Top

Journal of Computing in Higher Education

Published in:

01-12-2016

Collaboration, multi-tasking and problem solving performance in shared virtual spaces

Authors: Lin Lin, Leila A. Mills, Dirk Ifenthaler

Published in: Journal of Computing in Higher Education | Issue 3/2016

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Collaborative problem-solving is often not a sequential process; instead, it can involve tasking switching or dual tasking (i.e., multitasking) activities in that the collaborators need to shift their attention between the targeted problems and the conversations they carry on with their collaborators. It is not known to what extent the multitasking activities increase or decrease collaborators’ problem-solving performance. This current paper examined collaborative problem solving in shared virtual spaces. The main question asked was: How do collaboration and performance differ between collaborative problem solvers in multitasking and single-tasking conditions over time? We hypothesized that (1) there is a relationship between multitasking, collaboration, and problem solving performance; and that (2) collaboration is positively related to the overall problem solving performance. A total of 104 university students (63 female and 41 male) participated in this experimental study. Participants were randomly assigned to four different experimental conditions: individual and multi-tasking, collaborative and multi-tasking, individual and single-tasking, and collaborative and single-tasking. Results showed that the participants who collaborated and had multi-tasking activities outperformed the others. Additionally, collaboration helped to improve overall problem solving performance over time. The study offers insights for collaborative learning from both theoretical and methodological perspectives.

previous article How does self-regulated learning relate to active procrastination and other learning behaviors?

next article Comparing learner community behavior in multiple presentations of a Massive Open Online Course

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Alavi, M., & Dufner, D. (2005). Technology-mediated collaborative learning: A research perspective. In S. R. Hiltz & R. Goldman (Eds.), Learning together online: Research on asynchronous learning networks (pp. 191–213). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Amthauer, R., Brocke, B., Liepmann, D., & Beauducel, A. (2001). Intelligenz-Struktur-Test 2000 R (p. 2). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

Andrade, J. (2010). What does doodling do? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 100–106.CrossRef

Barron, B. (2000). Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 403–436.CrossRef

Bernard, H. R., Killworth, P., Kronenfeld, D., & Sailor, L. (1984). The problem of informant accuracy: The validity of retrospective data. Annual Review of Anthropology, 13, 495–517.CrossRef

Bluedorn, A. C., Kalliath, T. J., Strube, M. J., & Martin, G. D. (1999). Polychronicity and the Inventory of Polychronic Values (IPV): The development of an instrument to measure a fundamental dimension of organizational culture. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 14, 205–230.CrossRef

Bruffee, K. A. (1999). Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Burgess, P. W. (2000). Real-world multitasking from a cognitive neuroscience perspective. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 465–472). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Chalifour, C. L., & Powers, D. E. (1989). The relationship of content characteristics of GRE analytical reasoning items to their difficulties and discriminations. Journal of Educational Measurement, 26(2), 120–132.CrossRef

Chickering, A., & Ehrmann, S. C. (1996). Implementing the seven principles: Technology as lever. AAHE Bulletin. 3–6 October. Last retrieved on July 31, 2015 at http://www.tltgroup.org/programs/seven.html.

Collis, B., & Moonen, J. (2001). Flexible learning in a digital world: Experiences and expectations. London, UK: Kogan Page.

Conte, J. M., & Jacobs, R. R. (2003). Validity evidence linking polychronicity and big five personality dimensions to absence, lateness, and supervisory performance ratings. Human Performance, 16(2), 107–129.CrossRef

Cross, R., Rebele, R., & Grant, A. (2016). Collaborative overload. Harvard Business Review. 2016: January-February issue. https://hbr.org/2016/01/collaborative-overload.

Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by “collaborative learning”? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–16). Amsterdam, NL: Pergamon, Elsevier Science.

Foehr, U. G. (2006). Media multitasking among American youth: Prevalence, predictors, and pairings. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.

Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 22–30.CrossRef

Gurvich, I., & Van Mieghem, J. A. (2015). Collaboration and multitasking in networks: Architectures, bottlenecks, and capacity. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 17(1), 16–33. doi:10.1287/msom.2014.0498.CrossRef

Hembrooke, H., & Gay, G. (2003). The Laptop and the lecture: The effects of multitasking in learning environments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15, 46.CrossRef

Ifenthaler, D., Lin, L., Mills, L., Bellin-Mularski, N., & Mah, D. (2016). A longitudinal perspective on multitasking and collaborative problem-solving. Paper accepted to the American Educational Research Association (AERA) conference. Washington, DC.

Ifenthaler, D., Masduki, I., & Seel, N. M. (2011). The mystery of cognitive structure and how we can detect it: tracking the development of cognitive structures over time. Instructional Science, 39(1), 41–61.CrossRef

Ifenthaler, D., & Seel, N. M. (2005). The measurement of change: Learning-dependent progression of mental models. Technology Instruction Cognition and Learning, 2(4), 317.

Ifenthaler, D., & Seel, N. M. (2013). Model-based reasoning. Computers & Education, 64, 131–142. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.014.CrossRef

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2003). Cooperation and the use of technology. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology: A project of the association for educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 785–811). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85.CrossRef

Jonassen, D. H., Davidson, M., Collins, M., Campbell, J., & Hagg, B. B. (1995). Constructivism and computer-mediated communication in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 7–26.CrossRef

Just, M., Carpenter, P., Keller, T., Emery, L., Zajac, H., & Thulborn, K. (2001). Interdependence of nonoverlapping cortical systems in dual cognitive tasks. Neuro Image, 14, 417–426.

Kaufman, S. B. et al. (2001). A cognitive model of analytical reasoning using GRE problems. Last retrieved on July 31, 2015 from http://scottbarrykaufman.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Kaufman-Etal-2001-GRE-Problems.pdf.

Kaye, A. R. (Ed.). (2012). Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden papers (Vol. 90). New York: Springer.

Kolfschoten, G. L., & Brazier, F. M. (2013). Cognitive load in collaboration: Convergence. Group Decision and Negotiation, 22(5), 975–996.CrossRef

Lenhart, A., Ling, R., Campbell, S., & Purcell, K. (2010). Teens and mobile phones. Retrieved from the Pew Internet & American Life Project website: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Teens-and-MobileYoung-Phones.aspx.

Lin, L. (2009). Breadth-biased versus focused cognitive control in media multitasking behaviors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) USA, 106, 15521–15522.CrossRef

Lin, L. (2013). Multiple dimensions of multitasking phenomenon. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 9(1), 37–49.CrossRef

Lin, L., Lee, J., & Robertson, T. (2011). Reading while watching video: The effect of video content on reading comprehension and media multitasking ability. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 45(2), 183–201.CrossRef

Lin, L., Mills, L., & Ifenthaler, D. (2015). Collaborative problem solving in shared space. In Proceedings of IADIS international conference on cognition and exploratory learning in digital age (CELDA) (pp. 233–239).

Lin, L., Robertson, T., & Lee, J. (2009). Reading performances between novices and experts in different media multitasking environments. Computers in the Schools, 26(3), 169–186.CrossRef

Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1 basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 229–233.

Mills, L. A., Knezek, G., & Khaddage, F. (2014). Information seeking, information sharing, and going mobile: Three bridges to informal learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 324–334.CrossRef

Mills, L. A., Knezek, G. A., & Wakefield, J. S. (2013). Understanding information seeking behavior in technology pervasive learning environments of the 21st century. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(4), 200–208.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

National Research Council. (1996). The national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Ophir, E., Nass, C. I., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 106, 15583–15587.CrossRef

Pea, R., Nass, C., Meheula, L., Rance, M., Kumar, A., Bamford, H., et al. (2012). Media use, face-to-face communication, media multitasking, and social well-being among 8- to 12-year-old girls. Developmental Psychology © 2012 American Psychological Association, 48(2), 327–336.

Poldrack, R. A., & Foerde, K. (2007). Category learning and the memory systems debate. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 32, 197–205.CrossRef

Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2007). Technology in support of collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19(1), 65–83.CrossRef

Rideout, V. (2013). Zero to eight: Children’s media use in America 2013. http://www.commonsensemedia.org.

Rideout, V. J. (2015). The common sense census: Media use by tweens and teens. http://www.commonsensemedia.org.

Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8–18 year olds. Retrieved from Kaiser Family Foundation website: http://www.kff.org/entmedia/mh012010pkg.cfm.

Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. E. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–97). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef

Rosen, L. D., et al. (2013). Facebook and texting made me do it: Media-induced task-switching while studying. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 948–958.CrossRef

Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2005). Learning to collaborate: An instructional approach to promoting collaborative problem solving in computer-mediated settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 201–241.CrossRef

Salomon, G. (1993). No distribution without individual’s cognition: A dynamic interactional view. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 111–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Scardamali, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences., 3(3), 265–283.CrossRef

Stone, A. A., Turkkan, J. S., Bachrach, C. A., Jobe, J. B., Kurtsman, H. S., & Cain, V. S. (Eds.). (2000). The science of self-report: Implications for research and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Totten, S. (1991). Cooperative learning: A guide to research. New York: Garland.

Wegerif, R. (2006). Towards a dialogic understanding of the relationship between teaching thinking and CSCL. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(1), 143–157.CrossRef

Title: Collaboration, multi-tasking and problem solving performance in shared virtual spaces
Authors: Lin Lin
Leila A. Mills
Dirk Ifenthaler
Publication date: 01-12-2016
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Computing in Higher Education / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 1042-1726
Electronic ISSN: 1867-1233
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9117-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Comparing learner community behavior in multiple presentations of a Massive Open Online Course

Digital systems supporting cognition and exploratory learning in twenty-first century: guest editorial

A study on the use of a metadata schema for characterizing school education STEM lessons plans by STEM teachers

How does self-regulated learning relate to active procrastination and other learning behaviors?

Postgraduate students’ level of dependence on supervisors in coping with academic matters and using digital tools

Extending the will, skill, tool model of technology integration: adding pedagogy as a new model construct

Premium Partner