Advertisement
Published in:
01-04-2009 | Aufsätze
Balancing Competing Goals
Exploring the political controversy on new hospital payment systems in Germany, the Netherlands and the UK
Published in: Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft | Issue 1/2009
Log inActivate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.
Select sections of text to find matching patents with Artificial Intelligence. powered by
Select sections of text to find additional relevant content using AI-assisted search. powered by
Abstract
The main research question is to what extent political parties present different views on the introduction of New Public Management (NPM) elements in health care reforms, in particular a new hospital payment system, and how this diversity can be explained by national contexts and ideological dividing lines between parties. Our content analysis of election manifestos and parliamentary debates shows that the introduction of NPM is marked by differences between parties, party systems and national contexts, but these differences do not make health care a positional issue ‘pur sang’ for three reasons. First, parties refer not so much to health care goals themselves but to the best ways to achieve them, second the party differences are often moderate (especially between established parties) and third they tend to fade away during the parliamentary debates in which the implementation of new hospital payment systems is discussed.