Top

Progress in Additive Manufacturing

Published in:

21-04-2022 | Review Article

Corrosion of nickel-based alloys fabricated through additive manufacturing: a review

Authors: Siddhi Mehta, Swarn Jha, Hong Liang

Published in: Progress in Additive Manufacturing | Issue 6/2022

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Traditionally manufactured nickel-based alloys (NiBA) are widely used for their high oxidation and corrosion resistance at extreme temperatures. Recently, additive manufacturing (AM) is being rapidly used to manufacture NiBA due to the ease of obtaining complex forms, low cost, and less waste generation. However, AM route makes NiBA vulnerable to corrosion and eventual failure. Yet, there is a lack of understanding of the effects of AM route on localized corrosion resistance in NiBA. This manuscript reviews the effects of various AM process parameters on the localized corrosion resistance of NiBA. Based on the data gathering and analysis, manufacturing steps for NiBA can be optimized for corrosion resistance. This review helps the community to understand the current and future needs in research and development in additive manufacturing of alloys.

previous article Capability to detect and localize typical defects of laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) process: an experimental investigation with different non-destructive techniques

next article Global local modeling of melt pool dynamics and bead formation in laser bed powder fusion additive manufacturing using a multi-physics thermo-fluid simulation

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Graybill B et al (2018) Additive Manufacturing of Nickel-Based Superalloys. In: ASME 2018 13th International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference. https://doi.org/10.1115/msec2018-6666

Jha S et al (2020) Influence of morphology on electrochemical and capacity performance of open-porous structured electrodes. J Appl Electrochem 50(2):231–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-019-01378-zCrossRef

Chen YRA, Jha S, Parkinson DY, Zhang B, Elwany A, Liang H (2021) Tomography of 3D-Printed Lattice Structured Aluminum-Silicon Alloy and Its Deformation. 3D Print Add Manuf. 8(1):42–50. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2019.0200

Kulkarni AJAAP (2018) Additive Manufacturing of Nickel Based Superalloy. arXiv:1805.11664

Ibrahim H et al (2018) In Vitro Corrosion Assessment of Additively Manufactured Porous NiTi Structures for Bone Fixation Applications. 8(3): 164. https://doi.org/10.3390/met8030164

Tan HW, Tran T, Chua CK (2016) A review of printed passive electronic components through fully additive manufacturing methods. Virt Phys Prototyp 11(4):271–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2016.1217586CrossRef

Jha S et al (2021) Additively manufactured electrodes for supercapacitors: a review. Appl Mater Today, 101220.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2021.101220

(2021) Tomography of 3D-printed lattice structured aluminum-silicon alloy and its deformation. 3D Print Addit Manuf 8(1):42–50.https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2019.0200

Guessasma S et al (2015) Challenges of additive manufacturing technologies from an optimisation perspective. Int J Simul Multisci Des Optim 6:A9CrossRef

10.

Francois MM et al (2017) Modeling of additive manufacturing processes for metals: challenges and opportunities. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 21(4):198–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cossms.2016.12.001CrossRef

11.

Pereira T, Kennedy JV, Potgieter J (2019) A comparison of traditional manufacturing vs additive manufacturing, the best method for the job. Procedia Manuf. 30:11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.003CrossRef

12.

Gutowski T et al (2017) Note on the rate and energy efficiency limits for additive manufacturing. J Ind Ecol 21(S1):69–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12664CrossRef

13.

Huang SH et al (2013) Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: a literature review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67(5):1191–1203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4558-5CrossRef

14.

Gorsse S et al (2017) Additive manufacturing of metals: a brief review of the characteristic microstructures and properties of steels, Ti-6Al-4V and high-entropy alloys. Sci Technol Adv Mater 18(1):584–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/14686996.2017.1361305CrossRef

15.

Peters KR, Whittle DP, Stringer J (1976) Oxidation and hot corrosion of nickel-based alloys containing molybdenum. Corr Sci 16(11):791–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-938X(76)90010-XCrossRef

16.

Hemmersmeier U, Feller-Kniepmeier M (1998) Element distribution in the macro-and microstructure of nickel base superalloy CMSX-4. Mater Sci Eng A 248(1–2):87–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(98)00516-4CrossRef

17.

Jha S et al (2020) Bimetallic tungstate nanoparticle-decorated-lignin electrodes for flexible supercapacitors. Mater Adv 1(6):2124–2135. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0MA00494DCrossRef

18.

Jha S et al (2020) NiWO4 nanoparticle decorated lignin as electrodes for asymmetric flexible supercapacitors. J Mater Chem C 8(10):3418–3430. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TC05811GCrossRef

19.

Hosseini E, Popovich V (2019) A review of mechanical properties of additively manufactured Inconel 718. Addit Manuf 30:100877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.100877CrossRef

20.

Komarasamy M et al (2019) Microstructure, fatigue, and impact toughness properties of additively manufactured nickel alloy 718. Addit Manuf 28:661–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.06.009CrossRef

21.

Juillet C et al (2018) Characterization and oxidation resistance of additive manufactured and forged IN718 Ni-based superalloys. Corros Sci 142:266–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2018.07.032CrossRef

22.

Doi M, Miyazaki T, Wakatsuki T (1984) The effect of elastic interaction energy on the morphology of γ′precipitates in nickel-based alloys. Mater Sci Eng 67(2):247–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5416(84)90056-9CrossRef

23.

Tang S et al (2016) Coarsening behavior of gamma prime precipitates in a nickel based single crystal superalloy. J Mater Sci Technol 32(2):172–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2015.10.005CrossRef

24.

Li C et al (2018) Residual stress in metal additive manufacturing. Procedia Cirp 71:348–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.05.039CrossRef

25.

Wylie CM et al (2007) Corrosion of nickel-based dental casting alloys. Dental Mater 23(6):714–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.011CrossRef

26.

Renderos M et al (2017) Microstructure characterization of recycled IN718 powder and resulting laser clad material. Mater Charact 134:103–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2017.09.029CrossRef

27.

Wanderka N, Glatzel U (1995) Chemical composition measurements of a nickel-base superalloy by atom probe field ion microscopy. Mater Sci Eng A 203(1–2):69–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-5093(95)09825-9CrossRef

28.

Tiley J et al (2009) Coarsening kinetics of γ′ precipitates in the commercial nickel base Superalloy René 88 DT. Acta Mater 57(8):2538–2549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.02.010CrossRef

29.

Arısoy YM et al (2017) Influence of scan strategy and process parameters on microstructure and its optimization in additively manufactured nickel alloy 625 via laser powder bed fusion. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90(5):1393–1417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9429-zCrossRef

30.

Beese AM et al (2018) Absence of dynamic strain aging in an additively manufactured nickel-base superalloy. Nat Commun 9(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04473-5MathSciNetCrossRef

31.

Dehghanghadikolaei A et al (2019) Improving corrosion resistance of additively manufactured nickel–titanium biomedical devices by micro-arc oxidation process. J Mater Sci 54(9):7333–7355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03375-1CrossRef

32.

Douglass D, Thomas G, Roser W (1964) Ordering, stacking faults and stress corrosion cracking in austenitic alloys. Corrosion 20(1):15t–28t. https://doi.org/10.5006/0010-9312-20.1.15tCrossRef

33.

Lou X, Andresen PL, Rebak RB (2018) Oxide inclusions in laser additive manufactured stainless steel and their effects on impact toughness and stress corrosion cracking behavior. J Nucl Mater 499:182–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.11.036CrossRef

34.

Ma D et al (2017) Crystallographic texture in an additively manufactured nickel-base superalloy. Mater Sci Eng A 684:47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.12.028CrossRef

35.

Rebak R (2011) Stress corrosion cracking (SCC) of nickel-based alloys. Stress corrosion cracking. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 273–306CrossRef

36.

Was G et al (2007) Corrosion and stress corrosion cracking in supercritical water. J Nuclear Mater 371(1–3):176–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.05.017CrossRef

37.

Xu J et al (2020) On the strengthening and embrittlement mechanisms of an additively manufactured Nickel-base superalloy. Materialia 10:100657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2020.100657CrossRef

38.

Zuback J, DebRoy T (2018) The hardness of additively manufactured alloys. Materials 11(11):2070. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11112070CrossRef

39.

Zuback J et al (2019) Impact of chemical composition on precipitate morphology in an additively manufactured nickel base superalloy. J Alloy Compd 798:446–457CrossRef

40.

Vayre B, Vignat F, Villeneuve F (2012) Designing for additive manufacturing. Procedia CIrP 3:632–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2012.07.108CrossRef

41.

Gao W et al (2015) The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering. Comput-Aided Des 69:65–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2015.04.001CrossRef

42.

Wong KV, Hernandez A (2012) A review of additive manufacturing. Int Scholarly Res Not. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/208760CrossRef

43.

Gibson I et al (2014) Additive manufacturing technologies, vol 17. Springer, New York

44.

Gebhardt A (2011) Understanding additive manufacturing

45.

Frazier WE (2014) Metal additive manufacturing: a review. J Mater Eng Perform 23(6):1917–1928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-014-0958-zCrossRef

46.

Herzog D et al (2016) Additive manufacturing of metals. Acta Mater 117:371–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.019CrossRef

47.

Murr LE et al (2012) Fabrication of metal and alloy components by additive manufacturing: examples of 3D Materials Science 1:42–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2238-7854(12)70009-1

48.

Seow CE et al (2020) Effect of crack-like defects on the fracture behaviour of Wire+ Arc Additively Manufactured nickel-base Alloy 718. Addit Manuf 36:101578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101578CrossRef

49.

Vanmeensel K et al (2018) Additively manufactured metals for medical applications. Additive manufacturing. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 261–309CrossRef

50.

Dhinakaran V et al (2020) Wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) process of nickel based superalloys—a review. Mater Today Proc 21:920–925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.08.159CrossRef

51.

Sander G et al (2018) Corrosion of additively manufactured alloys: a review. Corrosion 74(12):1318–1350. https://doi.org/10.5006/2926CrossRef

52.

Sidambe AT (2014) Biocompatibility of advanced manufactured titanium implants—A review. Materials 7(12):8168–8188. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma7128168CrossRef

53.

Spears TG, Gold SA (2016) In-process sensing in selective laser melting (SLM) additive manufacturing. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 5(1):16–40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40192-016-0045-4CrossRef

54.

Loh L-E et al (2015) Numerical investigation and an effective modelling on the Selective Laser Melting (SLM) process with aluminium alloy 6061. Int J Heat Mass Transf 80:288–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.09.014CrossRef

55.

Parthasarathy J et al (2010) Mechanical evaluation of porous titanium (Ti6Al4V) structures with electron beam melting (EBM). J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 3(3):249–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2009.10.006CrossRef

56.

Safdar A et al (2012) Effect of process parameters settings and thickness on surface roughness of EBM produced Ti-6Al-4V. Rapid Prototyp J. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552541211250391CrossRef

57.

Li X et al (2009) Fabrication and characterization of porous Ti6Al4V parts for biomedical applications using electron beam melting process. Mater Lett 63(3–4):403–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2008.10.065CrossRef

58.

Dass A, Moridi A (2019) State of the art in directed energy deposition: from additive manufacturing to materials design. Coatings 9(7):418. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings9070418CrossRef

59.

Schneider-Maunoury C et al (2017) Functionally graded Ti6Al4V-Mo alloy manufactured with DED-CLAD® process. Addit Manuf 17:55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.07.008CrossRef

60.

Shim D-S et al (2016) Effect of layer thickness setting on deposition characteristics in direct energy deposition (DED) process. Opt Laser Technol 86:69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2016.07.001CrossRef

61.

Bandyopadhyay A, Heer B (2018) Additive manufacturing of multi-material structures. Mater Sci Eng R Rep 129:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2018.04.001CrossRef

62.

Lu X et al (2017) Open-source wire and arc additive manufacturing system: formability, microstructures, and mechanical properties. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93(5):2145–2154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0636-zCrossRef

63.

Milewski JO (2017) Additive manufacturing of metals. Appl Mech Mater 2017

64.

Najmon JC, Raeisi S, Tovar A (2019) Review of additive manufacturing technologies and applications in the aerospace industry. Addit Manuf Aerosp Ind. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814062-8.00002-9CrossRef

65.

Knezović N, Topić A (2018) Wire and Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM)—a new advance in manufacturing. In: International Conference “New Technologies, Development and Applications”. Springer, New York

66.

Dinovitzer M et al (2019) Effect of wire and arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) process parameters on bead geometry and microstructure. Addit Manuf 26:138–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.12.013CrossRef

67.

Rodrigues TA et al (2019) Current status and perspectives on wire and arc additive manufacturing (WAAM). Materials 12(7):1121. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12071121CrossRef

68.

Horgar A et al (2018) Additive manufacturing using WAAM with AA5183 wire. J Mater Process Technol 259:68–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.04.014CrossRef

69.

Yap CY et al (2015) Review of selective laser melting: materials and applications. Appl Phys Rev 2(4):041101. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4935926CrossRef

70.

Nguejio J et al (2019) Comparison of microstructure features and mechanical properties for additive manufactured and wrought nickel alloys 625. Mater Sci Eng A 764:138214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.138214CrossRef

71.

Zhang F et al (2018) Effect of heat treatment on the microstructural evolution of a nickel-based superalloy additive-manufactured by laser powder bed fusion. Acta Mater 152:200–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2018.03.017CrossRef

72.

Ges A, Fornaro O, Palacio H (2007) Coarsening behaviour of a Ni-base superalloy under different heat treatment conditions. Mater Sci Eng A 458(1–2):96–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.12.107CrossRef

73.

Shen C et al (2018) The influence of post-production heat treatment on the multi-directional properties of nickel-aluminum bronze alloy fabricated using wire-arc additive manufacturing process. Addit Manuf 23:411–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.08.008CrossRef

74.

Detor A, Schuh C (2007) Microstructural evolution during the heat treatment of nanocrystalline alloys. J Mater Res 22(11):3233–3248. https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.2007.0403CrossRef

75.

Schneider J, Lund B, Fullen M (2018) Effect of heat treatment variations on the mechanical properties of Inconel 718 selective laser melted specimens. Addit Manuf 21:248–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.03.005CrossRef

76.

Osoba L et al (2019) Corrosion evaluation of superalloys Haynes 282 and Inconel 718 in Hydrochloric acid 804:376–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.06.196

77.

Jha S et al (2019) Design and synthesis of a high performance coating. In: ASME 2019 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition. https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2019-10433

78.

Forsyth DS (2011) Non-destructive testing for corrosion. Corrosion Fatigue and Environmentally Assisted Cracking in Aging Military Vehicles (RTO-AG-AVT-140)

79.

Guo P et al (2018) Electrochemical behavior of Inconel 718 fabricated by laser solid forming on different sections. Corros Sci 132:79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2017.12.021CrossRef

80.

Fontana MG (2005) Corrosion engineering. Tata McGraw-Hill Education

81.

Isaacs HS (2002) Aspects of Corrosion from the ECS Publications. J-Electrochem Soc 149(12):S85–S85CrossRef

82.

Pourbaix M (1984) Electrochemical corrosion of metallic biomaterials. Biomaterials 5(3):122–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(84)90046-2CrossRef

83.

Rechnitz GA (1963) Controlled-potential analysis, vol 13. Oxford, Oxford

84.

Silverman D, Revie W (2000) Uhlig’s Corrosion Handbook. Wiley, New York

85.

Jha S et al (2020) Design and synthesis of lignin-based flexible supercapacitors. ACS Sustaine Chem Eng 8(1):498–511. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b05880CrossRef

86.

Jha S et al () Design and synthesis of high performance flexible and green supercapacitors ma2020de of manganese-dioxide-decorated alkali lignin 2(5):e184. https://doi.org/10.1002/est2.184

87.

Esmailzadeh S, Aliofkhazraei M, Sarlak H (2018) Interpretation of cyclic potentiodynamic polarization test results for study of corrosion behavior of metals: a review. Protect Metals Phys Chem Surf 54(5):976–989. https://doi.org/10.1134/S207020511805026XCrossRef

88.

Bellezze T, Giuliani G, Roventi G (2018) Study of stainless steels corrosion in a strong acid mixture. Part 1: cyclic potentiodynamic polarization curves examined by means of an analytical method. Corros Sci 130:113–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2017.10.012CrossRef

89.

Bellezze T et al (2018) Study of stainless steels corrosion in a strong acid mixture. Part 2: anodic selective dissolution, weight loss and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy tests. Corros Sci 130:12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2017.10.010CrossRef

90.

Zhang B et al (2019) Pitting corrosion of SLM Inconel 718 sample under surface and heat treatments. Appl Surf Sci 490:556–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.06.043CrossRef

91.

Wang Y, Chen X (2019) Investigation on the microstructure and corrosion properties of Inconel 625 alloy fabricated by wire arc additive manufacturing. Mater Res Express 6(10):106568. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab39f6MathSciNetCrossRef

92.

Foley R (1986) Localized corrosion of aluminum alloys—a review. Corrosion 42(5):277–288. https://doi.org/10.5006/1.3584905CrossRef

93.

Frankel G, Sridhar N (2008) Understanding localized corrosion. Mater Today 11(10):38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(08)70206-2CrossRef

94.

Sato N (1995) The stability of localized corrosion. Corros Sci 37(12):1947–1967. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-938X(95)00076-VCrossRef

95.

Hladky K, Dawson J (1981) The measurement of localized corrosion using electrochemical noise. Corros Sci 21(4):317–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-938X(81)90006-8CrossRef

96.

Li X et al (2020) Graphene-strengthened Inconel 625 alloy fabricated by selective laser melting. Mater Sci Eng A 798:140099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.140099CrossRef

97.

Sun R et al (2021) Microstructure, element segregation and performance of Inconel 625 metal layer deposited by laser assisted ultra-high frequency induction deposition. Surf Coat Technol 405:126715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126715CrossRef

98.

Luo S et al (2019) Microstructural evolution and corrosion behaviors of Inconel 718 alloy produced by selective laser melting following different heat treatments. Addit Manuf 30:100875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.100875CrossRef

99.

Klapper HS et al (2017) Critical Factors Affecting the Pitting Corrosion Resistance of Additively Manufactured Nickel Alloy in Chloride Containing Environments. In: CORROSION 2017. NACE International

100.

Li H et al (2018) Effect of heat treatment on the δ phase distribution and corrosion resistance of selective laser melting manufactured Inconel 718 superalloy. 69(10): 1350–1354. https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.201810159

101.

Mythreyi OV et al (2020) Corrosion study of selective laser melted IN718 alloy upon post heat treatment and shot peening 10(12):1562. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10121562

102.

Kong D et al (2019) Effect of TiC content on the mechanical and corrosion properties of Inconel 718 alloy fabricated by a high-throughput dual-feed laser metal deposition system. J Alloys Compds 803:637–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.06.317CrossRef

103.

Cabrini M et al (2019) Evaluation of corrosion resistance of alloy 625 obtained by laser powder bed fusion 166(11): 3399. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0471911jes

104.

Lefky CS et al (2019) Microstructure and corrosion properties of sensitized laser powder bed fusion printed Inconel 718 to dissolve support structures in a self-terminating manner. Addit Manuf 27:526–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.020CrossRef

105.

Kong D et al (2019) Anisotropic response in mechanical and corrosion properties of hastelloy X fabricated by selective laser melting. Constr Build Mater 221:720–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.132CrossRef

106.

Zhang LN, Ojo OA (2020) Corrosion behavior of wire arc additive manufactured Inconel 718 superalloy. J Alloys Compds 829:154455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154455CrossRef

107.

Asala G, Andersson J, Ojo OA (2019) Hot corrosion behaviour of wire-arc additive manufactured Ni-based superalloy ATI 718Plus®. Corros Sci 158:108086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2019.07.010CrossRef

108.

Basak S et al (2019) Surface modification of structural material for nuclear applications by electron beam melting: enhancement of microstructural and corrosion properties of Inconel 617. SN Appl Sci 1(7):708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0744-5CrossRef

109.

You X et al (2016) Preparation of Inconel 740 superalloy by electron beam smelting. J Alloys Compds. 676:202–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.03.140CrossRef

110.

You X et al (2018) Effect of solution heat treatment on microstructure and electrochemical behavior of electron beam smelted Inconel 718 superalloy. J Alloys Compds. 741:792–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.01.159CrossRef

111.

Karimi P et al (2020) Effect of build location on microstructural characteristics and corrosion behavior of EB-PBF built Alloy 718. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106(7):3597–3607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04859-9CrossRef

112.

Xu W et al (2015) Additive manufacturing of strong and ductile Ti–6Al–4V by selective laser melting via in situ martensite decomposition. Acta Mater 85:74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.11.028CrossRef

113.

Tian Y et al (2014) Rationalization of microstructure heterogeneity in INCONEL 718 builds made by the direct laser additive manufacturing process. Metal Mater Trans A. 45(10):4470–4483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-014-2370-6CrossRef

114.

Jha S, Ponce V, Seminario JM (2018) Investigating the effects of vacancies on self-diffusion in silicon clusters using classical molecular dynamics. J Mol Model 24(10):290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-018-3814-5CrossRef

115.

Lesyk DA et al (2020) Post-processing of the Inconel 718 alloy parts fabricated by selective laser melting: effects of mechanical surface treatments on surface topography, porosity, hardness and residual stress. Surf Coat Technol 381:125136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.125136CrossRef

116.

Mancisidor A et al (2016) Reduction of the residual porosity in parts manufactured by selective laser melting using skywriting and high focus offset strategies 83:864–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2016.08.090

117.

Mukherjee T, DebRoy T (2018) Mitigation of lack of fusion defects in powder bed fusion additive manufacturing. J Manuf Process 36:442–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.10.028CrossRef

118.

Schnur C (2019) Electron Beam - Powder Bed Fusion Of Alloy 718: Influences Of Contour Parameters On Surface And Microstructural Characteristics, p 41

119.

Ali H et al (2018) Effect of scanning strategies on residual stress and mechanical properties of Selective Laser Melted Ti6Al4V 712:175–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.11.103

120.

Lu Y et al (2015) Study on the microstructure, mechanical property and residual stress of SLM Inconel-718 alloy manufactured by differing island scanning strategy 75:197–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2015.07.009

121.

Liu Y, Yang Y, Wang D (2016) A study on the residual stress during selective laser melting (SLM) of metallic powder. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87(1):647–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8466-yCrossRef

122.

Enrique PD et al (2019) Surface modification of binder-jet additive manufactured Inconel 625 via electrospark deposition. Surf Coat Technol 362:141–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.01.108CrossRef

123.

Zhang B, Li Y, Bai Q (2017) Defect formation mechanisms in selective laser melting: a review. Chin J Mech Eng 30(3):515–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10033-017-0121-5CrossRef

124.

(2014) Effect of Aging Treatment on Pitting Corrosion and Corrosion Fatigue Crack Propagation Behavior of Oil-Grade Alloy 718. In: 8th International Symposium on Superalloy 718 and Derivatives, 643–658. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119016854.ch50

125.

Osoba LO, Oladoye AM, Ogbonna VE (2019) Corrosion evaluation of superalloys Haynes 282 and Inconel 718 in Hydrochloric acid. J Alloys Compds 804:376–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.06.196CrossRef

Title: Corrosion of nickel-based alloys fabricated through additive manufacturing: a review
Authors: Siddhi Mehta
Swarn Jha
Hong Liang
Publication date: 21-04-2022
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Published in: Progress in Additive Manufacturing / Issue 6/2022
Print ISSN: 2363-9512
Electronic ISSN: 2363-9520
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-022-00298-3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 6/2022

Multimodal freezing system for cryogenic 3D printing

Optimization of time-variant laser power in a cladding process

Capability to detect and localize typical defects of laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) process: an experimental investigation with different non-destructive techniques

Prediction modeling and parameters’ optimization of gas–powder flow convergence in coaxial powder feeding nozzles based on CFD–DEM simulation

Mechanical properties of the FFF sandwich-structured parts made of PLA/TPU multi-material

Influence of post-heat treatments on microstructural and mechanical properties of LPBF-processed Ti6Al4V alloy

Premium Partners