Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Progress in Additive Manufacturing 3/2018

08-05-2018 | Full Research Article

Characterizing the effects of additive manufacturing process settings on part performance using approximation-assisted multi-objective optimization

Authors: J. M. Hamel, C. Salsbury, A. Bouck

Published in: Progress in Additive Manufacturing | Issue 3/2018

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) systems present tremendous advantages over the traditional manufacturing systems, particularly for realizing complex shapes and producing custom parts. These advantages, and the rapid growth in the availability of AM systems, have led to a widespread increase in the use of AM. Unfortunately, general design for additive manufacturing (DfAM) tools that predict the engineering performance of AM parts are largely unavailable, and this has forced engineers to rely on engineering judgment and/or data from physical experiments. The data sets reported in the literature that quantify the performance of the existing AM systems provide much needed insight, but the data produced by experiments conducted on specific AM systems are necessarily of limited applicability. Given the large number of AM systems currently in use today, a potentially vast amount of data are needed to fully understand them all, and new AM systems and materials are being developed almost daily. To mitigate this need for an ever-increasing amount of data, this paper proposes the use of an approximation-assisted multi-objective optimization technique to quantify the performance of an AM system for specific design application in a targeted fashion. This general approach uses a limited number of physical experiments to answer a specific DfAM question of interest, and the results can then be used to design functional parts without the need for additional data. The implementation of the proposed approach is demonstrated with a material extrusion case study.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Gao W et al (2015) The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering. Comput Aided Des 69:65–89CrossRef Gao W et al (2015) The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering. Comput Aided Des 69:65–89CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Yang S, Zhao Y (2015) Additive manufacturing-enabled design theory and methodology: a critical review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80(1):327–342CrossRef Yang S, Zhao Y (2015) Additive manufacturing-enabled design theory and methodology: a critical review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80(1):327–342CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Rosen DW (2014) Research supporting principles for design for additive manufacturing. Virtual Phys Prototyp 9(4):225–232CrossRef Rosen DW (2014) Research supporting principles for design for additive manufacturing. Virtual Phys Prototyp 9(4):225–232CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kumke M et al (2016) A new methodological framework for design for additive manufacturing. Virtual Phys Prototyp 11(1):3–19CrossRef Kumke M et al (2016) A new methodological framework for design for additive manufacturing. Virtual Phys Prototyp 11(1):3–19CrossRef
5.
6.
go back to reference ISO/ASTM Standard 52900 (2015) Standard terminology for additive manufacturing—general principles—terminology. ASTM international. http://www.astm.org. Accessed 31 Jan 2018 ISO/ASTM Standard 52900 (2015) Standard terminology for additive manufacturing—general principles—terminology. ASTM international. http://​www.​astm.​org. Accessed 31 Jan 2018
7.
go back to reference Yakout M et al (2017) The selection of process parameters in additive manufacturing for aerospace alloys. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92(5):2081–2098CrossRef Yakout M et al (2017) The selection of process parameters in additive manufacturing for aerospace alloys. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92(5):2081–2098CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Geng H et al (2017) Optimization of wire feed for GTAW based additive manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 243:40–47CrossRef Geng H et al (2017) Optimization of wire feed for GTAW based additive manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 243:40–47CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Turner N et al (2014) A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: I. Process design and modeling. Rapid Prototyp J 20(3):192–204CrossRef Turner N et al (2014) A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: I. Process design and modeling. Rapid Prototyp J 20(3):192–204CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Tymrak BM et al (2014) Mechanical properties of components fabricated with open-source 3-D printers under realistic environmental conditions. Mater Des 58:242–246CrossRef Tymrak BM et al (2014) Mechanical properties of components fabricated with open-source 3-D printers under realistic environmental conditions. Mater Des 58:242–246CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Chacon JM et al (2017) Additive manufacturing of PLA structures using fused deposition modelling: effect of process parameters on mechanical properties and their optimal selection. Mater Des 124:143–157CrossRef Chacon JM et al (2017) Additive manufacturing of PLA structures using fused deposition modelling: effect of process parameters on mechanical properties and their optimal selection. Mater Des 124:143–157CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Torres J et al (2015) Mechanical property optimization of FDM PLA in shear with multiple objectives. JOM 67(5):1183–1193CrossRef Torres J et al (2015) Mechanical property optimization of FDM PLA in shear with multiple objectives. JOM 67(5):1183–1193CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lanzotti et al (2015) Understanding process parameter effects of RepRap open-source three-dimensional printers through a design of experiments approach. J Manuf Sci Eng 137(1):011017/1–011017/7CrossRef Lanzotti et al (2015) Understanding process parameter effects of RepRap open-source three-dimensional printers through a design of experiments approach. J Manuf Sci Eng 137(1):011017/1–011017/7CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mohamed OA et al (2015) Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters: a review of current research and future prospects. Adv Manuf 3(1):42–53CrossRef Mohamed OA et al (2015) Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters: a review of current research and future prospects. Adv Manuf 3(1):42–53CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Singh S et al (2017) Optimization of selective laser sintering process parameters to achieve the maximum density and hardness in polyamide parts. Prog Addit Manuf 2(1–2):19–30CrossRef Singh S et al (2017) Optimization of selective laser sintering process parameters to achieve the maximum density and hardness in polyamide parts. Prog Addit Manuf 2(1–2):19–30CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Costa SF et al (2017) Estimation of filament temperature and adhesion development in fused deposition techniques. J Mater Process Technol 245:167–179CrossRef Costa SF et al (2017) Estimation of filament temperature and adhesion development in fused deposition techniques. J Mater Process Technol 245:167–179CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Zhang J et al (2017) Numerical investigation of the influence of process conditions on the temperature variation in fused deposition modeling. Mater Des 130:59–68CrossRef Zhang J et al (2017) Numerical investigation of the influence of process conditions on the temperature variation in fused deposition modeling. Mater Des 130:59–68CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Rao SS (2009) Engineering optimization: theory and practice. Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey Rao SS (2009) Engineering optimization: theory and practice. Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey
24.
go back to reference Deb K (2001) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Wiley, New YorkMATH Deb K (2001) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Wiley, New YorkMATH
25.
go back to reference Jin Y (2011) Surrogate-assisted evolutionary computation: recent advances and future challenges. Swarm Evolut Comput 1(2):61–70CrossRef Jin Y (2011) Surrogate-assisted evolutionary computation: recent advances and future challenges. Swarm Evolut Comput 1(2):61–70CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Forrester AI, Keane AJ (2009) Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization. Prog Aerosp Sci 45(1):50–79CrossRef Forrester AI, Keane AJ (2009) Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization. Prog Aerosp Sci 45(1):50–79CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Wang GG, Shan S (2007) Review of metamodeling techniques in support of engineering design optimization. J Mech Des 129(4):370–380CrossRef Wang GG, Shan S (2007) Review of metamodeling techniques in support of engineering design optimization. J Mech Des 129(4):370–380CrossRef
28.
29.
go back to reference ASTM Standard D790 (2017) Standard test methods for flexural properties of unreinforced and reinforced plastics and electrical insulating materials. ASTM international. http://www.astm.org. Accessed 31 Jan 2018 ASTM Standard D790 (2017) Standard test methods for flexural properties of unreinforced and reinforced plastics and electrical insulating materials. ASTM international. http://​www.​astm.​org. Accessed 31 Jan 2018
30.
go back to reference Garlotta D (2001) A literature review of poly (lactic acid). J Polym Environ 92:63–84CrossRef Garlotta D (2001) A literature review of poly (lactic acid). J Polym Environ 92:63–84CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Characterizing the effects of additive manufacturing process settings on part performance using approximation-assisted multi-objective optimization
Authors
J. M. Hamel
C. Salsbury
A. Bouck
Publication date
08-05-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Progress in Additive Manufacturing / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 2363-9512
Electronic ISSN: 2363-9520
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-018-0043-5

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Progress in Additive Manufacturing 3/2018 Go to the issue

Premium Partners