Top

14-04-2024 | Original Research

Bacterial cellulose-based scaffold: synthesis and surface modification for sustained rifampicin release for topic skin infections treatment

Authors: Caroline Yamada, Silmara C. Lazarini, Nayara C. do Amaral, Hernane S. Barud, Rafael Mariano-Neto, Adriano Marques Gonçalves, Guedmiller Souza de Oliveira, Bruna Cardinali Lustri, Wilton R. Lustri

Published in: Cellulose

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

The present work aims to produce bacterial cellulose (BC) using Komagataeibacter hansenii, which was isolated after selective conditions in cultivation at 35 C, which were subjected to surface modifications through methanol treatment to produce membranes with different physical characteristics, which allow its use as device for sustained release of the antibacterial drug rifampicin (RIF) with broad spectrum and bactericidal activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative species, being able to penetrate bacterial biofilms, for potential use as a dressing for the prevention or treatment of skin and soft-tissue infection (SSTI). Here, BC produced was treated with methanol (BC-MeOH) to obtain optimized membranes for use as sustained-release devices for the antibacterial RIF. Parameters such as fiber densities, thickness, and entanglement were assessed for BC-MeOH impregnated with RIF in methanolic solution (BC-MeOH-RIF) compared to BC in distilled water impregnated with RIF in an aqueous solution (BC-H₂O-RIF) concerning the capacity for sustained release of RIF. BC-MeOH-RIF and BC-H₂O-RIF were characterized by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FEG-SEM), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The comparison between the sustained release capacity of RIF by BC-RIF-MeOH and BC-RIF-H₂O by applying the disc diffusion and Franz cell kinetics techniques demonstrated the ability of BC-RIF-MeOH to release, in a sustained manner, for 696 h uninterruptedly. Cell viability analysis showed that MeOH treatment did not interfere the development and adhesion of J774 cells, demonstrating the absence of cytotoxicity after heat treatment. Intermolecular interactions between RIF and BC were accounted for in water and methanol solutions using molecular dynamics simulations (MDS). Both FEG-SEM and MDS demonstrated that the interaction energy of the BC-RIF-MeOH set related to the RIF-BC is stronger in methanol solution than in water. These findings demonstrate that BC-RIF-MeOH can contribute to increase the therapeutic arsenal for bacterial infection treatment of SSTIs.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Available only for authorised users

Agrawal S, Ashokraj Y, Bharatam PV et al (2004) Solid-state characterization of rifampicin samples and its biopharmaceutic relevance. Eur J Pharm Sci 22:127–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2004.02.011CrossRefPubMed

Aguilar-Colomer A, Colilla M, Izquierdo-Barba I et al (2021) Impact of the antibiotic-cargo from MSNs on gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial biofilms. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 311:110681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110681CrossRefPubMed

Alifano P, Palumbo C, Pasanisi D, Talà A (2014) Rifampicin-resistance, rpoB polymorphism and RNA polymerase genetic engineering. J Biotechnol 202:60–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.11.024CrossRefPubMed

Alves R, Reis TVDS, Da Silva LCC et al (2010) Thermal behavior and decomposition kinetics of rifampicin polymorphs under isothermal and non-isothermal conditions. Braz J Pharm Sci 46:343–351. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-82502010000200022CrossRef

Anjum S, Arora A, Alam MS, Gupta B (2016) Development of antimicrobial and scar preventive chitosan hydrogel wound dressings. Int J Pharm 508:92–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.05.013CrossRefPubMed

Anjum A, Sim C, Ng S (2017) Hydrogels Containing Antibiofilm and Antimicrobial Agents Beneficial for Biofilm-Associated Wound Infection : Formulation Characterizations and In vitro Study. AAPS PharmSciTech 19:1219–1230. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-017-0937-4CrossRefPubMed

Aquaroni NAS, Nakahata DH, Lazarini SC et al (2020) Antibacterial activities and antiproliferative assays over a tumor cells panel of a silver complex with 4-aminobenzoic acid: Studies in vitro of sustained release using bacterial cellulose membranes as support. J Inorg Biochem 212:111247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2020.111247CrossRefPubMed

Asanarong O, Minh Quan V, Boonrungsiman S, Sukyai P (2021) Bioactive wound dressing using bacterial cellulose loaded with papain composite: Morphology, loading/release and antibacterial properties. Eur Polym J 143:110224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.110224CrossRef

Badshah M, Ullah H, Rahman A et al (2018) Surface modi fi cation and evaluation of bacterial cellulose for drug delivery. Int J Biol Macromol 113:526–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.02.135CrossRefPubMed

Beekmann U, Schmölz L, Lorkowski S et al (2020) Process control and scale-up of modified bacterial cellulose production for tailor-made anti-inflammatory drug delivery systems. Carbohydr Polym 236:116062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116062CrossRefPubMed

Brooks BR, Brooks CL III, Mackerell ADM Jr et al (2012) CHARMM: The Biomolecular Simulation Program. J Comput Chem 32:174–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21287CrossRef

Ciecholewska-Juśko D, Żywicka A, Junka A et al (2021) Superabsorbent crosslinked bacterial cellulose biomaterials for chronic wound dressings. Carbohydr Polym 253:117247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117247CrossRefPubMed

CLSI (2019) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Clin Lab Stand Inst 29:

CLSI (2022) Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 32nd ed.

de Fontes ML, Meneguin AB, Tercjak A et al (2017) Effect of in situ modification of bacterial cellulose with carboxymethylcellulose on its nano/microstructure and methotrexate release properties. Carbohydr Polym 179:126–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.09.061CrossRef

de Oliveira SA, da Silva BC, Riegel-Vidotti IC et al (2017) Production and characterization of bacterial cellulose membranes with hyaluronic acid from chicken comb. Int J Biol Macromol 97:642–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.01.077CrossRefPubMed

de Oliveira Barud HG, da Silva RR, da Silva Barud H et al (2016) A multipurpose natural and renewable polymer in medical applications: Bacterial cellulose. Carbohydr Polym 153:406–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.059CrossRefPubMed

De Salvi DTB, Barud HS, Caiut JMA et al (2012) Self-supported bacterial cellulose/boehmite organic-inorganic hybrid films. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 63:211–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-012-2678-xCrossRef

Demir N, Peker E, Gülşen İ et al (2016) Powder Topical Rifampin for Reducing Infections After Neural Tube Defect Surgery in Infants. World Neurosurg 95:165–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.07.092CrossRefPubMed

Edmiston CE, McBain AJ, Roberts C, Leaper D (2015) Clinical and microbiological aspects of biofilm-associated surgical site infections. Adv Exp Med Biol 830:47–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11038-7_3CrossRefPubMed

Fan W, Zhang Z, Liu Y et al (2021) Shape memory polyacrylamide/gelatin hydrogel with controllable mechanical and drug release properties potential for wound dressing application. Polymer (guildf) 226:123786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2021.123786CrossRef

Frederiksen K, Guy RH, Petersson K (2015) Formulation considerations in the design of topical, polymeric film-forming systems for sustained drug delivery to the skin. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 91:9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.01.002CrossRefPubMed

French AD, Johnson GP, Cramer CJ, Csonka GI (2012) Conformational analysis of cellobiose by electronic structure theories. Carbohydr Res 350:68–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2011.12.023CrossRefPubMed

French AD, Montgomery DW, Prevost NT, Edwards JV, Woods RJ (2021) Comparison of cellooligosaccharide conformations in complexes with proteins with energy maps for cellobiose. Carbohydr Polym 264:118004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118004CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Gupta A, Keddie DJ, Kannappan V et al (2019) Production and characterisation of bacterial cellulose hydrogels loaded with curcumin encapsulated in cyclodextrins as wound dressings. Eur Polym J 118:437–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.06.018CrossRef

Guvench O et al (2008) Additive empirical force field for hexopyranose monosaccharides. J Comput Chem 29:2543–2564. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21004CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Guvench O, Hatcher E, Venable RM, Pastor RW, MacKerell AD Jr (2009) CHARMM Additive All-Atom Force Field for Glycosidic Linkages between Hexopyranoses. J Chem Theory Comput 5:2353–2370. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct900242eCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hamedi H, Moradi S, Hudson SM, Tonelli AE (2018) Chitosan based hydrogels and their applications for drug delivery in wound dressings : A review. Carbohydr Polym 199:445–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.114CrossRefPubMed

Hardie KR, Fenn SJ (2022) JMM profile : rifampicin : a broad- spectrum antibiotic. J Med Microbiol 71(8):001566. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001566CrossRef

Hartinger JM, Lukáč P, Mlček M et al (2020) Rifampin-releasing triple-layer cross-linked fresh water fish collagen sponges as wound dressings. Biomed Res Int 2020:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3841861

Honig S, Seeger P, Rohde H et al (2020) Ef fi cacy of antiseptic impregnation of aortic endografts with rifampicin compared to silver against in vitro contamination with four bacteria that frequently cause vascular graft infections. JVS Vasc Sci 1:181–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvssci.2020.06.003CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hu W, Chen S, Yang J et al (2014) Functionalized bacterial cellulose derivatives and nanocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 101:1043–1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.09.102CrossRefPubMed

Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 14:33–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5

Islam SU, Ul-Islam M, Ahsan H et al (2021) Potential applications of bacterial cellulose and its composites for cancer treatment. Int J Biol Macromol 168:301–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.12.042CrossRefPubMed

Juncu G, Stoica-Guzun A, Stroescu M et al (2016) Drug release kinetics from carboxymethylcellulose-bacterial cellulose composite films. Int J Pharm 510:485–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.11.053CrossRefPubMed

Kahramanca Ş, Kaya O, Azili C et al (2013) Does topical rifampicin reduce the risk of surgical field infection in hernia repair? Turkish J Surg 29:54–58. https://doi.org/10.5152/UCD.2013.35CrossRef

Kalé LV, Bhandarkar M, Brunner R et al (1997) NAMD: A case study in multilingual parallel programming. J Comput Chem 1366:367–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0032705CrossRef

Khanlari B, Elzi L, Estermann L et al (2010) A rifampicin-containing antibiotic treatment improves outcome of staphylococcal deep sternal wound infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 65:1799–1806. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkq182CrossRefPubMed

Kotcharat P, Chuysinuan P, Thanyacharoen T et al (2021) Development of bacterial cellulose and polycaprolactone (PCL) based composite for medical material. Sustain Chem Pharm 20:100404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2021.100404CrossRef

Lazarini SC, de Aquino R, Amaral AC et al (2016) Characterization of bilayer bacterial cellulose membranes with different fiber densities: a promising system for controlled release of the antibiotic ceftriaxone. Cellulose 23:737–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0843-4CrossRef

Lazarini SC, Yamada C, Barud HDS et al (2018) Influence of chemical and physical conditions in selection of Gluconacetobacter hansenii ATCC 23769 strains with high capacity to production bacterial cellulose for application as sustained antimicrobial drug release supports. J Appl Microbiol 33017300:0–1. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13916CrossRef

Leal S, Cristelo C, Silvestre S et al (2020) Hydrophobic modification of bacterial cellulose using oxygen plasma treatment and chemical vapor deposition. Cellulose 27:10733–10746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03005-zCrossRef

Li J, Song T, Xiu H et al (2018) Foam materials with controllable pore structure prepared from nanofibrillated cellulose with addition of alcohols. Ind Crops Prod 125:314–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.09.016CrossRef

Lustri WR, Lazarini SC, Lustri BC, Corbi PP et al (2017) Spectroscopic characterization and biological studies in vitro of a new silver complex with furosemide: Prospective of application as an antimicrobial agent. J Mol Struct 1134:386–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2016.12.056CrossRef

Ma H, Cheng J, Peng L et al (2020) Adjunctive rifampin for the treatment of staphylococcus aureus bacteremia with deep infections: A meta-analysis. PLoS One 15:e0230383. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230383CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Marius R, Holban AM, Mogos GD et al (2016) Bionanocomposites Based on Natural Polymers and Antibiotics for Wound Healing Applications. Molecules 21(6):761CrossRef

Mohd Amin MCI, Ahmad N, Pandey M, Jue Xin C (2014) Stimuli-responsive bacterial cellulose-g-poly(acrylic acid-co-acrylamide) hydrogels for oral controlled release drug delivery. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 40:1340–1349. https://doi.org/10.3109/03639045.2013.819882CrossRefPubMed

Monahan M, Glasbey J, Roberts TE et al (2023) The costs of surgical site infection after abdominal surgery in middle-income countries : Key resource use In Wound Infection ( KIWI ) study. J Hosp Infect 136:38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2023.03.023CrossRefPubMed

Naïm M, Bhat S, Rankin KN et al (2007) Solvated Interaction Energy (SIE) for scoring protein-ligand binding affinities. 1. Exploring the parameter space. J Chem Inf Model 47:122–133. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci600406vCrossRefPubMed

Negut I, Grumezescu V, Grumezescu AM (2018) Treatment strategies for infected wounds. Molecules 23:1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23092392

Nelson CJ (1999) Tcl/Tk Programmer’s Reference. In: AGROECOLOGIA Bases científicas para una agricultura sustentable. McGraw-Hill Professional, p 538

Nomura R, Nakaminami H, Takasao K et al (2020) A class A β-lactamase produced by borderline oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus hydrolyses oxacillin. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 22:244–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2020.03.002CrossRefPubMed

Pang M, Huang Y, Meng F et al (2020) Application of bacterial cellulose in skin and bone tissue engineering. Eur Polym J 122:109365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.109365CrossRef

Pavaloiu RD, Stoica A, Stroescu M, Dobre T (2014) Controlled release of amoxicillin from bacterial cellulose membranes. Cent Eur J Chem 12:962–967. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11532-014-0541-3CrossRef

Picheth GF, Pirich CL, Sierakowski MR et al (2017) Bacterial cellulose in biomedical applications: A review. Int J Biol Macromol 104:97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.171CrossRefPubMed

Politano AD, Campbell KT, Rosenberger LH, Sawyer RG (2013) Use of Silver in the Prevention and Treatment of Infections : Silver Review. Surg Infect 14:8–20. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2011.097CrossRef

Pötzinger Y, Kralisch D, Fischer D (2017) Bacterial nanocellulose: The future of controlled drug delivery? Ther Deliv 8:753–761. https://doi.org/10.4155/tde-2017-0059CrossRefPubMed

Rahman L, Lembang RS, Lallo S et al (2021) Bioadhesive dermal patch as promising approach for improved antibacterial activity of bioactive compound of Zingiber cassumunar Roxb in ex vivo Staphylococcus aureus skin infection model. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 63:102522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2021.102522CrossRef

Ramasubbu DA, Smith V, Hayden F, Cronin P (2017) Systemic antibiotics for treating malignant wounds. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8(8):CD011609. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011609.pub2

Salonen J, Shahbazi M, Ullah H et al (2017) Fabrication, characterization and evaluation of bacterial cellulose-based capsule shells for oral drug2 delivery. Cellulose 24:1445–1454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1202-4CrossRef

Sartelli M, Coccolini F, Kluger Y et al (2022) WSES / GAIS / WSIS / SIS - E / AAST global clinical pathways for patients with skin and soft tissue infections. World J Emerg Surg 17(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-022-00406-2CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Schianti JN, Cerize NNP, de Oliveira AM et al (2013) Rifampicin nanoprecipitation using flow focusing microfluidic device. J NanoMed Nanotechnol 4:2–172. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7439.1000172CrossRef

Shiels SM, Tennent DJ, Wenke JC (2018) Topical rifampin powder for orthopedic trauma part I: Rifampin powder reduces recalcitrant infection in a delayed treatment musculoskeletal trauma model. J Orthop Res 36:3136–3141. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.24055CrossRefPubMed

Silva NHCS, Rodrigues AF, Almeida IF et al (2014) Bacterial cellulose membranes as transdermal delivery systems for diclofenac: In vitro dissolution and permeation studies. Carbohydr Polym 106:264–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.02.014CrossRefPubMed

Simon A, Amaro MI, Healy AM et al (2016) Comparative evaluation of rivastigmine permeation from a transdermal system in the Franz cell using synthetic membranes and pig ear skin with in vivo-in vitro correlation. Int J Pharm 512:234–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.08.052CrossRefPubMed

Stevens DL, Bisno AL, Chambers HF et al (2014) Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Skin and Soft Tissue Infections : 2014 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 59:e10–e52. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciu296CrossRefPubMed

Sutradhar I, Zaman MH (2021) Evaluation of the effect of temperature on the stability and antimicrobial activity of rifampicin quinone. J Pharm Biomed Anal 197:113941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2021.113941CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Torshin IY, Weber IT, Harrison RW (2002) Geometric criteria of hydrogen bonds in proteins and identification of “bifurcated” hydrogen bonds. Protein Eng 15:359–363. https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/15.5.359CrossRefPubMed

Treesuppharat W, Rojanapanthu P, Siangsanoh C et al (2017) Synthesis and characterization of bacterial cellulose and gelatin-based hydrogel composites for drug-delivery systems. Biotechnol Rep 15:84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2017.07.002CrossRef

Trovatti E, Freire CSR, Pinto PC et al (2012) Bacterial cellulose membranes applied in topical and transdermal delivery of lidocaine hydrochloride and ibuprofen: In vitro diffusion studies. Int J Pharm 435:83–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.01.002CrossRefPubMed

Ul-islam M, Khan S, Ullah MW, Park JK (2015) Bacterial cellulose composites : Synthetic strategies and multiple applications in bio-medical and electro-conductive fields. Biotechnol J 10(12):1847–1861. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201500106CrossRefPubMed

Ullah H, Wahid F, Santos HA, Khan T (2016) Advances in biomedical and pharmaceutical applications of functional bacterial cellulose-based nanocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 150:330–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.05.029CrossRefPubMed

Versey Z, da Cruz Nizer WS, Russell E et al (2021) Biofilm-Innate Immune Interface: Contribution to Chronic Wound Formation. Front. Immunol 12:648554CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Watkins RR, David MZ (2021) Approach to the Patient with a Skin and Soft Tissue Infection. Infect Dis Clin North Am 35:1–48CrossRefPubMed

Ye S, Jiang L, Wu J et al (2018) Flexible Amoxicillin Grafted Bacterial Cellulose Sponges for Wound Dressing : in Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation Flexible Amoxicillin Grafted Bacterial Cellulose Sponges for Wound Dressing : in Vitro and in Vivo Evaluation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10(6):5862–5870. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b16680CrossRefPubMed

Zhang K, Li X, Yu C, Wang Y (2020) Promising Therapeutic Strategies Against Microbial Biofilm Challenges. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 10:359CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Zhang L, Yu Y, Zheng S et al (2021) Preparation and properties of conductive bacterial cellulose-based graphene oxide-silver nanoparticles antibacterial dressing. Carbohydr Polym 257:117671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117671CrossRefPubMed

Zheng J, Shang Y, Wu Y et al (2022) Loratadine inhibits Staphylococcus aureus virulence and biofilm formation Loratadine inhibits Staphylococcus aureus virulence and biofilm formation. iScience 2022:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.103731

Title: Bacterial cellulose-based scaffold: synthesis and surface modification for sustained rifampicin release for topic skin infections treatment
Authors: Caroline Yamada
Silmara C. Lazarini
Nayara C. do Amaral
Hernane S. Barud
Rafael Mariano-Neto
Adriano Marques Gonçalves
Guedmiller Souza de Oliveira
Bruna Cardinali Lustri
Wilton R. Lustri
Publication date: 14-04-2024
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: Cellulose
Print ISSN: 0969-0239
Electronic ISSN: 1572-882X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-024-05901-0