Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Computing in Higher Education 3/2016

01-12-2016

Extending the will, skill, tool model of technology integration: adding pedagogy as a new model construct

Authors: Gerald Knezek, Rhonda Christensen

Published in: Journal of Computing in Higher Education | Issue 3/2016

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

An expansion of the Will, Skill, Tool Model of Technology Integration to include teacher’s pedagogical style is proposed by the authors as a means of advancing the predictive power of the model for level of classroom technology integration to beyond 90 %. Suggested advantages to this expansion include more precise identification of areas to be targeted for teacher professional development, and the prospect for aligning teaching-with-technology style with student learning styles, in order to better serve educational system goals such as student engagement, learning and achievement. Initial findings are that pedagogical preference or style regarding old and new technologies accounts for approximately 30 % of level of classroom technology integration. The authors contend this is worthy of retaining as a fundamental model improvement.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Agyei, D. D., & Voogt, J. M. (2011). Exploring the potential of the will, skill, tool model in Ghana: Predicting prospective and practicing teachers’ use of technology. Computer & Education, 56, 91–100.CrossRef Agyei, D. D., & Voogt, J. M. (2011). Exploring the potential of the will, skill, tool model in Ghana: Predicting prospective and practicing teachers’ use of technology. Computer & Education, 56, 91–100.CrossRef
go back to reference Anderson, S. E., & Maninger, R. M. (2007). Preservice teachers’ abilities, beliefs, and intentions regarding technology integration. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 37(2), 151–172.CrossRef Anderson, S. E., & Maninger, R. M. (2007). Preservice teachers’ abilities, beliefs, and intentions regarding technology integration. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 37(2), 151–172.CrossRef
go back to reference Christensen, R. (1997). Effect of technology integration education on the attitudes of teachers and their students. Doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas. Dissertation Abstracts International, 58(11), 4242. UMD # AAT9816134. Christensen, R. (1997). Effect of technology integration education on the attitudes of teachers and their students. Doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas. Dissertation Abstracts International, 58(11), 4242. UMD # AAT9816134.
go back to reference Christensen, R. (2002). Impact of technology integration education on the attitudes of teachers and students. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(4), 411–434.CrossRef Christensen, R. (2002). Impact of technology integration education on the attitudes of teachers and students. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(4), 411–434.CrossRef
go back to reference Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (1999). Stages of Adoption for technology in education. Computers in New Zealand Schools, 11(4), 25–29. Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (1999). Stages of Adoption for technology in education. Computers in New Zealand Schools, 11(4), 25–29.
go back to reference Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2008). Self-report measures and findings for information technology attitudes and competencies. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 349–365). New York: Springer.CrossRef Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2008). Self-report measures and findings for information technology attitudes and competencies. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 349–365). New York: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference Christensen, R. W., & Knezek, G. A. (2009). Construct validity for the teachers’ attitudes toward computers questionnaire. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25(4), 143–155. Christensen, R. W., & Knezek, G. A. (2009). Construct validity for the teachers’ attitudes toward computers questionnaire. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25(4), 143–155.
go back to reference Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2014). The technology proficiency self-assessment (TPSA): Evolution of a self-efficacy measure for technology integration. In Paper presented to IFIP KEYCIT. Germany: Pottsdam. July 2, 2014. Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2014). The technology proficiency self-assessment (TPSA): Evolution of a self-efficacy measure for technology integration. In Paper presented to IFIP KEYCIT. Germany: Pottsdam. July 2, 2014.
go back to reference DeMars, C. (2001). Group differences based on IRT scores: Does the model matter? Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(1), 60–70.CrossRef DeMars, C. (2001). Group differences based on IRT scores: Does the model matter? Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(1), 60–70.CrossRef
go back to reference Hall, G. E., Loucks, S. F., Rutherford, W. L., & Newlove, B. W. (1975). Levels of use of the innovation: A framework for analyzing innovation adoption. In S. F. Loucks, B. W. Newlove, & J. E. Hall (Eds.), Measuring levels of use of the innovation: A manual for trainers, interviewers, and raters. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Developement Laboratory. Hall, G. E., Loucks, S. F., Rutherford, W. L., & Newlove, B. W. (1975). Levels of use of the innovation: A framework for analyzing innovation adoption. In S. F. Loucks, B. W. Newlove, & J. E. Hall (Eds.), Measuring levels of use of the innovation: A manual for trainers, interviewers, and raters. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Developement Laboratory.
go back to reference Hancock, R., Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2007). Cross-validating measures of technology integration: A first step toward examining potential relationships between technology integration and student achievement. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 24(1), 15–21. Hancock, R., Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2007). Cross-validating measures of technology integration: A first step toward examining potential relationships between technology integration and student achievement. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 24(1), 15–21.
go back to reference Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International. Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
go back to reference Klausmeir, H. J., & Goodwin, W. (1975). Learning and human abilities: Educational psychology (4th ed.). New York: Harper & Row Publishers. Klausmeir, H. J., & Goodwin, W. (1975). Learning and human abilities: Educational psychology (4th ed.). New York: Harper & Row Publishers.
go back to reference Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2008). The importance of information technology attitudes and competencies in primary and secondary education. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.). International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary information (pp. 321–331). New York: Springer. Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2008). The importance of information technology attitudes and competencies in primary and secondary education. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.). International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary information (pp. 321–331). New York: Springer.
go back to reference Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2015). The will, skill, tool model of technology integration: Adding pedagogy as a new model construct. In D. G. Sampson, J. M. Spector, D. Ifenthaler, & P. Isaias (Eds.), Proceedings of the cognition and exploratory learning in digital age, 2015 (pp. 84–91). Ireland: Maynooth. Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2015). The will, skill, tool model of technology integration: Adding pedagogy as a new model construct. In D. G. Sampson, J. M. Spector, D. Ifenthaler, & P. Isaias (Eds.), Proceedings of the cognition and exploratory learning in digital age, 2015 (pp. 84–91). Ireland: Maynooth.
go back to reference Knezek, G., Christensen, R., & Fluke, R. (2003). Testing a will, skill, tool model of technology integration. In Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA). Chicago, IL. Knezek, G., Christensen, R., & Fluke, R. (2003). Testing a will, skill, tool model of technology integration. In Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA). Chicago, IL.
go back to reference Knezek, G., Christensen, R., Hancock, R., & Shoho, A. (2000). Toward a structural model of technology integration. In A paper presented to the Hawaii Educational Research Association Annual Conference. Honolulu, HI. Knezek, G., Christensen, R., Hancock, R., & Shoho, A. (2000). Toward a structural model of technology integration. In A paper presented to the Hawaii Educational Research Association Annual Conference. Honolulu, HI.
go back to reference Knezek, G., Christensen, R., Miyashita, K., & Ropp, M. (2000b). Instruments for assessing educator progress toward technology integration. Denton, TX: The Institute for the Integration of Technology into Teaching and Learning. Knezek, G., Christensen, R., Miyashita, K., & Ropp, M. (2000b). Instruments for assessing educator progress toward technology integration. Denton, TX: The Institute for the Integration of Technology into Teaching and Learning.
go back to reference Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In J. A. Colbert, K. E. Boyd, K. A. Clark, S. Guan, J. B. Harris, M. A. Kelly, & A. D. Thompson (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge for educators (pp. 1–29). New York: Routledge. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In J. A. Colbert, K. E. Boyd, K. A. Clark, S. Guan, J. B. Harris, M. A. Kelly, & A. D. Thompson (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge for educators (pp. 1–29). New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.CrossRef Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.CrossRef
go back to reference Morales, C., & Knezek, G. (2007). Testing a predictive model of technology integration in Mexico and the United States. In Paper presented to the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference. Ill: Chicago. Morales, C., & Knezek, G. (2007). Testing a predictive model of technology integration in Mexico and the United States. In Paper presented to the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference. Ill: Chicago.
go back to reference Morales, C., Knezek, G., Christensen, R., & Avila, P. (Eds.) (2005). The will, skill, tool model of technology integration. A conceptual approach to teaching and learning with technology. Mexico City, Mexico: ICLE. Morales, C., Knezek, G., Christensen, R., & Avila, P. (Eds.) (2005). The will, skill, tool model of technology integration. A conceptual approach to teaching and learning with technology. Mexico City, Mexico: ICLE.
go back to reference Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509–523.CrossRef Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509–523.CrossRef
go back to reference Petko, D. (2012). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and their use of digital media in classrooms: Sharpening the focus of the ‘will, skill, tool’ model and integrating teachers’ constructivist orientations. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1351–1359.CrossRef Petko, D. (2012). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and their use of digital media in classrooms: Sharpening the focus of the ‘will, skill, tool’ model and integrating teachers’ constructivist orientations. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1351–1359.CrossRef
go back to reference Rogers, P. L. (1999). Barriers to adopting emerging technologies in education. ERIC Document Reproduction. No. ED429556. Rogers, P. L. (1999). Barriers to adopting emerging technologies in education. ERIC Document Reproduction. No. ED429556.
go back to reference Ropp, M. M. (1999). Exploring individual characteristics associated to learning to use computers in preservice teacher preparation. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(4), 402–424.CrossRef Ropp, M. M. (1999). Exploring individual characteristics associated to learning to use computers in preservice teacher preparation. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(4), 402–424.CrossRef
go back to reference Russell, A. L. (1995). Stages in learning new technology: Naive adult email users. Computers in Education, 25(4), 173–178.CrossRef Russell, A. L. (1995). Stages in learning new technology: Naive adult email users. Computers in Education, 25(4), 173–178.CrossRef
go back to reference Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2015). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York: Routledge. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2015). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.CrossRef Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.CrossRef
go back to reference Slavin, R. E. (2015). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (11th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. Slavin, R. E. (2015). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (11th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
go back to reference Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef
go back to reference Vannatta, R. A., & Fordham, N. (2004). Teacher dispositions as predictors of classroom technology. Journal of Research Technology in Education, 36(3), 253–272.CrossRef Vannatta, R. A., & Fordham, N. (2004). Teacher dispositions as predictors of classroom technology. Journal of Research Technology in Education, 36(3), 253–272.CrossRef
go back to reference Wang, L., Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2004). Increasing preservice teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for technology Integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 231–250.CrossRef Wang, L., Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2004). Increasing preservice teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for technology Integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 231–250.CrossRef
go back to reference Watkins, C., & Mortimore, P. (1999). Pedagogy: What do we know? In P. Mortimore (Ed.), Understanding pedagogy and its impact on learning. London: Paul Chapman Publishing. Watkins, C., & Mortimore, P. (1999). Pedagogy: What do we know? In P. Mortimore (Ed.), Understanding pedagogy and its impact on learning. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
Metadata
Title
Extending the will, skill, tool model of technology integration: adding pedagogy as a new model construct
Authors
Gerald Knezek
Rhonda Christensen
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Computing in Higher Education / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 1042-1726
Electronic ISSN: 1867-1233
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9120-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Journal of Computing in Higher Education 3/2016 Go to the issue

Premium Partner