Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education 5/2019

30-11-2018

Assisting teachers’ understanding of student learning in technology

Author: Wendy Fox-Turnbull

Published in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education | Issue 5/2019

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This article describes a study undertaken in New Zealand, England and Sweden and is based on the use of a tool developed by the researcher as a professional development and teaching tool in technology education for teachers of students between four and six years of age. The aim of the research was to investigate teachers’ views of the effectiveness of the tool designed to deepening their understandings of technology content and pedagogical content knowledge. The tool, technology observations and conversation framework (TOCF) was designed to guide teachers’ interactions with and observations of young children when learning technology with the aim of developing teacher insight into their own understanding of technology and how students learn technology. The tool was developed using the building of learning power theory to facilitate the identification of key dispositions and attitudes within four aspects of learning and across five pre-determined behaviours relevant to technology education. Qualitative research methods were used to investigate teachers’ interaction with the TOCF by observing their use of it, and interviewing them about their perceived developed understanding of technology content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). The initial purpose of the framework, presented to the teachers prior to teaching, was to guide interactions with students to assist this development and subsequently assist their ability to teach technology effectively and give specific feedback to students in technology education. The study found that teachers felt that they gained a deeper understanding of technology education and their understanding of students’ learning in technology also developed. This article presents the final framework and teachers’ views on how they were assisted by the framework. The study offers an international perspective on ways to broaden and deepen students’ understanding in technological literacy through the development of teacher content knowledge and PCK and contributes significantly to the field of formative assessment in technology education.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Alexander, R. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (4th ed.). Cambridge: Dialogos. Alexander, R. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (4th ed.). Cambridge: Dialogos.
go back to reference Bellanca, J., & Brandt, R. (Eds.). (2010). 21st century skills: rethinking how students learn. Bloomington: Solution Tree Press. Bellanca, J., & Brandt, R. (Eds.). (2010). 21st century skills: rethinking how students learn. Bloomington: Solution Tree Press.
go back to reference Clarke, S. (2014). Outstanding formative assessment: culture and practice. London: Hodder Education. Clarke, S. (2014). Outstanding formative assessment: culture and practice. London: Hodder Education.
go back to reference Claxton, G., & Carr, M. (2010). A framework for teaching learning:the dynamics of disposition. Early Years: An International Journal, 24(1), 87–97.CrossRef Claxton, G., & Carr, M. (2010). A framework for teaching learning:the dynamics of disposition. Early Years: An International Journal, 24(1), 87–97.CrossRef
go back to reference Claxton, G., Chambers, M., Powell, G., & Lucas, B. (2013). The learning powered school: Pioneering 21st century education. Bristol: Bristol TLO Limited. Claxton, G., Chambers, M., Powell, G., & Lucas, B. (2013). The learning powered school: Pioneering 21st century education. Bristol: Bristol TLO Limited.
go back to reference Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education. London: Routledge. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
go back to reference Compton, V., & France, B. (2007). Towards a new technological literacy: Curriculum development with a difference. Curriculum Matters, 3, 158–175. Compton, V., & France, B. (2007). Towards a new technological literacy: Curriculum development with a difference. Curriculum Matters, 3, 158–175.
go back to reference Compton, V., & Harwood, C. (2005). Progression in technology education in New Zealand: Components of practice as a way forward. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 15, 253–287.CrossRef Compton, V., & Harwood, C. (2005). Progression in technology education in New Zealand: Components of practice as a way forward. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 15, 253–287.CrossRef
go back to reference Cross, A. (2011). In search of a pedagogy for primary design and technology education. In C. Benson & L. Lund (Eds.), International handbook of primary technology education (Vol. 7, pp. 167–180). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRef Cross, A. (2011). In search of a pedagogy for primary design and technology education. In C. Benson & L. Lund (Eds.), International handbook of primary technology education (Vol. 7, pp. 167–180). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRef
go back to reference Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper-Perennial. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper-Perennial.
go back to reference de Vries, M. (2017). Philosophy of technology: Themes and topics. In M. de Vries (Ed.), Handbook of technology education (pp. 7–16). Cham: Springer.CrossRef de Vries, M. (2017). Philosophy of technology: Themes and topics. In M. de Vries (Ed.), Handbook of technology education (pp. 7–16). Cham: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference Doyle, A., Seery, N., Gumaelius, L., Donal Canty, D., & Hartell, E. (2018). Reconceptualising PCK research in D&T education: Proposing a methodological framework to investigate enacted practice. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, pp. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9456-1. Doyle, A., Seery, N., Gumaelius, L., Donal Canty, D., & Hartell, E. (2018). Reconceptualising PCK research in D&T education: Proposing a methodological framework to investigate enacted practice. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, pp. 1–19. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10798-018-9456-1.
go back to reference Fox-Turnbull, W. (2006). The influences of teacher knowledge and authentic formative assessment on student learning in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 16, 53–77.CrossRef Fox-Turnbull, W. (2006). The influences of teacher knowledge and authentic formative assessment on student learning in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 16, 53–77.CrossRef
go back to reference Fox-Turnbull, W. (2012). Funds of knowledge in technology education. Paper presented at the PATT 26 Stockholm, Sweden. Fox-Turnbull, W. (2012). Funds of knowledge in technology education. Paper presented at the PATT 26 Stockholm, Sweden.
go back to reference Fox-Turnbull, W. (2013). Themes of conversation in technology education. In: Paper presented at the International Teachnology and Engineering Educators’ Assocation Conference, Columbus. Fox-Turnbull, W. (2013). Themes of conversation in technology education. In: Paper presented at the International Teachnology and Engineering Educators’ Assocation Conference, Columbus.
go back to reference Fox-Turnbull, W. (2016). The nature of primary students’ conversation in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(1), 21–41.CrossRef Fox-Turnbull, W. (2016). The nature of primary students’ conversation in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(1), 21–41.CrossRef
go back to reference González, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (Eds.). (2005). Funds of knowledge (1st ed. Vol. 2009 Reprint). New York: Routledge. González, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (Eds.). (2005). Funds of knowledge (1st ed. Vol. 2009 Reprint). New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Hope, J. (2018). Mastering primary design and technology. London: Bloomsbury Academic. Hope, J. (2018). Mastering primary design and technology. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
go back to reference Hulten, M., & Bjorkholm, E. (2016). Epistemic habits: primary school teachers’ development of pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(3), 335–351.CrossRef Hulten, M., & Bjorkholm, E. (2016). Epistemic habits: primary school teachers’ development of pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(3), 335–351.CrossRef
go back to reference Jones, A. (2009). Towards an articluation of students making progress in learning technological concepts and processes. In A. Jones & M. de Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRef Jones, A. (2009). Towards an articluation of students making progress in learning technological concepts and processes. In A. Jones & M. de Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRef
go back to reference Kimbell, R. (1997). Assessing technology international trends in curriculum and assessment. Buckingham: Open University Press. Kimbell, R. (1997). Assessing technology international trends in curriculum and assessment. Buckingham: Open University Press.
go back to reference Kimbell, R., Stables, K., & Green, R. (1996). Understanding practice in design and technology. Buckingham: Open University Press. Kimbell, R., Stables, K., & Green, R. (1996). Understanding practice in design and technology. Buckingham: Open University Press.
go back to reference Masson, A.-L., Klop, T., & Osseweijer, P. (2016). An analysis of the impact of student-scientist interaction in a technology design activity, using the expectancy-value model of achievement related choice. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(1), 81–104.CrossRef Masson, A.-L., Klop, T., & Osseweijer, P. (2016). An analysis of the impact of student-scientist interaction in a technology design activity, using the expectancy-value model of achievement related choice. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(1), 81–104.CrossRef
go back to reference Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge-talk amongst teachers and learners. Bristol: Multilingual Matters Ltd. Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge-talk amongst teachers and learners. Bristol: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
go back to reference Mercer, N., & Dawes, L. (2008). The value of exploratory talk. In N. Mercer & S. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Exploring talk in school (pp. 55–71). London: Sage Publications Ltd. Mercer, N., & Dawes, L. (2008). The value of exploratory talk. In N. Mercer & S. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Exploring talk in school (pp. 55–71). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
go back to reference Mercer, N., & Hodgkinson, S. (Eds.). (2008). Exploring talk in school. London: Sage Publications Ltd. Mercer, N., & Hodgkinson, S. (Eds.). (2008). Exploring talk in school. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
go back to reference Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking—a sociocultural approach. Oxon: Routledge.CrossRef Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking—a sociocultural approach. Oxon: Routledge.CrossRef
go back to reference Ministry of Education. (1996). Te Whāriki early childhood curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media. Ministry of Education. (1996). Te Whāriki early childhood curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.
go back to reference Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media. Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.
go back to reference Moreland, J., & Jones, A. (2000). Emerging assessment practices in an emergent curriculum: Implications for technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10(3), 283–305.CrossRef Moreland, J., & Jones, A. (2000). Emerging assessment practices in an emergent curriculum: Implications for technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10(3), 283–305.CrossRef
go back to reference Moreland, J., Jones, A., & Chambers, M. (2001). Enhancing student learning in technology through teacher technological literacy. Wellington: University of Waikato. Moreland, J., Jones, A., & Chambers, M. (2001). Enhancing student learning in technology through teacher technological literacy. Wellington: University of Waikato.
go back to reference Neuman, W. L. (2011). Social research methods: Qualitiative and quantitative approaches. Boston: Pearson. Neuman, W. L. (2011). Social research methods: Qualitiative and quantitative approaches. Boston: Pearson.
go back to reference Osborne, J. (2009). Learning to argue, aruing to learn. In A. Jones & M. De Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 431–444). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRef Osborne, J. (2009). Learning to argue, aruing to learn. In A. Jones & M. De Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 431–444). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRef
go back to reference Pellergrino, J. W. (2002). How people learn: contributions to framing a research agenda for technology education (Vol. 2). Gold Coast: Centre for Technology Education Research. Pellergrino, J. W. (2002). How people learn: contributions to framing a research agenda for technology education (Vol. 2). Gold Coast: Centre for Technology Education Research.
go back to reference Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., McNaughton Nicholls, C., & Ormston, R. (Eds.). (2014). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage Publications Ltd. Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., McNaughton Nicholls, C., & Ormston, R. (Eds.). (2014). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
go back to reference Rohaan, E. (2009). Testing teacher knowledge for technology teaching in primary schools. Eindhoven: Eindhoven University of Technology Library. Rohaan, E. (2009). Testing teacher knowledge for technology teaching in primary schools. Eindhoven: Eindhoven University of Technology Library.
go back to reference Runco, M. A. (2014). Creativity: theories and themes: Research, development, and practice (2.th ed.). London: Academic Press Elsevier. Runco, M. A. (2014). Creativity: theories and themes: Research, development, and practice (2.th ed.). London: Academic Press Elsevier.
go back to reference Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 158–176.CrossRef Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 158–176.CrossRef
go back to reference Shields, C., & Edwards, M. (2005). Dialogue is not just talk- a new ground for educational leadership. New York: Peter Lang Publishing Inc. Shields, C., & Edwards, M. (2005). Dialogue is not just talk- a new ground for educational leadership. New York: Peter Lang Publishing Inc.
go back to reference Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.CrossRef Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.CrossRef
go back to reference Snape, P., & Fox-Turnbull, W. (2011). Twenty-first century learning and technology education nexus. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 34, 149–161. Snape, P., & Fox-Turnbull, W. (2011). Twenty-first century learning and technology education nexus. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 34, 149–161.
go back to reference Spendlove, D. (2015). Developing a deeper understanding of design. In P. J. Williams, A. Jones, & C. Bunting (Eds.), The future of technology education: Contemporary issues in technology education series. Singapore: Springer. Spendlove, D. (2015). Developing a deeper understanding of design. In P. J. Williams, A. Jones, & C. Bunting (Eds.), The future of technology education: Contemporary issues in technology education series. Singapore: Springer.
go back to reference Turnbull, W. (2002). The place of authenticity in technology in the New Zealand curriculum. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 12, 23–40.CrossRef Turnbull, W. (2002). The place of authenticity in technology in the New Zealand curriculum. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 12, 23–40.CrossRef
go back to reference Wagner, T. (2008). The global achievement gap: why even our best schools don’t teach the new survival skills our children need–-and what we can do about it. New York: Basic Books. Wagner, T. (2008). The global achievement gap: why even our best schools don’t teach the new survival skills our children need–-and what we can do about it. New York: Basic Books.
go back to reference Wertsch, J. (1998). Mind as action: The task of sociocultural analysis. New York: Oxford University Press. Wertsch, J. (1998). Mind as action: The task of sociocultural analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Yliverronen, V. (2018). Preschoolers’ peer collaboration on a designing task. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 23(2), 106–128. Yliverronen, V. (2018). Preschoolers’ peer collaboration on a designing task. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 23(2), 106–128.
go back to reference Zinchenko, V. P. (1985). Vygotsky’s ideas about units for the analysis of mind. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition (pp. 94–118). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Zinchenko, V. P. (1985). Vygotsky’s ideas about units for the analysis of mind. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition (pp. 94–118). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Metadata
Title
Assisting teachers’ understanding of student learning in technology
Author
Wendy Fox-Turnbull
Publication date
30-11-2018
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Journal of Technology and Design Education / Issue 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0957-7572
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1804
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9484-x

Other articles of this Issue 5/2019

International Journal of Technology and Design Education 5/2019 Go to the issue

Premium Partner