Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Wireless Networks
Published in: Wireless Networks 5/2019

10-04-2019

Delay Tolerant Network assisted flying Ad-Hoc network scenario: modeling and analytical perspective

Authors: Amartya Mukherjee, Nilanjan Dey, Rajesh Kumar, B. K. Panigrahi, Aboul Ella Hassanien, João Manuel R. S. Tavares

Published in: Wireless Networks | Issue 5/2019

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Flying Ad-Hoc networks (FANET) are the extended paradigm of the mobile Ad-Hoc networks and, perhaps, one of the most emerging research domains in the current era. A huge number of tangible applications have been developed in this domain. The main advantages of such networks are their easy deployment, scalability, and robustness. However, the sparseness of these networks is an inherent characteristic that is known to be a bottleneck. The main objective of this work was to provide an alternative solution for the intermittently connected FANET by considering the philosophy of the Delay Tolerant Network (DTN) approach. To realize the functionality of the DTN protocols in a three-dimensional (3D) space, a social FANET model is proposed. FANET nodes are supposed to have a sparse node density. Fundamentally, the proposed DTN assisted Flying Ad hoc Network exploits the DTN routing and mobility features. The new mobility modeling for 3D spaces was re-engineered and tested with well-known routing protocols to analyze the performance of the model based on node speed, density, buffer, latency, message overhead, and power consumption. The effectiveness of 3D mobility models has also been compared against the one of classical models. The obtained results reflect a significant enhanced performance of the suggested DTN protocol for sparse FANET in a social scenario.
previous article Bhattacharyya distance criterion based multibit quantizer design for cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks
next article : An acknowledgement-based mobile sink routing protocol with rechargeable sensors for wireless sensor networks

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Literature
1.
2.
Dey, N., & Mukherjee, A. (2016). Embedded systems and robotics with open source tools. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
3.
Bekmezci, I., Sahingoz, O. K., & Temel, Ş. (2013). Flying ad-hoc networks (FANETs): A survey. Ad Hoc Networks, 11(3), 1254–1270.CrossRef
4.
Kumari, K., Sah, B., & Maakar, S. (2015). A survey: Different mobility model for FANET. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 5(6), 1170–1173.
5.
Sahingoz, O. K. (2014). Networking models in flying ad-hoc networks (FANETs): Concepts and challenges. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, 74(1–2), 513–527.CrossRef
6.
Zheng, Z., Sangaiah, A. K., & Wang, T. (2018). Adaptive communication protocols in flying ad hoc network. IEEE Communications Magazine, 56(1), 136–142.CrossRef
7.
Lewis, M., Templin, F., Bellur, B., & Ogier, R. (2002). Topology broadcast based on reverse-path forwarding (TBRPF). Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) draft, draft-ietf-manettbrpf-06. txt.
8.
Zhang, X., Cao, X., Yan, L., & Sung, D. (2016). A street-centric opportunistic routing protocol based on link correlation for urban vanets. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 1, 1.
9.
Oubbati, O. S., Lakas, A., Zhou, F., Güneş, M., & Yagoubi, M. B. (2017). A survey on position-based routing protocols for Flying Ad hoc Networks (FANETs). Vehicular Communications, 10, 29–56.CrossRef
10.
Oubbati, O. S., Lakas, A., Zhou, F., Güneş, M., Lagraa, N., & Yagoubi, M. B. (2017). Intelligent UAV-assisted routing protocol for urban VANETs. Computer Communications, 107, 93–111.CrossRef
11.
Singh, H., & Rana, P. S. G. (2017). An emergency message dissemination protocol using greedy forwarding technique and clustering for VANETS. Ph.D. dissertation, 2017.
12.
Cui, B., & Li, R. (2017). A greedy and neighbor aware data forwarding protocol in named data MANETs. In 2017 ninth international conference on ubiquitous and future networks (ICUFN) (pp. 934–939). IEEE, 2017.
13.
Maxa, J.-A., Mahmoud, M.-S. B., & Larrieu, N. (2017). Survey on uaanet routing protocols and network security challenges. Ad Hoc & Sensor Wireless Networks, 37(1–4), 231–320.
14.
Khan, I. L., Hussain, R., Iqbal, A., Shakeel, A., Alvi, S., Abbas, W., et al. (2018). Design and evaluation of self organizing, collision free MAC protocol for distributed cognitive radio networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 99(2), 1081–1101.CrossRef
15.
Rosário, D., Arnaldo Filho, J., Rosário, D., Santosy, A., & Gerla, M. (2017). A relay placement mechanism based on UAV mobility for satisfactory video transmissions. In Ad hoc networking workshop (Med-Hoc-Net), 2017 16th annual mediterranean (pp. 1–8). IEEE, 2017.
16.
Patra, S., Balaji, A., Saha, S., Mukherjee, A., & Nandi, S. (2011). A qualitative survey on unicast routing algorithms in delay tolerant networks. In V. V. Das, G. Thomas & F. L. Gaol (Eds.), Information technology and mobile communication (pp. 291–296). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
17.
18.
Han, G., Zhou, L., Wang, H., Zhang, W., & Chan, S. (2018). A source location protection protocol based on dynamic routing in WSNs for the social internet of things. Future Generation Computer Systems, 82, 689–697.CrossRef
19.
Bujari, A., Palazzi, C. E., & Ronzani, D. (2018). A comparison of stateless position-based packet routing algorithms for FANETs. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 1, 1.
20.
Amjad, K., & Stocker, A. J. (2010). Impact of node density and mobility on the performance of AODV and DSR in MANETS. In 2010 7th international symposium on communication systems networks and digital signal processing (CSNDSP) (pp. 61–65). IEEE, 2010.
21.
Mukherjee, A., Chakraborty, S., Azar, A. T., Bhattacharyay, S. K., Chatterjee, B., & Dey, N. (2014). Unmanned aerial system for post disaster identification. In 2014 international conference on circuits, communication, control and computing (I4C) (pp. 247–252). IEEE, 2014.
22.
Priyan, M. K., & Devi, G. U. (2017). Energy efficient node selection algorithm based on node performance index and random waypoint mobility model in internet of vehicles. Cluster Computing, 21(1), 1–15.
23.
Deng, S., Huang, L., Taheri, J., Yin, J., Zhou, M., & Zomaya, A. Y. (2017). Mobility-aware service composition in mobile communities. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 47(3), 555–568.CrossRef
24.
Ren, J., Zhang, G., & Li, D. (2017). Multicast capacity for VANETs with directional antenna and delay constraint under random walk mobility model. IEEE Access, 5, 3958–3970.CrossRef
25.
Mukherjee, A., Dey, N., Kausar, N., Ashour, A. S., Taiar, R., & Hassanien, A. E. (2016). A disaster management specific mobility model for flying ad-hoc network. International Journal of Rough Sets and Data Analysis (IJRSDA), 3(3), 72–103.CrossRef
26.
Hayat, S., Yanmaz, E., & Muzaffar, R. (2016). Survey on unmanned aerial vehicle networks for civil applications: A communications viewpoint. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 18(4), 2624–2661.CrossRef
27.
He, R., Ai, B., Stüber, G. L., & Zhong, Z. (2017). Non-stationary mobile-to-mobile channel modeling using the Gauss–Markov mobility model. In 2017 9th international conference on wireless communications and signal processing (WCSP) (pp. 1–6). IEEE, 2017.
28.
Broyles, D., Jabbar, A., & Sterbenz, J. P. G. (2010). Design and analysis of a 3–D Gauss–Markov mobility model for highly-dynamic airborne networks. In Proceedings of the international telemetering conference (ITC), (San Diego, CA). 2010.
29.
Li, X., Zhang, T., & Li, J. (2017). A particle swarm mobility model for flying ad hoc networks. In GLOBECOM 2017–2017 IEEE global communications conference (pp. 1–6). IEEE, 2017.
30.
Li, X., & Zhang, T. (2016). STGM: A spatiotemporally correlated group mobility model for flying ad hoc networks. In International conference on communications and networking in China (pp. 391–400). Cham: Springer, 2016.
31.
Bouachir, O., Abrassart, A., Garcia, F., & Larrieu, N. (2014). A mobility model for UAV ad hoc network. In 2014 international conference on unmanned aircraft systems (ICUAS) (pp. 383–388). IEEE, 2014.
32.
Radu, D., Cretu, A., Parrein, B., Yi, J., Avram, C., & Aştilean, A. (2018). Flying ad hoc network for emergency applications connected to a fog system. In International conference on emerging internetworking, data & web technologies (pp. 675–686). Cham: Springer, 2018.
33.
Rosati, S., Krużelecki, K., Heitz, G., Floreano, D., & Rimoldi, B. (2016). Dynamic routing for flying ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 65(3), 1690–1700.CrossRef
34.
Le, M., Park, J.-S., & Gerla, M. (2006). UAV assisted disruption tolerant routing. In Military communications conference, 2006. MILCOM 2006. IEEE (pp. 1–5). IEEE, 2006.
35.
Messous, M.-A., Senouci, S.-M., & Sedjelmaci, H. (2016). Network connectivity and area coverage for UAV fleet mobility model with energy constraint. In Wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC), 2016 IEEE (pp. 1–6). IEEE, 2016.
36.
Zacarias, I., Gaspary, L. P., Kohl, A., Fernandes, R. Q., Stocchero, J. M., & de Freitas, E. P. (2017). Combining software-defined and delay-tolerant approaches in last-mile tactical edge networking. IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(10), 22–29.CrossRef
37.
Sánchez-García, J., Reina, D. G., & Toral, S. L. (2019). A distributed PSO-based exploration algorithm for a UAV network assisting a disaster scenario. Future Generation Computer Systems, 90, 129–148.CrossRef
38.
Karmakar, G., Kamruzzaman, J., & Nowsheen, N. (2018). An efficient data delivery mechanism for AUV-based Ad hoc UASNs. Future Generation Computer Systems, 86, 1193–1208.CrossRef
39.
Kerrache, C. A., Barka, E., Lagraa, N., & Lakas, A. (2017). Reputation-aware energy-efficient solution for FANET monitoring. In Wireless and mobile networking conference (WMNC), 2017 10th IFIP (pp. 1–6). IEEE, 2017.
40.
De Vit, A. R. D., Marcon, C., Nunes, R. C., Webber, T., Sanchez, G., & Rolim, C. O. (2018). Energy saving on DTN using trajectory inference model. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM symposium on applied computing (pp. 2132–2135). ACM, 2018.
41.
Zhou, H., Leung, V. C., Zhu, C., Xu, S., & Fan, J. (2017). Predicting temporal social contact patterns for data forwarding in opportunistic mobile networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 66(11), 10372–10383.CrossRef
42.
Guo, S., He, L., Gu, Y., Jiang, B., & He, T. (2014). Opportunistic flooding in low-duty-cycle wireless sensor networks with unreliable links. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 63(11), 2787–2802.MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
43.
Zhang, X., Neglia, G., Kurose, J., & Towsley, D. (2007). Performance modeling of epidemic routing. Computer Networks, 51(10), 2867–2891.MATHCrossRef
44.
Lindgren, A., Doria, A., Davies, E., & Grasic, S. (2012). Probabilistic routing protocol for intermittently connected networks. No. RFC 6693. 2012.
45.
Spyropoulos, T., Psounis, K., & Raghavendra, C. S. (2005). Spray and wait: An efficient routing scheme for intermittently connected mobile networks. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCOMM workshop on delay-tolerant networking (pp. 252–259). ACM, 2005.
46.
Burgess, J., Gallagher, B., Jensen, D. D., & Levine, B. N. (2006). Maxprop: Routing for vehicle-based disruption-tolerant networks. In INFOCOM 2006. 25th IEEE international conference on computer communications. proceedings (pp. 1–11). IEEE, 2006.
47.
Camp, T., Boleng, J., & Davies, V. (2002). A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2(5), 483–502.CrossRef
48.
González, R., Jayakumar, P., & Iagnemma, K. (2017). Stochastic mobility prediction of ground vehicles over large spatial regions: A geostatistical approach. Autonomous Robots, 41(2), 311–331.CrossRef
49.
Keränen, A., Ott, J., & Kärkkäinen, T. (2009). The ONE simulator for DTN protocol evaluation. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on simulation tools and techniques (p. 55). ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering), 2009.
50.
Abdelkader, T., Naik, K., Nayak, A., Goel, N., & Srivastava, V. (2016). A performance comparison of delay-tolerant network routing protocols. IEEE Network, 30(2), 46–53.CrossRef
51.
Cabacas, R. A., Nakamura, H., & Ra, I.-H. (2014). Energy consumption analysis of delay tolerant network routing protocols. International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications, 8(2), 1–10.
52.
Ahmad, K., Fathima, M., Jain, V., & Fathima, A. (2017). FUZZY-Prophet: A novel routing protocol for opportunistic network. International Journal of Information Technology, 9(2), 121–127.CrossRef
53.
Ferreira, D. L., Nunes, B. A. A., & Obraczka, K. (2018). Scale-free properties of human mobility and applications to intelligent transportation systems. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 19(11), 3736–3748.CrossRef
54.
Basta, N., ElNahas, A., Grossmann, H. P., & Abdennadher, S. (2018). Guess where I go?: A mobility predictor for smart vehicles. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on mobile and ubiquitous multimedia (pp. 93–102). ACM, 2018.
55.
Ghouti, L. (2016). Mobility prediction in mobile ad hoc networks using neural learning machines. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 66, 104–121.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Delay Tolerant Network assisted flying Ad-Hoc network scenario: modeling and analytical perspective
Authors
Amartya Mukherjee
Nilanjan Dey
Rajesh Kumar
B. K. Panigrahi
Aboul Ella Hassanien
João Manuel R. S. Tavares
Publication date
10-04-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Wireless Networks / Issue 5/2019
Print ISSN: 1022-0038
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8196
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-019-01987-8

Other articles of this Issue 5/2019

Wireless Networks 5/2019 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Expected distortion of simultaneous transmission of multiple source symbols with multicarrier frequency hopping modulation

OriginalPaper

Exploring network-level performances of wireless nanonetworks utilizing gains of different types of nano-antennas with different materials

OriginalPaper

Hybrid routing scheme using imperialist competitive algorithm and RBF neural networks for VANETs

OriginalPaper

A practical sleep coordination and management scheme with duty cycle control for energy sustainable IEEE 802.11s wireless mesh networks

OriginalPaper

Throughput analysis of wireless-powered decode-and-forward relay systems with interference

OriginalPaper

Power control games for multi-user anti-jamming communications