Top

Wireless Networks

Published in:

14-05-2020

Efficient fault-tolerant routing in IoT wireless sensor networks based on path graph flow modeling with Marchenko–Pastur distribution (EFT-PMD)

Authors: S. Sivakumar, P. Vivekanandan

Published in: Wireless Networks | Issue 6/2020

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

In the internet of things (IoT) based wireless sensor network (WSN), the nodes are scattered to segregate the rapt data in the relevant field of application. In general, sensor nodes of IoT possess heterogeneous property and display cluster-based routing to transmit the data as it is considered as an efficient routing method. When one or more cluster heads (CHs) fail, the sensed data of sensor nodes that are currently serving cannot be forwarded by the faulty CHs. Consequently, data of the IoT application will not be sufficiently sensed by the sink node (gateway). As a result, information processing of this field will be affected profusely. This paper focuses on the development of a paired cluster fault-tolerant disjoint path routing in a path graph and a novel approach to solve this dilemma in polynomial time of the degree of the graph. The objective of this proposed IoT–WSN architecture is to diminish the latency, end-to-end delay as well as energy consumption and thereby improving the performance in terms of throughput and packet delivery ratio. The performance of this proposed method in IoT–WSN network is measured and affirmed using benchmark network simulator.

previous article SEP of the M-ary -QAM signals under fading and AWGN noise in a communication system using spatial diversity

next article Coverage aware face topology structure for wireless sensor network applications

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Akyildiz, I. F., Su, W., & Sankarasubramaniam, Y. (2002). Wireless sensor networks: A survey. Computer Networks,38, 393–398.

Abbasi, A. H., & Younis, M. (2007). A survey on clustering algorithms for wireless sensor networks. Computer Communication,30, 38–41.

Chugh, A., & Panda, S. (2018). Strengthening clustering through relay nodes in sensor networks. Procedia Computer Science,132, 689–695.

Aziz, B. (2018). Towards a mutation analysis of IoT protocols. Information and Software Technology,100, 183–184.

Al-Fuqaha, A., Guizani, M., Mohammadi, M., Aledhari, M., & Ayyash, M. (2015). Internet of things: A survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications. IEEE Communication Surveys and Tutorials,17(4), 2347–2376.

Bauer, M., Boussard, M., Bui, N., Loof, J., Magerkurth, C., Meissner, S., et al. (2013). IoT reference architecture, Chapter 8. Enabling things to talk. Berlin: Springer.

Mosharaf, C., Muntasir, R. R., & Raouf, B. (2012). ViNEYard: Virtual network embedding algorithms with coordinated node and link mapping. IEEE Transactions on Networking,20(1), 206–219.

Fischer, A., Botero, J. F., Till Beck, M., de Meer, H., & Hesselbach, X. (2013). Virtual network embedding: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials,15(4), 1888–1906.

Zhang, S., Qian, Z., Wu, J., Lu, S., & Epstein, L. (2014). Virtual network embedding with opportunistic resource sharing. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems,25(3), 816–827.

10.

Guo, B., Qiao, C., Wang, J., Yu, H., Zuo, Y., Li, J., et al. (2014). Survivable virtual network design and embedding to survive a facility node failure. Journal of Lightwave Technology,32(3), 483–493.

11.

Ishaq, I., Hoebeke, J., Moerman, I., & Demeester, P. (2012). Internet of things virtual networks: Bringing network virtualization to resource constrained devices. In IEEE international journal on green computing and communications (pp. 293–300).

12.

Khan, I., Belqasmi, F., Glitho, R., Crespi, N., Morrow, M., & Polakos, P. (2015). Wireless sensor network virtualization: Early architecture and research perspectives. IEEE Network,29(3), 104–112.

13.

Ding, M., Chen, D., Xing, K., & Cheng, X. (2005). Localized fault-tolerant event boundary detection in sensor networks. In Proceeding of the 24th annual joint conference of the IEEE computer and communications societies (INFOCOM 105). Miami, USA.

14.

Khadivi, A., & Shiva, M. (2006). FTPASC: A fault tolerant power aware protocol with static clustering for wireless sensor networks. In IEEE international journal on swireless and mobile computing, networking and communications.

15.

Cheraghlou, M. N., Khadem-Zadeh, A., & Haghparast, M. (2017). Increasing lifetime and fault tolerance capability in wireless sensor networks by providing a novel management framework. Wireless Personal Communications,92(2), 603–622.

16.

Guan, Z., Gao, Z., Yang, Y., Li, Y., & Qiu, X. (2010). A distributed fault recovery method in clustering-based wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of AIAI2010, state key laboratory of networking and switching technology. Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China.

17.

Shalma, H., & Rajesh, R. (2014). Dynamic cluster based energy controlled routing in wireless sensor network. In ICICES2014. S.A. Engineering College, Chennai, TamilNadu, India.

18.

Huang, J. M, Tai, S. C, & Chen, K. H. (2009). CRINet: A secure and fault-tolerant data collection scheme using 3-way forwarding and group key management in wireless sensor networks. In IEEE wireless telecommunications symposium (pp. 1–6).

19.

Man, K. L, Chen, C., & Hughes, D. (2010). Decentralized fault detection and management for wireless sensor networks. In IEEE journal on future information technology (pp. 1–6).

20.

Sampathkumar, A., Rastogi, R., Arukonda, S., Shankar, A., Kautish, S., & Sivaram, M. (2020). An efficient hybrid methodology for detection of cancer-causing gene using CSC for micro array data. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing,32(3), 483–493.

21.

Maheswar, R., & Kanagachidambaresan, G. R. (2020). Sustainable development through internet of things. Wireless Networks,26(5), 2305–2306.

22.

Thirumoorthy, P., Kalyanasundaram, P., Maheswar, R., et al. (2019). Time-critical energy minimization protocol using PQM (TCEM-PQM) for wireless body sensor network. J Supercomputers,32(3), 483–493.

23.

Jayarajan, P., Kanagachidambaresan, G. R., Sundararajan, T. V. P., et al. (2018). An energy-aware buffer management (EABM) routing protocol for WSN. J Supercomputers,42(6), 690–695.

24.

Jayarajan, P., Maheswar, R., & Kanagachidambaresan, G. R. (2019). Modified energy minimization scheme using queue threshold based on priority queueing model. Cluster Computing,22, 12111–12118.

25.

Jayarajan, P., Maheswar, R., Kanagachidambaresan, G. R., Sivasankaran, V., Balaji, M. & Das, J. (2018). Performance evaluation of fault nodes using queue threshold based on N-policy priority queueing model. In 2018 9th international conference on computing, communication and networking technologies (ICCCNT) (pp. 1–5). Bangalore.

26.

Maheswar, R., & Jayaparvathy, R. (2012). Performance analysis of fault tolerant node in wireless sensor network. In V. V. Das & J. Stephen (Eds.), Advances in communication, network, and computing, CNC. Berlin: Springer.

27.

Sundararajan, T. V. P., Sumithra, M. G., & Maheswar, R. (2014). A novel smart routing protocol for remote health monitoring in medical wireless networks. Journal of Health Care Engineering, Multi-Science Publications,5, 1–28.

28.

Abbasi, A. A., Younis, M. F., & Baroudi, U. A. (2015). Recovering from a node failure in wireless sensor-actor networks with minimal topology changes. IEEE Transaction on Vehicular Technology,8, 256–271.

29.

Liu, L., et al. (2019). Fault-tolerant event region detection on trajectory pattern extraction for industrial wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics,32(3), 483–493.

30.

Mohapatra, H., & Rath, A. K. (2019). Fault-tolerant mechanism for wireless sensor network. IET Wireless Sensor Systems,18(8), 390–395.

31.

Mohapatra, H., & Rath, A. K. (2019). Fault tolerance in WSN through PE-LEACH protocol. IET Wireless Sensor Systems,32(3), 358–365.

32.

Li, H., et al. (2019). BIM2RT: BWAS-immune mechanism based multipath reliable transmission with fault tolerance in wireless sensor networks. Journal on Swarm and Evolutionary Computation,47, 44–55.

33.

Malathy, S., Porkodi, V., Sampathkumar, A., NourHindia, M. H. D., Dimyati, K., Tilwari, V., et al. (2019). An optimal network coding based backpressure routing approach for massive IoT network. Wireless Networks,10(3), 189–197.

34.

Sampathkumar, A., Mulerikkal, J., & Sivaram, M. (2020). Glowworm swarm optimization for effectual load balancing and routing strategies in wireless sensor networks. Wireless Networks. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-020-02336-w.

35.

Sampathkumar, A., Murugan, S., Rastogi, R., Mishra, M. K., Malathy, S., & Manikandan, R. (2020). Energy efficient ACPI and JEHDO mechanism for IoT device energy management in healthcare. In G. Kanagachidambaresan, R. Maheswar, V. Manikandan, & K. Ramakrishnan (Eds.), Internet of things in smart technologies for sustainable urban development. EAI/springer innovations in communication and computing. Cham: Springer.

Title: Efficient fault-tolerant routing in IoT wireless sensor networks based on path graph flow modeling with Marchenko–Pastur distribution (EFT-PMD)
Authors: S. Sivakumar
P. Vivekanandan
Publication date: 14-05-2020
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Wireless Networks / Issue 6/2020
Print ISSN: 1022-0038
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8196
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-020-02359-3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 6/2020

RLProph: a dynamic programming based reinforcement learning approach for optimal routing in opportunistic IoT networks

EDMARA2: a hierarchical routing protocol for EH-WSNs

Joint optimization of power control and time slot allocation for wireless body area networks via deep reinforcement learning

Improving IEEE 802.15.4 performance with a switched Gold sequence chip formation

A novel efficient clustering protocol for energy harvesting in wireless sensor networks

Security offloading network system for expanded security coverage in IPv6-based resource constrained data service networks