Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Small Business Economics 1/2018

24-08-2017

A social capital approach to the development of sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems: an explorative study

Authors: Christina Theodoraki, Karim Messeghem, Mark P. Rice

Published in: Small Business Economics | Issue 1/2018

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The entrepreneurial ecosystem, an emerging and developing theoretical stream, has the potential to expand our understanding of entrepreneurship. In previous research, this concept has been studied from the university perspective, but it has not yet been introduced in the field of entrepreneurial support. Additionally, the growing number of university business incubators has led to increasing research interest in the entrepreneurial support field. This research project seeks to develop a more robust understanding of sustainable university-based entrepreneurial ecosystems through an in-depth analysis of an essential entrepreneurial support element: the university business incubator. Our exploratory research study draws on 48 face-to-face interviews with key members of university-based entrepreneurial ecosystems to explore the operation of three cases through the lens of social capital theory. Our analysis suggests that all three social capital dimensions are relevant to the effective functioning of the university-based entrepreneurial ecosystem and contribute to its sustainability: applying the structural dimension of social capital enhances access to resources; addressing the cognitive dimension strengthens relationships among ecosystem members; and investing in the relational dimension enhances complementarity and trust while the ecosystem evolves. Thus, the interaction of these dimensions may further contribute to the sustainability of the university-based entrepreneurial ecosystem. Enhancing the development and application of the three social capital dimensions as an aspect of proactive management of the entrepreneurship ecosystem has the potential to improve outcomes for ecosystem members.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Ács, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National systems of entrepreneurship: measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43(3), 476–494.CrossRef Ács, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National systems of entrepreneurship: measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43(3), 476–494.CrossRef
go back to reference Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306–333.CrossRef Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306–333.CrossRef
go back to reference Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2016). Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: re-examining technology S-curves. Strategic Management Journal, 37(4), 625–648.CrossRef Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2016). Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: re-examining technology S-curves. Strategic Management Journal, 37(4), 625–648.CrossRef
go back to reference Adner, R., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. (2013). Collaboration and competition in business ecosystems. Bingley: Emerald.CrossRef Adner, R., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. (2013). Collaboration and competition in business ecosystems. Bingley: Emerald.CrossRef
go back to reference Aernoudt, R. (2004). Incubators: tool for entrepreneurship? Small Business Economics, 23(2), 127–135.CrossRef Aernoudt, R. (2004). Incubators: tool for entrepreneurship? Small Business Economics, 23(2), 127–135.CrossRef
go back to reference Ahmad, A. J., & Ingle, S. (2011). Relationships matter: case study of a university campus incubator. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 17(6), 626–644.CrossRef Ahmad, A. J., & Ingle, S. (2011). Relationships matter: case study of a university campus incubator. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 17(6), 626–644.CrossRef
go back to reference Barbero, J. L., Casillas, J. C., Wright, M., & Ramos Garcia, A. R. (2014). Do different types of incubators produce different types of innovations? Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(2), 151–168.CrossRef Barbero, J. L., Casillas, J. C., Wright, M., & Ramos Garcia, A. R. (2014). Do different types of incubators produce different types of innovations? Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(2), 151–168.CrossRef
go back to reference Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. Los Angeles: Sage Publications Limited. Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. Los Angeles: Sage Publications Limited.
go back to reference Ben Letaifa, S. (2013). A methodology for ecosystem creation: how organizations can shift from supply chain to ecosystems. In S. Ben Letaifa, A. Gratacap, & T. Isckia (Eds.), Understanding business ecosystems. How firms succeed in the new world of conveergence (pp. 86–95). Brussels: De Boeck. Ben Letaifa, S. (2013). A methodology for ecosystem creation: how organizations can shift from supply chain to ecosystems. In S. Ben Letaifa, A. Gratacap, & T. Isckia (Eds.), Understanding business ecosystems. How firms succeed in the new world of conveergence (pp. 86–95). Brussels: De Boeck.
go back to reference Ben Letaifa, S., & Rabeau, Y. (2013). Too close to collaborate? How geographic proximity could impede entrepreneurship and innovation. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 2071–2078.CrossRef Ben Letaifa, S., & Rabeau, Y. (2013). Too close to collaborate? How geographic proximity could impede entrepreneurship and innovation. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 2071–2078.CrossRef
go back to reference Bergek, A., & Norrman, C. (2008). Incubator best practice: a framework. Technovation, 28(1–2), 20–28.CrossRef Bergek, A., & Norrman, C. (2008). Incubator best practice: a framework. Technovation, 28(1–2), 20–28.CrossRef
go back to reference Bøllingtoft, A., & Ulhøi, J. P. (2005). The networked business incubator—leveraging entrepreneurial agency? Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 265–290.CrossRef Bøllingtoft, A., & Ulhøi, J. P. (2005). The networked business incubator—leveraging entrepreneurial agency? Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 265–290.CrossRef
go back to reference Burt, R. S. (1992). The social structure of competition. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: structure, form, and action (pp. 57–91). Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press. Burt, R. S. (1992). The social structure of competition. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: structure, form, and action (pp. 57–91). Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.
go back to reference Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Bruneel, J., & Mahajan, A. (2014). Creating value in ecosystems: crossing the chasm between knowledge and business ecosystems. Research Policy, 43(7), 1164–1176.CrossRef Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Bruneel, J., & Mahajan, A. (2014). Creating value in ecosystems: crossing the chasm between knowledge and business ecosystems. Research Policy, 43(7), 1164–1176.CrossRef
go back to reference Cohen, B. (2006). Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(1), 1–14.CrossRef Cohen, B. (2006). Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(1), 1–14.CrossRef
go back to reference Cohen, B., & Winn, M. I. (2007). Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 29–49.CrossRef Cohen, B., & Winn, M. I. (2007). Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 29–49.CrossRef
go back to reference Colombo, M. G., & Delmastro, M. (2002). How effective are technology incubators? Research Policy, 31(7), 1103–1122.CrossRef Colombo, M. G., & Delmastro, M. (2002). How effective are technology incubators? Research Policy, 31(7), 1103–1122.CrossRef
go back to reference Dess, G. G., Lumpkin, G. T., & Covin, J. G. (1997). Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: tests of contingency and configurational models. Strategic Management Journal, 18(9), 677–695.CrossRef Dess, G. G., Lumpkin, G. T., & Covin, J. G. (1997). Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: tests of contingency and configurational models. Strategic Management Journal, 18(9), 677–695.CrossRef
go back to reference Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
go back to reference Etzkowitz, H. (2002). Incubation of incubators: innovation as a triple helix of university-industry-government networks. Science and Public Policy, 29(2), 115–128.CrossRef Etzkowitz, H. (2002). Incubation of incubators: innovation as a triple helix of university-industry-government networks. Science and Public Policy, 29(2), 115–128.CrossRef
go back to reference Fang, S.-C., Tsai, F.-S., & Lin, J. L. (2010). Leveraging tenant-incubator social capital for organizational learning and performance in incubation programme. International Small Business Journal, 28(1), 90–113.CrossRef Fang, S.-C., Tsai, F.-S., & Lin, J. L. (2010). Leveraging tenant-incubator social capital for organizational learning and performance in incubation programme. International Small Business Journal, 28(1), 90–113.CrossRef
go back to reference Gilbert, L. S., Jackson, K., & di Gregorio, S. (2014). Tools for analyzing qualitative data: the history and relevance of qualitative data analysis software. In J. M. Sector, M. D. Merril, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 221–236). New York: Springer.CrossRef Gilbert, L. S., Jackson, K., & di Gregorio, S. (2014). Tools for analyzing qualitative data: the history and relevance of qualitative data analysis software. In J. M. Sector, M. D. Merril, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 221–236). New York: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.CrossRef Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.CrossRef
go back to reference Grimaldi, R., & Grandi, A. (2005). Business incubators and new venture creation: an assessment of incubating models. Technovation, 25(2), 111–121.CrossRef Grimaldi, R., & Grandi, A. (2005). Business incubators and new venture creation: an assessment of incubating models. Technovation, 25(2), 111–121.CrossRef
go back to reference Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2011). 30 years after Bayh–Dole: reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1045–1057.CrossRef Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2011). 30 years after Bayh–Dole: reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1045–1057.CrossRef
go back to reference Hackett, S. M., & Dilts, D. M. (2004a). A systematic review of business incubation research. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), 55–82.CrossRef Hackett, S. M., & Dilts, D. M. (2004a). A systematic review of business incubation research. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), 55–82.CrossRef
go back to reference Hackett, S. M., & Dilts, D. M. (2004b). A real options-driven theory of business incubation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), 41–54.CrossRef Hackett, S. M., & Dilts, D. M. (2004b). A real options-driven theory of business incubation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), 41–54.CrossRef
go back to reference Hackett, S. M., & Dilts, D. M. (2008). Inside the black box of business incubation: study B—scale assessment, model refinement, and incubation outcomes. Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(5), 439–471.CrossRef Hackett, S. M., & Dilts, D. M. (2008). Inside the black box of business incubation: study B—scale assessment, model refinement, and incubation outcomes. Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(5), 439–471.CrossRef
go back to reference Hansen, M. T., Chesbrough, H. W., Nohria, N., & Sull, D. N. (2000). Networked incubators. Hothouses of the new economy. Harvard Business Review, 78(5), 74–84 199. Hansen, M. T., Chesbrough, H. W., Nohria, N., & Sull, D. N. (2000). Networked incubators. Hothouses of the new economy. Harvard Business Review, 78(5), 74–84 199.
go back to reference Hayter, C. S. (2016). A trajectory of early-stage spinoff success: the role of knowledge intermediaries within an entrepreneurial university ecosystem. Small Business Economics, 47(3), 633–656.CrossRef Hayter, C. S. (2016). A trajectory of early-stage spinoff success: the role of knowledge intermediaries within an entrepreneurial university ecosystem. Small Business Economics, 47(3), 633–656.CrossRef
go back to reference Hoang, H., & Antoncic, B. (2003). Network-based research in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 165–187.CrossRef Hoang, H., & Antoncic, B. (2003). Network-based research in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 165–187.CrossRef
go back to reference Hobbs, K. G., Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2017). Science and technology parks: an annotated and analytical literature review. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(4), 957–976.CrossRef Hobbs, K. G., Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2017). Science and technology parks: an annotated and analytical literature review. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(4), 957–976.CrossRef
go back to reference Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review, 82(3), 68–78 126. Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review, 82(3), 68–78 126.
go back to reference Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2005). Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 146–165.CrossRef Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2005). Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 146–165.CrossRef
go back to reference Isenberg, D. (2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. Dublin: Institute of International European Affairs. Isenberg, D. (2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. Dublin: Institute of International European Affairs.
go back to reference Kale, P., Singh, H., & Perlmutter, H. (2000). Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 217–237.CrossRef Kale, P., Singh, H., & Perlmutter, H. (2000). Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 217–237.CrossRef
go back to reference Klofsten, M., Bank, N., & Bienkowska, D. (2016). The role of incubators in supporting sustainable entrepreneurship. In Work Package (Vol. 3). Linköping: SHIFT. Klofsten, M., Bank, N., & Bienkowska, D. (2016). The role of incubators in supporting sustainable entrepreneurship. In Work Package (Vol. 3). Linköping: SHIFT.
go back to reference Knopp, L. (2012). State of the business incubation industry. Athens: National Business Incubation Association (NBIA) Publicatons. Knopp, L. (2012). State of the business incubation industry. Athens: National Business Incubation Association (NBIA) Publicatons.
go back to reference Lado, A. A., Dant, R. R., & Tekleab, A. G. (2008). Trust-opportunism paradox, relationalism, and performance in interfirm relationships: evidence from the retail industry. Strategic Management Journal, 29(4), 401–423.CrossRef Lado, A. A., Dant, R. R., & Tekleab, A. G. (2008). Trust-opportunism paradox, relationalism, and performance in interfirm relationships: evidence from the retail industry. Strategic Management Journal, 29(4), 401–423.CrossRef
go back to reference Lasrado, V., Sivo, S., Ford, C., O’Neal, T., & Garibay, I. (2016). Do graduated university incubator firms benefit from their relationship with university incubators? Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(2), 205–219.CrossRef Lasrado, V., Sivo, S., Ford, C., O’Neal, T., & Garibay, I. (2016). Do graduated university incubator firms benefit from their relationship with university incubators? Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(2), 205–219.CrossRef
go back to reference Lee, S. S., & Osteryoung, J. S. (2004). A comparison of critical success factors for effective operations of university business incubators in the United States and Korea. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(4), 418–426.CrossRef Lee, S. S., & Osteryoung, J. S. (2004). A comparison of critical success factors for effective operations of university business incubators in the United States and Korea. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(4), 418–426.CrossRef
go back to reference Marshall, M. N. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice, 13(6), 522–525.CrossRef Marshall, M. N. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice, 13(6), 522–525.CrossRef
go back to reference Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate? Educational Researcher, 17(2), 13–17.CrossRef Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate? Educational Researcher, 17(2), 13–17.CrossRef
go back to reference McAdam, M., & Marlow, S. (2008). A preliminary investigation into networking activities within the university incubator. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 14(4), 219–241.CrossRef McAdam, M., & Marlow, S. (2008). A preliminary investigation into networking activities within the university incubator. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 14(4), 219–241.CrossRef
go back to reference Mian, S. A. (1994). US university-sponsored technology incubators: an overview of management, policies and performance. Technovation, 14(8), 515–528.CrossRef Mian, S. A. (1994). US university-sponsored technology incubators: an overview of management, policies and performance. Technovation, 14(8), 515–528.CrossRef
go back to reference Mian, S. A. (1996). The university business incubator: a strategy for developing new research/technology-based firms. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 7(2), 191–208.CrossRef Mian, S. A. (1996). The university business incubator: a strategy for developing new research/technology-based firms. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 7(2), 191–208.CrossRef
go back to reference Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2003). Analyse des données qualitatives. Brussels: de Boeck Supérieur. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2003). Analyse des données qualitatives. Brussels: de Boeck Supérieur.
go back to reference Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75–86. Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75–86.
go back to reference Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.
go back to reference Neck, H. M., Meyer, G. D., Cohen, B., & Corbett, A. C. (2004). An entrepreneurial system view of new venture creation. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(2), 190–208.CrossRef Neck, H. M., Meyer, G. D., Cohen, B., & Corbett, A. C. (2004). An entrepreneurial system view of new venture creation. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(2), 190–208.CrossRef
go back to reference Patton, D. (2014). Realising potential: the impact of business incubation on the absorptive capacity of new technology-based firms. International Small Business Journal, 32(8), 897–917.CrossRef Patton, D. (2014). Realising potential: the impact of business incubation on the absorptive capacity of new technology-based firms. International Small Business Journal, 32(8), 897–917.CrossRef
go back to reference Peters, L., Rice, M., & Sundararajan, M. (2004). The role of incubators in the entrepreneurial process. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), 83–91.CrossRef Peters, L., Rice, M., & Sundararajan, M. (2004). The role of incubators in the entrepreneurial process. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), 83–91.CrossRef
go back to reference Phan, P. H., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2005). Science parks and incubators: observations, synthesis and future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 165–182.CrossRef Phan, P. H., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2005). Science parks and incubators: observations, synthesis and future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 165–182.CrossRef
go back to reference Phillips, R. G. (2002). Technology business incubators: how effective as technology transfer mechanisms? Technology in Society, 24(3), 299–316.CrossRef Phillips, R. G. (2002). Technology business incubators: how effective as technology transfer mechanisms? Technology in Society, 24(3), 299–316.CrossRef
go back to reference Pierce, L. (2009). Big losses in ecosystem niches: how core firm decisions drive complementary product shakeouts. Strategic Management Journal, 30(3), 323–347.CrossRef Pierce, L. (2009). Big losses in ecosystem niches: how core firm decisions drive complementary product shakeouts. Strategic Management Journal, 30(3), 323–347.CrossRef
go back to reference Regele, M. D., & Neck, H. M. (2012). The entrepreneurship education subecosystem in the United States: opportunities to increase entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 23(2), 25–47. Regele, M. D., & Neck, H. M. (2012). The entrepreneurship education subecosystem in the United States: opportunities to increase entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 23(2), 25–47.
go back to reference Rice, M. P. (2002). Co-production of business assistance in business incubators: an exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(2), 163–187.CrossRef Rice, M. P. (2002). Co-production of business assistance in business incubators: an exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(2), 163–187.CrossRef
go back to reference Rice, M. P., & Matthews, J. B. (1995). Growing new ventures, creating new jobs. Westport, CT: Quorum. Rice, M. P., & Matthews, J. B. (1995). Growing new ventures, creating new jobs. Westport, CT: Quorum.
go back to reference Rice, M. P., Fetters, M. L., & Greene, P. G. (2014). University-based entrepreneurship ecosystems: a global study of six educational institutions. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 18(5/6), 481–501.CrossRef Rice, M. P., Fetters, M. L., & Greene, P. G. (2014). University-based entrepreneurship ecosystems: a global study of six educational institutions. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 18(5/6), 481–501.CrossRef
go back to reference Rothaermel, F. T., & Thursby, M. (2005). Incubator firm failure or graduation? Research Policy, 34(7), 1076–1090.CrossRef Rothaermel, F. T., & Thursby, M. (2005). Incubator firm failure or graduation? Research Policy, 34(7), 1076–1090.CrossRef
go back to reference Schwartz, M., & Hornych, C. (2008). Specialization as strategy for business incubators: an assessment of the Central German Multimedia Center. Technovation, 28(7), 436–449.CrossRef Schwartz, M., & Hornych, C. (2008). Specialization as strategy for business incubators: an assessment of the Central German Multimedia Center. Technovation, 28(7), 436–449.CrossRef
go back to reference Schwartz, M., & Hornych, C. (2010). Cooperation patterns of incubator firms and the impact of incubator specialization: empirical evidence from Germany. Technovation, 30(9–10), 485–495.CrossRef Schwartz, M., & Hornych, C. (2010). Cooperation patterns of incubator firms and the impact of incubator specialization: empirical evidence from Germany. Technovation, 30(9–10), 485–495.CrossRef
go back to reference Schwartz, M., & Hornych, C. (2012). Specialisation versus diversification: perceived benefits of different business incubation models. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 15(3), 177–197.CrossRef Schwartz, M., & Hornych, C. (2012). Specialisation versus diversification: perceived benefits of different business incubation models. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 15(3), 177–197.CrossRef
go back to reference Simsek, Z., Lubatkin, M. H., & Floyd, S. W. (2003). Inter-firm networks and entrepreneurial behavior: a structural embeddedness perspective. Journal of Management, 29(3), 427–442.CrossRef Simsek, Z., Lubatkin, M. H., & Floyd, S. W. (2003). Inter-firm networks and entrepreneurial behavior: a structural embeddedness perspective. Journal of Management, 29(3), 427–442.CrossRef
go back to reference Soetanto, D. (2004). Research of the role of the incubation policy in helping the growth of new technology based-firm. Lisbon: Globelics Academy. Soetanto, D. (2004). Research of the role of the incubation policy in helping the growth of new technology based-firm. Lisbon: Globelics Academy.
go back to reference Soetanto, D., & van Geenhuizen, M. (2015). Getting the right balance: university networks’ influence on spin-offs’ attraction of funding for innovation. Technovation, 36–37, 26–38.CrossRef Soetanto, D., & van Geenhuizen, M. (2015). Getting the right balance: university networks’ influence on spin-offs’ attraction of funding for innovation. Technovation, 36–37, 26–38.CrossRef
go back to reference Somsuk, N., & Laosirihongthong, T. (2014). A fuzzy AHP to prioritize enabling factors for strategic management of university business incubators: resource-based view. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 85, 198–210.CrossRef Somsuk, N., & Laosirihongthong, T. (2014). A fuzzy AHP to prioritize enabling factors for strategic management of university business incubators: resource-based view. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 85, 198–210.CrossRef
go back to reference Somsuk, N., Laosirihongthong, T., & McLean, M. W. (2012). Strategic management of university business incubators (UBIs): resource-based view (RBV) theory. In IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation & Technology (ICMIT) (pp. 611–618). Piscataway: IEEE Publications. Somsuk, N., Laosirihongthong, T., & McLean, M. W. (2012). Strategic management of university business incubators (UBIs): resource-based view (RBV) theory. In IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation & Technology (ICMIT) (pp. 611–618). Piscataway: IEEE Publications.
go back to reference Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49–72.CrossRef Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49–72.CrossRef
go back to reference Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: a sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759–1769.CrossRef Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: a sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759–1769.CrossRef
go back to reference Stangler, D., & Bell-Masterson, J. (2015). Measuring an entrepreneurial ecosystem. Kansas City: Kauffman Foundation Research Series on City, Metro, and Regional Entrepreneurship. Stangler, D., & Bell-Masterson, J. (2015). Measuring an entrepreneurial ecosystem. Kansas City: Kauffman Foundation Research Series on City, Metro, and Regional Entrepreneurship.
go back to reference Sternberg, R. (2014). Success factors of university-spin-offs: regional government support programs versus regional environment. Technovation, 34(3), 137–148.CrossRef Sternberg, R. (2014). Success factors of university-spin-offs: regional government support programs versus regional environment. Technovation, 34(3), 137–148.CrossRef
go back to reference Thomas, L. D., & Autio, E. (2013). The fifth facet: the ecosystem as an organizational field. In Proceeding of the Conference on DRUID Society: Innovation and Entrepreneurship Group Working Papers. Copenhagen: CBS. Thomas, L. D., & Autio, E. (2013). The fifth facet: the ecosystem as an organizational field. In Proceeding of the Conference on DRUID Society: Innovation and Entrepreneurship Group Working Papers. Copenhagen: CBS.
go back to reference Tötterman, H., & Sten, J. (2005). Start-ups. International Small Business Journal, 23(5), 487–511.CrossRef Tötterman, H., & Sten, J. (2005). Start-ups. International Small Business Journal, 23(5), 487–511.CrossRef
go back to reference von Zedtwitz, M., & Grimaldi, R. (2006). Are service profiles incubator-specific? Results from an empirical investigation in Italy. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(4), 459–468.CrossRef von Zedtwitz, M., & Grimaldi, R. (2006). Are service profiles incubator-specific? Results from an empirical investigation in Italy. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(4), 459–468.CrossRef
go back to reference Yang, C.-H., Motohashi, K., & Chen, J.-R. (2009). Are new technology-based firms located on science parks really more innovative? Research Policy, 38(1), 77–85.CrossRef Yang, C.-H., Motohashi, K., & Chen, J.-R. (2009). Are new technology-based firms located on science parks really more innovative? Research Policy, 38(1), 77–85.CrossRef
go back to reference Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Metadata
Title
A social capital approach to the development of sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems: an explorative study
Authors
Christina Theodoraki
Karim Messeghem
Mark P. Rice
Publication date
24-08-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Small Business Economics / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0921-898X
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0913
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9924-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Small Business Economics 1/2018 Go to the issue