Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Dimensions Read chapter Read first chapter

2020 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

4. Cornucopia

Author : Michael Roe

Published in: Governance, Policy and Juxtaposition

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Well I would claim that all books have this problem at some stage in that not everything that is important fits neatly into separate chapters each of appropriate length. The result is what we have here—a collection of significant issues in relation to maritime governance, that relate to the previous chapter which concentrated on wicked problems but which to be honest lack some coherence. I could invent some but (1) why; and (2) would that really fool anyone?

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter Wickedness
next chapter Polycentrism
Literature
Abbott, K. W. (2009). Strengthening international regulation through transnational new governance: Overcoming the orchestration deficit. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 42, 501–578.
Adams, J. S. (1976). The structure and dynamics of behavior in organizational boundary roles. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1175–1199). Chicago, IL: Rand-McNally Inc.
Adger, W. (2000). Institutional adaptation to environmental risk under the transition in Vietnam. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90(4), 738–758.CrossRef
Adger, W. (2001). Scales of governance and environmental justice for adaptation and mitigation of climate change. Journal of International Development, 13, 921–931.CrossRef
Adger, W., Brown, K., & Tompkins, E. (2005a). The political economy of cross-scale networks in resource co-management. Ecology and Society, 10(2), 9.CrossRef
Adger, W., Hughes, T., Folke, C., Carpenter, S., & Rockstrom, J. (2005b). Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science, 309, 1036.CrossRef
Adger, W., & Kelly, P. M. (1999). Social vulnerability to climate change and the architecture of entitlements. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 4, 253–266.CrossRef
Adger, W. N., Lorenzoni, I., & O’Brien, K. L. (2009). Adapting to climate change. Thresholds, values, governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Agrawala, S., Broad, K., & Guston, D. H. (2001). Integrating climate forecasts and societal decision-making: Challenges to an emergent boundary organization. Science, Technology and Human Values, 26(4), 454–477.CrossRef
Albrechts, L. (2005). Creativity as a drive for change. Planning Theory, 4(3), 247–269.CrossRef
Aldrich, H. (1979). Organizations and environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Aldrich, H. (1982). The origins and persistence of social networks. In P. V. Marsden & N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis (pp. 281–293). Beverly Hills CA: Sage.
Aldrich, H., & Herker, D. (1977). Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. Academy of Management Review, 2, 217–230.CrossRef
Allison, H. E., & Hobbs, R. J. (2004). Resilience, adaptive capacity and the ‘lock-in trap’ of the Western Australian agricultural region. Ecology and Society, 9(1), 3.CrossRef
Ammons, S. K. (2013). Work-family boundary strategies: Stability and alignment between preferred and enacted boundaries. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 82, 49–58.CrossRef
Andrew, S. A., & Kendra, J. M. (2012). An adaptive governance approach to disaster-related behavioural health services. Disasters, 36(3), 514–532.CrossRef
Archibald, K. A. (1980). The pitfalls of language: Or analysis through the looking-glass. In G. Majone & E. S. Quade (Eds.), Pitfalls of analysis (pp. 179–200). New York: Wiley.
Armitage, D. (2005). Adaptive capacity and community-based natural resource management. Environmental Management, 35(6), 703–715.CrossRef
Armitage, D., Marschke, M., & Plummer, R. (2008). Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning. Global Environmental Change, 18, 86–98.CrossRef
Arnheim, R. (1969). Visual thinking. London: Faber and Faber Limited.
Arthur, M., & Rousseau, D. (1996). The boundaryless career: A new employment principle for a new organizational era. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. (2000). All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 472–491.CrossRef
Ashkenas, R. (1999). Creating the boundaryless organization. Business Horizons, 42(5), 5–10.CrossRef
Ashkenas, R., Ulrich, D., Jick, T., & Kerr, S. (1998). The boundaryless organization: Breaking the chains of organizational structure. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bache, I., & Flinders, M. (2004). Themes and issues in multi-level governance. In I. Bache & M. Flinders (Eds.), Multi-level governance (pp. 1–14). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Backhouse, R. (2002). The Penguin history of economics. London: Penguin Books.
Barber, B. R. (1984). Strong democracy. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Bardach, E. (1996) The eight-step path of policy analysis (A handbook for practice). Berkeley CA: Berkeley Academic Press.
Barnes, B., & Shapin, S. (Eds.). (1979). Natural order. Beverley Hills: Sage.
Barry, A. (1993). The history of measurement and the engineers of space. The British Journal of the History of Science, 26(4), 459–468.CrossRef
Bateson, G. (1958). Naven: a survey of the problems suggested by a composite picture of the culture of a New Guinea Tribe drawn from three points of view (1936). Redwood, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bechky, B. A. (2006). Gaffers, gofers and grips: Role-based coordination in temporary organizations. Organization Science, 17, 3–21.CrossRef
Beck, M. B. (1987). Water quality monitoring: A review of the analysis of uncertainty. Water Resources Research, 23, 1393–1442.CrossRef
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
Berger, P. L., & Kellner, H. (1982). Sociology reinterpreted: An essay on method and vocation. Harmondsworth: Pelican Books.
Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (1998). Linking social and economic systems for resilience and sustainability. In F. Berkes & C. Folke (Eds.), Linking social and ecological systems: Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience (pp. 1–25). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Berkes, F., Folke, C., & Colding, J. (2003). Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Berkhout, F., Leach, M., & Scoones, I. (2003). Shifting perspectives in environmental social science. In F. Berkhout (Ed.), Negotiating environmental change. New Perspectives from Social Science (pp. 1–32). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef
Berlin, I. (1969). Four essays on liberty: Historical inevitability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bernal, J. D. (1971). Science in history (4 Volumes). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Bernstein, R. J. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism: Science, hermeneutics and praxis. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Bettini, Y., Brown, R., & de Haan, F. J. (2013). Water scarcity and institutional change: lessons in adaptive governance from the drought experience of Perth, Western Australia. Water, Science and Technology, 67(10), 2160–2168.CrossRef
Bierman, F. (2007). ‘Earth system governance’ as a crosscutting theme of global change research. Global Environmental Change, 17, 326–337.CrossRef
Birkett, D. (1991). New statesman and society, March 15, 1991 (p. 38).
Birkett, D. (1991). New statesman and society, June 13, 1991 (pp. 41–42).
Blaikie, P., & Brookfield, H. (Eds.). (1987). Land degradation and society. New York: Methuen.
Bohme, G. (1979) Alternatives in science—alternatives to science. In H. Rose (Ed.), Counter-movements in the sciences, sociology of the sciences yearbook (Vol. 3, pp. 105–125), Boston, MA: D. Reidel.
Boss, P. (1977). A clarification of the concept of psychological father presence in families experiencing ambiguity of boundary. Journal of Marriage and Family, 39(1), 141–151.CrossRef
Bourdieu, P. (2002). Cultural power. In L. Spillman (Ed.), Cultural sociology (pp. 69–76). Oxford: Blackwell.
Broad, W., & Wade, N. (1982). Betrayers of the truth. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Brondizio, E., Ostrom, E., & Young, O. (2009). Connectivity and the governance of multilevel socio-ecological systems: the role of social capital. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34, 253–278.CrossRef
Bronen, R., & Chapin, F. S., III. (2013). Adaptive governance and institutional strategies for climate-induced community relocations in Alaska. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(23), 9320–9325.CrossRef
Brooks, H. (1964). The scientific advisor. In R. Gilpin & C. Wright (Eds.), Scientists and national policymaking. New York: Columbia University Press.
Brown, J. P. (1990). No safe place: Toxic waste, leukaemia and community action. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
Brunner, R. D. (1991). The policy movement as a policy problem. Policy Sciences, 24, 65–98.CrossRef
Brunner, R. D. (2010). Adaptive governance as a reform strategy. Policy Sciences, 43, 301–341.CrossRef
Brunner, R. D., Colburn, C. H., Cromley, C. M., Klein, R. A., & Olson, E. A. (2002). Finding common ground: Governance and natural resources in the American West. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Brunner, R., & Steelman, T. (2005). Beyond scientific management. In R. Brunner, T. Steelman, L. Coe-Juell, C. Cromley, C. Edwards, & D. Tucker (Eds.), Adaptive governance: Integrating science policy and decision-making. New York: Columbia University Press.
Brunner, R., Steelman, T., Coe-Juell, L., Cromley, C., Edwards, C., & Tucker, D. (Eds.). (2005). Adaptive governance: Integrating science policy and decision-making. New York: Columbia University Press.
Bruns, B. (2005). Community-based principles for negotiating water rights: some conjectures on assumptions and priorities. International Workshop on African Water Laws: Plural Legislative Frameworks for Rural Water Management in Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa, January 26–28, 2005.
Brunsson, N. (2002). The organization of hypocrisy. London: Wiley.
Bryant, G. A. (1985). Positivism in social theory and research. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRef
Bull, H. (1966). International theory: The case for a classical approach. World Politics, 18(3), 361–377.CrossRef
Bulmer, S. (1998). New institutionalism and the governance of the single European market. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(3), 365–386.CrossRef
Burri, R. V. (2008). Boundary work and symbolic capital in radiology. Social Studies of Science, 38(1), 35–62.CrossRef
Capra, F. (1982). The turning point. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Carr, A., & Wilkinson, R. (2005). Beyond participation: Boundary organizations as a new space for farmers and scientists to interact. Society and Natural Resources, 18, 255–265.CrossRef
Cash, D. (2001). ‘In order to aid in diffusing useful and practical information’: Agricultural extension and boundary organizations. Science, Technology and Human Values, 26(4), 431–453.CrossRef
Cash, D., Adger, W., Berkes, F., Garden, P., Lebel, L., Olsson, P., et al. (2006). Scale and cross-scale dynamics: Governance and information in a multi-level world. Ecology and Society, 11(2), 8.CrossRef
Cash, D., Clark, W. C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N. M., Eckley, N. & Jӓger, J. (2002). Salience, credibility, legitimacy and boundaries linking research, assessment and decision-making. KSG Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP02-046. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
Castoriadis, C. (1973). Reflexions sur le developpement at la rationalitie. In C. Mendes (Ed.), Le Mythe du Developpement (pp. 205–240). Paris: Seul.
Chen, Z., Powell, G. N., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2009). Work-to-family conflict, positive spillover, and boundary management: A person-environment fit approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74, 82–93.CrossRef
Chubin, D. E., & Restivo, S. (1983). The ‘mooting’ of science studies. Research programmes and science policy. In K. D. Knorr-Cetina & M. Mulkay (Eds.), Science observed: Perspectives on the social study of science (pp. 53–83). Beverly Hills CA: Sage.
Clark, S. C. (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53, 747–770.CrossRef
Clark, J. R. A., & Clarke, R. (2011). Local sustainability initiatives in English National Parks: What role for adaptive governance? Land Use Policy, 28, 314–324.CrossRef
Clark, J. R. A., & Semmahasak, C. (2013). Evaluating adaptive governance approaches to sustainable water management in north-west Thailand. Environmental Management, 51, 882–896.CrossRef
Collingridge, D. C., & Reeve, C. R. (1986). Science and policy—Why the marriage is so unhappy. Bulletin of the Science, Technology and Society, 6, 356–372.CrossRef
Collins, H. M. (1974). The TEA set: Tacit knowledge and scientific networks. Science Studies, 4, 165–185.CrossRef
Collins, H. M. (1975). The seven sexes: A study in the sociology of a phenomenon, or the replication of experiments in physics. Sociology, 9(2), 206–224.CrossRef
Collins, H. M. (1981). Son of the seven sexes: The social destruction of a physical phenomenon. Social Studies of Science, 11(1), 33–62.CrossRef
Collins, H. M. (1983). An empirical relativist programme in the sociology of scientific knowledge. In K. D. Knorr-Cetina & M. Mulkay (Eds.), Science observed. Perspectives on the social study of science (pp. 85–114). London: Sage Publications.
Collins, H. M., & Evans, R. (2002). The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science, 32(2), 235–296.CrossRef
Collins, H. M., & Harrison, R. (1975). Building a TEA laser: The caprices of communication. Social Studies of Science, 6, 423–444.CrossRef
Collins, H. M., & Pinch, T. J. (1979). The construction of the paranormal: Nothing unscientific is happening. In R. Wallis (Ed.), On the margins of science: The social construction of rejected knowledge. Sociological Review Monograph No. 27. Newcastle Under Lyme, UK: University of Keele.
Cook, D. C., Liu, S., Murphy, B., & Lonsdale, W. M. (2010). Adaptive approaches to biosecurity governance. Risk Analysis, 30(9), 1303–1314.
Cooper, R. (1990). Organization/disorganization. In J. Hassard & D. Pym (Eds.), The theory and philosophy of organizations. London: Routledge.
Cork, S. (Ed.). (2010). Resilience and transformation: Preparing Australia for uncertain futures. Collingwood, Australia: CSIRO Publishing.
Costanza, R., & Daly, H. (1987). Towards an ecological economics. Ecological Modelling, 38, 1–12.CrossRef
Cowling, E. B. (1992). The performance and legacy of NAPAP. Ecological Applications, 2(2), 111–116.CrossRef
Crabbe, P., & Robin, M. (2006). Institutional adaptation of water resource infrastructure to climate change in eastern Ontario. Climate Change, 78, 103–133.CrossRef
Cross, R. L., Yan, T., & Louis, M. R. (2000). Boundary activities in ‘boundaryless’ organizations: A case study of a transformation to a team-based structure. Human Relations, 53(6), 841–868.CrossRef
Cumming, G. S., Cumming, D. H., & Redman, C. L. (2006). Scale mismatches in social-ecological systems: Causes, consequences and solutions. Ecology and Society, 11, 14–33.CrossRef
Dalkey, N. (1969). An experimental study of group opinion. The Delphi method. Futures, 1(5), 408–426.CrossRef
Davidson-Hunt, L. (2006). Adaptive learning networks: Developing resource management knowledge through social learning forums. Human Ecology, 34, 593–614.CrossRef
De Marchi, B., & Ravetz, J. R. (1999). Risk management and governance: A post-normal science approach. Futures, 31, 743–757.CrossRef
DeLeon, P. (1994). Reinventing the policy sciences: Three steps back to the future. Policy Sciences, 27, 77–95.CrossRef
DeLeon, P. (1998a). Introduction: The evidentiary base for policy analysis: Empiricist versus postpositivist positions. Policy Studies Journal, 26(1), 109–113.CrossRef
DeLeon, P. (1998b). Models of policy discourse: Insights versus prediction. Policy Studies Journal, 26(1), 147–161.CrossRef
Denison, D. R., Hart, S. L., & Kahn, J. (1996). From chimneys to cross-functional teams. Developing and validating a diagnostic model. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1005–1023.
Descartes, R. (1638). Discourse on method, Part 6, Paris.
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302, 1902–1912.CrossRef
Dilthey, W. (1989). Introduction to the human sciences. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
Druskat, V. U., & Wheeler, J. V. (2003). Managing from the boundary: The effective leadership of self-managing work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 46(4), 435–457.
Dryzek, J. S. (1990). Discursive democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Durkheim, E. (1915). Germany above all. Paris: A. Colin.
Durning, D. (1999). The transition from traditional to postpositivist policy analysis: A role for Q-methodology. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 18(3), 389–410.CrossRef
Easton, D. (1969). The new revolution in political science. The American Political Science Review, LXIII(4), 1051–1061.CrossRef
Edelman, M. (1988). Constructing the political spectacle. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Ehrich, K., Williams, C., Scott, R., Sandall, J., & Farsides, B. (2006). Social welfare, genetic welfare? Boundary work in the IVF/PGD clinic. Social Science and Medicine, 63, 1213–1224.CrossRef
Elkana, Y. (1981). A programmatic attempt at an anthropology of knowledge. In E. Mendelsohn & Y. Elkana (Eds.), Sciences and cultures, sociology of the sciences yearbook (Vol. 5, pp. 1–76). Boston, MA: D. Reidel.
Emad, G., & Roth, W.-M. (2009). Policy as boundary object: A new way to look at educational policy design and implementation. Vocations and Learning, 2, 19–35.CrossRef
Engberg, L. A., & Larsen, J. N. (2010). Context-orientated meta-governance in Danish regeneration. Planning Theory and Practice, 4, 549–571.CrossRef
Evans, J. (2012). The genesis theory of consciousness, philosophy for life and other dangerous situations. London: Rider.
Fairbrass, J., & Jordan, A. (2004). Multi-level governance and environmental policy. In I. Bache & M. Flinders (Eds.), Multi-level governance (pp. 147–164). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Faraj, S., & Yan, A. (2009). Boundary work in knowledge teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 604–617.CrossRef
Fay, B. (1975). Social theory and political practice. Boston, MA: George Allen and Unwin.
Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against method: An outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. London: New Left Books.
Fischer, F. (1993). Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise: From theoretical enquiry to practical cases. Policy Sciences, 26, 165–187.CrossRef
Fischer, F. (1995). Evaluating public policy. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
Fischer, F. (1998). Beyond empiricism: Policy inquiry in postpositivist perspective. Policy Studies Journal, 26(1), 129–146.CrossRef
Folke, C. (2003). Freshwater for resilience: A shift in thinking. Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 358, 2027–2036.CrossRef
Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Nordberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of socio-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–473.CrossRef
Folke, C., Pritchard, L., Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Svedin, U. (1998). The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions. In: IHDP Working Paper No. 2. The International Human Dimension Programme on Global Environmental Change, Bonn.
Frame, B., & Brown, J. (2008). Developing post-normal technologies for sustainability. Ecological Economics, 65, 225–241.CrossRef
Franks, J. (2010). Boundary organizations for sustainable land management; the example of Dutch Environmental Co-operatives. Ecological Economics, 70, 283–295.CrossRef
French, R. D. (1984). How Ottawa decides: Planning and industrial policy making 1969–1984. Toronto: James Lorimer.
Fujimura, J. H. (1992). Crafting science: Standardized packages, boundary objects, and ‘translation’. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as culture and practice (pp. 168–211). Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Funtowicz, S. O., O’Connor, M., & Ravetz, J. R. (1997). Emergent complexity and ecological economics. In J. C. J. M. van den Berg & J. van der Straaten (Eds.), Economy and ecosystems in change, analytical and historical approaches (pp. 75–95). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1990). Uncertainty and quality in science for policy. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRef
Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1991). A new scientific methodology for global environmental issues. In R. Costanza (Ed.), Ecological economics (pp. 137–152). New York: The science and management of sustainability, columbia university press.
Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1992). Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science. In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (Eds.), Social theories of risk (pp. 251–274). Praeger: Westport CN.
Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25(7), 739–755.CrossRef
Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1994a). The worth of a songbird: Ecological economics as a post-normal science. Ecological Economics, 10, 197–207.CrossRef
Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1994b). Emergent complex systems. Futures, 26(6), 568–582.CrossRef
Gadamer, H. G. (1977). Philosophical hermeneutics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Galaskiewicz, J. (1982). Networks of control and resource allocation: Corporate contributions to nonprofit organizations. In P.V. Marsden & N. Lin (Ed.), Social structure and network analysis (pp. 235–253). Beverley Hills CA: Sage.
Galaskiewicz, J. (1985). Interorganizational relations. Annual Review of Sociology, 11, 281–304.CrossRef
Galileo, G. (1953) Dialogue on the great world system (1663), G. de Santillana (Ed.). Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Gallopin, G. C., Funtowicz, S., O’Connor, M., & Ravetz, J. (2001). Science for the twenty-first century: From social contract to the scientific core. International Social Science Journal, 168, 219–229.CrossRef
Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case study. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1257–1274.CrossRef
Geels, F. W. (2005). The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: A multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860–1930). Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 17(4), 445–476.CrossRef
Geels, F. W. (2012). A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: Introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 471–482.CrossRef
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Gertler, M. S. (2003). Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being (there). Journal of Economic Geography, 3, 75–99.CrossRef
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 451–495.CrossRef
Giddens, A. (1990). Consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781–795.CrossRef
Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Goodchild, M. F. (2006). Geographic information systems. In S. Aitken & G. Valentine (Eds.), Approaches to human geography (pp. 251–262). Los Angeles CA: Sage.CrossRef
Gottweis, H. (2003) Theoretical strategies of poststructuralist policy analysis: Towards an analytics of government. In M.A. Hajer & H. Wagenaar, (eds) Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society (pp. 247–265). Cambridge. New York: University Press.
Gracia, L., & Oats, L. (2012). Boundary work and tax regulation: A Bourdieusian view. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37, 304–321.CrossRef
Gregory, R., Failing, L., & Higgins, P. (2006). Adaptive management and environmental decision-making: a case study application to water resource planning. Ecological Economics, 58, 434–447.CrossRef
Guetzkow, H. (1966). Relations among organizations. In R. Bowers (Ed.), Studies on behavior in organizations (pp. 13–44). Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
Gunderson, L. (1999). Resilience, flexibility and adaptive management; antidotes for spurious certitude? Conservation Ecology, 3(1), 7.CrossRef
Gunderson, L., & Holling, C. S. (Eds.). (2002). Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Gunderson, L., Holling, C. S., & Light, S. S. (Eds.). (1995). Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. New York: Columbia University Press.
Gunderson, L., & Light, S. S. (2006). Adaptive management and adaptive governance in the Everglades ecosystem. Policy Sciences, 39, 323–334.CrossRef
Gusfield, J. (1981). The culture of public programs. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Guston, D. H. (1999). Stabilizing the boundary between US politics and science: The role of the Office of Technology transfer as a boundary organization. Social Studies of Science, 29, 87–111.CrossRef
Guston, D. H. (2000). Between politics and science: Assuring the integrity and productivity of research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Guston, D. H. (2001). Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: An introduction. Science, Technology and Human Values, 26(4), 399–408.CrossRef
Haag, D., & Kaupenjohann, M. (2001). Parameters, prediction, post-normal science and the precautionary principle—A roadmap for modelling for decision-making. Ecological Modelling, 144(1), 45–60.CrossRef
Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35.CrossRef
Haber, S. (1964). Efficiency and uplift: Scientific management in the progressive era 1890–1920. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Habermas, J. (1970). Toward a rational society: Student protest, science and politics. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1973). Legitimation crisis. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Hahn, T., Olsson, P., Folke, C., & Johansson, K. (2006). Trust building, knowledge generation and organizational innovations; the role of a bridging organization for adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape around Kristiansand, Sweden. Human Ecology, 34, 573–592.CrossRef
Hall, M. C. G. (1985). Estimating the reliability of climate model projections—steps towards a solution. In M. C. MacCraken & F. M. Luther (Eds.), The potential climate effects of increasing carbon dioxide. Washington, DC: DOE/ER-0237, US Department of Energy.
Handmer, J. W., Dovers, S., & Downing, T. E. (1999). Social vulnerability to climate change and variability. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 4, 267–281.CrossRef
Hansclever, A., Mayer, P., & Rittberger, V. (1997). Theories of international regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. London: Routledge.
Hartmann, E. (1991). Boundaries in the mind: A new psychology of personality. New York: Basic Books.
Harvey, D. (1973). Social justice and the city. London: Edward Arnold.
Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hatfield-Dodds, S. (2006). The catchment care principle: A new equity principle for environmental policy with advantages for efficiency and adaptive governance. Ecological Economics, 56, 373–385.CrossRef
Hatfield-Dodds, S., Nelson, R., & Cook, D. (2007). Adaptive governance: An introduction and implications for public policy. In 51st Annual Conference of the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, Queenstown, New Zealand (pp. 1–13), February 13–16, 2007.
Hawkesworth, M. E. (1988). Theoretical issues in policy analysis. Albany, NY: State University of New York State.
Healey, P. (2006) Collaborative planning. Shaping places in fragmented societies. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Healey, P. (2007). Urban complexity and spatial strategies. London: Routledge.
Healy, S. (1999). Extended peer communities and the ascendance of post-normal politics. Futures, 31, 655–669.CrossRef
Heikkila, T. (2010). Fishing for an adaptive governance framework. Public Administration Review, 70(6), 950–952.CrossRef
Hirschhorn, L., & Gilmore, T. (1992). The new boundaries of the ‘boundaryless’ company (pp. 104–115). May-June: Harvard Business Review.
Hisschemöller, M., & Hoppe, R. (1996). Coping with intractable controversies: The case for problem structuring in policy design and analysis. Knowledge and Policy, 8, 40–60.CrossRef
Holling, C. S. (Ed.). (1978). Adaptive environmental assessment and management. New York: Wiley.
Holton, G. (1984, November 2). Do scientists need a philosophy? Times Literary Supplement, 1231–1234.
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unravelling the central state, but how? Types of multilevel governance. The American Political Science Review, 97, 233–243.
Hoole, A., & Berkes, F. (2010). Breaking down fences: Recoupling social-ecological systems for biodiversity conservation in Namibia. Geoforum, 41, 304–317.CrossRef
Hoppe, R., & Peters, A. (1993). Handling frozen fire. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Howard, J. (2010). Managing for justice in community-based water planning: a conceptual framework. Environmental Conservation, 37, 356–363.CrossRef
Howard, G. (2012). Peer review as boundary work. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 43(3), 322–335.CrossRef
Hughes, T. P. (1986). The seamless web: Technology, science etcetera, etcetera. Social Studies of Science, 16(2), 281–292.CrossRef
Huitema, D., & Meijerink, S. (Eds.). (2010). Water policy entrepreneurs: A research companion to water transitions around the world. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Huitema, D., Mostert, E., Egas, W., Moellenkamp, C., Pahl-Wostl, C., & Yalcin, R. (2009). Adaptive water governance: Assessing the institutional prescriptions of adaptive (co-) management from a governance perspective and defining a research agenda. Ecology and Society, 14(1), 26.CrossRef
Humphrey, C., Loft, A., & Woods, M. (2009). The global audit profession and the international financial architecture: Understanding regulatory relationships at a time of financial crisis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(4), 810–825.CrossRef
Hunter, K. G., & Laurie, G. (2009). Involving publics in biobank governance: moving beyond existing approaches. In H. Widdows (Ed.), The governance of genetic information: Who decides? (pp. 151–177). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Hurrell, A. (2007). One world? Many worlds? The place of regions in the study of international society. International Affairs, 83(1), 127–146.CrossRef
Hurrell, A., & Menon, A. (1996). Politics like any other? Comparative politics, international relations and the study of the EU. West European Politics, 19(2), 386–402.CrossRef
Imperial, M. (1999). Institutional analysis and eco-system based management: the institutional analysis and development framework. Environmental Management, 24, 449–465.CrossRef
Innes, J. (1995). Planning theory’s emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14(3), 183–190.CrossRef
Ison, R., Blackmore, C., & Jaquinto, B. L. (2013). Towards systemic and adaptive governance: Exploiting the revealing and concealing aspects of contemporary social-learning metaphors. Ecological Economics, 87, 34–42.CrossRef
Jansson, A. (1991). On the significance of open boundaries for an ecologically sustainable development of human societies. In R. Costanza (Ed.), Ecological economics: The science and management of sustainability (pp. 449–458). New York: Columbia University Press.
Jasanoff, S. (1987). Contested boundaries in policy-relevant science. Social Studies of Science, 17, 195–230.CrossRef
Jasanoff, S. (1990). The fifth branch. Science advisors as policymakers. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Jasanoff, S. (1996). Beyond epistemology: Relativism and engagement in the politics of science. Social Studies of Science, 26, 393–418.CrossRef
Jasanoff, S., & Wynne, B. (1997). Science and decision-making. In S. Rayner & E. Malone (Eds.), Human choice and climate change: An international assessment. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.
Jenkins, W. O. (2006). Collaboration over adaptation: The case for interoperable communications in homeland security. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 319–321.CrossRef
Jessop, B. (2004). Multi-level governance and multi-level metagovernance. In I. Bache & M. Flinders (Eds.), Multi-level governance (pp. 49–75). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Johnson, K. M. (2013). Making families: Organizational boundary work in US egg and sperm donation. Social Science and Medicine, 99, 64–71.CrossRef
Johnston, R. (1976). Contextual knowledge: A model for the overthrow of the internal/external dichotomy in science. Australian and New Zealander Journal of Sociology, 12, 193–203.CrossRef
Jordan, A. (2001). The European Union: An evolving system of multilevel governance… or government? Policy and Politics, 29, 193–208.CrossRef
Jordanova, L. (1991). Sexual visions: Images of gender in science and medicine between the eighteenth and twentieth centuries. Harvester/Wheatsheaf: Hemel Hempstead.
Kaplan, A. (1963). American ethics and public policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kaplan, A. (1964). The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioral science. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Kay, J. J., Regier, H. A., Boyle, M., & Francis, G. (1999). An ecosystem approach for sustainability: Addressing the challenge of complexity. Futures, 31, 721–742.CrossRef
Keeley, J., & Scoones, I. (1999). Understanding environmental policy processes: A review. IDS Working Paper 89. Brighton: IDS.
Keen, M., Brown, V., & Dyball, R. (Eds.). (2005). Social learning in environmental management: Towards a sustainable future. London: Earthscan.
Kerr, A., Cunningham-Burley, S., & Amos, A. (1997). The new genetics: Professionals’ discursive boundaries. The Sociological Review, 45(2), 279–303.CrossRef
Kilpatrick, K., Lavoie-Tremblay, M., Ritchie, J. A., Lamothe, L., & Doran, D. (2011). Boundary work and the introduction of acute care nurse practitioners in healthcare teams. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68(7), 1504–1515.CrossRef
Kirkman, B. L., & Mathieu, J. E. (2005). The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. Journal of Management, 31, 700–718.CrossRef
Knorr, K., Krohn, R., & Whitley, R. (1980). The social process of scientific investigation, sociology of the sciences yearbook (Vol. 4). Boston, MA: D. Reidel.
Knorr-Cetina, K. D. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Knorr-Cetina, K. D., & Mulkay, M. (1983). Introduction: emerging principles in social studies of science. In K. D. Knorr-Cetina & M. Mulkay (Eds.), Science observed: Perspectives on the social study of science (pp. 1–17). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Krasner, S. D. (Ed.). (1983). International regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Kreiner, G. E., Hollensbe, E. C., & Sheep, M. L. (2006). On the edge of identity: Boundary dynamics at the interface of individual and organizational identities. Human Relations, 59(10), 1315–1341.CrossRef
Kreiner, G. E., Hollensbe, E. C., & Sheep, M. L. (2009). Balancing borders and bridges: Negotiating the work-home interface via boundary work tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 704–730.CrossRef
Krohn, R. (1980). Toward the empirical study of scientific practice, introduction. In K. Knorr, R. Krohn, & R. Whitley (Eds.), The social process of scientific investigation: Sociology of the sciences yearbook (Vol. 4). Boston, MA: D. Reidel.
Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Ladson, T. (2009). Adaptive management of environmental flows - 10 years on. In C. Allan & G. Stankey (Eds.), Adaptive environmental management: A practioner’s guide (pp. 261–273). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRef
Lamont, M. (2002). Symbolic boundaries and status. In L. Spillman (Ed.), Cultural sociology (pp. 98–107). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Lamont, M., & Molnár, V. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 167–195.CrossRef
Larsen, K., & Gunnarsson-Ostling, U. (2009). Climate change scenarios and citizen-participation; mitigation and adaption perspectives in constructing sustainable futures. Habitat International, 33, 260–266.CrossRef
Lasswell, H. D., & Kaplan, A. (1950). Power and society. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Latouche, S. (1989). L’occidentalisation du monde. La Decouverte, p. 139.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (1998). From the world of science to the world of research? Science, 280, 208–209.CrossRef
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Laudan, L. (1983). The demise of the demarcation problem. In R. Laudan (Ed.), The demarcation between science and pseudoscience (pp. 7–35). Blacksburg, VA: Center for the Study of Science in Society, Virginia Tech.
Laumann, E. O., Marsden, P. V., & Prensky, D. (1983). The boundary specification problem in network analysis. In R. S. Burt & M. J. Minor (Eds.), Applied network analysis (pp. 18–34). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Lebel, L., Anderies, J., Campbell, B., Folke, C., Hatfield-Dodds, S., & Wilson, J. (2006). Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11, 19.CrossRef
Lee, K. N. (1993). Compass and gyroscope: Integrating science and politics for the environment. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Lin, A. C. (1998). Bridging positivist and interpretivist approaches to qualitative methods. Policy Studies Journal, 26(1), 162–180.CrossRef
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publication.CrossRef
Lister, J., Poulsen, R. T., & Ponte, S. (2015). Orchestrating transnational environmental governance in maritime shipping. Global Environmental Change, 34, 185–195.CrossRef
Llewellyn, S. (1994). Managing the boundary: How accounting is implicated in maintaining the organization. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 7, 4–23.CrossRef
Llewellyn, S. (1998). Boundary work: Costing and caring in the social services. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(1), 23–47.CrossRef
Loorbach, D., & Rotmans, J. (2010). The practice of transition management: examples and lessons from four distinct cases. Futures, 42, 237–246.CrossRef
Lubchenco, J. (1997). Entering the century of the environment: A new social contract for science. Science, 279, 491–497.CrossRef
Luks, F. (1999). Post-normal science and the rhetoric of inquiry: Deconstructing normal science? Futures, 31, 705–719.CrossRef
Lynn, L. E., Jr. (1999). A place at the table: Policy analysis, its critics, and the future of practice. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 18(3), 411–424.CrossRef
Lynn, L. E., Jr. (2001). The making and analysis of public policy: A perspective on the role of social science. In D. L. Featherman & M. A. Vinovskis (Eds.), Social science and policy-making (pp. 187–218). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Maclean, K., Ross, H., Cuthill, M., & Rist, P. (2013). Healthy country, healthy people: An Australian Aboriginal organisation’s adaptive governance to enhance its social-ecological system. Geoforum, 45, 94–105.CrossRef
Majchrzak, A., Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Hollingshead, A. B. (2007). Coordinating expertise among emergent groups responding to disasters. Organization Science, 18, 147–161.CrossRef
Majone, G. (1977). Technology assessment and policy analysis. Policy Sciences, 8, 173–175.CrossRef
Majone, G. (1989). Evidence, argument and persuasion in the policy process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Majone, G., & Quade, E. S. (Eds.). (1980). Pitfalls of analysis. New York: Wiley.
Malcomson, S. L. (1998). The varieties of cosmopolitan experience. In P. Cheah & B. Robbins (Eds.), Cosmopolitics. Thinking and feeling beyond the nation. Cultural Politics (Vol. 14, pp. 233–245). Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Maraldo, J. C. (1989). Zen, language and the other: The philosophy of Ueda Shizuteru (pp. 21–26). Fall/Winter: Kuroda Institute for the Study of Buddhism.
March, J., & Simon, H. (1958). Organization. New York: Wiley.
Marks, G. (1993). Structural policy and multilevel governance in the EC. In A. Cafruny & G. Rosenthal (Eds.), The state of the European Community (pp. 391–411). Boulder CO: Lynne Rienner.
Marks, G., & Hooghe, L. (2004). Contrasting visions of multi-level governance. In I. Bache & M. Flinders (Eds.), Multi-level governance (pp. 15–30). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Marks, G., Hooghe, L., & Blank, K. (1996). European integration from the 1980s: State-centric versus multi-level governance. Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(3), 341–378.CrossRef
Martens, P. (2006). Sustainability: Science or fiction? Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 2(2), 36–41.
Massey, D. (1994). Space, place and gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Matthews, R. A., Barnes-Farrell, J. L., & Bulger, C. A. (2010). Advancing measurement of work and family domain boundary characteristics. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77, 447–460.CrossRef
Mazey, S. (1996). The development of the European idea: From sectoral integration to political union. In J. Richardson (Ed.), European Union power and policy-making. London: Routledge.
McCloskey, D. N. (1987). Response to my critics. Eastern Economic Journal, 13, 308–311.
McDonald, G., Harford, B., Arrivillaga, A., Babcock, E. A., Carcamo, R., Foley, J., et al. (2017). An indicator-based adaptive management framework and its development for data-limited fisheries in Belize. Marine Policy, 76, 28–37.CrossRef
McGinnis, M. (1999). Polycentric governance and development: Readings from the workshop in political theory and policy analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRef
Messer-Davidow, E., Shumway, D. R., & Sylvan, D. J. (1993). Introduction; disciplinary ways of knowing. In E. Messer-Davidow, D. R. Shumway, & D. J. Sylvan (Eds.), Knowledge, historical and critical studies in disciplinarity. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia.
Mikes, A. (2011). From counting risk to making risk count: Boundary-work in risk management. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36, 226–245.CrossRef
Miller, C. (2001). Hybrid management: boundary organizations, science policy and environmental governance in the climate regime, Science. Technology and Human Values, 26, 478–500.CrossRef
Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mitcham, C. (2004). Encyclopedia of science, technology and ethics. New York: Macmillan.
Moen, P., & Chermack, K. (2005). Gender disparities in health. Strategic selection, careers, and cycles of control. The Gerontologist, 60, 99–108.
Molle, F. (2007). Scales and power in river basin management: The Chao Phraya River in Thailand. Geographical Journal, 173, 358–373.CrossRef
Moore, K. (1996). Organizing integrity: American science and the creation of public interest organizations, 1955–1975. American Journal of Sociology, 101(6), 1592–1627.CrossRef
Moore Milroy, B. (1991). Into postmodern weightlessness. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 10(3), 181–187.CrossRef
Morgan, M., Henrion, M., & Small, M. (1990). Uncertainty: A guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Morris, T. (2006). Social work research methods. Four alternative paradigms. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
Mulkay, M. (1979). Science and the sociology of knowledge. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Naess, L. O., Bang, G., Eriksen, S., & Vevatner, J. (2005). Institutional adaptation to climate change: Flood response at the municipal level in Norway. Global Environmental Change, 15, 125–138.CrossRef
Nagel, T. (2005). Induction. In T. Honderich (Ed.), The oxford companion to philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nelson, R., Howden, M., & Stafford Smith, M. (2008). Using adaptive governance to rethink the way science supports Australian drought policy. Environmental Science & Policy, 11, 588–601.CrossRef
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nippert-Eng, C. E. (2002). Boundary work: Sculpting home and work. In L. Spillman (Ed.), Cultural sociology (pp. 79–87). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nowotny, H. (2017). The cunning of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
O’Connor, M. (1999). Dialogue and debate in a post-normal practice of science: A reflexion. Futures, 31, 671–687.CrossRef
O’Doherty, K. C., Burgess, M. M., Edwards, K., Gallagher, R. P., Hawkins, A. K., Kaye, J., et al. (2011). From consent to institutions: Designing adaptive governance. Social Science and Medicine, 73, 367–374.CrossRef
Odum, E. P. (1989). Ecology and our endangered life-support systems. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
Ollier-Malaterre, A., Rothbard, N. P., & Berg, J. M. (2013). When worlds collide in cyberspace: How boundary work in online social networks impacts professional relationships. Academy of Management Review, 38(4), 645–669.CrossRef
Olsson, P., Folke, P., Galaz, V., Hahn, T., & Schultz, L. (2007). Enhancing the fit through adaptive co-management: Creating and maintaining bridging functions for matching scales in the Kristianstads Vattenrike Biosphere Reserve, Sweden. Ecology and Society, 12(1), 28.CrossRef
Olsson, P., Folke, C., & Hahn, T. (2004). Social-ecological transformation for ecosystem management: The development of adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape in Southern Sweden. Ecology and Society, 9(4), 2.CrossRef
Olsson, P., Gunderson, L., Carpenter, S., Ryan, P., Lebel, L., Folke, C., et al. (2006). Shooting the rapids: Navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11, 18.CrossRef
O’Mahoney, S., & Bechky, B. A. (2008). Boundary organizations: Enabling collaboration among unexpected allies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53, 422–459.CrossRef
Orton, J. D., & Weick, K. E. (1990). Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 15, 203–223.CrossRef
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons—The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy and development. World Development, 24, 1073–1084.CrossRef
Ostrom, E. (1999). Coping with the tragedy of the commons. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 493–535.CrossRef
Ostrom, E. (2008). Institutions and the environment. Economic Affairs, 28(3), 24–31.CrossRef
Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C., Norgaard, R. B., & Policansky, D. (1999). Revisiting the commons: Local lessons, global challenges. Science, 284, 278–282.CrossRef
Ostrom, E., Walker, J., & Gardner, R. (1992). Covenants with and without a sword: Self governance is possible. American Political Science Review, 86(2), 404–417.CrossRef
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2006). The importance of social learning in restoring the mutifunctionality of rivers and floodplains. Ecology and Society, 11, 10.CrossRef
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2007). Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change. Water Resource and Global Change, 21, 49–62.
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analyzing adaptive capacity and multi level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19, 354–365.CrossRef
Pahl-Wostl, C., Craps, M., Dewulf, A., Mostert, E., Tabara, D., & Tallieu, T. (2007a). Social learning and water resources management. Ecology and Society, 12, 5.CrossRef
Pahl-Wostl, C., Jeffrey, P., Isendahl, N., & Brugnach, M. (2011). Maturing the new water management paradigm: Progressing from aspiration to practice. Water Resource Management, 25, 837–856.CrossRef
Pahl-Wostl, C., Sendzimir, J., Jeffrey, P., Aerts, J., Berkamp, G., & Cross, K. (2007b). Managing change toward adaptive water management through social learning. Ecology and Society, 12, 30.CrossRef
Palmer, M., Medway, D., & Warnaby, G. (2016). Theorizing temporary spatial clusters and institutional boundary-work in industrial marketing. Industrial Marketing Management, 61, 104–113.CrossRef
Parkins, J. R. (2008). The metagovernance of climate change: Institutional adaptation to the mountain pine beetle epidemic in British Columbia. Journal of Rural and Community Development, 3(2), 7–26.
Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Pennings, J. M. (1981). Strategically independent organizations. In P. Nystrom & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of organizational design (Vol. 1). London: Oxford University Press.
Perutz, M.F. (1989) Is Science Necessary?, E.P. Dutton: New York.
Peterson, J., & Bomberg, E. (1999). Decision-making in the European Union. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRef
Peterson, A. C., Cath, A., Hage, M., Kunseler, E., & van der Sluijs, P. (2011). Post-normal science in practice at the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. Science, Technology and Human Values, 36(3), 362–388.CrossRef
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). External control of organizations. New York: Harper and Row.
Pielke, R. A., Jr., & Betshill, M. M. (1997). Policy for science for policy: ozone depletion and acid rain revisited. Research Policy, 26, 157–168.CrossRef
Pierre, J. (Ed.). (2000). Debating governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. New York: Doubleday.
Popper, K. (1980). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge.
Prigogine, I. (1982). Order out of chaos. In W. J. Mitsch, R. Bosserman, R. K. Ragade, & J. A. Dillon Jr. (Eds.), Energetics and systems. Ann Arbor, MI: Ann Arbor Science Publishers.
Ratner, B. (2000). Watershed governance: Livelihoods and resource competition in the mountains of mainland Southeast Asia. Washington DC: World Resources Institute.
Ravetz, J. R. (1989). Usable knowledge, usable ignorance: incomplete science with policy implications. In J. R. Ravetz (Ed.), The merger of knowledge with power. London: Mansell.
Ravetz, J. R. (1994). Economics as an elite folk science: The suppression of uncertainty. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 17(2), 165–184.CrossRef
Ravetz, J. R. (1997). Science for the age of uncertainty. Public Lecture at Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh PA, 23 Oct 1997.
Ravetz, J. R. (2003). A paradoxical future for safety in the global knowledge economy. Futures, 35, 811–826.CrossRef
Ravetz, J. R. (2004). The post-normal science of precaution. Futures, 36, 347–357.CrossRef
Ravetz, J. R. (2006a). Post-normal science and the complexity of transitions towards sustainability. Ecological Complexity, 3, 275–284.CrossRef
Ravetz, J. R. (2006b). The no-nonsense guide to science. Oxford: New Internationalist.
Ravetz, J. R., & Funtowicz, S. (1999). Post-normal science—An insight now maturing. Futures, 31, 641–646.CrossRef
Reischl, G. (2012). Designing institutions for governing planetary boundaries—Lessons from forest governance. Ecological Economics, 81, 33–40.CrossRef
Restivo, S. (1975). Toward a sociology of objectivity. Sociological Analysis and Theory, 5(2), 155–183.
Restivo, S. (1982). The epistemological relevance of the sociology of science. In D. Campbell & A Rosenberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the conference on epistemologically relevant internalist sociology of science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Restivo, S., & Zenzen, M. (1978). A humanistic perspective on science and society. Humanity and Society, 2(4), 211–236.
Rhodes, C., & Mazey, S. (1995). Introduction: Integration in theoretical perspective. In C. Rhodes & S. Mazey (Eds), The state of the European Union Vol. 3: Building a European Polity? Harlow: Longman.
Richardson, J. (1996). Policy-making in the EU. In J. Richardson (Ed.), European Union: Power and policy-making (pp. 3–30). London: Routledge.
Ricoeur, P. (1976). Interpretation theory: Discourse and the surplus of meaning. Fort Worth TX: Texas Christian University Press.
Rijke, J., Brown, R., Zevenbergen, C., Ashley, R., Farrelly, M., Morison, P., et al. (2012). Fit-for-purpose governance: A framework to make adaptive governance operational. Environmental Science & Policy, 22, 73–84.CrossRef
Rip, A., & Kemp, R. (1998). Technological change. In S. Rayner & E. I. Malone (Eds.), Human choice and climate change (Vol. 2, pp. 327–399). Columbus OH: Battelle Press.
Rist, S., Chidambaranathan, M., Escobar, C., Wiesmann, U., & Zimmermann, A. (2007). Moving from sustainable management to sustainable governance of natural resources: the role of social learning processes in rural India, Bolivia and Mali. Journal of Rural Studies, 23, 23–37.CrossRef
Rivard, J. V., et al. (1984). Identification of severe accident uncertainties, NUREG/CR-3440, SAND 83-1689. Washington DC: USNRC.
Robbins, P. (1998). Authority and environment: Institutional landscapes in Rajasthan, India. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88, 410–435.CrossRef
Roe, M. (2013). Maritime governance and policy-making. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRef
Rogers, E. M. (1962). Communication of innovations. New York: The Free Press.
Romero-Lankao, P., & Gnatz, D. M. (2013). Exploring urban transformations in Latin America. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5, 358–367.CrossRef
Rorty, E. (1982). Consequences of pragmatism. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Rouse, J. (1998). Kuhn and scientific practices. Configurations, 6(1), 33–37.CrossRef
Sandercock, L. (1998). Towards cosmopolis. Planning for Multicultural Cities. Chichester: Wiley.
Sandin, P. (1999). Dimensions of the precautionary principle. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 5(5), 889–907.CrossRef
Scharpf, F. (1997). Games real actors play. Boulder, CO: Actor Centred Institutionalism in Policy Research, Westview Press.
Scholz, J., & Stiftel, B. (Eds.). (2005). Adaptive governance and water conflict: New institutions for collaborative planning. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
Schwanen, T., Banister, D., & Anable, J. (2011). Scientific research about climate change mitigation in transport: A critical review. Transportation Research Part A, 45, 993–1006.
Scott, W. R. (1992). Organizations: Rational, natural and open systems. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Serrao-Neumann, S., Davidson, J. L., Baldwin, C. L., Dedekorkut-Howes, A., Ellison, J. C., Holbrook, N. J., et al. (2016). Marine governance to avoid tipping points: Can we adapt the adaptability envelope? Martine Policy, 65, 56–67.CrossRef
Shackley, S., & Wynne, B. (1996). Representing uncertainty in global climate change science and policy: boundary ordering devices and authority. Science Technology and Human Values, 21(3), 275–302.CrossRef
Shkaruba, A., & Kireyeu, V. (2013). Recognising ecological and institutional landscapes in adaptive governance of natural resources. Forest Policy and Economics, 36, 87–97.CrossRef
Siebenhüner, B. (2004). Social learning and sustainability science: which role can stakeholder participation play? International Journal of Sustainable Development, 7, 146–163.CrossRef
Simon, H. (1957). Administrative behavior. New York: Macmillan.
Skidelsky, R. (2002) John Maynard Keynes, Volume Three: Fighting for Freedom, 1937–46. New York: Viking.
Smith, J., Klein, J., & Huq, S. (2003). Climate change adaptive capacity and development. London: Imperial College Press.CrossRef
Smithson, M. (1989). Ignorance and uncertainty. Emerging paradigms. New York: Springer.CrossRef
Star, L. S., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387–420.CrossRef
Stein, M. B., & Turkewitsch, L. (2016). Multi-level governance and federalism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Stirling, A. (2003). Risk, uncertainty and precaution: some instrumental implications from the social sciences. In F. Berkhout, M. Leach, & I. Scoones (Eds.), Negotiating environmental change (pp. 33–76). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Strindberg, A. (1987). By the open sea. London: Penguin.
Stubbs, P. (2005). Stretching concepts too far? Multi-level governance, policy transfer and the politics of scale in South-East Europe. South East European Politics, VI(2), 66–87.
Sveiby, K. E. (1997). The new organizational wealth: Managing and measuring knowledge-based assets. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.
Tavits, M. (2003). Policy learning and uncertainty: The case of pension reform in Estonia and Latvia. The Policy Studies Journal, 31(4), 643–657.CrossRef
Taylor, C. (1985). Philosophy and the human sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Taylor, J. (1991). Dreams of a common language: Science, gender, culture. New Formations, 13, 103–111.
Termeer, C. J. A. M., Dewulf, A., & Van Lieshout, M. (2010). Disentangling scale approaches in governance research: Comparing monocentric, multilevel and adaptive governance. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 29.CrossRef
Thomas, D. (2008). Where central policies meet local objectives: Exploring sub-basin-level participatory watershed management in Northern Thailand. Chang Mai, Thailand: World Agroforestry Centre.
Thompson, J. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw Hill.
Tognetti, S. S. (1999). Science in a double-bind: Gregory Bateson and the origins of post-normal science. Futures, 31, 689–703.CrossRef
Torgerson, D. (1986). Between knowledge and politics: Three faces of policy analysis. Policy Sciences, 19, 33–59.CrossRef
Toulmin, S. (1990). Cosmopolis: The hidden agenda of modernity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Tribe, L. H. (1972). Policy science: Analysis or ideology? Philosophy & Public Affairs, 2(1), 66–110.
Turnbull, D. (1997). Reframing science and other local knowledge traditions. Futures, 29(6), 551–562.CrossRef
Turner, F. M. (1980). Public science in Britain, 1880–1919. Isis, 71, 589–608.CrossRef
Turner, F. (1997). Foreword. Chaos and social science. In R. A. Eve, S. Horsfall, & M. E. Lee (Eds), Chaos, complexity and sociology (pp. xi–xxvi). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
Turner, S. (2001). What is the problem with experts? Social Studies of Science, 31(1), 123–149.CrossRef
Van der Sluijs, J. P. (2012). Uncertainty and dissent in climate risk assessment; a post-normal assessment. Nature and Culture, 7(2), 174–195.CrossRef
Van Kersbergen, K., & Van Waarden, F. (2004). ‘Governance’ as a bridge between disciplines: cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy. European Journal of Political Research, 43, 143–171.CrossRef
Van Tatenhove, J. (2003). Multi level governance and the ‘institutional void’: The interplay between front stage and backstage politics. ECPR Conference, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
Verbeek, B. (2001). De sturende overheit in het perspectief van internationalisering en Europeanisering. In R. Torenvlied & J. Hakfoort (Eds.), De Staat Buitenspel? Overheidssturing en Nieuwe Instituties. Amsterdam: Boom.
Verweij, M., Douglas, M., Ellis, R., Engel, C., Hendriks, F., Lohmann, S., et al. (2006a). The case for clumsiness. In M. Verweij & M. Thompson (Eds.), Clumsy solutions for a complex world. Governance, politics and plural perceptions (pp. 1–30). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Verweij, M., Thompson, M., & Engel, C. (2006b). Clumsy conclusions: How to do policy and research in a complex world. In M. Verweij & M. Thompson (Eds.), Clumsy solutions for a complex world. Governance, politics and plural perceptions (pp. 241–249). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Von Krogh, G., Ichijo, K., & Nonaka, I. (2000). Enabling knowledge creation: How to unlock the mystery of tacit knowledge and release the power of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Voydanoff, P. (1998). Close relationships, family and the life course. Contemporary Sociology, 27(2), 153–154.CrossRef
Waldo, D. (1948). The administrative state: A study of the political theory of american public administration. New York: The Ronald Press.
Walker, B., Barrett, S., Polasky, S., Galaz, V., Folke, C., Engström, G., et al. (2009). Looming global-scale failures and missing institutions. Science, 325, 1345–1346.CrossRef
Walker, B., & Salt, D. (2006). Resilience thinking: Sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Washington DC: Island Press.
Wallace, H., & Wallace, W. (Eds.). (1996). Policy-making in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Walters, C. (1986). Adaptive management of renewable resources. New York: MacMillan.
Walters, C. J. (1997). Challenges in adaptive management of riparian and coastal ecosystems. Conservation Ecology, 1(2), 1.CrossRef
Walther, H. (1994). Okonomische Doktrinen als Werkzeug politischer-Legitiation. Das Biespiel Monetarismus. In K. Eicker-Wolf, R. Kapernick, T. Niechoj, S. Reiner, & J. Weiss (Eds.), Wirtschaftspolitik im theoretischen Vakuum (pp. 73–96). Marburg: Metropolis.
Weber, M. (1949). The methodology of the social sciences. New York: Free Press.
Weber, E., & Khademian, A. (2008). Wicked problems: Knowledge challenges and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review, 68, 334–369.CrossRef
Weick, K. E. (1969). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Adison-Wesley.
Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1–19.CrossRef
Weimer, D. L. (1998). Policy analysis and evidence: A craft perspective. Policy Studies Journal, 26(1), 114–128.CrossRef
Weinberg, A. M. (1972). Science and trans-science. Minerva, 2, 208–222.
Weinberg, A. M. (1985). Science and its limits; the regulator’s dilemma. Issues in Science and Technology, II, 1, 59–72.
Westley, F. (1995). Governing design; the management of social systems and ecosystems management. In L. Gunderson & C. Holling (Eds.), Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. New York: Columbia University Press.
Wexler, M. N. (2009) Exploring the moral dimension of wicked problems. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 29(9/10), 531–542.CrossRef
White, L. D. (1926). Introduction to the study of public administration. New York: Macmillan.
Whitley, R. D. (1977). The sociology of scientific work and the history of scientific developments. In S. S. Blume (Ed.), Perspectives in the sociology of science (pp. 21–50). Chichester: Wiley.
Wong, C. (2003). Indicators at the crossroads. Ideas, methods and applications. Town Planning Review, 74(3), 253–278.CrossRef
Woolgar, S. (1993). Science: The very idea. London: Routledge.
Wynne, B. (1993). Uncertainty and environmental learning: Reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. In T. Jackson (Ed.), Clean production strategies: Developing preventive environmental management in the industrial economy. London: Lewis.
Wynne, B. (1994). Scientific knowledge and the global environment. In M. Redclift & T. Benton (Eds.), Social theory and the global environment (pp. 169–189). London: Routledge.
Yan, A., & Louis, M. R. (1999). The migration of organizational functions to the work unit level: Buffering, spanning and bringing up boundaries. Human Relations, 52(1), 25–47.
Yanow, D. (2003). Accessing local knowledge: Policy analysis and communities of meaning. In M. A. Hajer & H. Wagenaar (Eds.), Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society (pp. 228–246). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Young, O. (2002). The institutional dimensions of environmental change: Fit, interplay and scale. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRef
Young, O. (2006). Vertical interplay among scale-dependent environmental and resource regimes. Ecology and Society, 11, 1.
Young, K. R., & Lipton, J. K. (2006). Adaptive governance and climate change in the tropical highlands of Western South America. Climate Change, 78, 63–102.CrossRef
Zerubawel, E. (2002). The fine line: Making distinctions in everyday life. In L. Spillman (Ed.), Cultural sociology (pp. 223–232). Malden MA: Blackwell.
Metadata
Title
Cornucopia
Author
Michael Roe
Copyright Year
2020
Book
Governance, Policy and Juxtaposition

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31847-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-31848-2

Copyright Year: 2020

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31848-2_4