Top

Journal of Science Education and Technology

Published in:

23-10-2017

EvoBuild: A Quickstart Toolkit for Programming Agent-Based Models of Evolutionary Processes

Authors: Aditi Wagh, Uri Wilensky

Published in: Journal of Science Education and Technology | Issue 2/2018

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Extensive research has shown that one of the benefits of programming to learn about scientific phenomena is that it facilitates learning about mechanisms underlying the phenomenon. However, using programming activities in classrooms is associated with costs such as requiring additional time to learn to program or students needing prior experience with programming. This paper presents a class of programming environments that we call quickstart: Environments with a negligible threshold for entry into programming and a modest ceiling. We posit that such environments can provide benefits of programming for learning without incurring associated costs for novice programmers. To make this claim, we present a design-based research study conducted to compare programming models of evolutionary processes with a quickstart toolkit with exploring pre-built models of the same processes. The study was conducted in six seventh grade science classes in two schools. Students in the programming condition used EvoBuild, a quickstart toolkit for programming agent-based models of evolutionary processes, to build their NetLogo models. Students in the exploration condition used pre-built NetLogo models. We demonstrate that although students came from a range of academic backgrounds without prior programming experience, and all students spent the same number of class periods on the activities including the time students took to learn programming in this environment, EvoBuild students showed greater learning about evolutionary mechanisms. We discuss the implications of this work for design research on programming environments in K-12 science education.

previous article Exploring the Use of Electroencephalography to Gather Objective Evidence of Cognitive Processing During Problem Solving

next article Examining Educational Climate Change Technology: How Group Inquiry Work with Realistic Scientific Technology Alters Classroom Learning

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Available only for authorised users

In a NetLogo model, a tick denotes a unit of time.

The names of schools are pseudonyms.

Student responses have been transcribed as is from their writing, retaining grammatical or spelling errors.

This was the name of the grassland for the re-run of Experiment 1, which was a camouflage experiment.

Model rules were presented to EvoExplore students through a teacher demonstration at the start of the activity. They were also accessible on student worksheets.

Bamberger, J. (2001). Turning Music Theory on its Ear: Do we hear what we see; do we see what we say? In Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Musicality: The Seashore Symposium. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.

Blikstein, P., & Wilensky, U. (2009). An atom is known by the company it keeps: A constructionist learning environment for materials science using multi-agent simulation. Int J Comput Math Learn, 14(1), 81–119.CrossRef

Bruckman, A. (1997). Moose Crossing: Construction, Community, and Learning in a Networked Virtual World for Kids. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Centola, D., Wilensky, U., & McKenzie, E. (2000). A Hands-on Mondeling Approach to Evolution: Learning about the Evolution of Cooperation and Altruism through Multi-Agent Modeling- The EACH Project. In Fourth Annual International Conference of the Learning Sciences. Ann Arbor.

Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues. J Learn Sci, 13(1), 15–42. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301.CrossRef

Dickes, A. C., & Sengupta, P. (2013). Learning Natural Selection in 4th Grade with Multi-Agent-Based Computational Models. Res Sci Educ, 43(3), 921–953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9293-2.CrossRef

Edwards, L. D. (1995). Microworlds as Representations. In A. A. diSessa, C. Hoyles, R. Noss, & L. D. Edwards (Eds.), Computers and Exploratory Learning (pp. 127–154). Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-57799-4_8.CrossRef

Harel, I., & Papert, S. (1991). Constructionism : research reports and essays, 1985-1990. Norwood: Ablex Pub. Corp.

Horn, M., & Wilensky, U. (2011). NetTango 1.0. Evanston, IL: Center for Connected Learning and Computer-based Modeling, Northwestern University.

Horn, M. S., Brady, C., Hjorth, A., Wagh, A., & Wilensky, U. (2014). Frog Pond: A Codefirst Learning Environment on Evolution and Natural Selection. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 357–360). New York: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2593968.2610491.

Ioannidou, A., Repenning, A., Lewis, C., Cherry, G., & Rader, C. (2003). Making Constructionism Work in the Classroom. Int J Comput Math Learn, 8, 63–108.CrossRef

Kafai, Y. B., Carter Ching, C., & Marshall, S. (1997). Children as designers of educational multimedia software. Comput Educ, 29(2–3), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(97)00036-5.CrossRef

Kahn, K. (2007a). Building computer models from small pieces. In G. Wainer (Ed.), SCSC Proceedings of the 2007 Summer Computer Simulation Conference (pp. 931–936). San Diego.

Kahn, K. (2007b). The BehaviourComposer 2.0: a web-based tool for composing NetLogo code fragments. Retrieved July 5, 2013, from http://academia.edu/329330/The_BehaviourComposer_2.0_a_web-based_tool_for_composing_NetLogo_code_fragments

Kahn, K., & Noble, H. (2010). The BehaviourComposer 2.0: a web-based tool for composing NetLogo code fragments. In J. Clayson & I. Kalas (Eds.), Constructionist approaches to create learning, thinking and education: Lessons for the 21st century: Proceedings for Constructionism 2010. Paris.

Kahn, K., Noble, H., & Hjorth, A. (2012). Three-minute Constructionist Experiences. In C. Kynigos, J. Clayson, & Y. Nikoleta (Eds.), Proceedings of Constructionism 2012, Theory Practice and Impact (pp. 349–358). Athens.

Klopfer, E., Yoon, S., & Um, T. (2005). Teaching Complex Dynamic Systems to Young Students with StarLogo. J Comput Math Sci Teach, 24(2), 157–178.

Konold, C., & Miller, C. D. (2005). TinkerPlots: Dynamic data exploration. Computer Software. Emeryville: Key Curriculum Press Retrieved from http://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=5929212600541009408&hl=en&oi=scholarr.

Louca, L. T., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2007). The Use of Computer-based Programming Environments as Computer Modelling Tools in Early Science Education: The cases of textual and graphical program languages. Int J Sci Educ, 30(3), 287–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601188620.CrossRef

Metz, K. E. (2010). Scaffolding children’s understanding of the fit between organisms and their environment in the context of the practices of science. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences - Volume 1 (pp. 396–403). International Society of the Learning Sciences. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1854360.1854411.

NGSS Lead States (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books, Inc..

Rader, C., Cherry, G., Brand, A., Repenning, A., & Lewis, C. (1998). Principles to Scaffold Mixed Textual and Iconic End-User Programming Languages. In Proceedings of the 1998 I.E. Symposium of Visual Languages (pp. 187–194). Nova Scotia.

Repenning, A., & Sumner, T. (1995). Agentsheets: a medium for creating domain-oriented visual languages. Computer, 28(3), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1109/2.366152.CrossRef

Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernandez, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., Millner, A., Rosenbaum, E., Silver, J., Silverman, B. & Kafai, Y. (2009). Scratch: Programming for All. In Communications of the ACM (Vol. 52, pp. 60–67).

Sengupta, P., Kinnebrew, J. S., Basu, S., Biswas, G., & Clark, D. (2013). Integrating computational thinking with K-12 science education using agent-based computation: A theoretical framework. Education and Information Technologies, 18(2), 351–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9240-x.

Sherin, B. (2001). A Comparison of Programming Languages and Algebraic Notation as Expressive Languages for Physics. Int J Comput Math Learn, 6(1), 1–61. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011434026437.CrossRef

Simpson, G., Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (2005). Designing a programming-based approach for modelling scientific phenomena. J Comput Assist Learn, 21(2), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00121.x.CrossRef

Smith, D. C., Cypher, A., & Schmucker, K. (1996). Making Programming Easier for Children. Interactions, 3(5), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1145/234757.234764.CrossRef

Turkle, S., & Papert, S. (1992). Epistemological Pluralism and the Revaluation of the Concrete. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 11(1), 3–33.

Wagh, A. (2016). Building v/s Exploring Models: Comparing Learning of Evolutionary Processes through Agent-based Modeling (A dissertation). Northwestern University, Evanston.

Wagh, A., Cook-Whitt, K., & Wilensky, U. (2017). Bridging inquiry-based science and constructionism: Exploring the alignment between students tinkering with code of computational models and goals of inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21379

Wagh, A., & Wilensky, U. (2012a). Breeding birds to learn about artificial selection: Two birds with one stone? In: J. van Aalst, K. Thompson, M. Jacobson, & P. Reimann (Eds.), 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences: The Future of Learning (Vol. 2: Short papers, pp. 426–430). Sydney, Australia, July 2-6.

Wagh, A., & Wilensky, U. (2012b). Mechanistic Explanations of Evolutionary Change Facilitated by Agent-based Models. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, April 13-17.

Wagh, A., & Wilensky, U. (2013). Leveling the Playing Field: Making Multi-level Evolutionary Processes Accessible through Participatory Simulations. In N. Rummel, M. Kapur, M. Nathan, & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), To See the World and a Grain of Sand: Learning across Levels of Space, Time and Scale (Vol. 2, pp. 181–184). Madison, Wisconsin, June 15-19: Proceedings of CSCL.

Wagh, A., & Wilensky, U. (2014). Seeing patterns of change: Supporting student noticing in building models of natural selection. In G. Futschek & C. Kynigos (Eds.), Constructionism and Creativity, Proceedings of the 3rd International Constructionism Conference. Vienna: OCG (Österreichische Computer Gesellschaft).

Wagh, A., Novak, M., Soylu, F., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Integrating agent-based modeling & case Study to learn about population dynamics: A design framework. Paper presented at NARST, Baltimore, April 14-17.

Weintrop, D. (2015). Minding the Gap Between Blocks-Based and Text-Based Programming (Abstract Only). In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 720–720). New York: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2676723.2693622.

Wilensky, U. (1999a). GasLab—An extensible modeling toolkit for connecting micro- and macro- properties of gases. In N. Roberts, W. Feurzeig, & B. Hunter (Eds.), Computer Modeling in Science and Mathematics Education. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Wilensky, U. (1999b). NetLogo. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/ . Evanston: Center for Connected Learning and Computer-based Modeling, Northwestern University.

Wilensky, U. (2003). Statistical mechanics for secondary school: The GasLab modeling toolkit. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning[Special Issue on Agent-Based Modeling], 8(1), 1–41.

Wilensky, U., & Centola, D. (2007). Simulated Evolution: Facilitating Students’ Understanding of the Multiple Levels of Fitness through Multi-Agent Modeling. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Complex Systems. Nashua.

Wilensky, U., & Novak, M. (2010). Understanding evolution as an emergent process: Learning with agent-based models of evolutionary dynamcis. In R. Taylor & M. Ferrari (Eds.), Epistemology and Science Education: Understanding the Evolution vs. Intelligent Design Controversy. New York, Routledge.

Wilensky, U., & Reisman, K. (2006). Thinking like a wolf, a sheep, or a firefly: Learning biology through constructing and testing computational theories—An embodied modeling approach. Cogn Instr, 24(2), 171–209.CrossRef

Wilkerson, M., & Wilensky, U. (2010). Restructuring Change, Interpreting Changes: The DeltaTick Modeling and Analysis Toolkit. In J. Clayson & I. Kalas (Eds.), Proceedings of the Constructionism 2010 Conference. Paris, France. https://doi.org/Aug 10-14 .

Wilkerson, M. H., Gravel, B. E., & Macrander, C. A. (2014). Exploring Shifts in Middle School Learners’ Modeling Activity While Generating Drawings, Animations, and Computational Simulations of Molecular Diffusion. J Sci Educ Technol, 24(2–3), 396–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9497-5.

Wilkerson, M., Wagh, A., & Wilensky, U. (2015). Balancing Curricular and Pedagogical Needs in Computational Construction Kits: Lessons From the DeltaTick Project. Sci Educ, 99(3), 465–499. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21157.CrossRef

Xiang, L., & Passmore, C. (2010). The Use of an Agent-Based Programmable Modeling Tool in 8th Grade Students’ Model-Based Inquiry. Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology, 6(2), 130–147.

Yoon, S., Anderson, E., Klopfer, E., Koehler-Yom, J., Sheldon, J., Schoenfeld, I., Wendel, D., Scheintaub, H., Oztok, M., Evans, C., & Goh, S.-E. (2016). Designing Computer-supported Complex Systems Curricula for the Next Generation Science Standards in High School Science Classrooms. Systems, 4(4).

Title: EvoBuild: A Quickstart Toolkit for Programming Agent-Based Models of Evolutionary Processes
Authors: Aditi Wagh
Uri Wilensky
Publication date: 23-10-2017
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: Journal of Science Education and Technology / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1059-0145
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1839
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9713-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Beliefs and Attitudes about Science and Mathematics in Pre-Service Elementary Teachers, STEM, and Non-STEM Majors in Undergraduate Physics Courses

Mentoring and Argumentation in a Game-Infused Science Curriculum

Integrating Various Apps on BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) into Seamless Inquiry-Based Learning to Enhance Primary Students’ Science Learning

Exploring the Use of Electroencephalography to Gather Objective Evidence of Cognitive Processing During Problem Solving

Impact of Adding Internet Technology on Student Performance and Perception of Autonomy in Fundamentals of Electronics Course

Examining Educational Climate Change Technology: How Group Inquiry Work with Realistic Scientific Technology Alters Classroom Learning

Premium Partners