Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Political Behavior
Published in: Political Behavior 4/2009

01-12-2009 | Original Paper

Beyond Membership: A Sense of Community and Political Behavior

Author: Mary R. Anderson

Published in: Political Behavior | Issue 4/2009

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Why does community matter for political participation? In this paper, I consider how community psychology, particularly “sense of community” can be used to address questions of political behavior. Individuals’ perceptions about their significance in a given community can have meaningful effects on the way in which communities influence politics. Using a unique survey instrument designed to capture individual’s perceptions of community connectedness and political behavior across five contexts (workplace, church, associations, neighborhood, and circle of friends (i.e., an informal network) I analyze data from 822 respondents and examine how sense of community influences two types of political behavior: voting in local elections and political discussion. The empirical analyses presented demonstrate that sense of community contributes to explaining voting and discussion, even after controlling for demographic, personality, and other political factors.
previous article Terrorist Threat, Leadership, and the Vote: Evidence from Three Experiments
next article Dynamic Representation(s): Federal Criminal Justice Policy and an Alternative Dimension of Public Mood

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
The author recognizes that an alternative approach could have employed the use of an instrumental variable, but such a strategy is risky because of the difficulty inherent in devising persuasive instruments.
 
2
The Big Five personality traits are openness to experience, conscientiousness, extroversion, emotional stability, and agreeableness. These are included mainly as control variables to account for personality affects that may be related to various types of political behaviors. It is entirely plausible, even likely that personality plays a large role in many types of political behaviors and attitudes. For a detailed discussion of personality and political behavior see Mondak and Halperin (2008).
 
3
In terms of the area’s demographic characteristics, the survey site has a population of 284,539, 77% reside in urban communities (U.S. Census Bureau 2000). The per capita income is $19,990. Roughly 48% of the population is male and the median age is 30.
 
4
A computer randomly generated 11,000 telephone numbers and interviewers called 8,309 of the numbers. Of those contacted, there were 1398 eligible respondents. A total of 822 interviews were completed for a response rate of 58% (completed interviews/eligible respondents).
 
5
See Table 1 for the sense of community scale. There exist other measures of sense of community in the literature however, the Chavis SCI is the most used and broadly validated measure of SOC (Chipuer and Pretty 1999).
 
6
For a full review of uses of the sense of community index see Chipuer and Pretty (1999).
 
7
The SCI used in this survey was adapted and contains 11 items, correlational tests conducted on a pilot study reveals that the 11 item battery is highly correlated with the 12 item battery at .989. Because I am interested in the overall sense of community score rather than the separate dimensions outlined by Chavis et al. (1986). I believe the adaptation suits the purpose here very well.
 
8
Note that all of the respondents answered the sense of community questions about circle of friends and neighborhood but many opted out of the questions that dealt with associations, church, and work. This was certainly expected to occur. It makes complete sense that most people have friends and live in a neighborhood but they may not work, attend a church, or belong to an association.
 
9
Difference of means tests was conducted for each pair of contexts. The means between all the contexts are statistically significant except in the following instances: church and association; neighborhood and association; and work and association.
 
10
Reliability analyses were conducted on all five subscales, the alpha was .70, suggesting that the individual subscales can be combined reliably to form an additive index. Each subscale also underwent reliability analysis to confirm that the 11 items could be combined to form an individual context scale. The reliability analysis for each subscale is as follows: church context a = .80; neighborhood context a = .82; organization context a = .78; friendship context a = .81; work context a = .84.
 
11
The independent variables used in these analyses are not highly correlated, please refer to the correlation matrix in Table 10, most fall between .02 and .20, and in only 6 cases does it exceed .40 (but fall below .45).
 
12
The personality traits modeled here are included as control variables. Recent research is beginning to pay attention to the effect of personality on political behavior, finding for example, that personality can be linked to all types of political behavior and attitudes including partisanship, ideology, presidential approval, efficacy, trust, and voting to name a few (Mondak and Halperin 2008).
 
13
For a discussion of the utility of the Big Five Model in psychological research studies see Digman 1990, 1996; Goldberg 1990; and John and Srivastava 1999.
 
14
The Big Five model does not claim to capture all dimensions of personality, (that would require an exhaustive list of survey items) rather its proponents argue that it captures the most important differences in personality. Indeed scholars are continuing to research other aspects of personality that The Big Five Model ignores.
 
15
Question wording for this item was follows: “We’d like to know about discussions that you have about local politics. How often do you discuss issues affecting Tallahassee/Leon County with others?”.
 
16
Except that it does not include home ownership or income. Past research in the area of political discussion does not include these types of variables and in keeping with that tradition, they are not included here.
 
Literature
Anderson, M. R. Community psychology, political efficacy, and trust. Political Psychology, (forthcoming).
Catano, V., Pretty, G., Southwell, R., & Cole, G. (1993). Sense of community and union participation. Psychological Reports, 72, 333–334.
Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.
Digman, J. M. (1996). The curious history of the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives. New York: The Guildford Press.
Huckfeldt, R., Johnson, P. E., & Sprague, J. (2004). Political disagreement: The survival of diverse opinions within communication networks. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Huckfeldt, R., Plutzer, E., & Sprague, J. (1993). Alternative contexts of political behavior: Churches, neighborhoods, and individuals. The Journal of Politics, 55, 365–381. doi:10.​2307/​2132270. May.CrossRef
Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1995). Citizens, politics, and social communication: Information and influence in an election campaign. New York: Cambridge University Press.
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
McClurg, S. (2003). The role of social networks in explaining political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 56(4), 449–464.
Mondak, J., & Mutz, D. (2001). Involuntary association: How the workplace contributes to American civic life. Prepared for the 2001 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. Chicago, Illinois.
Mondak, J., & Mutz, D. (2002). Talkin’ at the Texaco: How workplaces help and hinder the flow of political information. Prepared for the 2002 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. Chicago, Illinois.
Mutz, D. (2002). Cross-cutting social networks: Testing democratic theory in practice. The American Political Science Review, 96, 111–126.
Mutz, D. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Perkins, D. D., Florin, P., Rich, R. C., Wandersman, A., & Chavis, D. (1990). Participation and the social and physical environment of resident blocks: Crime and community context. American Journal of Community Psychology, 17, 83–115. doi:10.​1007/​BF00922690.CrossRef
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work. New Jersey: Princeton University.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Sampson, R. (1988). Local friendship ties and community attachment in mass society. A multilevel systemic model. American Sociological Review, 53(5), 766–779. doi:10.​2307/​2095822.CrossRef
Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Burns, N. (2005). Family ties: Understanding the intergenerational transmission of political participation. In A. Zuckerman (Ed.), The social logic of politics: Personal networks as contexts for political behavior (pp. 95–116). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Walsh, K. C. (2004). Talking about politics: Informal groups and social identity in American life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zuckerman, A. S. (2005). The social logic of politics: Personal networks as contexts for political behavior. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Metadata
Title
Beyond Membership: A Sense of Community and Political Behavior
Author
Mary R. Anderson
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Political Behavior / Issue 4/2009
Print ISSN: 0190-9320
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6687
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-009-9089-x

Other articles of this Issue 4/2009

Political Behavior 4/2009 Go to the issue

Original Paper

Inheritance and the Dynamics of Party Identification

Original Paper

Terrorist Threat, Leadership, and the Vote: Evidence from Three Experiments

Original Paper

Get Out on Behalf of Your Group: Electoral Participation of Latinos and Asian Americans

Original Paper

The Unmet Potential of Interdisciplinary Research: Political Psychological Approaches to Voting and Public Opinion

Original Paper

Who Said What? The Effects of Source Cues in Issue Frames

Original Paper

Dynamic Representation(s): Federal Criminal Justice Policy and an Alternative Dimension of Public Mood