2016. Shooting a moving target: Motion-prediction-based transmission for 360-degree videos. In Proc. of IEEE Big Data’16. 1161--1170.Google Scholar
- Y. Bao, T. Zhang, A. Pande, H. Wu, and X. Liu. 2017. Motion-prediction-based multicast for 360-degree video transmissions. In Proc. of IEEE SECON’17. 1--9.Google Scholar
- A. Belbachir, S. Schraml, M. Mayerhofer, and M. Hofstatter. 2014. A novel HDR depth camera for real-time 3D 360° panoramic vision. In Proc. of IEEE CVPR’14. 425--432. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Berning, T. Yonezawa, T. Riedel, J. Nakazawa, M. Beigl, and H. Tokuda. 2013. pARnorama: 360 degree interactive video for augmented reality prototyping. In Proc. of ACM UbiComp’13. 1471--1474. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Bessa, M. Melo, D. Narciso, L. Barbosa, and J. Vasconcelos-Raposo. 2016. Does 3D 360 video enhance user’s VR experience: An evaluation study. In Proc. of Interaction’16. Article 16, 4 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Boyce, Y. Ye, J. Chen, and A. Ramasubramonian. 2016. Overview of SHVC: Scalable extensions of the high efficiency video coding standard. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 26, 1 (Jan. 2016), 20--34.Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Calagari, M. Elgharib, S. Shirmohammadi, and M. Hefeeda. 2017. Sports VR content generation from regular camera feeds. In Proc. of ACM MM’17. 699--707. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Canessa and L. Tenze. 2014. FishEyA: Live broadcasting around 360 degrees. In Proc. of ACM VRST’14. 227--228. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Chakareski. 2017. VR/AR immersive communication. In Proc. of ACM VR/AR Network’17. 36--41. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Chakareski, R. Aksu, X. Corbillon, G. Simon, and V. Swaminathan. 2018. Viewport-driven rate-distortion optimized 360º video streaming. In Proc. of IEEE ICC’18. 1--7.Google Scholar
- D. Chatzopoulos, C. Bermejo, Z. Huang, and P. Hui. 2017. Mobile augmented reality survey: From where we are to where we go. IEEE Access 5 (April 2017), 6917--6950.Google Scholar
- S. Chen. 2017. Transform360 Is an Equirectangular to Cubemap Transform for 360 Video. Retrieved April 26, 2018 from https://github.com/facebook/transform360.Google Scholar
- H. Cheng, C. Chao, J. Dong, H. Wen, T. Liu, and M. Sun. 2018. Cube padding for weakly-supervised saliency prediction in 360 videos. In Proc. of IEEE CVPR’18. 1420--1429.Google Scholar
- K. Choi and K. Jun. 2016. Real-time panorama video system using networked multiple cameras. Journal of Systems Architecture 64 (March 2016), 110--121. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Chou, Y. Chen, K. Zeng, H. G. Hu, J. Fu, and M. Sun. 2018. Self-view Grounding given a narrated 360 video. In Proc. of AAAI’18.Google Scholar
- HTC Co. 2017. VIVE: Discover Virtual Reality Beyond Imagination. Retrieved April 26, 2018 from https://www.vive.com/us/.Google Scholar
- O. Cogal, A. Akin, K. Seyid, V. Popovic, A. Schmid, B. Ott, P. Wellig, and Y. Leblebici. 2014. A new omni-directional multi-camera system for high resolution surveillance. Mobile Multimedia/Image Processing, Security, and Applications 9120, 9 (May 2014), 91200N-1--91200N-9.Google Scholar
- C. Concolato, J. Feuvre, F. Denoual, E. Nassor, N. Ouedraogo, and J. Taquet. 2018. Adaptive streaming of HEVC tiled videos using MPEG-DASH. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 28, 8 (Aug. 2018), 1981--1992.Google ScholarCross Ref
- X. Corbillon. 2017. 360Transformations. Retrieved April 26, 2018 from https://github.com/xmar/360Transformations.Google Scholar
- X. Corbillon, A. Devlic, G. Simon, and J. Chakareski. 2017. Optimal set of 360-degree videos for viewport-adaptive streaming. In Proc. of ACM MM’17. 943--951. Google ScholarDigital Library
- X. Corbillon, G. Simon, A. Devlic, and J. Chakareski. 2017. Viewport-adaptive navigable 360-degree video delivery. In Proc. of IEEE ICC’17. 1--7.Google Scholar
- X. Corbillon, F. Simone, and G. Simon. 2017. 360-degree video head movement dataset. In Proc. of ACM MMSys’17. 199--204. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. da Costa Filho, M. Luizelli, M. Torres Vega, J. van der Hooft, S. Petrangeli, T. Wauters, F. De Turck, and L. Gaspary. 2018. Predicting the performance of virtual reality video streaming in mobile networks. In Proc. of ACM MMSys’18. 270--283. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. D’Acunto, J. Berg, E. Thomas, and O. Niamut. 2016. Using MPEG DASH SRD for zoomable and navigable video. In Proc. of ACM MMSys’16. Article 34, 4 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Dambra, G. Samela, L. Sassatelli, R. Pighetti, R. Aparicio-Pardo, and A. Pinna-Dery. 2018. Film editing: New levers to improve VR streaming. In Proc. of ACM MMSys’18. 27--39. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. David, J. Gutierrez, A. Coutrot, M. Da Silva, and P. Callet. 2018. A dataset of head and eye movements for 360° videos. In Proc. of ACM MMSys’18. 432--437. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Delforouzi and M. Grzegorzek. 2017. Robust and fast object tracking for challenging 360-degree videos. In Proc. of IEEE ISM’17. 274--277.Google Scholar
- M. Domanski, O. Stankiewicz, K. Wegner, and T. Grajek. 2017. Immersive visual media MPEG-I: 360 video, virtual navigation and beyond. In Proc. of IWSSIP’17. 1--9.Google Scholar
- Doxygen. 2017. HEVC Test Model (HM). Retrieved April 26, 2018 from https://hevc.hhi.fraunhofer.de/HM-doc/.Google Scholar
- F. Duanmu, E. Kurdoglu, S. Hosseini, Y. Liu, and Y. Wang. 2017. Prioritized buffer control in two-tier 360 video streaming. In Proc. of ACM VR/AR Network’17. 13--18. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Egan, S. Brennan, J. Barrett, Y. Qiao, C. Timmerer, and N. Murray. 2016. An evaluation of heart rate and electrodermal activity as an objective QoE evaluation method for immersive virtual reality environments. In Proc. of QoMEX’16. 1--6.Google Scholar
- T. El-Ganainy and M. Hefeeda. 2016. Streaming virtual reality content. arXiv: 1612.08350.Google Scholar
- Samsung Electronics. 2017. The GearVR Framework (GearVRf). Retrieved April 26, 2018 from https://github.com/Samsung/GearVRf.Google Scholar
- C. Fan, J. Lee, W. Lo, C. Huang, K. Chen, and C. Hsu. 2017. Fixation prediction for 360° video streaming in head-mounted virtual reality. In Proc. of ACM NOSSDAV’17. 67--72. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. Fenlon. 2013. The Challenge of Latency in Virtual Reality. Retrieved April 26, 2018 from http://www.tested.com/tech/concepts/452656-challenge-latency-virtual-reality/.Google Scholar
- A. Fernandes and S. Feiner. 2016. Combating VR sickness through subtle dynamic field-of-view modification. In Proc. of IEEE 3DUI’16. 201--210.Google Scholar
- A. Ferworn, B. Waismark, and M. Scanlan. 2015. CAT 360: Canine augmented technology 360-degree video system. In Proc. of IEEE SSRR’15. 1--4.Google Scholar
- J. Le Feuvre and C. Concolato. 2016. Tiled-based adaptive streaming using MPEG-DASH. In Proc. of ACM MMSys’16. Article 41, 3 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Foote and D. Kimber. 2000. FlyCam: Practical panoramic video and automatic camera control. In Proc. of IEEE ICME’00. 1419--1422.Google Scholar
- FOVE Inc.2019. FOVE: Eye-Tracking Virtual Reality Headset. Retrieved July 30, 2019 from https://www.getfove.com/.Google Scholar
- S. Fremerey, A. Singla, K. Meseberg, and A. Raake. 2018. AVtrack360: An open dataset and software recording people’s head rotations watching 360° videos on an HMD. In Proc. of ACM MMSys’18. 403--408. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. Sanchez, R. Skupin, and T. Schierl. 2015. Compressed domain video processing for tile based panoramic streaming using HEVC. In Proc. of IEEE ICIP’15. 2244--2248.Google Scholar
- The Medical Futurist. 2017. 5 Ways Medical Virtual Reality Is Already Changing Healthcare. Retrieved April 26, 2018 from http://medicalfuturist.com/5-ways-medical-vr-is-changing-healthcare/.Google Scholar
- V. Gaddam, H. Ngo, R. Langseth, C. Griwodz, D. Johansen, and P. Halvorsen. 2015. Tiling of panorama video for interactive virtual cameras: Overheads and potential bandwidth requirement reduction. In Proc. of PCS’15. 204--209.Google Scholar
- L. Gaemperle, K. Seyid, V. Popovic, and Y. Leblebici. 2014. An immersive telepresence system using a real-time omnidirectional camera and a virtual reality head-mounted display. In Proc. of IEEE ISM’14. 175--178. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Google Inc. 2017. Google Cardboard. Retrieved April 26, 2018 from https://vr.google.com/intl/en_us/cardboard/.Google Scholar
- M. Graf, C. Timmerer, and C. Mueller. 2017. Towards bandwidth efficient adaptive streaming of omnidirectional video over HTTP. In Proc. of ACM MMSys’17. 261--271. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Halik. 2017. OpenTrack: Head Tracking Software for MS Windows, Linux, and Apple OSX. Retrieved April 26, 2018 from https://github.com/opentrack/opentrack.Google Scholar
- B. Hayes, Y. Chang, and G. Riley. 2017. Omnidirectional adaptive bitrate media delivery using MPTCP/QUIC over an SDN architecture. In Proc. of IEEE GLOBCOMM’17. 1--6.Google Scholar
- B. Hayes, Y. Chang, and G. Riley. 2018. Controlled unfair adaptive 360 VR video delivery over an MPTCP/QUIC architecture. In Proc. of IEEE ICC’18. 1--6.Google Scholar
- B. Hayes, Y. Chang, and G. Riley. 2018. Scaling 360-degree adaptive bitrate video delivery over an SDN architecture. In Proc. of IEEE ICNC’18. 604--608.Google Scholar
- G. He, J. Hu, H. Jiang, and Y. Li. 2018. Scalable video coding based on user’s view for real-time virtual reality applications. IEEE Communications Letters 22, 1 (2018), 25--28.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Heinrich-Hertz-Institution. 2017. HEVC Scalability Extension (SHVC). Retrieved April 26, 2018 from https://hevc.hhi.fraunhofer.de/shvc.Google Scholar
- S. Heymann, A. Smolic, K. Muller, Y. Guo, J. Rurainsky, P. Eisert, and T. Wiegand. 2005. Representation, coding and interactive rendering of high-resolution panoramic images and video using MPEG-4. In Proc. of PPW’05.Google Scholar
- D. Hoffman, A. Girshick, K. Akeley, and M. Banks. 2008. Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. Journal of Vision 8, 3 (March 2008), 1--30.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Hosseini and V. Swaminathan. 2016. Adaptive 360 VR video streaming: Divide and conquer. In Proc. of IEEE ISM’16. 107--110.Google Scholar
- X. Hou, Y. Lu, and S. Dey. 2017. Wireless VR/AR with edge/cloud computing. In Proc. of ICCCN’17. 1--8.Google Scholar
- C. Hsu, A. Chen, C., C. Huang, C. Lei, and K. Chen. 2017. Is foveated rendering perceivable in virtual reality: Exploring the efficiency and consistency of quality assessment methods. In Proc. of ACM MM’17. 55--63. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. Hu, S. Xie, Y. Xu, and J. Sun. 2017. Dynamic VR live streaming over MMT. In Proc. of BMSB’17. 1--4.Google Scholar
- J. Huang, Z. Chen, D. Ceylan, and H. Jin. 2017. 6-DOF VR videos with a single 360-camera. In Proc. of IEEE VR’17. 37--44.Google Scholar
- W. Huang, L. Ding, G. Zhai, X. Min, J. Hwang, Y. Xu, and W. Zhang. 2019. Utility-oriented resource allocation for 360-degree video transmission over heterogeneous networks. Digital Signal Processing 84 (2019), 1--14.Google ScholarCross Ref
- I. Hupont, J. Gracia, L. Sanagustin, and M. Gracia. 2015. How do new visual immersive systems influence gaming QoE: A use case of serious gaming with oculus rift. In Proc. of QoMEX’15. 1--6.Google Scholar
- S. Im, H. Ha, F. Rameau, H. Jeon, G. Choe, and I. S. Kweon. 2016. All-around depth from small motion with a spherical panoramic camera. In Proc. of ACM ECCV’16. 156--172.Google Scholar
- Cisco Inc. 2017. Cisco Visual Networking Index: Forecast and Methodology, 2017--2022. Retrieved April 26, 2018 from https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/visual-networking-index-vni/white-paper-c11-741490.html.Google Scholar
- Facebook Inc. 2017. Facebook Spaces. Retrieved April 26, 2018 from https://www.facebook.com/spaces.Google Scholar
- Google Inc. 2017. ExoPlayer: An Extensible Media Player for Android. Retrieved April 26, 2018 from https://github.com/google/ExoPlayer.Google Scholar
- M. Inoue, H. Kimata, K. Fukazawa, and N. Matsuura. 2010. Interactive panoramic video streaming system over restricted bandwidth network. In Proc. of ACM MM’10. 1191--1194. Google ScholarDigital Library
- ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11/N17197. 2017. Algorithm Descriptions of Projection Format Conversion and Video Quality Metrics in 360Lib. Standard. International Telecommunication Union.Google Scholar
- N. Jiang, V. Swaminathan, and S. Wei. 2017. Power evaluation of 360 VR video streaming on head mounted display devices. In Proc. of ACM NOSSDAV’17. 55--60. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. Jiang and J. Gu. 2015. Video stitching with spatial-temporal content-preserving warping. In Proc. of IEEE CVPR’15. 42--48.Google Scholar
- T. Kamarainen, M. Siekkinen, J. Eerikainen, and A. Yla-Jaaski. 2018. CloudVR: Cloud accelerated interactive mobile virtual reality. In Proc. of ACM MM’18. 1181--1189. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Kasahara, S. Nagai, and J. Rekimoto. 2015. First person omnidirectional video: System design and implications for immersive experience. In Proc. of ACM TVX’15. 33--42. Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Khiem, G. Ravindra, and W. Ooi. 2012. Adaptive encoding of zoomable video streams based on user access pattern. Signal Processing: Image Communication 27, 4 (April 2012), 360--377. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. Kim, J. Yang, M. Choi, J. Lee, S. Yoon, Y. Kim, and W Park. 2018. Eye tracking based foveated rendering for 360 VR tiled video. In Proc. of ACM IMMSys’18. 484--486. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. Kim, J. Yang, M. Choi, J. Lee, S. Yoon, Y. Kim, and W. Park. 2018. Immersive 360° VR tiled streaming system for esports service. In Proc. of ACM MMSys’18. 541--544. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Kim, W. Kim, S. Ahn, J. Kim, and S. Lee. 2018. Virtual reality sickness predictor: Analysis of visual-vestibular conflict and VR contents. In Proc. of QoMEX’18. 1--6.Google Scholar
- H. Kimata, M. Isogai, H. Noto, M. Inoue, K. Fukazawa, and N. Matsuura. 2011. Interactive panorama video distribution system. In Proc. of ITUWT’11. 45--50.Google Scholar
- H. Kimata, D. Ochi, A. Kameda, H. Noto, K. Fukazawa, and A. Kojima. 2012. Mobile and multi-device interactive panorama video distribution system. In Proc. of IEEE GCCE’12. 574--578.Google Scholar
- J. Kopf. 2016. 360° video stabilization. ACM Transactions on Graphics 35, 6 (Nov. 2016), Article 195, 9 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Krevelen and R. Poelman. 2010. A survey of augmented reality technologies, applications and limitations. International Journal of Virtual Reality 9, 2 (June 2010), 1--20.Google Scholar
- G. Krishnan and S. Nayar. 2008. Cata-fisheye camera for panoramic imaging. In Proc. of IEEE WACV’08. 1--8. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. Lai and C. Hsu. 2018. Refocusing supports of panorama light-field images in head-mounted virtual reality. In Proc. of AltMM’18. 15--20. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Lamkin. 2017. Best VR Headsets 2017: HTC Vive, Oculus, PlayStation VR compared. Retrieved April 26, 2018 from https://www.wareable.com/vr/best-vr-headsets-2017.Google Scholar
- A. Langley, A. Riddoch, A. Wilk, A. Vicente, C. Krasic, D. Zhang, F. Yang, et al. 2017. The QUIC transport protocol: Design and Internet-scale deployment. In Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM’17. 183--196. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Lee, A. Tabatabai, and K. Tashiro. 2015. Free viewpoint video (FVV) Survey and future research direction. APSIPA Transactions on Signal and Information Processing 4, 15 (Oct. 2015), 1--10.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Lee, B. Kim, K. Kim, Y. Kim, and J. Noh. 2016. Rich360: Optimized spherical representation from structured panoramic camera arrays. ACM Transactions on Graphics 35, 4 (July 2016), Article 63, 11 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. Lee, H. Chen, M. Chen, I. Shen, and B. Chen. 2017. High-resolution 360 video foveated stitching for real-time VR. Computer Graphics Forum 36, 115--123.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. Li, Z. Li, X. Ma, H. Yang, and H. Li. 2017. Co-projection-plane based 3-D padding for polyhedron projection for 360-degree video. In Proc. of IEEE ICME’17. 55--60.Google Scholar
- S. Lim, J. Seok, , and T. Kim. 2015. Tiled panoramic video transmission system based on MPEG-DASH. In Proc. of ICTC’15. 719--721.Google Scholar
- K. Lin, S. Liu, L. Cheong, and B. Zeng. 2016. Seamless video stitching from hand-held camera inputs. Computer Graphics Forum 35, 2 (May 2016), 479--487.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC.2017. PlayStation: PlayStation Console, Games, Accessories. Home Page. Retrieved April 26, 2018 from https://www.playstation.com/en-us/.Google Scholar
- W. Lo, C. Fan, J. Lee, C. Huang, K. Chen, and C. Hsu. 2017. 360° video viewing dataset in head-mounted virtual reality. In Proc. of ACM MMSys’17. 211--216. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. Lo, C. Fan, S. Yen, and C. Hsu. 2017. Performance measurements of 360° video streaming to head-mounted displays over live 4G cellular networks. In Proc. of APNOMS’17. 205--210.Google Scholar
- W. Lo, C. Huang, and C. Hsu. 2018. Edge-assisted rendering of 360° videos streamed to head-mounted virtual reality. In Proc. of IEEE ISM’18. 44--51.Google Scholar
- K. Loria. 2016. Virtual Reality Is About to Completely Transform Psychological Therapy. Retrieved April 26, 2018 from https://www.businessinsider.com/how-virtual-reality-is-used-for-ptsd-and-anxiety-therapy-2016-1.Google Scholar
- A. Mahzari, A. Nasrabadi, A. Samiei, and R. Prakash. 2018. FoV-aware edge caching for adaptive 360° video streaming. In Proc. of ACM MM’18. 914--922. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Mangiante, G. Klas, A. Navon, Z. GuanHua, J. Ran, and M. Silva. 2017. VR is on the edge: How to deliver 360° videos in mobile networks. In Proc. of ACM VR/AR Network’17. 30--35. Google ScholarDigital Library
- I. Markovic, F. Chaumette, and I. Petrovic. 2014. Moving object detection, tracking and following using an omnidirectional camera on a mobile robot. In Proc. of IEEE ICRA’14. 5630--5635.Google Scholar
- A. Mavlankar and B. Girod. 2010. Video streaming with interactive pan/tilt/zoom. In High-Quality Visual Experience, M. Mrak, M. Grgic, and M. Kunt (Eds.). Springer, 431--455.Google Scholar
- T. Merel. 2016. Augmented Virtual Reality Revenue Forecast Revised to Hit 120 Billion by 2020. Retrieved April 26, 2018 from https://seekingalpha.com/article/3808846-augmented-virtual-reality-revenue-forecast-revised-hit-120-billion-2020.Google Scholar
- K. Misra, A. Segall, M. Horowitz, S. Xu, A. Fuldseth, and M. Zhou. 2013. An overview of tiles in HEVC. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing 7, 6 (Dec. 2013), 969--977.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Monroy, S. Lutz, T. Chalasani, and A. Smolic. 2018. Salnet360: Saliency maps for omni-directional images with CNN. Signal Processing: Image Communication 69 (2018), 26--34.Google ScholarCross Ref
- MPlayer. 2017. MPlayer: The Movie Player. Home Page. Retrieved April 26, 2018 from http://www.mplayerhq.hu.Google Scholar
- M. Stengel, S. Grogorick, M. Eisemann, E. Eisemann, and M. Magnor. 2015. An affordable solution for binocular eye tracking and calibration in head-mounted displays. In Proc. of ACM MM’15. 15--24. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Yu, H. Lakshman, and B. Girod. 2015. Content adaptive representations of omnidirectional videos for cinematic virtual reality. In Proc. of ACM ImmersiveMe’15. 1--6. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Nasrabadi, A. Mahzari, J. Beshay, and R. Prakash. 2017. Adaptive 360-degree video streaming using scalable video coding. In Proc. of ACM MM’17. 1689--1697. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Neng and T. Chambel. 2010. Get around 360° hypervideo. In Proc. of MindTrek’10. 119--122. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Nguyen, Z. Yan, and K. Nahrstedt. 2018. Your attention is unique: Detecting 360-degree video saliency in head-mounted display for head movement prediction. In Proc. of ACM MM’18. 1190--1198. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Nguyen, H. Tran, A. Pham, and T. Thang. 2017. A new adaptation approach for viewport-adaptive 360-degree video streaming. In Proc. of IEEE ISM’17. 38--44.Google Scholar
- D. Nguyen, H. Tran, A. Pham, and T. Thang. 2019. An optimal tile-based approach for viewport-adaptive 360-degree video streaming. IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems 9, 1, 29--42.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Nguyen, H. Tran, and T. Thang. 2019. Adaptive tiling selection for viewport adaptive streaming of 360-degree video. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems 102, 1 (2019), 48--51.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Nguyen, H. Tran, and T. Thang. 2019. A client-based adaptation framework for 360-degree video streaming. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 59 (2019), 231--243.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Nguyen, D. Nguyen, C. Pham, N. Ngoc, D. Nguyen, and T. Thang. 2017. An adaptive streaming method of 360 videos over HTTP/2 protocol. In Proc. of NICS’17. 302--307.Google Scholar
- O. Niamut, A. Kochale, J. Hidalgo, R. Kaiser, J. Spille, J. Macq, G. Kienast, O. Schreer, and B. Shirley. 2013. Towards a format-agnostic approach for production, delivery and rendering of immersive media. In Proc. of ACM MMSys’13. 249--260. Google ScholarDigital Library
- O. Niamut, E. Thomas, L. D’Acunto, C. Concolato, F. Denoual, and S. Lim. 2016. MPEG DASH SRD: Spatial relationship description. In Proc. of ACM MMSys’16. Article 5, 8 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Nielsen. 2016. Nielsen’s Law of Internet Bandwidth. Retrieved April 26, 2018 from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/law-of-bandwidth.Google Scholar
- G. Noronha, C. Alvares, and T. Chambel. 2012. Sharing and navigating 360° videos and maps in sight surfers. In Proc. of MindTrek’12. 255--262. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Ochi, Y. Kunita, K. Fujii, A. Kojima, S. Iwaki, and J. Hirose. 2014. HMD viewing spherical video streaming system. In Proc. of the ACM MM’14. 763--764. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Ochi, Y. Kunita, A. Kameda, A. Kojima, and S. Iwaki. 2015. Live streaming system for omnidirectional video. In Proc. of IEEE VR’15. 349--350.Google Scholar
- Oculus VR LLC. 2017. Facebook Oculus Rift. Home Page. Retrieved April 26, 2018 from https://www.oculus.com/.Google Scholar
- Canadian Association of Optometrists. 2017. Are Virtual Reality Headsets Dangerous for Our Eyes? Retrieved April 26, 2018 from https://opto.ca/health-library/are-virtual-reality-headsets-dangerous-for-our-eyes.Google Scholar
- J. Ohm and G. Sullivan. 2013. High efficiency video coding: The next frontier in video compression {standards in a nutshell}. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 30, 1 (Jan. 2013), 152--158.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Ohta, S. Nagano, K. Nagata, and K. Yamashita. 2015. Mixed-reality Web shopping system using panoramic view inside real store. In Proc. of SA’15. Article 15, 3 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Oliva. 2017. A Reference Client Implementation for the Playback of MPEG DASH via Javascript and Compliant Browsers. Retrieved April 26, 2018 from https://github.com/Dash-Industry-Forum/dash.js/.Google Scholar
- C. Ozcinar, A. Abreu, S. Knorr, and A. Smolic. 2017. Estimation of optimal encoding ladders for tiled 360° VR video in adaptive streaming systems. In Proc. of IEEE ISM’17. 45--52.Google Scholar
- C. Ozcinar, A. Abreu, and A. Smolic. 2017. Viewport-aware adaptive 360° video streaming using tiles for virtual reality. In Proc. of IEEE ICIP’17. 2174--2178.Google Scholar
- C. Ozcinar, J. Cabrera, and A. Smolic. 2019. Visual attention-aware omnidirectional video streaming using optimal tiles for virtual reality. IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems 9, 1 (March 2019), 217--230.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Y. Pai, B. Tag, B. Outram, N. Vontin, K. Sugiura, and K. Kunze. 2016. GazeSim: Simulating foveated rendering using depth in eye gaze for VR. In Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH’16 Posters. 75. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Telecom ParisTech. 2017. MP4Box. Retrieved April 26, 2018 from https://gpac.wp.imt.fr/mp4box/.Google Scholar
- Telecom ParisTech. 2017. MP4Client. Retrieved April 26, 2018 from https://github.com/gpac/gpac/wiki/MP4Client.Google Scholar
- Telecom ParisTech. 2017. GPAC-Multimedia Open Source Project. Retrieved April 26, 2018 from https://gpac.wp.imt.fr/.Google Scholar
- A. Patney, J. Kim, M. Salvi, A. Kaplanyan, C. Wyman, N. Benty, A. Lefohn, and D. Luebke. 2016. Perceptually-based foveated virtual reality. In Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH’16. 17. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Patney, M. Salvi, J. Kim, A. Kaplanyan, C. Wyman, N. Benty, D. Luebke, and A. Lefohn. 2016. Towards foveated rendering for gaze-tracked virtual reality. ACM Transactions on Graphics 35, 6 (2016), 179. Google ScholarDigital Library
- F. Perazzi, A. Sorkine-Hornung, H. Zimmer, P. Kaufmann, O. Wang, S. Watson, and M. Gross. 2015. Panoramic video from unstructured camera arrays. Computer Graphics Forum 34, 2 (June 2015), 57--68. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Petrangeli, J. Hooft, T. Wauters, R. Huysegems, P. Alface, T. Bostoen, and F. Turck. 2016. Live streaming of 4K ultra-high definition video over the Internet. In Proc. of ACM MMSys’16. Article 27, 4 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Petrangeli, V. Swaminathan, M. Hosseini, and F. Turck. 2017. An HTTP/2-based adaptive streaming framework for 360° virtual reality videos. In Proc. of ACM MM’17. 306--314. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Petrangeli, F. Turck, V. Swaminathan, and M. Hosseini. 2017. Improving virtual reality streaming using HTTP/2. In Proc. of ACM MMSys’17. 225--228. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Petry and J. Huber. 2015. Towards effective interaction with omnidirectional videos using immersive virtual reality headsets. In Proc. of ACM AH’15. 217--218. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Pohl, X. Zhang, A. Bulling, and O. Grau. 2016. Concept for using eye tracking in a head-mounted display to adapt rendering to the user’s current visual field. In Proc. of ACM VRST’16. 323--324. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Prins, O. Niamut, R. Brandenburg, J. Macq, P. Alface, and N. Verzijp. 2013. A hybrid architecture for delivery of panoramic video. In Proc. of EuroITV’13. 99--106. Google ScholarDigital Library
- F. Qian, L. Ji, B. Han, and V. Gopalakrishnan. 2016. Optimizing 360 video delivery over cellular networks. In Proc. of ATC’16. 1--6. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Quax, J. Liesenborgs, P. Issaris, W. Lamotte, and J. Claes. 2013. A practical and scalable method for streaming omni-directional video to Web users. In Proc. of ACM ImmersiveMe’13. 57--60. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Ju, J. He, F. Sun, J Li, F. Li, J. Zhu, L. Han. 2017. Ultra wide view based panoramic VR streaming. In Proc. of ACM VR/AR Network’17. 19--23. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. Rai, J. Gutierrez, and P. Callet. 2017. A dataset of head and eye movements for 360 degree images. In Proc. of ACM MMSys’17. 205--210. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Open Source Virtual Reality. 2018. OSVR. Home Page. Retrieved April 26, 2018 from http://osvr.github.io/.Google Scholar
- G. Regal, R. Schatz, S. Johann, and S. Suette. 2018. VRate: A Unity3D asset for integrating subjective assessment questionnaires in virtual environments. In Proc. of QoMEX’18. 1--6.Google Scholar
- M. Rerabek, E. Upenik, and T. Ebrahimi. 2016. JPEG backward compatible coding of omnidirectional images. Applications of Digital Image Processing XXXIX 9971, 10 (Sept. 2016), 1--12.Google Scholar
- M. Romero-Rondon, L. Sassatelli, F. Precioso, and R. Aparicio-Pardo. 2018. Foveated streaming of virtual reality videos. In Proc. of ACM MMSys’18. 494--497. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. Sanchez, R. Skupin, C. Hellge, and T. Schierl. 2017. Spatio-temporal activity based tiling for panorama streaming. In Proc. of ACM NOSSDAV’17. 61--66. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Sauer, J. Schneider, and M. Wien. 2017. Improved motion compensation for 360° video projected to polytopes. In Proc. of IEEE ICME’17. 61--66.Google Scholar
- R. Schafer, P. Kauff, R. Skupin, Y. Sanchez, and C. Weissig. 2017. Interactive streaming of panoramas and VR worlds. SMPTE Motion Imaging Journal 126, 1 (Jan. 2017), 35--42.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Schatz, G. Regal, S. Schwarz, S. Suettc, and M. Kempf. 2018. Assessing the QoE impact of 3D rendering style in the context of VR-based training. In Proc. of QoMEX’18. 1--6.Google Scholar
- O. Schreer, I. Feldmann, C. Weissig, P. Kauff, and R. Schafer. 2013. Ultrahigh-resolution panoramic imaging for format-agnostic video production. Proceedings of the IEEE 101, 1 (Jan. 2013), 99--114.Google ScholarCross Ref
- ITU Radiocommunications Sector. 2012. Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television picture. ITU-R Recommendation BT.500, 13 (Jan. 2012).Google Scholar
- ITU Telecommunication Standardization Sector. 2008. Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications. ITU-T Recommendation P.910 (April 2008).Google Scholar
- R. Silva, B. Feijo, P. Gomes, T. Frensh, and D. Monteiro. 2016. Real time 360° video stitching and streaming. In Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH’16 Posters. Article 70. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Singla, S. Fremerey, W. Robitza, P. Lebreton, and A. Raake. 2017. Comparison of subjective quality evaluation for HEVC encoded omnidirectional videos at different bit-rates for UHD and FHD resolution. In Proc. of ACM Thematic Workshops’17. 511--519. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Singla, S. Fremerey, W. Robitza, and A. Raake. 2017. Measuring and comparing QoE and simulator sickness of omnidirectional videos in different head mounted displays. In Proc. of QoMEX’17. 1--6.Google Scholar
- A. Singla, S. Goring, A. Raake, B. Meixner, R. Koenen, and T. Buchholz. 2019. Subjective quality evaluation of tile-based streaming for omnidirectional videos. In Proc. of ACM MMSys’19. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Skupin, Y. Sanchez, C. Hellge, and T. Schierl. 2016. Tile based HEVC video for head mounted displays. In Proc. of IEEE ISM’16. 399--400.Google Scholar
- J. Son, D. Jang, and E. Ryu. 2018. Implementing 360 video tiled streaming system. In Proc. of ACM MMSys’18. 521--524. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Son, D. Jang, and E. Ryu. 2018. Implementing motion-constrained tile and viewport extraction for VR streaming. In Proc. of ACM NOSSDAV’18. 61--66. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Steed, S. Friston, M. Lopez, J. Drummond, Y. Pan, and D. Swapp. 2016. An ‘in the wild’ experiment on presence and embodiment using consumer virtual reality equipment. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22, 4 (Jan. 2016), 1406--1414. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Sullivan, J. Ohm, W. Han, and T. Wiegand. 2012. Overview of the high efficiency video coding (HEVC) standard. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 22, 12 (Dec. 2012), 1649--1668. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Sun, F. Duanmu, Y. Liu, Y. Wang, Y. Ye, H. Shi, and D. Dai. 2018. Multi-path multi-tier 360-degree video streaming in 5G networks. In Proc. of ACM MMSys’18. 162--173. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Tan, R. Weerakkody, M. Mrak, N. Ramzan, V. Baroncini, J. Ohm, and G. Sullivan. 2016. Video quality evaluation methodology and verification testing of HEVC compression performance. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 26, 1 (Jan. 2016), 76--90.Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Thatte, J. Boin, H. Lakshman, and B. Girod. 2016. Depth augmented stereo panorama for cinematic virtual reality with head-motion parallax. In Proc. of IEEE ICME’16. 1--6.Google Scholar
- B. Thomas. 2012. A survey of visual, mixed, and augmented reality gaming. Computers in Entertainment 10, 1 (Oct. 2012), 3. Google ScholarDigital Library
- I. Tosic and P. Frossard. 2009. Low bit-rate compression of omnidirectional images. In Proc. of PCS’09. 1--4. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. Tran, N. Ngoc, C. Bui, M. Pham, and T. Thang. 2017. An evaluation of quality metrics for 360 videos. In Proc. of ICUFN’17. 7--11.Google Scholar
- E. Upenik, M. Rerabek, and T. Ebrahimi. 2016. Testbed for subjective evaluation of omnidirectional visual content. In Proc. of PCS’16. 1--5.Google Scholar
- E. Upenik, M. Rerabek, and T. Ebrahimi. 2017. On the performance of objective metrics for omnidirectional visual content. In Proc. of QoMEX’17. 1--6.Google Scholar
- V. Couture, M. Langer, and S. Roy. 2011. Panoramic stereo video textures. In Proc. of ICCV’11. 1251--1258. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Viitanen, A. Koivula, A. Lemmetti, A. Yla-Outinen, J. Vanne, and T. Hamalainen. 2016. Kvazaar: Open-source HEVC/H.265 encoder. In Proc. of ACM MM’16. 1179--1182. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Vlahovic, M. Suznjevic, and L. Skorin-Kapov. 2018. Subjective assessment of different locomotion techniques in virtual reality environments. In Proc. of QoMEX’18. 1--6.Google Scholar
- Mirjam Vosmeer and Ben Schouten. 2017. Project Orpheus a research study into 360° cinematic VR. In Proc. of ACM TVX’17. 85--90. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Waltemate, F. Hulsmann, T. Pfeiffer, S. Kopp, and M. Botsch. 2015. Realizing a low-latency virtual reality environment for motor learning. In Proc. of ACM VRST’15. 139--147. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. Wang, M. Chan, and W. Ooi. 2015. Wireless multicast for zoomable video streaming. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications 12, 1 (Aug. 2015), Article 5, 23 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. Wang, V. Nguyen, W. Ooi, and M. Chan. 2014. Mixing tile resolutions in tiled video: A perceptual quality assessment. In Proc. of ACM NOSSDAV’14. 25--30. Google ScholarDigital Library
- WebVR. 2017. WebVR: Bringing Virtual Reality to the Web. Home Page. Retrieved April 26, 2018 from https://webvr.info/.Google Scholar
- C. Wu, Z. Tan, Z. Wang, and S. Yang. 2017. A dataset for exploring user behaviors in VR spherical video streaming. In Proc. of ACM MMSys’17. 193--198. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Xiao, S. Wang, C. Zhou, L. Liu, Z. Li, Y. Liu, and S. Chen. 2018. MiniView layout for bandwidth-efficient 360-degree video. In Proc. of ACM MM’18. 914--922. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Xiao, C. Zhou, Y. Liu, and S. Chen. 2017. OpTile: Toward optimal tiling in 360-degree video streaming. In Proc. of ACM MM’17. 708--716. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Xiao, C. Zhou, V. Swaminathan, Y. Liu, and S. Chen. 2018. Bas-360: Exploring spatial and temporal adaptability in 360-degree videos over HTTP/2. In Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM’18. 953--961.Google Scholar
- S. Xiao and F. Wang. 2011. Generation of panoramic view from 360 degree fisheye images based on angular fisheye projection. In Proc. of DCABES’11. 187--191. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Xie, Z. Xu, Y. Ban, X. Zhang, and Z. Guo. 2017. 360ProbDASH: Improving QoE of 360 video streaming using tile-based HTTP adaptive streaming. In Proc. of ACM MM’17. 315--323. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Xie, X. Zhang, and Z. Guo. 2018. CLS: A cross-user learning based system for improving QoE in 360-degree video adaptive streaming. In Proc. of ACM MM’18. 564--572. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Xie, Y. Xu, Q. Qian, Q. Shen, Z. Ma, and W. Zhang. 2018. Modeling the perceptual impact of viewport adaptation for immersive video. In Proc. of IEEE SCAS’18. 1--5.Google Scholar
- X. Xie and X. Zhang. 2017. POI360: Panoramic mobile video telephony over LTE cellular networks. In Proc. of CoNEXT’17. 336--349. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. Xiong and K. Pulli. 2010. Color matching for high-quality panoramic images on mobile phones. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics 56, 4 (Nov. 2010), 2592--2600. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Xu, Y. Song, J. Wang, M. Qiao, L. Huo, and Z. Wang. 2018. Predicting head movement in panoramic video: A deep reinforcement learning approach. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 14, 8, 1--15.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Y. Xu, Y. Dong, J. Wu, Z. Sun, Z. Shi, J. Yu, and S. Gao. 2018. Gaze prediction in dynamic 360 immersive videos. In Proc. of IEEE CVPR’18. 5333--5342.Google Scholar
- Y. Sanchez, R. Skupin, and T. Schierl. 2015. Compressed domain video processing for tile based panoramic streaming using SHVC. In Proc. of ACM ImmersiveMe’15. 13--18. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Yahia, Y. Le Louedec, G. Simon, and L. Nuaymi. 2018. HTTP/2-based streaming solutions for tiled omnidirectional videos. In Proc. of IEEE ISM’18. 89--96.Google Scholar
- S. Yen, C. Fan, and C. Hsu. 2019. Streaming 360° videos to head-mounted virtual reality using DASH over QUIC transport protocol. In Proc. of PV’19. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Youvalari, A. Aminlou, M. Hannuksela, and M. Gabbouj. 2016. Efficient coding of 360-degree pseudo-cylindrical panoramic video for virtual reality applications. In Proc. of IEEE ISM’16. 525--528.Google Scholar
- V. Zakharchenko, K. Choi, and J. Park. 2016. Quality metric for spherical panoramic video. In Proc. of SPIE OP’16. Article 99700C, 9 pages.Google Scholar
- A. Zare, A. Aminlou, and M. Hannuksela. 2018. 6K effective resolution with 4K HEVC decoding capability for OMAF-compliant 360 video streaming. In Proc. of PV’18. 72--77. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Zare, A. Aminlou, M. Hannuksela, and M. Gabbouj. 2016. HEVC-compliant tile-based streaming of panoramic video for virtual reality applications. In Proc. of ACM MM’16. 601--605. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Zhang, S. Amin, and C. Westphal. 2017. VR video conferencing over named data networks. In Proc. of ACM VR/AR Network’17. 7--12. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Z. Zhang, Y. Xu, J. Yu, and S. Gao. 2018. Saliency detection in 360 videos. In Proc. of ACM ECCV’18.Google Scholar
- C. Zhou, Z. Li, and Y. Liu. 2017. A measurement study of oculus 360 degree video streaming. In Proc. of ACM MMSys’17. 27--37. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Zink, R. Sitaraman, and K. Nahrstedt. 2019. Scalable 360° video stream delivery: Challenges, solutions, and opportunities. Proceedings of the IEEE 107, 4 (April 2019), 639--650.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Zomet, A. Levin, S. Peleg, and Y. Weiss. 2006. Seamless image stitching by minimizing false edges. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 15, 4 (April 2006), 969--977. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Yao, C. Fan, and C. Hsu. 2019. Towards quality-of-experience models for watching 360° videos in head-mounted virtual reality. In Proc. of QoMEX'19. 1--3.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- A Survey on 360° Video Streaming: Acquisition, Transmission, and Display
Recommendations
Power Evaluation of 360 VR Video Streaming on Head Mounted Display Devices
NOSSDAV'17: Proceedings of the 27th Workshop on Network and Operating Systems Support for Digital Audio and VideoVirtual reality (VR) video streaming with 360-degree views has become a trending video application recently. While providing the users with immersive video viewing experiences, the 360 video streaming introduces significantly higher overhead than the ...
A measurement study of YouTube 360° live video streaming
NOSSDAV '19: Proceedings of the 29th ACM Workshop on Network and Operating Systems Support for Digital Audio and Video360° live video streaming is becoming increasingly popular. While providing viewers with enriched experience, 360° live video streaming is challenging to achieve since it requires a significantly higher bandwidth and a powerful computation ...
A survey on 360-degree video: Coding, quality of experience and streaming
AbstractThe commercialization of Virtual Reality (VR) headsets has made immersive and 360-degree video streaming the subject of intense interest in the industry and research communities. While the basic principles of video streaming are the ...
Comments