Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Hydrogeology Journal 2/2020

14-12-2019 | Report

Challenges and opportunities from a paradigm shift in groundwater governance

Authors: Hugh C. Simpson, Rob C. de Loë

Published in: Hydrogeology Journal | Issue 2/2020

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Historically, groundwater policy development and implementation have been guided almost exclusively by expert science and traditional risk analysis. This approach has worked well for environmental problems that are relatively simple and predictable. Unfortunately, many of the environmental problems that are being faced by decision makers are complex. Complex environmental problems are a particular challenge because they are ‘quasi-scientific’, meaning that more than scientific knowledge needs to be considered during problem-solving processes. Groundwater protection is an important example of a complex environmental problem, and current research indicates that a broader and more inclusive risk analysis approach is needed. A key part of this broader approach is the involvement of members of affected communities in order to combine expert science, local knowledge, beliefs and values during problem-solving processes. This has been a challenge for the expert science community. In the context of groundwater protection, a shift is required to a more open and inclusive process of policy development and implementation. This report explores elements of the paradigm shift that appears to be taking place in the development and implementation of groundwater policy. First, criteria that qualify groundwater policy development as a complex environmental problem are presented. Second, concerns with addressing complex environmental problems using the current water management paradigm are discussed. Third, an alternative to the conventional approach—collaborative environmental problem-solving—is explored. Finally, examples are evaluated using key benchmarks for collaborative approaches that provide insight into the status of a paradigm shift regarding complex environmental problems

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Cortner HJ, Moote MA (1994) Setting the political agenda: paradigmatic shifts in land and water policy. In: Grumbine RE (ed) Environmental policy and biodiversity. Island, Washington, DC, pp 365–377 Cortner HJ, Moote MA (1994) Setting the political agenda: paradigmatic shifts in land and water policy. In: Grumbine RE (ed) Environmental policy and biodiversity. Island, Washington, DC, pp 365–377
go back to reference de Loë RC (2008) Towards a Canadian National Water Strategy. Final report, Prepared for the Canadian Water Resources Association, Rob de Loë Consulting Services, Guelph, ON de Loë RC (2008) Towards a Canadian National Water Strategy. Final report, Prepared for the Canadian Water Resources Association, Rob de Loë Consulting Services, Guelph, ON
go back to reference de Loë R, Kreutzwiser R (2007) Challenging the status quo: the evolution of water governance in Canada. In: Bakker J (ed) Eau Canada. UBC Press, Vancouver, pp 85–103 de Loë R, Kreutzwiser R (2007) Challenging the status quo: the evolution of water governance in Canada. In: Bakker J (ed) Eau Canada. UBC Press, Vancouver, pp 85–103
go back to reference Falkenmark M (2007) Good ecosystem governance: balancing ecosystems and social needs. In: Turton AR, Hattingh HJ, Maree GA, Roux DJ, Claassen M, Strydom WF (eds) Governance as a trialogue: government-society-science in transition. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, pp 60–76 Falkenmark M (2007) Good ecosystem governance: balancing ecosystems and social needs. In: Turton AR, Hattingh HJ, Maree GA, Roux DJ, Claassen M, Strydom WF (eds) Governance as a trialogue: government-society-science in transition. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, pp 60–76
go back to reference Fischer F (2000) Citizens, experts, and the environment: the politics of local knowledge. Duke University Press, Durham, NC Fischer F (2000) Citizens, experts, and the environment: the politics of local knowledge. Duke University Press, Durham, NC
go back to reference Glasbergen P (1998) The Question of Environmental Governance. In: Glasbergen P (ed) Co-operative Environmental Governance: Public-Private Agreements as a Policy Strategy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 1-20CrossRef Glasbergen P (1998) The Question of Environmental Governance. In: Glasbergen P (ed) Co-operative Environmental Governance: Public-Private Agreements as a Policy Strategy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 1-20CrossRef
go back to reference Gunningham N (2005) Reconfiguring Environmental Regulation: The Future Public Policy Agenda. Environmental Law in a Connected World. Madison: Robert M. La Follette School of Public Affairs, University of Wisconsin-Madison. Gunningham N (2005) Reconfiguring Environmental Regulation: The Future Public Policy Agenda. Environmental Law in a Connected World. Madison: Robert M. La Follette School of Public Affairs, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
go back to reference Innes JE, Booher DE (2010) Planning with complexity: an introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. Routledge, Abingdon, UKCrossRef Innes JE, Booher DE (2010) Planning with complexity: an introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. Routledge, Abingdon, UKCrossRef
go back to reference Jordan A, Wurzel RKW, Zito A (2005) The Rise of ‘New’ Policy Instruments in Comparative Perspective: Has Governance Eclipsed Government?. Political Stud 53 (3):477-496CrossRef Jordan A, Wurzel RKW, Zito A (2005) The Rise of ‘New’ Policy Instruments in Comparative Perspective: Has Governance Eclipsed Government?. Political Stud 53 (3):477-496CrossRef
go back to reference Kuhn T (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL Kuhn T (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
go back to reference Lee KN (1993) Compass and gyroscope: integrating science and politics for the environment. Island, Washington, DC Lee KN (1993) Compass and gyroscope: integrating science and politics for the environment. Island, Washington, DC
go back to reference Mitchell SA, Breen CM (2007) The Role of Research in Informing the Governance Process of the use of Ecosystem Resources. Water Pol 9(Suppl. 2):169–189CrossRef Mitchell SA, Breen CM (2007) The Role of Research in Informing the Governance Process of the use of Ecosystem Resources. Water Pol 9(Suppl. 2):169–189CrossRef
go back to reference Orr DW (1991) What is education for? Six myths about the foundations of modern education and six new principles to replace them. Learn Revol 27(Winter):52–57 Orr DW (1991) What is education for? Six myths about the foundations of modern education and six new principles to replace them. Learn Revol 27(Winter):52–57
go back to reference Rees JA (2002) Risk and integrated water management. TECL background paper no. 6, Global water Partnership, Stockholm Rees JA (2002) Risk and integrated water management. TECL background paper no. 6, Global water Partnership, Stockholm
go back to reference Renn O (2007a) Components of the risk governance framework. In: Bouder F, Slavin D, Lofstedt RE (eds) The tolerability of risk: a new framework for risk management. Earthscan, London, pp 7–20 Renn O (2007a) Components of the risk governance framework. In: Bouder F, Slavin D, Lofstedt RE (eds) The tolerability of risk: a new framework for risk management. Earthscan, London, pp 7–20
go back to reference Renn O (2007b) The risk handling chain. In: Bouder F, Slavin D, Lofstedt RE (eds) The tolerability of risk: a new framework for risk management. Earthscan, London, pp 21–74 Renn O (2007b) The risk handling chain. In: Bouder F, Slavin D, Lofstedt RE (eds) The tolerability of risk: a new framework for risk management. Earthscan, London, pp 21–74
go back to reference Renn O (2008) Risk governance: coping with uncertainty in a complex world. Earthscan, LondonCrossRef Renn O (2008) Risk governance: coping with uncertainty in a complex world. Earthscan, LondonCrossRef
go back to reference Rivera A, Crowe A, Kohut A, Rudolph D, Baker C, Pupek D, Shaheen N, Lewis M, Parks K (2003) Canadian framework for collaboration on groundwater. Geological Survey of Canada Contribution Series 2003117. Natural Resources Canada, OttawaCrossRef Rivera A, Crowe A, Kohut A, Rudolph D, Baker C, Pupek D, Shaheen N, Lewis M, Parks K (2003) Canadian framework for collaboration on groundwater. Geological Survey of Canada Contribution Series 2003117. Natural Resources Canada, OttawaCrossRef
go back to reference Simpson H, de Loë R, Andrey J (2015) Vernacular knowledge and water management: towards the integration of expert science and local knowledge in Ontario, Canada. Water Alternat 8(3):352–372 Simpson H, de Loë R, Andrey J (2015) Vernacular knowledge and water management: towards the integration of expert science and local knowledge in Ontario, Canada. Water Alternat 8(3):352–372
go back to reference Simpson H, de Loë R, Rudolph D (2018) Evaluating an agri-environmental network and its role in collaborative problem-solving. In: Swatuk L, Cash C (eds) Water, energy, food and people across the global south. Palgrave MacMillan, London, pp 261–304CrossRef Simpson H, de Loë R, Rudolph D (2018) Evaluating an agri-environmental network and its role in collaborative problem-solving. In: Swatuk L, Cash C (eds) Water, energy, food and people across the global south. Palgrave MacMillan, London, pp 261–304CrossRef
go back to reference Smith K (2004) Environmental threats: assessing risk and reducing disaster, 4th edn. Routledge, London Smith K (2004) Environmental threats: assessing risk and reducing disaster, 4th edn. Routledge, London
go back to reference Taylor B, de Loë RC, Bjornlaud H (2013) Evaluating knowledge production in collaborative water governance. Water Alternat 6(1):42–66 Taylor B, de Loë RC, Bjornlaud H (2013) Evaluating knowledge production in collaborative water governance. Water Alternat 6(1):42–66
go back to reference Turner S (2004) Quasi-science and the state: ‘governing science’ in comparative perspective. In: Stehr N (ed) The governance of knowledge. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ, pp 241–268 Turner S (2004) Quasi-science and the state: ‘governing science’ in comparative perspective. In: Stehr N (ed) The governance of knowledge. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ, pp 241–268
go back to reference Van den Daele W (1994) Traditional knowledge in modern society: the governance of knowledge. In: Stehr N (ed) The governance of knowledge. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ, pp 27–39 Van den Daele W (1994) Traditional knowledge in modern society: the governance of knowledge. In: Stehr N (ed) The governance of knowledge. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ, pp 27–39
go back to reference Van Wyk E, Breen CM, Sherrill T, Magadlela D (2007) Challenges for the relationship between science and society: developing capacity for ecosystem governance in an emerging democracy. Water Policy 9(Suppl 2):177–189 Van Wyk E, Breen CM, Sherrill T, Magadlela D (2007) Challenges for the relationship between science and society: developing capacity for ecosystem governance in an emerging democracy. Water Policy 9(Suppl 2):177–189
go back to reference Varady RG, van Weert F, Megdal SB, Gerlak A, Iskander CA, House-Peters L (2013) Groundwater governance: a global framework for country action. FAO, Rome Varady RG, van Weert F, Megdal SB, Gerlak A, Iskander CA, House-Peters L (2013) Groundwater governance: a global framework for country action. FAO, Rome
go back to reference World Resources Institute (2004) World resources 2002–2004: decisions for the earth: balance, voice, and power. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC World Resources Institute (2004) World resources 2002–2004: decisions for the earth: balance, voice, and power. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC
Metadata
Title
Challenges and opportunities from a paradigm shift in groundwater governance
Authors
Hugh C. Simpson
Rob C. de Loë
Publication date
14-12-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Hydrogeology Journal / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 1431-2174
Electronic ISSN: 1435-0157
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-019-02064-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

Hydrogeology Journal 2/2020 Go to the issue